UG Mathematics Booster Test 3 - Operations on Matrices
📌 Answers are locked once submitted — results and explanations appear at the end.
QUESTION 1 OF 20
Which statement analytically evaluates the "same order rule" INCORRECTLY? (Incorrect Statement)
QUESTION 2 OF 20
Match each addition to its resulting element:
| List 1: | List 2: |
|---|---|
| 1. \(3+4\) | a. \(-7\) |
| 2. \(-5+(-2)\) | b. \(7\) |
| 3. \(1+2\) | c. \(3\) |
| 4. \(5+(-2)\) | d. \(3\) |
QUESTION 3 OF 20
Let
\(A=\left[\begin{pmatrix}1 & 2\\ 3 & 4\end{pmatrix}\right],k=\int_{0}^{1}\,2x dx=1\)
Find \(kA\).
QUESTION 4 OF 20
Let
\(P=\left[\begin{pmatrix}0.2 & 0.3\end{pmatrix}\right],k=5\)
Find expected failures matrix \(E=kP\).
QUESTION 5 OF 20
Assertion (A): The negative matrix \(-A\) is obtained by taking reciprocals.
Reason (R): \(-A=(-1)A\).
QUESTION 6 OF 20
Arrange steps to show \(-(-A)=A\):
1 Multiply scalar inside matrix
2 Identify \(-A\)
3 Negative signs cancel giving \(A\)
4 Apply outer scalar \(-1\)
QUESTION 7 OF 20
Let
\(M_{1}=\left[\begin{pmatrix}50 & 60\\ 70 & 80\end{pmatrix}\right],M_{2}=\left[\begin{pmatrix}45 & 55\\ 65 & 75\end{pmatrix}\right]\)
The price drop matrix is defined as:
\(D=M_{1}-M_{2}\)
Find \(D\).
QUESTION 8 OF 20
Why is
\(A-B=A+(-B)?\)
1. Subtraction is defined as addition of additive inverse
2. Matrix subtraction is a completely different operator
3. Both give element-wise result \(a_{ij}-b_{ij}\)
QUESTION 9 OF 20
Let
\(u=\left[\begin{pmatrix}2 & 3\end{pmatrix}\right],v=\left[\begin{pmatrix}4 & 1\end{pmatrix}\right]\)
Which property ensures
\(u+v=v+u?\)
QUESTION 10 OF 20
Let
\(A=\left[\begin{aligned}2\end{aligned}\right],B=\left[\begin{aligned}3\end{aligned}\right],C=\left[\begin{aligned}5\end{aligned}\right]\)
Find the intermediate matrix \(B+C\).
\(B+C=\left[\begin{aligned}8\end{aligned}\right]\)
QUESTION 11 OF 20
If \(O\) is the zero matrix, what role does it play under matrix addition?
QUESTION 12 OF 20
Let Monday's cash flow be
\(C=\left[\begin{pmatrix}100 & -50\end{pmatrix}\right]\)
If Tuesday's flow exactly cancels Monday's, what does Tuesday represent?
QUESTION 13 OF 20
\(A(B+C)=AB+AC\)
QUESTION 14 OF 20
\(A(B+C)=AB+AC\)
QUESTION 15 OF 20
Let cost matrix \(A=(1\times 3)\)and promotion matrix \(B=(3\times 2)\).
Which multiplication gives total cost per city?
QUESTION 16 OF 20
Let
\(A=\left[\begin{pmatrix}1 & 2 & 3\\ 4 & 5 & 6\\ 7 & 8 & 9\\ 2 & 1 & 0\end{pmatrix}\right],B=\left[\begin{pmatrix}1 & 0 & 2 & 1 & 3\\ 2 & 1 & 0 & 4 & 5\\ 3 & 2 & 1 & 0 & 6\end{pmatrix}\right]\)
Find the element in the 3rd row and 2nd column of the product matrix \(AB\).
QUESTION 17 OF 20
If \(A\) is \(m\times n\) and \(B\) is \(n\times p\), then
\(c_{ik}=?\)
QUESTION 18 OF 20
Let \(X\) be of order \(m\times n\) and \(Y\) be of order \(n\times p\).
Then \(XY\) is of order \(m\times p\).
If \(XY\) is a square matrix, what must be true?
QUESTION 19 OF 20
Let
\(A=\left[\begin{pmatrix}1 & 2\\ 0 & 1\end{pmatrix}\right],B=\left[\begin{pmatrix}2 & 0\\ 1 & 3\end{pmatrix}\right]\)
Compute:
\(AB=\left[\begin{pmatrix}4 & 6\\ 1 & 3\end{pmatrix}\right],BA=\left[\begin{pmatrix}2 & 4\\ 1 & 5\end{pmatrix}\right]\)
Since \(AB\neq BA\), what property is demonstrated?
QUESTION 20 OF 20
Let \(A\) be of order \(m\times n\).
For both \(AB\) and \(BA\) to be defined, what must be the order of \(B\)?
Test Complete!
Answer Review
1 Which statement analytically evaluates the "same order rule" INCORRECTLY? (Incorrect Statement)
Matrix addition requires identical order Same number of elements is insufficient Row and column structures must also match
Matrices can be added only when they have exactly the same order. A row matrix \(1\times n\) and a column matrix \(n\times 1\) have different structures, even if they contain the same number of elements. Therefore, Option C is incorrect. Options A, B, and D correctly describe the same-order rule for matrix addition.
- Option A → Correct because matrices of different orders cannot be added.
- Option B → Correct since the resulting sum matrix retains the same order as the original matrices.
- Option D → Correct because matrix addition is defined only for matrices of identical order.
Used: Elimination
Application:
- Remove statements consistent with matrix addition rules and identify the structurally incorrect one.
Final Logic:
- Equal element count alone does not guarantee equal order.
"Same shape, then add."
2 Match each addition to its resulting element:
| List 1: | List 2: |
|---|---|
| 1. \(3+4\) | a. \(-7\) |
| 2. \(-5+(-2)\) | b. \(7\) |
| 3. \(1+2\) | c. \(3\) |
| 4. \(5+(-2)\) | d. \(3\) |
Add integers carefully Positive and negative rules apply Match results systematically
Evaluating each expression: \(3+4=7-5+(-2)=-71+2=35+(-2)=3\) Thus the correct matching is: 1-b, 2-a, 3-c, 4-d. Hence Option A is correct.
- Option B → Incorrectly matches \(3+4\) with \(-7\).
- Option C → Swaps positive and negative results incorrectly.
- Option D → Several addition results are mismatched mathematically.
Used: Substitution
Application:
- Directly compute each arithmetic expression and match values.
Final Logic:
- Correct arithmetic gives the required matching pattern.
"Positive adds, negatives reduce."
3 Let
\(A=\left[\begin{pmatrix}1 & 2\\ 3 & 4\end{pmatrix}\right],k=\int_{0}^{1}\,2x dx=1\)
Find \(kA\).
Integral evaluates to 1 Multiplying by 1 leaves matrix unchanged Scalar identity property applies
Evaluate the integral: \(\int_{0}^{1}\,2x dx=[x^{2}]_{0}^{1}=1\) Thus \(k=1\). Scalar multiplication by 1 leaves every matrix unchanged: \(1A=A\) Therefore, Option A is correct. Other options represent multiplication by different scalars or unrelated matrices.
- Option B → Represents multiplication by scalar 2, not 1.
- Option C → Zero matrix would occur only if scalar were 0.
- Option D → Scalar multiplication does not replace all entries with 1.
Used: Substitution
Application:
- First evaluate the integral, then apply scalar multiplication rule.
Final Logic:
- Since \(k=1\), matrix remains unchanged.
"One keeps same."
4 Let
\(P=\left[\begin{pmatrix}0.2 & 0.3\end{pmatrix}\right],k=5\)
Find expected failures matrix \(E=kP\).
Multiply every element by scalar 5 \(5\times 0.2=1.0\) \(5\times 0.3=1.5\)
Scalar multiplication multiplies each matrix entry by the scalar: \(5\left[\begin{pmatrix}0.2 & 0.3\end{pmatrix}\right]=\left[\begin{pmatrix}1.0 & 1.5\end{pmatrix}\right]\) Thus Option A is correct. Option B changes notation inconsistently, while Options C and D ignore proper scalar multiplication rules.
- Option B → Numerically close, but matrix entries are inconsistently represented.
- Option C → Leaves matrix unchanged instead of scaling by 5.
- Option D → Scalar multiplication affects entries proportionally, not by replacing them with scalar values.
Used: Substitution
Application:
- Multiply scalar 5 directly with each element of the matrix.
Final Logic:
- Element-wise multiplication gives \(\left[1.0 1.5\right]\).
"Scalar touches every entry."
5 Assertion (A): The negative matrix \(-A\) is obtained by taking reciprocals.
Reason (R): \(-A=(-1)A\).
Negative matrix uses sign change Reciprocals are unrelated \(-A=(-1)A\) defines negative matrix
The negative of a matrix is formed by multiplying each element by \(-1\): \(-A=(-1)A\) . It is not obtained by taking reciprocals. Therefore, Assertion (A) is false while Reason (R) is true. Hence Option D is correct.
- Option A → Reason statement is actually correct.
- Option B → Assertion is false, not true.
- Option C → Since Assertion is false, both statements cannot be true together.
Used: Elimination
Application:
- Check the mathematical definition of negative matrix directly.
Final Logic:
- Negative means sign reversal, not reciprocal.
"Minus flips sign only."
6 Arrange steps to show \(-(-A)=A\):
1 Multiply scalar inside matrix
2 Identify \(-A\)
3 Negative signs cancel giving \(A\)
4 Apply outer scalar \(-1\)
Start with negative matrix Apply outer negative sign Signs cancel to recover original matrix
To evaluate: \(-(-A)\) first identify \(-A\), then apply outer scalar \(-1\). Next multiply the scalar inside the matrix. Finally, negative signs cancel and the original matrix \(A\) is obtained. Therefore, the correct order is: 2, 4, 1, 3.
- Option A → Starts multiplication before identifying the negative matrix.
- Option B → Incorrect placement of scalar multiplication step.
- Option D → Logical order is reversed completely.
Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application:
- Arrange steps according to the logical flow of evaluating nested negatives.
Final Logic:
- Double negatives restore original matrix.
"Minus of minus returns plus."
7 Let
\(M_{1}=\left[\begin{pmatrix}50 & 60\\ 70 & 80\end{pmatrix}\right],M_{2}=\left[\begin{pmatrix}45 & 55\\ 65 & 75\end{pmatrix}\right]\)
The price drop matrix is defined as:
\(D=M_{1}-M_{2}\)
Find \(D\).
Subtract corresponding entries \(50-45=5\) etc. All entries reduce by 5
Matrix subtraction is performed element-wise: \(D=\left[\begin{pmatrix}50-45 & 60-55\\ 70-65 & 80-75\end{pmatrix}\right]=\left[\begin{pmatrix}5 & 5\\ 5 & 5\end{pmatrix}\right]\) Thus Option A is correct.
- Option B → Adds matrices instead of subtracting them.
- Option C → Reverses subtraction order incorrectly.
- Option D → Leaves original matrix unchanged instead of subtracting.
Used: Substitution
Application:
- Subtract corresponding entries directly.
Final Logic:
- Element-wise subtraction gives all entries equal to 5.
"Subtract same positions."
8 Why is
\(A-B=A+(-B)?\)
1. Subtraction is defined as addition of additive inverse
2. Matrix subtraction is a completely different operator
3. Both give element-wise result \(a_{ij}-b_{ij}\)
Subtraction uses additive inverse Element-wise subtraction remains same Matrix subtraction is not separate fundamentally
Matrix subtraction is defined through addition of the additive inverse: \(A-B=A+(-B)\) . Both methods produce identical element-wise results \(a_{ij}-b_{ij}\). Therefore Statements 1 and 3 are correct. Statement 2 is false because subtraction is not an independent operation.
- Option A → Ignores the valid element-wise interpretation in Statement 3.
- Option C → Statement 2 is false since subtraction depends on additive inverse.
- Option D → Includes incorrect Statement 2.
Used: Elimination
Application:
- Check which statements align with the formal definition of subtraction.
Final Logic:
- Subtraction equals addition of inverse.
"Subtract = add opposite."
9 Let
\(u=\left[\begin{pmatrix}2 & 3\end{pmatrix}\right],v=\left[\begin{pmatrix}4 & 1\end{pmatrix}\right]\)
Which property ensures
\(u+v=v+u?\)
Order of addition can change Sum remains same This defines commutativity
The commutative law of matrix addition states: \(A+B=B+A\) . Therefore, \(u+v=v+u\) is guaranteed by commutativity. Associativity concerns grouping, scalar multiplication concerns scaling, and additive identity concerns zero matrix properties.
- Option A → Associativity changes grouping, not order.
- Option B → Scalar multiplication is unrelated to matrix addition order.
- Option D → Additive identity involves adding zero matrix only.
Used: Option Grouping
Application:
- Match the equation with the standard matrix property.
Final Logic:
- Changing order without changing sum means commutativity.
"Swap order, same sum."
10 Let
\(A=\left[\begin{aligned}2\end{aligned}\right],B=\left[\begin{aligned}3\end{aligned}\right],C=\left[\begin{aligned}5\end{aligned}\right]\)
Find the intermediate matrix \(B+C\).
\(B+C=\left[\begin{aligned}8\end{aligned}\right]\)
Add scalar entries directly \(3+5=8\) Result is single-entry matrix
Since both matrices are \(1\times 1\), addition is simple scalar addition: \(B+C=\left[\begin{aligned}3+5\end{aligned}\right]=\left[\begin{aligned}8\end{aligned}\right]\) Thus Option A is correct.
- Option B → Represents only one original matrix value.
- Option C → Incorrect arithmetic addition.
- Option D → Ignores second matrix entry entirely.
Used: Substitution
Application:
- Directly add corresponding matrix entries.
Final Logic:
- \(3+5=8\)
"Add inside entries."
11 If \(O\) is the zero matrix, what role does it play under matrix addition?
Zero matrix leaves matrices unchanged \(A+O=A\) for all matrices Hence it acts as additive identity
The zero matrix acts as the additive identity in matrix algebra because adding it to any matrix leaves the matrix unchanged: \(A+O=A\) . Therefore, Option D is correct. Option A refers to additive inverse, Option B to multiplicative identity, and Option C is unrelated to identity properties.
- Option A → Additive inverse of \(A\) is \(-A\), not the zero matrix.
- Option B → Multiplicative identity is the identity matrix \(I\), satisfying \(AI=IA=A\).
- Option C → Scalar multiplication changes matrix entries and is not an identity role.
Used: Elimination
Application:
- Use the defining identity property under addition to remove unrelated matrix operations.
Final Logic:
- Since \(A+O=A\), zero matrix is the additive identity.
"Add zero → Same matrix."
12 Let Monday's cash flow be
\(C=\left[\begin{pmatrix}100 & -50\end{pmatrix}\right]\)
If Tuesday's flow exactly cancels Monday's, what does Tuesday represent?
Opposite matrix cancels original matrix \(A+(-A)=O\) Tuesday flow balances Monday completely
If Tuesday's cash flow exactly cancels Monday's flow, their sum becomes the zero matrix: \(C+(-C)=O\) . Therefore, Tuesday's matrix represents the additive inverse of \(C\). Option B is correct. Other options describe different matrix operations unrelated to cancellation.
- Option A → Multiplicative inverse relates to matrix inversion, not cancellation under addition.
- Option C → Identity matrix leaves multiplication unchanged, not addition.
- Option D → Transpose only interchanges rows and columns without cancelling values.
Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application:
- Interpret "exactly cancels" as additive inverse behavior in matrices.
Final Logic:
- Cancellation under addition means additive inverse.
"Opposite entries cancel."
13
\(A(B+C)=AB+AC\)
Matrix multiplication distributes over addition Multiply \(A\) separately with \(B\) and \(C\) Add resulting matrices
The distributive law for matrices states: \(A(B+C)=AB+AC\) . Matrix \(A\) multiplies each matrix inside the bracket individually. Hence Option C is correct. Option A changes multiplication order incorrectly, Option B represents another distributive form, and Option D is mathematically invalid.
- Option A → \(AB+BA\) incorrectly changes order; matrix multiplication is generally non-commutative.
- Option B → Though valid separately, it does not match the exact expression asked.
- Option D → Matrix multiplication cannot disappear into simple addition.
Used: Option Grouping
Application:
- Identify the exact standard distributive identity used in NCERT matrix algebra.
Final Logic:
- Distribute \(A\) over both matrices:
- \(A(B+C)=AB+AC\)
"Multiply each inside term."
14
\(A(B+C)=AB+AC\)
Scalar multiplication distributes over addition Multiply scalar with each matrix separately Order of matrices remains unchanged
Scalar multiplication satisfies the distributive property: \(k(A+B)=kA+kB\) . The scalar multiplies every element of both matrices individually. Therefore, Option A is correct. Other options either omit multiplication correctly or use invalid matrix operations.
- Option B → Scalar must multiply both matrices, not only one.
- Option C → \(AB\) represents matrix multiplication, unrelated to scalar distribution here.
- Option D → Scalar multiplication cannot leave the matrix unchanged unless \(k=1\).
Used: Substitution
Application:
- Apply the distributive property of scalar multiplication directly.
Final Logic:
- Scalar distributes across matrix addition.
"Scalar multiplies all terms."
15 Let cost matrix \(A=(1\times 3)\)and promotion matrix \(B=(3\times 2)\).
Which multiplication gives total cost per city?
Inner dimensions must match \(\left(1\times 3)(3\times 2\right)\)is defined Result gives \(1\times 2\) city totals
Matrix multiplication is defined when columns of the first matrix equal rows of the second. Here, \(\left(1\times 3)(3\times 2\right)\) is valid and gives a \(1\times 2\) matrix. Hence \(AB\) is defined. But \(\left(3\times 2)(1\times 3\right)\) is invalid since \(2\neq 1\). Therefore, Option A is correct.
- Option B → \(BA\) is undefined because inner dimensions do not match.
- Option C → Only one multiplication order works, not both.
- Option D → \(AB\) is clearly defined under matrix multiplication rules.
Used: Dimensional/Unit Analysis
Application:
- Check compatibility of inner dimensions before multiplication.
Final Logic:
- Since \(3=3\), \(AB\) exists.
"Inside numbers must match."
16 Let
\(A=\left[\begin{pmatrix}1 & 2 & 3\\ 4 & 5 & 6\\ 7 & 8 & 9\\ 2 & 1 & 0\end{pmatrix}\right],B=\left[\begin{pmatrix}1 & 0 & 2 & 1 & 3\\ 2 & 1 & 0 & 4 & 5\\ 3 & 2 & 1 & 0 & 6\end{pmatrix}\right]\)
Find the element in the 3rd row and 2nd column of the product matrix \(AB\).
Use row–column multiplication rule Multiply 3rd row of \(A\) with 2nd column of \(B\) Sum obtained products carefully
The 3rd row of \(A\) is: \(\left[7 8 9\right]\) and the 2nd column of \(B\) is: \(\left[\begin{aligned}0\\ 1\\ 2\end{aligned}\right]\) . Therefore, \(7(0)+8(1)+9(2)=0+8+18=26\) So the correct answer should actually be:
- Option B → Comes from incorrect multiplication or addition during row–column computation.
- Option C → Provided answer is mathematically incorrect after proper calculation.
- Option D → Obtained from arithmetic error in summation.
Used: Substitution
Application:
- Substitute row and column entries directly into multiplication formula.
Final Logic:
- \(7(0)+8(1)+9(2)=26\)
"Row dot column."
17 If \(A\) is \(m\times n\) and \(B\) is \(n\times p\), then
\(c_{ik}=?\)
Product entries use summation notation Multiply row and column entries Sum over common dimension \(n\)
For matrix multiplication, \(c_{ik}=\sum_{j=1}^{n}\,a_{ij}b_{jk}\) where \(n\) is the common dimension. Each entry is obtained by multiplying corresponding row and column elements and then summing them. Hence Option A is correct. Other options use incorrect limits or formulas.
- Option B → Summation should run through common dimension \(n\), not \(m\).
- Option C → Matrix multiplication is not simple element-wise multiplication.
- Option D → Upper limit cannot be \(p\) because \(p\) is output column count.
Used: Option Grouping
Application:
- Identify the standard NCERT formula for matrix product entries.
Final Logic:
- Common dimension \(n\) determines summation range.
"Sum across shared dimension."
18 Let \(X\) be of order \(m\times n\) and \(Y\) be of order \(n\times p\).
Then \(XY\) is of order \(m\times p\).
If \(XY\) is a square matrix, what must be true?
Square matrix has equal rows and columns \(XY\) has order \(m\times p\) Hence \(m=p\)
The product matrix \(XY\) has order: \(m\times p\) . A square matrix requires equal number of rows and columns. Therefore, \(m=p\) must hold. Hence Option B is correct. Other options compare unrelated dimensions.
- Option A → Equality of \(n\) and \(p\) does not guarantee square result.
- Option C → \(m=n\) concerns only first matrix dimensions.
- Option D → Equality of \(n\) and \(m\) is unnecessary for square product.
Used: Dimensional/Unit Analysis
Application:
- Use output order condition for square matrices.
Final Logic:
- Square matrix implies rows = columns:
- \(m=p\)
"Square → outer dimensions equal."
19 Let
\(A=\left[\begin{pmatrix}1 & 2\\ 0 & 1\end{pmatrix}\right],B=\left[\begin{pmatrix}2 & 0\\ 1 & 3\end{pmatrix}\right]\)
Compute:
\(AB=\left[\begin{pmatrix}4 & 6\\ 1 & 3\end{pmatrix}\right],BA=\left[\begin{pmatrix}2 & 4\\ 1 & 5\end{pmatrix}\right]\)
Since \(AB\neq BA\), what property is demonstrated?
Changing multiplication order changes result \(AB\neq BA\) Matrix multiplication is generally non-commutative
The matrices satisfy: \(AB\neq BA\) . This directly demonstrates the non-commutative nature of matrix multiplication. Hence Option D is correct. Associativity concerns grouping, not order, while commutativity would require equal products.
- Option A → Identity existence involves identity matrix properties, not unequal products.
- Option B → Associativity relates to \(\left(AB)C=A(BC\right)\), not order reversal.
- Option C → Commutativity would require \(AB=BA\), which is false here.
Used: Odd One Out
Application:
- Identify the property violated when multiplication order changes.
Final Logic:
- Unequal products confirm non-commutativity.
"Order matters in multiplication."
20 Let \(A\) be of order \(m\times n\).
For both \(AB\) and \(BA\) to be defined, what must be the order of \(B\)?
\(AB\) requires columns of \(A\)=rows of \(B\) \(BA\) requires columns of \(B\)=rows of \(A\) Hence \(B\) must be \(n\times m\)
If \(A\) is \(m\times n\), then for \(AB\) to exist, \(B\) must have \(n\) rows. For \(BA\) to exist simultaneously, \(B\) must also have \(m\) columns. Thus \(B\) must be of order: \(n\times m\) . Hence Option A is correct.
- Option B → Same order does not always guarantee both products exist.
- Option C → Only ensures \(AB\) may exist in special cases.
- Option D → Does not satisfy both compatibility conditions generally.
Used: Dimensional/Unit Analysis
Application:
- Apply multiplication compatibility rules in both directions.
Final Logic:
- Both products require:
- \(B=n\times m\)
"Reverse dimensions for both products."
