CUET UG Physics Booster Test 3- Nuclear Forces and Stability
📌 Answers are locked once submitted — results and explanations appear at the end.
QUESTION 1 OF 20
Match List I with List II regarding internal nuclear force dynamics
| List I | List II |
|---|---|
| 1. Short-range Strong Nuclear Force | a. Approximately 8 MeV per nucleon for middle mass range |
| 2. Coulomb Force Repulsion | b. Inherently opposes the tight binding of the nucleus |
| 3. Nuclear Binding Energy | c. Essential to bind both protons and neutrons tightly |
| 4. Force Magnitude Ratio | d. Nuclear force dominates over electrostatic completely |
QUESTION 2 OF 20
Correct statements interpreting the interplay of constituent forces in heavy nuclei
1. As overall mass increases, relatively more neutrons are needed to help overcome accumulating proton repulsion.
2. The Coulomb force plays virtually no role in defining the stability boundary of heavy nuclei.
3. Coulomb repulsion acts across the whole nucleus, unlike the short-ranged strong nuclear force.
4. The strong binding force must consistently counteract the additive Coulomb repulsion.
QUESTION 3 OF 20
Analytical statements on the potential energy minimum (r₀) between two nucleons
1. It strictly occurs at approximately 0.8 fm.
2. At exactly r₀, the attractive and repulsive force gradients balance to zero.
3. Forcing the nucleons closer than r₀ requires massive external energy.
4. At r₀, the nuclear force becomes infinitely strong.
QUESTION 4 OF 20
Incorrect statement regarding nucleon interactions when forced below the 0.8 fm distance,
QUESTION 5 OF 20
The exceptionally short-range nature of the nuclear force directly implies that
QUESTION 6 OF 20
Given a nucleus with a radius expressed as R = 1.2A^(1/3) fm, the sphere of influence of the nuclear force for a single inner nucleon mathematically extends to a distance of:
QUESTION 7 OF 20
If an interior nucleon can conceptually have a maximum of exactly p neighbours actively within the functional range of the nuclear force, its total binding energy contribution is analytically proportional to:
QUESTION 8 OF 20
Because the vast majority of nucleons in a sufficiently large nucleus are deeply embedded inside rather than exposed on the surface,
QUESTION 9 OF 20
The remarkable equality of strong forces between varied nucleon pairs rigorously demonstrates its __________, a trait that sets it fundamentally apart from the purely __________ force.
QUESTION 10 OF 20
Which exact pairing of equivalent interaction strengths conclusively confirms that the strong nuclear force entirely disregards electric charge?
QUESTION 11 OF 20
Match List I with List II regarding the analytical hierarchy of fundamental forces in the nucleus
| List I | List II |
|---|---|
| 1. Strong Nuclear Force | a. Becomes a strongly repulsive core |
| 2. Electromagnetic Force | b. Overcomes proton-proton electrostatic repulsion |
| 3. Gravitational Force | c. The absolute weakest interaction, essentially negligible |
| 4. Force behavior at r < 0.8 fm | d. Causes long-range repulsion between all protons |
QUESTION 12 OF 20
Correct analytical statements explaining why progressively heavier nuclei strictly require proportionally more neutrons
1. Added neutrons increase the total strong nuclear force without contributing any extra Coulomb repulsion.
2. Cumulative Coulomb repulsion between protons acts long-range across the entire nuclear volume.
3. The strong force quickly saturates, preventing a proton from simply binding all other distant protons.
4. Neutrons provide a necessary negative structural charge to perfectly cancel the protons.
QUESTION 13 OF 20
Incorrect statement regarding the advanced mathematical modeling of nuclear forces
QUESTION 14 OF 20
When critically analyzing the precise potential energy plot of two interacting nucleons
QUESTION 15 OF 20
For lighter nuclei, prolonged stability is generally maintained when the operational ratio of neutrons to protons is meticulously around 1:1, largely because
QUESTION 16 OF 20
Analytical statements on the stability threshold for heavy nuclei
1. The fundamentally required N/Z ratio increases steadily to about 3:2.
2. Extra incorporated neutrons actively help dilute the accumulating Coulomb repulsion.
3. The stable ratio remains strictly fixed at 1:1 all the way up to A = 240.
4. Extremely heavy nuclei may spontaneously undergo decay to restore optimal stability.
QUESTION 17 OF 20
Nuclei populated with an __________ of either specific protons or neutrons deviate sharply from the defined stability band, rendering them highly susceptible to spontaneous __________.
QUESTION 18 OF 20
Match List I with List II regarding the precise nature of radioactive decay triggers
| List I | List II |
|---|---|
| 1. Alpha decay mechanism | a. Deviating from stable nucleon ratio (excess nucleons) |
| 2. Beta decay mechanism | b. Direct emission of a heavily bound helium nucleus |
| 3. Gamma decay mechanism | c. Secondary emission of high energy electromagnetic photons |
| 4. Primary instability cause | d. Emission of elemental electrons or positrons |
QUESTION 19 OF 20
Statistically, out of the entire catalog of known isotopes spanning the universe and laboratory creations, what is the approximate fractional representation of perfectly stable ones?
QUESTION 20 OF 20
When physicists artificially produce unstable isotopes by bombarding stable targets, they add to the pool of known elements. If it is established that 90% of known isotopes are currently unstable, and theoretically there are roughly 3000 known isotopes documented, approximately how many of these are stable species?
Test Complete!
Answer Review
1 Match List I with List II regarding internal nuclear force dynamics
| List I | List II |
|---|---|
| 1. Short-range Strong Nuclear Force | a. Approximately 8 MeV per nucleon for middle mass range |
| 2. Coulomb Force Repulsion | b. Inherently opposes the tight binding of the nucleus |
| 3. Nuclear Binding Energy | c. Essential to bind both protons and neutrons tightly |
| 4. Force Magnitude Ratio | d. Nuclear force dominates over electrostatic completely |
�� Strong force binds nucleons. �� Coulomb force opposes binding. �� Binding energy is a few MeV per nucleon.
1 → c : Strong nuclear force binds protons and neutrons tightly. 2 → b : Coulomb repulsion opposes nuclear binding. 3 → a : Binding energy is about 8 MeV per nucleon for medium-mass nuclei. 4 → d : Strong nuclear force dominates electrostatic repulsion inside the nucleus. Therefore, option A is correct.
- �� Option B → Strong force and binding energy are mismatched.
- �� Option C → Coulomb force is incorrectly matched.
- �� Option D → Multiple pairings are incorrect.
Used
- Option Grouping
Application:
- Match each nuclear concept with its physical role.
Final Logic:
- Strong → Binding, Coulomb → Opposition, Binding Energy → ~8 MeV, Strong > Coulomb.
Strong Binds, Coulomb Pushes
2 Correct statements interpreting the interplay of constituent forces in heavy nuclei
1. As overall mass increases, relatively more neutrons are needed to help overcome accumulating proton repulsion.
2. The Coulomb force plays virtually no role in defining the stability boundary of heavy nuclei.
3. Coulomb repulsion acts across the whole nucleus, unlike the short-ranged strong nuclear force.
4. The strong binding force must consistently counteract the additive Coulomb repulsion.
�� Heavy nuclei require extra neutrons. �� Coulomb force acts throughout the nucleus. �� Strong force is short-ranged.
Statement 1 is correct because heavy nuclei require more neutrons for stability. Statement 2 is incorrect because Coulomb repulsion strongly influences stability. Statement 3 is correct because Coulomb force is long-ranged. Statement 4 is correct because strong force must overcome proton repulsion. Therefore, statements 1, 3 and 4 are correct.
- �� Option B → Includes statement 2, which is incorrect.
- �� Option C → Includes statement 2, which is incorrect.
- �� Option D → Omits statement 3, which is correct.
Used
- Elimination
Application:
- Compare long-range Coulomb force with short-range strong force.
Final Logic:
- Only statements 1, 3 and 4 correctly describe heavy nuclei.
Heavy Nuclei Need More Neutrons
3 Analytical statements on the potential energy minimum (r₀) between two nucleons
1. It strictly occurs at approximately 0.8 fm.
2. At exactly r₀, the attractive and repulsive force gradients balance to zero.
3. Forcing the nucleons closer than r₀ requires massive external energy.
4. At r₀, the nuclear force becomes infinitely strong.
�� r₀ corresponds to minimum potential energy. �� Net force is zero at equilibrium. �� Compression below r₀ faces strong repulsion.
Statement 1 is correct because r₀ is approximately 0.8 fm. Statement 2 is correct because net force is zero at the minimum-energy point. Statement 3 is correct because repulsive forces increase rapidly below r₀. Statement 4 is incorrect because the force does not become infinite. Therefore, statements 1, 2 and 3 are correct.
- �� Option A → Includes statement 4, which is incorrect.
- �� Option B → Includes statement 4, which is incorrect.
- �� Option D → Includes statement 4, which is incorrect.
Used
- Elimination
Application:
- Interpret the equilibrium point on the potential-energy curve.
Final Logic:
- At r₀, energy is minimum and force is balanced.
r₀ = Balance Point
4 Incorrect statement regarding nucleon interactions when forced below the 0.8 fm distance,
�� Repulsive core exists below 0.8 fm. �� Potential energy rises sharply. �� Repulsion prevents collapse.
When nucleons are pushed below approximately 0.8 fm, a strong repulsive force develops. Consequently, the potential energy increases sharply rather than decreasing further. Therefore, option D is correct.
- �� Option A → Correct description of the repulsive core.
- �� Option B → Correct behaviour of the potential-energy curve.
- �� Option C → Correct role of short-range repulsion.
Used
- Odd One Out
Application:
- Identify the statement contradicting the nucleon potential-energy graph.
Final Logic:
- Below 0.8 fm, potential energy rises, not falls.
Too Close → Repel
5 The exceptionally short-range nature of the nuclear force directly implies that
�� Nuclear force acts over a few femtometres. �� Only nearby nucleons interact strongly. �� Saturation results naturally.
Because the nuclear force is highly short-ranged, a nucleon interacts significantly only with nearby neighbours. This limited interaction causes the binding energy per nucleon to become nearly constant in medium and heavy nuclei. Therefore, option B is correct.
- �� Option A → Distant nucleons are not significantly affected.
- �� Option C → Nuclear force does not obey a simple inverse-square law.
- �� Option D → Nuclear force is ineffective at interatomic distances.
Used
- Elimination
Application:
- Use the concept of short-range interaction.
Final Logic:
- Short range produces neighbour interaction and saturation.
Short Range → Saturation
6 Given a nucleus with a radius expressed as R = 1.2A^(1/3) fm, the sphere of influence of the nuclear force for a single inner nucleon mathematically extends to a distance of:
�� Nuclear force is short-ranged. �� Influence extends only a few fm. �� Large nuclei contain many unaffected distant nucleons.
The strong nuclear force acts effectively only over a few femtometres. Even inside a large nucleus, a nucleon interacts significantly only with nearby neighbours. Therefore, option A is correct.
- �� Option B → Nuclear force is not long-ranged.
- �� Option C → 10⁻¹⁰ m corresponds to atomic scales.
- �� Option D → 1.2 fm is not the range throughout the atom.
Used
- Dimensional/Unit Analysis
Application:
- Compare nuclear-force range with atomic dimensions.
Final Logic:
- Strong force influences only a few femtometres.
Strong Force = Few fm
7 If an interior nucleon can conceptually have a maximum of exactly p neighbours actively within the functional range of the nuclear force, its total binding energy contribution is analytically proportional to:
�� Each neighbour contributes attraction. �� Total contribution is additive. �� Saturation limits neighbour count.
If each neighbour contributes approximately the same interaction energy, the total binding contribution of a nucleon is proportional to the number of neighbouring nucleons within range. Hence, total binding energy contribution ∝ p. Therefore, option B is correct.
- �� Option A → Interaction energy is not proportional to p².
- �� Option C → Inverse dependence is incorrect.
- �� Option D → No factor of 1/2 arises here.
Used
- Substitution
Application:
- Sum equal interaction contributions.
Final Logic:
- More neighbours → proportionally greater binding contribution.
More Neighbours → More Binding
8 Because the vast majority of nucleons in a sufficiently large nucleus are deeply embedded inside rather than exposed on the surface,
�� Most nucleons are interior nucleons. �� Interior nucleons have similar environments. �� Binding energy per nucleon becomes nearly constant.
In large nuclei, most nucleons are surrounded by approximately the same number of neighbours. Due to saturation of nuclear forces, the binding energy per nucleon becomes nearly constant over a wide mass range. Therefore, option B is correct.
- �� Option A → Binding energy per nucleon changes gradually.
- �� Option C → Surface nucleons do not dominate structure.
- �� Option D → Beta decay is unrelated to surface nucleons.
Used
- Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application:
- Apply saturation-property concepts.
Final Logic:
- Similar interior environments produce nearly constant binding energy per nucleon.
Large Nucleus → Constant E/A
9 The remarkable equality of strong forces between varied nucleon pairs rigorously demonstrates its __________, a trait that sets it fundamentally apart from the purely __________ force.
�� Strong force is nearly charge independent. �� p-p, n-n and p-n interactions are similar. �� Coulomb force depends on charge.
The near equality of strong-force interactions among different nucleon pairs demonstrates charge independence. This contrasts with Coulomb force, which depends directly on electric charge. Therefore, option A is correct.
- �� Option B → Charge independence is the relevant property, not infinite range.
- �� Option C → Nuclear force does not possess a simple mathematical form.
- �� Option D → Induced instability is unrelated.
Used
- Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application:
- Relate nucleon-force equality to charge independence.
Final Logic:
- Equal nucleon interactions imply charge independence.
Equal Forces → Ignore Charge
10 Which exact pairing of equivalent interaction strengths conclusively confirms that the strong nuclear force entirely disregards electric charge?
�� Charge independence means force strength is nearly unchanged. �� p-p and n-n interactions are nearly equal. �� Electric charge does not significantly affect strong force.
Experimental observations show that the strong nuclear force between proton-proton pairs is approximately equal to that between neutron-neutron pairs. This equality demonstrates charge independence. Therefore, option B is correct.
- �� Option A → Electron interactions do not establish nuclear-force charge independence.
- �� Option C → Unrelated physical entities.
- �� Option D → Does not test nucleon interactions.
Used
- Elimination
Application:
- Identify the comparison directly involving nucleon pairs.
Final Logic:
- p-p ≈ n-n confirms charge independence.
p-p ≈ n-n
11 Match List I with List II regarding the analytical hierarchy of fundamental forces in the nucleus
| List I | List II |
|---|---|
| 1. Strong Nuclear Force | a. Becomes a strongly repulsive core |
| 2. Electromagnetic Force | b. Overcomes proton-proton electrostatic repulsion |
| 3. Gravitational Force | c. The absolute weakest interaction, essentially negligible |
| 4. Force behavior at r < 0.8 fm | d. Causes long-range repulsion between all protons |
�� Strong force binds nucleons. �� Electromagnetic force causes proton repulsion. �� Gravity is negligible at nuclear scales.
1 → b : Strong nuclear force overcomes proton-proton repulsion. 2 → d : Electromagnetic force produces long-range repulsion between protons. 3 → c : Gravity is the weakest interaction inside the nucleus. 4 → a : For r < 0.8 fm, the nuclear force becomes strongly repulsive. Therefore, option C is correct.
- �� Option A → Gravity and strong force are incorrectly matched.
- �� Option B → Strong force and repulsive-core behavior are interchanged.
- �� Option D → Multiple pairings are physically incorrect.
Used
- Option Grouping
Application:
- Associate each force with its characteristic role.
Final Logic:
- Strong → binding, EM → repulsion, Gravity → weakest, r < 0.8 fm → repulsive core.
Strong Binds, EM Pushes
12 Correct analytical statements explaining why progressively heavier nuclei strictly require proportionally more neutrons
1. Added neutrons increase the total strong nuclear force without contributing any extra Coulomb repulsion.
2. Cumulative Coulomb repulsion between protons acts long-range across the entire nuclear volume.
3. The strong force quickly saturates, preventing a proton from simply binding all other distant protons.
4. Neutrons provide a necessary negative structural charge to perfectly cancel the protons.
�� Extra neutrons increase nuclear attraction. �� Coulomb repulsion grows with proton number. �� Strong force is short-ranged and saturates.
Statement 1 is correct because neutrons contribute to strong-force attraction without increasing electrical repulsion. Statement 2 is correct because Coulomb force acts throughout the nucleus. Statement 3 is correct because saturation limits the number of nucleons that one proton can strongly interact with. Statement 4 is incorrect because neutrons are electrically neutral. Therefore, statements 1, 2 and 3 are correct.
- �� Option B → Includes statement 4, which is incorrect.
- �� Option C → Includes statement 4, which is incorrect and omits statement 2.
- �� Option D → Includes statement 4, which is incorrect.
Used
- Elimination
Application:
- Evaluate each statement using nuclear-stability concepts.
Final Logic:
- Heavy nuclei require extra neutrons because Coulomb repulsion grows while strong force saturates.
More Protons → More Neutrons
13 Incorrect statement regarding the advanced mathematical modeling of nuclear forces
�� Strong force is mathematically complex. �� It is not described by a simple inverse-square law. �� It changes from attraction to repulsion.
Unlike gravitational and electrostatic forces, the strong nuclear force does not possess a simple universally applicable mathematical formula identical to Coulomb's law. Its behavior depends strongly on distance and includes both attractive and repulsive regions. Therefore, option C is correct.
- �� Option A → Correct statement regarding complexity.
- �� Option B → Correct explanation of the mathematical difficulty.
- �� Option D → Correct because strong force is largely charge independent.
Used
- Odd One Out
Application:
- Identify the statement falsely attributing Coulomb-like simplicity to the strong force.
Final Logic:
- Strong force has no simple Coulomb-type formula.
Strong Force ≠ Coulomb Law
14 When critically analyzing the precise potential energy plot of two interacting nucleons
�� Potential energy rises sharply below 0.8 fm. �� This indicates a repulsive core. �� Nucleons cannot collapse into one another.
For separations below approximately 0.8 fm, the nucleon potential-energy curve rises very steeply. This behavior corresponds to the strong repulsive core of the nuclear force. Therefore, option B is correct.
- �� Option A → Potential energy is not exactly zero for all r > 0.8 fm.
- �� Option C → r = 0.8 fm corresponds approximately to minimum potential energy.
- �� Option D → The curve is not symmetric.
Used
- Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application:
- Interpret the shape of the nucleon potential-energy curve.
Final Logic:
- Steep upward rise below 0.8 fm signifies strong repulsion.
Below 0.8 → Sharp Rise
15 For lighter nuclei, prolonged stability is generally maintained when the operational ratio of neutrons to protons is meticulously around 1:1, largely because
�� Light nuclei contain fewer protons. �� Coulomb repulsion is comparatively small. �� N ≈ Z provides stability.
In light nuclei, the number of protons is small, so Coulomb repulsion remains relatively weak. Consequently, a neutron-to-proton ratio close to 1:1 is sufficient for stable nuclear binding. Therefore, option A is correct.
- �� Option B → Light nuclei do not possess extremely high Coulomb barriers.
- �� Option C → Light nuclei are not characterized by excess neutrons causing fission.
- �� Option D → Most light stable nuclei do not undergo rapid alpha decay.
Used
- Elimination
Application:
- Relate stability to Coulomb repulsion and strong-force dominance.
Final Logic:
- Low proton count allows N/Z ≈ 1.
Light Nuclei → N = Z
16 Analytical statements on the stability threshold for heavy nuclei
1. The fundamentally required N/Z ratio increases steadily to about 3:2.
2. Extra incorporated neutrons actively help dilute the accumulating Coulomb repulsion.
3. The stable ratio remains strictly fixed at 1:1 all the way up to A = 240.
4. Extremely heavy nuclei may spontaneously undergo decay to restore optimal stability.
�� Heavy nuclei require extra neutrons. �� N/Z ratio increases with mass number. �� Very heavy nuclei often decay spontaneously.
Statement 1 is correct because the stability ratio increases toward about 3:2. Statement 2 is correct because neutrons contribute strong-force attraction without electrical repulsion. Statement 3 is incorrect because heavy nuclei are not stable at N/Z = 1. Statement 4 is correct because many very heavy nuclei are radioactive. Therefore, statements 1, 2 and 4 are correct.
- �� Option B → Includes statement 3, which is incorrect.
- �� Option C → Includes statement 3, which is incorrect.
- �� Option D → Omits statement 1, which is correct.
Used
- Elimination
Application:
- Evaluate each statement using the stability-band concept.
Final Logic:
- Heavy nuclei require larger N/Z ratios and often decay.
Heavy → 3:2 → Decay
17 Nuclei populated with an __________ of either specific protons or neutrons deviate sharply from the defined stability band, rendering them highly susceptible to spontaneous __________.
�� Stable nuclei follow the stability band. �� Excess nucleons create imbalance. �� Imbalance causes radioactive decay.
Nuclei containing an excess of neutrons or protons relative to the stable ratio become unstable. Such instability generally leads to radioactive decay processes. Therefore, option D is correct.
- �� Option A → Equilibrium does not cause fission.
- �� Option B → Equality promotes stability, not radioactivity.
- �� Option C → Absence of nucleons does not imply fusion.
Used
- Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application:
- Associate stability-band deviation with radioactivity.
Final Logic:
- Excess nucleons lead to radioactive instability.
Excess → Decay
18 Match List I with List II regarding the precise nature of radioactive decay triggers
| List I | List II |
|---|---|
| 1. Alpha decay mechanism | a. Deviating from stable nucleon ratio (excess nucleons) |
| 2. Beta decay mechanism | b. Direct emission of a heavily bound helium nucleus |
| 3. Gamma decay mechanism | c. Secondary emission of high energy electromagnetic photons |
| 4. Primary instability cause | d. Emission of elemental electrons or positrons |
�� Alpha decay emits helium nuclei. �� Beta decay emits electrons or positrons. �� Gamma decay emits photons.
1 → b : Alpha decay emits a helium nucleus. 2 → d : Beta decay emits electrons or positrons. 3 → c : Gamma decay emits high-energy photons. 4 → a : Instability often arises from deviation from the stable neutron-proton ratio. Therefore, option A is correct.
- �� Option B → Alpha and instability matches are incorrect.
- �� Option C → Multiple decay modes are mismatched.
- �� Option D → All principal decay processes are incorrectly matched.
Used
- Option Grouping
Application:
- Match each decay type with its emitted particle.
Final Logic:
- Alpha → He, Beta → e±, Gamma → Photon.
α-He, β-e, γ-Photon
19 Statistically, out of the entire catalog of known isotopes spanning the universe and laboratory creations, what is the approximate fractional representation of perfectly stable ones?
�� Most isotopes are radioactive. �� Stable isotopes are comparatively few. �� Approximately 10% are stable.
Among all known isotopes, only about one-tenth are stable. The remaining majority are radioactive and undergo decay. Therefore, option A is correct.
- �� Option B → Greatly overestimates stable isotopes.
- �� Option C → Represents approximately the unstable fraction.
- �� Option D → Underestimates the stable fraction.
Used
- Memory-Based Recall
Application:
- Recall the approximate distribution of stable isotopes.
Final Logic:
- Stable isotopes comprise about 10% of known isotopes.
Stable ≈ 10%
20 When physicists artificially produce unstable isotopes by bombarding stable targets, they add to the pool of known elements. If it is established that 90% of known isotopes are currently unstable, and theoretically there are roughly 3000 known isotopes documented, approximately how many of these are stable species?
�� Stable isotopes ≈ 10%. �� Total isotopes = 3000. �� Calculate 10% of 3000.
If 90% are unstable, then 10% are stable. Stable isotopes: = 10% × 3000 = 0.10 × 3000 = 300 Therefore, option D is correct.
- �� Option A → Corresponds to only 1%.
- �� Option B → Corresponds to 50%.
- �� Option C → Corresponds approximately to 90%.
Used
- Substitution
Application:
- Use percentage calculation directly.
Final Logic:
- 10% of 3000 = 300.
10% of 3000 → Move Decimal → 300
