CUET UG Physics Booster Test 3- Experimental Study of Photoelectric Effect
📌 Answers are locked once submitted — results and explanations appear at the end.
QUESTION 1 OF 20
Statements concerning the transmission of radiation through the experimental window:
1. If ordinary glass were used instead of quartz, zinc and magnesium might not exhibit photoelectric emission.
2. Alkali metals like lithium and sodium can exhibit emission even if the window only transmits visible light.
3. The quartz window strictly permits only visible light and blocks ultraviolet rays.
4. Transmitting UV radiation is crucial for materials with higher work functions.
QUESTION 2 OF 20
By reversing the commutator polarity and precisely locating the cut-off potential, a physicist effectively measures
QUESTION 3 OF 20
Incorrect statement about interpreting the voltmeter readings during the experiment:
QUESTION 4 OF 20
For a constant frequency ν > ν₀, the saturation photocurrent I measured by the microammeter varies with the source distance r according to the relation:
QUESTION 5 OF 20
When the source is moved closer to the emitter, the amplitude of electric and magnetic fields in the classical wave picture is ______, but in the photon picture, the energy of each individual photon remains ______.
QUESTION 6 OF 20
The strict linearity between photocurrent and intensity fundamentally rules out
QUESTION 7 OF 20
Correct statements analyzing emission rates:
1. Emission per second is independent of the incident photon's momentum.
2. Greater number of available energy quanta means more electrons absorb them.
3. Low intensity causes a delay in emission because fewer photons arrive per second.
4. Emission rate is zero if the incident photons have energy less than the work function, regardless of intensity.
QUESTION 8 OF 20
Match List I (Change in experimental parameter) with List II (Effect on proportionality):
| List I | List II |
|---|---|
| 1. Double the intensity (same frequency) | a. Number of emitted photons per second decreases (since each photon has higher energy) |
| 2. Increase the frequency (same intensity in W/m²) | b. Saturation current doubles |
| 3. Change to a metal with lower work function | c. Photocurrent reduces to zero |
| 4. Apply stopping potential | d. Threshold frequency decreases |
QUESTION 9 OF 20
The reason the photocurrent eventually stops increasing and saturates at higher accelerating potentials is because
QUESTION 10 OF 20
Incorrect statement regarding the mechanics of retarding potential:
QUESTION 11 OF 20
Statements about the saturation state:
1. Different intensities I₃ > I₂ > I₁ yield different saturation currents.
2. For a given intensity, varying the frequency slightly changes the intensity definition.
3. Saturation current is independent of the accelerating potential once the threshold voltage is exceeded.
4. The stopping potential remains identical for I₃, I₂, I₁ assuming the same frequency.
QUESTION 12 OF 20
In the total electron collection regime (saturation), the role of space charge
QUESTION 13 OF 20
Using Einstein's photoelectric equation, the cut-off point V₀ when a retarding potential is applied is precisely:
QUESTION 14 OF 20
A sharply defined, critical value of negative potential V₀ exists because
QUESTION 15 OF 20
If the incident wavelength is 454 nm and the work function is 2.14 eV, what is the maximum kinetic energy in eV?
(hc/λ ≈ 19.89 × 10⁻¹⁹ J = 2.74 eV)
QUESTION 16 OF 20
Correct statements analyzing the failure of wave theory regarding maximum kinetic energy:
1. Wave theory predicted Kmax should increase with intensity.
2. Wave theory predicted Kmax is independent of frequency.
3. Experiments showed Kmax is determined solely by photon energy and work function.
4. Experiments showed tighter bound electrons emerge with Kmax.
QUESTION 17 OF 20
In Millikan's experimental verification, observing the shifts in stopping potential for different frequencies allowed the determination of ______, proving it was ______ of the nature of the material.
QUESTION 18 OF 20
Match List I (Graph features of V₀ vs ν) with List II (Physical constants):
| List I | List II |
|---|---|
| 1. Slope of the graph | a. -φ₀/e |
| 2. x-intercept (frequency axis) | b. φ₀/e |
| 3. y-intercept (potential axis) | c. ν₀ |
| 4. Value of V₀ at ν = 2ν₀ | d. h/e |
QUESTION 19 OF 20
Incorrect statement about the time factor in photoelectric emission:
QUESTION 20 OF 20
Statements concerning the nanosecond scale emission:
1. It proves energy is absorbed continuously over the wavefront.
2. It holds true even when the incident radiation is made exceedingly dim.
3. It demonstrates that intensity only determines how many electrons participate, not the time taken per electron.
4. It contradicts the classical wave picture of electromagnetism.
Test Complete!
Answer Review
1 Statements concerning the transmission of radiation through the experimental window:
1. If ordinary glass were used instead of quartz, zinc and magnesium might not exhibit photoelectric emission.
2. Alkali metals like lithium and sodium can exhibit emission even if the window only transmits visible light.
3. The quartz window strictly permits only visible light and blocks ultraviolet rays.
4. Transmitting UV radiation is crucial for materials with higher work functions.
�� Quartz transmits ultraviolet radiation. �� High work-function metals need UV light. �� Ordinary glass absorbs most UV radiation.
- Zinc and magnesium require ultraviolet radiation because of their relatively high work functions. Ordinary glass absorbs UV rays, so photoelectric emission may not occur if glass is used. → Statement 1 is correct. → Statement 2 is correct because alkali metals have lower work functions and can respond to visible light. → Statement 4 is correct because UV transmission is essential for metals requiring higher photon energies. → Statement 3 is incorrect because quartz transmits UV radiation rather than blocking it.
- �� Statement 3 → Opposite of the actual function of quartz.
Used
- �� Elimination
Application:
- �� Remove the statement contradicting the known UV-transmitting property of quartz.
Final Logic:
- �� Only statements 1, 2 and 4 are correct.
- Quartz = UV Gateway
2 By reversing the commutator polarity and precisely locating the cut-off potential, a physicist effectively measures
�� Stopping potential measures photoelectron energy. �� Retarding field opposes electron motion. �� Maximum kinetic energy is determined experimentally.
- By applying a retarding potential and finding the stopping potential V₀, the maximum kinetic energy of emitted photoelectrons is determined using: Kmax = eV₀ → Although the wording is slightly unconventional, the question intends measurement of the kinetic energy of emitted photoelectrons through the stopping potential method. → Therefore option B is the best available answer.
- �� Option A → Number of electrons is measured through photocurrent.
- �� Option C → Thermal emission is unrelated to photoelectric stopping potential.
- �� Option D → Wave amplitude is not measured using a commutator.
Used
- �� Elimination
Application:
- �� Select the option most closely related to stopping potential measurements.
Final Logic:
- �� Stopping potential directly provides photoelectron kinetic energy.
- Stop Voltage → Electron Energy
3 Incorrect statement about interpreting the voltmeter readings during the experiment:
�� Photocurrent is not proportional to voltage at all values. �� Saturation eventually occurs. �� Voltage affects collection efficiency.
- Initially, increasing positive potential increases photocurrent because more photoelectrons reach the collector. However, after saturation current is reached, further increases in voltage do not increase the current. → Therefore the photocurrent is not strictly proportional to V. → Hence option D is correct.
- �� Option A → Correct interpretation of positive potential.
- �� Option B → Correct because voltage influences collection efficiency.
- �� Option C → Correct definition of stopping potential.
Used
- �� Elimination
Application:
- �� Identify the statement contradicting the saturation current curve.
Final Logic:
- �� Photocurrent eventually saturates and is not always proportional to voltage.
- Voltage ↑, Current ↑ ... Then Saturates
4 For a constant frequency ν > ν₀, the saturation photocurrent I measured by the microammeter varies with the source distance r according to the relation:
�� Intensity follows inverse square law. �� Saturation current is proportional to intensity. �� Therefore current follows inverse square dependence.
- For a point source: Intensity ∝ 1/r² Since saturation current is proportional to intensity: I ∝ Intensity Therefore: I ∝ 1/r² → Hence option C is correct.
- �� Option A → Current does not increase with distance.
- �� Option B → Inverse dependence is weaker than actual relation.
- �� Option D → Opposite trend.
Used
- �� Substitution
Application:
- �� Combine inverse-square law with saturation current proportionality.
Final Logic:
- �� I ∝ r⁻².
- Double Distance → Quarter Current
5 When the source is moved closer to the emitter, the amplitude of electric and magnetic fields in the classical wave picture is ______, but in the photon picture, the energy of each individual photon remains ______.
�� Moving closer increases intensity. �� Field amplitudes increase. �� Photon energy depends only on frequency.
- In classical wave theory, greater intensity corresponds to larger electric and magnetic field amplitudes. → In the photon picture, the energy of an individual photon is: E = hν → Since frequency is unchanged, photon energy remains constant even though intensity increases. → Therefore option B is correct.
- �� Option A → Photon energy does not increase without frequency change.
- �� Option C → Field amplitudes do increase.
- �� Option D → Moving closer increases, not decreases, intensity.
Used
- �� Elimination
Application:
- �� Distinguish intensity effects from frequency effects.
Final Logic:
- �� Intensity changes amplitude, not photon energy.
- Intensity Changes Number, Frequency Changes Energy
6 The strict linearity between photocurrent and intensity fundamentally rules out
�� Photocurrent is directly proportional to intensity. �� One photon ejects one electron. �� Multi-photon processes would not generally produce strict linearity.
- The experimentally observed linear relationship between photocurrent and intensity indicates that the number of emitted electrons is directly proportional to the number of incident photons. → This supports the one-photon–one-electron interaction model proposed by Einstein. → If emission required simultaneous absorption of multiple photons under ordinary experimental conditions, the dependence would generally be nonlinear. → Therefore, option C is correct.
- �� Option A → Conservation of energy remains valid in photoelectric interactions.
- �� Option B → Linearity actually supports the particle nature of radiation.
- �� Option D → Threshold frequency is an experimentally verified property.
Used
- �� Elimination
Application:
- �� Reject options that are supported rather than contradicted by photoelectric observations.
Final Logic:
- �� Strict linearity supports single-photon absorption and rules out a multi-photon requirement.
- One Photon → One Electron
7 Correct statements analyzing emission rates:
1. Emission per second is independent of the incident photon's momentum.
2. Greater number of available energy quanta means more electrons absorb them.
3. Low intensity causes a delay in emission because fewer photons arrive per second.
4. Emission rate is zero if the incident photons have energy less than the work function, regardless of intensity.
�� Emission rate depends on photon availability. �� Photon energy must exceed work function. �� No measurable delay occurs even at low intensity.
- Statement 1 is correct because photoelectric emission depends primarily on photon energy rather than photon momentum. → Statement 2 is correct because increasing the number of available photons increases the probability of electron emission. → Statement 4 is correct because if hν < φ, photoelectric emission cannot occur regardless of intensity. → Statement 3 is incorrect because experiments show photoelectric emission occurs essentially instantaneously, even at very low intensities. → Therefore the correct combination is (1), (2), (4).
- �� Statement 3 → No measurable time lag is observed in photoelectric emission.
Used
- �� Elimination
Application:
- �� Remove the statement contradicting the experimentally observed instantaneous emission.
Final Logic:
- �� Statements 1, 2 and 4 are correct.
- Below Work Function → No Emission
8 Match List I (Change in experimental parameter) with List II (Effect on proportionality):
| List I | List II |
|---|---|
| 1. Double the intensity (same frequency) | a. Number of emitted photons per second decreases (since each photon has higher energy) |
| 2. Increase the frequency (same intensity in W/m²) | b. Saturation current doubles |
| 3. Change to a metal with lower work function | c. Photocurrent reduces to zero |
| 4. Apply stopping potential | d. Threshold frequency decreases |
�� Intensity affects saturation current. �� Higher frequency means higher energy per photon. �� Lower work function lowers threshold frequency.
- Therefore Option C is correct.
- �� Option A → Increasing frequency does not directly reduce photocurrent to zero.
- �� Option B → Intensity does not decrease photon count.
- �� Option D → Lower work function does not directly double saturation current.
Used
- �� Option Grouping
Application:
- �� Match each physical change with its direct experimental consequence.
Final Logic:
- �� Only Option A provides the correct set of pairings.
- Lower φ → Lower ν₀
9 The reason the photocurrent eventually stops increasing and saturates at higher accelerating potentials is because
�� Saturation means complete collection. �� No additional emitted electrons remain. �� Further voltage increase has no effect.
- As accelerating potential increases, a greater fraction of emitted photoelectrons reaches the collector. → Eventually every emitted photoelectron is collected. → At this stage the photocurrent reaches saturation current and cannot increase further. → Therefore option C is correct.
- �� Option A → Space-charge effects are not the fundamental reason for saturation.
- �� Option B → Collector capacity is not the limiting factor.
- �� Option D → Work function remains unchanged.
Used
- �� Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application:
- �� Relate saturation current to complete electron collection.
Final Logic:
- �� Saturation occurs when all emitted electrons are already collected.
- All Collected = Saturation
10 Incorrect statement regarding the mechanics of retarding potential:
�� Retarding potential acts after emission. �� Initial kinetic energy is fixed at emission. �� Frequency determines emitted kinetic energy.
- The kinetic energy with which electrons are emitted is determined by Einstein's equation: Kmax = hν − φ → Retarding potential acts only after the electrons have been emitted and influences whether they can reach the collector. → Therefore it does not alter the original kinetic energy of emission. → Hence option C is correct.
- �� Option A → Correct description of retarding force.
- �� Option B → Correct condition for reaching the collector.
- �� Option D → Correct interpretation of stopping potential.
Used
- �� Elimination
Application:
- �� Separate emission processes from post-emission motion.
Final Logic:
- �� Retarding potential affects electron motion, not emission energy.
- Frequency Sets Energy, Voltage Tests It
11 Statements about the saturation state:
1. Different intensities I₃ > I₂ > I₁ yield different saturation currents.
2. For a given intensity, varying the frequency slightly changes the intensity definition.
3. Saturation current is independent of the accelerating potential once the threshold voltage is exceeded.
4. The stopping potential remains identical for I₃, I₂, I₁ assuming the same frequency.
�� Saturation current depends on intensity. �� Stopping potential depends on frequency. �� Saturation current becomes independent of voltage after saturation.
- Statement 1 is correct because greater intensity produces more photoelectrons and hence larger saturation current. → Statement 3 is correct because once saturation is reached, increasing accelerating potential further does not increase photocurrent. → Statement 4 is correct because stopping potential depends on frequency and work function, not intensity. → Statement 2 is incorrect because frequency and intensity are independent physical quantities.
- �� Statement 2 → Changing frequency does not redefine intensity.
Used
- �� Elimination
Application:
- �� Separate intensity-dependent quantities from frequency-dependent quantities.
Final Logic:
- �� Statements 1, 3 and 4 are correct.
- Intensity → Current, Frequency → Voltage
12 In the total electron collection regime (saturation), the role of space charge
�� Strong positive potential attracts electrons. �� All emitted electrons are collected. �� Saturation current is achieved.
- Space charge refers to the cloud of emitted electrons that can oppose further electron motion. In the saturation region, the collector is sufficiently positive to overcome this effect and collect all emitted photoelectrons. → Therefore option B is correct.
- �� Option A → Space-charge limitation is not dominant in the saturation region.
- �� Option C → Electrons do not emit photons merely due to travel through the tube.
- �� Option D → Electrons are attracted toward the collector, not forced back.
Used
- �� Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application:
- �� Relate saturation current to complete electron collection.
Final Logic:
- �� Strong collector potential overcomes space-charge effects.
- Positive Collector Wins
13 Using Einstein's photoelectric equation, the cut-off point V₀ when a retarding potential is applied is precisely:
�� eV₀ = hν − φ₀ �� φ₀ = hν₀ �� Substitute and simplify.
- Einstein's equation: eV₀ = hν − φ₀ Since: φ₀ = hν₀ Therefore: eV₀ = h(ν − ν₀) Hence: V₀ = (h/e)(ν − ν₀) → Therefore, option A is correct.
- �� Option B → Reciprocal relationship is incorrect.
- �� Option C → Represents energy, not potential.
- �� Option D → Incorrect sign.
Used
- �� Substitution
Application:
- �� Substitute φ₀ = hν₀ into Einstein's equation.
Final Logic:
- �� V₀ = (h/e)(ν − ν₀).
- Stop Voltage = h/e × Excess Frequency
14 A sharply defined, critical value of negative potential V₀ exists because
�� Electrons emerge with varying kinetic energies. �� Maximum kinetic energy is well defined. �� Stopping potential corresponds to K_max.
- Photoelectrons are emitted with a range of kinetic energies from zero up to a maximum value K_max. → The stopping potential is the minimum retarding potential required to stop even the most energetic photoelectrons. → This leads to a sharply defined value of V₀. → Hence option A is correct.
- �� Option B → Electrons do not all have identical kinetic energy.
- �� Option C → Non-uniform fields are not the reason for stopping potential.
- �� Option D → Wave theory does not explain the sharp stopping potential.
Used
- �� Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application:
- �� Connect stopping potential directly to maximum kinetic energy.
Final Logic:
- �� A well-defined Kmax produces a well-defined stopping potential.
- Max Energy → Stop Voltage
15 If the incident wavelength is 454 nm and the work function is 2.14 eV, what is the maximum kinetic energy in eV?
(hc/λ ≈ 19.89 × 10⁻¹⁹ J = 2.74 eV)
�� Kmax = Photon Energy − Work Function. �� Photon energy = 2.74 eV. �� Work function = 2.14 eV.
- Using Einstein's equation: Kmax = hν − φ Given: Photon Energy = 2.74 eV Work Function = 2.14 eV Therefore: Kmax = 2.74 − 2.14 = 0.60 eV → Hence option C is correct.
- �� Option A → Sum rather than difference.
- �� Option B → Represents photon energy only.
- �� Option D → Numerical error.
Used
- �� Substitution
Application:
- �� Directly apply Einstein's photoelectric equation.
Final Logic:
- �� Kmax = 2.74 − 2.14 = 0.60 eV.
- Energy In − Energy Out
16 Correct statements analyzing the failure of wave theory regarding maximum kinetic energy:
1. Wave theory predicted Kmax should increase with intensity.
2. Wave theory predicted Kmax is independent of frequency.
3. Experiments showed Kmax is determined solely by photon energy and work function.
4. Experiments showed tighter bound electrons emerge with Kmax.
�� Classical theory linked energy to intensity. �� Experiments linked energy to frequency. �� Work function affects emitted energy.
- Statement 1 is correct because classical wave theory predicted greater intensity should transfer more energy and produce larger kinetic energies. → Statement 3 is correct because experiments established: Kmax = hν − φ → Statement 2 is incorrect because wave theory did not specifically predict frequency independence in this form. → Statement 4 is incorrect because Kmax depends on photon energy and work function, not on tighter bound electrons emerging preferentially.
- �� Statement 2 → Not the experimentally established conclusion.
- �� Statement 4 → Incorrect interpretation of photoelectron emission.
Used
- �� Elimination
Application:
- �� Compare wave-theory predictions with Einstein's explanation.
Final Logic:
- �� Statements 1 and 3 correctly describe the contrast.
- Wave → Intensity, Einstein → Frequency
17 In Millikan's experimental verification, observing the shifts in stopping potential for different frequencies allowed the determination of ______, proving it was ______ of the nature of the material.
�� Millikan verified Einstein's equation. �� Slope of V₀–ν graph equals h/e. �� Planck's constant is universal.
- From: V₀ = (h/e)ν − φ/e the slope of the V₀ versus ν graph is h/e. → By measuring this slope, Millikan determined Planck's constant and confirmed that it is independent of the material used. → Therefore option B is correct.
- �� Option A → Work function depends on material.
- �� Option C → Electron charge was already known and not the objective.
- �� Option D → Threshold frequency varies with material.
Used
- �� Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application:
- �� Connect slope measurement with determination of Planck's constant.
Final Logic:
- �� Millikan's experiment confirmed the universal value of h.
- Slope → h/e
18 Match List I (Graph features of V₀ vs ν) with List II (Physical constants):
| List I | List II |
|---|---|
| 1. Slope of the graph | a. -φ₀/e |
| 2. x-intercept (frequency axis) | b. φ₀/e |
| 3. y-intercept (potential axis) | c. ν₀ |
| 4. Value of V₀ at ν = 2ν₀ | d. h/e |
�� Slope = h/e. �� x-intercept = threshold frequency. �� y-intercept = −φ₀/e.
From: V₀ = (h/e)ν − φ₀/e → Therefore Option A is correct.
- �� Option B → Wrong sign for y-intercept.
- �� Option C → Multiple mismatches.
- �� Option D → Slope and intercepts incorrectly assigned.
Used
- �� Option Grouping
Application:
- �� Compare each graph feature with the straight-line equation.
Final Logic:
- �� Only Option A satisfies all graph relationships.
- Slope = h/e, Cutoff = ν₀
19 Incorrect statement about the time factor in photoelectric emission:
�� Photoemission is instantaneous. �� No measurable delay occurs. �� Even dim light can cause immediate emission.
- Experiments show that photoelectric emission begins almost immediately after illumination, with a time lag less than about 10⁻⁹ s. → This remains true even for very low intensities. → Therefore option A is correct.
- �� Option B → Correct photon explanation.
- �� Option C → Agrees with experiments.
- �� Option D → Correct criticism of classical wave theory.
Used
- �� Elimination
Application:
- �� Identify the statement contradicting experimental observations.
Final Logic:
- �� Low intensity affects rate, not emission delay.
- Dim Light ≠ Delay
20 Statements concerning the nanosecond scale emission:
1. It proves energy is absorbed continuously over the wavefront.
2. It holds true even when the incident radiation is made exceedingly dim.
3. It demonstrates that intensity only determines how many electrons participate, not the time taken per electron.
4. It contradicts the classical wave picture of electromagnetism.
�� Emission remains instantaneous. �� Intensity affects number of electrons. �� Classical wave theory fails to explain this behavior.
- Statement 2 is correct because instantaneous emission occurs even at extremely low intensities. → Statement 3 is correct because intensity determines the number of emitted electrons, not the emission time per electron. → Statement 4 is correct because classical wave theory predicted measurable delays. → Statement 1 is incorrect because instantaneous emission supports photon absorption, not continuous energy accumulation.
- �� Statement 1 → Contradicts Einstein's photon explanation.
Used
- �� Elimination
Application:
- �� Remove the statement inconsistent with experimental evidence.
Final Logic:
- �� Statements 2, 3 and 4 correctly describe nanosecond-scale emission.
- Instant Photon → Instant Electron
