CUET UG Physics Booster Test - 3 Electrostatic Potential Foundations
📌 Answers are locked once submitted — results and explanations appear at the end.
QUESTION 1 OF 20
If Wext is the work done by an external force and WE is the work done by a conservative electric force in bringing a charge slowly from R to P, their algebraic relationship is
QUESTION 2 OF 20
If the external force is abruptly removed halfway while a test charge is being pushed against an electrostatic field
QUESTION 3 OF 20
If the Coulomb force between two charges is F, what happens to the electrostatic potential energy if the distance r between the charges is tripled? (Recall force is proportional to 1/r² and potential energy to 1/r)
QUESTION 4 OF 20
When calculating work done against a static charge configuration to define potential energy
QUESTION 5 OF 20
Vector relationships during the charging process (External force & displacement, Electric force & displacement):
QUESTION 6 OF 20
Match List I with List II regarding energy expressions
| List I | List II |
|---|---|
| 1. UP − UR | a. WRP |
| 2. VP − VR | b. WRP / q |
| 3. Potential Energy Difference | c. Energy change between two points |
| 4. Potential Difference | d. Work done per unit charge |
QUESTION 7 OF 20
Characteristics of path-independence in electrostatics
1. It relies on the inverse-square nature of the Coulomb force
2. It validates the use of potential energy as a state function
3. It means the external force must be non-conservative
4. The right side of ΔU = WRP depends only on initial and final positions
QUESTION 8 OF 20
Incorrect statement regarding the verification of path independence
QUESTION 9 OF 20
Correct statements about the relativity of potential energy
1. The absolute value of potential energy is physically undetermined
2. Only potential energy differences have measurable physical consequences
3. Adding a constant α to all points alters the potential gradient
4. The zero-point reference can be shifted without changing the system's overall dynamics
QUESTION 10 OF 20
If an experimentalist measures a potential energy difference of ΔU = x Joules between two points, and another experimentalist shifts the zero reference level by +y Joules, the new potential difference ΔU' measured will be
QUESTION 11 OF 20
The choice of having electrostatic potential energy zero at infinity is
B.the reason why potential energy inside a solid conductor is zero
QUESTION 12 OF 20
If the electrostatic potential V at a point is 200 V, the work required by an external force to bring a -3 C charge from infinity to that point is
QUESTION 13 OF 20
Dividing the work done by the amount of test charge q is convenient because
QUESTION 14 OF 20
Dimensions for Potential Energy and Electrostatic Potential respectively:
QUESTION 15 OF 20
Match List I with List II regarding Volta's historical discoveries
| List I | List II |
|---|---|
| 1. Luigi Galvani's experimental conclusion | a. Large stack of moist cardboard disks sandwiched between metal disks |
| 2. Alessandro Volta's structural innovation | b. Electricity originates from exceptional property of animal tissue |
| 3. Voltaic pile | c. First practical battery producing continuous current |
| 4. Dissimilar metals | d. Source of electricity according to Volta's explanation |
QUESTION 16 OF 20
Components of the first voltaic pile
1. Disks of metal acting as electrodes
2. Moist disks of cardboard acting as electrolyte
3. Frog muscle tissue acting as an active biological separator
4. Stacked dissimilar metals
QUESTION 17 OF 20
Incorrect statement about taking the limit of dq approaching 0 for potential definition
QUESTION 18 OF 20
Correct statements about the necessity of holding the source charge Q fixed
1. If Q moves, the distance r changes, altering the calculated potential field
2. Q experiences a Coulomb force from the test charge q due to Newton's Third Law
3. Holding Q fixed violates the law of conservation of mechanical energy
4. An unspecified force is theoretically invoked to counter the force from q
QUESTION 19 OF 20
If an arbitrary electrostatic field E exerts a force on a test charge q, the net force on the test charge during infinitesimally slow displacement is
QUESTION 20 OF 20
If the external force applied to a test charge were greater than the opposing electrostatic force during its displacement
Test Complete!
Answer Review
1 If Wext is the work done by an external force and WE is the work done by a conservative electric force in bringing a charge slowly from R to P, their algebraic relationship is
�� The charge is moved slowly with no acceleration. �� External force balances electric force. �� Work done by the two forces is equal and opposite.
When a charge is moved slowly from point R to point P in an electrostatic field, the external force applied is equal in magnitude and opposite in direction to the electric force. Since the charge moves with infinitesimally slow constant speed, there is no change in kinetic energy. According to the work-energy principle, ΔK = Wext + WE Since ΔK = 0, Wext + WE = 0 This means that the work done by the external force is exactly equal and opposite to the work done by the electric force. The positive work done by the external force is stored as potential energy, while the electric field performs an equal amount of negative work. Thus, the correct answer is A. Wext + WE = 0.
- �� Option B → This implies both works have the same sign, which is incorrect.
- �� Option C → Since the charge moves slowly, ΔK = 0 and Wext is not equal to a kinetic energy change.
- �� Option D → Work done by the electric field is equal to the negative of the potential energy change.
Used: Substitution
Application:
- Using the work-energy theorem and the condition ΔK = 0 immediately gives the relation between the two works.
Final Logic:
- No kinetic energy change implies the sum of external and electric work must be zero.
- "External Plus Electric = Zero"
2 If the external force is abruptly removed halfway while a test charge is being pushed against an electrostatic field
�� Electrostatic force is conservative. �� Potential energy converts into kinetic energy. �� Mechanical energy remains constant.
While the external force is applied, energy is stored in the system as electrostatic potential energy. If the external force is suddenly removed, the electrostatic force becomes the only force acting on the charge. Since electrostatic force is conservative, the stored potential energy begins converting into kinetic energy. As the charge moves under the influence of the electric field, its kinetic energy increases while potential energy decreases by an equal amount. The total mechanical energy, Mechanical Energy = Kinetic Energy + Potential Energy remains constant throughout the motion. This is a direct consequence of conservation of mechanical energy in conservative force fields. Therefore, the stored potential energy supplies kinetic energy to the charge while total energy remains conserved. Thus, the correct answer is C. the stored potential energy is used to provide kinetic energy to the charge while total energy remains conserved.
- �� Option A → The charge will accelerate due to the electric force and not stop.
- �� Option B → Total mechanical energy remains conserved.
- �� Option D → Constant velocity requires zero net force, which is not the case.
Used: Elimination
Application:
- Recognizing that electrostatic forces are conservative eliminates options involving energy loss or constant velocity.
Final Logic:
- Potential energy converts into kinetic energy while total energy remains constant.
- "PE Falls, KE Rises"
3 If the Coulomb force between two charges is F, what happens to the electrostatic potential energy if the distance r between the charges is tripled? (Recall force is proportional to 1/r² and potential energy to 1/r)
�� Electrostatic potential energy varies as 1/r. �� Increasing distance reduces potential energy. �� Tripling distance reduces energy by a factor of three.
For two point charges, U ∝ 1/r where U is electrostatic potential energy and r is the separation between the charges. If the distance is tripled, r' = 3r Then, U' ∝ 1/(3r) U' = U/3 Thus, the electrostatic potential energy becomes one-third of its original value. The question reminds us that force varies as 1/r², but potential energy varies as 1/r. Therefore, the reduction factor for energy is different from that for force. Hence, when the separation is tripled, the electrostatic potential energy decreases to one-third of its original value. Thus, the correct answer is B. It decreases to 1/3 of its original value.
- �� Option A → 1/9 applies to force, not potential energy.
- �� Option C → Potential energy decreases rather than increases.
- �� Option D → Potential energy does not increase when distance increases.
Used: Substitution
Application:
- Substituting 3r into the proportionality U ∝ 1/r directly yields the answer.
Final Logic:
- Tripling r makes potential energy one-third of its original value.
- "Force Square, Energy Single"
4 When calculating work done against a static charge configuration to define potential energy
�� Negative work occurs when force and displacement are opposite. �� Electrostatic work depends on relative directions. �� Potential energy increases when moving against the field.
Work done by a force is given by the dot product of force and displacement. W = F · s When a positive charge is moved against the direction of the electric force, the displacement is opposite to the force. Therefore, the angle between force and displacement is 180°, making the work done by the electric field negative. This negative work corresponds to an increase in potential energy of the system. Such situations commonly occur when an external agent pushes a charge against a repulsive electrostatic force. Therefore, for the work done by the electric field to be negative, displacement must occur opposite to the electric force. Thus, the correct answer is D. the displacement must be in an opposite sense to the electric force for the work done by the electric field to be negative.
- �� Option A → Test charges must be very small and should not disturb the field.
- �� Option B → Work done by the electric force can be positive or negative depending on direction.
- �� Option C → Electrostatic potential energy is path independent.
Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application:
- Determining the relative directions of force and displacement identifies the sign of work done.
Final Logic:
- Opposite directions of force and displacement produce negative work.
- "Opposite Direction = Negative Work"
5 Vector relationships during the charging process (External force & displacement, Electric force & displacement):
�� External force pushes the charge along the displacement. �� Electric force opposes the motion. �� Slow movement requires balanced forces.
When a positive test charge is moved against an electrostatic force, an external force is applied in the direction of displacement. Therefore, the external force and displacement vectors are parallel. The electric force acts opposite to the intended displacement because the charge is being pushed against the field. Hence, the electric force and displacement vectors are antiparallel. This arrangement ensures that the external force performs positive work while the electric field performs negative work. The charge is moved slowly so that the two forces balance each other and no acceleration occurs. Thus: External force & displacement → Parallel Electric force & displacement → Antiparallel Therefore, the correct answer is A. Parallel, Antiparallel.
- �� Option B → Reverses the actual directions of the forces.
- �� Option C → Electric force is not parallel to displacement in this situation.
- �� Option D → External force acts along the displacement, not opposite to it.
Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application:
- Visualizing the directions of force and displacement immediately identifies the correct vector relationship.
Final Logic:
- External force aids displacement while electric force opposes it.
- "External Along, Electric Against"
6 Match List I with List II regarding energy expressions
| List I | List II |
|---|---|
| 1. UP − UR | a. WRP |
| 2. VP − VR | b. WRP / q |
| 3. Potential Energy Difference | c. Energy change between two points |
| 4. Potential Difference | d. Work done per unit charge |
�� Potential energy difference equals external work done. �� Potential difference equals work done per unit charge. �� Both quantities are path independent.
In electrostatics, the change in potential energy when a charge moves from R to P is given by UP − UR = WRP where WRP is the work done by the external force. The corresponding potential difference is defined as VP − VR = WRP/q Thus, potential difference is simply the work done per unit charge. Potential energy difference represents the total energy change, whereas potential difference represents energy change per unit charge. Therefore, 1 → a 2 → b 3 → c 4 → d These relations are fundamental to the NCERT definitions of electrostatic potential energy and electrostatic potential.
- �� Option A → Interchanges potential difference and potential energy difference.
- �� Option C → Incorrectly matches physical quantities and definitions.
- �� Option D → Assigns the same expression to both quantities.
Used: Substitution
Application:
- Using the standard definitions of potential energy difference and potential difference directly yields the correct matching.
Final Logic:
- Energy difference equals work done; potential difference equals work done per unit charge.
- "Energy = Work, Potential = Work/Charge"
7 Characteristics of path-independence in electrostatics
1. It relies on the inverse-square nature of the Coulomb force
2. It validates the use of potential energy as a state function
3. It means the external force must be non-conservative
4. The right side of ΔU = WRP depends only on initial and final positions
�� Coulomb force is conservative. �� Potential energy is a state function. �� Work depends only on end points.
The path independence of electrostatic work follows from the conservative nature of Coulomb's force. Since Coulomb's force is an inverse-square central force, the work done between two points depends only on the initial and final positions. Because work is path independent, potential energy can be defined as a state function. This means the value of potential energy depends only on the state of the system and not on the path used to reach that state. Statement 3 is incorrect because the external force need not be non-conservative. It is simply applied to balance the electric force during slow displacement. Thus, Statements 1, 2 and 4 are correct. Therefore, the correct answer is A. 1, 2 and 4 are correct.
- �� Option B → Statement 3 is incorrect.
- �� Option C → Statement 3 is incorrect and Statement 2 is omitted.
- �� Option D → Includes Statement 3, which is false.
Used: Elimination
Application:
- Identifying the incorrect statement about external force quickly narrows down the correct option.
Final Logic:
- Path independence makes potential energy a state function and depends only on end points.
- "End Points Matter"
8 Incorrect statement regarding the verification of path independence
�� Electrostatic field lines do not form closed loops. �� Electrostatic force is conservative. �� Path independence follows from Coulomb's law.
Electrostatic fields produced by static charges are conservative. Their field lines originate from positive charges and terminate on negative charges; they do not form closed loops. The path independence of electrostatic work can be mathematically established using Coulomb's law and vector calculus. This proof confirms that electrostatic force is conservative and that the work done depends only on the initial and final positions. Statement B is incorrect because closed continuous loops are characteristic of certain magnetic field lines, not electrostatic field lines. Therefore, the correct answer is B. It relies on the fact that electric fields due to static charges form closed continuous loops.
- �� Option A → Correctly states the conservative nature of Coulomb force.
- �� Option C → Correct because mathematical proof uses Coulomb's law.
- �� Option D → Correctly describes the implication of path independence.
Used: Elimination
Application:
- Recognizing the nature of electrostatic field lines helps identify the incorrect statement.
Final Logic:
- Electrostatic field lines are not closed loops.
- "Electrostatic Lines End, Not Loop"
9 Correct statements about the relativity of potential energy
1. The absolute value of potential energy is physically undetermined
2. Only potential energy differences have measurable physical consequences
3. Adding a constant α to all points alters the potential gradient
4. The zero-point reference can be shifted without changing the system's overall dynamics
�� Potential energy is defined up to a constant. �� Energy differences are physically meaningful. �� Changing the reference level does not alter physics.
Potential energy is not uniquely defined because an arbitrary constant can be added to all potential energy values. Therefore, the absolute value of potential energy is physically undetermined. Only potential energy differences can be measured experimentally because they determine work done and energy transfer. If the zero-point reference is shifted by a constant amount, all potential energies change equally, but the differences remain unchanged. Statement 3 is incorrect because adding a constant does not affect the potential gradient. Gradients depend on differences, and constants disappear during differentiation. Thus, Statements 1, 2 and 4 are correct. Therefore, the correct answer is B. 1, 2 and 4 are correct.
- �� Option A → Statement 3 is incorrect.
- �� Option C → Includes Statement 3, which is false.
- �� Option D → Statement 3 is incorrect and Statement 2 is omitted.
Used: Elimination
Application:
- The principle that only energy differences matter helps eliminate the incorrect statement.
Final Logic:
- Adding a constant changes values but not measurable physics.
- "Shift Zero, Physics Same"
10 If an experimentalist measures a potential energy difference of ΔU = x Joules between two points, and another experimentalist shifts the zero reference level by +y Joules, the new potential difference ΔU' measured will be
�� Potential energy differences are independent of reference level. �� Equal constants cancel during subtraction. �� Measurable energy changes remain unchanged.
Suppose the potential energies at two points are U1 and U2. The potential energy difference is ΔU = U2 − U1 = x If the reference level is shifted by adding a constant y to every potential energy value, the new energies become U1 + y and U2 + y The new potential energy difference becomes (U2 + y) − (U1 + y) = U2 − U1 = x The constant y cancels completely. Therefore, changing the zero reference level does not alter the measured potential energy difference. This is why only energy differences have physical significance in electrostatics. Thus, the correct answer is C. x.
- �� Option A → The constant does not add to the energy difference.
- �� Option B → The constant does not subtract from the energy difference.
- �� Option D → This expression has no physical basis.
Used: Substitution
Application:
- Adding the constant to both energy values demonstrates immediate cancellation.
Final Logic:
- Reference shifts affect absolute values but not differences.
- "Constant Cancels"
11 The choice of having electrostatic potential energy zero at infinity is
B.the reason why potential energy inside a solid conductor is zero
�� Potential energy requires a reference point. �� Infinity is chosen for convenience. �� Coulomb interaction approaches zero at large distances.
Electrostatic potential energy is defined only up to an arbitrary additive constant. Therefore, a reference point must be chosen. In electrostatics, infinity is commonly selected because the Coulomb force and interaction energy become negligibly small as the separation between charges approaches infinity. This choice simplifies calculations and allows potential energy at any point to be defined as the work done in bringing a charge from infinity to that point. It is a convention rather than a mathematical necessity. Thus, the correct answer is D. a convenient choice because the Coulomb interaction inherently vanishes at infinite separation.
- �� Option A → The reference point can be chosen differently; infinity is a convenient convention.
- �� Option B → Potential energy inside a conductor is not zero because of this convention.
- �� Option C → The choice applies to all charges, not only negative charges.
Used: Elimination
Application:
- Understanding the purpose of a reference point removes the incorrect statements.
Final Logic:
- Infinity is chosen because electrostatic interaction becomes negligible there.
- "Infinity = Natural Zero"
12 If the electrostatic potential V at a point is 200 V, the work required by an external force to bring a -3 C charge from infinity to that point is
�� Potential energy is given by U = qV. �� Charge is negative. �� Work done equals change in potential energy.
The work done by an external force in bringing a charge from infinity to a point is equal to the change in electrostatic potential energy. Using U = qV Given: q = -3 C V = 200 V Therefore, U = (-3)(200) U = -600 J Since the potential energy at infinity is taken as zero, the work done by the external force equals the final potential energy. Hence, W = -600 J The negative sign indicates that the system loses potential energy because a negative charge is brought to a region of positive potential. Thus, the correct answer is C -600 J.
- �� Option A → Ignores the negative sign of the charge.
- �� Option B → Incorrect numerical calculation.
- �� Option D → Uses an incorrect magnitude.
Used: Substitution
Application:
- Substituting the values directly into U = qV gives the required result.
Final Logic:
- Potential energy equals charge multiplied by potential.
- "Negative Charge → Negative U"
13 Dividing the work done by the amount of test charge q is convenient because
�� Potential is work done per unit charge. �� Potential depends only on source charges. �� It is independent of the test charge used.
Electrostatic potential is defined as the work done per unit positive test charge in bringing it from infinity to a given point. By dividing the work done by the test charge, the dependence on the test charge magnitude is removed. The resulting quantity depends only on the source charge configuration and the electric field it produces. Therefore, electrostatic potential becomes a property of the field itself rather than of the test charge used to measure it. This is why electrostatic potential is regarded as a characteristic of the electric field associated with the source charges. Thus, the correct answer is B. the resulting quantity represents a characteristic of the electric field associated purely with the source charge configuration.
- �� Option A → The inverse-square dependence is not artificially cancelled.
- �� Option C → Potential is defined from work per unit charge, not for converting vectors into scalars.
- �� Option D → The sign of charges remains physically important.
Used: Elimination
Application:
- Recalling the definition of potential immediately identifies its purpose.
Final Logic:
- Potential is a field property independent of the test charge.
- "Potential Belongs to Field"
14 Dimensions for Potential Energy and Electrostatic Potential respectively:
�� Potential energy has dimensions of work. �� Potential equals energy per unit charge. �� Charge dimension is AT.
Potential energy has the same dimensions as work and energy: [Potential Energy] = [M¹ L² T⁻²] Electrostatic potential is defined as energy per unit charge: V = U/q The dimension of charge is [Q] = [AT] Therefore, [V] = [M¹ L² T⁻²]/[AT] = [M¹ L² T⁻³ A⁻¹] Hence, the dimensions are: Potential Energy → [M¹ L² T⁻²] Potential → [M¹ L² T⁻³ A⁻¹] Thus, the correct answer is A.
- �� Option B → Reverses the dimensions of energy and potential.
- �� Option C → Uses incorrect power of length.
- �� Option D → Missing the required T⁻³ term.
Used: Dimensional/Unit Analysis
Application:
- Using V = U/q directly yields the dimension of potential.
Final Logic:
- Potential = Energy ÷ Charge.
- "Potential = Joule per Coulomb"
15 Match List I with List II regarding Volta's historical discoveries
| List I | List II |
|---|---|
| 1. Luigi Galvani's experimental conclusion | a. Large stack of moist cardboard disks sandwiched between metal disks |
| 2. Alessandro Volta's structural innovation | b. Electricity originates from exceptional property of animal tissue |
| 3. Voltaic pile | c. First practical battery producing continuous current |
| 4. Dissimilar metals | d. Source of electricity according to Volta's explanation |
�� Galvani proposed animal electricity. �� Volta developed the voltaic pile. �� Dissimilar metals were crucial to Volta's explanation.
Luigi Galvani concluded from his frog-leg experiments that electricity originated from a special property of animal tissue. Alessandro Volta disagreed and proposed that electricity was produced by the interaction of dissimilar metals separated by a moist conducting medium. Volta's structural innovation was the voltaic pile, a large stack of alternating metal disks separated by moist cardboard. This device became the first practical battery capable of producing a continuous electric current. Therefore: 1 → b 2 → a 3 → c 4 → d This matching accurately reflects the historical development of electricity discussed in NCERT.
- �� Option A → Galvani's and Volta's ideas are interchanged.
- �� Option C → Historical concepts are incorrectly matched.
- �� Option D → Multiple pairings do not correspond to established historical facts.
Used: Elimination
Application:
- Remembering Galvani's animal electricity and Volta's battery helps identify the correct matching.
Final Logic:
- Galvani → Animal Electricity; Volta → Voltaic Pile.
- "Galvani = Frog, Volta = Battery"
16 Components of the first voltaic pile
1. Disks of metal acting as electrodes
2. Moist disks of cardboard acting as electrolyte
3. Frog muscle tissue acting as an active biological separator
4. Stacked dissimilar metals
�� Voltaic pile used dissimilar metals. �� Moist cardboard acted as electrolyte. �� Frog tissue was not a component of the battery.
The first voltaic pile was invented by Alessandro Volta and is considered the first practical battery. It consisted of alternating disks of dissimilar metals such as zinc and copper. Between these metal disks were moist cardboard or cloth separators soaked in an electrolyte solution. The metal disks functioned as electrodes, while the moist cardboard provided ionic conduction necessary for the chemical reactions producing electric current. Frog muscle tissue was associated with Galvani's experiments on animal electricity and was not a component of Volta's battery. Therefore, Statements 1, 2 and 4 are correct, while Statement 3 is incorrect. Thus, the correct answer is A. 1, 2 and 4 are correct.
- �� Option B → Includes Statement 3, which is incorrect.
- �� Option C → Includes Statement 3 and omits Statement 1.
- �� Option D → Includes Statement 3, which was not part of the voltaic pile.
Used: Elimination
Application:
- Recalling the structure of the voltaic pile immediately identifies the incorrect biological component.
Final Logic:
- Voltaic pile used metals and electrolyte layers, not frog tissue.
- "Metal–Moist–Metal"
17 Incorrect statement about taking the limit of dq approaching 0 for potential definition
�� Test charge is taken infinitesimally small. �� Source configuration must remain unchanged. �� Potential does not become zero because dq approaches zero.
In defining electrostatic potential, the test charge dq is assumed to be infinitesimally small. This ensures that it does not disturb the source charges responsible for creating the electric field. The electric field and potential being measured therefore remain unchanged. The limit dq → 0 is introduced only to avoid modifying the original charge configuration. It does not imply that the potential itself becomes zero. Electrostatic potential is a property of the source charges and can have any value depending on the charge distribution. Therefore, Statement C is incorrect because the value of potential does not become universally zero when dq approaches zero. Thus, the correct answer is C. It mathematically ensures the potential V at the point becomes universally zero.
- �� Option A → Correctly describes why dq is chosen very small.
- �� Option B → Correct because a negligible test charge creates negligible disturbance.
- �� Option D → Correct since keeping source charges effectively fixed is one objective.
Used: Elimination
Application:
- Recognizing the purpose of an infinitesimal test charge eliminates the incorrect statement.
Final Logic:
- dq → 0 prevents disturbance; it does not make potential zero.
- "Tiny Charge, Same Potential"
18 Correct statements about the necessity of holding the source charge Q fixed
1. If Q moves, the distance r changes, altering the calculated potential field
2. Q experiences a Coulomb force from the test charge q due to Newton's Third Law
3. Holding Q fixed violates the law of conservation of mechanical energy
4. An unspecified force is theoretically invoked to counter the force from q
�� Source charge must remain fixed. �� Coulomb interaction acts on both charges. �� An external constraint may be assumed.
During the definition of electrostatic potential, the source charge configuration is assumed fixed. If the source charge Q were allowed to move, the separation distance r would change continuously, altering the electric field and potential being measured. According to Newton's Third Law, the test charge q exerts an equal and opposite Coulomb force on Q. Therefore, in theory, an unspecified external force is assumed to hold Q fixed against this force. Statement 3 is incorrect because holding Q fixed does not violate conservation of mechanical energy. It is simply an idealized condition used to define the field and potential. Therefore, Statements 1, 2 and 4 are correct. Thus, the correct answer is B. 1, 2 and 4 are correct.
- �� Option A → Statement 3 is incorrect.
- �� Option C → Includes Statement 3, which is false.
- �� Option D → Statement 3 is incorrect and Statement 2 is omitted.
Used: Elimination
Application:
- Understanding why the source charge is fixed identifies the incorrect statement.
Final Logic:
- Source charges remain fixed so that the field configuration remains unchanged.
- "Fix Source, Fix Field"
19 If an arbitrary electrostatic field E exerts a force on a test charge q, the net force on the test charge during infinitesimally slow displacement is
�� Charge moves with infinitesimally slow constant speed. �� External force balances electric force. �� Net force becomes zero.
The electric force acting on the charge is FE = qE To move the charge infinitesimally slowly, an external force of equal magnitude and opposite direction is applied. Fext = -qE Therefore, Fnet = FE + Fext = qE + (-qE) = 0 Since the net force is zero, the acceleration is also zero. This condition ensures that there is no change in kinetic energy and that all external work contributes to changing potential energy. Thus, the correct answer is D. 0.
- �� Option A → Represents only the electric force, not the net force.
- �� Option B → Represents only the external force.
- �� Option C → Would occur if forces acted in the same direction.
Used: Substitution
Application:
- Substituting the expressions for electric and external forces directly gives the net force.
Final Logic:
- Equal and opposite forces cancel completely.
- "Slow Motion = Zero Net Force"
20 If the external force applied to a test charge were greater than the opposing electrostatic force during its displacement
�� External force should exactly balance electric force. �� Excess force produces acceleration. �� Acceleration changes kinetic energy.
The definition of electrostatic potential energy assumes that the charge is moved infinitesimally slowly so that there is no change in kinetic energy. This requires the external force to exactly balance the electrostatic force. If the external force becomes greater than the opposing electric force, a non-zero net force acts on the charge. According to Newton's second law, this net force causes acceleration and increases the kinetic energy of the charge. As a result, part of the work done by the external force goes into kinetic energy rather than entirely into potential energy. This violates the strict condition used in defining potential energy difference. Therefore, the correct answer is B. the charge would acquire kinetic energy, violating the strict definition of potential energy difference.
- �� Option A → Not all excess work becomes potential energy; some becomes kinetic energy.
- �� Option C → Electric field direction does not reverse due to excess external force.
- �� Option D → A test charge does not transform into a source charge.
Used: Elimination
Application:
- Recognizing that excess force produces acceleration eliminates the unrealistic alternatives.
Final Logic:
- Greater external force causes acceleration and kinetic energy gain.
- "Extra Force → Extra KE"
