CUET UG Physics Booster Test 2--Motional EMF and Lorentz Force
📌 Answers are locked once submitted — results and explanations appear at the end.
QUESTION 1 OF 20
Identify the incorrect statement about a straight conductor moving in a field:
QUESTION 2 OF 20
Match List I with List II regarding velocity and field interaction.
| List I | List II |
|---|---|
| (1) Constant velocity v | (a) Blx |
| (2) Magnetic flux ΦB | (b) Forms a closed circuit |
| (3) Decreasing x | (c) Increases the rate of area change negatively |
| (4) Loop PQRS | (d) −dx/dt |
QUESTION 3 OF 20
If the length of the conductor is l, its velocity is v, and the magnetic field is B, the rate of change of area is given by the product of l and the velocity v. Thus, if x is the distance that changes with time, the derivative -dx/dt represents
QUESTION 4 OF 20
A rectangular wire loop of sides 8 cm and 2 cm with a small cut is moving out of a uniform magnetic field of 0.3 T normal to the loop. What is the motional emf developed across the cut if the velocity of the loop is 1 cm s⁻¹ normal to the longer side?
QUESTION 5 OF 20
Identify the Correct Statements regarding force on Charge Carriers
(1) The Lorentz force acts on free charge carriers in the moving conductor.
(2) The charge moves with speed v in the magnetic field B.
(3) The Lorentz force magnitude is qvB.
(4) Only positive charges experience the Lorentz force in the rod.
QUESTION 6 OF 20
In a moving conductor PQ, the magnetic force directs the free charge carriers, and the work is done to move them across length l. The relationship between force position-dependence and the resultant work is:
QUESTION 7 OF 20
Choose the correct Statements about work done on charges in motional EMF
(1) The work done is calculated as W = qvBl.
(2) Work is done by the magnetic force to move the charge from P to Q.
(3) The expression for work is independent of the magnetic field strength.
(4) The work done gives rise to the induced emf across the rod.
QUESTION 8 OF 20
The principle of EMF as Work per Charge implies:
1. implies that ε = q / W
2. states that emf is the work done per unit charge, yielding ε = Blv
3. is only valid for stationary charges
4. contradicts Faraday's law of induction
Choose the correct option:
QUESTION 9 OF 20
When explaining the existence of induced emf in a stationary conductor, we must assume that
QUESTION 10 OF 20
Choose the incorrect statement about induced electric fields:
QUESTION 11 OF 20
If a metallic rod is rotated in a uniform magnetic field, the free electrons get distributed over the ring due to the Lorentz force. Thus, if a steady state is reached at a certain value of emf, the net flow of electrons along the rod will be
QUESTION 12 OF 20
In a rotating metallic rod, the accumulation of free electrons and the resulting potential behavior are:
QUESTION 13 OF 20
Match List I with List II regarding the integration of segment EMF in a rotating rod.
| List I | List II |
|---|---|
| (1) Velocity of segment dr | (a) Bvdr |
| (2) Elemental emf dε | (b) rω |
| (3) Total emf limits | (c) ½BωR² |
| (4) Total emf expression | (d) 0 to R |
QUESTION 14 OF 20
Choose the correct statements regarding angular speed relations in a rotating rod:
(1) The linear velocity v is related to angular speed ω by v = ωr.
(2) The angular speed ω equals 2πν, where ν is frequency.
(3) The linear velocity v is uniform across the entire rod length.
(4) Substituting v = ωr into the integration yields ε = 1/2 BωR².
QUESTION 15 OF 20
The rate of change of area method:
Choose correct:
QUESTION 16 OF 20
If the radius R of the circle swept by the rod is 2.0 m, the uniform magnetic field B is 0.5 T, and the rod rotates such that the rate of change of angle dθ/dt is 10 rad/s, what is the induced emf using the area of sector equation?
QUESTION 17 OF 20
Choose the correct Statements Regarding the Axle and Rim Potential of a Rotating Wheel in a Magnetic Field
(1) An induced emf develops between the axle and the rim.
(2) The wheel acts like a rotating metallic rod with length equal to its radius.
(3) The induced emf is calculated using ε = ½ωBR².
(4) Adding more identical spokes in parallel increases the total output voltage.
QUESTION 18 OF 20
In a wheel with multiple metallic spokes rotating in a magnetic field, the number of spokes is immaterial to the total induced emf because
QUESTION 19 OF 20
Incorrect statement about the effects of the horizontal component of earth's magnetic field (HE):
QUESTION 20 OF 20
If a horizontal straight wire extending east to west falls with a speed v at right angles to the horizontal component of the earth's magnetic field B, the motional emf induced depends on its length l, speed v, and B. Thus, if the wire's length is 10 m, falling at 5.0 m/s in a field of 0.30 × 10⁻⁴ T, the instantaneous emf will be
Test Complete!
Answer Review
1 Identify the incorrect statement about a straight conductor moving in a field:
�� Motional emf can exist in an open conductor. �� Closed circuit is needed for current, not emf. �� Magnetic force separates charges in the rod.
- A moving conductor in a magnetic field experiences charge separation due to the Lorentz force. This creates a potential difference (emf) across its ends even if the conductor is not part of a closed circuit. → Option A is incorrect because a closed loop is required for induced current, not for induced emf. → Option B is used in the standard derivation of motional emf. → Option C is a common assumption in deriving ε = Blv. → Option D is generally assumed to simplify energy considerations.
- �� Option B → Correct assumption used in deriving motional emf.
- �� Option C → Constant velocity is assumed in standard derivations.
- �� Option D → Frictionless motion simplifies analysis and avoids energy dissipation.
Used
- �� Elimination
Application:
- �� Check which statement contradicts the basic concept of motional emf.
Final Logic:
- �� Emf can exist without a closed loop; only current requires a closed path.
- "EMF first, current later."
2 Match List I with List II regarding velocity and field interaction.
| List I | List II |
|---|---|
| (1) Constant velocity v | (a) Blx |
| (2) Magnetic flux ΦB | (b) Forms a closed circuit |
| (3) Decreasing x | (c) Increases the rate of area change negatively |
| (4) Loop PQRS | (d) −dx/dt |
Velocity is related to the decreasing position coordinate by v = −dx/dt. Magnetic flux through the loop is ΦB = Blx. A decreasing x reduces the enclosed area. PQRS represents the closed conducting loop.
- (1) Constant velocity v As the loop moves and x decreases with time, v = −dx/dt → 1 → d → (2) Magnetic flux ΦB Magnetic flux through the loop is ΦB = BA = B(lx) = Blx → 2 → a → (3) Decreasing x A decrease in x reduces the area enclosed within the magnetic field, producing a negative rate of area change. → 3 → c → (4) Loop PQRS PQRS is the conducting path through which induced current flows, forming a closed circuit. → 4 → b Therefore: 1 → d 2 → a 3 → c 4 → b Hence, Option A is correct.
- Option B: Incorrectly interchanges flux and velocity relations.
- Option C: Incorrectly matches magnetic flux with the closed loop.
- Option D: Assigns incorrect meanings to all major quantities.
Used
- Option Grouping
Application:
- Match each physical quantity with its mathematical expression or physical description.
Final Logic:
- Velocity → −dx/dt
- Flux → Blx
- Decreasing x → Negative area change
- PQRS → Closed conducting loop
"Flux = Blx, Velocity = −dx/dt"
3 If the length of the conductor is l, its velocity is v, and the magnetic field is B, the rate of change of area is given by the product of l and the velocity v. Thus, if x is the distance that changes with time, the derivative -dx/dt represents
�� Velocity is rate of change of position. �� x decreases with time. �� v = -dx/dt.
- In motional emf derivation, area changes because the rod moves. → If x decreases with time, velocity magnitude is v = -dx/dt. → Therefore the derivative represents speed of the conductor.
- �� Option A → Acceleration is d²x/dt².
- �� Option C → No magnetic field variation involved.
- �� Option D → Derivative of position does not represent force.
Used
- �� Substitution
Application:
- �� Replace v directly with -dx/dt.
Final Logic:
- �� Velocity is defined as rate of change of position.
- "Position → Velocity → One derivative."
4 A rectangular wire loop of sides 8 cm and 2 cm with a small cut is moving out of a uniform magnetic field of 0.3 T normal to the loop. What is the motional emf developed across the cut if the velocity of the loop is 1 cm s⁻¹ normal to the longer side?
�� ε = Blv. �� l = 2 cm = 0.02 m. �� ε = 0.3 × 0.02 × 0.01.
- Velocity is normal to the longer side (8 cm), therefore the effective length cutting flux is 2 cm. → ε = Blv = 0.3 × 0.02 × 0.01 = 6 × 10⁻⁵ V = 0.6 × 10⁻⁴ V → The provided answer (A) is incorrect.
- �� Option A → Uses wrong effective length.
- �� Option C → Ten times larger than actual value.
- �� Option D → Incorrect power of ten.
Used
- �� Substitution
Application:
- �� Substitute values directly into ε = Blv.
Final Logic:
- �� Correct effective length is 2 cm, giving 0.6 × 10⁻⁴ V.
- "Length cutting flux matters."
5 Identify the Correct Statements regarding force on Charge Carriers
(1) The Lorentz force acts on free charge carriers in the moving conductor.
(2) The charge moves with speed v in the magnetic field B.
(3) The Lorentz force magnitude is qvB.
(4) Only positive charges experience the Lorentz force in the rod.
Lorentz force acts on all moving charge carriers. The magnitude of magnetic force is qvB when v ⊥ B. Both positive and negative charges experience magnetic force. Therefore, statement (4) is incorrect.
- Statement (1) is correct. Free charge carriers in a moving conductor experience the Lorentz force when moving through a magnetic field. → Statement (2) is correct. The charge carriers move with the conductor at speed v through the magnetic field B. → Statement (3) is correct. For motion perpendicular to the magnetic field, F = qvB Hence, the Lorentz force magnitude is qvB. → Statement (4) is incorrect. The Lorentz force acts on all moving charges, whether positive or negative. The force direction differs for opposite charges, but both experience the force. Therefore, the correct statements are: (1), (2), and (3) Hence, Option A is correct.
- Option B: Includes statement (4), which is false.
- Option C: Includes statement (4), which is false.
- Option D: Includes statement (4), which is false.
Used
- Elimination
Application:
- Apply the Lorentz force law to moving charges in a magnetic field.
Final Logic:
- All moving charges experience magnetic force.
- The force magnitude is qvB for perpendicular motion.
- Negative charges are not exempt from magnetic force.
"Positive or Negative, Both Feel the Force"
6 In a moving conductor PQ, the magnetic force directs the free charge carriers, and the work is done to move them across length l. The relationship between force position-dependence and the resultant work is:
�� Magnetic force magnitude = qvB. �� Work = Force × distance. �� W = qvBl.
- The magnetic force on charge q is qvB. → Over distance l: W = qvBl → Force remains constant for uniform B and constant v.
- �� Option A → Missing displacement factor l.
- �� Option C → Incorrect dimensional form.
- �� Option D → Uses electric field expression.
Used
- �� Dimensional/Unit Analysis
Application:
- �� Verify which expression has dimensions of work.
Final Logic:
- �� Only qvBl gives correct work expression.
- "Force × length = qvBl."
7 Choose the correct Statements about work done on charges in motional EMF
(1) The work done is calculated as W = qvBl.
(2) Work is done by the magnetic force to move the charge from P to Q.
(3) The expression for work is independent of the magnetic field strength.
(4) The work done gives rise to the induced emf across the rod.
The work associated with charge separation is W = qvBl. This work results in a potential difference (emf) across the rod. The work depends directly on the magnetic field strength B. Therefore, statement (3) is incorrect.
- Statement (1) is correct. The work done in moving a charge q across a rod of length l moving with speed v in a magnetic field B is: W = qvBl → Statement (2) is correct. The magnetic force causes charge separation between the ends of the conductor, effectively moving charges from one end to the other. → Statement (3) is incorrect. Since W = qvBl the work done depends directly on B. Hence, it is not independent of magnetic field strength. → Statement (4) is correct. The work done per unit charge produces the induced emf across the rod: ε = W/q = Blv Therefore, the correct statements are: (1), (2), and (4) Hence, Option B is correct.
- Option A: Includes statement (3), which is false.
- Option C: Includes statement (3), which is false.
- Option D: Includes statement (3), which is false.
Used
- Elimination
Application:
- Use the relations:
- W = qvBl
- and
- ε = W/q = Blv
- to test each statement.
Final Logic:
- Work depends on B, v, l, and q.
- Therefore, statement (3) is incorrect.
"More B → More Work → More EMF"
8 The principle of EMF as Work per Charge implies:
1. implies that ε = q / W
2. states that emf is the work done per unit charge, yielding ε = Blv
3. is only valid for stationary charges
4. contradicts Faraday's law of induction
Choose the correct option:
�� EMF = Work/Charge. �� ε = W/q. �� Motional emf becomes Blv.
- By definition, ε = W/q → Using W = qvBl, ε = qvBl/q = Blv → This agrees with Faraday's law.
- �� Option A → Formula reversed.
- �� Option C → Valid for moving charges also.
- �� Option D → Completely consistent with Faraday's law.
Used
- �� Substitution
Application:
- �� Substitute W = qvBl into ε = W/q.
Final Logic:
- �� ε = Blv.
- "EMF = Work ÷ Charge."
9 When explaining the existence of induced emf in a stationary conductor, we must assume that
�� Stationary charges have v = 0. �� Magnetic force becomes zero. �� Induced electric field causes emf.
- Faraday's law states that a changing magnetic field creates a non-conservative electric field. → This electric field drives charges even when the conductor is stationary.
- �� Option B → Magnetic field cannot push stationary charges.
- �� Option C → Conductor remains stationary.
- �� Option D → Lorentz force requires motion.
Used
- �� Elimination
Application:
- �� Remove options requiring moving charges.
Final Logic:
- �� Changing magnetic field creates electric field.
- "Changing B creates E."
10 Choose the incorrect statement about induced electric fields:
�� Induced fields are non-conservative. �� Electrostatic fields are conservative. �� They are not identical.
- Induced electric fields arise from changing magnetic fields. → Unlike electrostatic fields, induced electric fields form closed loops and are non-conservative. → Therefore statement C is incorrect.
- �� Option A → Correct consequence of Faraday's law.
- �� Option B → Electric force qE acts on stationary charges.
- �� Option D → Explains induced current in stationary coils.
Used
- �� Odd One Out
Application:
- �� Identify the statement conflicting with the nature of induced electric fields.
Final Logic:
- �� Induced and electrostatic electric fields are fundamentally different.
- "Induced E loops; electrostatic E ends."
11 If a metallic rod is rotated in a uniform magnetic field, the free electrons get distributed over the ring due to the Lorentz force. Thus, if a steady state is reached at a certain value of emf, the net flow of electrons along the rod will be
�� Electrons redistribute initially. �� Internal electric field develops. �� Steady state implies no net electron flow.
- During rotation, free electrons experience Lorentz force and accumulate at one end. → This charge separation creates an electric field opposing further movement of charges. → At steady state, electric force balances magnetic force. → Therefore, no further net flow of electrons occurs along the rod.
- �� Option A → Electron flow does not continuously increase.
- �� Option B → EMF is steady, not alternating.
- �� Option D → Maximum flow occurs only during transient redistribution.
Used
- �� Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application:
- �� The phrase "steady state" implies equilibrium and no net charge transport.
Final Logic:
- �� Force balance at steady state results in zero net electron flow.
- "Steady state = No net drift."
12 In a rotating metallic rod, the accumulation of free electrons and the resulting potential behavior are:
�� Charges redistribute. �� Potential difference develops. �� Steady motional emf exists.
- Rotation in a magnetic field causes charge separation. → Electrons redistribute over the conductor until equilibrium is reached. → A steady potential difference exists between the ends of the rod. → Hence, a steady-state emf is produced.
- �� Option A → EMF is not alternating under uniform rotation.
- �� Option C → Charge concentration at center does not eliminate emf.
- �� Option D → Charges are not lost to surroundings.
Used
- �� Elimination
Application:
- �� Remove options contradicting steady rotational induction.
Final Logic:
- �� Charge redistribution leads to a stable emf.
- "Redistribution → Stable EMF."
13 Match List I with List II regarding the integration of segment EMF in a rotating rod.
| List I | List II |
|---|---|
| (1) Velocity of segment dr | (a) Bvdr |
| (2) Elemental emf dε | (b) rω |
| (3) Total emf limits | (c) ½BωR² |
| (4) Total emf expression | (d) 0 to R |
Velocity of an element at radius r is rω. Elemental emf is dε = Bvdr. Integration is performed from 0 to R. The resulting emf is ½BωR².
- (1) Velocity of segment dr For a rod rotating with angular velocity ω, the linear velocity of an element at distance r from the axis is: v = rω → 1 → b → (2) Elemental emf dε The small emf induced across an elemental length dr is: dε = Bvdr → 2 → a → (3) Total emf limits To find the total emf across the rod, integrate from the axis (r = 0) to the outer end (r = R). → 3 → d → (4) Total emf expression ε = ∫₀ᴿ Bωr dr = ½BωR² → 4 → c Therefore: 1 → b 2 → a 3 → d 4 → c Hence, Option A is correct.
- Option B: Interchanges velocity and elemental emf expressions.
- Option C: Incorrectly matches integration limits with elemental emf.
- Option D: Contains multiple incorrect correspondences.
Used
- Option Grouping
Application:
- Follow the standard derivation of emf induced in a rotating rod.
Final Logic:
- v = rω
- ��
- dε = Bvdr
- ��
- Integrate from 0 to R
- ��
- ε = ½BωR²
"rω → Bvdr → 0 to R → ½BωR²"
14 Choose the correct statements regarding angular speed relations in a rotating rod:
(1) The linear velocity v is related to angular speed ω by v = ωr.
(2) The angular speed ω equals 2πν, where ν is frequency.
(3) The linear velocity v is uniform across the entire rod length.
(4) Substituting v = ωr into the integration yields ε = 1/2 BωR².
�� v = ωr. �� ω = 2πν. �� Velocity varies with r.
- Statements A and B are standard rotational motion relations. → Using v = ωr in the emf integration gives: ε = ∫₀ᴿ Bωrdr = ½BωR² → Statement 3 is incorrect because different points on the rod have different values of r and hence different speeds.
- �� Option A → Includes false statement 3.
- �� Option C → Includes false statement 3.
- �� Option D → Includes false statement 3.
Used
- �� Elimination
Application:
- �� Identify the incorrect rotational motion statement.
Final Logic:
- �� Linear speed increases with radius.
- "Farther out, faster."
15 The rate of change of area method:
Choose correct:
�� Area swept changes with time. �� Flux changes due to area change. �� Same emf as integration method.
- The area method uses Faraday's law: ε = B(dA/dt) → A closed loop is considered to calculate changing magnetic flux. → It gives the same result as direct integration.
- �� Option B → 2 may remain constant.
- �� Option C → Both methods give identical results.
- �� Option D → θ changes continuously during rotation.
Used
- �� Elimination
Application:
- �� Identify the statement consistent with flux-change derivation.
Final Logic:
- �� Changing area, not changing B, produces emf.
- "Changing area = Changing flux."
16 If the radius R of the circle swept by the rod is 2.0 m, the uniform magnetic field B is 0.5 T, and the rod rotates such that the rate of change of angle dθ/dt is 10 rad/s, what is the induced emf using the area of sector equation?
�� ε = ½BR²ω. �� R = 2 m. �� ω = 10 rad/s.
- Using: ε = ½BR²ω = ½ × 0.5 × (2)² × 10 = 0.25 × 4 × 10 = 10 V
- �� Option A → Half the correct value.
- �� Option C → Double the correct value.
- �� Option D → Arithmetic error.
Used
- �� Substitution
Application:
- �� Substitute values into the standard formula.
Final Logic:
- �� ε = 10 V.
- "Half B R-square omega."
17 Choose the correct Statements Regarding the Axle and Rim Potential of a Rotating Wheel in a Magnetic Field
(1) An induced emf develops between the axle and the rim.
(2) The wheel acts like a rotating metallic rod with length equal to its radius.
(3) The induced emf is calculated using ε = ½ωBR².
(4) Adding more identical spokes in parallel increases the total output voltage.
A rotating wheel develops an emf between its axle and rim. Each spoke behaves like a rotating conducting rod. The induced emf is given by ε = ½ωBR². Adding more spokes does not increase the emf.
- Statement (1) is correct. When a conducting wheel rotates in a magnetic field, charge separation occurs, producing a potential difference between the axle and the rim. → Statement (2) is correct. Each spoke can be treated as a conducting rod rotating about one end, with effective length equal to the wheel radius R. → Statement (3) is correct. The emf induced between the axle and rim is: ε = ½ωBR² where: ω = angular velocity B = magnetic field strength R = wheel radius → Statement (4) is incorrect. Adding identical spokes in parallel does not increase the emf. The potential difference between axle and rim remains the same. Additional spokes only reduce internal resistance and increase current-carrying capability. Therefore, the correct statements are: (1), (2), and (3) Hence, Option A is correct.
- Option B: Includes statement (4), which is false.
- Option C: Includes statement (4), which is false.
- Option D: Includes statement (4), which is false.
Used
- Elimination
Application:
- Apply the rotating rod emf formula and parallel-source concept.
Final Logic:
- Rotating wheel → Axle-rim emf.
- Spoke behaves like a rotating rod.
- More spokes → More current capacity, not more voltage.
"Wheel = Many Rotating Rods"
18 In a wheel with multiple metallic spokes rotating in a magnetic field, the number of spokes is immaterial to the total induced emf because
�� Same axle and rim terminals. �� Parallel connection. �� Voltage remains unchanged.
- Every spoke develops the same emf. → Since all spokes connect between the same axle and rim, they are effectively connected in parallel. → Parallel sources of equal emf do not increase output voltage.
- �� Option A → Emfs reinforce rather than cancel.
- �� Option C → Spokes are not connected in series.
- �� Option D → Magnetic field interacts with each spoke.
Used
- �� Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application:
- �� Identify the physical arrangement of the spokes.
Final Logic:
- �� Same terminals imply parallel connection.
- "Same ends = Parallel."
19 Incorrect statement about the effects of the horizontal component of earth's magnetic field (HE):
�� Motion is necessary. �� Stationary conductor has no motional emf. �� Earth's field can induce emf only with motion.
- Motional emf requires motion through a magnetic field. → A stationary coil experiences no motional emf in a constant magnetic field. → Therefore statement C is incorrect.
- �� Option A → Correct application of motional induction.
- �� Option B → Reasonable approximation over wheel dimensions.
- �� Option D → HE can be used in emf calculations.
Used
- �� Elimination
Application:
- �� Remove the option violating the condition for motional emf.
Final Logic:
- �� No motion means no motional emf.
- "No motion, no motional emf."
20 If a horizontal straight wire extending east to west falls with a speed v at right angles to the horizontal component of the earth's magnetic field B, the motional emf induced depends on its length l, speed v, and B. Thus, if the wire's length is 10 m, falling at 5.0 m/s in a field of 0.30 × 10⁻⁴ T, the instantaneous emf will be
�� ε = Blv. �� B = 0.30 × 10⁻⁴ T. �� l = 10 m, v = 5 m/s.
- Using: ε = Blv = (0.30 × 10⁻⁴)(10)(5) = 15 × 10⁻⁴ = 1.5 × 10⁻³ V → Therefore the provided answer is correct.
- �� Option B → One power of ten smaller.
- �� Option C → Numerical error.
- �� Option D → Ten times larger than correct value.
Used
- �� Substitution
Application:
- �� Direct substitution into ε = Blv.
Final Logic:
- �� Multiplying B, l and v gives 1.5 × 10⁻³ V.
- "EMF = B × l × v."
