CUET UG Physics Booster Test 2- Experimental Study of Photoelectric Effect
📌 Answers are locked once submitted — results and explanations appear at the end.
QUESTION 1 OF 20
Statements regarding the glass/quartz tube setup:
1. Quartz is specifically chosen because it permits UV rays to irradiate the plate.
2. It allows the study of UV-sensitive metals like zinc and magnesium.
3. Alkali metals would not show photoelectric effect if visible light is used.
4. The window ensures light reaches the emitter without being fully absorbed by standard glass.
QUESTION 2 OF 20
Incorrect statement about the commutator's role in analyzing stopping potential:
QUESTION 3 OF 20
Match List I (Potential setup) with List II (Voltmeter indication and observation):
| List I | List II |
|---|---|
| 1. V = 0 | a. Saturation current is reached |
| 2. V > 0 (High) | b. Only sufficiently energetic electrons reach collector |
| 3. V = -V₀ | c. Photocurrent is exactly zero |
| 4. V < 0 but > -V₀ | d. Small photocurrent exists due to initial kinetic energy |
QUESTION 4 OF 20
When a microammeter tracks the photocurrent while the accelerating potential is increased from zero, the readings
QUESTION 5 OF 20
If the distance between a point light source and the emitter is doubled (r' = 2r), the new saturation current I_sat' relates to the original I_sat as:
QUESTION 6 OF 20
The linear relationship between photocurrent and intensity implies that
QUESTION 7 OF 20
A laser emits a power of 2.0 × 10⁻³ W with photon energy 3.98 × 10⁻¹⁹ J. What is the total number of photons emitted per second?
QUESTION 8 OF 20
If intensity of incident radiation is increased while keeping frequency constant, the number of energy quanta per unit area per unit time is ______ and the maximum kinetic energy of emitted electrons is ______.
QUESTION 9 OF 20
Correct statements regarding the effect of accelerating potential:
1. Increasing it helps sweep all emitted electrons to the collector.
2. It increases the kinetic energy of electrons upon emission from the surface.
3. Beyond a certain voltage, it cannot extract any more electrons than what the intensity dictates.
4. It alters the work function of the material.
QUESTION 10 OF 20
Applying a retarding potential targets the kinetic energy of electrons; the current drops to zero precisely when
QUESTION 11 OF 20
The maximum current value (saturation current) is fundamentally constrained by
QUESTION 12 OF 20
Incorrect statement about the total collection of electrons:
QUESTION 13 OF 20
Observations at the cut-off point:
1. The microammeter reads zero current.
2. Even the most energetic photoelectrons are repelled before reaching plate A.
3. The cut-off point shifts if the intensity of the light is doubled.
4. The cut-off point is heavily dependent on the frequency of incident radiation.
QUESTION 14 OF 20
The stopping potential V₀ is expressed in terms of frequency ν and work function φ₀ as:
QUESTION 15 OF 20
Match List I (Parameters in Einstein's equation) with List II (Physical interpretation):
| List I | List II |
|---|---|
| 1. hν | a. Minimum energy required to escape metal surface |
| 2. φ₀ | b. Energy of a single quantum of incident radiation |
| 3. Kmax | c. Maximum kinetic energy of emitted electron |
| 4. ν₀ | d. Threshold frequency for the material |
QUESTION 16 OF 20
According to Einstein's picture, intensity alters the ______ of emitted electrons, while the energy of individual photons solely dictates the ______ of the electrons.
QUESTION 17 OF 20
If the work function of caesium is 2.14 eV, what is its threshold frequency?
(h = 6.63 × 10⁻³⁴ J s, e = 1.6 × 10⁻¹⁹ C)
QUESTION 18 OF 20
Correct statements regarding the V₀ versus ν graph:
1. It is a straight line for a given photosensitive material.
2. The slope of the line is given by h/e.
3. The slope depends on the nature of the material.
4. The intercept on the frequency axis is the threshold frequency.
QUESTION 19 OF 20
The classical wave theory failed to explain the absence of time lag because it predicted that
QUESTION 20 OF 20
The fact that photoelectric emission occurs in about 10⁻⁹ seconds or less
Test Complete!
Answer Review
1 Statements regarding the glass/quartz tube setup:
1. Quartz is specifically chosen because it permits UV rays to irradiate the plate.
2. It allows the study of UV-sensitive metals like zinc and magnesium.
3. Alkali metals would not show photoelectric effect if visible light is used.
4. The window ensures light reaches the emitter without being fully absorbed by standard glass.
�� Quartz transmits ultraviolet radiation. �� Zinc and magnesium require UV radiation. �� Ordinary glass absorbs UV radiation.
- Quartz is used because ultraviolet radiation can pass through it, whereas ordinary glass absorbs most UV radiation. This enables experiments on metals such as zinc and magnesium whose threshold frequencies lie in the ultraviolet region. → Statement 1 is correct. → Statement 2 is correct. → Statement 4 is correct because quartz prevents UV absorption that would occur in ordinary glass. → Statement 3 is incorrect because alkali metals can exhibit photoelectric effect with visible light due to their low work functions.
- �� Statement 3 → Alkali metals such as cesium and potassium can emit photoelectrons under visible light.
Used
- �� Elimination
Application:
- �� Reject the statement that contradicts the known behavior of alkali metals.
Final Logic:
- �� Only statements 1, 2 and 4 are correct.
- Quartz = UV Pass
2 Incorrect statement about the commutator's role in analyzing stopping potential:
�� Commutator reverses polarity. �� Retarding field helps determine stopping potential. �� Work function is a material property.
- The commutator changes the polarity between the emitter and collector plates. This enables the application of a retarding potential required to determine the stopping potential and maximum kinetic energy of photoelectrons. → The work function depends only on the nature of the material and is not altered by polarity reversal. → Therefore, option D is correct.
- �� Option A → Correct function of the commutator.
- �� Option B → Correct because retarding potential prevents many electrons from reaching the collector.
- �� Option C → Correct because stopping potential measurement gives maximum kinetic energy.
Used
- �� Odd One Out
Application:
- �� Identify the statement unrelated to voltage reversal effects.
Final Logic:
- �� Work function remains unchanged by circuit polarity.
- Work Function = Material Property
3 Match List I (Potential setup) with List II (Voltmeter indication and observation):
| List I | List II |
|---|---|
| 1. V = 0 | a. Saturation current is reached |
| 2. V > 0 (High) | b. Only sufficiently energetic electrons reach collector |
| 3. V = -V₀ | c. Photocurrent is exactly zero |
| 4. V < 0 but > -V₀ | d. Small photocurrent exists due to initial kinetic energy |
�� Some electrons reach collector even at zero voltage. �� Large positive voltage gives saturation current. �� Stopping potential gives zero current.
- Therefore Option A is correct.
- �� Option B → Incorrect matching for saturation and stopping potential conditions.
- �� Option C → Incorrect assignment of zero current and saturation current.
- �� Option D → High positive voltage corresponds to saturation current, not selective collection.
Used
- �� Option Grouping
Application:
- �� Match each voltage condition with the corresponding photocurrent behavior.
Final Logic:
- �� Only Option A correctly matches all four conditions.
- +V → Saturation, −V₀ → Stop
4 When a microammeter tracks the photocurrent while the accelerating potential is increased from zero, the readings
�� Accelerating voltage improves collection. �� Current rises initially. �� Saturation current is eventually reached.
- As accelerating potential increases, more emitted photoelectrons are collected by the collector plate. The photocurrent therefore increases. Once all emitted photoelectrons are collected, saturation current is reached and the current remains constant even if voltage is increased further. → Hence option C is correct.
- �� Option A → Opposite trend is observed.
- �� Option B → Current cannot exceed saturation current.
- �� Option D → Average photocurrent follows a predictable pattern.
Used
- �� Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application:
- �� Relate accelerating voltage with saturation current behavior.
Final Logic:
- �� Current rises and then saturates.
- Rise → Saturate
5 If the distance between a point light source and the emitter is doubled (r' = 2r), the new saturation current I_sat' relates to the original I_sat as:
�� Intensity follows inverse square law. �� Saturation current is proportional to intensity. �� Doubling distance reduces intensity fourfold.
- For a point source: Intensity ∝ 1/r² When distance doubles: I' = I/(2²) = I/4 Since saturation current is directly proportional to intensity: Isat' = Isat/4 = 0.25 Isat → Therefore, option C is correct.
- �� Option A → Intensity changes with distance.
- �� Option B → Current decreases rather than increases.
- �� Option D → Reduction is by a factor of four, not two.
Used
- �� Substitution
Application:
- �� Apply inverse square law directly.
Final Logic:
- �� Doubling distance reduces saturation current to one-fourth.
- Double Distance → Quarter Intensity
6 The linear relationship between photocurrent and intensity implies that
�� Photocurrent is proportional to photon number. �� One photon interacts with one electron. �� Supports Einstein's photon theory.
- The linear dependence of photocurrent on intensity shows that increasing intensity increases the number of incident photons. Since each photon transfers its energy to a single electron, the number of emitted electrons increases proportionally. → This supports the concept that photoelectric emission is a one-photon-one-electron process. → Therefore, option B is correct.
- �� Option A → One photon does not normally eject multiple electrons in the photoelectric effect.
- �� Option C → Continuous energy accumulation is a prediction of classical wave theory and cannot explain photoelectric observations.
- �� Option D → Threshold frequency is a property of the material and is independent of intensity.
Used
- �� Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application:
- �� Relate linear photocurrent behavior to Einstein's photon model.
Final Logic:
- �� Linear photocurrent confirms one photon transfers energy to one electron.
- One Photon → One Electron
7 A laser emits a power of 2.0 × 10⁻³ W with photon energy 3.98 × 10⁻¹⁹ J. What is the total number of photons emitted per second?
�� Power = Energy per second. �� Number of photons = Total energy per second ÷ Energy per photon. �� Apply direct substitution.
- Number of photons emitted per second: N = P/E = (2.0 × 10⁻³)/(3.98 × 10⁻¹⁹) ≈ 5.03 × 10¹⁵ photons/s ≈ 5.0 × 10¹⁵ photons/s → Therefore, option A is correct.
- �� Option B → Overestimates the photon count.
- �� Option C → Incorrect dimensional interpretation.
- �� Option D → Much smaller than the calculated value.
Used
- �� Substitution
Application:
- �� Substitute values into N = P/E.
Final Logic:
- �� N = (2.0 × 10⁻³)/(3.98 × 10⁻¹⁹) ≈ 5.0 × 10¹⁵ photons/s.
- Photons = Power ÷ Photon Energy
8 If intensity of incident radiation is increased while keeping frequency constant, the number of energy quanta per unit area per unit time is ______ and the maximum kinetic energy of emitted electrons is ______.
�� Intensity determines photon flux. �� Frequency determines photon energy. �� Maximum kinetic energy depends on frequency.
- Increasing intensity while keeping frequency constant increases the number of photons incident per unit area per unit time. → However, each photon still possesses the same energy because frequency remains unchanged. → According to Einstein's equation: Kmax = hν − ϕ Since ν is constant, Kmax remains constant. → Therefore option B is correct.
- �� Option A → Photon number does not remain constant when intensity increases.
- �� Option C → Maximum kinetic energy does not increase without increasing frequency.
- �� Option D → Photon flux definitely increases with intensity.
Used
- �� Elimination
Application:
- �� Separate intensity-dependent quantities from frequency-dependent quantities.
Final Logic:
- �� Intensity changes photon number, not photon energy.
- Intensity → Number, Frequency → Energy
9 Correct statements regarding the effect of accelerating potential:
1. Increasing it helps sweep all emitted electrons to the collector.
2. It increases the kinetic energy of electrons upon emission from the surface.
3. Beyond a certain voltage, it cannot extract any more electrons than what the intensity dictates.
4. It alters the work function of the material.
�� Accelerating potential improves collection efficiency. �� Saturation current eventually occurs. �� Work function remains unchanged.
- Increasing accelerating potential helps collect a larger fraction of emitted electrons. → Statement 1 is correct because more photoelectrons are swept toward the collector. → Statement 3 is correct because once saturation current is reached, increasing voltage further cannot collect more electrons than are being emitted. → Statement 2 is incorrect because electron kinetic energy at emission is determined by photon energy, not by the accelerating voltage. → Statement 4 is incorrect because work function is an intrinsic property of the material.
- �� Statement 2 → Initial kinetic energy depends on frequency of incident radiation.
- �� Statement 4 → Work function is unaffected by accelerating potential.
Used
- �� Elimination
Application:
- �� Remove statements that contradict Einstein's photoelectric equation.
Final Logic:
- �� Only statements 1 and 3 correctly describe accelerating potential effects.
- Accelerate Collects, Not Creates
10 Applying a retarding potential targets the kinetic energy of electrons; the current drops to zero precisely when
�� Retarding field opposes electron motion. �� Stopping potential stops even the fastest electrons. �� Kmax = eV₀.
- Photocurrent becomes zero when the retarding potential is large enough to stop even the most energetic photoelectrons. → At stopping potential: eV₀ = Kmax → Thus the retarding potential energy equals the maximum kinetic energy of emitted photoelectrons. → Therefore option B is correct.
- �� Option A → Work function determines emission, not stopping condition.
- �� Option C → Current can become zero even with frequency above threshold if sufficient retarding potential is applied.
- �� Option D → Collector charge saturation is not the reason for stopping current.
Used
- �� Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application:
- �� Relate stopping potential directly to maximum kinetic energy.
Final Logic:
- �� Current becomes zero when eV₀ equals Kmax.
- Stop Current → eV = Kmax
11 The maximum current value (saturation current) is fundamentally constrained by
�� Saturation current depends on emitted electrons. �� Emitted electrons depend on photon flux. �� Photon flux is determined by intensity.
- Saturation current is reached when all emitted photoelectrons are collected. Therefore, its value depends on the total number of photoelectrons emitted per second. → The number of emitted photoelectrons is directly proportional to the number of incident photons per second, which is determined by the intensity of the radiation. → Hence, option A is correct.
- �� Option B → Retarding potential affects stopping potential measurements, not the saturation current value.
- �� Option C → Frequency affects kinetic energy, not the number of emitted electrons once ν > ν₀.
- �� Option D → Speed of light has no direct role in determining saturation current.
Used
- �� Elimination
Application:
- �� Identify the factor controlling the number of emitted photoelectrons.
Final Logic:
- �� More incident photons produce more emitted electrons and larger saturation current.
- Intensity ↑ → Saturation Current ↑
12 Incorrect statement about the total collection of electrons:
�� Saturation requires photoemission. �� Frequency must exceed threshold frequency. �� Plateau region corresponds to a complete collection.
- Total collection of electrons corresponds to saturation current. In this region all emitted photoelectrons are collected by the collector plate. → Statements A, B and C correctly describe the saturation region. → Statement D is incorrect because photoelectric emission itself does not occur when the frequency is below the threshold frequency. Therefore saturation current cannot exist below threshold frequency.
- �� Option A → Correct description of the saturation region.
- �� Option B → Correct because all available electrons are already collected.
- �� Option C → Correct since collection rate equals emission rate at saturation.
Used
- �� Elimination
Application:
- �� Reject the statement that contradicts the threshold frequency condition.
Final Logic:
- �� Saturation current requires ν > ν₀, not ν < ν₀.
- Below ν₀ → No Emission
13 Observations at the cut-off point:
1. The microammeter reads zero current.
2. Even the most energetic photoelectrons are repelled before reaching plate A.
3. The cut-off point shifts if the intensity of the light is doubled.
4. The cut-off point is heavily dependent on the frequency of incident radiation.
�� Stopping potential gives zero current. �� Fastest electrons are stopped. �� Frequency affects stopping potential.
- At the stopping potential, photocurrent becomes exactly zero because even the most energetic photoelectrons fail to reach the collector. → Statement 1 is correct. → Statement 2 is correct. → Statement 4 is correct because stopping potential depends on frequency through Einstein's equation. → Statement 3 is incorrect because stopping potential is independent of intensity.
- �� Statement 3 → Doubling intensity changes photocurrent, not stopping potential.
Used
- �� Elimination
Application:
- �� Separate frequency-dependent effects from intensity-dependent effects.
Final Logic:
- �� Only statements 1, 2 and 4 are correct.
- Stop Voltage → Zero Current
14 The stopping potential V₀ is expressed in terms of frequency ν and work function φ₀ as:
�� Einstein's equation: Kmax = hν − φ₀. �� Kmax = eV₀. �� Combine both relations.
- Einstein's photoelectric equation is: Kmax = hν − φ₀ Also, Kmax = eV₀ Therefore, eV₀ = hν − φ₀ or V₀ = (hν/e) − (φ₀/e) → Hence option B is correct.
- �� Option A → Incorrect sign.
- �� Option C → Dimensionally incorrect.
- �� Option D → Not derived from Einstein's equation.
Used
- �� Substitution
Application:
- �� Combine the two standard photoelectric equations.
Final Logic:
- �� V₀ = (hν/e) − (φ₀/e).
- eV = hν − φ
15 Match List I (Parameters in Einstein's equation) with List II (Physical interpretation):
| List I | List II |
|---|---|
| 1. hν | a. Minimum energy required to escape metal surface |
| 2. φ₀ | b. Energy of a single quantum of incident radiation |
| 3. Kmax | c. Maximum kinetic energy of emitted electron |
| 4. ν₀ | d. Threshold frequency for the material |
�� hν represents photon energy. �� φ₀ is the work function. �� ν₀ is threshold frequency.
- Therefore, Option A is correct.
- �� Option B → Work function and photon energy are interchanged.
- �� Option C → Multiple physical meanings are mismatched.
- �� Option D → Incorrect interpretation of all major parameters.
Used
- �� Option Grouping
Application:
- �� Match each symbol with its standard NCERT definition.
Final Logic:
- �� Only Option A correctly pairs all quantities.
- hν = Photon, φ = Work Function
16 According to Einstein's picture, intensity alters the ______ of emitted electrons, while the energy of individual photons solely dictates the ______ of the electrons.
�� Intensity changes electron count. �� Frequency changes electron energy. �� Supports photon theory.
- Increasing intensity increases the number of incident photons and therefore the number of emitted electrons. → The maximum kinetic energy is determined by the energy of individual photons according to: Kmax = hν − φ₀ → Hence intensity affects number, while photon energy determines maximum kinetic energy. → Therefore option B is correct.
- �� Option A → Work function is a material property.
- �� Option C → Mass and threshold frequency are not altered this way.
- �� Option D → Retarding potential polarity is externally applied.
Used
- �� Elimination
Application:
- �� Separate intensity effects from frequency effects.
Final Logic:
- �� Intensity controls quantity; frequency controls energy.
- Intensity → Number, Frequency → Energy
17 If the work function of caesium is 2.14 eV, what is its threshold frequency?
(h = 6.63 × 10⁻³⁴ J s, e = 1.6 × 10⁻¹⁹ C)
�� Threshold frequency: ν₀ = φ₀/h. �� Convert eV into joules. �� Substitute values.
- Work function: φ₀ = 2.14 × 1.6 × 10⁻¹⁹ = 3.424 × 10⁻¹⁹ J Threshold frequency: ν₀ = φ₀/h = (3.424 × 10⁻¹⁹)/(6.63 × 10⁻³⁴) ≈ 5.16 × 10¹⁴ Hz → Therefore option A is correct.
- �� Option B → Calculation error.
- �� Option C → Wrong power of ten.
- �� Option D → Incorrect numerical value.
Used
- �� Substitution
Application:
- �� Use ν₀ = φ₀/h directly.
Final Logic:
- �� ν₀ ≈ 5.16 × 10¹⁴ Hz.
- Threshold: ν₀ = φ/h
18 Correct statements regarding the V₀ versus ν graph:
1. It is a straight line for a given photosensitive material.
2. The slope of the line is given by h/e.
3. The slope depends on the nature of the material.
4. The intercept on the frequency axis is the threshold frequency.
�� V₀–ν graph is linear. �� Slope equals h/e. �� Frequency-axis intercept gives ν₀.
- From: V₀ = (h/e)ν − (φ₀/e) → Statement 1 is correct because the graph is a straight line. → Statement 2 is correct because slope = h/e. → Statement 4 is correct because V₀ = 0 gives ν = ν₀. → Statement 3 is incorrect because slope depends only on h and e, not on the material.
- �� Statement 3 → Slope is universal and independent of the material.
Used
- �� Elimination
Application:
- �� Use the equation of a straight line and identify slope and intercept.
Final Logic:
- �� Statements 1, 2 and 4 are correct.
- Slope = h/e
19 The classical wave theory failed to explain the absence of time lag because it predicted that
�� Wave theory assumed continuous energy transfer. �� Energy accumulation should take time. �� Experiments showed instantaneous emission.
- Classical wave theory proposed that light energy is spread continuously across the wavefront. According to this idea, an electron would need a long time to accumulate enough energy for escape, especially at low intensities. → Experiments showed photoemission occurs almost instantaneously, contradicting this prediction. → Therefore, option B is correct.
- �� Option A → This is Einstein's photon explanation.
- �� Option C → Threshold frequency is not a wave-theory prediction.
- �� Option D → Unrelated to the time lag problem.
Used
- �� Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application:
- �� Compare wave-theory prediction with experimental observations.
Final Logic:
- �� Continuous energy accumulation predicts delay, but none is observed.
- Wave Theory → Wait Time
20 The fact that photoelectric emission occurs in about 10⁻⁹ seconds or less
�� Emission occurs almost instantly. �� Photon transfers energy in one interaction. �� Supports Einstein's photon theory.
- The extremely small time lag observed in photoelectric emission indicates that an electron receives sufficient energy in a single interaction with a photon and escapes immediately. → This observation strongly supports Einstein's concept of light quanta (photons). → Therefore option B is correct.
- �� Option A → Work functions are finite and material-dependent.
- �� Option C → Continuous energy distribution cannot explain instantaneous emission.
- �� Option D → Saturation current remains proportional to intensity.
Used
- �� Elimination
Application:
- �� Identify the statement consistent with the observed instantaneous emission.
Final Logic:
- �� Instantaneous emission supports one-photon-one-electron interaction.
- Instant Photon → Instant Electron
