CUET UG Physics Booster Test - 2 Equipotentials and Energy
📌 Answers are locked once submitted — results and explanations appear at the end.
QUESTION 1 OF 20
Incorrect statement about defining equipotential surfaces:
QUESTION 2 OF 20
To move a test charge q between any two points on an equipotential surface, the total required work W is strictly:
QUESTION 3 OF 20
Match the following:
| List I | List II |
|---|---|
| 1. Single positive point charge | a. Radial inward field lines, equipotentials are concentric spheres |
| 2. Single negative point charge | b. Radial outward field lines, equipotentials are concentric spheres |
| 3. Positive charge field direction | c. Away from the charge |
| 4. Negative charge field direction | d. Toward the charge B.1-b, 2-a, 3-c, 4-d |
QUESTION 4 OF 20
Parallel planes for uniform electric fields:
1. Are planes normal to the uniform field direction.
2. Are planes parallel to the uniform field direction.
3. Have constant potential on each individual plane.
4. Intersect each other.
QUESTION 5 OF 20
Normal orientation setup statements:
1. The component of the electric field along the equipotential surface must be zero.
2. This normal orientation follows directly from the zero potential difference property.
3. This principle applies only to isolated point charges, not dipoles.
4. If the field was not normal, it would have some non-zero component along the surface.
QUESTION 6 OF 20
Consequence of the non-existence of tangential field components:
QUESTION 7 OF 20
Correct statements about the surface map for electric dipoles:
1. The equatorial plane acts as a zero-potential surface.
2. The map is perfectly symmetrical along the equatorial plane.
3. The equipotential surfaces are perfectly concentric spheres everywhere.
QUESTION 8 OF 20
For two identical positive charges, the equipotential surfaces very close to each individual charge are:
QUESTION 9 OF 20
The mathematical relation between field and potential concludes that the electric field points:
QUESTION 10 OF 20
If the potential decreases by 20 V over a normal displacement of 2 mm, the magnitude of the uniform electric field is:
QUESTION 11 OF 20
The equation
mathematically proves that:
QUESTION 12 OF 20
Normal displacement for potential magnitude statements:
1. calculates the field component.
2. is inherently negative in the direction of the electric field.
3. The field opposes normal displacement completely.
QUESTION 13 OF 20
When building a two-charge system, why is the external work done in bringing the first charge from infinity to its location exactly zero?
QUESTION 14 OF 20
Incorrect statement about two-charge potential energy:
QUESTION 15 OF 20
Cumulative work for assembling three charges q₁, q₂, q₃:
1. Bringing q₃ requires work against the combined fields of q₁ and q₂.
2. The initial work to place q₁ is strictly non-zero.
3. The total cumulative work is completely independent of the assembly order.
4. The final energy relies solely on external driving forces.
QUESTION 16 OF 20
In the potential energy formula for three charges, the final expression is independent of the manner in which the configuration is assembled because of:
QUESTION 17 OF 20
In determining the potential energy of a charge in an external field, what is critically assumed about the test charge q?
QUESTION 18 OF 20
If an electron is placed at a position where the external potential is 10 V, its potential energy is:
QUESTION 19 OF 20
Correct statements about the Electron Volt:
1. It is fundamentally a unit of power, not energy.
2. It is defined as the energy gained by an electron accelerated by a 1 volt potential difference.
3. 1 eV = 1.6 × 10⁻¹⁹ J.
QUESTION 20 OF 20
Conversion of 1 GeV to Joules:
Test Complete!
Answer Review
1 Incorrect statement about defining equipotential surfaces:
�� Equipotential surfaces have constant potential. �� Potential difference along the surface is zero. �� Therefore, no work is required.
An equipotential surface is a surface on which the electric potential remains constant at every point. Since potential difference between any two points on such a surface is zero, the work done in moving a charge along the surface is also zero. Since , Therefore, statement C is incorrect. Statement A is correct because the shape of equipotential surfaces depends on the charge distribution producing the field. Statement B is correct for a point charge because all points at the same radial distance have the same potential. Statement D is also correct because an equipotential surface has no potential difference between any two of its points.
- �� Option A → Correct property of equipotential maps.
- �� Option B → Correct for a point charge.
- �� Option D → Correct definition of an equipotential surface.
Used – Concept Application
- Application
- Apply the definition of equipotential surfaces and the work-potential relation.
- Final Logic
- No potential difference means no work done.
Equipotential → Equal Potential → Zero Work
2 To move a test charge q between any two points on an equipotential surface, the total required work W is strictly:
�� Equipotential means constant potential. �� Potential difference is zero. �� Therefore work done is zero.
The work done in moving a charge between two points is On an equipotential surface, all points have the same electric potential. Therefore, Substituting into the work formula, This means that moving a charge anywhere along an equipotential surface requires no work. This property is one of the defining characteristics of equipotential surfaces and is widely used in electrostatic analysis.
- �� Option A → Potential difference, not potential itself, determines work.
- �� Option B → Incorrect expression for work.
- �� Option C → No infinite work is involved.
Used – Substitution
- Application
- Substitute ΔV = 0 into the work formula.
- Final Logic
- Zero potential difference gives zero work.
Same Potential → Same Energy → No Work
3 Match the following:
| List I | List II |
|---|---|
| 1. Single positive point charge | a. Radial inward field lines, equipotentials are concentric spheres |
| 2. Single negative point charge | b. Radial outward field lines, equipotentials are concentric spheres |
| 3. Positive charge field direction | c. Away from the charge |
| 4. Negative charge field direction | d. Toward the charge B.1-b, 2-a, 3-c, 4-d |
�� Equipotential surfaces are spherical for point charges. �� Positive charges produce outward fields. �� Negative charges produce inward fields.
For an isolated point charge, the electric potential depends only on radial distance from the charge. Therefore, equipotential surfaces are concentric spheres centered on the charge. For a positive charge, electric field lines emerge outward from the charge. For a negative charge, electric field lines terminate inward toward the charge. Thus the correct matching associates positive charges with outward radial fields and negative charges with inward radial fields while maintaining spherical equipotential surfaces.
- �� Option A → Positive and negative charge properties are interchanged.
- �� Option C → Incorrect assignment of field directions.
- �� Option D → Multiple mismatches between charge type and field orientation.
Used – NCERT Recall
- Application
- Recall the field-line pattern of isolated point charges.
- Final Logic
- Positive charges push outward; negative charges pull inward.
Negative → Pulls In
4 Parallel planes for uniform electric fields:
1. Are planes normal to the uniform field direction.
2. Are planes parallel to the uniform field direction.
3. Have constant potential on each individual plane.
4. Intersect each other.
�� Equipotential surfaces are perpendicular to field lines. �� Uniform fields produce parallel equipotential planes. �� Each plane has constant potential.
In a uniform electric field, the electric field lines are parallel and equally spaced. Equipotential surfaces must always be perpendicular to the electric field. Therefore, equipotential surfaces are planes normal to the field direction. Every point on a given plane possesses the same electric potential, making it an equipotential surface. Different equipotential planes never intersect because a point cannot simultaneously have two different potentials. Hence statements 1 and 3 are correct, while statements 2 and 4 are incorrect.
- �� Option B → Statement 2 is incorrect.
- �� Option C → Statement 4 is incorrect.
- �� Option D → Statement 4 is incorrect.
Used – Concept Application
- Application
- Use the relationship between electric field lines and equipotential surfaces.
- Final Logic
- Equipotential planes are perpendicular to the field and do not intersect.
Field ⟂ Equipotential
5 Normal orientation setup statements:
1. The component of the electric field along the equipotential surface must be zero.
2. This normal orientation follows directly from the zero potential difference property.
3. This principle applies only to isolated point charges, not dipoles.
4. If the field was not normal, it would have some non-zero component along the surface.
�� Electric field is normal to equipotential surfaces. �� Tangential field components must vanish. �� The rule applies to all electrostatic fields.
Equipotential surfaces have the same potential at every point. Therefore, moving a charge along the surface involves no change in potential and no work is done. If an electric field had a component along the surface, work would be done on a moving charge, producing a potential difference. This contradicts the definition of an equipotential surface. Hence the tangential component of the electric field must be zero, making the field normal to the surface. This principle is universal and applies to point charges, dipoles and all electrostatic configurations. Therefore statements 1, 2 and 4 are correct, while statement 3 is incorrect.
- �� Option A → Statement 3 is incorrect.
- �� Option B → Statement 1 is also correct.
- �� Option C → Statement 3 is incorrect.
Used – Logical Analysis
- Application
- Examine what would happen if the field had a tangential component.
- Final Logic
- A tangential field would create a potential difference, which is impossible on an equipotential surface.
Equipotential Surface → No Tangential Field
6 Consequence of the non-existence of tangential field components:
�� Tangential electric field is zero. �� Potential remains constant on the surface. �� No work is done along the surface.
An equipotential surface is characterized by a constant electric potential at every point. Since the electric field has no tangential component along the surface, a charge moving on the surface experiences no force in the direction of motion. Consequently, the work done in moving a charge along the equipotential surface is zero. This follows directly from Since for any two points on the surface, The absence of tangential electric field components is therefore responsible for the zero-work property of equipotential surfaces.
- �� Option B → Potential difference is zero, not infinite.
- �� Option C → Electric field lines never cross each other.
- �� Option D → No tangential force exists to cause continuous acceleration.
Used – Concept Application
- Application
- Relate the absence of tangential electric field to the work-potential relationship.
- Final Logic
- No tangential field means no work along the surface.
No Tangential Field → No Work
7 Correct statements about the surface map for electric dipoles:
1. The equatorial plane acts as a zero-potential surface.
2. The map is perfectly symmetrical along the equatorial plane.
3. The equipotential surfaces are perfectly concentric spheres everywhere.
�� Dipole potential is zero on the equatorial plane. �� Equipotential patterns show symmetry. �� Dipole surfaces are not spherical.
An electric dipole consists of equal and opposite charges separated by a small distance. Due to symmetry, the equatorial plane is a zero-potential surface because the positive and negative charge contributions cancel exactly. The equipotential map is symmetric about the equatorial plane. However, unlike the case of a single point charge, the equipotential surfaces are not concentric spheres. Their shapes are distorted due to the presence of two opposite charges. Therefore statements 1 and 2 are correct, while statement 3 is incorrect.
- �� Option A → Statement 3 is incorrect.
- �� Option C → Statement 3 is incorrect.
- �� Option D → Statements 1 and 2 are also correct.
Used – NCERT Recall
- Application
- Recall the standard equipotential map of an electric dipole.
- Final Logic
- Dipole equipotential surfaces are symmetric but not spherical.
Dipole Equator → Potential Zero
8 For two identical positive charges, the equipotential surfaces very close to each individual charge are:
�� Nearby regions are dominated by one charge. �� Potential resembles that of a point charge. �� Equipotential surfaces become nearly spherical.
When observing points very close to one of two identical positive charges, the contribution of the nearby charge is much greater than that of the distant charge. Therefore, the electric potential in that region behaves almost like the potential due to a single isolated point charge. Since equipotential surfaces around a point charge are concentric spheres, the surfaces near each charge are approximately spherical. At larger distances, the influence of both charges becomes significant and the equipotential surfaces become more complex.
- �� Option B → Equipotential surfaces are not flat near a point charge.
- �� Option C → Straight lines cannot represent three-dimensional equipotential surfaces.
- �� Option D → Cylindrical surfaces do not describe the local geometry around a point charge.
Used – Concept Application
- Application
- Identify which charge dominates the potential in the nearby region.
- Final Logic
- Near one charge, the field resembles that of a single point charge.
Near Charge → Near Sphere
9 The mathematical relation between field and potential concludes that the electric field points:
�� Electric field equals negative potential gradient. �� Field points toward lower potential. �� Maximum decrease determines direction.
The relation between electric field and electric potential is The negative sign indicates that the electric field points toward decreasing potential. More specifically, it points in the direction where the potential decreases most rapidly. This relationship explains why electric field lines are perpendicular to equipotential surfaces. The field always seeks the steepest fall in potential and therefore determines the direction of motion of a positive test charge.
- �� Option A → Electric field is normal to equipotential surfaces.
- �� Option C → Field points toward decreasing potential.
- �� Option D → Electric field is directly related to the potential gradient.
Used – NCERT Recall
- Application
- Recall the gradient relationship between field and potential.
- Final Logic
- The negative sign in determines the direction.
Field Follows Fall
10 If the potential decreases by 20 V over a normal displacement of 2 mm, the magnitude of the uniform electric field is:
�� Use . �� Convert mm into metres. �� Calculate the potential gradient.
The magnitude of the electric field is given by Given: Substituting, Therefore, the magnitude of the electric field is This result follows directly from the definition of electric field as the rate of decrease of potential with distance.
- �� Option B → Unit conversion error.
- �� Option C → Incorrect division.
- �� Option D → Wrong numerical magnitude.
Used – Substitution
- Application
- Apply the formula after converting units.
- Final Logic
- Divide the potential change by the normal displacement.
Field = Voltage Drop ÷ Distance
11 The equation
mathematically proves that:
�� Electric field is related to potential gradient. �� Potential changes most rapidly along the normal direction. �� Field magnitude equals rate of potential decrease.
The relation connects electric field magnitude with the rate of change of electric potential. Here, represents displacement in the direction of the electric field, which is normal to an equipotential surface. The negative sign indicates that electric potential decreases in the direction of the electric field. Therefore, the electric field magnitude is numerically equal to the decrease in potential per unit normal displacement. This equation forms the mathematical link between electric field and electric potential and is extensively used in electrostatics.
- �� Option A → Electric field is perpendicular, not parallel, to equipotential surfaces.
- �� Option B → Electric potential is a scalar quantity.
- �� Option D → Electric field is a vector quantity.
Used – Concept Application
- Application
- Interpret each term in the equation relating field and potential.
- Final Logic
- Electric field magnitude equals potential drop per unit normal distance.
Field = Potential Drop ÷ Distance
12 Normal displacement for potential magnitude statements:
1. calculates the field component.
2. is inherently negative in the direction of the electric field.
3. The field opposes normal displacement completely.
�� Potential decreases along the field direction. �� Electric field equals negative potential gradient. �� Correct mathematical relation is important.
The electric field magnitude is related to potential through This equation states that electric field is the negative rate of change of potential with distance. Since potential decreases in the direction of the electric field, is negative when displacement is taken along the field direction. Therefore statements 1 and 2 are correct. Statement 3 is incorrect because it reverses the correct relation. Statement 4 is also incorrect because the electric field does not necessarily oppose normal displacement; its effect depends on the direction of motion and the sign of the charge.
- �� Option B → Statement 3 is incorrect.
- �� Option C → Statements 3 and 4 are incorrect.
- �� Option D → Statement 4 is incorrect.
Used – NCERT Recall
- Application
- Recall the standard field-potential relationship.
- Final Logic
- Potential decreases in the direction of the electric field.
Minus Sign → Potential Falls
13 When building a two-charge system, why is the external work done in bringing the first charge from infinity to its location exactly zero?
�� The first charge is placed in empty space. �� No electric field exists initially. �� Therefore no work is required.
When assembling a system of charges, the first charge is brought from infinity before any other charges are present. Since no electric field exists at that stage, there is no electrostatic force opposing or assisting the motion of the charge. Consequently, the external agent does not need to perform any work to place the first charge at its designated location. The work done becomes important only when subsequent charges are brought into the electric field produced by previously placed charges.
- �� Option A → Potential at infinity is taken as zero, not infinite.
- �� Option C → The charge magnitude is irrelevant to this argument.
- �� Option D → Electrostatic force is conservative throughout.
Used – Logical Analysis
- Application
- Consider the state of the system before any charge is placed.
- Final Logic
- No field means no force and therefore no work.
First Charge → No Opposition
14 Incorrect statement about two-charge potential energy:
�� Electrostatic force is conservative. �� Potential energy depends only on initial and final states. �� Path independence is a key property.
The electrostatic potential energy of two charges separated by distance r is This expression depends only on the charges and their separation. Since electrostatic force is conservative, the work done in assembling the system is independent of the path followed. Therefore statement C is incorrect. Statements A and B correctly describe the sign of potential energy for like and unlike charges respectively. Statement D is also correct because the work done by the external agent is stored as electrostatic potential energy.
- �� Option A → Correct sign convention for like charges.
- �� Option B → Correct sign convention for unlike charges.
- �� Option D → Correct interpretation of stored energy.
Used – Concept Application
- Application
- Use the conservative nature of electrostatic forces.
- Final Logic
- Potential energy depends only on configuration, not on path.
Conservative Force → Path Independent
15 Cumulative work for assembling three charges q₁, q₂, q₃:
1. Bringing q₃ requires work against the combined fields of q₁ and q₂.
2. The initial work to place q₁ is strictly non-zero.
3. The total cumulative work is completely independent of the assembly order.
4. The final energy relies solely on external driving forces.
�� Third charge experiences the fields of existing charges. �� First charge requires zero work. �� Final energy is path independent.
While assembling a three-charge system, the first charge is placed without doing any work because no electric field exists initially. Therefore statement 2 is incorrect. When bringing the third charge q₃, it experiences the combined electric fields produced by q₁ and q₂, making statement 1 correct. Since electrostatic forces are conservative, the total work required to assemble the system depends only on the final configuration and not on the order of assembly. Hence statement 3 is also correct. Statement 4 is incorrect because the final electrostatic energy is determined by charge interactions rather than external driving forces alone.
- �� Option B → Statement 2 is incorrect.
- �� Option C → Statements 2 and 4 are incorrect.
- �� Option D → Statement 4 is incorrect.
Used – Concept Application
- Application
- Analyze the assembly process step by step.
- Final Logic
- Only previously placed charges contribute to the work required for later charges.
First Free, Third Feels Two
16 In the potential energy formula for three charges, the final expression is independent of the manner in which the configuration is assembled because of:
�� Electrostatic force is conservative. �� Work depends only on initial and final states. �� Assembly order does not affect total energy.
The electrostatic force is a conservative force. Therefore, the work done in moving charges depends only on their initial and final positions and not on the path followed. While assembling a system of three charges, different assembly sequences may involve different intermediate steps, but the total work done remains the same. Consequently, the electrostatic potential energy of the final configuration is independent of the manner in which the charges are assembled. This property allows a unique expression for the potential energy of the system and follows directly from the conservative nature of electrostatic interactions.
- �� Option A → Friction is not involved in electrostatic potential energy calculations.
- �� Option B → Electrostatic force is conservative, not non-conservative.
- �� Option D → The origin does not determine the assembly energy.
Used – NCERT Recall
- Application
- Recall the characteristics of conservative forces.
- Final Logic
- Conservative forces make total work path independent.
Conservative Force → Same Final Energy
17 In determining the potential energy of a charge in an external field, what is critically assumed about the test charge q?
�� The charge is treated as a test charge. �� External sources remain unchanged. �� Potential energy is calculated using the existing field.
When calculating the potential energy of a charge in an external electric field, the charge is assumed to be small enough that it does not significantly disturb the sources producing the field. This allows the external field to remain unchanged during the calculation. Under this assumption, if the external potential at a point is V and the charge is q, the potential energy is This approximation is fundamental in electrostatics and permits the independent analysis of a charge placed in a pre-existing electric field.
- �� Option A → A test charge is assumed not to alter the external field significantly.
- �� Option B → The external field is produced by external sources.
- �� Option D → A test charge does not neutralize the field.
Used – NCERT Recall
- Application
- Recall the assumptions involved in defining a test charge.
- Final Logic
- The external field must remain essentially unchanged.
Test Charge → Tiny Influence
18 If an electron is placed at a position where the external potential is 10 V, its potential energy is:
�� Use U = qV. �� Electron charge is negative. �� Potential energy becomes negative.
Potential energy of a charge in an external electric field is For an electron, Given, Substituting, The negative sign arises because the electron carries negative charge. Therefore, the potential energy of the electron at that point is
- �� Option A → Sign of electron charge is ignored.
- �� Option C → Incorrect power of ten.
- �� Option D → Calculation error in multiplication.
Used – Substitution
- Application
- Apply the formula U = qV using the electron charge.
- Final Logic
- Negative charge produces negative potential energy for positive potential.
Electron = Negative Charge = Negative U
19 Correct statements about the Electron Volt:
1. It is fundamentally a unit of power, not energy.
2. It is defined as the energy gained by an electron accelerated by a 1 volt potential difference.
3. 1 eV = 1.6 × 10⁻¹⁹ J.
�� Electron volt is a unit of energy. �� Defined using an electron and 1 volt. �� Widely used in atomic and nuclear physics.
An electron volt (eV) is defined as the energy gained by an electron when it moves through a potential difference of 1 volt. Since the charge of an electron is the corresponding energy is Therefore, statements 2 and 3 are correct. Statement 1 is incorrect because electron volt is a unit of energy, not power. It is frequently used in atomic, nuclear and particle physics because the joule is too large for microscopic energy scales.
- �� Option B → Statement 1 is incorrect.
- �� Option C → Statement 1 is incorrect.
- �� Option D → Statement 2 is also correct.
Used – NCERT Recall
- Application
- Recall the definition and SI conversion of the electron volt.
- Final Logic
- Electron volt measures energy, not power.
1 Volt + Electron = 1 eV
20 Conversion of 1 GeV to Joules:
�� 1 eV = 1.6 × 10⁻¹⁹ J. �� 1 GeV = 10⁹ eV. �� Multiply the conversion factor accordingly.
The standard conversion is Since Therefore, GeV is a commonly used energy unit in particle physics because elementary particles often possess energies in the giga-electron-volt range.
- �� Option A → Corresponds to 1 eV.
- �� Option B → Corresponds to 1 MeV.
- �� Option C → Incorrect power of ten.
Used – Substitution
- Application
- Convert GeV into eV and then into joules.
- Final Logic
- .
GeV → Add 9 to the Exponent
