CUET UG Mathematics Booster Test 2 - Fundamentals and Basic Properties of Determinants
π Answers are locked once submitted β results and explanations appear at the end.
QUESTION 1 OF 20
The cost of 4 kg onion, 3 kg wheat, and 2 kg rice is βΉ60. The equation in matrix form uses coefficients of quantities. The first row of the matrix is:
QUESTION 2 OF 20
For a system of linear equations AX=B, if Ais singular (detβ‘(A)=0)and the system is inconsistent, then:
QUESTION 3 OF 20
Assertion (A): Any rectangular matrix can have a determinant.
Reason (R): Determinant is obtained by multiplying all elements.
QUESTION 4 OF 20
If
\(A=\left(\begin{pmatrix}2 & 1\\ 3 & 4\end{pmatrix}\right)\)
then what does β£Aβ£ represent numerically?
QUESTION 5 OF 20
How many of the following matrices have determinants?
β’ 2Γ2
β’ 3Γ5
β’ 4Γ4
β’ 1Γ3
QUESTION 6 OF 20
Match the following
| List 1 | List 2 |
|---|---|
| 1. β‘1 2β€βββ£2 4β¦ | a. Has inverse |
| 2. β‘2 1β€βββ£3 2β¦ | b. Has no inverse |
| 3. det(A) = 0 | c. Singular matrix |
| 4. det(A) β 0 | d. Nonsingular matrix |
QUESTION 7 OF 20
If the dot product of two orthogonal vectors is placed in a 1Γ1matrix, what is its determinant?
QUESTION 8 OF 20
Evaluate the determinant: [β-3]
QUESTION 9 OF 20
Find the value(s) of x such that
\(β£\begin{pmatrix}x & 2\\ 3 & x\end{pmatrix}β£=0\)
QUESTION 10 OF 20
Evaluate the determinant:
\(β£\begin{pmatrix}4 & 2\\ 1 & 3\end{pmatrix}β£\)
QUESTION 11 OF 20
For the matrix
\(\left(\begin{pmatrix}1 & 2 & 3\\ 0 & 4 & 5\\ 1 & 0 & 6\end{pmatrix}\right)\)
which methods can be used to find its determinant?
(i) Row expansion
(ii) Column expansion
(iii) Cofactor method
(iv) Sarrus rule
QUESTION 12 OF 20
How many terms are obtained when expanding the determinant of a 3Γ3 matrix?
QUESTION 13 OF 20
Arrange the following matrices in descending order of their determinant values:
1. \(\left(\begin{pmatrix}5 & 2\\ 1 & 4\end{pmatrix}\right)\)
2. \(\left(\begin{pmatrix}7 & 3\\ 2 & 6\end{pmatrix}\right)\)
3. \(\left(\begin{pmatrix}1 & 1\\ 1 & 1\end{pmatrix}\right)\)
4. \(\left(\begin{pmatrix}3 & 2\\ 1 & 2\end{pmatrix}\right)\)
QUESTION 14 OF 20
Find the area of the triangle with vertices (1,2),(2,4),(3,6) using determinant method.
QUESTION 15 OF 20
Assertion (A): The minor and cofactor always have opposite signs.
Reason (R): The cofactor is given by \(C_{ij}=(-1)^{\left(i,\ j\right)}M_{ij}\).
QUESTION 16 OF 20
Given a matrix-based data structure with defined cofactors, the evaluated operational sum is:
QUESTION 17 OF 20
If two rows of a matrix become identical, the determinant of the matrix is:
QUESTION 18 OF 20
If two columns of a matrix are identical, what is the probability that its inverse exists?
QUESTION 19 OF 20
If A is a 3Γ3 matrix and detβ‘(kA)=27detβ‘(A), find k.
QUESTION 20 OF 20
If \(detβ‘(A)=3\) and the matrix is scaled appropriately, find the new determinant value.
Test Complete!
Answer Review
1 The cost of 4 kg onion, 3 kg wheat, and 2 kg rice is βΉ60. The equation in matrix form uses coefficients of quantities. The first row of the matrix is:
Matrix coefficients come from variable quantities. Coefficients are 4, 3, and 2. Constant 60 belongs to RHS matrix.
In matrix form, coefficients of variables form the matrix A. Here onion, wheat, and rice quantities are 4, 3, and 2 respectively, so the row becomes [4 3 2]. Option A uses identity-like entries. Option B contains the constant term. Option D changes the correct coefficient order given in the equation.
- Option A β [1 1 1] does not represent the actual coefficients from the equation. It ignores the quantities of onion, wheat, and rice.
- Option B β 60 is the constant term on the RHS of the equation, not part of the coefficient matrix row.
- Option D β Although it contains the same numbers, the order is incorrect. Matrix entries must follow the variable order exactly.
Used: Substitution
Application:
- Identify coefficients directly from the equation and place them in the same variable order.
Final Logic:
- The coefficients of onion, wheat, and rice are 4, 3, and 2 respectively.
"Matrix row = coefficients in order."
2 For a system of linear equations AX=B, if Ais singular (detβ‘(A)=0)and the system is inconsistent, then:
Singular matrix has determinant zero. Inconsistent systems have no solution. Inverse method cannot be used.
If det(A)=0, the matrix is singular and has no inverse. A system is inconsistent when equations contradict each other, producing no common solution. Therefore the system has no solution. Option A is for nonsingular matrices. Option B applies to dependent consistent systems. Option C is impossible because inverse exists only when determinant is nonzero.
- Option A β Unique solutions occur only when det(A) β 0. Singular matrices cannot guarantee uniqueness.
- Option B β Infinitely many solutions occur for consistent dependent systems, not inconsistent systems.
- Option C β Inverse matrix method requires Aβ»ΒΉ to exist. Singular matrices do not have inverses.
Used: Elimination
Application:
- Remove options involving inverse or consistency because the question explicitly states singular and inconsistent.
Final Logic:
- "Inconsistent" directly implies "no solution."
"Inconsistent = Impossible intersection."
3 Assertion (A): Any rectangular matrix can have a determinant.
Reason (R): Determinant is obtained by multiplying all elements.
Determinants exist only for square matrices. Determinant is not product of all entries. Both statements are incorrect.
A determinant is defined only for square matrices. Rectangular matrices do not possess determinants. Also, determinants are calculated using specific expansion rules, not by multiplying all matrix elements. Therefore both Assertion and Reason are false. The determinant involves signed combinations of products, not a direct multiplication of every element.
- Option B β Assertion is false because rectangular matrices do not have determinants.
- Option C β Both statements are not true. The reason itself is mathematically incorrect.
- Option D β Reason is false because determinant evaluation follows expansion formulas, not direct multiplication of all elements.
Used: Extreme Word Filter
Application:
- Words like "any" and "all" often indicate incorrect universal statements in mathematics.
Final Logic:
- Only square matrices have determinants, and determinants are not simple products.
"Square only for determinant."
4 If
\(A=\left(\begin{pmatrix}2 & 1\\ 3 & 4\end{pmatrix}\right)\)
then what does β£Aβ£ represent numerically?
Use 2Γ2 determinant formula. Formula is adβbc. 2Γ4β1Γ3 = 5.
For a 2Γ2 matrix, determinant is calculated using: \(β£\begin{pmatrix}a & b\\ c & d\end{pmatrix}β£=ad-bc\) Substituting values gives: 2Γ4 β 1Γ3 = 8 β 3 = 5. Hence Option A is correct. Option B is only ad. Option C adds terms incorrectly. Option D results from wrong arithmetic operations.
- Option B β 8 comes from multiplying diagonal entries only and ignores subtraction of cross products.
- Option C β 10 is not obtained from the determinant formula and reflects incorrect addition.
- Option D β 11 results from adding products instead of subtracting them according to determinant rules.
Used: Substitution
Application:
- Directly apply the standard 2Γ2 determinant formula.
Final Logic:
- Using adβbc gives 8β3 = 5.
"Main diagonal minus cross diagonal."
5 How many of the following matrices have determinants?
β’ 2Γ2
β’ 3Γ5
β’ 4Γ4
β’ 1Γ3
Determinants exist only for square matrices. 2Γ2 and 4Γ4 are square. Total = 2 matrices.
A determinant exists only for square matrices where number of rows equals number of columns. Among the given matrices, 2Γ2 and 4Γ4 are square matrices. The matrices 3Γ5 and 1Γ3 are rectangular and do not have determinants. Therefore exactly two matrices possess determinants.
- Option A β Incorrect because there are two square matrices, not one.
- Option C β Includes one rectangular matrix incorrectly as having a determinant.
- Option D β Determinants are not defined for all matrices listed because some are rectangular.
Used: Odd One Out
Application:
- Separate square matrices from rectangular matrices to identify valid determinant cases.
Final Logic:
- Only 2Γ2 and 4Γ4 satisfy rows = columns.
"Square means determinant."
6 Match the following
| List 1 | List 2 |
|---|---|
| 1. β‘1 2β€βββ£2 4β¦ | a. Has inverse |
| 2. β‘2 1β€βββ£3 2β¦ | b. Has no inverse |
| 3. det(A) = 0 | c. Singular matrix |
| 4. det(A) β 0 | d. Nonsingular matrix |
First matrix determinant is zero. Second matrix determinant is nonzero. det(A)=0 β singular; det(A)β 0 β nonsingular.
For the first matrix, determinant = 1Γ4β2Γ2 = 0, so it has no inverse. For the second matrix, determinant = 2Γ2β1Γ3 = 1 β 0, so inverse exists. Also, det(A)=0 indicates singular matrix, while det(A)β 0 indicates nonsingular matrix. Hence Option B is correct. The provided answer D is incorrect.
- Option A β Reverses inverse properties and singular/nonsingular meanings incorrectly.
- Option C β Confuses determinant conditions with inverse properties. A singular matrix cannot have an inverse.
- Option D β Incorrectly matches det(A)=0 with nonsingular and det(A)β 0 with singular.
Used: Elimination
Application:
- Use determinant values to eliminate impossible inverse and singularity pairings.
Final Logic:
- Zero determinant means singular and no inverse; nonzero means inverse exists.
"Zero det β zero inverse."
7 If the dot product of two orthogonal vectors is placed in a 1Γ1matrix, what is its determinant?
Orthogonal vectors have zero dot product. Determinant of 1Γ1 matrix equals entry itself. Hence determinant equals 0.
Orthogonal vectors satisfy: \(\vec{a}β \vec{b}=0\) A 1Γ1 determinant equals the single element inside it. Therefore determinant of [0] is 0. Option B and C are unrelated numerical values. Option D is incorrect because determinants of 1Γ1 matrices are well defined.
- Option B β Orthogonal vectors do not produce dot product 1 in general.
- Option C β No negative value arises because orthogonal vectors have zero scalar product.
- Option D β Determinants of order 1 are properly defined and equal the only entry present.
Used: Substitution
Application:
- Replace the dot product value using orthogonality property.
Final Logic:
- Orthogonal vectors give dot product 0, so determinant is 0.
"Orthogonal β dot product zero."
8 Evaluate the determinant: [β-3]
This is a 1Γ1 determinant. Determinant equals the single entry. Therefore value is β3.
For a determinant of order 1, the determinant is simply the number itself. Thus: \(β£-3β£=-3\) Here the vertical bars denote determinant notation, not modulus. Hence Option A is correct. Options B, C, and D ignore the determinant definition for 1Γ1 matrices.
- Option B β Confuses determinant notation with modulus notation and changes sign incorrectly.
- Option C β There is no operation leading to zero.
- Option D β Determinant of a 1Γ1 matrix equals the entry itself, not necessarily one.
Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application:
- Recognize determinant notation instead of absolute value notation.
Final Logic:
- A 1Γ1 determinant equals its only element.
"One box = same value."
9 Find the value(s) of x such that
\(β£\begin{pmatrix}x & 2\\ 3 & x\end{pmatrix}β£=0\)
Use determinant formula adβbc. Equation becomes xΒ²β6=0. Solutions are Β±β6.
Using the determinant formula: \(β£\begin{pmatrix}x & 2\\ 3 & x\end{pmatrix}β£=x^{2}-6\) Setting determinant equal to zero gives: \(x^{2}-6=0x=\pm \sqrt{6}\) Hence Option C is correct. Options A, B, and D do not satisfy the determinant equation because substituting them does not produce zero.
- Option A β Substituting x=2 gives determinant 4β6 = β2, not zero.
- Option B β Substituting x=3 gives determinant 9β6 = 3, not zero.
- Option D β Substituting x=6 gives determinant 36β6 = 30, not zero.
Used: Substitution
Application:
- Apply determinant formula and solve resulting quadratic equation.
Final Logic:
- xΒ²β6 = 0 gives x = Β±β6.
"adβbc β quadratic."
10 Evaluate the determinant:
\(β£\begin{pmatrix}4 & 2\\ 1 & 3\end{pmatrix}β£\)
Use determinant formula adβbc. 4Γ3β2Γ1 = 12β2. Determinant equals 10.
Using the determinant formula for order 2: \(β£\begin{pmatrix}a & b\\ c & d\end{pmatrix}β£=ad-bc\) we get: \(4\times 3-2\times 1=12-2=10\) Hence determinant equals 10. Both Option A and D display the same value numerically, but the first correct occurrence is Option A. Option B and C ignore subtraction.
- Option B β 12 is only the product of the main diagonal and ignores subtraction of cross products.
- Option C β 8 comes from incorrect arithmetic manipulation.
- Option D β Numerically correct but duplicated; conventionally first correct option is chosen.
Used: Substitution
Application:
- Insert entries into the determinant formula directly.
Final Logic:
- adβbc = 12β2 = 10.
"Multiply diagonals, then subtract."
11 For the matrix
\(\left(\begin{pmatrix}1 & 2 & 3\\ 0 & 4 & 5\\ 1 & 0 & 6\end{pmatrix}\right)\)
which methods can be used to find its determinant?
(i) Row expansion
(ii) Column expansion
(iii) Cofactor method
(iv) Sarrus rule
3Γ3 determinants allow several methods. Row and column expansions are valid. Sarrus rule works only for 3Γ3 matrices.
A determinant of order 3 can be evaluated by row expansion, column expansion, cofactor expansion, or Sarrus rule. Since cofactor expansion is included within row/column expansion ideas, the correct combination here is Option A containing row expansion, column expansion, and Sarrus rule. The provided matrix is specifically a 3Γ3 determinant where all these methods are applicable.
- Option B β Excludes column expansion and Sarrus rule, both of which are valid for 3Γ3 determinants.
- Option C β Omits row expansion even though determinant expansion along rows is a standard method.
- Option D β Leaves out row and column expansion methods, which are fundamental determinant evaluation techniques.
Used: Option Grouping
Application:
- Identify all universally valid determinant methods for 3Γ3 matrices and eliminate incomplete combinations.
Final Logic:
- 3Γ3 determinants support row, column, cofactor, and Sarrus methods.
"3Γ3 β Sarrus works."
12 How many terms are obtained when expanding the determinant of a 3Γ3 matrix?
3Γ3 determinant expansion has factorial terms. Number of terms = 3! Therefore total terms = 6.
A determinant of order n contains n! terms in its complete expansion. For a 3Γ3 determinant: \(3!=6\) Hence six terms appear in the expanded form. Option A undercounts the terms. Option C and D exceed the actual number generated by determinant permutations.
- Option A β Three terms occur only in cofactor expansion form, not in the complete determinant expansion.
- Option C β Nine terms would imply all element combinations, which determinant expansion does not use.
- Option D β Twelve exceeds the factorial count for a 3Γ3 determinant.
Used: Substitution
Application:
- Use factorial rule for determinant expansion directly.
Final Logic:
- For order 3, total terms = 3! = 6.
"Order n β n! terms."
13 Arrange the following matrices in descending order of their determinant values:
1. \(\left(\begin{pmatrix}5 & 2\\ 1 & 4\end{pmatrix}\right)\)
2. \(\left(\begin{pmatrix}7 & 3\\ 2 & 6\end{pmatrix}\right)\)
3. \(\left(\begin{pmatrix}1 & 1\\ 1 & 1\end{pmatrix}\right)\)
4. \(\left(\begin{pmatrix}3 & 2\\ 1 & 2\end{pmatrix}\right)\)
Compute determinants using adβbc. Values are 36, 18, 4, and 0. Descending order gives 2,1,4,3.
Determinants are: \(5(4)-2(1)=187(6)-3(2)=361(1)-1(1)=03(2)-2(1)=4\) Descending order is: 36 > 18 > 4 > 0 Hence arrangement becomes 2,1,4,3. Therefore Option A is correct. The provided answer C is incorrect because it places determinant 18 before 36 incorrectly.
- Option B β Places the zero determinant first, which cannot be greatest.
- Option C β Incorrectly swaps first two matrices despite determinant 36 being Ψ£ΩΨ¨Ψ± than 18.
- Option D β Does not follow determinant magnitude order at all.
Used: Substitution
Application:
- Evaluate each determinant individually and compare numerically.
Final Logic:
- 36 > 18 > 4 > 0 gives order 2,1,4,3.
"Compute first, arrange later."
14 Find the area of the triangle with vertices (1,2),(2,4),(3,6) using determinant method.
Points are collinear. Collinear points form zero area triangle. Determinant value becomes zero.
Area of a triangle using determinants is: \(Area=\frac{1}{2}β£\begin{pmatrix}x_{1} & y_{1} & 1\\ x_{2} & y_{2} & 1\\ x_{3} & y_{3} & 1\end{pmatrix}β£\) The given points satisfy the same linear relation and lie on one straight line. Hence determinant becomes zero, making the triangle's area zero. Therefore Option C is correct. Nonzero areas in other options contradict collinearity.
- Option A β Area cannot be 1 because collinear points do not enclose any region.
- Option B β Determinant evaluation for these points gives zero, not two.
- Option D β A positive area requires non-collinear vertices, which is not true here.
Used: Elimination
Application:
- Recognize that all points lie on the same line, immediately implying zero area.
Final Logic:
- Collinear points always form zero-area triangles.
"Straight line β zero area."
15 Assertion (A): The minor and cofactor always have opposite signs.
Reason (R): The cofactor is given by \(C_{ij}=(-1)^{\left(i,\ j\right)}M_{ij}\).
Cofactor sign depends on position. Minor and cofactor may have same sign. Formula for cofactor is correct.
The cofactor of an element is: \(C_{ij}=(-1)^{i+j}M_{ij}\) This formula is correct, so Reason is true. However, minor and cofactor are not always opposite in sign. When i+j is even, sign remains positive and cofactor equals the minor. Therefore Assertion is false while Reason is true. Hence Option D is correct.
- Option A β Reason is mathematically correct because it gives the standard cofactor formula.
- Option B β Assertion itself is false since signs are not always opposite.
- Option C β Assertion is false, so both statements cannot be true together.
Used: Extreme Word Filter
Application:
- The word "always" signals possible exception cases in sign patterns.
Final Logic:
- When i+j is even, minor and cofactor have the same sign.
"Even sum β same sign."
16 Given a matrix-based data structure with defined cofactors, the evaluated operational sum is:
No matrix or cofactor values are provided. Determinant operations need explicit entries. Numerical result cannot be evaluated.
The question does not provide the actual matrix, cofactors, determinant expression, or operational details. Without numerical values or a defined formula, no mathematical evaluation can be performed. Therefore none of the options can be verified logically. The provided answer B) 0 is unsupported because insufficient information is available to compute any operational sum.
- Option A β No calculation or matrix values justify β24.
- Option B β Zero cannot be concluded without determinant or cofactor information.
- Option C β The value 90 is unsupported because the expression itself is missing.
- Option D β β66 also lacks any computational basis from the question statement.
Used: Elimination
Application:
- Check whether sufficient mathematical data exists before attempting computation.
Final Logic:
- A determinant-related value cannot be evaluated without the actual matrix or formula.
"No matrix β no determinant."
17 If two rows of a matrix become identical, the determinant of the matrix is:
Equal rows make rows linearly dependent. Determinant becomes zero. Such matrices are singular.
One important determinant property states that if any two rows or columns are identical, then the determinant equals zero. Identical rows create linear dependence, meaning the matrix loses invertibility. Therefore Option C is correct. Options A and B are arbitrary values. Option D is wrong because determinants remain defined for square matrices.
- Option A β Determinant does not become one due to identical rows.
- Option B β No determinant property gives β1 for equal rows.
- Option D β The determinant exists but evaluates to zero for such matrices.
Used: Elimination
Application:
- Use the standard determinant property regarding identical rows.
Final Logic:
- Equal rows imply determinant zero.
"Same rows β zero determinant."
18 If two columns of a matrix are identical, what is the probability that its inverse exists?
Identical columns give determinant zero. Zero determinant means singular matrix. Singular matrices have no inverse.
When two columns are identical, determinant becomes zero because columns are linearly dependent. A matrix with determinant zero is singular and therefore noninvertible. Since inverse cannot exist in such cases, the probability of existence of inverse is zero. Hence Option D is correct. All other probabilities contradict determinant properties.
- Option A β Inverse never exists when determinant equals zero.
- Option B β There is no partial probability concept here; inverse existence is definite.
- Option C β Determinant properties give a strict conclusion, not a fractional chance.
Used: Elimination
Application:
- Apply determinant-zero condition directly to inverse existence.
Final Logic:
- Identical columns β determinant zero β no inverse.
"Same columns, inverse gone."
19 If A is a 3Γ3 matrix and detβ‘(kA)=27detβ‘(A), find k.
For nΓn matrices, det(kA)=kβΏdet(A). Here n=3. So kΒ³=27 giving k=3.
For an nΓn matrix: \(detβ‘(kA)=k^{n}detβ‘(A)\) Since A is a 3Γ3 matrix: \(k^{3}detβ‘(A)=27detβ‘(A)\) Thus: \(k^{3}=27k=3\) Hence Option C is correct. The provided answer A is incorrect because 27 is the determinant scaling factor, not k itself.
- Option A β 27 equals kΒ³, not the value of k.
- Option B β 9Β³ gives 729, not 27.
- Option D β 81Β³ is far larger than the required scaling factor.
Used: Substitution
Application:
- Use determinant scaling property directly for 3Γ3 matrices.
Final Logic:
- kΒ³ = 27 gives k = 3.
"3Γ3 β cube scaling."
20 If \(detβ‘(A)=3\) and the matrix is scaled appropriately, find the new determinant value.
Scaling factor is not specified. Determinant scaling depends on matrix order and scalar. Numerical answer cannot be uniquely found.
To determine the new determinant after scaling, both the scalar multiplier k and the matrix order n are necessary because: \(detβ‘(kA)=k^{n}detβ‘(A)\) The question provides only det(A)=3 but omits the scaling factor and matrix order. Therefore no unique numerical answer can be computed. The provided answer B) 108 is unsupported due to insufficient information.
- Option A β No given scaling information produces 27 uniquely.
- Option B β 108 could arise only under specific missing conditions.
- Option C β The determinant cannot be fixed as 4 without matrix details.
- Option D β No valid determinant scaling data supports 12 uniquely.
Used: Elimination
Application:
- Verify whether all required determinant-scaling information is available before calculation.
Final Logic:
- Without matrix order and scalar multiplier, determinant scaling cannot be evaluated.
"No k, no new determinant."
