CUET UG Mathematics Booster Test 2 - Expansion Methods and Evaluation of Determinants
📌 Answers are locked once submitted — results and explanations appear at the end.
QUESTION 1 OF 20
Evaluate the determinant:
\(∣\begin{pmatrix}1 & 2 & 3\\ 2 & 4 & 6\\ 3 & 6 & 9\end{pmatrix}∣\)
QUESTION 2 OF 20
Match each minor with its numerical value for the matrix
\(\left(\begin{pmatrix}1 & 2 & 3\\ 0 & 4 & 5\\ 2 & 1 & 3\end{pmatrix}\right)\)
| List I | List II |
|---|---|
| 1. \(M_{11}\) | a. 7 |
| 2. \(M_{12}\) | b. -10 |
| 3. \(M_{22}\) | c. -8 |
| 4. \(M_{31}\) | d. -2 |
QUESTION 3 OF 20
For the matrix
\(\left(\begin{pmatrix}1 & 2 & 3\\ 4 & 5 & 6\\ 7 & 8 & 9\end{pmatrix}\right)\)
which of the following expressions correctly represent the determinant when expanded along the second row?
I. \(-4(2⋅9-8⋅3)\)
II. \(+5(1⋅9-7⋅3)\)
III. \(-6(1⋅8-7⋅2)\)
QUESTION 4 OF 20
For the matrix
\(\left(\begin{pmatrix}2 & 1 & 3\\ 4 & 5 & 6\\ 7 & 8 & 9\end{pmatrix}\right)\)
which statement is INCORRECT during expansion?
QUESTION 5 OF 20
Find the value of k if the area of triangle with vertices \(\left(k,0),(4,0),(0,2\right)\)is 4 sq units.
QUESTION 6 OF 20
To find the equation of the line passing through \(\left(1,\ 2\right)\)and \(\left(3,\ 6\right)\)using determinants, the area of the triangle formed with a general point \(\left(x,\ y\right)\)must be:
QUESTION 7 OF 20
Evaluate the determinant by expanding along the first column:
\(∣\begin{pmatrix}1 & 2 & 3\\ 0 & 1 & 4\\ 0 & 2 & 8\end{pmatrix}∣\)
QUESTION 8 OF 20
A matrix represents a transition probability system. If the determinant of the matrix is non-zero, then the matrix is invertible. What is the relation between the determinant and invertibility?
QUESTION 9 OF 20
The volume of a parallelepiped is given by a scalar triple product (determinant of order 3). If two columns (say \(C_{2}\)and \(C_{3}\)) are interchanged, the determinant becomes:
QUESTION 10 OF 20
If three points are collinear, then the area of the triangle formed using determinant method is:
QUESTION 11 OF 20
Evaluate the determinant:
\(∣\begin{pmatrix}1 & 2 & \int_{0}^{1}\,x dx\\ 3 & 4 & \int_{0}^{1}\,x^{2} dx\\ 5 & 6 & \int_{0}^{1}\,0 dx\end{pmatrix}∣\)
QUESTION 12 OF 20
Assertion (A): Determinant of a matrix can be expanded along any row or column.
Reason (R): Determinant can only be calculated along rows.
QUESTION 13 OF 20
Arrange the matrices based on number of non-zero minor calculations required (highest effort → lowest effort):
1. Matrix with no zeros
2. Matrix with one zero
3. Matrix with two zeros in \(R_{1}\)
4. Matrix with three zeros in \(C_{1}\)
QUESTION 14 OF 20
Also, ∣AB∣=∣A∣⋅∣B∣.
If A and B are non-singular matrices of order 3, then ∣AB∣ is:
QUESTION 15 OF 20
Also, ∣AB∣=∣A∣⋅∣B∣.
If matrix A is singular, then which of the following is true?
QUESTION 16 OF 20
If A is a square matrix of order 3, then \(∣A^{T}∣\)is equal to:
QUESTION 17 OF 20
If
\(A=\left(\begin{pmatrix}2 & 3\\ 4 & 5\end{pmatrix}\right),\)
evaluate \(4∣A∣\).
QUESTION 18 OF 20
Consider a system of linear equations with coefficient determinant Δ, and determinants Δx, Δy (Cramer's Rule). Which statement is incorrect?
QUESTION 19 OF 20
Assertion (A): Area of a triangle formed by collinear points is 1.
Reason (R): Determinant of an identity matrix is 0.
QUESTION 20 OF 20
Match determinant conditions with system outcomes (Cramer's Rule):
| List I | List II |
|---|---|
| 1. Δ≠0 | a. Inconsistent (no solution) |
| 2. Δ=0, Δx≠0 | b. Inconsistent (no solution) |
| 3. Δ=0, Δx=0, Δy=0 | c. Consistent with infinitely many solutions |
| 4. Δ=0, Δx=0, Δy≠0 | d. Consistent with unique solution |
Test Complete!
Answer Review
1 Evaluate the determinant:
\(∣\begin{pmatrix}1 & 2 & 3\\ 2 & 4 & 6\\ 3 & 6 & 9\end{pmatrix}∣\)
Rows are proportional to each other. Determinant becomes zero for dependent rows. Matrix is singular.
The second row is twice the first row and the third row is three times the first row. Since all rows are linearly dependent, determinant becomes zero. Hence Option C is correct. Options A, B, and D are impossible because a determinant with proportional rows must always evaluate to zero.
- Option A → A nonzero determinant cannot occur when rows are proportional.
- Option B → Linear dependence among rows guarantees determinant zero, not three.
- Option D → Six is impossible because the matrix loses independence due to proportional rows.
Used: Elimination
Application:
- Check whether any rows are multiples of each other before expanding the determinant.
Final Logic:
- Proportional rows directly imply determinant zero.
"Same pattern rows → determinant zero."
2 Match each minor with its numerical value for the matrix
\(\left(\begin{pmatrix}1 & 2 & 3\\ 0 & 4 & 5\\ 2 & 1 & 3\end{pmatrix}\right)\)
| List I | List II |
|---|---|
| 1. \(M_{11}\) | a. 7 |
| 2. \(M_{12}\) | b. -10 |
| 3. \(M_{22}\) | c. -8 |
| 4. \(M_{31}\) | d. -2 |
Minors are determinants after deleting row and column. Compute each 2×2 determinant carefully. Matching gives Option B.
\(M_{11}=∣\begin{pmatrix}4 & 5\\ 1 & 3\end{pmatrix}∣=12-5=7M_{12}=∣\begin{pmatrix}0 & 5\\ 2 & 3\end{pmatrix}∣=0-10=-10M_{22}=∣\begin{pmatrix}1 & 3\\ 2 & 3\end{pmatrix}∣=3-6=-3M_{31}=∣\begin{pmatrix}2 & 3\\ 4 & 5\end{pmatrix}∣=10-12=-2\) Hence the correct matching should actually be: 1–a, 2–b, 4–d. Since \(M_{22}=-3\) is absent in options, the question contains an error. The provided answer B is incorrect.
- Option A → Incorrectly assigns \(M_{12}=-8\), while actual value is −10.
- Option C → Swaps values for \(M_{11}\)and \(M_{12}\), giving incorrect pairings.
- Option D → Gives wrong determinant values for several minors.
Used: Substitution
Application:
- Calculate every minor individually using the 2×2 determinant formula.
Final Logic:
- Correct minor values do not fully match any option because the question has a data error.
"Delete row-column → small determinant."
3 For the matrix
\(\left(\begin{pmatrix}1 & 2 & 3\\ 4 & 5 & 6\\ 7 & 8 & 9\end{pmatrix}\right)\)
which of the following expressions correctly represent the determinant when expanded along the second row?
I. \(-4(2⋅9-8⋅3)\)
II. \(+5(1⋅9-7⋅3)\)
III. \(-6(1⋅8-7⋅2)\)
Row 2 sign pattern is −,+,−. Each term uses corresponding minor. All three expressions are correct.
Expansion along second row follows cofactors: \(-,+,-\) Thus determinant becomes: \(-4M_{21}+5M_{22}-6M_{23}\) Each given expression correctly represents its corresponding cofactor expansion term. Therefore all three statements are valid and Option D is correct.
- Option A → Omits the valid third term involving element 6.
- Option B → Excludes the valid middle cofactor term involving element 5.
- Option C → Ignores the correctly signed first cofactor term.
Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application:
- Use row-wise cofactor sign pattern to verify each expansion term.
Final Logic:
- Second-row expansion uses −,+,− signs for all three cofactors.
"Second row → minus plus minus."
4 For the matrix
\(\left(\begin{pmatrix}2 & 1 & 3\\ 4 & 5 & 6\\ 7 & 8 & 9\end{pmatrix}\right)\)
which statement is INCORRECT during expansion?
Minor is unsigned determinant. Cofactor includes sign factor. Expansion value remains same across rows/columns.
A minor is simply the determinant obtained after deleting a row and column. It does not include any sign. Sign is introduced only in the cofactor: \(C_{ij}=(-1)^{i+j}M_{ij}\) Hence Option B is incorrect. Options A, C, and D are correct determinant properties.
- Option A → Correct because second-row cofactor signs are −,+,−.
- Option C → Correct standard formula for cofactors.
- Option D → Determinant value remains same regardless of expansion row or column chosen.
Used: Elimination
Application:
- Differentiate clearly between minor and cofactor definitions.
Final Logic:
- Minor has no sign; cofactor introduces sign factor.
"Minor plain, cofactor signed."
5 Find the value of k if the area of triangle with vertices \(\left(k,0),(4,0),(0,2\right)\)is 4 sq units.
Use determinant area formula. Area equation gives \(∣4-k∣=4\). Solutions are k=0 and k=8.
Using triangle area formula: \(Area=\frac{1}{2}∣∣\begin{pmatrix}k & 0 & 1\\ 4 & 0 & 1\\ 0 & 2 & 1\end{pmatrix}∣∣\) Area simplifies to: \(∣4-k∣=4\) Thus: \(k=0ork=8\) Hence Option C is correct. Other options include only one valid solution or an incorrect value.
- Option A → Misses the second valid solution k=8.
- Option B → Ignores k=0, which also satisfies the area condition.
- Option D → k=4 gives zero area because points become collinear on the x-axis.
Used: Substitution
Application:
- Apply determinant area formula and solve the resulting absolute-value equation.
Final Logic:
- \(∣4-k∣=4\) gives k=0 or 8.
"Area fixed → absolute equation."
6 To find the equation of the line passing through \(\left(1,\ 2\right)\)and \(\left(3,\ 6\right)\)using determinants, the area of the triangle formed with a general point \(\left(x,\ y\right)\)must be:
Three collinear points form zero area. General point on line must satisfy collinearity. Determinant equals zero.
A point \(\left(x,\ y\right)\)lies on the line joining two points when the three points are collinear. Area of a triangle formed by collinear points is always zero. Therefore determinant equation is set equal to zero. Hence Option D is correct. Other numerical values would imply non-collinearity.
- Option A → Nonzero area indicates the point does not lie on the line.
- Option B → Collinear points cannot form area two.
- Option C → Area is never treated as negative in geometry.
Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application:
- Recognize that line equations from determinants arise from collinearity condition.
Final Logic:
- Collinear points always give zero area.
"Same line → zero area."
7 Evaluate the determinant by expanding along the first column:
\(∣\begin{pmatrix}1 & 2 & 3\\ 0 & 1 & 4\\ 0 & 2 & 8\end{pmatrix}∣\)
First column simplifies expansion. Only first cofactor contributes. Remaining 2×2 determinant is zero.
Expanding along the first column: \(1∣\begin{pmatrix}1 & 4\\ 2 & 8\end{pmatrix}∣=1(8-8)=0\) Thus determinant equals zero. Hence Option A is correct. Other options result from incorrect arithmetic or incomplete cofactor expansion.
- Option B → Ignores subtraction inside the minor determinant.
- Option C → No valid determinant computation gives value two.
- Option D → Negative determinant does not arise after correct evaluation.
Used: Elimination
Application:
- Choose the column with maximum zeros to simplify determinant calculation.
Final Logic:
- Minor determinant becomes 8−8 = 0.
"More zeros → easier determinant."
8 A matrix represents a transition probability system. If the determinant of the matrix is non-zero, then the matrix is invertible. What is the relation between the determinant and invertibility?
Nonzero determinant implies nonsingular matrix. Only nonsingular matrices are invertible. Determinant directly controls inverse existence.
A square matrix is invertible only if its determinant is nonzero: \(∣A∣\neq 0\Rightarrow A^{-1} exists\) Hence Option B is correct. Option A reverses the rule. Option C ignores determinant importance. Option D is unrelated because invertibility depends on determinant, not matrix application type.
- Option A → Zero determinant means singular matrix with no inverse.
- Option C → Determinant is the key condition for invertibility.
- Option D → Inverse existence applies to all nonsingular square matrices, not only probability matrices.
Used: Elimination
Application:
- Use the standard determinant-inverse condition to reject contradictory statements.
Final Logic:
- Nonzero determinant guarantees invertibility.
"Nonzero det → inverse set."
9 The volume of a parallelepiped is given by a scalar triple product (determinant of order 3). If two columns (say \(C_{2}\)and \(C_{3}\)) are interchanged, the determinant becomes:
Interchanging columns changes determinant sign. Magnitude remains same. Determinant becomes negative of original.
One property of determinants states that interchanging any two rows or columns changes the sign of the determinant: \(∣A^{'}∣=-∣A∣\) Therefore swapping \(C_{2}\)and \(C_{3}\)multiplies the determinant by −1. Hence Option C is correct. The determinant neither becomes zero nor doubles automatically.
- Option A → Interchanging columns always changes determinant sign.
- Option B → Determinant becomes zero only under dependent rows or columns.
- Option D → Swapping columns does not affect determinant magnitude.
Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application:
- Recall determinant transformation properties involving row/column interchange.
Final Logic:
- Column interchange changes determinant sign only.
"Swap once → change sign."
10 If three points are collinear, then the area of the triangle formed using determinant method is:
Collinear points lie on same line. No enclosed region is formed. Determinant area becomes zero.
Area of a triangle from determinant formula becomes zero when all three points are collinear because they do not enclose any region. Hence Option D is correct. Positive area requires non-collinear points. Negative or imaginary areas are not geometrically meaningful in this context.
- Option A → Positive area occurs only when points are non-collinear.
- Option B → Geometric area is not taken as negative.
- Option C → Triangle area from coordinates is always real-valued.
Used: Elimination
Application:
- Recognize the geometric meaning of collinearity before evaluating determinants.
Final Logic:
- Collinear points produce zero enclosed area.
"One line → no triangle."
11 Evaluate the determinant:
\(∣\begin{pmatrix}1 & 2 & \int_{0}^{1}\,x dx\\ 3 & 4 & \int_{0}^{1}\,x^{2} dx\\ 5 & 6 & \int_{0}^{1}\,0 dx\end{pmatrix}∣\)
Evaluate definite integrals first. Convert determinant into numerical matrix. Apply 3×3 determinant expansion.
First evaluate integrals: \(\int_{0}^{1}\,x dx=\frac{1}{2},\int_{0}^{1}\,x^{2} dx=\frac{1}{3},\int_{0}^{1}\,0 dx=0\) Thus determinant becomes: \(∣\begin{pmatrix}1 & 2 & 1/2\\ 3 & 4 & 1/3\\ 5 & 6 & 0\end{pmatrix}∣\) Expanding gives: \(1\left(4⋅0-6⋅\frac{1}{3}\right)-2\left(3⋅0-5⋅\frac{1}{3}\right)+\frac{1}{2}(18-20)=-2+\frac{10}{3}-1=\frac{1}{3}\) Hence the correct answer is actually B) 1/3. The provided answer A is incorrect.
- Option A → Incorrect arithmetic after determinant expansion leads to 1/2 instead of 1/3.
- Option C → Determinant evaluation does not simplify to one.
- Option D → Determinant is nonzero because rows are not linearly dependent.
Used: Substitution
Application:
- Evaluate the integrals first and substitute them into the determinant before expansion.
Final Logic:
- After integration and expansion, determinant value becomes 1/3.
"Integrate first, determinant later."
12 Assertion (A): Determinant of a matrix can be expanded along any row or column.
Reason (R): Determinant can only be calculated along rows.
Determinants allow row and column expansion. Expansion is not restricted to rows only. Assertion true, Reason false.
A determinant may be expanded along any row or any column and the final value remains unchanged. Therefore Assertion is true. However, Reason is false because determinants are not restricted only to row expansions. Column expansions are equally valid. Hence Option B correctly represents the logical relationship.
- Option A → Assertion is correct because row and column expansion both work.
- Option C → Reason is false, so both statements cannot be true together.
- Option D → Assertion is not false since determinants can indeed be expanded along any row or column.
Used: Elimination
Application:
- Compare the universal determinant expansion rule with the restrictive statement in the Reason.
Final Logic:
- Determinants expand along rows and columns alike.
"Any row, any column."
13 Arrange the matrices based on number of non-zero minor calculations required (highest effort → lowest effort):
1. Matrix with no zeros
2. Matrix with one zero
3. Matrix with two zeros in \(R_{1}\)
4. Matrix with three zeros in \(C_{1}\)
More zeros reduce determinant calculations. No-zero matrix needs maximum work. Entire zero column gives least effort.
Determinant expansion becomes easier when more zeros are present because fewer minors need evaluation. A matrix with no zeros requires maximum calculations. One zero reduces work slightly. Two zeros in a row simplify expansion significantly. A column with all zeros gives determinant directly as zero with minimum effort. Hence descending effort order is 1,2,3,4.
- Option A → Reverses the effort logic completely by placing easiest case first.
- Option B → Incorrectly places a fully zero column before the two-zero row case.
- Option D → A column with three zeros requires the least effort, not the greatest.
Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application:
- Use the principle that zeros simplify determinant expansion calculations.
Final Logic:
- More zeros mean fewer cofactors and less calculation effort.
"More zeros → less work."
14
Also, ∣AB∣=∣A∣⋅∣B∣.
If A and B are non-singular matrices of order 3, then ∣AB∣ is:
Determinant of product equals product of determinants. Non-singular matrices have nonzero determinants. Multiplication rule applies directly.
For square matrices of same order: \(∣AB∣=∣A∣⋅∣B∣\) This is a standard determinant property. Since A and B are nonsingular, their determinants are nonzero and determinant multiplication law applies directly. Hence Option D is correct. Addition or subtraction rules do not apply to determinant products.
- Option A → Product of two nonsingular matrices cannot have determinant zero.
- Option B → Determinants of matrix products are multiplied, not added.
- Option C → No determinant property states subtraction for products.
Used: Substitution
Application:
- Directly apply the determinant multiplication property from the passage.
Final Logic:
- \(∣AB∣=∣A∣∣B∣\)is the standard determinant rule.
"Product matrix → product determinant."
15
Also, ∣AB∣=∣A∣⋅∣B∣.
If matrix A is singular, then which of the following is true?
Singular matrices have zero determinant. Singular matrices are noninvertible. Identity matrices are nonsingular.
A square matrix is singular precisely when its determinant equals zero. Therefore Option A is correct. Singular matrices do not possess inverses, so Option B is incorrect. Option C is unrelated. Identity matrices always have determinant one, making Option D incorrect.
- Option B → Inverse exists only for nonsingular matrices with nonzero determinant.
- Option C → Determinant one specifically represents special nonsingular cases.
- Option D → Identity matrices are nonsingular, not singular.
Used: Elimination
Application:
- Use the determinant definition of singular matrices directly from the passage.
Final Logic:
- Singular matrix means determinant zero.
"Singular → determinant zero."
16 If A is a square matrix of order 3, then \(∣A^{T}∣\)is equal to:
Determinant remains unchanged under transpose. Row-column interchange preserves value. Applicable for all square matrices.
The determinant of a matrix and its transpose are always equal: \(∣A^{T}∣=∣A∣\) Transpose only interchanges rows and columns without changing determinant value. Therefore Option B is correct. The determinant neither changes sign nor squares automatically after transposition.
- Option A → Sign changes only under row or column interchange, not transpose.
- Option C → Determinant is not squared during transposition.
- Option D → Transpose does not force determinant to become zero.
Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application:
- Recall the determinant-transpose property directly.
Final Logic:
- Transpose preserves determinant value.
"Transpose, same determinant."
17 If
\(A=\left(\begin{pmatrix}2 & 3\\ 4 & 5\end{pmatrix}\right),\)
evaluate \(4∣A∣\).
Compute determinant using ad−bc. Determinant equals −2. Multiply by 4 to get −8.
For matrix: \(A=\left(\begin{pmatrix}2 & 3\\ 4 & 5\end{pmatrix}\right)\) determinant is: \(∣A∣=2(5)-3(4)=10-12=-2\) Thus: \(4∣A∣=4(-2)=-8\) Hence none of the given options are correct. The provided answer C) −24 is incorrect.
- Option A → −12 results from incorrect determinant multiplication.
- Option B → Sign error occurs because determinant itself is negative.
- Option C → Determinant value was wrongly computed before multiplying.
- Option D → Positive 24 contradicts the negative determinant obtained.
Used: Substitution
Application:
- Use the 2×2 determinant formula and multiply the final result by four.
Final Logic:
- \(∣A∣=-2\Rightarrow 4∣A∣=-8\).
"ad−bc first, multiply later."
18 Consider a system of linear equations with coefficient determinant Δ, and determinants Δx, Δy (Cramer's Rule). Which statement is incorrect?
Δ=0 does not guarantee consistency. System may be inconsistent or dependent. Cramer's Rule needs determinant conditions.
If Δ≠0, a unique solution exists and Cramer's Rule applies directly, making Options A and B correct. If Δ=0 and Δx≠0, the system is inconsistent, so Option C is correct. However, Δ=0 alone does not ensure consistency; the system may have infinitely many or no solutions. Hence Option D is incorrect.
- Option A → Correct because nonzero determinant guarantees uniqueness.
- Option B → Correct formula from Cramer's Rule for unique solutions.
- Option C → Correct because Δ=0 with nonzero numerator determinant implies inconsistency.
Used: Elimination
Application:
- Use Cramer's Rule cases to identify the universally false statement.
Final Logic:
- Zero determinant alone cannot determine consistency.
"Δ=0 → check more."
19 Assertion (A): Area of a triangle formed by collinear points is 1.
Reason (R): Determinant of an identity matrix is 0.
Collinear points form zero area. Identity determinant equals one. Both statements are incorrect.
Area of a triangle formed by collinear points is always zero, not one. Also, determinant of the identity matrix equals one: \(∣I∣=1\) Therefore both Assertion and Reason are false. Hence Option A is correct.
- Option B → Assertion is false because collinear points produce zero area.
- Option C → Neither statement is true, so explanation relationship cannot exist.
- Option D → Reason is false since identity determinant equals one, not zero.
Used: Extreme Word Filter
Application:
- Check standard determinant and geometry facts against the given absolute claims.
Final Logic:
- Collinear area is zero and identity determinant is one.
"Identity → determinant one."
20 Match determinant conditions with system outcomes (Cramer's Rule):
| List I | List II |
|---|---|
| 1. Δ≠0 | a. Inconsistent (no solution) |
| 2. Δ=0, Δx≠0 | b. Inconsistent (no solution) |
| 3. Δ=0, Δx=0, Δy=0 | c. Consistent with infinitely many solutions |
| 4. Δ=0, Δx=0, Δy≠0 | d. Consistent with unique solution |
Nonzero Δ gives unique solution. Zero Δ with nonzero numerator gives inconsistency. All zero determinants imply infinitely many solutions.
By Cramer's Rule: • Δ≠0 → unique solution • Δ=0 with any numerator determinant nonzero → inconsistent system • Δ=0 and all numerator determinants zero → infinitely many solutions Thus matching becomes: 1–d, 2–b, 3–c, 4–a Hence Option A is correct.
- Option B → Incorrectly assigns unique solution to a zero-determinant case.
- Option C → Reverses consistent and inconsistent cases incorrectly.
- Option D → Δ≠0 cannot produce infinitely many solutions.
Used: Option Grouping
Application:
- Group determinant conditions into unique, inconsistent, and dependent-system categories.
Final Logic:
- Only nonzero Δ guarantees uniqueness.
"Δ nonzero → one solution."
