CUET UG History Booster Test 3 - Awadh, Annexation and Growing Discontent
📌 Answers are locked once submitted — results and explanations appear at the end.
QUESTION 1 OF 20
Which of the following analytically incorrect regarding the British motivations for annexing Awadh?
QUESTION 2 OF 20
Evaluate the following statements concerning the 1856 annexation:
1. It directly resulted from the British assumption that Wajid Ali Shah was an unpopular ruler.
2. The annexation completed a process that began with the conquest of Bengal.
3. Dalhousie's annexation policies only created disaffection in Awadh and nowhere else.
QUESTION 3 OF 20
Assertion (A): By the terms of the Subsidiary Alliance, the Nawab of Awadh lost his ability to independently assert control over rebellious chiefs.
Reason (R): The Nawab was forced to disband his military force and rely on the British armed contingent.
QUESTION 4 OF 20
Match the consequences of the Subsidiary Alliance on Awadh's sovereignty:
| List 1 | List 2 |
|---|---|
| 1. Military capacity | a. Required permission of the British to engage in warfare |
| 2. Foreign policy | b. Position of the Resident attached to the court |
| 3. Internal law and order | c. Disbandment of Nawab's forces |
| 4. British oversight | d. Increased dependence on British troops |
QUESTION 5 OF 20
The folk song mourning the departure of Wajid Ali Shah exclaimed: "The honourable English came and took the country", which was phrased in the local dialect as "Angrez Bahadur ain, ________".
QUESTION 6 OF 20
Trace the trajectory of the annexation of Awadh logically:
I. Imposition of the Subsidiary Alliance system.
II. Lord Dalhousie declares Awadh a 'cherry that will drop'.
III. Deposition and exile of Wajid Ali Shah.
IV. Disarmament of taluqdars and destruction of forts.
QUESTION 7 OF 20
QUESTION 8 OF 20
QUESTION 9 OF 20
Assertion (A): The Summary Settlement of 1856 successfully settled the land with the actual owners of the soil and reduced the level of exploitation of peasants.
Reason (R): British land revenue officers believed that taluqdars were interlopers who established their hold over land through force and fraud.
QUESTION 10 OF 20
Analyze the autonomy of the pre-British taluqdars:
1. They maintained armed retainers and built forts.
2. Some bigger taluqdars had as many as 12,000 foot-soldiers.
3. They enjoyed absolute independence and did not pay any revenue to the Nawab.
QUESTION 11 OF 20
Identify the incorrect analytical statement regarding the Summary Settlement.
QUESTION 12 OF 20
Match the socio-economic impacts of the British administration:
| List 1 | List 2 |
|---|---|
| 1. State revenue flows | a. Declined from 67% to 38% |
| 2. Peasant revenue burden | b. Increased for the British |
| 3. Taluqdars' land control | c. Reached 30 to 70 per cent in some areas |
| 4. Extent of overassessment | d. Did not decline as expected |
QUESTION 13 OF 20
Assertion (A): Neither taluqdars nor peasants had any reasons to be happy with the British annexation of Awadh.
Reason (R): While taluqdars lost their lands and forts, peasants were exposed to heavy overassessment and inflexible collection methods.
QUESTION 14 OF 20
The disruption of ties of loyalty and patronage meant there was no longer any guarantee that in times of festivities the peasant would get the ________ that the taluqdar had earlier provided.
QUESTION 15 OF 20
Consider the duality of the taluqdars in the pre-British era:
1. They were seen as oppressors who exacted a variety of dues from the peasants.
2. They appeared as generous father figures who were considerate in times of need.
QUESTION 16 OF 20
Identify the incorrect analytical statement regarding the rural resistance in Awadh during 1857.
QUESTION 17 OF 20
Arrange the following interconnected rural-military developments logically:
I. Widespread dispossession of taluqdars and overassessment of peasants.
II. Grievances of the rural world communicated to the sepoy lines.
III. Sepoys defy superior officers and mutiny.
IV. Peasants pour into towns to join the mutinous soldiers.
QUESTION 18 OF 20
Match the sepoy-related factors with their impacts:
| List 1 | List 2 |
|---|---|
| 1. Awadh | a. Carried over into the sepoy lines |
| 2. White officers in 1840s | b. Nursery of the Bengal Army |
| 3. Peasant grievances | c. Father figures and disciplinarians |
| 4. White officers in 1820s | d. Developed a sense of superiority |
QUESTION 19 OF 20
Beyond the immediate spark of the greased cartridges, the sepoys harboured long-standing discontent due to low levels of pay and the difficulty of getting ________.
QUESTION 20 OF 20
Assertion (A): In the 1840s, the trust between sepoys and their white officers was completely replaced by suspicion.
Reason (R): White officers started treating the sepoys as racial inferiors, riding roughshod over their sensibilities through abuse and physical violence.
Test Complete!
Answer Review
1 Which of the following analytically incorrect regarding the British motivations for annexing Awadh?
�� Awadh was annexed in 1856 under Lord Dalhousie. �� The British justified annexation on grounds of "misgovernment." �� Protection of the Nawab was not the objective of annexation.
- NCERT explains that Awadh occupied a strategically and economically important position in North India. British officials believed it could become the principal market of Upper India and valued its fertile soil suitable for indigo and cotton cultivation. → Lord Dalhousie had long desired the annexation of Awadh and famously described it as a "cherry that will drop into our mouth one day." → The annexation completed a process of territorial expansion that had begun with the conquest of Bengal a century earlier. → Option C is incorrect because the British did not annex Awadh to protect the Nawab. In fact, they removed Nawab Wajid Ali Shah from power and annexed the kingdom on the pretext of misgovernment. → Therefore, Option C is the analytically incorrect statement.
- �� Option A → Correct. British officials viewed Awadh as ideally located to become a major commercial centre of Upper India.
- �� Option B → Correct. Contemporary British records praised Awadh's fertile soil for producing indigo and cotton.
- �� Option D → Correct. NCERT explicitly connects the annexation with the culmination of a long process of British territorial expansion.
Used: Elimination
Application:
- �� Eliminate statements directly supported by NCERT evidence regarding economic and territorial motives.
Final Logic:
- �� Since the British dethroned rather than protected the Nawab, Option C is incorrect.
"Cherry, Cotton, Conquest — Not Protection."
2 Evaluate the following statements concerning the 1856 annexation:
1. It directly resulted from the British assumption that Wajid Ali Shah was an unpopular ruler.
2. The annexation completed a process that began with the conquest of Bengal.
3. Dalhousie's annexation policies only created disaffection in Awadh and nowhere else.
�� British believed Awadh was misgoverned. �� Annexation completed a century-long expansion process. �� Disaffection spread beyond Awadh.
- Statement 1 is correct because the British justified annexation by portraying Wajid Ali Shah as an ineffective ruler and assuming he lacked popular support. → Statement 2 is correct because NCERT describes the annexation as completing a process of territorial expansion that began with Bengal. → Statement 3 is incorrect because Dalhousie's annexation policies created resentment in several regions, including Jhansi, Satara, Nagpur, and Awadh. → Therefore only Statements 1 and 2 are correct. → Hence Option A is correct.
- �� Option B → Statement 3 is incorrect.
- �� Option C → Statement 3 is incorrect.
- �� Option D → All statements are not correct because Statement 3 is false.
Used: Option Grouping
Application:
- �� Evaluate each statement independently and identify the correct combination.
Final Logic:
- �� Statements 1 and 2 are supported by NCERT; Statement 3 is not.
"Bengal to Awadh = Expansion Complete."
3 Assertion (A): By the terms of the Subsidiary Alliance, the Nawab of Awadh lost his ability to independently assert control over rebellious chiefs.
Reason (R): The Nawab was forced to disband his military force and rely on the British armed contingent.
�� Subsidiary Alliance weakened Awadh. �� Nawab lost military independence. �� British troops became essential.
- Under the Subsidiary Alliance, the Nawab had to disband his own military force. → British troops were stationed in Awadh, and the Nawab became dependent on them. → Because he lacked an independent army, he could no longer effectively control rebellious taluqdars or chiefs. → Therefore the Reason directly explains the Assertion. → Hence Option D is correct.
- �� Option A → Both statements are actually true.
- �� Option B → Reason is true.
- �� Option C → Reason directly explains the Assertion.
Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application:
- �� Connect military dependence with political weakness.
Final Logic:
- �� No army = no independent authority.
"No Army → No Authority."
4 Match the consequences of the Subsidiary Alliance on Awadh's sovereignty:
| List 1 | List 2 |
|---|---|
| 1. Military capacity | a. Required permission of the British to engage in warfare |
| 2. Foreign policy | b. Position of the Resident attached to the court |
| 3. Internal law and order | c. Disbandment of Nawab's forces |
| 4. British oversight | d. Increased dependence on British troops |
�� Military power reduced. �� Foreign policy controlled. �� British Resident supervised Awadh.
- Military capacity → Disbandment of Nawab's forces (c). → Foreign policy → Required British permission for warfare (a). → Internal law and order → Dependence on British troops (d). → British oversight → Resident attached to court (b). → Hence Option B is correct.
- �� Option A → Incorrect matching.
- �� Option C → Foreign policy and oversight mismatched.
- �� Option D → Multiple incorrect pairings.
Used: Option Grouping
Application:
- �� Match each administrative consequence with its corresponding effect.
Final Logic:
- �� 1-c, 2-a, 3-d, 4-b.
"Force–War–Dependence–Resident."
5 The folk song mourning the departure of Wajid Ali Shah exclaimed: "The honourable English came and took the country", which was phrased in the local dialect as "Angrez Bahadur ain, ________".
�� Folk songs reflected public grief. �� Annexation deeply affected Awadh. �� The phrase appears in NCERT sources.
- The lament recorded in NCERT states: "Angrez Bahadur ain, mulk lai linho." → It reflected people's emotional response to the annexation and exile of Wajid Ali Shah. → Therefore Option C is correct.
- �� Option A → Not the phrase recorded in NCERT.
- �� Option B → Awadh is not used in the quoted line.
- �� Option D → Raj is not the original wording.
Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application:
- �� Recall the exact historical quotation.
Final Logic:
- �� NCERT directly uses "mulk lai linho."
"Mulk was lost."
6 Trace the trajectory of the annexation of Awadh logically:
I. Imposition of the Subsidiary Alliance system.
II. Lord Dalhousie declares Awadh a 'cherry that will drop'.
III. Deposition and exile of Wajid Ali Shah.
IV. Disarmament of taluqdars and destruction of forts.
�� British control began with Subsidiary Alliance. �� Dalhousie planned annexation. �� Nawab was removed before administrative changes.
- First came the Subsidiary Alliance. → Dalhousie later expressed his intention to annex Awadh. → Wajid Ali Shah was deposed and exiled in 1856. → Afterwards taluqdars were disarmed and forts destroyed. Thus sequence A is correct.
- �� Option B → Places Dalhousie's declaration before Alliance.
- �� Option C → Reverses historical chronology.
- �� Option D → Wrong order of Alliance and deposition.
Used: Elimination
Application:
- �� Arrange events chronologically.
Final Logic:
- �� Alliance preceded annexation and exile.
"Alliance → Dalhousie → Exile → Disarm."
7
�� Court culture collapsed. �� Livelihoods disappeared. �� Traditional systems broke down.
- The passage refers to loss of political authority, cultural patronage, social stability and economic security after annexation. → "End of their world" symbolizes collapse of institutions and values associated with Awadh. → Option B captures this broader meaning.
- �� Option A → Passage is metaphorical, not prophetic.
- �� Option C → Focus is social and cultural loss, not physical destruction.
- �� Option D → Democracy was not involved.
Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application:
- �� Interpret the phrase according to passage context.
Final Logic:
- �� The passage emphasizes societal collapse, not literal destruction.
"World = Way of Life."
8
�� Many groups suffered. �� Shared grievances emerged. �� British rule became the common target.
- The passage explicitly mentions a chain linking prince, taluqdar, peasant and sepoy. → Despite differing grievances, they increasingly opposed British rule together. → Hence Option D correctly reflects the meaning.
- �� Option A → Passage stresses connection, not isolation.
- �� Option B → Peasants and sepoys were also affected.
- �� Option C → Many taluqdars joined resistance.
Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application:
- �� Focus on the phrase "linked prince, taluqdar, peasant and sepoy."
Final Logic:
- �� Linkage indicates unity in opposition.
"One Grievance Chain."
9 Assertion (A): The Summary Settlement of 1856 successfully settled the land with the actual owners of the soil and reduced the level of exploitation of peasants.
Reason (R): British land revenue officers believed that taluqdars were interlopers who established their hold over land through force and fraud.
�� Settlement dispossessed many taluqdars. �� Revenue pressure remained high. �� British officers distrusted taluqdars.
- The Summary Settlement did not reduce peasant suffering; overassessment and rigid collection continued. → British officials considered many taluqdars illegitimate intermediaries. → Therefore Assertion is false while Reason is true.
- �� Option A → Assertion itself is incorrect.
- �� Option B → Assertion is false.
- �� Option C → Reason is historically correct.
Used: Elimination
Application:
- �� Verify each statement independently.
Final Logic:
- �� False Assertion + True Reason = Option D.
"Settlement Hurt, Officers Distrusted."
10 Analyze the autonomy of the pre-British taluqdars:
1. They maintained armed retainers and built forts.
2. Some bigger taluqdars had as many as 12,000 foot-soldiers.
3. They enjoyed absolute independence and did not pay any revenue to the Nawab.
�� Taluqdars possessed military power. �� Some controlled large armed forces. �� They were not completely independent of the Nawab.
- Statement 1 is correct because taluqdars maintained armed retainers and fortified residences. → Statement 2 is correct because larger taluqdars commanded thousands of foot soldiers. → Statement 3 is incorrect because taluqdars remained linked to the Nawab's administration and paid revenue obligations. → Hence Option A is correct.
- �� Option B → Statement 3 is false.
- �� Option C → Statement 3 is false.
- �� Option D → All statements are not correct.
Used: Extreme Word Filter
Application:
- �� Watch for absolute words such as "absolute independence."
Final Logic:
- �� Taluqdars had autonomy, not complete independence.
"Forts & Foot Soldiers, Not Full Freedom."
11 Identify the incorrect analytical statement regarding the Summary Settlement.
�� British officials viewed many taluqdars as interlopers. �� Summary Settlement reduced taluqdar control. �� Revenue collection remained a major objective.
- The Summary Settlement of 1856 was based on the British belief that many taluqdars had acquired land through force and fraud rather than legitimate ownership. → Revenue officers attempted to settle directly with village-level proprietors and curtail taluqdar authority. → Option A is correct because taluqdar-controlled villages declined sharply. → Option C is correct because increasing revenue returns was an important British objective. → Option D is correct because southern Awadh taluqdars suffered particularly heavy losses. → Therefore Option B is the incorrect statement.
- �� Option A → Historically correct; taluqdar control over villages declined significantly.
- �� Option C → Revenue enhancement was a key aim of British administration.
- �� Option D → Southern Awadh experienced severe dispossession.
Used: Elimination
Application:
- �� Identify which statement contradicts the basic assumptions behind the Summary Settlement.
Final Logic:
- �� British officials questioned, rather than accepted, taluqdar claims.
"Settlement = Against Taluqdars."
12 Match the socio-economic impacts of the British administration:
| List 1 | List 2 |
|---|---|
| 1. State revenue flows | a. Declined from 67% to 38% |
| 2. Peasant revenue burden | b. Increased for the British |
| 3. Taluqdars' land control | c. Reached 30 to 70 per cent in some areas |
| 4. Extent of overassessment | d. Did not decline as expected |
�� British revenue receipts increased. �� Peasant burdens remained high. �� Taluqdar control reduced.
- State revenue flows increased for the British (1-b). → Peasant burden did not decline as expected (2-d). → Taluqdar land control fell from about 67% to 38% (3-a). → Overassessment reached 30–70% in some areas (4-c). → Hence Option C is correct.
- �� Option A → Peasant burden and overassessment are mismatched.
- �� Option B → State revenue flows are incorrectly matched.
- �� Option D → Most pairings are reversed.
Used: Option Grouping
Application:
- �� Match the most distinctive data points first.
Final Logic:
- �� 67% to 38% clearly refers to taluqdar land control.
"Revenue Up, Taluqdars Down."
13 Assertion (A): Neither taluqdars nor peasants had any reasons to be happy with the British annexation of Awadh.
Reason (R): While taluqdars lost their lands and forts, peasants were exposed to heavy overassessment and inflexible collection methods.
�� Taluqdars lost authority. �� Peasants faced revenue pressure. �� Both groups became dissatisfied.
- Annexation harmed taluqdars through land confiscation, destruction of forts and loss of status. → Peasants experienced heavy revenue demands and rigid collection practices. → These developments explain widespread resentment. → Therefore both statements are true and the Reason correctly explains the Assertion.
- �� Option B → The Reason directly explains the Assertion.
- �� Option C → Assertion is historically correct.
- �� Option D → Both statements are true.
Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application:
- �� Check whether the Reason logically accounts for the Assertion.
Final Logic:
- �� Shared suffering created common opposition.
"Land Lost + Tax Burden = Anger."
14 The disruption of ties of loyalty and patronage meant there was no longer any guarantee that in times of festivities the peasant would get the ________ that the taluqdar had earlier provided.
�� Patron-client relations weakened. �� Taluqdars often provided assistance. �� British changes disrupted social security networks.
- NCERT highlights that peasants sometimes relied on taluqdars for loans and assistance during festivals, marriages, and difficult times. → The breakdown of patronage removed this support system. → Therefore Option B is correct.
- �� Option A → Land distribution is not the point discussed.
- �� Option C → Military protection is not the specific reference.
- �� Option D → Tax exemption was not the regular support mentioned.
Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application:
- �� Focus on the idea of patronage and social support.
Final Logic:
- �� Patronage commonly involved loans and assistance.
"Patronage = Loan & Help."
15 Consider the duality of the taluqdars in the pre-British era:
1. They were seen as oppressors who exacted a variety of dues from the peasants.
2. They appeared as generous father figures who were considerate in times of need.
�� Taluqdars had a complex image. �� They could exploit peasants. �� They could also provide support.
- NCERT presents taluqdars as both exploitative and protective figures. → They collected dues and exercised authority over peasants. → At the same time, they provided loans, assistance, and social support. → Therefore both statements are correct.
- �� Option A → Ignores their paternal role.
- �� Option B → Ignores exploitative practices.
- �� Option C → Both statements are supported by NCERT.
Used: Option Grouping
Application:
- �� Recognize that historical actors can play multiple roles simultaneously.
Final Logic:
- �� NCERT explicitly describes both dimensions.
"Taluqdar = Tough Yet Helpful."
16 Identify the incorrect analytical statement regarding the rural resistance in Awadh during 1857.
�� Resistance in Awadh was prolonged. �� Peasants and taluqdars often fought together. �� Rural rebellion was widespread.
- Awadh witnessed one of the most sustained phases of the Revolt. → Dispossessed taluqdars actively participated and mobilized peasants. → Therefore Option D is incorrect because resistance was neither swift nor independent of taluqdar involvement.
- �� Option A → Historically accurate.
- �� Option B → Supported by NCERT evidence.
- �� Option C → Many taluqdars continued loyalty to the Nawab.
Used: Extreme Word Filter
Application:
- �� Words such as "swiftly" and "without" often signal incorrect statements.
Final Logic:
- �� Resistance was prolonged and collaborative.
"Awadh = Long Fight."
17 Arrange the following interconnected rural-military developments logically:
I. Widespread dispossession of taluqdars and overassessment of peasants.
II. Grievances of the rural world communicated to the sepoy lines.
III. Sepoys defy superior officers and mutiny.
IV. Peasants pour into towns to join the mutinous soldiers.
�� Rural grievances emerged first. �� These grievances reached sepoys. �� Mutiny followed. �� Peasants later joined rebels.
- Economic and social grievances developed in villages. → Sepoys maintained close links with rural society and learned of these problems. → Mutiny broke out in the army. → Subsequently peasants joined the rebel movement. → Hence Option B is the correct sequence.
- �� Option A → Mutiny cannot precede communication of grievances.
- �� Option C → Cause-and-effect order is reversed.
- �� Option D → Starts with the outcome rather than the cause.
Used: Elimination
Application:
- �� Follow the historical cause-effect chain.
Final Logic:
- �� Rural grievances preceded military rebellion.
"Village → Sepoy → Mutiny → Masses."
18 Match the sepoy-related factors with their impacts:
| List 1 | List 2 |
|---|---|
| 1. Awadh | a. Carried over into the sepoy lines |
| 2. White officers in 1840s | b. Nursery of the Bengal Army |
| 3. Peasant grievances | c. Father figures and disciplinarians |
| 4. White officers in 1820s | d. Developed a sense of superiority |
�� Awadh supplied many sepoys. �� Grievances reached military lines. �� Officer attitudes changed over time.
- Awadh was known as the nursery of the Bengal Army (1-b). → White officers of the 1840s increasingly developed racial superiority (2-d). → Peasant grievances entered sepoy lines (3-a). → Earlier officers often acted as father figures and disciplinarians (4-c). → Therefore Option C is correct.
- �� Option A → Officer roles are reversed.
- �� Option B → Multiple pairings are incorrect.
- �� Option D → Awadh and grievance pairings are wrong.
Used: Option Grouping
Application:
- �� Match the most familiar NCERT associations first.
Final Logic:
- �� Awadh = Bengal Army nursery is the key anchor.
"Awadh-Bengal Nursery."
19 Beyond the immediate spark of the greased cartridges, the sepoys harboured long-standing discontent due to low levels of pay and the difficulty of getting ________.
�� Cartridge issue was not the only cause. �� Sepoys faced service-related grievances. �� Leave restrictions caused dissatisfaction.
- NCERT notes that sepoys had longstanding grievances regarding low pay, poor service conditions and difficulty obtaining leave. → These frustrations existed before the cartridge controversy. → Hence Option A is correct.
- �� Option B → Not the specific grievance highlighted.
- �� Option C → Promotions were limited but leave is the NCERT answer.
- �� Option D → Ration shortages are not the focus here.
Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application:
- �� Recall the exact NCERT wording.
Final Logic:
- �� NCERT specifically mentions difficulty in getting leave.
"Low Pay, No Leave."
20 Assertion (A): In the 1840s, the trust between sepoys and their white officers was completely replaced by suspicion.
Reason (R): White officers started treating the sepoys as racial inferiors, riding roughshod over their sensibilities through abuse and physical violence.
�� Officer-sepoy relations deteriorated. �� Racial attitudes intensified. �� Mutual trust weakened.
- Earlier officers often maintained paternal relations with sepoys. → By the 1840s, many officers displayed racial arrogance and treated sepoys as inferiors. → Abuse, disrespect and violence damaged trust. → Thus both statements are true and the Reason correctly explains the Assertion.
- �� Option A → Both statements are historically true.
- �� Option B → Reason is also true.
- �� Option D → Reason directly explains the Assertion.
Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application:
- �� Determine whether the Reason directly causes the Assertion.
Final Logic:
- �� Racial discrimination led to distrust.
"Racial Arrogance → Lost Trust."
