CUET UG History Booster Test 3 - Administration and Society
π Answers are locked once submitted β results and explanations appear at the end.
QUESTION 1 OF 20
Assertion (A): The Rayas of Vijayanagara indicated their close links with the gods by signing all royal orders as "Shri Virupaksha".
Reason (R): This signature was usually written in the Sanskrit script to appeal to the Brahmanas.
QUESTION 2 OF 20
Match the following military and political milestones to central authority:
| List 1 | List 2 |
|---|---|
| 1. Rakshasi-Tangadi | a. 1512 |
| 2. Yavana kingdom establisher | b. 1565 |
| 3. Orissa rulers subdued | c. 1514 |
| 4. Raichur doab acquired | d. Krishnadeva Raya's title |
QUESTION 3 OF 20
Which of the following is INCORRECT regarding the amara-nayakas and military chiefs?
QUESTION 4 OF 20
Arrange these developments related to Vijayanagara's regional consolidation and threats in chronological order:
I. Defeat inflicted on the Sultan of Bijapur
II. Acquisition of Raichur doab
III. Control shifts to the Aravidu lineage
IV. Battle of Talikota
QUESTION 5 OF 20
Consider the following regarding land assignments:
1. Amara-nayakas sent tribute to the king annually.
2. Kings never transferred the amara-nayakas from one place to another, ensuring permanent hereditary land assignments.
QUESTION 6 OF 20
The amara-nayakas used some of the collected revenue for the maintenance of temples and ________ works, ensuring continuous revenue collection.
QUESTION 7 OF 20
QUESTION 8 OF 20
QUESTION 9 OF 20
Which statement is true regarding the resources mobilized from peasants and trade?
1. Revenue derived from trade contributed significantly to the prosperity of the state.
2. Ordinary peasants were exempt from any tax under the amara-nayaka system.
QUESTION 10 OF 20
Match the following regarding trade income and merchants:
| List 1 | List 2 |
|---|---|
| 1. Spices, textiles, precious stones | a. Work written in Telugu |
| 2. Portuguese | b. High-value exotic goods traded |
| 3. Amuktamalyada | c. Russian merchant in 15th century |
| 4. Afanasii Nikitin | d. Arrived on the west coast in 1498 |
QUESTION 11 OF 20
The sixteenth-century Portuguese traveller ________ described the houses of ordinary traders and the bustling markets in Vijayanagara as thatched but well built.
QUESTION 12 OF 20
Assertion (A): It is difficult to ascertain exactly who drew up the plans for buildings and possessed specialised architectural knowledge among craftspersons.
Reason (R): Rulers took all decisions about the buildings, but sources like inscriptions and travellers' accounts do not clearly detail the wages, origins, or identities of the ordinary masons, stonecutters, and sculptors.
QUESTION 13 OF 20
According to the descriptions of merchants and markets by Paes and Nuniz, which of the following is INCORRECT?
QUESTION 14 OF 20
Consider the following about the common residents and the urban core:
1. Field surveys show the entire area was dotted with numerous shrines.
2. The area was completely devoid of rainwater tanks, forcing residents to fetch water directly from the Tungabhadra river.
QUESTION 15 OF 20
Match the following deities and religious traditions patronized by the empire:
| List 1 | List 2 |
|---|---|
| 1. Pampadevi | a. Form of Vishnu generally worshipped in Maharashtra |
| 2. Virupaksha | b. Found among the hills of the pre-Vijayanagara period |
| 3. Vitthala | c. Local mother goddess |
| 4. Jaina temples | d. Guardian deity recognized as a form of Shiva |
QUESTION 16 OF 20
Assertion (A): Royal portrait sculpture was displayed in temples during the Vijayanagara period.
Reason (R): The king's visits to temples were treated as important state occasions accompanied by important nayakas to legitimize their authority.
QUESTION 17 OF 20
Which of the following is INCORRECT regarding Indo-Islamic influence and cultural interaction?
QUESTION 18 OF 20
While shared architecture in temples was constructed entirely of masonry, the superstructure of the ________ buildings in the royal centre was made of perishable materials.
QUESTION 19 OF 20
Consider the following statements regarding nayaka independence:
1. Following Krishnadeva Raya's death in 1529, his successors were troubled by rebellious nayakas.
2. Nayakas submitted to the authority of the kings but often rebelled and had to be subdued by military action.
QUESTION 20 OF 20
Arrange the timeline of these foreign travellers visiting the capital during its rise, peak, and weak central control, before its discovery by antiquarians:
I. Nicolo de Conti
II. Duarte Barbosa
III. Colin Mackenzie
Test Complete!
Answer Review
1 Assertion (A): The Rayas of Vijayanagara indicated their close links with the gods by signing all royal orders as "Shri Virupaksha".
Reason (R): This signature was usually written in the Sanskrit script to appeal to the Brahmanas.
Virupaksha was the guardian deity of Vijayanagara. Royal orders were associated with divine authority. The reason given is not supported by NCERT.
- Assertion is correct because Vijayanagara rulers emphasized their connection with the deity Virupaksha. Royal orders were often issued in the name of "Shri Virupaksha", reflecting divine kingship. β Reason is false because NCERT does not state that the signature was written in Sanskrit script specifically to appeal to Brahmanas. β The purpose of using "Shri Virupaksha" was to legitimize royal authority through association with the deity, not linguistic appeal. β Therefore, Assertion is true while Reason is false.
- Option A) Reason is false; therefore it cannot explain the Assertion.
- Option B) Reason itself is not supported by NCERT.
- Option C) Assertion is historically correct.
Used: Elimination
Application:
- οΏ½οΏ½ Verify Assertion and Reason separately from NCERT evidence.
Final Logic:
- οΏ½οΏ½ A is true, but R lacks historical support.
Virupaksha = Divine Signature
2 Match the following military and political milestones to central authority:
| List 1 | List 2 |
|---|---|
| 1. Rakshasi-Tangadi | a. 1512 |
| 2. Yavana kingdom establisher | b. 1565 |
| 3. Orissa rulers subdued | c. 1514 |
| 4. Raichur doab acquired | d. Krishnadeva Raya's title |
Rakshasi-Tangadi occurred in 1565. Krishnadeva Raya claimed the Yavana title. Raichur doab was acquired in 1512.
- Rakshasi-Tangadi (Talikota) took place in 1565. β "Establisher of the Yavana kingdom" was a title associated with Krishnadeva Raya. β The Orissa rulers were subdued in 1514. β Raichur doab was acquired in 1512. β Hence the correct sequence is 1-b, 2-d, 3-c, 4-a.
- Option A) Incorrectly matches Rakshasi-Tangadi and title.
- Option B) Multiple historical mismatches.
- Option D) Incorrect chronology and title pairing.
Used: Substitution
Application:
- οΏ½οΏ½ Replace each event with its known date or description.
Final Logic:
- οΏ½οΏ½ Only Option C provides all correct matches.
1512βRaichur, 1514βOrissa, 1565βTalikota
3 Which of the following is INCORRECT regarding the amara-nayakas and military chiefs?
Amara-nayakas retained part of revenue. They maintained military contingents. Revenue retention was an essential feature.
- Amara-nayakas collected taxes from their territories and retained a portion of revenue. β They used this revenue to maintain troops, horses, elephants, and local administration. β Therefore, the statement that they were forbidden from retaining revenue is incorrect. β Hence Option B is the correct answer.
- Option A) Supported by historians comparing it with the iqta system.
- Option C) Correct description of amara-nayakas.
- Option D) Maintenance of military contingents was mandatory.
Used: Odd One Out
Application:
- οΏ½οΏ½ Identify the statement contradicting the core function of amara-nayakas.
Final Logic:
- οΏ½οΏ½ Revenue retention was allowed; Option B is incorrect.
Revenue Kept = Nayaka Power
4 Arrange these developments related to Vijayanagara's regional consolidation and threats in chronological order:
I. Defeat inflicted on the Sultan of Bijapur
II. Acquisition of Raichur doab
III. Control shifts to the Aravidu lineage
IV. Battle of Talikota
Bijapur was defeated after Raichur campaigns. Talikota occurred in 1565. Aravidu control followed the crisis.
- Raichur doab was secured in 1512. β Krishnadeva Raya defeated the Sultan of Bijapur after strengthening control in the region (1520 campaign). β Battle of Talikota took place in 1565. β The Aravidu lineage gained control after the political decline that followed Talikota. β Therefore the correct order is II β I β IV β III. Among the given options, none exactly match this ideal chronology. However, NCERT chronology places the defeat of Bijapur after Raichur consolidation and before Talikota. The closest historically valid sequence is B, making the provided key questionable.
- Option A) Places Aravidu control before Talikota.
- Option C) Aravidu control cannot precede Talikota.
- Option D) Completely reverses chronology.
Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application:
- οΏ½οΏ½ Arrange events according to established historical timeline.
Final Logic:
- οΏ½οΏ½ Expansion occurred before Talikota; Aravidu came later.
Raichur β Bijapur β Talikota β Aravidu
5 Consider the following regarding land assignments:
1. Amara-nayakas sent tribute to the king annually.
2. Kings never transferred the amara-nayakas from one place to another, ensuring permanent hereditary land assignments.
Tribute was regularly paid. Transfers were used to maintain control. Assignments were not permanently fixed.
- Statement 1 is correct because amara-nayakas paid tribute to the king and expressed loyalty. β Statement 2 is incorrect because rulers occasionally transferred amara-nayakas to different regions to prevent excessive local autonomy. β Therefore only Statement 1 is true.
- Option A) Statement 2 is false.
- Option C) Statement 1 is true.
- Option D) Statement 1 is correct.
Used: Extreme Word Filter
Application:
- οΏ½οΏ½ The word "never" often signals an incorrect historical statement.
Final Logic:
- οΏ½οΏ½ Transfers did occur; Statement 2 is false.
Tribute Yes, Permanent No
6 The amara-nayakas used some of the collected revenue for the maintenance of temples and ________ works, ensuring continuous revenue collection.
Irrigation increased agricultural productivity. Revenue depended on cultivation. Temples and irrigation received support.
- Amara-nayakas spent part of their revenue on irrigation works such as tanks and canals. β Improved irrigation increased agricultural output and consequently tax revenue. β NCERT specifically mentions irrigation maintenance alongside temple support. β Hence Option D is correct.
- Option A) Not a stated responsibility.
- Option B) Trade promotion is not the NCERT phrase.
- Option C) Educational works are not mentioned in this context.
Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application:
- οΏ½οΏ½ Connect agricultural revenue with infrastructure support.
Final Logic:
- οΏ½οΏ½ Irrigation directly sustains cultivation and taxation.
Revenue β Water β Revenue
7
Portuguese introduced new military technology. Firearms strengthened their influence. Muskets altered military competition.
- Besides participating in trade, the Portuguese possessed superior military technology. β Their use of firearms, especially muskets, enhanced their political and military significance. β This advantage allowed them to influence regional power struggles. β Therefore Option C is correct.
- Option A) Not the primary source of influence.
- Option B) They controlled sea routes, not Central Asian land routes.
- Option D) No such NCERT evidence exists.
Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application:
- οΏ½οΏ½ Connect Portuguese influence with military innovation.
Final Logic:
- οΏ½οΏ½ Firearms gave them strategic importance.
Portuguese = Muskets
8
Arab traders initially dominated horse imports. Kudiraichettis were local horse merchants. Portuguese arrived later in 1498.
- The passage explicitly identifies Arab traders and kudiraichettis as participants in horse trade before Portuguese arrival. β Both groups were important in supplying horses essential for cavalry warfare. β Hence Option A is directly supported by the passage.
- Option B) Portuguese arrived only after 1498.
- Option C) Not mentioned in the passage.
- Option D) No connection to horse trade.
Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application:
- οΏ½οΏ½ Extract information directly from the passage.
Final Logic:
- οΏ½οΏ½ Passage clearly names Arab traders and kudiraichettis.
Arab + Kudirai = Horse Trade
9 Which statement is true regarding the resources mobilized from peasants and trade?
1. Revenue derived from trade contributed significantly to the prosperity of the state.
2. Ordinary peasants were exempt from any tax under the amara-nayaka system.
Trade generated substantial wealth. Peasants paid taxes. Statement 2 contradicts the revenue system.
- Trade in spices, textiles, horses, precious stones and luxury goods generated wealth for the state. β Peasants were a major source of tax revenue and were not exempt from taxation. β Therefore Statement 1 is true while Statement 2 is false. β Hence Option C is correct.
- Option A) Statement 2 is false.
- Option B) Statement 1 is true.
- Option D) Statement 1 is correct.
Used: Elimination
Application:
- οΏ½οΏ½ Check each statement against NCERT facts.
Final Logic:
- οΏ½οΏ½ Trade contributed wealth; peasants paid taxes.
Trade Wealth, Peasant Tax
10 Match the following regarding trade income and merchants:
| List 1 | List 2 |
|---|---|
| 1. Spices, textiles, precious stones | a. Work written in Telugu |
| 2. Portuguese | b. High-value exotic goods traded |
| 3. Amuktamalyada | c. Russian merchant in 15th century |
| 4. Afanasii Nikitin | d. Arrived on the west coast in 1498 |
Luxury goods formed major trade items. Portuguese arrived in 1498. Afanasii Nikitin was a Russian traveller.
- Spices, textiles and precious stones were major high-value trade goods. β Portuguese arrived on India's west coast in 1498. β Amuktamalyada is a Telugu work by Krishnadeva Raya. β Afanasii Nikitin was a Russian merchant-traveller of the fifteenth century. β Therefore Option A is correct.
- Option B) Incorrectly swaps merchants and texts.
- Option C) Multiple mismatches.
- Option D) Wrongly matches trade goods and Portuguese.
Used: Substitution
Application:
- οΏ½οΏ½ Match each item with its known historical identification.
Final Logic:
- οΏ½οΏ½ Only Option A provides all correct pairings.
GoodsβPortugalβTeluguβRussian
11 The sixteenth-century Portuguese traveller ________ described the houses of ordinary traders and the bustling markets in Vijayanagara as thatched but well built.
Barbosa was a Portuguese traveller. He recorded details of markets and residences. His account highlights urban prosperity.
- Duarte Barbosa, a sixteenth-century Portuguese traveller, provided detailed descriptions of Vijayanagara's markets, traders, and houses. β He observed that many houses were thatched but well built and noted the organized layout of settlements according to occupations. β His account is an important source for understanding the social and economic life of Vijayanagara. β Therefore, Option D is correct.
- Option A) Colin Mackenzie β He was a nineteenth-century surveyor and antiquarian, not a sixteenth-century traveller.
- Option B) Nicolo de Conti β Visited earlier and did not provide this specific description.
- Option C) Abdur Razzaq β Persian traveller whose observations differ from Barbosa's account.
Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application:
- οΏ½οΏ½ Link the description of markets and ordinary houses with the traveller known for such observations.
Final Logic:
- οΏ½οΏ½ The phrase "thatched but well built" is associated with Barbosa.
Barbosa = Bazaar Description
12 Assertion (A): It is difficult to ascertain exactly who drew up the plans for buildings and possessed specialised architectural knowledge among craftspersons.
Reason (R): Rulers took all decisions about the buildings, but sources like inscriptions and travellers' accounts do not clearly detail the wages, origins, or identities of the ordinary masons, stonecutters, and sculptors.
Information about builders is limited. Sources focus more on rulers than artisans. Lack of records explains the difficulty.
- Assertion is true because historians have limited information about the architects, planners, and skilled craftspersons involved in construction. β Reason is also true because inscriptions and travellers' accounts generally highlight rulers and patrons while providing little information about ordinary masons, sculptors, and stonecutters. β This lack of evidence directly explains why it is difficult to identify the individuals responsible for planning and construction. β Therefore, both A and R are true, and R correctly explains A.
- Option A) Reason actually explains the Assertion.
- Option C) Reason is historically correct.
- Option D) Assertion is also correct.
Used: Elimination
Application:
- οΏ½οΏ½ Verify both statements and determine whether a causal relationship exists.
Final Logic:
- οΏ½οΏ½ Lack of source material directly explains the difficulty of identifying planners.
Few Records = Unknown Builders
13 According to the descriptions of merchants and markets by Paes and Nuniz, which of the following is INCORRECT?
Markets sold both vegetarian and non-vegetarian items. Travellers described a wide variety of goods. Meat was openly available.
- Accounts by Paes and Nuniz describe highly diverse markets containing grains, fruits, animals, horses, and different types of meat. β Nuniz specifically noted the sale of meat such as partridges, hares, and rats. β Therefore, the claim that markets sold only vegetarian provisions and prohibited meat is incorrect. β Hence Option A is the correct answer.
- Option B) Correctly reflects Paes' description of horse markets.
- Option C) Matches Nuniz's observations regarding fruits.
- Option D) Supported by traveller accounts.
Used: Odd One Out
Application:
- οΏ½οΏ½ Identify the statement that contradicts traveller descriptions.
Final Logic:
- οΏ½οΏ½ Only Option A conflicts with recorded evidence.
Bisnaga = Variety Market
14 Consider the following about the common residents and the urban core:
1. Field surveys show the entire area was dotted with numerous shrines.
2. The area was completely devoid of rainwater tanks, forcing residents to fetch water directly from the Tungabhadra river.
Numerous shrines existed across the city. Water tanks were present. Statement 2 contradicts archaeological evidence.
- Field surveys reveal that the urban core and surrounding areas contained numerous shrines and small temples. β Archaeological evidence also shows the existence of tanks, canals, and other water-management structures. β Therefore Statement 1 is true, while Statement 2 is false. β Hence Option C is correct.
- Option A) Statement 2 is incorrect.
- Option B) Statement 1 is true.
- Option D) Statement 1 is supported by evidence.
Used: Extreme Word Filter
Application:
- οΏ½οΏ½ Words such as "completely devoid" often indicate an incorrect statement.
Final Logic:
- οΏ½οΏ½ Archaeology confirms the presence of tanks, making Statement 2 false.
Shrines + Tanks = Urban Core
15 Match the following deities and religious traditions patronized by the empire:
| List 1 | List 2 |
|---|---|
| 1. Pampadevi | a. Form of Vishnu generally worshipped in Maharashtra |
| 2. Virupaksha | b. Found among the hills of the pre-Vijayanagara period |
| 3. Vitthala | c. Local mother goddess |
| 4. Jaina temples | d. Guardian deity recognized as a form of Shiva |
Pampadevi was a local goddess. Virupaksha was identified with Shiva. Vitthala was associated with Vishnu worship.
- Pampadevi was a local mother goddess. β Virupaksha was the guardian deity and a form of Shiva. β Vitthala was a form of Vishnu especially worshipped in Maharashtra. β Jaina temples existed in the hills before the rise of Vijayanagara. β Therefore the correct matching is 1-c, 2-d, 3-a, 4-b.
- Option A) Pampadevi and Virupaksha are incorrectly matched.
- Option C) Multiple deity identifications are incorrect.
- Option D) Reverses established associations.
Used: Substitution
Application:
- οΏ½οΏ½ Match each deity with its known religious identity.
Final Logic:
- οΏ½οΏ½ Only Option B correctly matches all four entries.
PampaβMother, VirupakshaβShiva, VitthalaβVishnu
16 Assertion (A): Royal portrait sculpture was displayed in temples during the Vijayanagara period.
Reason (R): The king's visits to temples were treated as important state occasions accompanied by important nayakas to legitimize their authority.
Royal portraits appeared in temple settings. Temple visits reinforced legitimacy. Political authority and religion were interconnected.
- Vijayanagara rulers displayed royal portrait sculptures in temples as symbols of patronage and legitimacy. β Royal visits to temples were major public and political events attended by important nayakas. β These practices linked kingship with divine authority and strengthened political legitimacy. β Thus both A and R are true, and R correctly explains A.
- Option A) Reason is true.
- Option B) Both statements are historically supported.
- Option C) Assertion is also true.
Used: Elimination
Application:
- οΏ½οΏ½ Test both factual accuracy and explanatory relationship.
Final Logic:
- οΏ½οΏ½ Temple patronage legitimized royal authority.
Temple Visit = Royal Legitimacy
17 Which of the following is INCORRECT regarding Indo-Islamic influence and cultural interaction?
Islamic influences are visible in royal architecture. Arches and domes were adopted. Lotus Mahal is a key example.
- The architecture of secular buildings in the royal centre clearly shows Indo-Islamic influence. β Features such as arches, domes, and vaulted structures were adopted through interaction with contemporary Sultanates. β The Lotus Mahal is one of the most cited examples. β Therefore Option B is incorrect.
- Option A) Supported by NCERT.
- Option C) Correct example of Indo-Islamic influence.
- Option D) Matches the definition used by art historians.
Used: Odd One Out
Application:
- οΏ½οΏ½ Identify the statement that contradicts architectural evidence.
Final Logic:
- οΏ½οΏ½ Only Option B denies documented Islamic influence.
Lotus Mahal = Indo-Islamic
18 While shared architecture in temples was constructed entirely of masonry, the superstructure of the ________ buildings in the royal centre was made of perishable materials.
Temple structures were stone-built. Royal secular buildings used mixed materials. Superstructures often decayed over time.
- Temples were generally built entirely of durable stone masonry. β In contrast, many secular buildings in the royal centre had stone foundations but superstructures made of wood and other perishable materials. β As a result, much of the upper construction has not survived. β Therefore Option A is correct.
- Option B) Not the category described by NCERT.
- Option C) Military structures are not the specific contrast used.
- Option D) Sacred buildings refer mainly to temples, which were masonry structures.
Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application:
- οΏ½οΏ½ Recall the contrast between temple and royal-centre architecture.
Final Logic:
- οΏ½οΏ½ Secular buildings had perishable superstructures.
Temple = Stone, Palace = Wood
19 Consider the following statements regarding nayaka independence:
1. Following Krishnadeva Raya's death in 1529, his successors were troubled by rebellious nayakas.
2. Nayakas submitted to the authority of the kings but often rebelled and had to be subdued by military action.
Central authority weakened after 1529. Nayakas became increasingly independent. Rebellions challenged royal power.
- After Krishnadeva Raya's death, political instability increased and successors faced challenges from powerful nayakas. β Although nayakas formally accepted royal authority, they frequently rebelled and required military suppression. β Both statements accurately describe the weakening of central control. β Therefore Option D is correct.
- Option A) Statement 2 is also true.
- Option B) Statement 1 is true.
- Option C) Both statements are supported by NCERT.
Used: Option Grouping
Application:
- οΏ½οΏ½ Verify each statement separately before combining them.
Final Logic:
- οΏ½οΏ½ Both statements are historically correct.
1529 β Nayaka Revolts
20 Arrange the timeline of these foreign travellers visiting the capital during its rise, peak, and weak central control, before its discovery by antiquarians:
I. Nicolo de Conti
II. Duarte Barbosa
III. Colin Mackenzie
Nicolo de Conti visited first. Barbosa came in the early sixteenth century. Colin Mackenzie arrived much later.
- Nicolo de Conti visited Vijayanagara in the early fifteenth century. β Duarte Barbosa visited during the early sixteenth century and described the empire at its height. β Colin Mackenzie, a British surveyor and antiquarian, documented the ruins much later in the nineteenth century. β Hence the correct order is I β II β III.
- Option A) Places Barbosa before Conti.
- Option B) Mackenzie belongs much later chronologically.
- Option D) Mackenzie cannot precede Barbosa.
Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application:
- οΏ½οΏ½ Arrange travellers according to their historical periods.
Final Logic:
- οΏ½οΏ½ Conti β Barbosa β Mackenzie.
Conti β Barbosa β Mackenzie
