CUET UG History Booster Test 2 - François Bernier
📌 Answers are locked once submitted — results and explanations appear at the end.
QUESTION 1 OF 20
Bernier's works were originally written in French and published in 1670-71, but they were translated into English, Dutch, German, and ________ within the next five years.
QUESTION 2 OF 20
Bernier's presence in the Mughal Empire for twelve years (1656–1668) was largely sustained by his opportunities at the court. His role as a physician was initially to Prince Dara Shukoh, who was the eldest son of:
QUESTION 3 OF 20
Arrange the following events regarding Bernier's stay and the circulation of his work in chronological order:
1. Bernier arrived in India.
2. His works were first published in France.
3. His account had been reprinted three times in English.
QUESTION 4 OF 20
Assertion (A): Bernier spent his time in India solely as a medical practitioner and had no intellectual pursuits.
Reason (R): He was associated with Danishmand Khan as an intellectual and scientist.
QUESTION 5 OF 20
How did Bernier utilise his comparative approach when discussing the situation in India?
QUESTION 6 OF 20
What was the primary motivation behind Bernier formatting his works as letters to influential French officials and dedicating his major writing to the king?
QUESTION 7 OF 20
Bernier's representation of India using binary opposition meant that he viewed Indian society primarily as:
QUESTION 8 OF 20
Which of the following is an INCORRECT statement regarding Bernier's view of the East?
QUESTION 9 OF 20
Consider the following statements about crown ownership as observed by Bernier:
1. The emperor owned all the land and distributed it among his nobles.
2. Abu'l Fazl's official chronicles fully supported Bernier's claim that the state was the sole owner.
QUESTION 10 OF 20
QUESTION 11 OF 20
QUESTION 12 OF 20
Bernier argued that the absence of private property in land prevented the emergence of a specific class found in Western Europe. Which class was this, whose absence led to the uniform ruination of agriculture?
QUESTION 13 OF 20
Bernier viewed Indian society as sharply divided. How did he characterise this division?
QUESTION 14 OF 20
Match the social groups in Bernier's analysis of Mughal India:
| List I | List II |
|---|---|
| 1. Ruling class | a. Non-existent according to Bernier |
| 2. Masses | b. Small minority, very rich and powerful |
| 3. Middle state | c. Absent due to lack of private property |
| 4. Landlords | d. Undifferentiated and impoverished |
QUESTION 15 OF 20
Despite Bernier's description of Mughal cities as "camp towns", what historical fact contradicts his oversimplified picture of urban decline?
QUESTION 16 OF 20
Bernier believed that camp towns lacked viable social and economic foundations because:
QUESTION 17 OF 20
According to Bernier's account of the imperial karkhanas, why did artisans have little aspiration for improvement?
QUESTION 18 OF 20
Although Bernier saw a bleak economic landscape, he conceded that India absorbed vast quantities of the world's precious metals. How did he explain this?
QUESTION 19 OF 20
Bernier's accounts significantly influenced Western theorists from the 18th century onwards. How did his published works contrast with Arabic and Persian travel accounts?
QUESTION 20 OF 20
The concept of "oriental despotism" developed by Montesquieu using Bernier's account argued that:
Test Complete!
Answer Review
1 Bernier's works were originally written in French and published in 1670-71, but they were translated into English, Dutch, German, and ________ within the next five years.
�� Bernier's works became highly popular in Europe. �� They were translated into several languages. �� Italian was among the earliest translations.
Bernier's travel accounts gained immense popularity after publication in France during 1670–71. Within a few years, they were translated into English, Dutch, German, and Italian, ensuring wide circulation among European readers. Option C is correct. Spanish, Russian, and Greek are not mentioned in NCERT in this context.
- �� Option A → Spanish is not listed among the early translations.
- �� Option B → Russian was not part of the translations mentioned.
- �� Option D → Greek is not cited in NCERT for Bernier's translations.
Used: Direct Recall
Application: Recall the languages into which Bernier's works were translated.
Final Logic: Italian was one of the four major translations mentioned.
E-D-G-I = English, Dutch, German, Italian
2 Bernier's presence in the Mughal Empire for twelve years (1656–1668) was largely sustained by his opportunities at the court. His role as a physician was initially to Prince Dara Shukoh, who was the eldest son of:
�� Dara Shukoh was a Mughal prince. �� He was Shah Jahan's eldest son. �� Bernier initially served him as physician.
François Bernier first entered Mughal court circles as the physician of Dara Shukoh. Dara was the eldest son of Emperor Shah Jahan and a leading contender in the Mughal war of succession. Therefore, Option A is correct. The other emperors do not fit this familial relationship.
- �� Option B → Jahangir was Shah Jahan's father.
- �� Option C → Akbar belonged to an earlier generation.
- �� Option D → Aurangzeb was Dara's brother, not father.
Used: Direct Recall
Application: Recall the Mughal genealogy associated with Dara Shukoh.
Final Logic: Dara Shukoh was the eldest son of Shah Jahan.
Dara → Shah Jahan's Son
3 Arrange the following events regarding Bernier's stay and the circulation of his work in chronological order:
1. Bernier arrived in India.
2. His works were first published in France.
3. His account had been reprinted three times in English.
�� Bernier first travelled to India. �� His writings were later published. �� English reprints followed publication.
Bernier arrived in India in 1656. His writings were first published in France during 1670–71. Following their popularity, English editions were repeatedly reprinted. Thus, the sequence is arrival in India, publication in France, and later English reprints. Option D is correct.
- �� Option A → Places reprints before publication.
- �� Option B → Publication occurred after arrival in India.
- �� Option C → Reprints could not precede publication.
Used: Elimination
Application: Arrange events according to historical chronology.
Final Logic: Travel → Publication → Reprints.
India → France → England
4 Assertion (A): Bernier spent his time in India solely as a medical practitioner and had no intellectual pursuits.
Reason (R): He was associated with Danishmand Khan as an intellectual and scientist.
�� Bernier was more than a physician. �� He engaged in intellectual discussions. �� Danishmand Khan supported such pursuits.
The Assertion is false because Bernier was not merely a physician; he actively participated in intellectual and scientific circles. The Reason is true because he worked closely with Danishmand Khan as an intellectual and scientist. Therefore, Option B correctly evaluates both statements.
- �� Option A → The assertion is false.
- �� Option C → The reason is historically correct.
- �� Option D → Both statements are not true.
Used: Elimination
Application: Test the truth value of both statements.
Final Logic: Bernier combined medicine with intellectual pursuits.
Physician + Scientist
5 How did Bernier utilise his comparative approach when discussing the situation in India?
�� Bernier constantly compared India and Europe. �� He emphasized European progress. �� India was often portrayed negatively.
Bernier's writings frequently contrasted Mughal India with contemporary Europe. He often highlighted what he saw as India's weaknesses while emphasizing Europe's strengths. This comparative method produced a generally bleak picture of India. Therefore, Option C correctly reflects his approach.
- �� Option A → His aim was often critical, not celebratory.
- �� Option B → He was not promoting migration.
- �� Option D → He emphasized differences rather than similarities.
Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application: Identify the tone of Bernier's comparisons.
Final Logic: Europe was presented as superior, India as inferior.
Bernier: Europe Up, India Down
6 What was the primary motivation behind Bernier formatting his works as letters to influential French officials and dedicating his major writing to the king?
�� Bernier wrote for European audiences. �� His letters targeted influential readers. �� He hoped to shape opinions and policies.
Bernier addressed influential officials and intellectuals because he wanted his observations to influence political thinking in Europe. His writings were not merely descriptive but intended to guide decision-making. Therefore, Option B correctly captures the purpose behind his style and dedication.
- �� Option A → Residency was not his objective.
- �� Option C → His audience was European, not Mughal.
- �� Option D → The work was analytical, not fictional.
Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application: Identify the intended audience and purpose of his letters.
Final Logic: Bernier sought intellectual and political influence.
Letters = Influence
7 Bernier's representation of India using binary opposition meant that he viewed Indian society primarily as:
�� Bernier used East–West contrasts. �� Europe became the standard of comparison. �� India was portrayed as its opposite.
Bernier's binary opposition framework contrasted India with Europe. He frequently represented India as the reverse of European society and emphasized what he considered its deficiencies. This approach shaped later European perceptions of the East. Hence, Option A is correct.
- �� Option B → He did not treat both as equals.
- �� Option C → India was not portrayed as ideal.
- �� Option D → His analysis constantly relied on comparison.
Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application: Identify the meaning of "binary opposition."
Final Logic: India was represented as Europe's opposite.
Europe vs India
8 Which of the following is an INCORRECT statement regarding Bernier's view of the East?
�� Bernier criticized Mughal institutions. �� He emphasized European superiority. �� He did not praise Mughal cities as superior.
Bernier generally viewed Europe as superior and often criticized Mughal political and economic systems. He certainly did not claim Mughal cities were better planned than French cities. Therefore, Option D is the incorrect statement. The other options accurately reflect his writings.
- �� Option A → He ranked societies hierarchically.
- �� Option B → European superiority was a recurring theme.
- �� Option C → This phrase appears in his criticism of Mughal governance.
Used: Elimination
Application: Identify the statement that contradicts Bernier's overall viewpoint.
Final Logic: Praising Mughal urban superiority conflicts with his writings.
Bernier Rarely Praised
9 Consider the following statements about crown ownership as observed by Bernier:
1. The emperor owned all the land and distributed it among his nobles.
2. Abu'l Fazl's official chronicles fully supported Bernier's claim that the state was the sole owner.
�� Bernier believed the emperor owned all land. �� Abu'l Fazl does not fully support this claim. �� Only the first statement is correct.
Bernier argued that the emperor owned all land and distributed it among nobles. However, modern historians note that Mughal records, including Abu'l Fazl's writings, do not fully support the idea of exclusive state ownership. Thus, Statement 1 is correct while Statement 2 is incorrect. Option C is correct.
- �� Option A → Statement 2 is inaccurate.
- �� Option B → Statement 1 is correct.
- �� Option D → Statement 1 cannot be rejected.
Used: Elimination
Application: Evaluate each statement independently.
Final Logic: First true, second false.
Bernier Yes, Abu'l Fazl No
10
�� Bernier criticized Mughal land arrangements. �� He feared economic decline. �� He predicted social and urban deterioration.
The passage explicitly states that European rulers adopting the Mughal model would become "kings of deserts and solitudes, of beggars and barbarians." Bernier believed such a system would destroy prosperity and urban growth. Therefore, Option D directly reflects the passage and is correct.
- �� Option A → Bernier predicted decline, not improvement.
- �� Option B → Population growth was not expected.
- �� Option C → He believed wealth and prosperity would decrease.
Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application: Identify the exact prediction made in the passage.
Final Logic: Bernier foresaw deserts, poverty, and decline.
Mughal Model = Deserts & Beggars
11
�� Bernier predicted urban decline. �� Cities would become unhealthy. �� Prosperity would disappear under the Mughal model.
The passage explicitly states that great cities and boroughs would become "uninhabitable because of ill air" and eventually "fall to ruin." Bernier used this argument to criticize what he perceived as the Mughal land system. Therefore, Option A directly reflects the passage and is correct.
- �� Option B → The passage predicts decline, not expansion.
- �� Option C → Improving landlords were absent in Bernier's model.
- �� Option D → No such agricultural transformation is mentioned.
Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application: Match the answer directly with the passage wording.
Final Logic: The passage clearly predicts urban decay and ruin.
Ill Air = Urban Despair
12 Bernier argued that the absence of private property in land prevented the emergence of a specific class found in Western Europe. Which class was this, whose absence led to the uniform ruination of agriculture?
�� Bernier valued private property. �� He linked improvement with landlords. �� Their absence supposedly harmed agriculture.
Bernier believed that private ownership encouraged investment and agricultural development. According to him, the absence of private property prevented the emergence of "improving" landlords who could enhance productivity. Therefore, Option B is correct. The other classes were not central to his argument about agricultural decline.
- �� Option A → Peasants were not the class emphasized by Bernier.
- �� Option C → Merchants were unrelated to this specific argument.
- �� Option D → Industrial capitalists belonged to a later context.
Used: Direct Recall
Application: Recall Bernier's economic criticism of Mughal land relations.
Final Logic: Lack of improving landlords explained agricultural stagnation.
Private Property → Improving Landlords
13 Bernier viewed Indian society as sharply divided. How did he characterise this division?
�� Bernier saw social inequality. �� He emphasized elite dominance. �� He denied the existence of a middle state.
Bernier described Indian society as consisting of a poor, undifferentiated mass controlled by a small, wealthy ruling class. His interpretation emphasized extreme inequality and the absence of a substantial middle group. Hence, Option A accurately reflects his assessment of Mughal society.
- �� Option B → Bernier denied a large middle class.
- �� Option C → He emphasized inequality, not equality.
- �� Option D → This description is absent from his writings.
Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application: Identify Bernier's recurring description of social structure.
Final Logic: Rich minority versus poor masses.
Few Rich, Many Poor
14 Match the social groups in Bernier's analysis of Mughal India:
| List I | List II |
|---|---|
| 1. Ruling class | a. Non-existent according to Bernier |
| 2. Masses | b. Small minority, very rich and powerful |
| 3. Middle state | c. Absent due to lack of private property |
| 4. Landlords | d. Undifferentiated and impoverished |
�� Rulers were wealthy and powerful. �� Masses were impoverished. �� Middle state and improving landlords were absent.
Bernier viewed the ruling class as a wealthy minority (b), the masses as impoverished (d), claimed there was no middle state (a), and argued that improving landlords were absent because of the lack of private property (c). Thus, Option C correctly matches all four categories.
- �� Option A → Reverses ruling class and masses.
- �� Option B → Incorrectly assigns the middle state and landlords.
- �� Option D → Multiple pairings do not match Bernier's views.
Used: Option Grouping
Application: Match each social category with Bernier's interpretation.
Final Logic: Only Option C aligns with all four associations.
Rich–Poor–No Middle–No Landlords
15 Despite Bernier's description of Mughal cities as "camp towns", what historical fact contradicts his oversimplified picture of urban decline?
�� Bernier underestimated urban development. �� Mughal India had substantial urbanization. �� Urban population exceeded many European regions.
Modern historical research challenges Bernier's view of Mughal cities as temporary camp towns. Evidence suggests that around 15 percent of India's population lived in towns during the seventeenth century, a proportion higher than in much of Western Europe. Therefore, Option B correctly identifies the contradiction.
- �� Option A → Not discussed in NCERT.
- �� Option C → Urban settlements were widespread.
- �� Option D → Towns existed far beyond coastal regions.
Used: Elimination
Application: Identify evidence that directly challenges Bernier's conclusion.
Final Logic: Significant urbanization contradicts urban decline.
15% Town Population
16 Bernier believed that camp towns lacked viable social and economic foundations because:
�� Bernier called Mughal cities camp towns. �� He linked them to imperial patronage. �� Their fortunes depended on the court.
Bernier believed many Mughal cities existed mainly because of the emperor's camp and patronage. Once the court moved elsewhere, he expected decline. Therefore, Option D accurately reflects his interpretation of urban life in Mughal India.
- �� Option A → Natural disasters were not his main explanation.
- �� Option B → Foreign merchants were not the determining factor.
- �� Option C → Agricultural surroundings were not central to his argument.
Used: Direct Recall
Application: Recall Bernier's explanation of camp towns.
Final Logic: Imperial patronage sustained urban centres.
Camp Moves → City Declines
17 According to Bernier's account of the imperial karkhanas, why did artisans have little aspiration for improvement?
�� Bernier criticized state control. �� He believed artisans lacked incentives. �� State appropriation discouraged improvement.
Bernier argued that artisans had little motivation to innovate because the state appropriated much of the profit from their labour. This reflected his broader belief in the benefits of private property and individual incentives. Therefore, Option D best represents his viewpoint.
- �� Option A → He did not portray artisans as highly satisfied.
- �� Option B → Training was not his explanation.
- �� Option C → Travel had no connection with this argument.
Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application: Connect Bernier's economic ideas with artisan conditions.
Final Logic: Lack of incentives discouraged improvement.
No Profit → No Progress
18 Although Bernier saw a bleak economic landscape, he conceded that India absorbed vast quantities of the world's precious metals. How did he explain this?
�� Indian goods were highly demanded. �� Exports earned precious metals. �� Bernier acknowledged this economic strength.
Despite criticizing Mughal India, Bernier admitted that Indian manufactures were widely sought after in global markets. As a result, large quantities of gold and silver flowed into India through trade. Therefore, Option B correctly explains his observation.
- �� Option A → Extensive silver mining was not his explanation.
- �� Option C → Temple donations are irrelevant here.
- �� Option D → Improving landlords were considered absent.
Used: Elimination
Application: Identify the trade-based explanation given by Bernier.
Final Logic: Exports brought gold and silver into India.
Goods Out, Gold In
19 Bernier's accounts significantly influenced Western theorists from the 18th century onwards. How did his published works contrast with Arabic and Persian travel accounts?
�� Bernier's works spread rapidly. �� Printing increased influence. �� Arabic and Persian accounts circulated less widely.
Bernier's writings were printed, translated, and reprinted across Europe within a short period. In contrast, many Arabic and Persian travel accounts remained unpublished manuscripts with limited circulation. This difference explains Bernier's greater influence on European thinkers. Therefore, Option C is correct.
- �� Option A → Arabic accounts were not widely printed in Europe.
- �� Option B → Bernier's works were quickly published.
- �� Option D → Arabic accounts covered many regions and subjects.
Used: Comparison
Application: Contrast modes of circulation and influence.
Final Logic: Printing and translation amplified Bernier's impact.
Print = Power
20 The concept of "oriental despotism" developed by Montesquieu using Bernier's account argued that:
�� Montesquieu used Bernier's observations. �� Oriental despotism stressed absolute rule. �� Land ownership was linked to ruler's power.
Montesquieu developed the theory of "oriental despotism" partly from Bernier's writings. It suggested that Asian rulers exercised absolute authority and controlled land ownership, leaving subjects politically weak. Therefore, Option A correctly summarizes the concept. The other options contradict the theory's central premise.
- �� Option B → Democratic governance is the opposite of despotism.
- �� Option C → Bernier denied a powerful middle class.
- �� Option D → Shared power contradicts absolute authority.
Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application: Identify the core meaning of "despotism."
Final Logic: Absolute ruler + land control = Oriental Despotism.
Despot = Absolute Power
