CUET UG History Booster Test 2 - Background Context -

🚀

CUET UG History Booster Test 2 - Background Context

⏱️ 30 Minutes

❓ 20 Questions

📌 Answers are locked once submitted — results and explanations appear at the end.

CUET UG History Booster Test 2 - Background Context

1 / 20

QUESTION 1 OF 20

Assertion (A): The years immediately preceding the making of the Constitution were exceptionally tumultuous.
Reason (R): The British peaceful departure caused immense joy with no subsequent violence.

Answer Review

1 Assertion (A): The years immediately preceding the making of the Constitution were exceptionally tumultuous.
Reason (R): The British peaceful departure caused immense joy with no subsequent violence.

A Both A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation of A.

B Both A and R are true, but R is not the correct explanation of A.

C A is true, but R is false.

D A is false, but R is true.

💡 Short Explanation

The years before Constitution-making were marked by unrest. Partition caused violence and displacement. The Reason contradicts historical facts.

✅ Correct Answer Explanation

The Assertion is true because the years 1946–49 witnessed Partition, communal riots, refugee movements, princely state issues, and political instability. → The Reason is false because British withdrawal was not followed by peace alone. Partition resulted in widespread violence, massacres, migration, and suffering. → Therefore, A is true and R is false, making Option C correct.

❓ Why Other Options Are Incorrect

Option A → Reason is historically incorrect.
Option B → Reason is false.
Option D → Assertion is true, not false.

🎯 Strategy

Used: Elimination

Application:

�� Test the factual accuracy of both statements independently.

Final Logic:

�� Assertion is true; Reason contradicts NCERT.

🧠 Memory Trick

Constitution = Turmoil + Partition

📚 Class XII – Themes in Indian History Part III – Chapter: Framing the Constitution: The Beginning of a New Era – Topic: Background Context

2 How did the partition impact the perspective of nationalists in the Constituent Assembly regarding separate electorates?

A They fervently opposed it, fearing continued civil war and divided loyalties.

B They supported it to give minorities a strong voice.

C They believed it was necessary to please the British.

D They felt it would ensure rapid economic growth.

💡 Short Explanation

Partition reinforced fears of communal division. Separate electorates were linked to communal politics. Nationalists favored national unity.

✅ Correct Answer Explanation

Partition convinced many Assembly members that separate electorates encouraged communal identities rather than national integration. → Leaders feared that continuing such arrangements would deepen divisions and create conflicting loyalties. → Hence Option A correctly reflects the Assembly\\\'s outlook.

❓ Why Other Options Are Incorrect

Option B → Most nationalists opposed separate electorates after Partition.
Option C → British approval was not the reason.
Option D → Separate electorates were a political, not economic, issue.

🎯 Strategy

Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching

Application:

�� Connect Partition experiences with constitutional debates.

Final Logic:

�� Partition strengthened opposition to separate electorates.

🧠 Memory Trick

Partition → No Separate Electorates

📚 Class XII – Themes in Indian History Part III – Chapter: Framing the Constitution: The Beginning of a New Era – Topic: Minority Rights Debate

3 The Quit India struggle of 1942 was perhaps the most widespread popular movement against the British Raj, followed by an upsurge of popular sympathy for Subhas Chandra Bose's bid to win freedom through _________.

A constitutional reforms

B peaceful fasting

C economic boycotts

D armed struggle with foreign aid

💡 Short Explanation

Bose organized the INA. He sought foreign assistance. His strategy emphasized armed resistance.

✅ Correct Answer Explanation

Subhas Chandra Bose believed that British rule could be overthrown through military action. → He sought support from foreign powers and organized the Indian National Army (INA). → Therefore Option D correctly describes his strategy.

❓ Why Other Options Are Incorrect

Option A → Bose did not rely mainly on constitutional reforms.
Option B → Peaceful fasting was associated with Gandhi.
Option C → Economic boycotts were not Bose's primary method.

🎯 Strategy

Used: Odd One Out

Application:

�� Identify the option linked specifically with Bose and INA.

Final Logic:

�� Bose advocated armed struggle aided by foreign powers.

🧠 Memory Trick

Bose = INA + Armed Struggle

📚 Class XII – Themes in Indian History Part III – Chapter: Framing the Constitution: The Beginning of a New Era – Topic: Mass Movements

4 Arrange the following events in the correct chronological order:
1. Provincial elections held in India
2. Rising of the ratings of the Royal Indian Navy
3. The Great Calcutta Killings.

A 2, 1, 3

B 1, 2, 3

C 3, 2, 1

D 2, 3, 1

💡 Short Explanation

Provincial elections occurred first. Naval Revolt followed in early 1946. Great Calcutta Killings occurred in August 1946.

✅ Correct Answer Explanation

Provincial elections took place in 1945–46. → The Royal Indian Navy uprising occurred in February 1946. → The Great Calcutta Killings occurred in August 1946. → Hence the sequence is 1 → 2 → 3.

❓ Why Other Options Are Incorrect

Option A → Places Naval Revolt before elections.
Option C → Completely reverses chronology.
Option D → Begins with the wrong event.

🎯 Strategy

Used: Option Grouping

Application:

�� Arrange events according to dates.

Final Logic:

�� Elections → Naval Revolt → Calcutta Killings.

🧠 Memory Trick

Election → Navy → Calcutta

📚 Class XII – Themes in Indian History Part III – Chapter: Framing the Constitution: The Beginning of a New Era – Topic: Events of 1946

5 Identify the incorrect statement regarding Hindu-Muslim unity during the late 1940s.

A The Congress and Muslim League successfully arrived at a settlement for religious reconciliation.

B Popular upsurges like the Naval revolt manifested a degree of Hindu-Muslim unity.

C The Great Calcutta Killings marked the beginning of severe communal rioting.

D Partition led to massacres accompanying the transfer of populations.

💡 Short Explanation

Congress and League failed to reach lasting agreement. Communal tensions intensified. Partition followed political deadlock.

✅ Correct Answer Explanation

The statement in Option A is incorrect because Congress and the Muslim League failed to achieve a lasting settlement on communal and constitutional issues. → The remaining statements accurately reflect NCERT descriptions of unity, riots, and Partition violence.

❓ Why Other Options Are Incorrect

Option B → Correctly describes Hindu-Muslim cooperation in some popular movements.
Option C → Historically accurate.
Option D → Correctly describes Partition violence.

🎯 Strategy

Used: Elimination

Application:

�� Identify the statement inconsistent with historical outcomes.

Final Logic:

�� Congress-League reconciliation was not successfully achieved.

🧠 Memory Trick

No Settlement → Partition

📚 Class XII – Themes in Indian History Part III – Chapter: Framing the Constitution: The Beginning of a New Era – Topic: Communal Tensions

6 Match the following leaders with their views on separate electorates.

List 1	List 2
1. Govind Ballabh Pant	a. Separate electorates are a "poison".
2. Sardar Patel	b. Demanded continuation of separate electorates.
3. B. Pocker Bahadur	c. Felt separate electorates are self-destructive.
4. Begum Aizaas Rasul	d. Argued separate electorates are "suicidal" to minorities.

A 1-a, 2-b, 3-c, 4-d

B 1-c, 2-d, 3-a, 4-b

C 1-d, 2-a, 3-b, 4-c

D 1-b, 2-a, 3-d, 4-c

💡 Short Explanation

Pant opposed divided loyalties. Patel called separate electorates poisonous. Pocker Bahadur supported continuation. Begum Rasul opposed them.

✅ Correct Answer Explanation

Govind Ballabh Pant described separate electorates as \\\"suicidal\\\" for minorities. → Sardar Patel called them a \\\"poison.\\\" → B. Pocker Bahadur demanded their continuation. → Begum Aizaas Rasul argued they were self-destructive. → Therefore Option C is correct.

❓ Why Other Options Are Incorrect

Option A → Incorrectly swaps major leaders\\\' views.
Option B → Several matches are misplaced.
Option D → Does not correspond to Assembly debates.

🎯 Strategy

Used: Option Grouping

Application:

�� Match leaders with well-known constitutional statements.

Final Logic:

�� Only Option C provides all correct pairings.

🧠 Memory Trick

Pant-Suicidal, Patel-Poison

📚 Class XII – Themes in Indian History Part III – Chapter: Framing the Constitution: The Beginning of a New Era – Topic: Separate Electorates Debate

7 What best describes the migration issue faced by refugees in 1947?

A They moved smoothly via dedicated trains.

B They faced a forcible tearing away from age-old roots and many perished on the move.

C They were fully supported financially by both governments.

D They were mostly migrating to Europe for safety.

💡 Short Explanation

Partition displaced millions. Refugees lost homes and families. Many died during migration.

✅ Correct Answer Explanation

NCERT describes Partition as involving a forcible separation from ancestral homes. → Refugees faced violence, insecurity, and death while migrating. → Therefore Option B best captures the reality.

❓ Why Other Options Are Incorrect

Option A → Migration was chaotic and dangerous.
Option C → Governments struggled to provide relief.
Option D → Refugees mainly moved between India and Pakistan.

🎯 Strategy

Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching

Application:

�� Select the option reflecting NCERT\\\'s description of suffering.

Final Logic:

�� Partition migration meant displacement and loss.

🧠 Memory Trick

Partition = Roots Torn Away

📚 Class XII – Themes in Indian History Part III – Chapter: Framing the Constitution: The Beginning of a New Era – Topic: Refugee Crisis

8 Why did the issue of the refugee crisis and mass riots heavily influence the Constituent Assembly's emphasis on a strong Central government?

A Because refugees demanded a dictator.

B To tax the refugees heavily.

C The central government needed sufficient power to ensure peace, coordinate relief, and stop communal frenzy.

D The states refused to accept any refugees without British intervention.

💡 Short Explanation

Partition created administrative challenges. Relief and rehabilitation required coordination. Leaders favored a stronger Centre.

✅ Correct Answer Explanation

The Assembly believed that a powerful Central government was necessary to maintain law and order, handle refugee rehabilitation, and control communal violence. → These concerns became stronger after Partition. → Therefore Option C is correct.

❓ Why Other Options Are Incorrect

Option A → Refugees did not demand dictatorship.
Option B → Taxation was not the issue.
Option D → British intervention was not the solution being discussed.

🎯 Strategy

Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching

Application:

�� Connect post-Partition challenges with constitutional priorities.

Final Logic:

�� Strong Centre = Peace + Relief + Coordination.

🧠 Memory Trick

Partition Problems → Strong Centre

📚 Class XII – Themes in Indian History Part III – Chapter: Framing the Constitution: The Beginning of a New Era – Topic: Strong Central Government

9 The constitutional status of the princely states remained ambiguous when the British left, leading an observer to remark that some maharajas luxuriated in "wild dreams of _________".

A massive wealth

B British military support

C merging with Pakistan

D independent power in an India of many partitions

💡 Short Explanation

Some princes hoped to remain independent. Their future status was uncertain. Integration became a major challenge.

✅ Correct Answer Explanation

NCERT records that some princes imagined maintaining independent authority after British withdrawal. → This situation was described as dreams of \\\"independent power in an India of many partitions.\\\" → Hence Option D is correct.

❓ Why Other Options Are Incorrect

Option A → Wealth was not the quoted phrase.
Option B → Not mentioned in the source.
Option C → Not applicable to all princely rulers.

🎯 Strategy

Used: Substitution

Application:

�� Recall the exact NCERT phrase.

Final Logic:

�� The quotation directly matches Option D.

🧠 Memory Trick

Princes Dreamed of Independence

📚 Class XII – Themes in Indian History Part III – Chapter: Framing the Constitution: The Beginning of a New Era – Topic: Princely States

10 How did the Constituent Assembly view the challenge of integrating various groups, including princely states and minorities?

A They planned to force integration through separate electorates.

B Every individual had to be assimilated within the nation as a citizen offering loyalty to the State.

C They allowed princely states to keep their own constitutions.

D They relied on British administrators to govern these territories.

💡 Short Explanation

Nation-building was a key objective. Citizenship was placed above communal identities. Loyalty to the State was emphasized.

✅ Correct Answer Explanation

The Constituent Assembly aimed to create a unified nation-state. → Members believed that all individuals should be integrated as citizens with loyalty to the Indian State rather than separate communal or regional identities. → Therefore Option B is correct.

❓ Why Other Options Are Incorrect

Option A → Separate electorates were largely rejected.
Option C → States were integrated into the constitutional framework.
Option D → British administrators were not intended to govern independent India.

🎯 Strategy

Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching

Application:

�� Focus on the Assembly\\\'s nation-building vision.

Final Logic:

�� Citizenship and national unity were central goals.

🧠 Memory Trick

One Nation, One Citizenship

📚 Class XII – Themes in Indian History Part III – Chapter: Framing the Constitution: The Beginning of a New Era – Topic: National Integration

11 What did Somnath Lahiri mean when he stated the Assembly was "working the British plans as the British should like it to be worked out"?

A He praised the British for their excellent administrative framework.

B He believed the British would finance the new constitution.

C He argued the Assembly was constrained by British presence, their military, and economic stranglehold.

D He wanted the Constituent Assembly to be dissolved and replaced by a monarchy.

💡 Short Explanation

Lahiri was critical of British influence. He questioned the extent of real freedom. He highlighted military and economic control.

✅ Correct Answer Explanation

Somnath Lahiri, a Communist member of the Constituent Assembly, argued that despite constitutional developments, Britain continued to exert influence through its military power, economic control, and existing administrative framework. → He felt that the Assembly was functioning within limits imposed by colonial structures. → Option C correctly reflects his criticism. → Option A incorrectly interprets his statement as praise. → Option B is unrelated to his argument. → Option D was never his demand.

❓ Why Other Options Are Incorrect

Option A → Lahiri was criticizing, not praising, British influence.
Option B → Financing the Constitution was not his concern.
Option D → He did not advocate monarchy.

🎯 Strategy

Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching

Application:

�� Identify whether the statement reflects praise or criticism.

Final Logic:

�� Lahiri\\\'s remarks were clearly critical of continuing British influence.

🧠 Memory Trick

Lahiri = British \\\"Stranglehold\\\"

📚 Class XII – Themes in Indian History Part III – Chapter: Framing the Constitution: The Beginning of a New Era – Topic: Criticism of the Constituent Assembly

12 Assertion (A): N.G. Ranga argued that constitutional rights alone were insufficient for the poor and downtrodden.
Reason (R): The real minorities lacked elementary education and were exploited by merchants and moneylenders, making them unable to use civil liberties without economic props.

A A is true, but R is false.

B Both A and R are true, but R is not the correct explanation of A.

C Both A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation of A.

D A is false, but R is true.

💡 Short Explanation

Ranga focused on economic justice. Rights alone could not help the poor. Economic support was necessary.

✅ Correct Answer Explanation

N.G. Ranga argued that the poorest sections of society could not effectively use constitutional freedoms without economic and educational support. → He described the poor masses as the \\\"real minorities\\\" because they lacked resources, education, and protection from exploitation. → The Reason directly explains why constitutional rights alone were insufficient. → Therefore Option C is correct.

❓ Why Other Options Are Incorrect

Option A → The Reason is true.
Option B → The Reason directly explains the Assertion.
Option D → The Assertion is true.

🎯 Strategy

Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching

Application:

�� Check whether the Reason logically explains the Assertion.

Final Logic:

�� Economic weakness explains why legal rights alone are inadequate.

🧠 Memory Trick

Ranga: Rights + Economic Support

📚 Class XII – Themes in Indian History Part III – Chapter: Framing the Constitution: The Beginning of a New Era – Topic: Economic Justice and Minorities

13 Why could the earlier constitutional experiments (Acts of 1909, 1919, 1935) not be seen as a direct continuity to the Constituent Assembly?

A They were written entirely by Indian nationalists.

B They were enacted by the colonial government and lacked universal adult franchise.

C They established an independent sovereign republic.

D They granted the exact same rights as the 1950 Constitution.

💡 Short Explanation

Colonial Acts were imposed by British rulers. Franchise remained limited. The Constituent Assembly represented popular sovereignty.

✅ Correct Answer Explanation

The Acts of 1909, 1919, and 1935 were colonial enactments introduced by the British Parliament. → They did not establish full democracy or universal adult franchise. → The Constituent Assembly, in contrast, sought to create a sovereign democratic republic. → Therefore Option B is correct.

❓ Why Other Options Are Incorrect

Option A → These Acts were not written entirely by Indian nationalists.
Option C → They did not create an independent republic.
Option D → The rights framework of the Constitution was much broader.

🎯 Strategy

Used: Elimination

Application:

�� Eliminate options contradicting colonial realities.

Final Logic:

�� Colonial legislation and limited franchise distinguish these Acts from the Constitution.

🧠 Memory Trick

Colonial Acts ≠ People\\\'s Constitution

📚 Class XII – Themes in Indian History Part III – Chapter: Framing the Constitution: The Beginning of a New Era – Topic: Colonial Constitutional Legacy

14 The colonial government's Acts gradually enlarged Indian participation in provincial governments. By the 1935 Act, how were the elected legislatures limited?

A They only allowed women to vote.

B They had complete sovereign control over defense.

C They operated within the framework of colonial rule and were responsible to the Governor appointed by the British.

D They were completely abolished by the British Parliament.

💡 Short Explanation

Provincial autonomy expanded. Governors retained significant powers. Colonial authority remained intact.

✅ Correct Answer Explanation

The Government of India Act, 1935 increased provincial autonomy but did not grant complete self-government. → Provincial ministries functioned within the colonial framework and remained subject to Governors appointed by the British Crown. → Therefore Option C correctly describes the limitation.

❓ Why Other Options Are Incorrect

Option A → Voting rights were not restricted only to women.
Option B → Defense remained under British control.
Option D → Legislatures were not abolished.

🎯 Strategy

Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching

Application:

�� Recall the limits of provincial autonomy under colonial rule.

Final Logic:

�� Governors retained authority despite elected legislatures.

🧠 Memory Trick

1935 Act = Autonomy but Governor Control

📚 Class XII – Themes in Indian History Part III – Chapter: Framing the Constitution: The Beginning of a New Era – Topic: Government of India Act 1935

15 Jaipal Singh argued that tribals were not a numerical minority but required protection. What specific measure did he advocate instead of separate electorates?

A Reservation of seats in the legislature

B Creation of a separate tribal nation

C Complete assimilation without any reservations

D Direct funding from the British Crown

💡 Short Explanation

Jaipal Singh represented tribal interests. He opposed separate electorates. He supported reserved representation.

✅ Correct Answer Explanation

Jaipal Singh emphasized that tribal communities required safeguards within the democratic framework. → Instead of separate electorates, he supported reservation of seats in legislatures to ensure representation while preserving national unity. → Therefore Option A is correct.

❓ Why Other Options Are Incorrect

Option B → He did not demand a separate tribal nation.
Option C → He sought constitutional safeguards.
Option D → British funding was irrelevant.

🎯 Strategy

Used: Elimination

Application:

�� Identify the constitutional safeguard actually proposed.

Final Logic:

�� Reservation balanced protection and integration.

🧠 Memory Trick

Jaipal Singh = Tribal Reservation

📚 Class XII – Themes in Indian History Part III – Chapter: Framing the Constitution: The Beginning of a New Era – Topic: Tribal Representation

16 How did members like J. Nagappa view the social disabilities of the Depressed Castes?

A As a purely economic issue caused by lack of industries.

B As a result of their small population size (under 5%).

C As an acceptable norm in rural society.

D As caused by systemic marginalisation, social norms, and moral values of caste society, not numerical insignificance.

💡 Short Explanation

Caste discrimination was the core issue. Social exclusion limited opportunities. Population size was not the main concern.

✅ Correct Answer Explanation

J. Nagappa argued that the disadvantages faced by Depressed Castes resulted from long-standing social discrimination embedded in caste practices. → Their problems arose from systemic exclusion rather than numerical weakness. → Hence Option D is correct.

❓ Why Other Options Are Incorrect

Option A → The issue was broader than economics.
Option B → Numerical size was not the main cause.
Option C → He criticized such social practices.

🎯 Strategy

Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching

Application:

�� Focus on the social justice arguments in the Assembly.

Final Logic:

�� Caste-based marginalisation explains their condition.

🧠 Memory Trick

Nagappa = Caste, Not Numbers

📚 Class XII – Themes in Indian History Part III – Chapter: Framing the Constitution: The Beginning of a New Era – Topic: Depressed Castes and Social Justice

17 Govind Ballabh Pant argued that "For the success of democracy one must train himself in the art of self-discipline." What did he imply regarding national unity?

A Citizens must form private militias.

B Minorities should live in isolated communities.

C All loyalties must exclusively be centered round the State, avoiding rival or divided loyalties.

D The state should enforce a single religion.

💡 Short Explanation

Pant emphasized national integration. Democracy required civic discipline. Divided loyalties weakened unity.

✅ Correct Answer Explanation

Pant believed that a democratic nation-state could function effectively only when citizens placed their loyalty primarily in the State rather than communal or sectional identities. → This was part of the broader effort to create a unified India after Partition. → Therefore Option C is correct.

❓ Why Other Options Are Incorrect

Option A → Opposite to democratic discipline.
Option B → Encourages division, not unity.
Option D → Pant did not advocate a religious state.

🎯 Strategy

Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching

Application:

�� Connect democracy with national unity.

Final Logic:

�� Pant linked democracy with undivided loyalty to the nation.

🧠 Memory Trick

Pant = One Loyalty, One Nation

📚 Class XII – Themes in Indian History Part III – Chapter: Framing the Constitution: The Beginning of a New Era – Topic: National Unity

18 Jawaharlal Nehru's "Objectives Resolution" envisioned fusing which two ideological concepts for India's democracy?

A Imperialism and Capitalism

B Liberal ideas of democracy with the socialist idea of economic justice

C Theocracy and Monarchy

D Federalism and Colonialism

💡 Short Explanation

Nehru supported democracy. He also emphasized social justice. The Resolution combined both ideals.

✅ Correct Answer Explanation

The Objectives Resolution sought to establish political democracy while also pursuing social and economic justice. → It reflected a fusion of liberal democratic values and concern for economic equality. → Therefore Option B is correct.

❓ Why Other Options Are Incorrect

Option A → Contrary to anti-colonial nationalism.
Option C → Not part of the Resolution.
Option D → Colonialism was rejected.

🎯 Strategy

Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching

Application:

�� Recall Nehru\\\'s constitutional vision.

Final Logic:

�� Democracy + Economic Justice = Objectives Resolution.

🧠 Memory Trick

Nehru = Democracy + Justice

📚 Class XII – Themes in Indian History Part III – Chapter: Framing the Constitution: The Beginning of a New Era – Topic: Objectives Resolution

📄 Passage

"One of the topics most vigorously debated in the Constituent Assembly was the respective rights of the Central Government and the states. Among those arguing for a strong Centre was Jawaharlal Nehru. As he put it in a letter to the President of the Constituent Assembly, 'Now that partition is a settled fact... it would be injurious to the interests of the country to provide for a weak central authority...'. The Draft Constitution provided for three lists of subjects: Union, State, and Concurrent."

Why did Nehru argue for a strong central authority in the context of the Assembly's setup process?

A To suppress regional languages.

B To maintain control over the princely states\\\' wealth.

C To ensure the British retained no influence.

D Because partition made a weak centre incapable of ensuring peace and coordinating matters of common concern.

💡 Short Explanation

Partition created instability. National integration required coordination. Nehru favored a strong Centre.

✅ Correct Answer Explanation

Nehru believed that after Partition, India needed a strong Central government capable of maintaining peace, ensuring national unity, coordinating administration, and addressing common national concerns. → The passage itself links his argument to the changed circumstances after Partition. → Therefore Option D is correct.

❓ Why Other Options Are Incorrect

Option A → Language suppression was not the objective.
Option B → Wealth control was not the central issue.
Option C → His argument extended beyond British influence.

🎯 Strategy

Used: Substitution

Application:

�� Use information directly provided in the passage.

Final Logic:

�� Partition strengthened the case for a strong Centre.

🧠 Memory Trick

Partition → Strong Centre

📚 Class XII – Themes in Indian History Part III – Chapter: Framing the Constitution: The Beginning of a New Era – Topic: Centre-State Relations

📄 Passage

"One of the topics most vigorously debated in the Constituent Assembly was the respective rights of the Central Government and the states. Among those arguing for a strong Centre was Jawaharlal Nehru. As he put it in a letter to the President of the Constituent Assembly, 'Now that partition is a settled fact... it would be injurious to the interests of the country to provide for a weak central authority.'. The Draft Constitution provided for three lists of subjects: Union, State, and Concurrent."

Under the Draft Constitution's structure, which level of government had control over minerals and key industries?

A The Union (Centre)

B The State

C Both Union and State equally

D The Local Panchayats

💡 Short Explanation

Strategic resources were placed under Union control. National economic planning required central authority. Minerals and key industries fell in the Union List.

✅ Correct Answer Explanation

The Draft Constitution assigned subjects of national importance, including major industries, mineral resources, defence, foreign affairs, and communications, to the Union Government. → This reflected the Assembly\\\'s preference for a strong Centre. → Therefore Option A is correct.

❓ Why Other Options Are Incorrect

Option B → States did not have exclusive control over key minerals and strategic industries.
Option C → These subjects were not equally controlled by both levels.
Option D → Panchayats had no such authority.

🎯 Strategy

Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching

Application:

�� Connect the strong Centre debate with allocation of important subjects.

Final Logic:

�� Strategic economic sectors were placed under Union authority.

🧠 Memory Trick

Minerals = Union List

📚 Class XII – Themes in Indian History Part III – Chapter: Framing the Constitution: The Beginning of a New Era – Topic: Union, State and Concurrent Lists

CUET UG History Booster Test 2 - Background Context

Test Complete!

Answer Review