CUET UG Economics Booster Test 3 - Multiplier and Advanced Concepts
π Answers are locked once submitted β results and explanations appear at the end.
QUESTION 1 OF 20
Which of the following statements are correct regarding the multiplier concept?
Statements:
1. It is the ratio of the increment in equilibrium output to the initial increment in autonomous expenditure.
2. It explains how a change in autonomous investment causes an exactly equal change in total income.
3. Its magnitude depends directly on the value of the Marginal Propensity to Consume (MPC).
QUESTION 2 OF 20
Assertion (A): The working process of the multiplier assumes that producers continuously increase output to clear the excess demand in each round.
Reason (R): Consumers spend a part of their additional income on consumption items, which actively creates further excess demand in the subsequent rounds.
QUESTION 3 OF 20
Arrange the following multiplier rounds in chronological order of their impact on Aggregate Demand, given an initial autonomous increment of 10 and an MPC of 0.8.
Statements:
1. (0.8)^3, 10
2. 10
3. (0.8)^2, 10
4. (0.8)Γ10
QUESTION 4 OF 20
The mathematical convergence of the multiplier process relies heavily on the fact that:
QUESTION 5 OF 20
Match the value of the Marginal Propensity to Consume (MPC) with the corresponding investment multiplier (k).
| List I | List II |
|---|---|
| 1. MPC = 0.5 | a. k = 4 |
| 2. MPC = 0.8 | b. k = 2 |
| 3. MPC = 0 | c. k = 1 |
| 4. MPC = 0.75 | d. k = 5 |
QUESTION 6 OF 20
Since the absolute size of the multiplier depends on the value of c (MPC), as c becomes ________ the multiplier logically ________.
QUESTION 7 OF 20
In a given economy, if the consumption function is C=100+0.8Yand autonomous investment (I) suddenly changes from 10 to 20, the initial increase in autonomous expenditure is:
QUESTION 8 OF 20
Based on the parameters of the previous question (where initial autonomous investment increases by 10 and C=100+0.8Y), what will be the total effect on the equilibrium income level?
QUESTION 9 OF 20
Assertion (A): An increase in autonomous investment shifts the AD curve vertically upwards by the exact amount of the investment increase.
Reason (R): Autonomous investment depends directly and proportionately on the level of income.
QUESTION 10 OF 20
Why does aggregate output increase by an amount larger than the size of the initial increment in autonomous expenditure?
QUESTION 11 OF 20
The paradox of thrift critically illustrates that if the ________ of the economy increases, the total value of savings will practically not increase.
QUESTION 12 OF 20
Which of the following statements accurately describes the outcome on savings when people suddenly become more thrifty?
QUESTION 13 OF 20
An autonomous reduction in aggregate consumption expenditure, triggered by a sudden drop in MPC from 0.8 to 0.5 at an initial income of 250, results in an initial excess supply equal to:
QUESTION 14 OF 20
Arrange the logical sequence of macroeconomic events resulting from a decrease in the Marginal Propensity to Consume (MPC).
Statements:
1. The AD line swings downward.
2. Equilibrium income ultimately falls.
3. Excess supply emerges in the goods market.
4. Consumers rapidly become more thrifty due to external factors.
QUESTION 15 OF 20
Assertion (A): The equilibrium attained at the point of equality of Y and AD by itself does not signify full employment of resources.
Reason (R): Equilibrium only strictly means that the level of income will not change if left to itself, even if there is unemployment.
QUESTION 16 OF 20
Match the macroeconomic scenario strictly with the condition of factor utilisation.
| List I | List II |
|---|---|
| 1. Output > Full employment output | a. Deficient demand |
| 2. Output < Full employment output | b. Diminishing returns do not strictly apply |
| 3. Output = Full employment output | c. All factors fully employed |
| 4. Unused resources are present | d. Excess demand |
QUESTION 17 OF 20
If the equilibrium output is structurally less than the full employment level of output due to deficient demand, what is the anticipated long-run consequence according to the text?
QUESTION 18 OF 20
Excess demand occurs when the Aggregate Demand is precisely ________ the level of output produced at the full employment level.
QUESTION 19 OF 20
QUESTION 20 OF 20
Test Complete!
Answer Review
1 Which of the following statements are correct regarding the multiplier concept?
Statements:
1. It is the ratio of the increment in equilibrium output to the initial increment in autonomous expenditure.
2. It explains how a change in autonomous investment causes an exactly equal change in total income.
3. Its magnitude depends directly on the value of the Marginal Propensity to Consume (MPC).
The investment multiplier measures the change in equilibrium income resulting from a change in autonomous expenditure. Its size depends on the Marginal Propensity to Consume (MPC). The multiplier causes a multiple, not an equal, change in income.
Evaluate each statement: Statement 1: Correct. The investment multiplier is defined as the ratio of the change in equilibrium income to the initial change in autonomous expenditure: k=ΞY/ΞI Statement 2: Incorrect. A change in autonomous investment does not produce an exactly equal change in total income. Instead, it generates a multiple change depending on the value of the multiplier. Statement 3: Correct. The multiplier depends directly on the Marginal Propensity to Consume (MPC) and is given by: k=1/1-c where c = MPC. A higher MPC results in a larger multiplier. Therefore, Statements 1 and 3 are correct. Hence, Option C is the correct answer.
- Option A: Incorrect because Statement 3 is also correct.
- Option B: Incorrect because Statement 2 is false.
- Option D: Incorrect because Statement 2 is false.
Statement Verification
Application:
- Evaluate each statement using the definition and formula of the investment multiplier.
Final Logic:
- The multiplier is the ratio of the change in income to autonomous expenditure and depends on the MPC. It produces a multiple, not an equal, increase in income. Therefore, Option C is correct.
"Multiplier = Multiple Increase, Not Equal Increase."
2 Assertion (A): The working process of the multiplier assumes that producers continuously increase output to clear the excess demand in each round.
Reason (R): Consumers spend a part of their additional income on consumption items, which actively creates further excess demand in the subsequent rounds.
Every increase in income generates additional consumption expenditure, creating fresh excess demand. Producers respond by increasing output, giving rise to successive rounds of the multiplier.
Initially: Autonomous investment increases. Firms expand production. Income rises. Since households consume a fraction (MPC) of this additional income: Consumption increases. Fresh Aggregate Demand is created. Producers again increase production. Thus, Assertion is true. Reason is true. Reason correctly explains the Assertion. Hence, Option A is correct.
- Option B) Incorrect because the Reason directly explains the Assertion.
- Option C) Incorrect because the Reason is true.
- Option D) Incorrect because both statements are true.
Used
- AssertionβReason
Application: Link induced consumption with successive rounds of production.
Final Logic: Additional consumption creates further excess demand, explaining why producers continue increasing output.
"Income β Spending β Demand β Production."
3 Arrange the following multiplier rounds in chronological order of their impact on Aggregate Demand, given an initial autonomous increment of 10 and an MPC of 0.8.
Statements:
1. (0.8)^3, 10
2. 10
3. (0.8)^2, 10
4. (0.8)Γ10
The multiplier generates a geometric progression where each successive round equals MPC Γ previous round.
The sequence is: Round 1 10 Round 2 0.8Γ10 Round 3 (0.8)^2, 10 Round 4 (0.8)^3, 10 Thus, the correct chronological order is: 2 β 4 β 3 β 1 Hence, Option D is correct.
- Option A) Incorrect because it starts with the final round.
- Option B) Incorrect because it reverses the sequence.
- Option C) Incorrect because the second and third rounds are interchanged.
Used
- Arrange in Order
Application: Follow the geometric progression generated by the multiplier.
Final Logic: Initial expenditure is followed by successively smaller MPC multiples.
"10 β 8 β 6.4 β 5.12..."
4 The mathematical convergence of the multiplier process relies heavily on the fact that:
The multiplier process converges because households spend only a fraction (MPC) of each additional unit of income, making every successive round smaller than the previous one.
The multiplier generates an infinite geometric series: ΞI+cΞI+c^2ΞI+c^3ΞI+β― This series converges only when: 0<c<1 Since MPC is less than 1, each successive round is smaller, allowing the series to approach a finite value. Hence, Option B is correct.
- Option A) Incorrect because consumers never save their entire income during the multiplier process.
- Option C) Incorrect because autonomous investment remains constant after the initial increase.
- Option D) Incorrect because MPC greater than 1 is not economically possible and would make the series diverge.
Used
- Concept Application
Application: Recall the condition for convergence of an infinite geometric progression.
Final Logic: Since 0<MPC<1, the multiplier process converges. Therefore, Option B is correct.
"MPC Less Than One β Multiplier Gets Done."
5 Match the value of the Marginal Propensity to Consume (MPC) with the corresponding investment multiplier (k).
| List I | List II |
|---|---|
| 1. MPC = 0.5 | a. k = 4 |
| 2. MPC = 0.8 | b. k = 2 |
| 3. MPC = 0 | c. k = 1 |
| 4. MPC = 0.75 | d. k = 5 |
Use the multiplier formula: k=1/1-c to calculate each multiplier.
Calculations: MPC = 0.5 k=1/1-0.5=2 β b MPC = 0.8 k=1/0.2=5 β d MPC = 0 k=1/1=1 β c MPC = 0.75 k=1/0.25=4 β a Therefore, 1-b, 2-d, 3-c, 4-a Hence, Option A is correct.
- Option B) Incorrect because the multipliers are mismatched.
- Option C) Incorrect because MPC = 0.5 does not produce k = 1.
- Option D) Incorrect because multiple pairings are incorrect.
Used
- Formula Application
Application: Compute k=1/1-c for each MPC.
Final Logic: Only Option A correctly matches every value.
"Higher MPC β Higher Multiplier."
6 Since the absolute size of the multiplier depends on the value of c (MPC), as c becomes ________ the multiplier logically ________.
The multiplier is directly related to MPC.
The multiplier formula is: k=1/1-c As MPC (c) increases: The denominator (1, c)becomes smaller. The multiplier becomes larger. Example: MPC = 0.5 β k = 2 MPC = 0.8 β k = 5 MPC = 0.9 β k = 10 Thus, a larger MPC always produces a larger multiplier. Hence, Option D is correct.
- Option A) Incorrect because a smaller MPC reduces the multiplier.
- Option B) Incorrect because the relationship is the opposite.
- Option C) Incorrect because MPC cannot be negative in this context, and an infinite multiplier is not implied.
Used
- Concept Application
Application: Apply the multiplier formula to understand the relationship between MPC and the multiplier.
Final Logic: Higher MPC β Larger multiplier. Therefore, Option D is correct.
"Higher MPC, Higher Multiplier."
7 In a given economy, if the consumption function is C=100+0.8Yand autonomous investment (I) suddenly changes from 10 to 20, the initial increase in autonomous expenditure is:
The initial increase in autonomous expenditure is simply the change in autonomous investment.
Initially, I=10 Later, I=20 Therefore, ΞI=20-10=10 Since autonomous consumption remains unchanged, the increase in autonomous expenditure is βΉ10. Hence, Option C is correct.
- Option A) Incorrect because βΉ100 is the autonomous consumption component, not the increase in investment.
- Option B) Incorrect because βΉ50 is unrelated to the change in investment.
- Option D) Incorrect because βΉ20 is the new investment level, not the increase.
Used
- Numerical Application
Application: Calculate the difference between the new and old autonomous investment.
Final Logic: Initial increase = New Investment β Old Investment = βΉ10. Therefore, Option C is correct.
"Change Means New Minus Old."
8 Based on the parameters of the previous question (where initial autonomous investment increases by 10 and C=100+0.8Y), what will be the total effect on the equilibrium income level?
The total increase in equilibrium income equals the multiplier multiplied by the increase in autonomous investment.
Given: MPC = 0.8 Initial increase in investment = βΉ10 Multiplier: k=1/1-0.8=5 Therefore, ΞY=kΓΞI=5Γ10=50 Hence, Option D is correct.
- Option A) Incorrect because it represents only the initial investment increase.
- Option B) Incorrect because it underestimates the multiplier effect.
- Option C) Incorrect because the multiplier is 5, not 4.
Used
- Formula Application
Application:
- Use
- k=1/1-c
- then calculate
- ΞY=kΓΞI.
Final Logic: The total increase in equilibrium income is βΉ50. Therefore, Option D is correct.
"Multiplier Γ Investment = Income Increase."
9 Assertion (A): An increase in autonomous investment shifts the AD curve vertically upwards by the exact amount of the investment increase.
Reason (R): Autonomous investment depends directly and proportionately on the level of income.
Autonomous investment causes a parallel upward shift in the Aggregate Demand curve because it is independent of income.
The Assertion is True because an increase in autonomous investment raises Aggregate Demand by the same amount at every income level, shifting the AD curve vertically upward. The Reason is False because autonomous investment is exogenous and does not depend on the current level of income. It is represented as: I=I Hence, Option B is correct.
- Option A) Incorrect because the Reason is false.
- Option C) Incorrect because the Assertion is true.
- Option D) Incorrect because the Assertion is true.
Used
- AssertionβReason Analysis
Application: Distinguish between autonomous (income-independent) and induced (income-dependent) variables.
Final Logic: Autonomous investment shifts the AD curve upward but is not determined by income. Therefore, Option B is correct.
"Autonomous = Independent of Income."
10 Why does aggregate output increase by an amount larger than the size of the initial increment in autonomous expenditure?
The multiplier process works because each increase in income induces further consumption, creating additional rounds of spending and output.
An increase in autonomous expenditure first raises income. Households then spend a fraction (MPC) of this additional income. This creates: additional Aggregate Demand, further increases in production, more income, and repeated rounds of induced consumption. Consequently, the final increase in equilibrium output exceeds the initial increase in autonomous expenditure. Hence, Option A is correct.
- Option B) Incorrect because the multiplier mechanism is driven by Aggregate Demand, not by a rightward shift in Aggregate Supply.
- Option C) Incorrect because a decline in MPS alone is not the direct explanation; the key mechanism is induced consumption.
- Option D) Incorrect because the question refers generally to autonomous expenditure, not specifically to tax changes.
Used
- Concept Application
Application: Recall the working mechanism of the investment multiplier.
Final Logic: Successive rounds of induced consumption generate a multiplied increase in output. Therefore, Option A is correct.
"Income β Consumption β Income Again."
11 The paradox of thrift critically illustrates that if the ________ of the economy increases, the total value of savings will practically not increase.
The Paradox of Thrift states that when everyone attempts to save more (higher MPS), Aggregate Demand falls, reducing National Income. Consequently, total savings may remain unchanged or even decrease.
When households increase their Marginal Propensity to Save (MPS): Consumption expenditure decreases. Aggregate Demand falls. Firms reduce production. National Income declines. The fall in income offsets the increase in the saving ratio. Therefore, despite a higher MPS, total savings do not increase significantly. Hence, Option B is correct.
- Option A) Incorrect because a higher MPC generally increases Aggregate Demand.
- Option C) Incorrect because autonomous investment is unrelated to the paradox itself.
- Option D) Incorrect because Aggregate Demand decreases rather than increases.
Used
- Concept Identification
Application: Recall the central idea of the Keynesian Paradox of Thrift.
Final Logic: Higher MPS β Lower Income β Savings remain unchanged or fall. Therefore, Option B is correct.
"More Saving by All = Same Saving Overall."
12 Which of the following statements accurately describes the outcome on savings when people suddenly become more thrifty?
Higher thrift reduces consumption, which lowers Aggregate Demand and equilibrium income. This prevents total savings from increasing.
When everyone saves a larger proportion of income: Consumption decreases. Aggregate Demand shifts downward. Firms reduce output. Income declines through the multiplier process. The fall in income offsets the higher saving ratio. Thus, aggregate savings remain unchanged or decline. Hence, Option C is correct.
- Option A) Incorrect because excess supply causes firms to reduce production.
- Option B) Incorrect because equilibrium income falls rather than rises.
- Option D) Incorrect because the AD curve swings downward, not upward.
Used
- Concept Application
Application: Apply the multiplier process after an increase in thrift.
Final Logic: Lower consumption reduces income, preventing total savings from increasing. Therefore, Option C is correct.
"Higher Thrift β Lower Income β Same Savings."
13 An autonomous reduction in aggregate consumption expenditure, triggered by a sudden drop in MPC from 0.8 to 0.5 at an initial income of 250, results in an initial excess supply equal to:
The fall in MPC reduces planned consumption by: ΞC=ΞMPCΓY creating an initial excess supply.
Initial MPC = 0.8 New MPC = 0.5 Difference: 0.8-0.5=0.3 Initial income: Y=250 Reduction in consumption: 0.3Γ250=75 Thus, the initial excess supply equals βΉ75. Hence, Option C is correct.
- Option A) Incorrect because βΉ250 is total income, not excess supply.
- Option B) Incorrect because autonomous investment does not determine this change.
- Option D) Incorrect because the multiplier is unrelated to the initial excess supply calculation.
Used
- Numerical Application
Application: Calculate the reduction in consumption using the change in MPC.
Final Logic:
- (0.8-0.5)Γ250=75
- Therefore, Option C is correct.
"Consumption Loss = Change in MPC Γ Income."
14 Arrange the logical sequence of macroeconomic events resulting from a decrease in the Marginal Propensity to Consume (MPC).
Statements:
1. The AD line swings downward.
2. Equilibrium income ultimately falls.
3. Excess supply emerges in the goods market.
4. Consumers rapidly become more thrifty due to external factors.
When people become more thrifty, MPC decreases. This causes the Aggregate Demand (AD) curve to swing downward, creating excess supply and ultimately reducing equilibrium income.
The correct sequence is: Step 1: Consumers become more thrifty, reducing MPC. Step 2: The AD curve swings downward because its slope decreases. Step 3: Planned Aggregate Demand becomes less than planned output, creating excess supply. Step 4: Firms cut production, causing equilibrium income to fall. Thus, the correct order is: 4 β 1 β 3 β 2 Hence, Option B is correct.
- Option A) Incorrect because thrift must occur before the AD curve changes.
- Option C) Incorrect because excess supply arises after the AD curve swings downward.
- Option D) Incorrect because consumers become more thrifty before the AD curve changes.
Used
- Arrange in Order
Application: Follow the Keynesian chain from behavioural change to equilibrium adjustment.
Final Logic: Thrift β Lower MPC β AD swings downward β Excess supply β Lower income.
"Thrift β AD Falls β Excess Supply β Income Falls."
15 Assertion (A): The equilibrium attained at the point of equality of Y and AD by itself does not signify full employment of resources.
Reason (R): Equilibrium only strictly means that the level of income will not change if left to itself, even if there is unemployment.
Keynesian equilibrium means output is stable, but it may occur below the full-employment level if Aggregate Demand is insufficient.
The Assertion is True because equilibrium simply means: Y=AD It does not guarantee full employment. The Reason is also True because Keynesian equilibrium can exist with unemployment if Aggregate Demand is too low. The Reason directly explains why equilibrium does not necessarily imply full employment. Hence, Option A is correct.
- Option B) Incorrect because the Reason directly explains the Assertion.
- Option C) Incorrect because the Reason is true.
- Option D) Incorrect because both statements are correct.
Used
- AssertionβReason Analysis
Application: Distinguish equilibrium from full employment.
Final Logic: Stable income does not necessarily mean full employment. Therefore, Option A is correct.
"Equilibrium = Stable Output, Not Full Employment."
16 Match the macroeconomic scenario strictly with the condition of factor utilisation.
| List I | List II |
|---|---|
| 1. Output > Full employment output | a. Deficient demand |
| 2. Output < Full employment output | b. Diminishing returns do not strictly apply |
| 3. Output = Full employment output | c. All factors fully employed |
| 4. Unused resources are present | d. Excess demand |
Different output levels correspond to different macroeconomic situations regarding demand and resource utilisation.
The correct matching is: 1. Output > Full employment output β d. Excess demand 2. Output < Full employment output β a. Deficient demand 3. Output = Full employment output β c. All factors fully employed 4. Unused resources are present β b. Diminishing returns do not strictly apply Thus, the correct sequence is: 1-d, 2-a, 3-c, 4-b Hence, Option D is correct.
- Option A) Incorrect because output above full employment corresponds to excess demand, not deficient demand.
- Option B) Incorrect because output below full employment indicates deficient demand.
- Option C) Incorrect because the first two pairings are incorrect.
Used
- Concept Matching
Application: Match each output situation with its appropriate macroeconomic condition.
Final Logic: Only Option D correctly matches all four scenarios.
"Below Full Employment β Deficient Demand; Above Full Employment β Excess Demand."
17 If the equilibrium output is structurally less than the full employment level of output due to deficient demand, what is the anticipated long-run consequence according to the text?
Deficient demand means Aggregate Demand is insufficient to achieve full employment. In the long run, persistent deficient demand creates downward pressure on prices.
When equilibrium output remains below the full-employment level: Aggregate Demand is insufficient. Firms cannot sell all their output. Excess capacity and unemployment persist. Competitive pressure eventually causes prices to fall in the long run. Thus, deficient demand is associated with a decline in the general price level over time. Hence, Option A is correct.
- Option B) Incorrect because rising prices are associated with excess demand, not deficient demand.
- Option C) Incorrect because deficient demand does not permanently increase the Marginal Propensity to Save.
- Option D) Incorrect because deficient demand does not by itself shift the Aggregate Supply curve upward.
Used
- Concept Application
Application: Relate deficient demand to long-run macroeconomic outcomes.
Final Logic: Persistent deficient demand creates downward pressure on prices. Therefore, Option A is correct.
"Low Demand β Low Prices."
18 Excess demand occurs when the Aggregate Demand is precisely ________ the level of output produced at the full employment level.
Excess demand arises when Aggregate Demand exceeds the economy's full-employment output.
At the full-employment level: The economy is already utilizing all available productive resources. If Aggregate Demand becomes greater than this level of output, firms cannot sustainably increase production. This results in excess demand and inflationary pressure. Hence, Option D is correct.
- Option A) Incorrect because equality indicates equilibrium, not excess demand.
- Option B) Incorrect because lower demand results in deficient demand.
- Option C) Incorrect because this does not describe the relationship defining excess demand.
Used
- Definition Identification
Application: Recall the NCERT definition of excess demand.
Final Logic: Excess demand exists when Aggregate Demand exceeds full-employment output. Therefore, Option D is correct.
"Demand More Than Capacity = Excess Demand."
19
An increase in autonomous spending triggers successive rounds of induced consumption, causing output to rise by more than the initial increase.
The passage states that: Aggregate output is determined by Aggregate Demand. Autonomous spending shifts Aggregate Demand upward. The multiplier process generates repeated rounds of expenditure. Therefore, the increase in output exceeds the original increase in autonomous spending. Hence, Option B is correct.
- Option A) Incorrect because output increases rather than decreases.
- Option C) Incorrect because output changes even when prices remain fixed.
- Option D) Incorrect because the multiplier makes the increase larger than the initial spending.
Used
- Passage-Based Concept
Application: Identify the effect of autonomous spending described in the passage.
Final Logic: The multiplier causes output to increase by more than the initial spending. Therefore, Option B is correct.
"Autonomous Spending β Multiplied Output."
20
A decrease in autonomous spending lowers Aggregate Demand, and the multiplier amplifies this decline, causing equilibrium output to fall by more than the initial reduction.
According to the Effective Demand Principle: A fall in autonomous spending shifts the Aggregate Demand curve downward. Firms reduce production. Lower income reduces consumption further. The multiplier process spreads the decline throughout the economy. Therefore, aggregate output decreases by a larger amount than the original fall in autonomous spending. Hence, Option C is correct.
- Option A) Incorrect because output does not initially increase.
- Option B) Incorrect because fixed prices do not prevent output from changing.
- Option D) Incorrect because the model assumes prices remain fixed during the analysis.
Used
- Passage-Based Application
Application: Apply the multiplier process to a decrease in autonomous spending.
Final Logic: Lower autonomous spending leads to a multiplied decrease in equilibrium output. Therefore, Option C is correct.
"Less Spending β Multiplied Fall in Income."
