CUET UG Economics Booster Test 2 - Growth and Informalisation
π Answers are locked once submitted β results and explanations appear at the end.
QUESTION 1 OF 20
QUESTION 2 OF 20
QUESTION 3 OF 20
How does an increase in government enterprise output indirectly affect employment in private enterprises?
QUESTION 4 OF 20
Despite a continuous ________ in GDP during 1950-2010, the growth rate was not perfectly smooth due to various economic ________.
QUESTION 5 OF 20
Which scenario best illustrates 'jobless growth' as described by scholars?
QUESTION 6 OF 20
Match the following Regarding growth indicators:
| List I | List II |
|---|---|
| 1. Late 1990s trend | a. Widening gap between output and jobs |
| 2. GDP Growth (1950β2010) | b. Grew positively with fluctuations |
| 3. Employment Growth (1950β2010) | d. Not more than 2% |
| 4. Indicator of jobless growth | c. Started declining to early planning levels |
QUESTION 7 OF 20
Why does agriculture lose its share of total employment during the economic development of a country?
QUESTION 8 OF 20
Correct Statements:
1. The service sector's share of the workforce increased from 15% to about 30% between 1972 and 2024.
2. The secondary sector's share remained stagnant at 11% throughout this period.
QUESTION 9 OF 20
Why does the casualisation of the workforce make workers highly vulnerable?
QUESTION 10 OF 20
Worker status and their workforce share in 2023β24:
| List I | List II |
|---|---|
| 1. Self-employed | a. 21.7% |
| 2. Regular Salaried Employees | b. 46.1% |
| 3. Casual Wage Labourers | c. 19.9% |
| 4. Primary Sector proportion | d. 58.4% |
QUESTION 11 OF 20
Informal Sector Enterprises = Total Enterprises - (Public Sector Establishments + Private Establishments with ________).
QUESTION 12 OF 20
Arrange the events describing the informalisation of Ahmedabad textile workers in logical order:
1. Mills closed down spread over 10 years.
2. Workers originally had secure jobs with living wages.
3. Over 80,000 permanent workers lost jobs.
4. Workers were driven into informal sector poverty.
QUESTION 13 OF 20
In 2012, out of about 30 million formal sector workers, approximately how many were employed by the public sector?
QUESTION 14 OF 20
Formal sector workers form ________ to bargain with employers for better wages and other ________ measures.
QUESTION 15 OF 20
Assertion (A): Developmental planning initially envisaged that informal sector employment would dwindle as the economy grows.
Reason (R): About 89% of India's workforce is still trapped in the informal sector.
QUESTION 16 OF 20
What is a direct consequence of the lack of protection in the informal sector?
QUESTION 17 OF 20
How did the closure of textile mills in Ahmedabad affect the local society?
QUESTION 18 OF 20
The economic reform process in the early 1990s is associated with which employment outcome?
QUESTION 19 OF 20
Which organization has initiated efforts to modernize informal sector enterprises and provide social security measures?
QUESTION 20 OF 20
In the context of informal issues, the practice of outsourcing allows big firms to:
Test Complete!
Answer Review
1
Economic development is historically tied to a structural migration of labor away from primary production. The source text explicitly identifies this migration as a central target for international development blueprints. Reducing agricultural over-dependence creates space for industrial and tertiary labor expansion.
- The question demands basic information extraction from the provided passage. The text explicitly outlines that "Developmental strategies in many countries, including India, have aimed at reducing the proportion of people depending on agriculture." This structural shift transitions economies from low-productivity farm work into higher-value non-farm opportunities, validating Option D as the direct literal match.
- Option A is incorrect because it describes an economic reversal (moving labor back into farming), which contradicts both the passage and global development patterns.
- Option B is incorrect because increasing total population is a demographic trend, not a targeted employment allocation strategy mentioned in the text.
- Option C is incorrect because eliminating the secondary sector would destroy industrial capacity, running counter to any traditional development strategy.
Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application: Identifying the sentence in the text addressing "aimed at" and finding its exact mirror choice among the options.
Final Logic: Option D is selected because its wording exactly duplicates the stated policy target contained inside the text snippet.
Keyword Association: Development = Ditch Over-dependence on farming.
2
The primary sector employed about 74% of the workforce in 1972β73. By 2023β24, its share had fallen to about 46%. The decline equals 74% β 46% = 28 percentage points.
To calculate the decline in the primary sector's workforce share: Decline = Initial Share β Final Share Decline = 74% β 46% = 28% Therefore, the primary sector's workforce share declined by approximately 28 percentage points, making Option C the correct answer.
- Option A (10%): Too small; the actual decline is much larger.
- Option B (15%): Does not match the difference between 74% and 46%.
- Option D (40%): Overstates the decline; a 40% drop would reduce the share to 34%.
Used: Direct Calculation
Application:
- Decline = 74 β 46
- = 28
Final Logic: Subtract the later percentage from the earlier percentage to obtain the decline.
74% β 46% = 28%
3 How does an increase in government enterprise output indirectly affect employment in private enterprises?
Public sector expansions generate strong forward and backward linkages across the broader economy. Increased supply of public infrastructure or raw inputs makes operations more efficient for downstream private buyers. Access to reliable inputs allows private firms to scale up production and hire more workers.
- Economic interdependencies ensure that public sector output expansions create positive spillover effects for private firms. When a state enterprise expands its supply of essential inputs (like steel, power, or transport), private businesses purchasing these goods can run more reliably, lower their costs, scale up operations, and hire additional labor. This indirect job creation through forward linkages is accurately captured in Option B.
- Option A is incorrect because it describes a destructive "crowding out" scenario, ignoring the supportive supply-chain links between public inputs and private growth.
- Option C is incorrect because public output expansion typically provides materials to private firms, rather than blocking their production.
- Option D is incorrect because "only increases formal employment globally" uses an unrealistic global generalization that ignores domestic informal labor realities.
Used: Extreme Word Filter
Application: Eliminating options containing restrictive or absolute terms like "forces" (A), "stops" (C), or "only... globally" (D).
Final Logic: Option B is selected because it uses balanced, realistic language to describe how supply chains connect public inputs with private expansion.
Linkage Logic: More Public Input $\rightarrow$ More Private Output $\rightarrow$ More Jobs.
4 Despite a continuous ________ in GDP during 1950-2010, the growth rate was not perfectly smooth due to various economic ________.
Long-term macroeconomic records confirm that India's total aggregate output expanded consistently over the six-decade window. This aggregate expansion occurred despite cyclical short-term disruptions like droughts and external price shocks. The resulting path reflects an upward long-term trend paired with short-term volatility.
- Over the 1950-2010 time frame, India's Gross Domestic Product maintained a positive long-term trajectory, meaning the country avoided multi-decade economic contractions. However, this upward path was not a perfectly straight line; it saw notable short-term ups and downs driven by agricultural shocks, fiscal adjustments, and external factors. This pattern is accurately summarized as positive growth accompanied by economic fluctuations, making Option A correct.
- Option B is incorrect because "negative growth" contradicts the historical reality of India's long-term output expansion.
- Option C is incorrect because terms like "decline" describe a shrinking economy, which does not match India's structural growth path.
- Option D is incorrect because "stagnation" implies zero long-term growth, which ignores the substantial increase in output over those decades.
Used: Elimination
Application: Filter out options containing negative terms like "negative," "decline," or "stagnation" for the first blank to align with the reality of India's long-term growth.
Final Logic: Option A is selected because it matches the historical reality of long-term economic expansion accompanied by natural short-term business cycles.
Growth Reality: The economy kept moving Up (Positive), but the path stayed Bumpy (Fluctuations).
5 Which scenario best illustrates 'jobless growth' as described by scholars?
Jobless growth describes a clear structural split between economic output and job creation. This occurs when production climbs via automation or longer hours without adding new workers. The resulting pattern shows an expanding economy paired with a flatlining job market.
- "Jobless growth" is an economic phenomenon where an economy successfully expands its output (steady GDP growth) without creating a corresponding rise in employment opportunities. This dynamic was particularly visible in India during the late 1990s and early 2000s, when modernization and technology allowed firms to produce more goods without expanding their payrolls, as described in Option D.
- Option A is incorrect because a drop in both GDP and jobs describes a standard economic recession, not jobless growth.
- Option B is incorrect because job growth outpacing production growth describes a highly labor-intensive, low-productivity expansion.
- Option C is incorrect because a total lack of growth in both metrics indicates general economic stagnation.
Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application: Breaking down the term into its two functional components: "Jobless" (minimal employment growth) and "Growth" (steady GDP expansion).
Final Logic: Option D is selected because it is the only choice that captures both parts of the term's core economic definition.
Mnemonic: Growth = GDP Up; Jobless = Employment Flat.
6 Match the following Regarding growth indicators:
| List I | List II |
|---|---|
| 1. Late 1990s trend | a. Widening gap between output and jobs |
| 2. GDP Growth (1950β2010) | b. Grew positively with fluctuations |
| 3. Employment Growth (1950β2010) | d. Not more than 2% |
| 4. Indicator of jobless growth | c. Started declining to early planning levels |
In the late 1990s, employment growth declined towards levels observed during the early planning period. GDP growth from 1950β2010 remained positive overall, though it experienced fluctuations. Employment growth during 1950β2010 remained below 2%. Jobless growth is indicated by a widening gap between output growth and employment growth.
- Late 1990s trend (1) β c. Started declining to early planning levels β’ GDP Growth (1950β2010) (2) β b. Grew positively with fluctuations β’ Employment Growth (1950β2010) (3) β d. Not more than 2% β’ Indicator of jobless growth (4) β a. Widening gap between output and jobs Thus, the correct matching is: 1-c, 2-b, 3-d, 4-a Answer: Option C
- Option A: Incorrect because GDP growth is not the indicator of jobless growth.
- Option B: Incorrect because the late 1990s trend refers to declining employment growth, not the 2% employment growth figure.
- Option D: Incorrect because the late 1990s trend itself is not the indicator of jobless growth.
Used: Option Grouping / Anchor Matching
Application:
- Jobless Growth Indicator β Widening gap between output and jobs (4-a)
- Employment Growth (1950β2010) β Not more than 2% (3-d)
- These two anchor pairs immediately narrow the answer to Option C.
Final Logic: Matching the unique definitions and historical trends confirms 1-c, 2-b, 3-d, 4-a.
- GDP Growth = Positive but Fluctuating β (2-b)
7 Why does agriculture lose its share of total employment during the economic development of a country?
Economic modernization naturally shifts labor from traditional farming to non-farm industries. Rising productivity in secondary and service sectors pulls workers in with the promise of higher wages. This transition is a standard structural feature of developing economies worldwide.
- As an economy matures, the share of people working in agriculture naturally declines. This structural shift happens because developing industrial and service sectors offer more secure jobs, higher productivity, and better wages. This wage gap pulls surplus labor away from rural farming and into urban manufacturing and tertiary roles, as described in Option B.
- Option A is incorrect because no developing nation bans agriculture, given its vital role in food security.
- Option C is incorrect because traditional agriculture in developing nations loses labor before it achieves widespread, advanced automation.
- Option D is incorrect because better rainfall would support farming activities rather than driving workers away from the sector.
Used: Extreme Word Filter
Application: Instantly eliminate Option A because claims of a government "ban" on farming are highly unrealistic.
Final Logic: Option B is selected because it correctly describes the standard historical migration of labor from primary production to secondary and tertiary industries.
Mnemonic: Development is a One-Way Traffic Flow from farms to factories and offices.
8 Correct Statements:
1. The service sector's share of the workforce increased from 15% to about 30% between 1972 and 2024.
2. The secondary sector's share remained stagnant at 11% throughout this period.
India's service sector has expanded significantly over the past fifty years, doubling its share of total employment. The secondary sector (manufacturing and construction) also grew, rather than staying flat. This dual growth reflects a broader structural shift away from an agrarian-dominated workforce.
- Statement 1 is factually accurate: India's service sector expanded its workforce share from roughly 15% in 1972-73 to about 30% by 2023-24. However, Statement 2 is incorrect because the secondary sector's employment share did not stay stuck at 11%; it grew to around 24-25% over the same period, driven largely by a boom in construction and manufacturing. Since only the first statement is correct, Option A is the right answer.
- Option B is incorrect because it validates Statement 2, which misrepresents the growth of the secondary sector.
- Option C is incorrect because it wrongly assumes the secondary sector's employment share stayed completely flat for fifty years.
- Option D is incorrect because it overlooks the factual accuracy of the service sector data presented in Statement 1.
Used: Fact Verification
Application: Cross-reference sector data to confirm that both manufacturing and services expanded, which disproves claims of stagnation in the secondary sector.
Final Logic: Option A is selected because it correctly recognizes that only the service sector trend statement aligns with historical records.
Sector Check: Services doubled (15% $\rightarrow$ 30%), while the secondary sector grew rather than staying stagnant.
9 Why does the casualisation of the workforce make workers highly vulnerable?
Casual workers are hired on short-term, temporary agreements without job security. They operate outside standard legal protections and lack access to collective bargaining. They are excluded from employer-backed safety nets like pensions or medical insurance.
- Casualisation refers to a structural shift where regular or self-employed roles are replaced by daily-wage jobs. These workers face high economic vulnerability because they lack employment contracts, steady income streams, legal protection from sudden dismissal, and institutional social security benefits (like provident funds or health insurance). This directly matches the explanation in Option D.
- Option A is incorrect because casual workers typically earn low, unpredictable daily wages rather than high, regular salaries.
- Option B is incorrect because casual labor is rarely organized into active trade unions, leaving workers without collective bargaining power.
- Option C is incorrect because casual laborers are generally landless or near-landless rural and urban poor, not large landowners.
Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application: Connect the negative tone of "highly vulnerable" with an option that details systemic risks like a lack of income stability and social safety nets.
Final Logic: Option D is selected because it is the only choice that explains the systemic lack of protection that creates worker vulnerability.
Vulnerability Breakdown: Casual Work = No Contract + No Benefits + No Security.
10 Worker status and their workforce share in 2023β24:
| List I | List II |
|---|---|
| 1. Self-employed | a. 21.7% |
| 2. Regular Salaried Employees | b. 46.1% |
| 3. Casual Wage Labourers | c. 19.9% |
| 4. Primary Sector proportion | d. 58.4% |
Self-employed workers constitute the largest share of India's workforce. Regular salaried employees account for a little over one-fifth of total workers. Casual wage labourers form a smaller segment of the workforce. The primary sector continues to employ a significant proportion of workers.
- Self-employed (1) β d. 58.4% β’ Regular Salaried Employees (2) β a. 21.7% β’ Casual Wage Labourers (3) β c. 19.9% β’ Primary Sector proportion (4) β b. 46.1% Thus, the correct matching is: 1-d, 2-a, 3-c, 4-b Answer: Option C
- Option A: Incorrect because it assigns only 21.7% to self-employed workers, whereas self-employment is the largest category.
- Option B: Incorrect because it matches self-employed workers with the primary sector share (46.1%), which represents sectoral employment rather than employment status.
- Option D: Incorrect because it assigns 19.9% to self-employed workers and 58.4% to regular salaried employees, reversing the actual proportions.
Used: Option Grouping / Anchor Matching
Application:
- Self-employed workers form the largest employment-status category β 58.4% (1-d).
- Casual wage labourers account for 19.9% (3-c).
- These anchor pairs immediately identify Option C.
Final Logic: Matching the largest workforce category with 58.4% and aligning the remaining employment-status shares confirms Option C.
Primary Sector = 46.1%
11 Informal Sector Enterprises = Total Enterprises - (Public Sector Establishments + Private Establishments with ________).
India defines its formal sector using a specific legal employment threshold. Any private business that reaches or crosses this employment mark transitions into the formal sector. Enterprises that fall below this line are classified as part of the informal economy.
- According to the official statistical framework used in India, the formal (organized) sector includes all public sector operations and any private enterprises that employ 10 or more hired workers. By subtracting these two categories from the total pool of enterprises, we are left with the informal sector definition, confirming Option B as correct.
- Option A is incorrect because family workers do not alter the formal classification, which relies strictly on hired employment counts.
- Option C is incorrect because foreign investment status does not determine an enterprise's formal or informal classification.
- Option D is incorrect because trade unions are a result of formal organization, not the baseline metric used to define the sector.
Used: Substitution
Application: Plugging the 10-worker regulatory threshold into the definition formula to complete the equation.
Final Logic: Option B is selected because it correctly uses the official statutory employment threshold that separates formal firms from informal ones.
The Magic Number: The formal sector line starts at 10 Hired Hands.
12 Arrange the events describing the informalisation of Ahmedabad textile workers in logical order:
1. Mills closed down spread over 10 years.
2. Workers originally had secure jobs with living wages.
3. Over 80,000 permanent workers lost jobs.
4. Workers were driven into informal sector poverty.
This sequence traces a clear historical timeline from stable employment to industrial closure and job loss. The process begins with a period of secure, union-protected manufacturing work. The narrative concludes with displaced workers being forced into unorganized, lower-paying jobs.
- This historical sequence follows a logical timeline of industrial change: 1. The baseline status: Workers originally had secure jobs with living wages (2). 2. The initial disruption: Mills closed down spread over 10 years (1). 3. The direct impact: Over 80,000 permanent workers lost jobs (3). 4. The long-term social outcome: Workers were driven into informal sector poverty (4). This step-by-step progression matches the sequence 2 1 3 4, which corresponds to Option A.
- Option B places the factory closures before establishing that the workers had secure jobs to begin with.
- Option C starts with the job losses, ignoring the initial baseline period of stable employment.
- Option D completely reverses the timeline, putting the final outcome of poverty at the very beginning.
Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application: Establish a clear cause-and-effect timeline: start with the stable baseline (2) and end with the long-term impact of poverty (4).
Final Logic: Option A is selected because it is the only choice that arranges the history from its secure starting point to its final social outcome.
Timeline Flow: Secure Jobs (2) Mill Closures (1) Job Losses (3) Poverty (4).
13 In 2012, out of about 30 million formal sector workers, approximately how many were employed by the public sector?
Historically, the public sector has been the largest employer within India's small formal economy. Government departments and state enterprises provided the majority of secure, contract-backed jobs. This distribution highlights the relatively small share of formal jobs generated by the private sector up to that point.
- According to standard NCERT labor data for 2012, India's formal workforce was quite small, totaling around 30 million workers. Of that group, the public sector was the primary employer, accounting for roughly 18 million workers, while the private sector employed the remaining 12 million. This distribution makes Option D the correct answer.
- Option A understates public employment, as 10 million would mistakenly place the state sector behind private formal employment.
- Option B represents only a tiny fraction of the formal workforce, ignoring the government's major role as an employer.
- Option C claims the public sector employed all 30 million workers, which completely ignores the existence of private formal jobs.
Used: Fact Verification
Application: Cross-referencing historical labor market figures to confirm that the state employed the majority share (18 million) of the formal workforce.
Final Logic: Option D is selected because it matches the exact historical dataset provided in the textbook for the year 2012.
Workforce Split: Out of 30 million formal jobs, 18M were Public vs 12M Private.
14 Formal sector workers form ________ to bargain with employers for better wages and other ________ measures.
Formal workers have the legal right to establish collective bargaining organizations. These organizations give workers the leverage needed to negotiate for fair compensation. They focus on securing safety nets like retirement pensions, health insurance, and workplace safety.
- Workers in the organized sector enjoy legal protections that allow them to form trade unions. These bodies give employees the collective leverage needed to sit down with management and bargain for better wages and essential social security measures (like pensions, medical leave, and injury compensation), making Option C the correct choice.
- Option A is incorrect because workers form labor unions rather than market "cooperatives" to handle internal workplace wage negotiations.
- Option B is incorrect because employees do not form "companies" or negotiate "tax" policy during standard salary discussions.
- Option D is incorrect because formal workers use recognized legal channels rather than "informal groups," and they negotiate for permanent benefits rather than "casual" measures.
Used: Elimination
Application: Match the workplace bargaining context with its standard institutional termsβ"trade unions" and "social security"βto eliminate unrelated options.
Final Logic: Option C is selected because it correctly pairs the primary tool of organized labor (trade unions) with its main goal (social security).
Action & Goal: Workers form Unions to protect their Security.
15 Assertion (A): Developmental planning initially envisaged that informal sector employment would dwindle as the economy grows.
Reason (R): About 89% of India's workforce is still trapped in the informal sector.
Early economic plans assumed that industrial growth would naturally absorb informal workers over time. In reality, India's economic growth pattern did not follow this expected path. The formal sector did not expand fast enough, leaving the vast majority of workers in the informal economy.
- Both statements are factually correct but describe an expectation versus its actual outcome. Assertion A is true: early planners expected that modern industrial growth would gradually phase out informal roles. Reason R is also true: contemporary data shows that roughly 89% of Indian workers remain in the informal sector. However, Reason R describes the current reality that contradicts the original plan, rather than explaining why planners held that initial expectation, making Option B correct.
- Option A is incorrect because both statements are factually accurate on their own.
- Option C is incorrect because the current reality (89% informal) is a departure from early expectations, meaning it does not serve as the causal explanation for Assertion A.
- Option D is incorrect because it labels the Assertion as false, ignoring the documented goals of India's early economic planning.
Used: Elimination
Application: Test the relationship between the statements using "because" to see if the second statement explains the first, or if they simply represent a plan versus its actual outcome.
Final Logic: Option B is selected because both statements are true, but they describe a policy expectation versus a conflicting reality rather than a direct cause-and-effect link.
Plan vs Reality: The plan was for the informal sector to shrink (A is true), but the reality is it stayed huge (R is true).
16 What is a direct consequence of the lack of protection in the informal sector?
Informal jobs operate outside the jurisdiction of formal labor courts and contract laws. Employers can adjust their staffing levels instantly without facing legal penalties or severance costs. This lack of regulation leaves workers exposed to sudden job losses without a financial cushion.
- Because the informal sector operates outside the reach of labor laws and formal employment contracts, workers have no legal job security. This means employers can dismiss workers at will during slow periods or downturns without notice or severance pay, making Option D the correct choice.
- Option B is incorrect because guaranteed maternity benefits are a legal requirement found only in the formal sector.
- Option C is incorrect because informal enterprises rarely receive direct state technology upgrades, operating largely on their own limited resources.
- Option D is incorrect because mandatory provident funds are an institutional benefit reserved exclusively for formal employees.
Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application: Connect the negative concept of "lack of protection" with the option that describes a clear lack of security (dismissal without compensation).
Final Logic: Option D is selected because it accurately describes the real-world consequence of a lack of labor protections in the informal economy.
No Protection Reality: No Contracts = Uncompensated Dismissal.
17 How did the closure of textile mills in Ahmedabad affect the local society?
The collapse of a major regional industry can trigger severe social and economic disruptions. Displaced mill workers lost stable incomes and faced sudden poverty. This economic shock led to documented increases in local poverty, stress, and related social issues.
- The closure of Ahmedabad's large textile mills over a ten-year period removed a major source of stable, secure jobs in the region. Displaced workers were pushed into low-wage informal roles, which triggered a local economic recession and led to widespread social distress, including documented increases in alcoholism and suicides among affected families. This matches the historical account in Option D.
- Option A is incorrect because an industrial collapse hurts local communities rather than lifting global living standards.
- Option B is incorrect because urban mill closures do not generate secure, formal jobs in rural areas.
- Option C is incorrect because losing stable manufacturing jobs reduces household incomes rather than building middle-class wealth.
Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application: Align the negative economic impact of a major factory shutdown with the option that describes the resulting social and financial distress.
Final Logic: Option D is selected because it matches the documented social and economic outcomes of the Ahmedabad mill closures.
Case Study Outcome: Mill Shutdown = Economic Loss + Social Distress.
18 The economic reform process in the early 1990s is associated with which employment outcome?
The 1991 market liberalisation reforms encouraged private investment and increased competition. To cut fixed costs, many companies shifted toward outsourcing and flexible, temporary staffing models. This structural shift led to a relative decline in steady, formal sector positions.
- Economists point out that India's post-1991 economic reforms led to a relative decline in the share of formal sector jobs. To stay competitive in an open market, many businesses began outsourcing work to smaller, unorganized units, which limited the growth of secure, contract-backed formal employment and accelerated the informalisation of the workforce, as stated in Option C.
- Option A is incorrect because the 1990s reforms focused on deregulation and fiscal restraint, which slowed public sector hiring rather than expanding it.
- Option B is incorrect because India's workforce did not shift completely to the secondary sector; agriculture and services remained major employers.
- Option D is incorrect because casual labor expanded during this period rather than being eliminated.
Used: Extreme Word Filter
Application: Eliminate options that make absolute claims, such as a "complete shift" (B) or "total elimination" (D).
Final Logic: Option C is selected because it accurately describes the documented trend toward flexible staffing and informalisation following the 1991 reforms.
Reform Impact: Post-1991 Market Reforms Rise in Flexible Hiring Drop in Formal Share.
19 Which organization has initiated efforts to modernize informal sector enterprises and provide social security measures?
Protecting worker rights and improving labor conditions falls under a dedicated United Nations agency. This global body advocates for shifting informal workers into more secure, recognized roles. It works with governments to extend basic social safety nets to unorganized labor markets.
- The International Labour Organisation (ILO) is the specialized UN agency responsible for setting international labor standards and protecting worker rights. The ILO actively supports programs aimed at modernizing small, informal businesses, improving their productivity, and helping governments extend social safety nets to vulnerable, unorganized workforces, making Option B the correct choice.
- Option A is incorrect because the WHO focuses on international public health initiatives, not labor market transitions.
- Option C is incorrect because the World Bank focuses on long-term capital loans and infrastructure funding rather than setting labor protection frameworks.
- Option D is incorrect because the IMF focuses on global financial stability, balance-of-payments management, and macroeconomic policy.
Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application: Match the policy goal (protecting workers and organizing labor) with the specific mandate of the International Labour Organisation.
Final Logic: Option B is selected because the ILO is the dedicated global body responsible for workplace standards and worker welfare.
Keyword Match: Labor Issues = ILO (International Labour Organisation).
20 In the context of informal issues, the practice of outsourcing allows big firms to:
Outsourcing helps large corporations reduce fixed labor costs and long-term liabilities. It breaks large production processes down into smaller tasks contracted out to unorganized workshops. This model leaves subcontracted workers without formal company benefits or job security.
- Subcontracting and outsourcing are major drivers of modern informalisation. By routing work through smaller, independent suppliers or home-based workers, large corporations can avoid the long-term costs of maintaining a large formal staff. This allows them to pay strictly for completed tasks without providing pensions, healthcare, or job security, as described in Option A.
- Option B is incorrect because outsourcing is used to reduce long-term payroll obligations rather than handing out permanent contracts.
- Option C is incorrect because subcontracting avoids social security costs rather than expanding them for workers.
- Option D is incorrect because outsourcing is a method for managing production steps, not a decision to stop manufacturing entirely.
Used: Elimination
Application: Eliminate options that claim outsourcing creates permanent jobs (B) or expands benefits (C) to isolate the choice that reflects its role in cutting labor costs.
Final Logic: Option A is selected because it accurately describes how outsourcing relies on subcontracted, informal labor to minimize corporate benefit obligations.
Outsourcing Mechanism: Piecemeal Contracts = Lower Corporate Costs + No Benefits.
