CUET UG Booster Phychology Unit 6 Test (D 4 )
📌 Answers are locked once submitted — results and explanations appear at the end.
QUESTION 1 OF 20
Evaluate the following statements regarding the modification of an attitude:
I. Attitudes that are still in the formative stage are more resistant to change.
II. Congruent changes are generally easier to bring about than incongruent changes.
III. Modification can result in an attitude changing in a direction opposite to the existing attitude.
QUESTION 2 OF 20
Sequence the stages of opinion change and attitude modification based on the level of resistance to change, from LEAST resistant (easiest to change) to MOST resistant (hardest to change):
1. Attitudes that have become an inseparable part of the person's values.
2. Attitudes that are still in the formative stage (opinions).
3. Attitudes that are firmly established.
QUESTION 3 OF 20
Rahul (P) wants to ban plastic bags (X), so his P-X attitude is positive towards the ban. His friend Amit (O) strongly opposes the ban (O-X is negative). For the situation to achieve a balance state through the O-P relationship, how should Rahul and Amit perceive each other?
QUESTION 4 OF 20
In the P-O-X model, what logically dictates the transition from an unbalanced to a balanced state?
QUESTION 5 OF 20
Match the P-O-X scenarios with their corresponding state (Balance or Imbalance):
| List I (P-O-X Scenario) | List II (State) |
|---|---|
| 1. P(+), O(+), X(+) | A. Balance |
| 2. P(-), O(-), X(+) | B. Imbalance |
| 3. P(+), O(-), X(+) | C. Balance |
| 4. P(-), O(-), X(-) | D. Imbalance |
QUESTION 6 OF 20
Which of the following is an INCORRECT statement regarding cognitive imbalance and attitude adjustment?
QUESTION 7 OF 20
Arrange the following cognitive states/steps experienced by the $1 group in Festinger's experiment in the correct conceptual order:
1. Cognition that “I told a lie for only $1.”
2. Modifying the initial cognition to “The experiment was actually interesting.”
3. Initial cognition that “The experiment was very boring.”
4. Feeling a sense that something is ‘out of tune’ (Dissonance).
QUESTION 8 OF 20
In the context of the twenty-dollar lie experiment, the group paid $20 did not change their attitude because they did not experience ______; they felt their behaviour was justified by the large reward.
QUESTION 9 OF 20
Consider the following analytical statements about cognitive consistency:
I. It requires that two components of the attitude system must be in the same direction.
II. It demands that each element logically falls in line with the others to prevent mental discomfort.
III. Cognitive dissonance theory contradicts the basic premise of cognitive consistency.
Which statement(s) is/are conceptually valid?
QUESTION 10 OF 20
A person holds a strong belief that animal cruelty is wrong, yet continues to buy cosmetics tested on animals. Upon realizing this logical disharmony, the person feels mental discomfort and decides to switch to cruelty-free products. This specific adjustment to restore logical harmony is primarily an application of:
QUESTION 11 OF 20
Identify the INCORRECT analytical statement regarding identification in S.M. Mohsin’s two-step concept:
QUESTION 12 OF 20
Which statement best describes the mechanism of behaviour imitation in the final step of the two-step attitude change process?
QUESTION 13 OF 20
Match the following:
| List I (Characteristic) | List II (Description) |
|---|---|
| 1. Extremeness (Strength) | A. Overall positivity or negativity of an attitude |
| 2. Centrality | B. Number of ‘member’ attitudes within a broader attitude |
| 3. Multiplexity | C. Indicates how far positive or negative an attitude is |
| 4. Valence | D. Role of an attitude in influencing the broader system |
QUESTION 14 OF 20
A person has a deeply ingrained, central negative attitude towards military expenditure, which subsequently dictates their attitudes towards taxation, foreign policy, and voting preferences. If someone attempts to change this person's view on taxation, they are likely to fail due to the original attitude's:
QUESTION 15 OF 20
When analyzing source factors, attitudes are more likely to change when the message comes from a highly _______ source rather than a low- _______ source.
QUESTION 16 OF 20
Consider the following statements on source attractiveness and credibility:
I. High credibility experts are always more persuasive than popular public figures, regardless of the product.
II. Sales of cars can increase significantly if publicized by popular public figures due to source attractiveness.
III. Source characteristics are completely irrelevant if the target is highly intelligent.
QUESTION 17 OF 20
Which of the following is an INCORRECT analytical deduction regarding rational and emotional appeals?
QUESTION 18 OF 20
According to research on message characteristics, an advertisement containing a/an ______ appeal about dental cavities might fail to persuade if it generates too much fear, causing the receiver to turn off.
QUESTION 19 OF 20
QUESTION 20 OF 20
Test Complete!
Answer Review
1 Evaluate the following statements regarding the modification of an attitude:
I. Attitudes that are still in the formative stage are more resistant to change.
II. Congruent changes are generally easier to bring about than incongruent changes.
III. Modification can result in an attitude changing in a direction opposite to the existing attitude.
Formative attitudes are easier to change. Congruent changes face less resistance. Attitudes can reverse direction.
Statement I is incorrect because formative attitudes behave like opinions and are easier to modify. Statement II is correct because congruent changes align with existing beliefs and therefore occur more easily. Statement III is also correct because attitude modification may move in the opposite direction from the original attitude.
- Option A → Statement I is false.
- Option C → Statement III is also correct.
- Option D → Statement I invalidates the option.
- Concept Validation
Application:
- �� Compare stable and formative attitudes.
Final Logic:
- �� Flexible attitudes change more easily than fixed values.
- Opinions bend, values resist.
2 Sequence the stages of opinion change and attitude modification based on the level of resistance to change, from LEAST resistant (easiest to change) to MOST resistant (hardest to change):
1. Attitudes that have become an inseparable part of the person's values.
2. Attitudes that are still in the formative stage (opinions).
3. Attitudes that are firmly established.
Opinions are easiest to change. Firm attitudes are more stable. Values are hardest to modify.
Formative attitudes or opinions are the least resistant because they are not deeply rooted. Firmly established attitudes are more resistant, while values are the most stable and difficult to change because they become inseparable from the person’s belief system.
- Option A → Values are more resistant than established attitudes.
- Option B → Values cannot be easiest to change.
- Option C → Opinions are not more resistant than firm attitudes.
- Sequence Analysis
Application:
- �� Arrange attitudes according to stability.
Final Logic:
- �� Greater internalization means stronger resistance.
- Opinion → Attitude → Value.
3 Rahul (P) wants to ban plastic bags (X), so his P-X attitude is positive towards the ban. His friend Amit (O) strongly opposes the ban (O-X is negative). For the situation to achieve a balance state through the O-P relationship, how should Rahul and Amit perceive each other?
Two negatives and one positive create balance. Opposite views create tension. Relationship adjustment restores harmony.
Rahul likes the ban while Amit dislikes it. To create a balanced P-O-X state, the relationship between Rahul and Amit must become negative. This produces two negative relations and one positive relation, which forms a balanced state.
- Option A → Two positives and one negative create imbalance.
- Option C → Changing attitudes is unnecessary if the relationship changes.
- Option D → Neutrality does not establish balance.
- Pattern Recognition
Application:
- �� Apply the balance rule of the P-O-X triangle.
Final Logic:
- �� Two negatives + one positive = balance.
- Opposite beliefs weaken relationships.
4 In the P-O-X model, what logically dictates the transition from an unbalanced to a balanced state?
Imbalance creates discomfort. People seek logical harmony. Contradictions motivate change.
In Heider’s Balance Theory, imbalance occurs when relationship patterns create logical inconsistency. The psychological discomfort produced by this inconsistency motivates attitude adjustment to restore balance.
- Option A → Centrality is unrelated to balance restoration.
- Option C → Three negative relationships create imbalance.
- Option D → Emotional appeals do not define balance theory.
- Conceptual Matching
Application:
- �� Identify the psychological force behind attitude change.
Final Logic:
- �� Logical discomfort drives balance restoration.
- Discomfort pushes balance.
5 Match the P-O-X scenarios with their corresponding state (Balance or Imbalance):
| List I (P-O-X Scenario) | List II (State) |
|---|---|
| 1. P(+), O(+), X(+) | A. Balance |
| 2. P(-), O(-), X(+) | B. Imbalance |
| 3. P(+), O(-), X(+) | C. Balance |
| 4. P(-), O(-), X(-) | D. Imbalance |
�� Balanced states contain an even number of negative relations or all positive relations. �� Imbalanced states contain an odd number of negative relations. �� Balance theory seeks cognitive consistency.
- In Heider's P-O-X Balance Theory, a balanced state exists when all relationships are positive or when there are two negative and one positive relationship. → P(+), O(+), X(+) represents complete agreement and is therefore Balanced (A). → P(-), O(-), X(+) contains two negative relationships and one positive relationship, making it Balanced (C). → P(+), O(-), X(+) contains one negative relationship, producing inconsistency and therefore Imbalanced (D). → P(-), O(-), X(-) contains three negative relationships, creating an odd number of negative relations and therefore Imbalanced (B). → Hence, the correct matching pattern is: 1-A, 2-C, 3-D, 4-B
- �� Option A → Incorrectly classifies Scenario 2 as Imbalance despite having two negative relations.
- �� Option B → Incorrectly assigns Scenario 4 as Balance although three negative relations create imbalance.
- �� Option D → Misclassifies Scenario 1, which is the classic balanced state.
- �� Option Grouping
Application:
- �� Count the number of negative relationships in each P-O-X triangle.
- �� Even negatives = Balance; Odd negatives = Imbalance.
Final Logic:
- �� Cognitive consistency is achieved when the sign multiplication of the triangle is positive.
- 0 or 2 Negatives = Balance; 1 or 3 Negatives = Imbalance
6 Which of the following is an INCORRECT statement regarding cognitive imbalance and attitude adjustment?
Three negatives create imbalance. Logical inconsistency causes discomfort. Attitude change restores harmony.
According to Balance Theory, all three negative relationships create imbalance rather than harmony. Therefore, Option B is incorrect.
- Option A → Imbalance motivates attitude adjustment.
- Option C → Two positives and one negative are imbalanced.
- Option D → Logical discomfort drives change.
- Odd One Out
Application:
- �� Identify the statement contradicting balance theory.
Final Logic:
- �� Three negatives do not create harmony.
- Too much negativity disrupts balance.
7 Arrange the following cognitive states/steps experienced by the $1 group in Festinger's experiment in the correct conceptual order:
1. Cognition that “I told a lie for only $1.”
2. Modifying the initial cognition to “The experiment was actually interesting.”
3. Initial cognition that “The experiment was very boring.”
4. Feeling a sense that something is ‘out of tune’ (Dissonance).
Boring task belief comes first. Contradictory behaviour follows. Dissonance leads to attitude change.
Participants first believed the task was boring. They then realized they lied for only $1, creating inconsistency. This produced dissonance, which they reduced by convincing themselves the task was actually interesting.
- Option B → Dissonance follows conflicting cognitions.
- Option C → Contradictory cognition must exist before discomfort.
- Option D → Initial cognition should occur first.
- Sequence Analysis
Application:
- �� Follow Festinger’s dissonance reduction process.
Final Logic:
- �� Contradiction creates discomfort and adjustment.
- Conflict → Tension → Rationalization.
8 In the context of the twenty-dollar lie experiment, the group paid $20 did not change their attitude because they did not experience ______; they felt their behaviour was justified by the large reward.
Large reward justified behaviour. No psychological discomfort emerged. Dissonance was absent.
Participants paid $20 felt sufficiently rewarded for lying, so their behaviour seemed justified. Since no inconsistency was felt, they did not experience cognitive dissonance and therefore did not change attitudes.
- Option A → Balance theory is unrelated here.
- Option B → Centrality concerns importance of attitudes.
- Option D → Persuasibility means openness to influence.
- Contextual Matching
Application:
- �� Identify the missing psychological condition.
Final Logic:
- �� Adequate justification removes dissonance.
- Big reward removes guilt.
9 Consider the following analytical statements about cognitive consistency:
I. It requires that two components of the attitude system must be in the same direction.
II. It demands that each element logically falls in line with the others to prevent mental discomfort.
III. Cognitive dissonance theory contradicts the basic premise of cognitive consistency.
Which statement(s) is/are conceptually valid?
Consistency requires alignment. Logical harmony prevents discomfort. Dissonance theory supports consistency principles.
Statements I and II correctly describe cognitive consistency. Statement III is incorrect because cognitive dissonance theory actually supports the idea that people seek consistency.
- Option A → Statement II is also correct.
- Option C → Statement III is false.
- Option D → Dissonance theory does not contradict consistency.
- Concept Validation
Application:
- �� Compare consistency theory with dissonance theory.
Final Logic:
- �� Dissonance theory explains the need for consistency.
- Minds seek harmony.
10 A person holds a strong belief that animal cruelty is wrong, yet continues to buy cosmetics tested on animals. Upon realizing this logical disharmony, the person feels mental discomfort and decides to switch to cruelty-free products. This specific adjustment to restore logical harmony is primarily an application of:
Belief and behaviour conflicted. Behaviour changed to restore harmony. Consistency reduces discomfort.
The person changes behaviour to align with beliefs about animal cruelty. This adjustment reflects the principle of cognitive consistency, where individuals seek harmony among thoughts and actions.
- Option A → Two-step change involves identification and imitation.
- Option B → Credibility concerns persuasive sources.
- Option D → P-O-X balance focuses on interpersonal relationships.
- Contextual Matching
Application:
- �� Compare belief-behaviour conflict with consistency theory.
Final Logic:
- �� Behaviour aligns with beliefs to restore harmony.
- Align actions with beliefs.
11 Identify the INCORRECT analytical statement regarding identification in S.M. Mohsin’s two-step concept:
�� Identification involves mutual attraction. �� The target admires and relates to the source. �� The source does not disregard the target.
- According to S.M. Mohsin’s two-step concept, identification occurs when the target develops liking, admiration, and regard for the source. → The source must also display a positive orientation toward the target, helping establish mutual attraction. → Therefore, identification is not a one-way process. → Statement B incorrectly assumes the source disregards the target, which contradicts the concept of mutual attraction.
- �� Option A → Correctly describes identification.
- �� Option C → Positive regard from the source facilitates identification.
- �� Option D → Liking and regard form the basis of identification.
- �� Elimination
Application:
- �� Remove statements consistent with mutual attraction and identify the contradictory statement.
Final Logic:
- �� Identification requires reciprocal positive regard, not disregard.
- Identify = Mutual Like
12 Which statement best describes the mechanism of behaviour imitation in the final step of the two-step attitude change process?
�� Observation precedes imitation. �� Behavioural modelling drives change. �� Imitation produces attitude change.
- In the second stage of Mohsin’s model, the target observes the source behaving differently toward the attitude object. → Because identification already exists, the target imitates the observed behaviour. → This imitation gradually leads to attitude change. → Hence, Option C correctly explains the mechanism.
- �� Option A → Focuses on message analysis, not imitation.
- �� Option B → Cognitive dissonance is not the central mechanism here.
- �� Option D → Attitude change is not produced through forceful commands.
- �� Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application:
- �� Identify the option that reflects modelling and imitation.
Final Logic:
- �� Observation plus imitation results in attitude change.
- See → Copy → Change
13 Match the following:
| List I (Characteristic) | List II (Description) |
|---|---|
| 1. Extremeness (Strength) | A. Overall positivity or negativity of an attitude |
| 2. Centrality | B. Number of ‘member’ attitudes within a broader attitude |
| 3. Multiplexity | C. Indicates how far positive or negative an attitude is |
| 4. Valence | D. Role of an attitude in influencing the broader system |
�� Extremeness measures intensity. �� Centrality measures influence. �� Multiplexity measures number of attitudes.
- Extremeness refers to the degree or intensity of positivity or negativity and matches C. → Centrality refers to the role of an attitude within the broader attitude system and matches D. → Multiplexity refers to the number of member attitudes contained in a broader attitude and matches B. → Valence refers to overall positive or negative direction and matches A. → Therefore, the correct matching is: 1-C, 2-D, 3-B, 4-A
- �� Option A → Confuses valence with extremeness.
- �� Option B → Incorrectly swaps centrality and valence.
- �� Option D → Misassigns all major attitude properties.
- �� Option Grouping
Application:
- �� Match each characteristic with its defining feature.
Final Logic:
- �� Intensity = Extremeness, Influence = Centrality, Number = Multiplexity, Direction = Valence.
(Extremeness–Intensity, Centrality–Role, Multiplexity–Number, Valence–Direction)
14 A person has a deeply ingrained, central negative attitude towards military expenditure, which subsequently dictates their attitudes towards taxation, foreign policy, and voting preferences. If someone attempts to change this person's view on taxation, they are likely to fail due to the original attitude's:
�� Central attitudes influence many others. �� Core beliefs resist indirect change. �� Peripheral attitudes are easier to modify.
- Central attitudes occupy a key position within the attitude system. → They strongly influence related attitudes and behaviours. → Because taxation attitudes are linked to the central attitude toward military expenditure, changing the peripheral outcome without altering the central attitude becomes difficult. → Therefore, high centrality explains the resistance to change.
- �� Option A → The attitude is central, not peripheral.
- �� Option B → Extremeness is not the primary reason here.
- �� Option D → Persuasibility refers to openness to change, not structural influence.
- �� Elimination
Application:
- �� Identify the property that controls other attitudes.
Final Logic:
- �� Central attitudes shape many related beliefs.
- Central = Controls Others
15 When analyzing source factors, attitudes are more likely to change when the message comes from a highly _______ source rather than a low- _______ source.
�� Credibility increases persuasion. �� Experts are often more convincing. �� Trust enhances attitude change.
- Source credibility is one of the strongest determinants of attitude change. → Messages delivered by trusted, knowledgeable, and reliable sources are more persuasive. → Individuals are more likely to accept and internalize information from credible communicators. → Hence, "credible" correctly completes the statement.
- �� Option B → Imbalance is unrelated to source quality.
- �� Option C → Peripheral is not a source characteristic.
- �� Option D → Dissonant refers to inconsistency, not credibility.
- �� Substitution
Application:
- �� Insert each option and identify the concept commonly associated with persuasion.
Final Logic:
- �� Greater credibility produces stronger attitude change.
- Trust → Change
16 Consider the following statements on source attractiveness and credibility:
I. High credibility experts are always more persuasive than popular public figures, regardless of the product.
II. Sales of cars can increase significantly if publicized by popular public figures due to source attractiveness.
III. Source characteristics are completely irrelevant if the target is highly intelligent.
�� Source attractiveness influences persuasion. �� Celebrities can affect purchasing behaviour. �� Credibility is not always superior in every context.
- Statement II is correct because attractive and popular public figures often influence consumer attitudes and purchasing decisions. → Statement I is incorrect because experts are not always more persuasive than celebrities in every situation or product category. → Statement III is incorrect because source characteristics continue to influence attitude change even among intelligent individuals. → Therefore, only Statement II is conceptually valid.
- �� Option A → Statement I uses the extreme word "always," making it incorrect.
- �� Option C → Statement III is incorrect.
- �� Option D → Statement III remains incorrect.
- �� Extreme Word Filter
Application:
- �� Identify absolute terms such as "always" and "completely."
Final Logic:
- �� Persuasion depends on context; extreme statements are usually inaccurate.
- Celebrity = Attraction = Influence
17 Which of the following is an INCORRECT analytical deduction regarding rational and emotional appeals?
�� Fear appeals have limits. �� Excessive fear can reduce persuasion. �� Balanced information is most effective.
- Emotional appeals often use fear to influence attitudes. → However, research shows that excessive fear can make individuals avoid, ignore, or reject the message. → Therefore, fear does not automatically guarantee permanent attitude change. → Option C is the incorrect statement.
- �� Option A → Correctly describes rational appeals.
- �� Option B → Correctly explains emotional appeals.
- �� Option D → Appropriate information quantity improves persuasion.
- �� Extreme Word Filter
Application:
- �� Look for absolute claims such as "always guarantees."
Final Logic:
- �� Excessive fear may create resistance instead of persuasion.
- Too Much Fear = Switch Off
18 According to research on message characteristics, an advertisement containing a/an ______ appeal about dental cavities might fail to persuade if it generates too much fear, causing the receiver to turn off.
�� Fear is an emotional appeal. �� Excessive fear reduces effectiveness. �� Emotional messages target feelings.
- Fear-based advertisements operate through emotional appeals. → Such appeals attempt to influence feelings and motives. → When fear becomes excessive, individuals may avoid the message rather than accept it. → Hence, emotional appeal correctly fills the blank.
- �� Option A → Rational appeals rely on logic and evidence.
- �� Option C → Balanced is not a recognized appeal type here.
- �� Option D → Central refers to attitude position, not message appeal.
- �� Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application:
- �� Match fear with the appeal type that targets emotions.
Final Logic:
- �� Fear functions through emotions, not logic.
- Fear = Feeling = Emotional
19
�� Self-esteem affects persuasibility. �� Low confidence increases susceptibility. �� High self-esteem resists change more strongly.
- The passage directly states that individuals with low self-esteem and lower confidence change their attitudes more easily. → Such individuals are generally more susceptible to persuasion and external influence. → People with higher self-esteem tend to maintain their existing attitudes more strongly. → Therefore, Option C is correct.
- �� Option A → High self-esteem reflects greater confidence.
- �� Option B → Low self-esteem does not increase resistance.
- �� Option D → The passage explicitly links self-esteem to attitude change.
- �� Elimination
Application:
- �� Select the option directly supported by the passage.
Final Logic:
- �� Lower confidence increases attitude change susceptibility.
- Low Self-Esteem = Easy Change
20
�� Open-minded individuals are more persuadable. �� Flexibility facilitates attitude change. �� Advertisers benefit from such targets.
- The passage explicitly states that people with open and flexible personalities change their attitudes more easily. → This quality is referred to as persuasibility. → Advertisers often target such individuals because they are more receptive to persuasive messages. → Therefore, Option C is correct.
- �� Option A → Strong prejudices reduce attitude change.
- �� Option B → Rigidity opposes persuasibility.
- �� Option D → Intelligence alone does not define persuasibility.
- �� Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application:
- �� Match the definition given in the passage with the correct personality trait.
Final Logic:
- �� Greater openness leads to greater persuasibility.
- Open Mind = Open to Change
