CUET UG Biology Booster Test 3 Theories and Mechanisms of Evolution
π Answers are locked once submitted β results and explanations appear at the end.
QUESTION 1 OF 20
The theory of special creation faced strong challenges in the nineteenth century. Which of the following modern findings provides the most direct analytical contradiction to the connotation that the earth is only about 4000 years old?
QUESTION 2 OF 20
Consider the following statements analyzing Lamarck's theory:
I. It relied on the premise that characteristics acquired during an organism's lifetime to survive environmental stress are passed to succeeding generations.
II. It explains the origin of variation as a completely random and directionless process.
III. It was widely accepted and forms one of the key concepts of modern population genetics. Which of the statements is/are logically accurate regarding Lamarck's historical viewpoint?
QUESTION 3 OF 20
Which of the following inferences was NOT analytically derived by Darwin from his observations during the H.M.S. Beagle voyage to refute the static model of life?
QUESTION 4 OF 20
Match the analytical observations of evolutionary evidence to their underlying conceptual principle:
| List 1 | List 2 |
|---|---|
| 1. Fossils found in sedimentary rocks of different ages | A. Directional natural selection |
| 2. Same basic bone pattern (humerus, radius, ulna) in whale flippers and bat wings | B. Divergent evolution |
| 3. Increased frequency of melanic moths after industrialization | C. Paleontological evidence |
| 4. Similar structures arising from a common ancestor but adapted to different functions | D. Homologous organs |
QUESTION 5 OF 20
From an analytical standpoint, Darwinian "reproductive fitness" is not merely about producing the maximum theoretical number of offspring. It is precisely defined as:
QUESTION 6 OF 20
Arrange the following conceptual steps linking genetic makeup to evolutionary success in the correct analytical sequence:
1. Natural Selection (nature selects the individuals).
2. Fitness (end result of the ability to adapt).
3. Genetic basis (pre-existing heritable traits).
4. Adaptive ability (better resource utilization in a hostile environment).
QUESTION 7 OF 20
Arrange the events showing the operation of natural selection leading to speciation as integrated with modern genetic understanding:
1. Pre-existing advantageous mutations/variations occur.
2. The frequency of genes and alleles changes in future generations.
3. Natural selection enhances reproductive success of adapted individuals.
4. Observation of new phenotypes (Speciation).
QUESTION 8 OF 20
Which of the following is NOT an analytical conclusion shared by the parallel works of both Darwin and Wallace?
QUESTION 9 OF 20
Match the Malthusian principles applied by Darwin to their corresponding evolutionary impact:
| List 1 | List 2 |
|---|---|
| 1. Limited natural resources | A. Provides the basis for differential survival and reproduction |
| 2. Inherent variation among individuals | B. Struggle for existence due to competition |
| 3. Exponential reproductive potential | C. Capacity of populations to increase rapidly under ideal conditions |
| 4. Stable population size in nature | D. Indicates environmental resistance and resource limitation |
QUESTION 10 OF 20
Analytically, what is the most critical consequence of the fact that population sizes in reality are limited despite their theoretical ability to grow exponentially?
QUESTION 11 OF 20
According to the nuanced Darwinian theory (contrasted with mutation theory), which type of variation does NOT typically lead to the branching descent and speciation Darwin described?
QUESTION 12 OF 20
Consider the following analytical statements regarding "built-in variation" and the stochastic nature of evolution:
I. Evolution is a directed determinism because organisms predictably develop built-in variations in response to new chemicals.
II. Built-in variations exist by chance mutation prior to environmental stress.
III. The selection of a preexisting variant by a new environment is a chance event in nature. Which statement(s) correctly reflect the text's view on evolution's mechanism?
QUESTION 13 OF 20
Why did later studies in population genetics need to bring clarity to De Vries's strict model of mutation causing speciation?
QUESTION 14 OF 20
Which of the following complex conclusions could NOT be exclusively drawn just from Hugo de Vries's work on evening primrose, without the later synthesis of population genetics?
QUESTION 15 OF 20
How does the mathematical concept of Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium analytically differentiate between "random directionless mutations" and the "directional" effect of natural selection?
QUESTION 16 OF 20
Fundamentally, why does the concept of "saltation" heavily contrast with the principle of "gradualism" in evolutionary mechanisms?
QUESTION 17 OF 20
QUESTION 18 OF 20
QUESTION 19 OF 20
In synthesizing Darwin's gradualism with De Vries's mutation theory, how does modern population biology view the role of mutation in gradual evolution?
QUESTION 20 OF 20
When natural selection leads to speciation by favoring more individuals that acquire peripheral character values at both ends of a distribution curve (resulting in two distinct variant populations), this specific process is termed:
Test Complete!
Answer Review
1 The theory of special creation faced strong challenges in the nineteenth century. Which of the following modern findings provides the most direct analytical contradiction to the connotation that the earth is only about 4000 years old?
The Theory of Special Creation suggested the Earth was young (approx. 4000 years). Modern geological and radiometric dating methods confirm the Earth is approximately 4.5 billion years old. The fossil record and geological strata provide a timeline that contradicts a "recent" creation.
The scientific consensus on the age of the Earth is based on radioactive dating of rocks and meteorites, establishing an age of about 4.5 billion years. The geological history allows for the slow, gradual process of evolution and fossil formation, which is incompatible with the 4000-year timescale proposed by special creationism. Option B is the correct choice because it directly addresses the temporal constraint that defines the conflict between classical theological views and modern evolutionary biology.
- Option A β Pasteur's work disproved spontaneous generation (abiogenesis) but does not directly address the geological age of the planet.
- Option C β Saltation is a mechanism for rapid change, but observing it in a lab does not provide evidence for the total age of the Earth.
- Option D β The genetic basis of adaptation explains how evolution works, not the duration of time over which it has occurred.
Used: Elimination
Application: Options A, C, and D describe biological mechanisms or experimental history, whereas only Option B addresses the specific chronological requirement of the question.
Final Logic: Only geological dating provides the evidence required to refute the age-based claims of special creation.
"Earth's age: Billions, not thousandsβcheck the rocks!"
2 Consider the following statements analyzing Lamarck's theory:
I. It relied on the premise that characteristics acquired during an organism's lifetime to survive environmental stress are passed to succeeding generations.
II. It explains the origin of variation as a completely random and directionless process.
III. It was widely accepted and forms one of the key concepts of modern population genetics. Which of the statements is/are logically accurate regarding Lamarck's historical viewpoint?
Lamarck proposed "Inheritance of Acquired Characters." Variation in Lamarckism is seen as "directed" by need/use, not random. Lamarckism is rejected by modern genetics.
Lamarck's theory, famously illustrated by the giraffe's neck, posited that organisms acquire traits through use or disuse and pass these to offspring (Statement I). Statement II is incorrect because Lamarck believed evolution was "teleological" (purpose-driven/directed), not random. Statement III is incorrect because modern population genetics is based on Darwinian/Mendelian principles, which disprove the inheritance of acquired somatic traits.
- Option B β Statement II is false; Lamarck's theory is inherently directed, not random.
- Option C β Both II and III are false.
- Option D β Statements II and III are historically and scientifically inaccurate.
Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application: Identify that Lamarckism = Inheritance of Acquired Characters (I is true) and discard Options suggesting it matches modern genetics (III is false).
Final Logic: Since III is false, A is the only viable choice.
"Lamarck = Acquired (the 'A' in Lamarck stands for Acquired)."
3 Which of the following inferences was NOT analytically derived by Darwin from his observations during the H.M.S. Beagle voyage to refute the static model of life?
Darwin observed fossils and current life to support descent with modification. Ernst Haeckel proposed the "Recapitulation Theory" (ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny), which is not Darwin's direct inference. Options A, B, and D are pillars of Darwinian evolutionary theory.
Darwin's work focused on common ancestry, extinction, and the correlation between past and present life. Option C refers to the "Biogenetic Law" (Haeckel), which suggested embryos pass through adult stages of ancestors; this is not only scientifically discredited but was not an observation derived by Darwin during the Beagle voyage.
- Option A β This was a key observation of Darwin regarding geological succession.
- Option B β Darwin emphasized that species change and disappear, replaced by new ones over time.
- Option D β Common ancestry is the core conclusion of Darwin's theory.
Used: Odd One Out
Application: A, B, and D are foundational Darwinian concepts; C is a specific, inaccurate embryological claim.
Final Logic: Identify C as the scientifically incorrect statement not linked to Darwin's Beagle findings.
"Darwin: Ancestry, not Recapitulation."
4 Match the analytical observations of evolutionary evidence to their underlying conceptual principle:
| List 1 | List 2 |
|---|---|
| 1. Fossils found in sedimentary rocks of different ages | A. Directional natural selection |
| 2. Same basic bone pattern (humerus, radius, ulna) in whale flippers and bat wings | B. Divergent evolution |
| 3. Increased frequency of melanic moths after industrialization | C. Paleontological evidence |
| 4. Similar structures arising from a common ancestor but adapted to different functions | D. Homologous organs |
Fossils = Paleontological evidence. Homologous organs = Same basic structure, different functions. Industrial melanism = Directional natural selection. Common ancestry with functional diversification = Divergent evolution.
Fossils preserved in sedimentary rocks provide paleontological evidence (1-C) for evolutionary change over time. The similar bone pattern in whale flippers and bat wings represents homologous organs (2-D), indicating a common ancestry. The rise of dark-colored moths after industrialisation is a classic example of directional natural selection (3-A). The modification of structures from a common ancestor to perform different functions demonstrates divergent evolution (4-B). Hence, the correct matching is: 1-C, 2-D, 3-A, 4-B.
- Option A incorrectly matches fossils with divergent evolution and misassigns the remaining concepts.
- Option C incorrectly associates fossils with homologous organs and mismatches the evolutionary principles.
- Option D incorrectly links fossils with directional selection and misplaces paleontological evidence.
Used: Concept Association
Application: Match each observation with its most direct evolutionary principle:
- Fossils β Paleontological evidence
- Shared bone pattern β Homologous organs
- Industrial melanism β Directional natural selection
- Common ancestry with different functions β Divergent evolution
Final Logic: 1-C, 2-D, 3-A, 4-B.
Common Ancestor β Divergence
5 From an analytical standpoint, Darwinian "reproductive fitness" is not merely about producing the maximum theoretical number of offspring. It is precisely defined as:
Fitness is "relative" (how well you do compared to others). It involves survival and reproductive output. It is not about "directed" mutations.
Darwinian fitness is defined by an organism's success in survival and reproduction within its specific environment. It is a measure of the relative contribution an individual makes to the gene pool of the next generation. Option B correctly identifies that fitness is linked to resource utilization and the production of viable, fertile offspring.
- Option A β This describes biotic potential, not fitness.
- Option C β Mutations are random, not directed by the organism.
- Option D β Population stability is an ecological outcome, not the definition of fitness.
Used: Substitution
Application: Replace "Fitness" with "Relative Reproductive Success" and see which option fits the definition best.
Final Logic: Only B captures the "relative success" and "survival" aspect of the term.
"Fitness = Survival + Viable Offspring."
6 Arrange the following conceptual steps linking genetic makeup to evolutionary success in the correct analytical sequence:
1. Natural Selection (nature selects the individuals).
2. Fitness (end result of the ability to adapt).
3. Genetic basis (pre-existing heritable traits).
4. Adaptive ability (better resource utilization in a hostile environment).
Genetics provide variation. Variation allows for adaptation. Adaptation leads to fitness. Nature selects the fit.
The sequence follows the logic of modern synthesis: First, an organism must have a genetic basis for a trait (3). This trait provides adaptive ability to use resources (4). Better adaptation leads to higher fitness (2). Finally, nature acts on this fitness to select the individual (1).
- Option B β Placing Selection (1) before Fitness (2) is logically circular in this specific context.
- Option C/D β Do not follow the logical flow from genotype to selection.
Used: Substitution
Application: Start with the prerequisite (Genetics) and end with the outcome (Selection).
Final Logic: Logic flows from internal trait (3) β interaction (4) β result (2) β environmental action (1).
"G-A-F-S (Genetics, Adaptation, Fitness, Selection)."
7 Arrange the events showing the operation of natural selection leading to speciation as integrated with modern genetic understanding:
1. Pre-existing advantageous mutations/variations occur.
2. The frequency of genes and alleles changes in future generations.
3. Natural selection enhances reproductive success of adapted individuals.
4. Observation of new phenotypes (Speciation).
Variation (Mutation) must exist first. Selection acts on that variation. Allele frequencies change over time. Accumulation leads to new phenotypes/speciation.
Evolution by natural selection begins with the presence of heritable variation or mutation (1). Natural selection acts by favoring those with the advantageous trait, increasing their reproductive success (3). This differential reproduction causes a change in the frequency of those genes in the population (2). Over time, these genetic shifts result in distinct new phenotypes or speciation (4).
- Option B β Allele frequency change (2) is a result of selection (3), not a precursor.
- Option C β Allele changes cannot happen before the occurrence of variation.
- Option D β Selection (3) cannot occur before variation exists (1).
Used: Elimination
Application: Eliminate any option where 1 is not the starting point.
Final Logic: Only A correctly sequences the causal chain of evolutionary change.
"Variation -> Selection -> Frequency Change -> Speciation."
8 Which of the following is NOT an analytical conclusion shared by the parallel works of both Darwin and Wallace?
Darwin and Wallace believed in gradualism. De Vries proposed saltation. "Saltation" is the antithesis of the Darwin-Wallace theory.
Both Charles Darwin and Alfred Russel Wallace independently arrived at the theory of natural selection, which emphasizes gradual adaptation through descent with modification. Option C is the correct answer because it describes the "Mutation Theory" of Hugo de Vries, not the Darwin-Wallace model, which specifically rejected large, sudden, saltatory changes as the primary driver of evolution.
- Option A β Both scientists concluded this.
- Option B β Both recognized the importance of the geological record.
- Option D β This is the fundamental definition of the selection process they both shared.
Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application: Identify the "Saltation" keyword as associated with De Vries, not Darwin/Wallace.
Final Logic: Since the question asks for the statement NOT shared, C is the outlier.
"Darwin-Wallace = Gradual; De Vries = Saltation."
9 Match the Malthusian principles applied by Darwin to their corresponding evolutionary impact:
| List 1 | List 2 |
|---|---|
| 1. Limited natural resources | A. Provides the basis for differential survival and reproduction |
| 2. Inherent variation among individuals | B. Struggle for existence due to competition |
| 3. Exponential reproductive potential | C. Capacity of populations to increase rapidly under ideal conditions |
| 4. Stable population size in nature | D. Indicates environmental resistance and resource limitation |
Limited resources β Struggle for existence. Variation β Differential survival and reproduction. Exponential reproductive potential β Rapid population growth under ideal conditions. Stable population size β Evidence of environmental resistance.
According to Malthus, populations possess the capacity for exponential growth (3-C), yet actual population sizes remain relatively stable because environmental factors impose limits (4-D). These limits create competition for resources, resulting in a struggle for existence (1-B). Darwin recognized that because individuals show inherent variation (2-A), some are better adapted to survive and reproduce, leading to differential survival and natural selection. Hence, the correct matching is: 1-B, 2-A, 3-C, 4-D.
- Option A incorrectly associates limited resources with differential survival and misplaces environmental resistance.
- Option B incorrectly matches variation and stable population size with unrelated consequences.
- Option D reverses the relationships between resource limitation, variation, and population growth.
Used: Cause-and-Effect Mapping
Application:
- Resource limitation β Competition.
- Variation β Selection.
- Reproductive potential β Population growth.
- Stable population size β Environmental resistance.
Final Logic: 1-B, 2-A, 3-C, 4-D.
Stable Population β Environmental Limits
10 Analytically, what is the most critical consequence of the fact that population sizes in reality are limited despite their theoretical ability to grow exponentially?
"Struggle for existence" is the core of Darwinism. Competition selects the best fit. Resource limits create the filter for selection.
Because populations cannot grow unchecked due to resource limits, a "struggle for existence" occurs. In this struggle, individuals with advantageous variations (which help in resource acquisition) are more likely to survive and reproduce. This is the mechanism that drives natural selection.
- Option A β Variation directionality is a separate issue from population growth dynamics.
- Option C β It actually enables natural selection, not prevents it.
- Option D β This is a Lamarckian concept (use and disuse), which is not the correct analytical result of population limitation.
Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application: Select the option that reflects the Darwinian "Struggle for Existence."
Final Logic: B aligns with the fundamental Darwinian mechanism regarding limited resources.
"Limited resources = Competition = Selection."
11 According to the nuanced Darwinian theory (contrasted with mutation theory), which type of variation does NOT typically lead to the branching descent and speciation Darwin described?
Darwinian evolution requires heritable variation to be passed to offspring. Somatic changes occur in body cells, not germ cells, and are not passed on. Non-heritable traits do not contribute to long-term evolutionary shifts (branching descent).
Darwin's theory is based on the accumulation of small, heritable, and continuous variations. Variations that are acquired via environmental induction on somatic tissues (the "acquired characters" concept) are not passed to offspring according to Mendelian and modern genetic principles. Therefore, these somatic changes cannot drive branching descent or speciation. Options: A, B, and C all describe mechanisms that are core to the Darwinian process of descent with modification.
- Option A β Small, continuous variations are the "raw material" of Darwinian evolution.
- Option B β Heritable improvements are exactly what selection acts upon.
- Option C β Directional changes are the signature result of natural selection.
Used: Elimination
Application: Filter out terms that are inherently "heritable" (A, B, C) to identify the "non-heritable" anomaly (D).
Final Logic: Only non-heritable traits fail to contribute to the evolutionary process over generations.
"Somatic = Static (they die with the individual)."
12 Consider the following analytical statements regarding "built-in variation" and the stochastic nature of evolution:
I. Evolution is a directed determinism because organisms predictably develop built-in variations in response to new chemicals.
II. Built-in variations exist by chance mutation prior to environmental stress.
III. The selection of a preexisting variant by a new environment is a chance event in nature. Which statement(s) correctly reflect the text's view on evolution's mechanism?
Mutations (variations) occur randomly, not in response to stress. Selection happens after the variation exists. Evolution is not "directed determinism."
Statement I is incorrect because evolution is not deterministicβit does not "predictably" create variations in response to a stimulus. Statement II is correct: mutations occur spontaneously/randomly, providing the raw material before selection occurs. Statement III is correct: the appearance of a variant and the arrival of an environmental change are both stochastic (chance) processes.
- Option A β Statement I describes a non-scientific, Lamarckian-style view.
- Option C β Incorrect because Statement I is false.
- Option D β Incomplete, as Statement II is also a foundational truth in modern evolutionary theory.
Used: Elimination
Application: Rule out I because it assumes directed evolution, then evaluate II and III.
Final Logic: Modern biology confirms variations arise by chance (II) and selection events are contingent (III).
"Mutations are random, not purposeful."
13 Why did later studies in population genetics need to bring clarity to De Vries's strict model of mutation causing speciation?
De Vries proposed "Mutation Theory" as the sole cause of speciation. Population genetics corrected this by integrating selection and drift. Mutations are random, but their fate is decided by selection/drift.
De Vries believed in "saltation"βthat large, sudden mutations were the primary driver of new species. He did not fully grasp how these random, directionless mutations were subsequently sorted by natural selection or genetic drift. Population genetics clarified that evolution is a change in allele frequencies governed by multiple factors, not just "sudden jumps."
- Option A β De Vries did believe in a physical basis (he was a geneticist).
- Option C β De Vries was not a Lamarckian; he was a mutationist.
- Option D β This is the opposite; De Vries was the champion of "sudden" change, not gradualism.
Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application: Pair De Vries with "Mutation" and contrast his "sudden" view with the "population genetics" view of "selection on random mutations."
Final Logic: B provides the correct historical and conceptual synthesis.
"De Vries = Sudden Jumps; Modern Genetics = Selection on Randomness."
14 Which of the following complex conclusions could NOT be exclusively drawn just from Hugo de Vries's work on evening primrose, without the later synthesis of population genetics?
De Vries focused on observable mutation in plants. Hardy-Weinberg, gene flow, and drift belong to Population Genetics. De Vries's work predates the complete H-W synthesis.
De Vries's study was purely experimental/phenotypic (observing Evening Primrose). Options: A, B, and C are observations or hypotheses that can be derived directly from his work. However, the mathematical modeling of population-wide gene frequencies (Hardy-Weinberg) and the specific roles of gene flow and genetic drift were developed as part of the "Modern Synthetic Theory" which happened after De Vries.
- Option A, B, C β These were directly related to his saltation theory.
Used: Elimination
Application: Identify the option that involves advanced population-level mathematics/theory (D) which De Vries did not formulate.
Final Logic: D is a post-De Vries discovery.
"Hardy-Weinberg = Mathematical Population Genetics, not early mutation study."
15 How does the mathematical concept of Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium analytically differentiate between "random directionless mutations" and the "directional" effect of natural selection?
Mutation provides variation (random). Selection acts on that variation (directional). H-W is the baseline (no change); evolutionary forces break it.
In the H-W model, allele frequencies remain constant unless acted upon by evolutionary forces. Mutations are a source of new variation (randomly occurring, not goal-oriented). Natural selection is the force that acts "directionally" on these variations, shifting frequencies in favor of adaptive traits.
- Option A β Mutations do not keep the pool constant; they alter it. Selection is not random.
- Option C β Selection can be directional, stabilizing, or disruptive.
- Option D β Mutations do not "restore" equilibrium; they are a source of change.
Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application: Match "Random" to Mutation and "Directional" to Selection.
Final Logic: B accurately defines the roles of these two distinct evolutionary forces.
"Mutation = Chance Source; Selection = Directional Sieve."
16 Fundamentally, why does the concept of "saltation" heavily contrast with the principle of "gradualism" in evolutionary mechanisms?
Saltation = Jump (Latin: saltare). Gradualism = Slow, steady steps. They are polar opposites in the speed of speciation.
Saltation (proposed by De Vries) suggests that species evolve through sudden, large-scale mutations (single-step). Gradualism (the Darwinian core) proposes that species arise through the accumulation of many small, beneficial mutations over immense time. B accurately captures this fundamental conflict.
- Option A β Swaps the definitions.
- Option C β Both have nothing to do with "use and disuse" (Lamarck).
- Option D β Saltation can occur in plants; gradualism is universal in nature.
Used: Elimination
Application: Rule out Options with incorrect definitions (A) or irrelevant mechanisms (C,D).
Final Logic: B is the precise definition of saltation.
"Saltation = Saltatory (dancing/jumping = sudden jumps)."
17
The passage states: "The world we see... is only the success stories of evolution." It also states: "When we describe the story of life on earth, we treat evolution as a consequence of a process called natural selection."
The provided passage explicitly frames the outcome of evolution (the species we see today) as "success stories" and links this to the process of natural selection. Option A directly mirrors the language used in the passage to categorize fixed, inherited adaptations.
- Option B β The passage does not support saltation.
- Option C β The passage mentions "ambiguity" regarding determinism, not predictability.
- Option D β Spontaneous generation was disproven (Pasteur).
Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application: Search the passage text for "success stories" and "consequence of... natural selection."
Final Logic: Match the phrasing in A with the provided text.
"Text says: Success stories = Consequence of Natural Selection."
18
Darwin defined "Descent with Modification." "Branching descent" is the key to the Tree of Life. It resolves the process/result duality.
To understand evolution as both a "process" (the mechanisms like selection and mutation) and a "result" (the history of life), modern biology relies on the concept of "Branching Descent." This explains how ancestors branched into various species over long geological time scales due to accumulated heritable variations.
- Option A β Acquired traits are not heritable (incorrect theory).
- Option C β The Earth is not 4000 years old.
- Option D β This is a cosmological, not biological, event.
Used: Elimination
Application: Eliminate A, C, and D based on scientific inaccuracy or irrelevance.
Final Logic: B is the only biological mechanism that explains evolutionary history.
"Life = Tree of Life = Branching Descent."
19 In synthesizing Darwin's gradualism with De Vries's mutation theory, how does modern population biology view the role of mutation in gradual evolution?
Synthesis = Darwinian Gradualism + Mendelian/Mutational Genetics. Mutation = Raw material. Selection = Sculptor.
Modern evolutionary theory (Modern Synthesis) combines Darwin's natural selection with the understanding of mutations. Mutations create new, random alleles (raw material), and natural selection acts on these alleles to steer the population's characteristics in a specific, adaptive direction over generations.
- Option A β Mutation is critical, not rejected.
- Option C β Saltation is not the primary mode of evolution.
- Option D β Mutations are not "directed" by selection.
Used: Substitution
Application: Replace "Mutation" with "Raw Material" and "Selection" with "Filter" in your mind to see if the sentence is correct.
Final Logic: B accurately synthesizes the two theories.
"Mutation (Material) + Selection (Sculptor) = Evolution."
20 When natural selection leads to speciation by favoring more individuals that acquire peripheral character values at both ends of a distribution curve (resulting in two distinct variant populations), this specific process is termed:
Stabilizing: Middle (mean) favored. Directional: One extreme favored. Disruptive: Both extremes favored (split in the middle).
When a population is subject to disruptive selection, individuals at both extremes of the phenotype distribution (the peripheral values) are favored over those with intermediate traits. This can lead to the population splitting into two distinct groups, which can eventually promote speciation.
- Option A β Favoring the average (mean) would be stabilizing.
- Option B β Favoring one extreme would be directional.
- Option D β Random change in allele frequency (not necessarily adaptation).
Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application: Match "both ends" with "Disruptive."
Final Logic: Disruptive selection describes the separation of the mean into two extremes.
"Disruptive = Splits the curve (Two ends)."
