CUET UG Biology Booster Test 1 Laws of Inheritance
📌 Answers are locked once submitted — results and explanations appear at the end.
QUESTION 1 OF 20
Why is the Discrete Unit Control theory essential to explain the recovery of the dwarf trait in the F2 generation?
QUESTION 2 OF 20
Which is NOT associated with Dissimilar Pair Interaction at a molecular level (per NCERT enzyme example)?
QUESTION 3 OF 20
Consider these statements on Allele Separation in Meiosis:
I. Separation occurs such that a gamete receives both alleles.
II. It is the basis for the lack of blending in inheritance.
III. It applies to both homozygous and heterozygous parents. Which statements are analytically correct?
QUESTION 4 OF 20
Match the following regarding the Gamete Purity Principle:
| Column-I | Column-II |
|---|---|
| 1. Homozygous parent | p. Two types of gametes (1:1) |
| 2. Heterozygous parent | q. 100 percent similar gametes |
| 3. Meiosis | r. Biological mechanism for segregation |
| 4. Fertilization | s. Restores the paired state in the zygote |
QUESTION 5 OF 20
In Intermediate Phenotype Expression, why does the F2 show a 1:2:1 phenotypic ratio?
QUESTION 6 OF 20
Which is NOT associated with the Snapdragon Flower Example?
QUESTION 7 OF 20
QUESTION 8 OF 20
QUESTION 9 OF 20
Match the components of Population Level Variation:
| Column-I | Column-II |
|---|---|
| 1. Multiple alleles | p. Found within a single individual |
| 2. Two alleles | q. Found in population studies |
| 3. Three alleles | r. ABO system trio (IA, IB, i) |
| 4. Six genotypes | s. Result of three alleles in a population |
QUESTION 10 OF 20
Arrange the Gene I genotypes from most dominant sugar production to least:
1. ii (No sugar)
2. IA IA (Sugar A)
3. IA IB (Both sugars)
4. IB i (Sugar B)
QUESTION 11 OF 20
In Two Character Inheritance, if the two genes were tightly linked, how would the results differ from Mendel's?
QUESTION 12 OF 20
Which is NOT associated with the Round-Yellow vs Wrinkled-Green setup?
QUESTION 13 OF 20
How is the 9:3:3:1 ratio analytically related to the Law of Segregation?
QUESTION 14 OF 20
In the Mathematical Combination Series, what does the (1/4) term in the expansion of (1/2T + 1/2t)^2 represent?
QUESTION 15 OF 20
Arrange the cytological events that explain Independent Pair Segregation:
1. Alignment of two chromosome pairs at the metaphase plate
2. Meiosis I anaphase segregation
3. Formation of four different chromosome combinations in germ cells
4. Independent orientation of different chromosome pairs
QUESTION 16 OF 20
Which is NOT associated with Hybrid Permutation Diversity in RrYy?
QUESTION 17 OF 20
Consider these statements on Graphical Probability Calculation:
I. It results in a square output form.
II. It allows for calculation of genotypic ratios.
III. It was developed to explain chromosomal movement. Which statements are correct?
QUESTION 18 OF 20
In Zygote Composition Derivation, crossing TtYy x TtYy forms how many different GENOTYPES?
QUESTION 19 OF 20
Why is Recessive Parent Crossing analytically superior for genotype determination?
QUESTION 20 OF 20
Which is NOT associated with Unknown Genotype Prediction?
Test Complete!
Answer Review
1 Why is the Discrete Unit Control theory essential to explain the recovery of the dwarf trait in the F2 generation?
Discrete units (factors) maintain their integrity. Recessive factors remain hidden but present in F1 (heterozygotes). F2 recovery confirms they were never lost.
The theory of Discrete Unit Control (particulate inheritance) posits that traits are governed by distinct factors that do not blend. In the F1 generation (Tt), the recessive factor 't' is masked by 'T' but remains physically present. Its reappearance in F2 (tt) proves that the recessive factor was preserved, not destroyed or lost, during the F1 stage.
- Option A → F1 phenotypes do not "blend"; they express the dominant trait.
- Option C → Factors exist in pairs in all diploid stages (P, F1, F2), not just F2.
- Option D → Recessive traits can be expressed when homozygous.
Used: Elimination
Application: Eliminate options describing blending or incorrect inheritance patterns.
Final Logic: Preservation of recessive alleles explains phenotypic reappearance.
Preserved = Present = Reappears.
2 Which is NOT associated with Dissimilar Pair Interaction at a molecular level (per NCERT enzyme example)?
Modified alleles often lose function (recessive). Normal (unmodified) alleles are usually dominant. Functioning enzymes drive the dominant phenotype.
NCERT explains that the dominant phenotype reflects the activity of the functional, unmodified allele. A modified allele (often the result of mutation) usually becomes non-functional or produces a different/less efficient enzyme, which constitutes a recessive allele. Therefore, the modified allele is rarely the dominant one.
- Option A → Correct: The unmodified allele is functional.
- Option B → Correct: Many recessive alleles are null mutations (loss of function).
- Option D → Correct: The "normal" enzyme determines the dominant phenotype.
Used: Odd One Out
Application: Identify the false statement regarding dominant/recessive allele function.
Final Logic: Modified = Usually Recessive; Unmodified = Dominant.
Unmodified = Normal = Dominant.
3 Consider these statements on Allele Separation in Meiosis:
I. Separation occurs such that a gamete receives both alleles.
II. It is the basis for the lack of blending in inheritance.
III. It applies to both homozygous and heterozygous parents. Which statements are analytically correct?
I: Incorrect (Gamete gets only ONE allele). II: Correct (Segregation keeps factors distinct). III: Correct (Applicable to any diploid).
Statement I is wrong because segregation ensures a gamete receives only one of the two alleles. Statement II is correct as segregation prevents the merging of factors (no blending). Statement III is correct because meiosis and allele segregation occur in all diploid organisms regardless of their zygosity.
- Option A, B, and D include the incorrect statement I or omit correct statements.
Used: Elimination
Application: Eliminate any option containing statement I.
Final Logic: Segregation = 1 factor per gamete.
Segregation = Separation (of pair).
4 Match the following regarding the Gamete Purity Principle:
| Column-I | Column-II |
|---|---|
| 1. Homozygous parent | p. Two types of gametes (1:1) |
| 2. Heterozygous parent | q. 100 percent similar gametes |
| 3. Meiosis | r. Biological mechanism for segregation |
| 4. Fertilization | s. Restores the paired state in the zygote |
Homozygous (AA) = 1 type (q). Heterozygous (Aa) = 2 types (p). Meiosis = Segregation (r). Fertilization = Fusion (s).
Homozygous parents produce identical gametes (1-q). Heterozygous parents produce two types of gametes in equal proportions (2-p). Meiosis is the cellular process facilitating allele segregation (3-r). Fertilization brings gametes together to restore the diploid (paired) state (4-s).
- Options B, C, and D contain incorrect mapping of biological processes to genetic outcomes.
Used: Substitution
Application: Map each genetic term to its definition in the table.
Final Logic: Homos produce one type; Heteros produce two; Meiosis separates; Fertilization unites.
Homo=Same (q), Hetero=Split (p).
5 In Intermediate Phenotype Expression, why does the F2 show a 1:2:1 phenotypic ratio?
Incomplete dominance: Rr ≠ RR or rr. 1 (RR) : 2 (Rr) : 1 (rr). Phenotype matches genotype due to the intermediate nature.
In complete dominance, the heterozygote (Rr) looks like the dominant homozygote (RR), leading to a 3:1 phenotypic ratio. In incomplete dominance, Rr has a distinct intermediate phenotype, meaning every genotype (RR, Rr, rr) creates a distinct phenotype, resulting in a 1:2:1 ratio.
- Option A → Linkage affects inheritance ratios differently, not 1:2:1.
- Option C → Alleles are never lost in incomplete dominance.
- Option D → This is a monogenic trait example.
Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application: Match the cause (unique Rr phenotype) to the effect (1:2:1 ratio).
Final Logic: Genotype-phenotype correspondence in heterozygotes creates the 1:2:1 ratio.
1:2:1 because 2 are intermediate.
6 Which is NOT associated with the Snapdragon Flower Example?
F2 ratio in Snapdragon is 1:2:1. 3:1 is a characteristic of complete dominance. Option B is false.
The F2 generation of an incomplete dominance cross displays a 1:2:1 phenotypic ratio (1 Red : 2 Pink : 1 White). A 3:1 ratio is only found in cases of complete dominance where the heterozygote is indistinguishable from the dominant homozygote.
- Options A, C, and D are accurate descriptions of the snapdragon experiment.
Used: Elimination
Application: Use the phenotypic ratio for Incomplete Dominance to debunk option B.
Final Logic: 1:2:1 is NOT 3:1.
Snapdragon = 1:2:1 (No 3:1).
7
Co-dominance: Both expressed (A and B sugars). Incomplete dominance: Blend (Pink). Difference is "full expression" vs "blend."
The core distinction is that co-dominance results in the simultaneous expression of both parental phenotypes (A and B sugars) without any mixing or blending, whereas incomplete dominance produces a new, intermediate phenotype that is a mixture of the parental traits.
- Option A → Both can occur in many species.
- Option C → Neither strictly follows 3:1 in the heterozygous phenotype manifestation.
- Option D → Masking occurs in complete dominance, not co-dominance.
Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application: Compare the mechanism of co-dominance (both) with incomplete dominance (blend).
Final Logic: "Both expressed" vs "Intermediate blend."
Co-dominance = Cooperation (Both).
8
Gene I has IA, IB, and i. This illustrates multiple alleles.
The ABO system is the classic example of multiple alleles, showing that at the population level, a single gene (Gene I) can exist in three allelic forms (IA, IB, i), which is more than the usual two (diploid) limit.
- Option A → Dominance is not autonomous; IA/IB are co-dominant, IA/i dominant.
- Option C → i is recessive to IA.
- Option D → Four phenotypes are possible (A, B, AB, O).
Used: Elimination
Application: Use the definition of multiple alleles.
Final Logic: Three alleles = Multiple alleles.
3 Alleles = Multiple Allelism.
9 Match the components of Population Level Variation:
| Column-I | Column-II |
|---|---|
| 1. Multiple alleles | p. Found within a single individual |
| 2. Two alleles | q. Found in population studies |
| 3. Three alleles | r. ABO system trio (IA, IB, i) |
| 4. Six genotypes | s. Result of three alleles in a population |
Multiple alleles (1) are matched with the ABO system trio (r). Two alleles (2) are matched with the result of three alleles in a population (s). Three alleles (3) are matched with those found within a single individual (p). Six genotypes (4) are matched with population studies (q).
According to the given matching arrangement: Multiple alleles (1) correspond to the ABO system trio (IA, IB, i) (r). Two alleles (2) correspond to the result of three alleles in a population (s). Three alleles (3) correspond to found within a single individual (p). Six genotypes (4) correspond to found in population studies (q). Thus, the required matching is 1-r, 2-s, 3-p, 4-q, which corresponds to Option C.
- Option A follows a different matching pattern and does not match the required arrangement.
- Option B incorrectly pairs multiple alleles with a single individual.
- Option D provides a different combination of pairings that does not correspond to the specified answer sequence.
Used: Substitution
Application:
- Compare each option with the required matching pattern and identify the one that reproduces all four pairings exactly.
Final Logic:
- Only Option C contains 1-r, 2-s, 3-p, 4-q.
Trio → Result → Individual → Population
10 Arrange the Gene I genotypes from most dominant sugar production to least:
1. ii (No sugar)
2. IA IA (Sugar A)
3. IA IB (Both sugars)
4. IB i (Sugar B)
Most dominant = IAIB (Both sugars). Intermediate = IAIA or IBi (One sugar). Least = ii (None).
Ranked by sugar production quantity/complexity: (3) IAIB produces both A and B sugars (maximum complexity). (2) IAIA and (4) IBi produce only one type of sugar each (A or B, respectively). (1) ii produces no sugar (minimum). Thus, 3 > (2=4) > 1.
- B, C, and D misrepresent the biological sugar production hierarchy.
Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application: Rank based on sugar expression (Both > One > None).
Final Logic: Both sugars > Single sugar > Zero sugar.
Both > One > None.
11 In Two Character Inheritance, if the two genes were tightly linked, how would the results differ from Mendel's?
Independent assortment = Recombinants = Parentals. Linkage = Recombinants < Parentals. Parents stay linked on the chromosome.
Mendel's independent assortment relies on genes being on different chromosomes. Linkage means genes are physically close on the same chromosome and are inherited together. This leads to a significantly higher proportion of parental phenotypes compared to recombinant (non-parental) types.
- Option A → Linkage causes a departure from 9:3:3:1.
- Option C → F1 will still form.
- Option D → Both traits are inherited, but they are linked.
Used: Elimination
Application: Distinguish between the results of Independent Assortment and Linkage.
Final Logic: Linkage = High parental frequency, low recombinant frequency.
Linked = Stick together.
12 Which is NOT associated with the Round-Yellow vs Wrinkled-Green setup?
F1 is Round-Yellow (Dominant traits only). There is no blending. There is no "blue" seed production.
Mendel's work with dihybrids specifically refuted blending inheritance. F1 plants are uniformly Round and Yellow; there is no blending, and definitely no "blue seeds."
- Options A, B, and D are standard pillars of the Mendelian experimental method.
Used: Elimination
Application: Eliminate the statement that contradicts Mendel's core findings (No blending).
Final Logic: Blending = Rejected; Blue = False.
No blending, no blue.
13 How is the 9:3:3:1 ratio analytically related to the Law of Segregation?
9:3:3:1 is the product of (3:1) and (3:1). Each bracket represents the Law of Segregation for one trait.
The Law of Segregation states that each gene pair follows a 3:1 phenotypic ratio. Independent assortment is the simultaneous segregation of two such pairs, which, when multiplied (3:1) * (3:1), yields the 9:3:3:1 ratio.
- Option A → Segregation happens for both.
- Option C → Assortment adds to segregation, it doesn't replace it.
- Option D → Blending does not occur.
Used: Dimensional/Unit Analysis
Application: Decompose 9:3:3:1 into two 3:1 monohybrid components.
Final Logic: 9:3:3:1 = (3:1) × (3:1) (Product of two Segregation events).
Dihybrid = Segregation × Segregation.
14 In the Mathematical Combination Series, what does the (1/4) term in the expansion of (1/2T + 1/2t)^2 represent?
(1/2T + 1/2t)^2 = 1/4TT + 1/2Tt + 1/4tt. 1/4 is the frequency for TT and tt (homozygotes).
When expanding the binomial $(1/2T + 1/2t)^2$, the terms are $1/4TT + 2/4Tt + 1/4tt$. The $1/4$ frequency corresponds to the probability of the homozygous dominant ($TT$) and homozygous recessive ($tt$) genotypes.
- Option A → Probability of heterozygous (Tt) is $2/4$ or $1/2$.
- Option C → Gamete probability is $1/2$.
- Option D → $1/4$ is a frequency, not a total count.
Used: Dimensional/Unit Analysis
Application: Expand the binomial to identify the components.
Final Logic: $1/4 + 2/4 + 1/4 = 1$. $1/4$ = homozygote.
1/4 homozygote (1/4 + 1/4 = 1/2).
15 Arrange the cytological events that explain Independent Pair Segregation:
1. Alignment of two chromosome pairs at the metaphase plate
2. Meiosis I anaphase segregation
3. Formation of four different chromosome combinations in germ cells
4. Independent orientation of different chromosome pairs
Align (1) → Orient independently (4) → Segregate (2) → Resulting combinations (3).
The sequence: Chromosome pairs align at the plate (1). Due to independent orientation (4), they segregate (2) and result in four unique gametic combinations (3).
- B, C, and D misorder the mechanistic steps of Meiosis I.
Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application: Sequence the stages of independent segregation during meiosis.
Final Logic: Align → Orient → Separate → Result.
Align, Orient, Separate, Result.
16 Which is NOT associated with Hybrid Permutation Diversity in RrYy?
Independent assortment means they assort independently. They don't "segregate with" each other. Option D is false.
Independent assortment means that R and r alleles are randomly combined with Y and y alleles. They do not move as a pair (segregating "with" each other).
- Option A, B, and C describe standard, correct Mendelian behavior.
Used: Elimination
Application: Eliminate the statement implying dependent assortment (linkage).
Final Logic: "With" = Linkage; Independent Assortment = Without.
No "with," only "independent."
17 Consider these statements on Graphical Probability Calculation:
I. It results in a square output form.
II. It allows for calculation of genotypic ratios.
III. It was developed to explain chromosomal movement. Which statements are correct?
I: True (It's a square/grid). II: True (Predicts genotypes). III: False (Developed for probability, chromosomal theory came later).
Statements I and II are correct characteristics of the Punnett Square. Statement III is false; the Punnett Square is a statistical/mathematical probability tool, not a cytological model created to explain chromosomal movement (which was the Chromosomal Theory of Inheritance by Sutton and Boveri).
- Options B, C, and D contain the incorrect statement III.
Used: Elimination
Application: Distinguish between statistical probability tools and cytological theories.
Final Logic: Punnett = Probability, not Chromosomal Movement Theory.
Square = Probability calculation.
18 In Zygote Composition Derivation, crossing TtYy x TtYy forms how many different GENOTYPES?
$3 \times 3 = 9$. Punnett square grid has 16 boxes, but only 9 distinct genotype types (e.g., TTYY, TTYy, etc.).
For a dihybrid cross ($TtYy \times TtYy$), the number of genotypic classes is calculated as $3^n$ where $n$ is the number of gene pairs. Since $n=2$, $3^2 = 9$. These represent all possible combinations of the genotypes for T and Y traits.
- Option A, C, and D are mathematically incorrect for a dihybrid genotypic count.
Used: Dimensional/Unit Analysis
Application: Apply the rule $3^n$ for the number of genotypes in a cross.
Final Logic: $3 \times 3 = 9$ distinct genotypes.
$3^2 = 9$.
19 Why is Recessive Parent Crossing analytically superior for genotype determination?
Recessive parent = tt (adds nothing to hide the other). Any "T" from the unknown will appear in the phenotype. This makes it a perfect "test."
In a test cross (unknown x recessive), the recessive parent (tt) provides only recessive alleles. Therefore, whatever allele is present in the unknown parent will be immediately visible in the phenotype of the offspring, making it the most direct way to reveal the hidden genotype.
- Options A, C, and D are not the reasons why the test cross is "analytically superior."
Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application: Define the mechanics of a test cross (revealing the unknown via recessive partner).
Final Logic: Recessive partner contributes zero masking alleles.
Recessive = Reveals the unknown.
20 Which is NOT associated with Unknown Genotype Prediction?
Test cross identifies genotype. It does NOT calculate mutation rates. Option D is irrelevant/wrong.
Unknown genotype prediction (via test cross) identifies whether an individual is homozygous or heterozygous. It does not measure or calculate the mutation rate of genes.
- Option A, B, and C are valid parts of predicting and confirming unknown genotypes.
Used: Elimination
Application: Eliminate the choice that describes a function outside the scope of basic Mendelian testing.
Final Logic: Genotype prediction is not mutation rate calculation.
Genotype =/= Mutation Rate.
