CUET UG Applied Mathematics Booster Test 3 - Determinants and Their Properties
π Answers are locked once submitted β results and explanations appear at the end.
QUESTION 1 OF 20
A functional mapping f: M_n -> R defines the determinant of a matrix A. If matrix A is structured such that m != n (where m represents rows and n represents columns), what is the valid output of the function f(A)?
QUESTION 2 OF 20
Match the specific matrix orders and structures with their rigorous determinant evaluation characteristics.
| List I | List II |
|---|---|
| 1. Matrix Row 1: (x, y), Row 2: (w, z) | a. Evaluation requires computing 3 distinct terms of 2x2 minors. |
| 2. Matrix Row 1: (a) | b. Determinant operation is strictly not possible. |
| 3. Matrix Row 1: (a, b, c), Row 2: (d, e, f), Row 3: (g, h, i) | c. Evaluates instantly to a single term without multiplication. |
| 4. Matrix Row 1: (x, y, z), Row 2: (u, v, w) | d. Evaluates mathematically to exactly xz - yw. |
QUESTION 3 OF 20
Evaluate the conceptual traits of minor M_(ij)for a determinant of order m(where mβ₯2). Which of the following statements hold mathematically true?
1. Deleting the i^(th)row and the j^(th)column reduces the determinant to order (m-1)Γ(m-1).
2. M_(ij)is obtained from the remaining elements while preserving their relative positions.
3. M_(ij)inherently includes the algebraic sign factor (-1)^(i+j).
4. For a 3 Γ 3 determinant, every minor M_(ij)is evaluated by finding the determinant of the remaining 2 Γ 2 matrix.
QUESTION 4 OF 20
In the rigorous algorithmic process of minor calculation, which statement is mathematically INCORRECT?
QUESTION 5 OF 20
In a complex mixture of determinant properties, you are given the minors M_12 = -46 and M_22 = -19 for a 3x3 square matrix. What is the computed algebraic sum of their cofactors A_12 + A_22?
QUESTION 6 OF 20
Under the rigid index constraint region where i != j, what firmly defines the algebraic relationship between the minor M_ij and cofactor A_ij if the specific sum (i+j) evaluates to an odd integer?
QUESTION 7 OF 20
Evaluate the EMI (Equated Matrix Integer) derived from equating two order 2 determinants:
| Row 1: (2x, 4), Row 2: (6, x) | = | Row 1: (2, 4), Row 2: (6, 3) |.
What are the mathematically possible values for x?
QUESTION 8 OF 20
When accurately computing an order 3 determinant via moving expansion strictly along the second row, the correct structural mathematical formula is:
QUESTION 9 OF 20
If all rows and columns of determinant |A| are completely transposed to form |A'|, what is the exact mathematical probability that the equation |A| - |A'| = 0 holds true?
QUESTION 10 OF 20
If three vector rows sequentially shift via two consecutive distinct row interchanges (R1 swapped with R2, then subsequently R2 swapped with R3), what is the final algebraic sign of the determinant compared to its original state?
QUESTION 11 OF 20
If the Area of a geometric triangle formed by coordinates is calculated as exactly 0 using the standard determinant formula (1/2)|A|, what structural definition immediately applies to matrix A?
QUESTION 12 OF 20
For a system to possess an integral unique solution via matrix inversion, it must act as a Non-Singular matrix. If A = | Row 1: (x, 2), Row 2: (1, 2) | is strictly Non-Singular, which condition must x confidently satisfy?
QUESTION 13 OF 20
If two columns of a determinant are perfectly identical, applying the column operation C1 -> C1 - C2 mathematically reduces the entire determinant to zero based fundamentally on which underlying law?
QUESTION 14 OF 20
If all elements comprising the principal diagonal and the entire upper triangular region of a 3x3 matrix are zeroes, what does the determinant evaluate to?
QUESTION 15 OF 20
If R1 = 5 * R3 inside an order 3 determinant, the determinant computes to zero by the Proportionality Rule. This mathematical occurrence is conceptually identical to:
QUESTION 16 OF 20
Applying the transformation R2 -> R2 + kR1 to a determinant D produces a new determinant D'. Which mathematical statement is strictly true regarding their relationship?
QUESTION 17 OF 20
If a square matrix A is of order n=4 and its determinant |A| = 3, what is the exact evaluated value of the determinant |2A| using scalar multiple properties?
QUESTION 18 OF 20
If A and B are square matrices of the exact same order where |A| = -4 and |AB| = 36, calculate the precise determinant of |B'| (the transpose of matrix B).
QUESTION 19 OF 20
If a 3x3 determinant possesses binomials (x+a, y+b, z+c) strictly located in Column 2, and trinomials (p+q+r, s+t+u, v+w+x) strictly in Column 3, how many simple (non-summed) independent determinants can this matrix eventually be split into?
QUESTION 20 OF 20
When the Summation Property splits a determinant along a specific summed row, the strict preservation of mathematical equality relies completely on which of the following maintaining identical placement?
Test Complete!
Answer Review
1 A functional mapping f: M_n -> R defines the determinant of a matrix A. If matrix A is structured such that m != n (where m represents rows and n represents columns), what is the valid output of the function f(A)?
οΏ½οΏ½ Determinants are defined only for square matrices. οΏ½οΏ½ If m β n, the matrix is rectangular. οΏ½οΏ½ Therefore, determinant mapping does not exist.
- A determinant is a scalar quantity associated only with square matrices of order n Γ n. The function f : Mβ β R maps square matrices to real numbers. β If m β n, then the matrix is not square, so determinant evaluation is mathematically undefined. Hence, option C is correct. β Option A is incorrect because determinants are not automatically zero for rectangular matrices. β Option B is incorrect because determinant value 1 applies only to specific matrices like identity matrices. β Option D is incorrect because the sum of diagonal elements represents the trace, not the determinant.
- οΏ½οΏ½ Option A β A rectangular matrix does not have determinant value 0; its determinant is undefined.
- οΏ½οΏ½ Option B β Determinant equals 1 only in special cases such as identity matrices.
- οΏ½οΏ½ Option D β Sum of diagonal entries is the trace of a matrix, not determinant evaluation.
Used: Elimination
Application: Eliminate options giving numerical values because determinants cannot even be computed for non-square matrices.
Final Logic: Since determinant exists only for square matrices, the mapping becomes undefined when m β n.
"Determinant Demands Square."
2 Match the specific matrix orders and structures with their rigorous determinant evaluation characteristics.
| List I | List II |
|---|---|
| 1. Matrix Row 1: (x, y), Row 2: (w, z) | a. Evaluation requires computing 3 distinct terms of 2x2 minors. |
| 2. Matrix Row 1: (a) | b. Determinant operation is strictly not possible. |
| 3. Matrix Row 1: (a, b, c), Row 2: (d, e, f), Row 3: (g, h, i) | c. Evaluates instantly to a single term without multiplication. |
| 4. Matrix Row 1: (x, y, z), Row 2: (u, v, w) | d. Evaluates mathematically to exactly xz - yw. |
οΏ½οΏ½ 2Γ2 determinants use ad β bc. οΏ½οΏ½ 1Γ1 determinant equals the single element. οΏ½οΏ½ Rectangular matrices have no determinant.
- Matrix (1) is a 2Γ2 matrix, so determinant = xz β yw β matches (d). β Matrix (2) is 1Γ1, so determinant equals the single entry a β matches (c). β Matrix (3) is 3Γ3, requiring cofactor expansion with 2Γ2 minors β matches (a). β Matrix (4) is 2Γ3, not square, so determinant is undefined β matches (b). Thus, option A is correct.
- οΏ½οΏ½ Option A β Incorrectly assigns 3Γ3 determinant as single-term evaluation.
- οΏ½οΏ½ Option B β Incorrectly matches 2Γ2 determinant with single-term evaluation.
- οΏ½οΏ½ Option D β Incorrectly claims determinant exists for a 2Γ3 matrix.
Used: Option Grouping
Application: Match each matrix order with its standard determinant rule systematically.
Final Logic: Correct pairing of determinant properties uniquely gives option C.
"2Γ2 β ad β bc."
3 Evaluate the conceptual traits of minor M_(ij)for a determinant of order m(where mβ₯2). Which of the following statements hold mathematically true?
1. Deleting the i^(th)row and the j^(th)column reduces the determinant to order (m-1)Γ(m-1).
2. M_(ij)is obtained from the remaining elements while preserving their relative positions.
3. M_(ij)inherently includes the algebraic sign factor (-1)^(i+j).
4. For a 3 Γ 3 determinant, every minor M_(ij)is evaluated by finding the determinant of the remaining 2 Γ 2 matrix.
οΏ½οΏ½ A minor is obtained by deleting one row and one column. οΏ½οΏ½ The remaining elements retain their relative positions. οΏ½οΏ½ The sign factor belongs to the cofactor, not the minor.
- The minor M_(ij)of an element is the determinant obtained after deleting the i^(th)row and the j^(th)column. β After deleting one row and one column from an mΓm determinant, the remaining determinant is of order (m-1)Γ(m-1). Therefore, Statement 1 is correct. β While forming the minor, the remaining elements retain their original relative positions in the reduced determinant. Hence, Statement 2 is correct. β The algebraic sign factor (-1)^(i+j)is not a part of the minor. It is used only while calculating the cofactor: Aα΅’β±Ό = (-1)^(i+j)Mα΅’β±Ό Therefore, Statement 3 is incorrect. β In a 3 Γ 3 determinant, deleting one row and one column leaves a 2 Γ 2 determinant, which is evaluated using: ad β bc Hence, Statement 4 is correct. β Therefore, Statements 1, 2, and 4 are correct.
- οΏ½οΏ½ Option A β Incorrect because Statement 3 is false; the sign factor belongs to the cofactor.
- οΏ½οΏ½ Option C β Incorrect because Statement 3 is false.
- οΏ½οΏ½ Option D β Incorrect because it includes Statement 3, which is not true.
Used
- Elimination
Application:
- οΏ½οΏ½ Eliminate every option containing Statement 3 because the algebraic sign factor is associated with cofactors, not minors.
Final Logic:
- οΏ½οΏ½ A minor is only the reduced determinant obtained after deleting one row and one column; the sign factor is introduced only while forming the cofactor.
- "Minor = Delete; Cofactor = Delete + Sign."
4 In the rigorous algorithmic process of minor calculation, which statement is mathematically INCORRECT?
οΏ½οΏ½ Minors do not depend on algebraic sign factors. οΏ½οΏ½ Sign factor belongs to cofactors. οΏ½οΏ½ 3Γ3 minors reduce to 2Γ2 determinants.
- A minor is simply the determinant obtained after deleting the relevant row and column. β The sign factor (β1)^(i+j) is associated with cofactors, not minors. Hence, option B is mathematically incorrect. β Option A is correct because deleting one row and column from a 3Γ3 matrix leaves a 2Γ2 determinant. β Option C is correct because Mββ ignores the 3rd row and 2nd column. β Option D is correct because in a 2Γ2 matrix, deleting one row and one column leaves a single remaining element.
- οΏ½οΏ½ Option A β Correctly describes reduction from 3Γ3 to 2Γ2 determinant.
- οΏ½οΏ½ Option C β Properly applies the deletion rule for minors.
- οΏ½οΏ½ Option D β Correctly explains minor evaluation in 2Γ2 matrices.
Used: Odd One Out
Application: Identify the statement confusing minor with cofactor properties.
Final Logic: Only option B incorrectly associates sign factor with minors.
"Minor no sign, Cofactor sign."
5 In a complex mixture of determinant properties, you are given the minors M_12 = -46 and M_22 = -19 for a 3x3 square matrix. What is the computed algebraic sum of their cofactors A_12 + A_22?
οΏ½οΏ½ Cofactor formula is A_ij = (β1)^(i+j) M_ij. οΏ½οΏ½ A_12 changes sign because 1+2 is odd. οΏ½οΏ½ A_22 retains sign because 2+2 is even.
- Cofactor formula: A_(ij)=(-1)^(i+j)M_(ij) β For Mββ = β46: Aββ = (β1)^(1+2)(β46) = (β1)(β46) = 46 β For Mββ = β19: Aββ = (β1)^(2+2)(β19) = (+1)(β19) = β19 β Therefore, Aββ + Aββ = 46 + (β19) = 27 Hence, option C is correct.
- οΏ½οΏ½ Option A β Obtained from incorrect addition without sign consideration.
- οΏ½οΏ½ Option B β Incorrect handling of cofactor signs.
- οΏ½οΏ½ Option D β Uses wrong sign assignment for Aββ.
Used: Substitution
Application: Substitute minor values directly into cofactor formula with parity-based signs.
Final Logic: Correct sign application gives 46 β 19 = 27.
"Odd β negative sign, Even β positive sign."
6 Under the rigid index constraint region where i != j, what firmly defines the algebraic relationship between the minor M_ij and cofactor A_ij if the specific sum (i+j) evaluates to an odd integer?
οΏ½οΏ½ Cofactor formula depends on parity of i+j. οΏ½οΏ½ Odd sum gives negative sign. οΏ½οΏ½ Therefore cofactor becomes negative of minor.
- Cofactor is defined as: A_(ij)=(-1)^(i+j)M_(ij) β If (i+j) is odd, then: (β1)^(odd) = β1 β Therefore: A_ij = βM_ij Hence, option B is correct. β Option A is true only when i+j is even. β Option C has no determinant property support. β Option D is incorrect because cofactors are not necessarily zero.
- οΏ½οΏ½ Option A β Valid only for even parity positions.
- οΏ½οΏ½ Option C β Cofactor is never defined as half the minor.
- οΏ½οΏ½ Option D β Cofactor values depend on minors, not automatic zero.
Used: Substitution
Application: Apply parity condition directly into cofactor sign formula.
Final Logic: Odd exponent gives negative sign, so cofactor equals negative minor.
"Odd index sum β opposite sign."
7 Evaluate the EMI (Equated Matrix Integer) derived from equating two order 2 determinants:
| Row 1: (2x, 4), Row 2: (6, x) | = | Row 1: (2, 4), Row 2: (6, 3) |.
What are the mathematically possible values for x?
οΏ½οΏ½ Evaluate both determinants separately. οΏ½οΏ½ Form an equation in x. οΏ½οΏ½ Solve quadratic equation.
- Left determinant: β£[2x, 4; 6, x]β£=2x^2-24 β Right determinant: β£[2, 4; 6, 3]β£=6-24=-18 β Equating: 2xΒ² β 24 = β18 β 2xΒ² = 6 β xΒ² = 3 β x = Β±β3 Hence, option B is correct.
- οΏ½οΏ½ Option A β Β±3 gives determinant mismatch.
- οΏ½οΏ½ Option C β Β±1 does not satisfy the equation.
- οΏ½οΏ½ Option D β x = 0 gives determinant β24, not β18.
Used: Substitution
Application: Compute determinants using ad β bc and solve resulting equation.
Final Logic: Solving 2xΒ² β 24 = β18 gives x = Β±β3.
"2Γ2 determinant β ad β bc."
8 When accurately computing an order 3 determinant via moving expansion strictly along the second row, the correct structural mathematical formula is:
οΏ½οΏ½ Determinant expansion uses cofactors. οΏ½οΏ½ Cofactor signs in second row are β + β. οΏ½οΏ½ Cofactor form and signed minor form are equivalent.
- Expansion along second row is: a_(21)A_(21)+a_(22)A_(22)+a_(23)A_(23) β Since cofactors already include signs: Aββ = βMββ, Aββ = Mββ, Aββ = βMββ β Therefore: -a_(21)M_(21)+a_(22)M_(22)-a_(23)M_(23) β Thus, options A and C are mathematically equivalent. Hence, option D is correct.
- οΏ½οΏ½ Option A β Correct but incomplete because option D includes its equivalence.
- οΏ½οΏ½ Option B β Incorrect sign pattern for second-row expansion.
- οΏ½οΏ½ Option C β Correct expression but not the most complete option.
Used: Option Grouping
Application: Compare cofactor expansion with signed minor expansion.
Final Logic: Both expressions represent the same determinant expansion.
"Second row signs: β + β."
9 If all rows and columns of determinant |A| are completely transposed to form |A'|, what is the exact mathematical probability that the equation |A| - |A'| = 0 holds true?
οΏ½οΏ½ Determinant remains unchanged under transpose. οΏ½οΏ½ |A| = |A'| always holds. οΏ½οΏ½ Hence difference becomes zero.
- One fundamental determinant property states: β£Aβ£=β£A^'β£ β Therefore: |A| β |Aβ²| = 0 always. β Hence the probability is 100%, making option A correct. β Option B and C are incorrect because there is no uncertainty in this property. β Option D is incorrect because the transpose property holds for all square matrices irrespective of order.
- οΏ½οΏ½ Option B β Determinant equality under transpose is not conditional.
- οΏ½οΏ½ Option C β Difference is never nonzero for transpose property.
- οΏ½οΏ½ Option D β Matrix order does not affect transpose determinant equality.
Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application: Recognize the universal transpose property of determinants.
Final Logic: Since |A| always equals |Aβ²|, the equation always evaluates to zero.
"Transpose keeps determinant same."
10 If three vector rows sequentially shift via two consecutive distinct row interchanges (R1 swapped with R2, then subsequently R2 swapped with R3), what is the final algebraic sign of the determinant compared to its original state?
οΏ½οΏ½ One row interchange changes sign. οΏ½οΏ½ Two interchanges multiply determinant by (β1)Β². οΏ½οΏ½ Final sign becomes original sign.
- Interchanging two rows multiplies determinant by β1. β First interchange: determinant becomes β|A|. β Second interchange: determinant becomes (β1)(β|A|) = |A| β Thus after two swaps, the determinant regains its original sign. Hence, option B is correct. β Option A is incorrect because one sign reversal is canceled by the second interchange. β Option C is incorrect because row interchange alone does not force determinant to zero. β Option D is incorrect because determinants are not squared under swapping.
- οΏ½οΏ½ Option A β True only for a single interchange.
- οΏ½οΏ½ Option C β Zero determinant occurs for dependent rows, not swapping.
- οΏ½οΏ½ Option D β No squaring property exists for row interchange.
Used: Substitution
Application: Apply the sign-change rule twice sequentially.
Final Logic: Two negative sign multiplications restore the original sign.
"Two swaps β sign snaps back."
11 If the Area of a geometric triangle formed by coordinates is calculated as exactly 0 using the standard determinant formula (1/2)|A|, what structural definition immediately applies to matrix A?
Zero area implies determinant equals zero. A matrix with determinant 0 is singular. Singular matrices are non-invertible.
The area of a triangle using determinants is given by: Area=1/2β£Aβ£ If the area equals zero, then: β£Aβ£=0 A matrix whose determinant is zero is called a singular matrix. Option C is correct because determinant zero directly defines singularity. Option A is incorrect because identity matrices have determinant 1. Option B is incorrect because non-singular matrices require non-zero determinant. Option D is incorrect because adjoint matrices are unrelated to determinant zero classification.
- Option A β Identity matrices always have determinant equal to 1.
- Option B β Non-singular matrices satisfy β£Aβ£β 0.
- Option D β Adjoint refers to a matrix operation, not determinant classification.
Used: Elimination
Application: The condition "Area = 0" immediately implies determinant zero, eliminating all non-singular possibilities.
Final Logic: β£Aβ£=0βmatrix is singular.
"Zero area β zero determinant β singular."
12 For a system to possess an integral unique solution via matrix inversion, it must act as a Non-Singular matrix. If A = | Row 1: (x, 2), Row 2: (1, 2) | is strictly Non-Singular, which condition must x confidently satisfy?
Non-singular means determinant is non-zero. Compute determinant of the matrix. Solve condition β£Aβ£β 0.
For the matrix A=β£[x, 2; 1, 2]β£ the determinant is: β£Aβ£=2x-2 For A to be non-singular: 2x-2β 0xβ 1 Option B is correct. Option A makes the determinant zero. Option C is allowed because determinant becomes -2. Option D is unnecessary since x=0 still gives non-zero determinant.
- Option A β x=1 gives determinant zero, making the matrix singular.
- Option C β x=0 still produces a valid non-zero determinant.
- Option D β Non-zero x is not required; only determinant non-zero matters.
Used: Substitution
Application: Evaluate determinant and apply the non-singular condition directly.
Final Logic: 2x-2β 0βxβ 1.
"Non-singular β determinant never zero."
13 If two columns of a determinant are perfectly identical, applying the column operation C1 -> C1 - C2 mathematically reduces the entire determinant to zero based fundamentally on which underlying law?
Identical columns become a zero column after subtraction. Determinant with a zero column equals zero. Operation uses zero row/column property.
If two columns are identical and we apply: C_1βC_1-C_2 then every entry in C_1 becomes zero. A determinant containing an entire zero row or column evaluates to zero. Thus, the result fundamentally relies on the Zero Row/Column Rule. Option B is correct. Option A identifies the original condition but not the operational rule used after subtraction. Option C concerns proportional rows/columns. Option D changes sign only during interchange.
- Option A β Identical columns imply zero determinant, but the operation specifically creates a zero column.
- Option C β Proportionality is not directly applied here.
- Option D β Switching rows/columns only changes sign.
Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application: The operation explicitly creates a zero column, pointing directly to the zero-column property.
Final Logic: Zero column formed β determinant becomes zero.
"Zero row or column kills determinant."
14 If all elements comprising the principal diagonal and the entire upper triangular region of a 3x3 matrix are zeroes, what does the determinant evaluate to?
Matrix becomes triangular. Determinant equals product of diagonal entries. Zero diagonal entries force determinant zero.
For triangular matrices, the determinant equals the product of the principal diagonal elements. Since all diagonal elements are zero: β£Aβ£=0Γ0Γ0=0 Option A is correct. Option B and Option C are impossible because determinant is clearly zero. Option D is incorrect because lower triangular entries do not affect this conclusion.
- Option B β Determinant cannot become 1 with zero diagonal entries.
- Option C β No sign property produces -1 here.
- Option D β Triangular determinant depends only on diagonal elements.
Used: Elimination
Application: Recognize triangular determinant property immediately.
Final Logic: Zero diagonal product β determinant zero.
"Triangular matrix β multiply diagonals."
15 If R1 = 5 * R3 inside an order 3 determinant, the determinant computes to zero by the Proportionality Rule. This mathematical occurrence is conceptually identical to:
Proportional rows are linearly dependent. Factoring out scalar makes rows identical. Identical rows force determinant zero.
If R_1=5R_3 then factor 5 from R_1: β£Aβ£=5Γ(determinantΒ withΒ R_1=R_3) Now two rows become identical, making the determinant zero. Option A is correct. Option B changes row values incorrectly. Option C ignores row dependence. Option D does not affect proportionality.
- Option B β Adding a scalar to a row is not determinant proportionality.
- Option C β Determinant is not merely multiplied by 5 here.
- Option D β Transposition preserves determinant value but does not explain zero result.
Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application: Interpret proportional rows through scalar factoring.
Final Logic: Proportional rows β identical rows after factoring β determinant zero.
"Proportional rows become same rows."
16 Applying the transformation R2 -> R2 + kR1 to a determinant D produces a new determinant D'. Which mathematical statement is strictly true regarding their relationship?
Adding a multiple of one row to another preserves determinant. Elementary row replacement does not change value. Determinant remains invariant.
One of the key determinant properties states: Replacing a row by itself plus a multiple of another row leaves the determinant unchanged. Thus: R_2βR_2+kR_1 implies: D^'=D Option C is correct. Option A incorrectly assumes multiplication scaling. Option B is not a determinant property. Option D has no mathematical basis.
- Option A β Scaling occurs only when a whole row is multiplied.
- Option B β Determinants are not altered additively.
- Option D β No division property applies.
Used: Substitution
Application: Apply the standard row operation rule directly.
Final Logic: Row replacement operation leaves determinant unchanged.
"Row replace, determinant stays."
17 If a square matrix A is of order n=4 and its determinant |A| = 3, what is the exact evaluated value of the determinant |2A| using scalar multiple properties?
Determinant scales by k^n. Here k=2 and n=4. Multiply 2^4 with determinant 3.
For an nΓn matrix: β£kAβ£=k^nβ£Aβ£ Given: n=4,k=2,β£Aβ£=3 So: β£2Aβ£=2^4Γ3=16Γ3=48 Option C is correct. Option A incorrectly scales linearly. Option B partially scales. Option D incorrectly cubes the determinant.
- Option A β Uses only single multiplication by 2.
- Option B β Uses incomplete power scaling.
- Option D β No cubic relation exists.
Used: Substitution
Application: Apply the determinant scaling formula k^nβ£Aβ£.
Final Logic: 2^4Γ3=48.
"Order n β scale by kβΏ."
18 If A and B are square matrices of the exact same order where |A| = -4 and |AB| = 36, calculate the precise determinant of |B'| (the transpose of matrix B).
Use β£ABβ£=β£Aβ£β£Bβ£. Transpose preserves determinant. Solve for β£Bβ£.
Given: β£ABβ£=β£Aβ£β£Bβ£36=(-4)β£Bβ£β£Bβ£=-9 Also: β£B^'β£=β£Bβ£ Therefore: β£B^'β£=-9 Option A is correct. Option B ignores the negative sign. Option C multiplies incorrectly. Option D incorrectly divides.
- Option B β Determinant sign is lost incorrectly.
- Option C β Product rule misapplied.
- Option D β Reciprocal rule does not apply.
Used: Substitution
Application: Use determinant product and transpose properties sequentially.
Final Logic: β£Bβ£=36/(-4)=-9, and transpose preserves determinant.
"Transpose keeps determinant same."
19
If a 3x3 determinant possesses binomials (x+a, y+b, z+c) strictly located in Column 2, and trinomials (p+q+r, s+t+u, v+w+x) strictly in Column 3, how many simple (non-summed) independent determinants can this matrix eventually be split into?
Binomial column splits into 2 determinants. Trinomial column splits into 3 determinants. Total splits multiply: 2Γ3=6.
The determinant summation property allows splitting along summed columns. Column 2 has binomials β 2 determinant components. Column 3 has trinomials β 3 determinant components. Total independent determinants: 2Γ3=6 Option D is correct. Option A ignores one column split. Option B considers only the trinomial split. Option C incorrectly adds instead of multiplying.
- Option A β Only one split considered.
- Option B β Ignores binomial contribution.
- Option C β Splits combine multiplicatively, not additively.
Used: Option Grouping
Application: Treat each column split independently and multiply total combinations.
Final Logic: 2Γ3=6 determinants.
"Independent splits multiply."
20
When the Summation Property splits a determinant along a specific summed row, the strict preservation of mathematical equality relies completely on which of the following maintaining identical placement?
Only summed row/column changes. Remaining rows/columns stay unchanged. Equality depends on structural preservation.
In determinant splitting: The row/column containing sums is separated. All other rows and columns remain exactly identical in every split determinant. This preservation ensures algebraic equality. Option B is correct. Option A is too restrictive. Option C concerns expansion, not splitting. Option D is unrelated.
- Option A β Equality depends on all non-summed elements, not only diagonal entries.
- Option C β Cofactors are unrelated to structural duplication.
- Option D β Scalar multipliers are not the key preservation factor.
Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application: Focus on the phrase "maintaining identical placement."
Final Logic: Non-summed rows/columns must remain unchanged across all split determinants.
"Only summed row changes."
