CUET UG Accountancy Booster Test 3 Modes of Dissolution of Partnership Firm -

🚀

CUET UG Accountancy Booster Test 2 Modes of Dissolution of Partnership Firm

⏱️ 30 Minutes

❓ 20 Questions

📌 Answers are locked once submitted — results and explanations appear at the end.

CUET UG Accountancy Booster Test 2 Modes of Dissolution of Partnership Firm

1 / 20

QUESTION 1 OF 20

Evaluate the following statements regarding a change in the existing profit-sharing ratio:
I. It brings an end to the existence of the firm.
II. The firm may continue its business as before.
III. It results in the dissolution of partnership.

Answer Review

1 Evaluate the following statements regarding a change in the existing profit-sharing ratio:
I. It brings an end to the existence of the firm.
II. The firm may continue its business as before.
III. It results in the dissolution of partnership.

A I and II only

B I and III only

C II and III only

D I, II, and III

💡 Short Explanation

Change in ratio causes reconstitution. Firm continues business. Partnership relation changes.

✅ Correct Answer Explanation

When the profit-sharing ratio changes, the relationship among partners changes, leading to dissolution of the old partnership agreement. However, the firm itself may continue its operations without interruption. Therefore: Statement II is correct because business continues. Statement III is correct because partnership is reconstituted. Statement I is incorrect because the firm itself does not end. Hence, Option C is correct.

❓ Why Other Options Are Incorrect

Option A → Statement III is also correct.
Option B → Statement I is incorrect.
Option D → The firm does not cease to exist.

🎯 Strategy

Used

Elimination

Application:

�� Eliminate statements confusing dissolution of partnership with dissolution of firm.

Final Logic:

�� Partnership changes, but the firm continues.

🧠 Memory Trick

"Ratio changes relation, not business."

📚 Class XII – Accountancy Part 1 – Chapter: Dissolution and Reconstitution – Topic: Change in Profit-Sharing Ratio – Page X

2 Assertion (A): The admission of a new partner inevitably involves the dissolution of the firm.
Reason (R): Admission changes the existing relationship between the partners resulting in the dissolution of partnership.

A Both A and R are true, and R explains A.

B Both A and R are true, but R does not explain A.

C A is true, but R is false.

D A is false, but R is true.

💡 Short Explanation

Admission changes partnership relation. Firm itself may continue. Only partnership dissolves.

✅ Correct Answer Explanation

Admission of a new partner changes the existing agreement among partners and therefore causes dissolution of partnership (reconstitution), not dissolution of the firm itself. Thus: Assertion is false because the firm does not inevitably dissolve. Reason is true because admission changes the economic relationship among partners. Hence, Option D is correct.

❓ Why Other Options Are Incorrect

Option A → Assertion is false.
Option B → Assertion itself is incorrect.
Option C → Reason is true.

🎯 Strategy

Used

Contextual/Tonal Matching

Application:

�� Distinguish partnership dissolution from firm dissolution.

Final Logic:

�� Admission changes relationship, not existence of firm.

🧠 Memory Trick

"New partner, same firm."

📚 Class XII – Accountancy Part 1 – Chapter: Admission of a Partner – Topic: Reconstitution of Partnership – Page X

3 Match the reconstitution/dissolution events with their respective consequences:

List 1	List 2
1. Retirement of a Partner	a. Dissolution of Partnership
2. Firm's liabilities exceed assets and all partners are insolvent	b. Compulsory Dissolution
3. Court finds a partner permanently incapable	c. Dissolution by Court
4. Expiry of fixed period	d. Contingent Dissolution

A 1-b, 2-a, 3-d, 4-c

B 1-a, 2-b, 3-c, 4-d

C 1-c, 2-d, 3-a, 4-b

D 1-d, 2-c, 3-b, 4-a

💡 Short Explanation

Retirement causes reconstitution. Insolvency may cause compulsory dissolution. Court incapacity leads to court dissolution.

✅ Correct Answer Explanation

Correct matching: 1. Retirement of partner → Dissolution of partnership 2. Insolvency of all partners → Compulsory dissolution 3. Permanent incapacity → Dissolution by Court 4. Expiry of fixed period → Contingent dissolution Thus, Option A is correct.

❓ Why Other Options Are Incorrect

Option B → Incorrect pairing of retirement and compulsory dissolution.
Option C → Incorrect linkage of expiry and dissolution.
Option D → Multiple mismatches.

🎯 Strategy

Used

Option Grouping

Application:

�� Match each legal situation with its category.

Final Logic:

�� Only Option A correctly aligns all events.

🧠 Memory Trick

"Retire–Reconstitute, Insolvent–Compulsory."

📚 Class XII – Accountancy Part 1 – Chapter: Dissolution of Partnership Firm – Topic: Types of Dissolution – Page X

4 If a partner dies, but the partnership deed contains a specific clause that the firm will continue with the remaining partners, what is the legal standing of the firm?

A The firm is compulsorily dissolved regardless of the deed.

B The firm continues, and only the partnership is dissolved.

C The firm must be dissolved by the court.

D The business becomes illegal.

💡 Short Explanation

Death dissolves old partnership relation. Firm may continue if deed permits. Business does not automatically end.

✅ Correct Answer Explanation

Death of a partner ordinarily dissolves the partnership agreement. However, if the partnership deed contains a clause allowing continuation, the remaining partners may continue the business. Thus, only the old partnership relationship ends while the firm continues. Hence, Option B is correct.

❓ Why Other Options Are Incorrect

Option A → Deed provisions are legally valid.
Option C → Court intervention is unnecessary.
Option D → Death does not make business illegal.

🎯 Strategy

Used

Elimination

Application:

�� Remove options involving unnecessary court or illegality.

Final Logic:

�� Deed provisions permit continuation.

🧠 Memory Trick

"Death ends relation, not always business."

📚 Class XII – Accountancy Part 1 – Chapter: Retirement and Death of a Partner – Topic: Continuation Clause – Page X

5 A firm consists of partners A, B, and C. A and B are declared insolvent by the court, rendering them incompetent to sign a contract, leaving only C. What is the immediate consequence for the firm?

A Dissolution by Agreement

B Dissolution by Notice

C Compulsory Dissolution

D Contingent Dissolution

💡 Short Explanation

Insolvent partners cannot contract. Partnership requires at least two competent persons. Firm dissolves compulsorily.

✅ Correct Answer Explanation

When all partners except one become insolvent, the partnership cannot legally continue because at least two competent persons are required for a partnership. Therefore, the firm undergoes compulsory dissolution. Hence, Option C is correct.

❓ Why Other Options Are Incorrect

Option A → No mutual agreement involved.
Option B → Not a notice-based dissolution.
Option D → Insolvency is not a contingency event.

🎯 Strategy

Used

Elimination

Application:

�� Identify legal impossibility of continuation.

Final Logic:

�� One competent partner alone cannot constitute a partnership.

🧠 Memory Trick

"One partner alone = no partnership."

📚 Class XII – Accountancy Part 1 – Chapter: Compulsory Dissolution – Topic: Insolvency of Partners – Page X

6 In the context of the economic relationship between partners, what is the fundamental difference between the dissolution of a partnership and the dissolution of a firm?

A In firm dissolution, it changes form; in partnership dissolution, it ends.

B It remains unchanged in both scenarios.

C It ends completely in both scenarios.

D In partnership dissolution, it continues in a changed form; in firm dissolution, it comes to an end.

💡 Short Explanation

Reconstitution changes relationship. Firm dissolution ends business completely. Partnership dissolution may continue business.

✅ Correct Answer Explanation

Dissolution of partnership means a change in relationship among partners while the business may continue. Dissolution of firm means complete termination of business and closure of accounts. Therefore, Option D is correct.

❓ Why Other Options Are Incorrect

Option A → Concepts are reversed.
Option B → Relationship changes in both cases.
Option C → Partnership dissolution may not end business.

🎯 Strategy

Used

Odd One Out

Application:

�� Distinguish continuation from termination.

Final Logic:

�� Firm dissolution ends the entity permanently.

🧠 Memory Trick

"Partnership changes; firm finishes."

📚 Class XII – Accountancy Part 1 – Chapter: Dissolution of Partnership Firm – Topic: Difference between Dissolution of Partnership and Firm – Page X

7 The dissolution rule regarding the "completion of the venture" is explicitly subject to which overarching condition?

A It is subject to a contract between the partners.

B It is subject to the approval of the Registrar.

C It is subject to public notice.

D It is subject to court intervention.

💡 Short Explanation

Partnership agreement governs contingencies. Contract may alter dissolution rules. Completion of venture is contingent dissolution.

✅ Correct Answer Explanation

Under contingent dissolution, completion of a specific venture dissolves the firm unless partners agree otherwise through a contract. Thus, dissolution is subject to agreement among partners. Hence, Option A is correct.

❓ Why Other Options Are Incorrect

Option B → Registrar approval unnecessary.
Option C → Public notice is not determining factor.
Option D → Court intervention not required.

🎯 Strategy

Used

Contextual/Tonal Matching

Application:

�� Relate dissolution rules to partnership agreement.

Final Logic:

�� Contract overrides default dissolution rule.

🧠 Memory Trick

"Contract controls contingency."

📚 Class XII – Accountancy Part 1 – Chapter: Dissolution on Happening of Contingencies – Topic: Completion of Venture – Page X

8 Arrange the sequence of logic for a contingent dissolution due to expiry of time:
I. Expiry of the 5-year term.
II. Firm is dissolved automatically.
III. Partners create a firm constituted for a fixed term of 5 years.
IV. No contract to the contrary exists between partners regarding extension.

A I, II, III, IV

B III, IV, I, II

C IV, III, I, II

D III, I, IV, II

💡 Short Explanation

Firm formed for fixed term. No contrary agreement exists. Expiry causes automatic dissolution.

✅ Correct Answer Explanation

Correct sequence: 1. Partners form a firm for fixed term. 2. No extension agreement exists. 3. Fixed period expires. 4. Firm dissolves automatically. Thus: III → IV → I → II Hence, Option B is correct.

❓ Why Other Options Are Incorrect

Option A → Formation must occur first.
Option C → No agreement comes after formation.
Option D → Expiry occurs after contract condition.

🎯 Strategy

Used

Sequential Logic

Application:

�� Follow legal chronology of contingent dissolution.

Final Logic:

�� Expiry after fixed term leads to dissolution.

🧠 Memory Trick

"Create → No extension → Expire → Dissolve."

📚 Class XII – Accountancy Part 1 – Chapter: Contingent Dissolution – Topic: Expiry of Fixed Period – Page X

9 Upon complete termination, a firm realizes Rs. 100,000 from assets. Outside liabilities are Rs. 60,000, and partners' advances (loans) are Rs. 50,000. How are the outside liabilities and partners' loans treated during settlement?

A Partners' loans are paid first entirely.

B Outside liabilities and partners' loans are paid proportionately.

C Outside liabilities (Rs. 60,000) are paid first, leaving Rs. 40,000 to be paid proportionately towards partners' loans.

D The Rs. 100,000 is distributed to capital accounts directly.

💡 Short Explanation

External liabilities get priority. Partner loans are paid afterward. Remaining cash distributed proportionately.

✅ Correct Answer Explanation

According to Section 48: 1. Outside liabilities are settled first. 2. Then partners' loans are paid. 3. Capital accounts are settled last. Calculation: Assets realized = Rs. 100,000 Outside liabilities = Rs. 60,000 Remaining = Rs. 40,000 This Rs. 40,000 is used toward partner loans. Hence, Option C is correct.

❓ Why Other Options Are Incorrect

Option A → Outside liabilities always get priority.
Option B → Payments are not proportional initially.
Option D → External claims must be settled first.

🎯 Strategy

Used

Substitution

Application:

�� Apply Section 48 settlement order.

Final Logic:

�� Outside liabilities are cleared before partner loans.

🧠 Memory Trick

"Outsiders first, insiders later."

📚 Class XII – Accountancy Part 1 – Chapter: Dissolution of Partnership Firm – Topic: Settlement of Accounts – Page X

10 Which of the following statements accurately reflect the legal closure of a firm under the Partnership Act 1932?
I. It requires the breaking of the relationship between all partners.
II. The business can still be transacted indefinitely.
III. It necessarily brings in dissolution of the partnership.

A I and II only

B II and III only

C I only

D I and III only

💡 Short Explanation

Dissolution breaks all relationships. Partnership dissolves completely. Business cannot continue indefinitely.

✅ Correct Answer Explanation

Dissolution of firm means complete legal closure of the business and termination of relationship among all partners. Thus: Statement I is correct. Statement III is correct. Statement II is incorrect because business operations end. Hence, Option D is correct.

❓ Why Other Options Are Incorrect

Option A → Statement II is false.
Option B → Statement II incorrect.
Option C → Statement III also correct.

🎯 Strategy

Used

Elimination

Application:

�� Remove statements inconsistent with complete closure.

Final Logic:

�� Firm dissolution terminates business entirely.

🧠 Memory Trick

"Firm dissolved = business closed."

📚 Class XII – Accountancy Part 1 – Chapter: Dissolution of Partnership Firm – Topic: Meaning of Dissolution – Page X

11 Assertion (A): A highly successful and completely solvent firm can be legally dissolved if all partners consent.
Reason (R): A firm may be dissolved with the consent of all the partners under Dissolution by Agreement.

A Both A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation of A.

B Both A and R are true, but R is not the correct explanation of A.

C A is true, but R is false.

D A is false, but R is true.

💡 Short Explanation

Mutual consent can dissolve any firm. Profitability does not prevent dissolution. Dissolution by agreement is legally valid.

✅ Correct Answer Explanation

A partnership firm may be dissolved at any time if all partners mutually agree, regardless of whether the firm is profitable or solvent. This is called Dissolution by Agreement under the Partnership Act. Therefore: Assertion is true. Reason is true. Reason correctly explains the Assertion. Hence, Option A is correct.

❓ Why Other Options Are Incorrect

Option B → Reason directly explains Assertion.
Option C → Reason is true.
Option D → Assertion is also true.

🎯 Strategy

Used

Contextual/Tonal Matching

Application:

�� Relate dissolution rules to mutual consent principles.

Final Logic:

�� Consent of all partners is sufficient for dissolution.

🧠 Memory Trick

"Mutual consent ends partnership."

📚 Class XII – Accountancy Part 1 – Chapter: Dissolution by Agreement – Topic: Mutual Consent – Page X

12 If partners have a contract stating the firm will dissolve if their prime supplier goes bankrupt, and the supplier does go bankrupt, the dissolution does not require a court order. Is this correct?

A No, all dissolutions require a court order.

B Yes, this is dissolution in accordance with a contract between partners.

C No, this is classified as a compulsory dissolution.

D Yes, but only if they are a partnership at will.

💡 Short Explanation

Contract terms may determine dissolution. Court order is unnecessary. This is contingent dissolution.

✅ Correct Answer Explanation

If partners agree in advance that the firm will dissolve on occurrence of a specific event, dissolution automatically occurs when that event happens. This is dissolution according to contract terms between partners. Therefore, court intervention is not required. Hence, Option B is correct.

❓ Why Other Options Are Incorrect

Option A → Many dissolutions occur without court order.
Option C → Supplier bankruptcy does not create compulsory dissolution.
Option D → Applies beyond partnership at will.

🎯 Strategy

Used

Elimination

Application:

�� Remove options incorrectly requiring court intervention.

Final Logic:

�� Contractual contingencies legally dissolve the firm.

🧠 Memory Trick

"Contract controls dissolution."

📚 Class XII – Accountancy Part 1 – Chapter: Dissolution by Agreement – Topic: Contractual Dissolution – Page X

13 In a firm of four partners, three are adjudicated insolvent. The fourth partner wishes to continue the firm by admitting new partners immediately to avoid closing. Can the firm continue without dissolution?

A Yes, one solvent partner is enough to continue the old firm without dissolution.

B Yes, if the insolvent partners provide capital.

C No, the firm is dissolved compulsorily when all but one partner become insolvent.

D No, because it requires mutual consent to continue.

💡 Short Explanation

Partnership requires minimum two competent persons. Insolvent persons cannot contract. Firm dissolves compulsorily.

✅ Correct Answer Explanation

When all partners except one become insolvent, the partnership legally ceases because only one competent partner remains. A valid partnership requires at least two competent persons. Therefore, compulsory dissolution occurs immediately. Hence, Option C is correct.

❓ Why Other Options Are Incorrect

Option A → One partner alone cannot continue old firm.
Option B → Insolvent partners are legally incompetent.
Option D → Main issue is legal impossibility, not consent.

🎯 Strategy

Used

Elimination

Application:

�� Apply legal requirement of minimum competent partners.

Final Logic:

�� One competent partner cannot sustain partnership.

🧠 Memory Trick

"One alone cannot partner."

📚 Class XII – Accountancy Part 1 – Chapter: Compulsory Dissolution – Topic: Insolvency of Partners – Page X

14 Which of the following directly triggers the compulsory dissolution of a partnership firm?

A A partner seeking early retirement.

B The firm running in losses for one year.

C A partner transferring 10% of his interest to his son.

D The business of the firm becoming illegal due to a new government policy.

💡 Short Explanation

Illegal business cannot continue legally. Law forces dissolution. This creates compulsory dissolution.

✅ Correct Answer Explanation

When the business of the firm becomes unlawful due to legal or government changes, the firm must compulsorily dissolve because illegal activities cannot continue under law. Hence, Option D is correct.

❓ Why Other Options Are Incorrect

Option A → Retirement causes reconstitution.
Option B → Losses alone do not automatically dissolve firm.
Option C → Transfer may become court ground, not compulsory dissolution.

🎯 Strategy

Used

Odd One Out

Application:

�� Identify the legally prohibited circumstance.

Final Logic:

�� Illegality immediately ends partnership operations.

🧠 Memory Trick

"Illegal business = compulsory closure."

📚 Class XII – Accountancy Part 1 – Chapter: Compulsory Dissolution – Topic: Illegal Business – Page X

15 "Subject to contract between the partners, a firm is dissolved if constituted for a fixed term, by the expiry of that term." This rule is an exact example of:

A Dissolution on the happening of certain contingencies

B Compulsory Dissolution

C Dissolution by Court

D Dissolution by Notice

💡 Short Explanation

Expiry of fixed term is a contingency. Dissolution occurs automatically. Subject to partner agreement.

✅ Correct Answer Explanation

A partnership formed for a fixed period dissolves automatically on expiry of that period unless partners agree otherwise. This is dissolution on happening of contingencies. Hence, Option A is correct.

❓ Why Other Options Are Incorrect

Option B → No legal prohibition exists.
Option C → Court intervention unnecessary.
Option D → No written notice involved.

🎯 Strategy

Used

Contextual/Tonal Matching

Application:

�� Match legal wording with dissolution category.

Final Logic:

�� Expiry of fixed term is contingent dissolution.

🧠 Memory Trick

"Fixed term finishes automatically."

📚 Class XII – Accountancy Part 1 – Chapter: Contingent Dissolution – Topic: Expiry of Term – Page X

16 Match the scenario with the accurate dissolution category:

List 1	List 2
1. Completion of a Specific Venture	a. Contingent Dissolution
2. Business becomes illegal	b. Compulsory Dissolution
3. All partners give consent	c. Dissolution by Agreement
4. Written notice in Partnership at Will	d. Dissolution by Notice

A 1-b, 2-c, 3-d, 4-a

B 1-c, 2-a, 3-b, 4-d

C 1-a, 2-b, 3-c, 4-d

D 1-d, 2-c, 3-b, 4-a

💡 Short Explanation

Venture completion is contingent. Illegal business causes compulsory dissolution. Mutual consent creates agreement dissolution.

✅ Correct Answer Explanation

Correct matching: 1. Completion of venture → Contingent dissolution 2. Business illegal → Compulsory dissolution 3. All partners consent → Dissolution by Agreement 4. Written notice → Dissolution by Notice Thus, Option B is correct.

❓ Why Other Options Are Incorrect

Option A → Multiple incorrect matches.
Option C → Venture completion wrongly classified.
Option D → Illegality mismatch.

🎯 Strategy

Used

Option Grouping

Application:

�� Match dissolution circumstances with categories.

Final Logic:

�� Only Option B correctly aligns all categories.

🧠 Memory Trick

"Venture–Contingent, Illegal–Compulsory."

📚 Class XII – Accountancy Part 1 – Chapter: Types of Dissolution – Topic: Classification of Dissolution – Page X

17 In a partnership at will with 5 partners, how many partners must strictly give written notice to signify the intention of seeking dissolution of the firm?

A All 5 partners

B At least 3 partners (majority)

C Any 1 of the partners

D Exactly 2 partners

💡 Short Explanation

Partnership at will allows notice dissolution. One partner's written notice is sufficient. Majority approval unnecessary.

✅ Correct Answer Explanation

Under dissolution by notice, any one partner in a partnership at will can dissolve the firm by giving written notice to the other partners. Therefore, Option C is correct.

❓ Why Other Options Are Incorrect

Option A → Unanimous notice unnecessary.
Option B → Majority rule does not apply.
Option D → Exact number requirement absent.

🎯 Strategy

Used

Elimination

Application:

�� Remove options requiring unnecessary consensus.

Final Logic:

�� Single written notice legally dissolves the firm.

🧠 Memory Trick

"One notice ends partnership at will."

📚 Class XII – Accountancy Part 1 – Chapter: Dissolution by Notice – Topic: Partnership at Will – Page X

18 True or False: In a fixed-term partnership, a single partner can dissolve the firm at any time before the term expires simply by giving a written notice to the other partners.

A True, because any partner can dissolve a firm.

B True, if the partner holds the majority of capital.

C False, notice can only be given verbally.

D False, this provision only applies to a partnership at will.

💡 Short Explanation

Written notice applies only to partnership at will. Fixed-term firms cannot dissolve this way. Contract duration must be respected.

✅ Correct Answer Explanation

Dissolution by notice is available only in partnership at will. In fixed-term partnerships, partners cannot unilaterally dissolve the firm before expiry merely through written notice. Hence, Option D is correct.

❓ Why Other Options Are Incorrect

Option A → Not applicable to fixed-term firms.
Option B → Capital majority irrelevant.
Option C → Notice must be written, not verbal.

🎯 Strategy

Used

Contextual/Tonal Matching

Application:

�� Connect notice dissolution with partnership at will.

Final Logic:

�� Fixed-term agreements restrict unilateral dissolution.

🧠 Memory Trick

"Notice works only at will."

📚 Class XII – Accountancy Part 1 – Chapter: Dissolution by Notice – Topic: Fixed-Term vs Partnership at Will – Page X

📄 Passage

"At the suit of a partner, the court may order a partnership firm to be dissolved on any of the following grounds: (c) when a partner is guilty of misconduct which is likely to adversely affect the business of the firm; (d) when a partner persistently commits breach of partnership agreement; (f) when the business of the firm cannot be carried on except at a loss..."

Based on the passage, who must initiate the process for the court to order dissolution on grounds of misconduct?

A At the suit of a partner

B At the suit of a creditor

C By the court's own direct observation

D By an auditor's report

💡 Short Explanation

Court acts upon partner's suit. Misconduct must be legally challenged. External persons cannot directly initiate.

✅ Correct Answer Explanation

The passage clearly states: "At the suit of a partner…" This means a partner must approach the court seeking dissolution. The court does not automatically intervene. Hence, Option A is correct.

❓ Why Other Options Are Incorrect

Option B → Creditors cannot initiate dissolution on these grounds.
Option C → Court does not act independently.
Option D → Auditor report alone insufficient.

🎯 Strategy

Used

Contextual/Tonal Matching

Application:

�� Focus on explicit legal wording in passage.

Final Logic:

�� Partner initiates the legal process.

🧠 Memory Trick

"Partner sues for court dissolution."

📚 Class XII – Accountancy Part 1 – Chapter: Dissolution by Court – Topic: Court Intervention – Page X

📄 Passage

According to the passage, what level of breach of the partnership agreement legally justifies a court-ordered dissolution?

A An accidental, one-time breach.

B A persistent breach of the agreement.

C Any minor breach regardless of intent.

D A breach that does not affect the firm's profits.

💡 Short Explanation

Persistent breach destroys trust. Court intervention requires serious misconduct. Minor accidental breaches insufficient.

✅ Correct Answer Explanation

The passage explicitly mentions: "Persistently commits breach of partnership agreement." This means repeated or continuous violation of the agreement justifies court dissolution. Therefore, Option B is correct.

❓ Why Other Options Are Incorrect

Option A → One-time accidental breach insufficient.
Option C → Minor breaches may not justify dissolution.
Option D → Serious effect on partnership required.

🎯 Strategy

Used

Elimination

Application:

�� Identify the legally significant degree of breach.

Final Logic:

�� Persistent violation justifies court dissolution.

🧠 Memory Trick

"Repeated breach breaks partnership."

📚 Class XII – Accountancy Part 1 – Chapter: Dissolution by Court – Topic: Persistent Breach – Page X

CUET UG Accountancy Booster Test 2 Modes of Dissolution of Partnership Firm

Test Complete!

Answer Review