CUET UG Accountancy Booster Test 1 Reconstitution Basics
📌 Answers are locked once submitted — results and explanations appear at the end.
QUESTION 1 OF 20
If an agreement exists between X and Y to share the profits of a business, but only X actively manages it on behalf of both, does this still satisfy the concept of a partnership?
QUESTION 2 OF 20
Assertion (A): If partners decide to change their profit-sharing ratio from 3:2 to 1:1, the firm itself is completely dissolved.
Reason (R): Any change in the existing agreement amounts to reconstitution, leading to a new agreement, not the dissolution of the firm's business.
QUESTION 3 OF 20
Hari and Haqque are partners sharing profits 3:2. They admit John for a 1/6 share. In terms of reconstitution, what effectively happens to the old 3:2 agreement?
QUESTION 4 OF 20
Which of the following events strictly lead to a change in the partnership agreement (reconstitution)?
I. Admission of a partner
II. Change in profit sharing ratio
III. Buying a new heavy machinery
IV. Retirement of a partner
QUESTION 5 OF 20
Even though reconstitution results in a changed relationship among the members and ends the old agreement, what happens to the firm's business operations?
QUESTION 6 OF 20
Match the firm reconstitution event with the resulting change in relationship:
| List 1 | List 2 |
|---|---|
| 1. Admission | a. Remaining partners continue sharing future profits after a partner passes away |
| 2. Retirement | b. A partner withdraws due to old age or illness, leaving fewer partners |
| 3. Change in Ratio | c. New partner supplements resources, acquiring a share from old partners |
| 4. Death | d. Existing partners alter shares due to changed roles without adding/removing members |
QUESTION 7 OF 20
Anil and Vishal share profits in 3:2. They admit Sumit for 1/5 share. If Sumit acquires his share from old partners in their old ratio, what is Anil's new calculated share?
QUESTION 8 OF 20
Ram, Mohan, and Sohan share in 3:2:1. Sohan brings additional capital, and they change the ratio to equal shares (1:1:1). What is the fractional gain calculated for Sohan?
QUESTION 9 OF 20
If a partnership is strictly "at will," under what timeline can an existing partner legally choose to retire?
QUESTION 10 OF 20
X, Y, and Z share profits 3:2:1. X dies. Y and Z decide to carry on the business equally. What is the immediate accounting implication for the firm's structure?
QUESTION 11 OF 20
Identify the correct sequence of logical/structural steps for legally admitting a partner:
1. Existing partners unanimously agree to the admission.
2. New partner brings capital and/or goodwill.
3. Old agreement ends, new agreement begins.
4. Calculation of the new profit sharing ratio.
QUESTION 12 OF 20
Under the provisions of the Partnership Act 1932, can a new partner be admitted if one out of four existing partners explicitly disagrees, assuming the deed is silent?
QUESTION 13 OF 20
Assertion (A): A firm may admit a new partner solely because they need managerial help for the expansion of its business.
Reason (R): Expansion of business typically requires supplementary resources, which can be capital, managerial help, or both.
QUESTION 14 OF 20
Is the incoming partner strictly mandated to bring their agreed capital only in the form of hard currency (cash)?
QUESTION 15 OF 20
QUESTION 16 OF 20
QUESTION 17 OF 20
If C is admitted for a 1/4 share and brings Rs. 20,000 as capital, and partners agree total capitals should be proportionate to profit shares, what is the inferred formula-based total capital of the firm?
QUESTION 18 OF 20
If an established firm does not earn super profits (it only earns normal profits or incurs losses), does it possess goodwill according to the sources?
QUESTION 19 OF 20
Amar and Bahadur share profits in 3:2. Mary is admitted for 1/4 share. The new ratio between Amar and Bahadur will be 2:1. What is Amar's newly calculated share of the firm's total profit?
QUESTION 20 OF 20
Which of the following statements are true about the premium for goodwill brought by a new partner?
I. It is shared by existing partners in their sacrificing ratio.
II. It compensates the old partners for the loss of their share in super profits.
III. It is always distributed equally among all partners, including the new one.
Test Complete!
Answer Review
1 If an agreement exists between X and Y to share the profits of a business, but only X actively manages it on behalf of both, does this still satisfy the concept of a partnership?
Mutual agency is essential. All partners need not manage equally. One may act for all.
Partnership exists when business is carried on by all or any of them acting for all. Hence, Option D is correct.
- Option A → Equal management unnecessary.
- Option B → Administrative work not compulsory.
- Option C → Capital contribution irrelevant.
Used
- Definition Application
Application:
- �� Apply legal definition to scenario.
Final Logic:
- �� Mutual agency satisfies partnership requirement.
- "Any One Can Act for All"
2 Assertion (A): If partners decide to change their profit-sharing ratio from 3:2 to 1:1, the firm itself is completely dissolved.
Reason (R): Any change in the existing agreement amounts to reconstitution, leading to a new agreement, not the dissolution of the firm's business.
Ratio change causes reconstitution. Business usually continues. Dissolution does not occur automatically.
Changing the profit-sharing ratio results in reconstitution, not dissolution. Hence, Assertion is false and Reason is true.
- Option B → Assertion false.
- Option C → Reason true.
- Option D → Reason not false.
Used
- Assertion–Reason Analysis
Application:
- �� Distinguish reconstitution from dissolution.
Final Logic:
- �� Agreement changes without ending business.
- "Ratio Change ≠ Dissolution"
3 Hari and Haqque are partners sharing profits 3:2. They admit John for a 1/6 share. In terms of reconstitution, what effectively happens to the old 3:2 agreement?
Admission changes relationship. Old agreement ends. New agreement formed.
Admission of a new partner causes reconstitution and creates a new agreement. Hence, Option C is correct.
- Option A → Agreement changes.
- Option B → No temporary suspension.
- Option D → Agreements not transferred.
Used
- Conceptual Understanding
Application:
- �� Identify effect of admission.
Final Logic:
- �� Reconstitution replaces old agreement.
- "New Partner = New Agreement"
4 Which of the following events strictly lead to a change in the partnership agreement (reconstitution)?
I. Admission of a partner
II. Change in profit sharing ratio
III. Buying a new heavy machinery
IV. Retirement of a partner
Admission changes agreement. Ratio change alters relationship. Retirement causes reconstitution.
Admission, change in ratio, and retirement affect partnership relationships and cause reconstitution. Buying machinery does not. Hence, Option B is correct.
- Option A → Machinery purchase irrelevant.
- Option C → Admission omitted.
- Option D → Ratio change omitted.
Used
- Statement Filtering
Application:
- �� Identify events affecting agreement.
Final Logic:
- �� Only relationship changes cause reconstitution.
- "Partners or Ratio Change = Reconstitution"
5 Even though reconstitution results in a changed relationship among the members and ends the old agreement, what happens to the firm's business operations?
Agreement changes only. Business continuity remains. Dissolution unnecessary.
Reconstitution changes relationships among partners, but business operations continue normally. Hence, Option A is correct.
- Option B → Name change unnecessary.
- Option C → Asset liquidation not required.
- Option D → Firm may continue.
Used
- Conceptual Distinction
Application:
- �� Differentiate business continuity from dissolution.
Final Logic:
- �� Reconstitution does not stop business.
- "Partners Change, Business Continues"
6 Match the firm reconstitution event with the resulting change in relationship:
| List 1 | List 2 |
|---|---|
| 1. Admission | a. Remaining partners continue sharing future profits after a partner passes away |
| 2. Retirement | b. A partner withdraws due to old age or illness, leaving fewer partners |
| 3. Change in Ratio | c. New partner supplements resources, acquiring a share from old partners |
| 4. Death | d. Existing partners alter shares due to changed roles without adding/removing members |
Admission adds partner. Retirement removes partner. Ratio change alters shares.
Correct matching: Admission → New partner acquires share Retirement → Partner withdraws Change in Ratio → Shares altered Death → Remaining partners continue Hence, Option C is correct.
- Option A → Admission mismatched.
- Option B → Retirement incorrectly paired.
- Option D → Entire sequence incorrect.
Used
- Matching Logic
Application:
- �� Link events with consequences.
Final Logic:
- �� Only Option C fully correct.
- "Admission Adds, Retirement Leaves"
7 Anil and Vishal share profits in 3:2. They admit Sumit for 1/5 share. If Sumit acquires his share from old partners in their old ratio, what is Anil's new calculated share?
Incoming share distributed in old ratio. Anil sacrifices proportionately. New share calculated.
Anil's Old Share: 3/5 Sumit's Share from Anil: (1/5) × (3/5) = 3/25 New Share: (3/5) - (3/25) = 12/25 (3/5) - (3/25) = 12/25 Hence, Option D is correct.
- Option A → Incorrect subtraction.
- Option B → Old share only.
- Option C → Exceeds possible share.
Used
- Ratio Adjustment
Application:
- �� Deduct sacrificed share.
Final Logic:
- �� Anil's revised share equals (12/25).
- "Old Share Minus Sacrifice"
8 Ram, Mohan, and Sohan share in 3:2:1. Sohan brings additional capital, and they change the ratio to equal shares (1:1:1). What is the fractional gain calculated for Sohan?
Sohan's old share smaller. Equal ratio increases share. Gain calculated by difference.
Sohan's Old Share: 1/6 New Share: 1/3 Gain: (1/3) - (1/6) = 1/6 (1/3) - (1/6) = 1/6 Hence, Option B is correct.
- Option A → Excessive gain.
- Option C → New share only.
- Option D → Incorrect subtraction.
Used
- Gain Calculation
Application:
- �� Compare old and new shares.
Final Logic:
- �� Sohan gains (1/6).
- "Gain = New Share – Old Share"
9 If a partnership is strictly "at will," under what timeline can an existing partner legally choose to retire?
Partnership at will flexible. No fixed retirement date. Partner may retire anytime.
In a partnership at will, a partner can retire at any time after giving notice. Hence, Option C is correct.
- Option A → No year-end restriction.
- Option B → Profit/loss irrelevant.
- Option D → Court permission unnecessary.
Used
- Legal Provision Recall
Application:
- �� Apply partnership-at-will concept.
Final Logic:
- �� Flexible retirement permitted.
- "At Will = Anytime"
10 X, Y, and Z share profits 3:2:1. X dies. Y and Z decide to carry on the business equally. What is the immediate accounting implication for the firm's structure?
Death changes partnership structure. Remaining partners continue. New ratio established.
Death of a partner leads to reconstitution when remaining partners continue business. Hence, Option D is correct.
- Option A → Business may continue.
- Option B → Premium unnecessary.
- Option C → Two partners remain.
Used
- Conceptual Understanding
Application:
- �� Identify consequence of death.
Final Logic:
- �� New agreement required after death.
- "Death Changes Ratio"
11 Identify the correct sequence of logical/structural steps for legally admitting a partner:
1. Existing partners unanimously agree to the admission.
2. New partner brings capital and/or goodwill.
3. Old agreement ends, new agreement begins.
4. Calculation of the new profit sharing ratio.
Consent comes first. Agreement changes next. Capital introduced later.
Correct sequence: Consent of partners Old agreement ends Capital/goodwill brought New ratio calculated Hence, Option A is correct.
- Option B → Ratio cannot start process.
- Option C → Consent must precede admission.
- Option D → Agreement change not first.
Used
- Sequential Logic
Application:
- �� Arrange admission procedure logically.
Final Logic:
- �� Consent begins reconstitution.
- "Consent → Agreement → Capital → Ratio"
12 Under the provisions of the Partnership Act 1932, can a new partner be admitted if one out of four existing partners explicitly disagrees, assuming the deed is silent?
Admission needs unanimous consent. Deed may provide otherwise. One objection blocks admission.
Under the Partnership Act 1932, unanimous consent is required unless deed states otherwise. Hence, Option B is correct.
- Option A → Capital promise irrelevant.
- Option C → Majority insufficient.
- Option D → Admission allowed with consent.
Used
- Legal Rule Application
Application:
- �� Apply statutory provision.
Final Logic:
- �� Every partner must agree.
- "All Must Agree"
13 Assertion (A): A firm may admit a new partner solely because they need managerial help for the expansion of its business.
Reason (R): Expansion of business typically requires supplementary resources, which can be capital, managerial help, or both.
Expansion needs resources. Managerial support important. Reason explains admission need.
A firm may admit a new partner for managerial expertise or additional resources. Hence, both Assertion and Reason are true.
- Option A → Reason true.
- Option B → Assertion true.
- Option C → Both statements correct.
Used
- Assertion–Reason Analysis
Application:
- �� Relate business expansion with admission.
Final Logic:
- �� Expansion needs additional support.
- "Growth Needs Resources"
14 Is the incoming partner strictly mandated to bring their agreed capital only in the form of hard currency (cash)?
Capital may be cash. Assets can also be contributed. Flexible contribution allowed.
A new partner may contribute agreed capital either in cash or in kind. Hence, Option B is correct.
- Option A → Kind contribution allowed.
- Option C → Goodwill unrelated.
- Option D → Capital contribution generally required.
Used
- Legal Understanding
Application:
- �� Identify acceptable forms of capital.
Final Logic:
- �� Partnership permits flexible contribution.
- "Cash or Assets Both Allowed"
15
New partner needs profit share. Old partners sacrifice part. Compensation may arise.
Admission of a new partner reduces the old partners' profit share proportionately. Hence, Option A is correct.
- Option B → Assets do not double.
- Option C → Additional capital unnecessary.
- Option D → Voting rights remain.
Used
- Passage Interpretation
Application:
- �� Identify effect on old partners.
Final Logic:
- �� Profit sacrifice occurs.
- "New Share Comes from Old Share"
16
Mutual agreement required. All relevant partners involved. Flexible arrangement possible.
The new partner's share is decided mutually among old partners and the incoming partner. Hence, Option C is correct.
- Option A → Registrar not involved.
- Option B → New partner also participates.
- Option D → Equal division not compulsory.
Used
- Passage-Based Recall
Application:
- �� Identify decision-making authority.
Final Logic:
- �� Mutual consent determines share.
- "Share Decided Mutually"
17 If C is admitted for a 1/4 share and brings Rs. 20,000 as capital, and partners agree total capitals should be proportionate to profit shares, what is the inferred formula-based total capital of the firm?
Capital proportional to share. 1/4 share corresponds to Rs. 20,000. Total capital inferred proportionately.
If (1/4) share equals Rs. 20,000: 20000 × 4 = 80000 20000 × 4 = 80000 Hence, Option B is correct.
- Option A → Half required value.
- Option C → Excessively high.
- Option D → Incorrect multiplication.
Used
- Proportion Method
Application:
- �� Convert fractional share to total.
Final Logic:
- �� Total capital equals Rs. 80,000.
- "Share Fraction Determines Total"
18 If an established firm does not earn super profits (it only earns normal profits or incurs losses), does it possess goodwill according to the sources?
Goodwill linked with excess earnings. Super profits essential. Normal profits insufficient.
Goodwill exists only when a firm earns super profits over normal returns. Hence, Option D is correct.
- Option A → Not automatic.
- Option B → No fixed threshold.
- Option C → Patents not compulsory.
Used
- Conceptual Understanding
Application:
- �� Relate goodwill with profitability.
Final Logic:
- �� Super profits create goodwill.
- "No Super Profit, No Goodwill"
19 Amar and Bahadur share profits in 3:2. Mary is admitted for 1/4 share. The new ratio between Amar and Bahadur will be 2:1. What is Amar's newly calculated share of the firm's total profit?
Mary receives 1/4 share. Remaining share divided 2:1. Amar gets larger portion.
Remaining Share: 1 - (1/4) = 3/4 Amar's Share: (2/3) × (3/4) = 2/4 = 6/12 (2/3) × (3/4) = 2/4 Hence, Option C is correct.
- Option A → Too small.
- Option B → Mary's share.
- Option D → Incorrect allocation.
Used
- Remaining Share Method
Application:
- �� Divide remaining profits proportionately.
Final Logic:
- �� Amar receives (2/4).
- "Remaining Share × New Ratio"
20 Which of the following statements are true about the premium for goodwill brought by a new partner?
I. It is shared by existing partners in their sacrificing ratio.
II. It compensates the old partners for the loss of their share in super profits.
III. It is always distributed equally among all partners, including the new one.
Premium compensates sacrifice. Distribution follows sacrificing ratio. New partner does not share.
Statements I and II are true. Statement III is false because the incoming partner does not receive goodwill premium. Hence, Option A is correct.
- Option B → Statement III false.
- Option C → Statement I true.
- Option D → Statement III incorrect.
Used
- Statement Verification
Application:
- �� Evaluate goodwill treatment.
Final Logic:
- �� Sacrificing partners receive compensation.
- "Goodwill Rewards Sacrifice"
