CUET UG Applied Mathematics Booster Test 1 - Feasible Regions, Optimal Solutions, and Graphical Methods
📌 Answers are locked once submitted — results and explanations appear at the end.
QUESTION 1 OF 20
Match the linear constraints with the x-intercept of their boundary lines:
| List I | List II |
|---|---|
| 1. 2x + 3y = 12 → x = 6 | a. 2 |
| 2. 4x + y = 8 → x = 2 | b. 5 |
| 3. 5x + 5y = 25 → x = 5 | c. 6 |
| 4. 3x + 2y = 6 → x = 2 | d. 3 |
QUESTION 2 OF 20
Which coordinate pairs lie within the feasible region defined by:
x + y ≤ 8,
x + y ≥ 4,
x ≤ 5,
y ≤ 5,
x ≥ 0,
y ≥ 0
QUESTION 3 OF 20
If the vector:
\(\vec{v}=60\hat{i}+20\hat{j}\)
represents the optimal point (x, y) for the objective function:
Z = 15x + 10y
the maximum value of Z is:
QUESTION 4 OF 20
For:
Z = x + 2y
the minimum value exists at all points on a line segment AB. The probability that a randomly chosen point on segment AB yields this minimum value is:
QUESTION 5 OF 20
For the system:
4x + 6y ≤ 360,
3x ≤ 180,
5y ≤ 200
the intersection point of:
4x + 6y = 360 and 3x = 180
is:
QUESTION 6 OF 20
The area of the rectangular region bounded by:
x ≤ 5,
y ≤ 5,
x ≥ 0,
y ≥ 0
can be evaluated using:
∫₀⁵ 5 dx
The value of the area is:
QUESTION 7 OF 20
Nutritional data indicates cost ₹0.60 per lb for Food 1 (x) and ₹1.00 per lb for Food 2 (y). The objective function to minimize cost is:
QUESTION 8 OF 20
Assertion (A): Unbounded regions always possess a distinct maximum value.
Reason (R): Unbounded feasible regions are empty and contain no points.
QUESTION 9 OF 20
Arrange the values of:
Z = 5x + 3y
at the points:
1. \(\left(0\ ,\ 3\right)\)
2. \(\left(2\ ,\ 0\right)\)
3. \(\left(\frac{20}{19}\ ,\ \frac{45}{19}\right)\)
in descending order.
QUESTION 10 OF 20
Minimize:
Z = 3x + 5y
subject to:
x + 3y ≥ 3
x + y ≥ 2
At the point (1.5, 0.5), the value of Z is:
QUESTION 11 OF 20
The number of corner points of the feasible region defined by:
x + y ≤ 8,
x + y ≥ 4,
x ≤ 5,
y ≤ 5,
x ≥ 0,
y ≥ 0
is:
QUESTION 12 OF 20
The point of intersection of:
2x + y = 3,
x + 2y = 6
is:
QUESTION 13 OF 20
Evaluating the objective function:
Z = x − 7y + 190
at the point (0, 4), the value of Z is:
QUESTION 14 OF 20
Evaluating the function:
Z = x − 7y + 190
at the point (0, 5), the value of Z is:
QUESTION 15 OF 20
Maximize:
Z = –x + 2y
subject to:
–0.5x + y ≤ 2
x – y ≤ –1
x ≥ 0
y ≥ 0
The maximum value of Z is:
QUESTION 16 OF 20
Minimize:
Z = 4x – 2y
subject to:
x + y ≤ 14
2x + y ≤ 24
3x + 2y ≥ 14
x ≥ 0
y ≥ 0
The minimum value of Z is:
QUESTION 17 OF 20
For:
Z = 5x + 4y
subject to:
x – 2y ≤ 1
x + 2y ≤ 6
x – y ≥ 3
identify the correct conclusion:
QUESTION 18 OF 20
To verify whether a minimum value m exists for an unbounded feasible region, consider:
ax + by < m
If this half-plane has no common point with the feasible region, then:
QUESTION 19 OF 20
In the iso-profit method, an iso-profit line represents:
QUESTION 20 OF 20
If an iso-profit line is parallel to a constraint boundary of the feasible region, the number of optimal solutions is:
Test Complete!
Answer Review
1 Match the linear constraints with the x-intercept of their boundary lines:
| List I | List II |
|---|---|
| 1. 2x + 3y = 12 → x = 6 | a. 2 |
| 2. 4x + y = 8 → x = 2 | b. 5 |
| 3. 5x + 5y = 25 → x = 5 | c. 6 |
| 4. 3x + 2y = 6 → x = 2 | d. 3 |
The x-intercept is obtained by putting y = 0. Solve each equation after substituting y = 0. Match the calculated x-intercepts with List II.
The x-intercept of a straight line is the point where the line cuts the x-axis. At every x-intercept, the value of y is zero. For each equation: 1. 2x + 3y = 12 Put y = 0. 2x = 12 x = 6 Therefore, 1 → c. 2. 4x + y = 8 Put y = 0. 4x = 8 x = 2 Therefore, 2 → a. 3. 5x + 5y = 25 Put y = 0. 5x = 25 x = 5 Therefore, 3 → b. 4. 3x + 2y = 6 Put y = 0. 3x = 6 x = 2 Therefore, 4 → a. Thus, the correct matching is: 1 → c 2 → a 3 → b 4 → a Hence, Option A is the correct answer.
- Option B) 1–b, 2–a, 3–c, 4–d
- Incorrect because the first equation has x-intercept 6, not 5. The third equation has x-intercept 5, not 6. The fourth equation has x-intercept 2, not 3.
- Option C) 1–c, 2–d, 3–b, 4–a
- Incorrect because the second equation has x-intercept 2, not 3.
- Option D) 1–a, 2–b, 3–c, 4–d
- Incorrect because the x-intercepts of the first, second, third, and fourth equations are all incorrectly matched.
used
- Substitution
Application:
- To find the x-intercept of a linear equation, substitute y = 0 into each equation and solve for x. Then compare the obtained values with the options.
Final Logic:
- Setting y = 0 gives x-intercepts 6, 2, 5, and 2 respectively, which matches Option A.
"x-axis ⇒ y = 0; y-axis ⇒ x = 0."
2 Which coordinate pairs lie within the feasible region defined by:
x + y ≤ 8,
x + y ≥ 4,
x ≤ 5,
y ≤ 5,
x ≥ 0,
y ≥ 0
A feasible solution satisfies every constraint simultaneously. Substitute each coordinate pair into all inequalities. Only the points in Option C satisfy every condition.
A feasible solution is a point that satisfies all the given linear inequalities simultaneously. Check each option: Option A: (0, 0) x + y = 0 + 0 = 0 Since 0 < 4, it violates the condition x + y ≥ 4. Therefore, this point is not feasible. Option B: (6, 2) x + y = 6 + 2 = 8 ✓ But x = 6, which violates the condition x ≤ 5. Hence, this point is not feasible. Option C: (4, 4) and (3, 5) For (4, 4): x + y = 4 + 4 = 8 8 ≤ 8 ✓ 8 ≥ 4 ✓ x = 4 ≤ 5 ✓ y = 4 ≤ 5 ✓ x ≥ 0 and y ≥ 0 ✓ Therefore, (4, 4) is feasible. For (3, 5): x + y = 3 + 5 = 8 8 ≤ 8 ✓ 8 ≥ 4 ✓ x = 3 ≤ 5 ✓ y = 5 ≤ 5 ✓ x ≥ 0 and y ≥ 0 ✓ Therefore, (3, 5) is also feasible. Thus, both points satisfy all the constraints. Option D: (5, 5) x + y = 5 + 5 = 10 Since 10 > 8, it violates the condition x + y ≤ 8. Hence, this point is not feasible. Therefore, Option C is the correct answer.
- Option A) (0, 0)
- Incorrect because it does not satisfy the inequality x + y ≥ 4.
- Option B) (6, 2)
- Incorrect because x = 6 violates the condition x ≤ 5.
- Option D) (5, 5)
- Incorrect because x + y = 10 exceeds the maximum permitted value of 8.
used
- Substitution
Application:
- Substitute each coordinate pair into every inequality. Eliminate any point that violates even one constraint. A feasible point must satisfy all inequalities simultaneously.
Final Logic:
- Only the coordinate pairs (4, 4) and (3, 5) satisfy every constraint, making Option C the correct answer.
"Feasible means ALL conditions true."
3 If the vector:
\(\vec{v}=60\hat{i}+20\hat{j}\)
represents the optimal point (x, y) for the objective function:
Z = 15x + 10y
the maximum value of Z is:
The vector represents the optimal point (60, 20). Substitute x = 60 and y = 20 into the objective function. The calculated value of Z is 1100.
The given vector v⃗ = 60i + 20j represents the point (60, 20). The objective function is: Z = 15x + 10y Substitute x = 60 and y = 20. Z = 15(60) + 10(20) = 900 + 200 = 1100 Since the point (60, 20) is stated to be the optimal point, the value obtained is the maximum value of the objective function. Therefore, the maximum value of Z is 1100. Hence, Option A is the correct answer.
- Option B) 900
- Incorrect because it considers only the contribution of x and ignores the contribution of y.
- Option C) 1000
- Incorrect because it is not obtained by correctly substituting x = 60 and y = 20 into the objective function.
- Option D) 1200
- Incorrect because the calculated value of Z is 1100, not 1200.
used
- Substitution
Application:
- Identify the coordinates represented by the vector and substitute them directly into the objective function.
Final Logic:
- Substituting x = 60 and y = 20 gives Z = 1100, so Option A is correct.
"Optimal point → Substitute directly into Z."
4 For:
Z = x + 2y
the minimum value exists at all points on a line segment AB. The probability that a randomly chosen point on segment AB yields this minimum value is:
Every point on line segment AB gives the same minimum value. A randomly selected point from AB will always be optimal. Therefore, the probability is 1.
In linear programming, multiple optimal solutions occur when the objective function is parallel to one of the boundary lines of the feasible region. If the minimum value of Z exists at every point on the line segment AB, then each point on AB is an optimal solution. Since every point on the segment produces the same minimum value, selecting any point on AB will always give the minimum value. Therefore, Probability = (Number of favourable points) / (Total number of points) = All points on AB / All points on AB = 1 Hence, the probability is 1. Therefore, Option D is the correct answer.
- Option A) 0
- Incorrect because every point on AB gives the minimum value.
- Option B) 0.5
- Incorrect because the probability is not one-half; it is certain.
- Option C) 0.8
- Incorrect because there is no partial success. Every point on AB is optimal.
used
- Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application:
- The phrase "all points on line segment AB" indicates certainty. Therefore, the probability must be equal to 1.
Final Logic:
- Since every point on AB is optimal, the probability of choosing an optimal point is 1, making Option D correct.
"All points optimal ⇒ Probability = 1."
5 For the system:
4x + 6y ≤ 360,
3x ≤ 180,
5y ≤ 200
the intersection point of:
4x + 6y = 360 and 3x = 180
is:
Convert the inequalities into boundary equations. Solve the two equations simultaneously. The intersection point is (60, 20).
To find the intersection point of two lines, solve the equations simultaneously. The given boundary equations are: 4x + 6y = 360 3x = 180 From the second equation, x = 180/3 x = 60 Substitute x = 60 into the first equation: 4(60) + 6y = 360 240 + 6y = 360 6y = 120 y = 20 Hence, the point of intersection is: (60, 20) Therefore, the correct answer is Option C. This point represents the common point where both boundary lines intersect and is an important concept in determining corner points of the feasible region in linear programming.
- Option A) (60, 0)
- Incorrect because substituting (60, 0) into 4x + 6y = 360 gives:
- 4(60) + 6(0) = 240 ≠ 360
- Option B) (0, 40)
- Incorrect because it does not satisfy the equation 3x = 180.
- Option D) (30, 40)
- Incorrect because it does not satisfy the equation 3x = 180, where x must be 60.
used
- Substitution
Application:
- First solve the simpler equation to obtain x. Then substitute its value into the other equation to calculate y.
Final Logic:
- Using x = 60 in 4x + 6y = 360 gives y = 20, so the intersection point is (60, 20).
"Solve one, substitute into the other."
6 The area of the rectangular region bounded by:
x ≤ 5,
y ≤ 5,
x ≥ 0,
y ≥ 0
can be evaluated using:
∫₀⁵ 5 dx
The value of the area is:
The given region is a square with side length 5 units. The definite integral calculates the area under the constant function y = 5. The area of the region is 25 square units.
The given inequalities define the region: 0 ≤ x ≤ 5 0 ≤ y ≤ 5 This forms a square in the first quadrant with side length 5 units. The area is evaluated using the definite integral: Area = ∫₀⁵ 5 dx Since the integrand is constant, Area = 5 × (5 − 0) = 25 Alternatively, Area of square = Side × Side = 5 × 5 = 25 square units. Therefore, the value of the area is 25. Hence, Option B is the correct answer.
- Option A) 10
- Incorrect because it is not the area obtained from the given integral.
- Option C) 20
- Incorrect because multiplying the side length incorrectly gives this value.
- Option D) 15
- Incorrect because it does not represent the area of a square with side length 5.
used
- Substitution
Application:
- Evaluate the definite integral by multiplying the constant function with the length of the interval.
Final Logic:
- The integral ∫₀⁵ 5 dx equals 25, so Option B is correct.
"Constant × Interval = Area."
7 Nutritional data indicates cost ₹0.60 per lb for Food 1 (x) and ₹1.00 per lb for Food 2 (y). The objective function to minimize cost is:
The objective function represents the total cost. Multiply each variable by its respective unit cost. Add the costs to obtain the objective function.
In a linear programming problem, the objective function is formed by multiplying each decision variable by its corresponding unit cost. Given: Cost of Food 1 = ₹0.60 per lb Cost of Food 2 = ₹1.00 per lb Let: x = pounds of Food 1 y = pounds of Food 2 Therefore, Total Cost (Z) = (0.60 × x) + (1.00 × y) or Z = 0.60x + 1.00y This objective function correctly represents the total expenditure on both foods and is minimized to obtain the least possible cost. Hence, Option D is the correct answer.
- Option A) Z = 10x + 4y
- Incorrect because the coefficients do not match the given costs.
- Option B) Z = 5x + 5y
- Incorrect because equal coefficients are not supported by the given data.
- Option C) Z = x + 0.60y
- Incorrect because the coefficients of x and y are interchanged and do not represent the stated costs.
used
- Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application:
- Identify the cost associated with each variable and assign it directly as the coefficient in the objective function.
Final Logic:
- The coefficients must equal the unit costs, giving Z = 0.60x + 1.00y, which is Option D.
"Coefficient = Unit Cost."
8 Assertion (A): Unbounded regions always possess a distinct maximum value.
Reason (R): Unbounded feasible regions are empty and contain no points.
An unbounded feasible region does not necessarily have a maximum or minimum value. An unbounded region is not empty; it contains infinitely many feasible points. Therefore, both the Assertion and the Reason are false.
Assertion (A): Unbounded regions always possess a distinct maximum value. This statement is false. An unbounded feasible region extends indefinitely in one or more directions. Whether a maximum or minimum value exists depends on the direction of the objective function, not merely on the nature of the feasible region. Therefore, an unbounded region may have an optimal solution, may have multiple optimal solutions, or may have no finite optimum. Reason (R): Unbounded feasible regions are empty and contain no points. This statement is also false. An unbounded feasible region is not empty. It consists of infinitely many feasible points and extends indefinitely in one or more directions. An empty feasible region is called an infeasible region, which is entirely different from an unbounded region. Hence, both the Assertion and the Reason are false. Therefore, Option A is the correct answer.
- Option B) A is true, R is false
- Incorrect because the Assertion is false. An unbounded feasible region does not always have a distinct maximum value.
- Option C) Both A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation of A
- Incorrect because both statements are false.
- Option D) A is false, R is true
- Incorrect because the Reason is also false. An unbounded feasible region contains infinitely many feasible points.
used
- Elimination
Application:
- Evaluate the truth of the Assertion and the Reason independently. Since both statements are false, eliminate all options containing a true statement.
Final Logic:
- Both statements are false; therefore, Option A is correct.
"Unbounded ≠ Empty."
9 Arrange the values of:
Z = 5x + 3y
at the points:
1. \(\left(0\ ,\ 3\right)\)
2. \(\left(2\ ,\ 0\right)\)
3. \(\left(\frac{20}{19}\ ,\ \frac{45}{19}\right)\)
in descending order.
Evaluate Z at each given point. Compare the three values obtained. Arrange them from highest to lowest.
The objective function is: Z = 5x + 3y Evaluate Z at each point. Point 1: (0, 3) Z = 5(0) + 3(3) = 0 + 9 = 9 Point 2: (2, 0) Z = 5(2) + 3(0) = 10 + 0 = 10 Point 3: (20/19, 45/19) Z = 5(20/19) + 3(45/19) = 100/19 + 135/19 = 235/19 ≈ 12.37 Thus, Point 3 → 12.37 Point 2 → 10 Point 1 → 9 Hence, the descending order is: 3, 2, 1 Therefore, Option D is mathematically correct. Note: The provided answer key is incorrect.
- Option A) 1, 2, 3
- Incorrect because it arranges the values in ascending order rather than descending order.
- Option B) 2, 1, 3
- Incorrect because Point 3 has the highest value of Z.
- Option C) 3, 1, 2
- Incorrect because Point 2 gives a greater value than Point 1.
used
- Substitution
Application:
- Substitute each coordinate into the objective function and compare the numerical values obtained.
Final Logic:
- Since 12.37 > 10 > 9, the descending order is 3, 2, 1, making Option D the correct answer.
"Evaluate first, arrange later."
10 Minimize:
Z = 3x + 5y
subject to:
x + 3y ≥ 3
x + y ≥ 2
At the point (1.5, 0.5), the value of Z is:
Substitute the given coordinates into the objective function. Compute the value of Z directly. The calculated value is 7.
The objective function is: Z = 3x + 5y The given point is: (x, y) = (1.5, 0.5) Substitute these values into the objective function: Z = 3(1.5) + 5(0.5) = 4.5 + 2.5 = 7 Thus, the value of the objective function at the point (1.5, 0.5) is 7. The given point also satisfies the constraints: For x + 3y ≥ 3: 1.5 + 3(0.5) = 1.5 + 1.5 = 3 ✓ For x + y ≥ 2: 1.5 + 0.5 = 2 ✓ Therefore, the point is feasible, and the value of the objective function at this point is 7. Hence, Option A is the correct answer.
- Option B) 9
- Incorrect because substituting x = 1.5 and y = 0.5 gives Z = 7, not 9.
- Option C) 10
- Incorrect because it is not obtained from the given objective function and coordinates.
- Option D) 8
- Incorrect because the correct calculation yields Z = 7.
used
- Substitution
Application:
- Substitute the given coordinates directly into the objective function and perform the arithmetic carefully.
Final Logic:
- Substituting x = 1.5 and y = 0.5 gives Z = 7; therefore, Option A is correct.
"Given point → Substitute into Z."
11 The number of corner points of the feasible region defined by:
x + y ≤ 8,
x + y ≥ 4,
x ≤ 5,
y ≤ 5,
x ≥ 0,
y ≥ 0
is:
The feasible region is formed by the intersection of six linear constraints. The corner points are obtained by the intersections of the boundary lines. The feasible region has six vertices.
The given constraints are: x + y ≤ 8 x + y ≥ 4 x ≤ 5 y ≤ 5 x ≥ 0 y ≥ 0 These inequalities form a closed feasible region in the first quadrant. The corner points are obtained from the intersections of the boundary lines: (0, 4) (0, 5) (3, 5) (5, 3) (5, 0) (4, 0) Thus, the feasible region contains 6 corner points. In linear programming, these corner points are important because the optimum value of the objective function, if it exists, always occurs at one or more corner points of the feasible region. Hence, Option B is the correct answer.
- Option A) 4
- Incorrect because the feasible region has more than four vertices after considering all the constraints.
- Option C) 5
- Incorrect because one corner point has been omitted.
- Option D) 3
- Incorrect because the feasible region is a hexagon, not a triangle.
used
- Substitution
Application:
- Find the intersection points of the boundary lines and identify those satisfying all the constraints. Count the feasible vertices.
Final Logic:
- The feasible region has six valid corner points; therefore, Option B is correct.
"Corner points = Feasible vertices."
12 The point of intersection of:
2x + y = 3,
x + 2y = 6
is:
Solve the two linear equations simultaneously. Find the common values of x and y. The intersection point is (0, 3).
The equations are: 2x + y = 3 x + 2y = 6 From the first equation, y = 3 − 2x Substitute this into the second equation: x + 2(3 − 2x) = 6 x + 6 − 4x = 6 −3x = 0 x = 0 Substitute x = 0 into the first equation: 2(0) + y = 3 y = 3 Therefore, the point of intersection is: (0, 3) Hence, Option C is the correct answer.
- Option A) (1, 1)
- Incorrect because it satisfies the first equation but not the second.
- Option B) (2, 2)
- Incorrect because it does not satisfy either equation.
- Option D) (3, 0)
- Incorrect because it does not satisfy the second equation.
used
- Substitution
Application:
- Express one variable from one equation and substitute it into the other equation to obtain the common solution.
Final Logic:
- The simultaneous solution gives x = 0 and y = 3; therefore, Option C is correct.
"Common solution = Intersection point."
13
Evaluating the objective function:
Z = x − 7y + 190
at the point (0, 4), the value of Z is:
Substitute x = 0 and y = 4 into the objective function. Perform the arithmetic carefully. The value obtained is 162.
The objective function is: Z = x − 7y + 190 Substitute x = 0 and y = 4. Z = 0 − 7(4) + 190 = 0 − 28 + 190 = 162 Thus, the value of the objective function at (0, 4) is 162. Therefore, Option A is the correct answer.
- Option B) 190
- Incorrect because it ignores the term −7y.
- Option C) 155
- Incorrect because it is not obtained by correct substitution.
- Option D) 194
- Incorrect because it results from incorrect arithmetic.
used
- Substitution
Application:
- Replace x and y in the objective function with the given coordinates and simplify step by step.
Final Logic:
- Substituting (0, 4) gives Z = 162; therefore, Option A is correct.
"Point given → Substitute into Z."
14
Evaluating the function:
Z = x − 7y + 190
at the point (0, 5), the value of Z is:
Substitute x = 0 and y = 5 into the objective function. Simplify the expression. The resulting value is 155.
The objective function is: Z = x − 7y + 190 Substitute x = 0 and y = 5. Z = 0 − 7(5) + 190 = 0 − 35 + 190 = 155 Thus, the value of the objective function at the point (0, 5) is 155. Hence, Option C is the correct answer.
- Option A) 190
- Incorrect because it ignores the contribution of −7y.
- Option B) 162
- Incorrect because it is the value obtained when y = 4, not y = 5.
- Option D) 195
- Incorrect because it is not obtained from the given objective function.
used
- Substitution
Application:
- Insert the given coordinates into the objective function and evaluate the numerical value.
Final Logic:
- Substituting (0, 5) gives Z = 155; therefore, Option C is correct.
"Substitute carefully, then simplify."
15 Maximize:
Z = –x + 2y
subject to:
–0.5x + y ≤ 2
x – y ≤ –1
x ≥ 0
y ≥ 0
The maximum value of Z is:
Determine the feasible region from the given constraints. Evaluate the objective function at the corner points. The maximum value obtained is 4.
The constraints are: –0.5x + y ≤ 2 x – y ≤ –1 x ≥ 0 y ≥ 0 Rewrite the constraints: y ≤ 2 + 0.5x y ≥ x + 1 The corner points of the feasible region are: (0, 1) (0, 2) (2, 3) Evaluate the objective function Z = –x + 2y. At (0, 1): Z = –0 + 2(1) = 2 At (0, 2): Z = –0 + 2(2) = 4 At (2, 3): Z = –2 + 2(3) = –2 + 6 = 4 Thus, the maximum value of Z is 4. Hence, Option B is the correct answer.
- Option A) 2
- Incorrect because although Z = 2 at one corner point, it is not the maximum value.
- Option C) 6
- Incorrect because no corner point produces a value of 6.
- Option D) 8
- Incorrect because the objective function never attains this value within the feasible region.
used
- Substitution
Application:
- Determine the corner points of the feasible region and substitute each point into the objective function to identify the maximum value.
Final Logic:
- The largest value of Z at the corner points is 4; therefore, Option B is correct.
"Maximum occurs at a corner point."
16 Minimize:
Z = 4x – 2y
subject to:
x + y ≤ 14
2x + y ≤ 24
3x + 2y ≥ 14
x ≥ 0
y ≥ 0
The minimum value of Z is:
Determine the corner points of the feasible region. Evaluate the objective function at each corner point. The minimum value obtained is 0.
The objective function is: Z = 4x – 2y The feasible region is obtained from the given constraints. The relevant corner points are: (0, 7) (0, 14) (10, 4) (12, 0) Evaluate the objective function at these points. At (0, 7): Z = 4(0) – 2(7) = –14 At (0, 14): Z = 4(0) – 2(14) = –28 This point does not satisfy 3x + 2y ≥ 14? It does satisfy the constraint. At (10, 4): Z = 40 – 8 = 32 At (12, 0): Z = 48 Among all feasible corner points, the smallest value is –28. Since –28 is not given among the options, the provided options are inconsistent with the mathematical solution. Therefore, none of the listed options is correct. Note: The answer key provided (Option D) is incorrect.
- Option A) 14
- Incorrect because the objective function never attains this minimum value.
- Option B) 24
- Incorrect because it is not obtained at any feasible corner point.
- Option C) 0
- Incorrect because values smaller than 0 are attainable within the feasible region.
- Option D) 20
- Incorrect because the minimum value is not 20.
used
- Substitution
Application:
- Find all feasible corner points and substitute each into the objective function to determine the smallest value.
Final Logic:
- The mathematical minimum is –28; therefore, the question contains an incorrect answer key and inconsistent options.
"Min/Max → Check every corner point."
17 For:
Z = 5x + 4y
subject to:
x – 2y ≤ 1
x + 2y ≤ 6
x – y ≥ 3
identify the correct conclusion:
Analyze whether the constraints have a common feasible region. If no common region exists, the problem has no feasible solution. Therefore, no optimum value exists.
The constraints are: x – 2y ≤ 1 x + 2y ≤ 6 x – y ≥ 3 Graphically, these inequalities do not produce a common feasible region satisfying all three constraints simultaneously. Since there is no feasible region, no corner points exist for evaluating the objective function. Without a feasible region, the linear programming problem has no optimal solution. Therefore, the correct conclusion is that the problem has no feasible solution. Hence, Option B is the correct answer.
- Option A) Maximum value is 10
- Incorrect because no feasible solution exists.
- Option C) Maximum value is 20
- Incorrect because the objective function cannot be evaluated without a feasible region.
- Option D) Maximum value is 5
- Incorrect because the feasible region itself does not exist.
used
- Elimination
Application:
- First determine whether a feasible region exists. If not, eliminate all options claiming a maximum value.
Final Logic:
- Since no common feasible region exists, Option B is correct.
"No feasible region = No optimum."
18 To verify whether a minimum value m exists for an unbounded feasible region, consider:
ax + by < m
If this half-plane has no common point with the feasible region, then:
The inequality ax + by < m represents a half-plane. If this half-plane has no common point with the feasible region, no feasible solution has an objective value less than m. Therefore, m is the minimum value.
In linear programming, the objective function can be written as: Z = ax + by To verify whether m is the minimum value, consider the inequality: ax + by < m This inequality represents all points having an objective function value less than m. If this half-plane has no common point with the feasible region, then no feasible solution can produce a value smaller than m. Hence, the smallest attainable value of the objective function is exactly m. This graphical test is commonly used to verify the existence of a minimum value even when the feasible region is unbounded. Therefore, Option D is the correct answer.
- Option A) Z has no solution
- Incorrect because the condition confirms the existence of a minimum value rather than indicating the absence of a solution.
- Option B) Z is automatically maximum
- Incorrect because the question concerns verification of a minimum value, not a maximum value.
- Option C) The problem is bounded
- Incorrect because the feasible region may still be unbounded even though a minimum value exists.
used
- Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application:
- Interpret the graphical meaning of the inequality and determine what the absence of common points implies for the objective function.
Final Logic:
- If no feasible point satisfies ax + by < m, then m is the least attainable value; therefore, Option D is correct.
"No value below m ⇒ m is minimum."
19 In the iso-profit method, an iso-profit line represents:
An iso-profit line joins points having an equal objective function value. Every point on the same line gives the same profit. Parallel shifting of the line helps identify the optimum solution.
An iso-profit line is a line representing a constant value of the objective function. For example, if Z = 5x + 3y then 5x + 3y = k where k is a constant. Every point lying on this line produces the same value of the objective function. In the graphical method of linear programming, the iso-profit line is shifted parallel to itself until it reaches the last point or edge of the feasible region. That point or edge gives the optimal solution. Therefore, Option A is the correct answer.
- Option B) Boundary of constraints
- Incorrect because constraint boundaries define the feasible region, not the objective function.
- Option C) Non-negativity constraints
- Incorrect because non-negativity constraints are x ≥ 0 and y ≥ 0 and are unrelated to the iso-profit line.
- Option D) The origin (0, 0)
- Incorrect because an iso-profit line is a straight line and is not necessarily associated with the origin.
used
- Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application:
- Recognize the meaning of the term "iso-profit." The prefix "iso" means "equal," indicating equal values of profit.
Final Logic:
- An iso-profit line represents equal values of the objective function; therefore, Option A is correct.
"Iso = Equal Profit."
20 If an iso-profit line is parallel to a constraint boundary of the feasible region, the number of optimal solutions is:
Parallel objective and constraint lines produce multiple optimal solutions. Every point on the common boundary gives the same optimum value. Hence, infinitely many optimal solutions exist.
In the graphical method of linear programming, if the objective function (iso-profit line) is parallel to one of the boundary lines of the feasible region and coincides with a boundary segment at the optimum position, then every point on that boundary segment gives the same value of the objective function. Since a line segment contains infinitely many points, there are infinitely many optimal solutions. This situation is known as multiple optimal solutions. Therefore, Option C is the correct answer.
- Option A) 0
- Incorrect because optimal solutions do exist.
- Option B) 1
- Incorrect because more than one point on the boundary is optimal.
- Option D) 2
- Incorrect because the entire boundary segment is optimal, not just two points.
used
- Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application:
- Recognize that parallel objective and boundary lines indicate multiple optimal solutions along a line segment.
Final Logic:
- A complete boundary segment becomes optimal, giving infinitely many solutions; therefore, Option C is correct.
"Parallel lines ⇒ Infinite optima."
