CUET UG Geography Booster Test 1-Specialized Regional Programs
π Answers are locked once submitted β results and explanations appear at the end.
QUESTION 1 OF 20
Match the specialized regional development programme with the Five Year Plan during which it was initiated:
| List I | List II |
|---|---|
| 1. Hill Area Development Programme (HADP) | A. Fifth Five-Year Plan |
| 2. Drought Prone Area Programme (DPAP) | B. Fourth Five-Year Plan |
| 3. Fourth Five-Year Plan | C. Introduced programmes to address drought-affected regions |
| 4. Fifth Five-Year Plan | D. Introduced programmes for the development of hill regions |
QUESTION 2 OF 20
Consider the following districts included in the initial coverage of the Hill Area Development Programme:
I. Mikir Hill and North Cachar hills of Assam
II. Darjeeling district of West Bengal
III. Nilgiri district of Tamil Nadu
Which of the above were successfully covered under the 15 districts identified during the Fifth Five Year Plan?
QUESTION 3 OF 20
Arrange the chronological sequence of events regarding specialized regional planning in India:
1. Initiation of Drought Prone Area Programme.
2. Initiation of Hill Area Development Programme.
3. Recommendation by National Committee on the Development of Backward Area for height standards (600 m).
QUESTION 4 OF 20
A district has an average elevation of 800m. However, it is fully covered under a tribal sub-plan. Would it be treated as a backward hill area under the 1981 committee's criteria?
QUESTION 5 OF 20
Detailed plans for the development of hill areas must be drawn keeping in view their topographical, ________, social, and economic conditions.
QUESTION 6 OF 20
A planner decides to develop a hill area by introducing large-scale heavy metal manufacturing. Does this align with the indigenous resource harnessing strategy discussed in the text?
QUESTION 7 OF 20
Consider the following economic activities:
I. Poultry
II. Forestry
III. Heavy Steel Production
Which of these are promoted under the Hill Area Development Programme?
QUESTION 8 OF 20
Besides agriculture and animal husbandry, the hill area development plans emphasize the promotion of small-scale and ________ industry.
QUESTION 9 OF 20
The Drought Prone Area Programme initiated in the Fourth Five Year Plan had a dual objective of providing ________ and creating productive assets.
QUESTION 10 OF 20
Match the phases of the Drought Prone Area Programme with their focal activities:
| List I | List II |
|---|---|
| 1. Initial emphasis | A. Irrigation development, land improvement and afforestation |
| 2. Later emphasis | B. Labour-intensive civil works for immediate employment |
| 3. Early phase objective | C. Creation of short-term employment opportunities |
| 4. Later phase objective | D. Sustainable management of natural resources |
QUESTION 11 OF 20
Consider the following statements about Drought Infrastructure:
I. The programme initially laid emphasis on constructing capital-intensive heavy industries.
II. Later, it emphasized the creation of basic rural infrastructure such as electricity, roads, and markets.
Which of the statements is/are correct?
QUESTION 12 OF 20
A rural community in a drought-prone area receives funding. According to the later emphasis of the Drought Prone Area Programme, which infrastructure project should they prioritize?
QUESTION 13 OF 20
QUESTION 14 OF 20
QUESTION 15 OF 20
Arrange the historical events of drought identification criteria in chronological order:
1. Irrigation Commission introduced the 30% irrigated area criterion.
2. Planning Commission identified 67 districts prone to drought.
QUESTION 16 OF 20
Consider the following statements regarding drought identification criteria:
I. The Planning Commission identified 67 districts in 1967.
II. The Irrigation Commission (1972) introduced the criterion of 30 percent irrigated area to demarcate drought-prone areas.
Which of the above is/are true?
QUESTION 17 OF 20
Match the drought-prone plateau regions with their respective states:
| List I | List II |
|---|---|
| 1. Telangana Plateau | A. Karnataka |
| 2. Karnataka Plateau | B. Andhra Pradesh (historical undivided state context) |
| 3. Marathwada Plateau | C. Maharashtra |
| 4. Rayalaseema Plateau | D. Southern Andhra Pradesh (historical context) |
QUESTION 18 OF 20
Broadly, the drought-prone area in India spreads over the semi-arid and arid tracts of Rajasthan, Gujarat, and Western ________.
QUESTION 19 OF 20
A geographer observes that North-Rajasthan is largely protected from drought despite being located in an arid zone. What is the reason cited in the text?
QUESTION 20 OF 20
Match the region with its specific vulnerability status related to drought and irrigation as per the text:
| List I | List II |
|---|---|
| 1. Punjab | A. Largely protected because of extensive canal and tube-well irrigation |
| 2. Marathwada region | B. Frequently affected by drought due to limited irrigation |
| 3. Haryana | C. Reduced dependence on monsoon because of widespread irrigation facilities |
| 4. Interior parts of Tamil Nadu | D. Rain-shadow region with recurring drought conditions |
Test Complete!
Answer Review
1 Match the specialized regional development programme with the Five Year Plan during which it was initiated:
| List I | List II |
|---|---|
| 1. Hill Area Development Programme (HADP) | A. Fifth Five-Year Plan |
| 2. Drought Prone Area Programme (DPAP) | B. Fourth Five-Year Plan |
| 3. Fourth Five-Year Plan | C. Introduced programmes to address drought-affected regions |
| 4. Fifth Five-Year Plan | D. Introduced programmes for the development of hill regions |
India introduced specialised regional development programmes through different Five-Year Plans. The Drought Prone Area Programme (DPAP) was launched before the Hill Area Development Programme (HADP). The Fourth Five-Year Plan focused on drought-prone regions. The Fifth Five-Year Plan expanded regional planning by introducing programmes for hill areas.
This matching question relates specialised regional development programmes to the Five-Year Plans during which they were introduced. The Hill Area Development Programme (HADP) (1) was introduced during the Fifth Five-Year Plan (A) to promote the development of hill regions. The Drought Prone Area Programme (DPAP) (2) was launched during the Fourth Five-Year Plan (B) to address the problems of drought-affected areas. The Fourth Five-Year Plan (3) introduced programmes to address drought-affected regions (C), while the Fifth Five-Year Plan (4) introduced programmes for the development of hill regions (D). Therefore, the correct matching is 1-A, 2-B, 3-C, 4-D.
- Option A: This option incorrectly exchanges the programmes introduced under the Fourth and Fifth Five-Year Plans, resulting in an incorrect historical sequence.
- Option B: This option misclassifies both the Hill Area Development Programme and the Drought Prone Area Programme by assigning them to the wrong planning phases.
- Option D: This option incorrectly associates the development programmes with unrelated Five-Year Plan objectives and reverses the chronological order.
Used
- Chronological Programme Classification
Application: Identify the sequence in which specialised regional development programmes were introduced under the Five-Year Plans.
Final Logic: The Drought Prone Area Programme began during the Fourth Five-Year Plan, while the Hill Area Development Programme was introduced during the Fifth Five-Year Plan, confirming Option C.
Fifth Plan β Hills Next.
2 Consider the following districts included in the initial coverage of the Hill Area Development Programme:
I. Mikir Hill and North Cachar hills of Assam
II. Darjeeling district of West Bengal
III. Nilgiri district of Tamil Nadu
Which of the above were successfully covered under the 15 districts identified during the Fifth Five Year Plan?
The program initially covered 15 hill districts across several Indian states. This geographic rollout targeted vulnerable, non-contiguous mountain ecosystems. The list included hill tracts in Assam, West Bengal, Uttar Pradesh, and Tamil Nadu.
The initial rollout of the Hill Area Development Programme during the Fifth Five Year Plan targeted 15 specific districts that faced distinct topographical and economic challenges. The official list included all the hilly districts of Uttar Pradesh (now Uttarakhand), the Mikir Hills and North Cachar Hills of Assam (I), the Darjeeling district of West Bengal (II), and the Nilgiri district of Tamil Nadu (III). Because all three regions were part of the initial group of 15 districts, option D is the correct choice.
- Option A: This choice is incorrect because it excludes the Nilgiri district of Tamil Nadu, which was part of the initial list of 15 districts.
- Option B: This choice is incorrect because it leaves out the Mikir Hills and North Cachar Hills of Assam, which were included from the start.
- Option C: This choice is incorrect because it omits the Darjeeling district of West Bengal, which also received funding during the initial phase.
Used: Geographic Rollout Verification
Application: Cross-checking the listed districts against the official list of regions included in the initial phase of the program.
Final Logic: Since all three listed regions are explicitly named as part of the initial group, they must all be included in the correct choice, validating option D.
The initial 15 districts linked hills from across the country: Assam in the northeast, Darjeeling in the east, and Nilgiris in the south.
3 Arrange the chronological sequence of events regarding specialized regional planning in India:
1. Initiation of Drought Prone Area Programme.
2. Initiation of Hill Area Development Programme.
3. Recommendation by National Committee on the Development of Backward Area for height standards (600 m).
Specialized regional programs in India developed in a clear chronological order. The drought program was introduced first, during the Fourth Plan (1969β1974). The hill program followed during the Fifth Plan (1974β1978). The National Committee established specific height baselines for hill areas later, in 1981.
This question requires arranging key events in India's regional development history in chronological order. The timeline begins with the launch of the Drought Prone Area Programme during the Fourth Five Year Plan (1). Next, the Hill Area Development Programme was introduced during the Fifth Five Year Plan to support mountainous tracts (2). Finally, in 1981, the National Committee on the Development of Backward Areas issued specific criteria, setting a 600-meter altitude baseline to identify backward hill regions (3). This progression follows the sequence 1, 2, 3, validating option D.
- Option A: This option is incorrect because it places the Hill Area Development Programme before the earlier Drought Prone Area Programme, disrupting the chronological sequence.
- Option B: This option is incorrect because it places the recommendation of the National Committee on the Development of Backward Areas at the beginning, even though it came after the initiation of the two programmes.
- Option C: This option is incorrect because it inserts the committee recommendation between the launches of the Drought Prone Area Programme and the Hill Area Development Programme, which does not reflect the actual timeline.
Used: Timeline Reconstruction
Application: Mapping each policy milestone to its correct Five-Year Plan or calendar year (Fourth Plan β Fifth Plan β 1981.).
Final Logic: Ordering the events from the earliest plan to the 1981 committee recommendations yields the sequence 1, 2, 3, matching option D.
Follow the timeline: Fourth Plan drought relief (1) β Fifth Plan hill programmes (2) β 1981 height standards (3).
4 A district has an average elevation of 800m. However, it is fully covered under a tribal sub-plan. Would it be treated as a backward hill area under the 1981 committee's criteria?
The 1981 National Committee established two main rules to identify backward hill areas. While the district's 800-meter elevation satisfies the minimum 600-meter height rule, it must also meet administrative criteria. To prevent overlapping development funds, regions covered by an existing tribal sub-plan are excluded.
The National Committee on the Development of Backward Areas (1981) created specific guidelines to ensure development funds were distributed efficiently without overlapping. The committee recommended that a region must have a minimum altitude of 600 meters and must not be covered under an existing tribal sub-plan. Even though this district's 800-meter elevation satisfies the height baseline, its inclusion in a tribal sub-plan means it already receives dedicated funding. It is therefore excluded from being classified as a backward hill area, validating option B.
- Option A: This choice is incorrect because it focuses only on the altitude threshold while ignoring the administrative rule that excludes tribal sub-plan areas.
- Option C: This choice is incorrect because tribal sub-plans and backward hill programs are kept separate to avoid overlapping budgets.
- Option D: This choice is incorrect because it misstates the committee's altitude rule, which sets the baseline at 600 meters rather than 1000 meters.
Used: Multi-Criteria Filter Testing
Application: Testing the scenario against both the altitude baseline (600m) and the administrative exclusion rule for tribal sub-plans.
Final Logic: Because the district is part of an active tribal sub-plan, it is excluded from classification as a backward hill area, making option B correct.
Existing tribal sub-plan coverage means the area is excluded from backward hill area funding to avoid overlapping budgets.
5 Detailed plans for the development of hill areas must be drawn keeping in view their topographical, ________, social, and economic conditions.
Hilly terrains feature fragile ecosystems that are highly sensitive to human activity. General development models cannot simply be copied from the plains. Planners must balance local topography, ecosystems, social systems, and economic factors.
Mountain and hill ecosystems are naturally fragile, making them sensitive to deforestation, soil erosion, and landslides. To prevent environmental damage, the Hill Area Development Programme explicitly requires that local plans look beyond basic financial metrics. Strategies must be tailored to balance four interconnected local factors: topographical, ecological, social, and economic conditions, making option C the correct answer.
- Option A: While political boundaries define administration, they do not dictate the physical terrain constraints that shape regional planning.
- Option B: Linguistic patterns help guide educational policy, but they do not shape the environmental strategies needed for fragile hill ecosystems.
- Option D: Pushing for general industrial growth without adapting to the local landscape ignores the environmental constraints of hilly regions.
Used: Textual Key Concept Identification
Application: Identifying the missing environmental factor in the text's list of core planning conditions for hill areas.
Final Logic: The text emphasizes that ecological conditions must be considered alongside terrain, society, and the economy, confirming option C.
Fragile mountain ecosystems mean that hill planning must always prioritize local ecological conditions.
6 A planner decides to develop a hill area by introducing large-scale heavy metal manufacturing. Does this align with the indigenous resource harnessing strategy discussed in the text?
Large-scale heavy metal manufacturing requires flat land, massive power grids, and deep supply lines. These requirements do not fit the terrain constraints or fragile ecosystems of hilly regions. The program focuses instead on developing native resources through farming, forestry, and small-scale crafts.
The Hill Area Development Programme is designed around the concept of self-sustaining, eco-friendly local economies. Introducing large-scale heavy metal manufacturing does not fit this model, as it requires flat land and heavy infrastructure, which can damage fragile mountain ecosystems. The text notes that the program's actual strategy focuses on harnessing indigenous resources through sustainable local activities like horticulture, forestry, animal husbandry, and small-scale village industries, validating option B.
- Option A: Prioritizing short-term industrial profits ignores the long-term environmental damage and landslides that heavy industry can cause in steep terrains.
- Option C: Hill areas naturally lack the massive transport links, heavy rail lines, and large energy grids needed to support heavy metallurgy.
- Option D: The program does not ban economic development; it actively encourages eco-friendly local livelihood activities.
Used: Theoretical Consistency Check
Application: Evaluating a heavy industry proposal against the text's focus on sustainable, native-resource development.
Final Logic: Because the strategy relies on eco-friendly, small-scale village and primary activities, heavy factories do not fit the plan, making option B correct.
Protect fragile hills by focusing on native resources like forestry and village crafts, rather than heavy factories.
7 Consider the following economic activities:
I. Poultry
II. Forestry
III. Heavy Steel Production
Which of these are promoted under the Hill Area Development Programme?
Hilly regions require eco-friendly economic activities that match the local terrain. Poultry (I) and forestry (II) leverage native resources without disrupting the landscape. Heavy steel mills (III) require large flat spaces and heavy transport, which can damage fragile hill ecosystems.
The Hill Area Development Programme focuses on promoting economic activities that match the local terrain and use native resources sustainably. Activities like poultry farming (I), forestry management (II), horticulture, and animal husbandry are actively supported because they provide stable livelihoods without damaging fragile mountain ecosystems. Heavy steel production (III), however, requires large flat spaces, massive energy inputs, and heavy transport networks that do not fit the terrain or ecological needs of hill areas. Therefore, only activities 1 and 2 are promoted, validating option A.
- Option B: This choice is incorrect because it includes heavy steel production, which is not suited for fragile mountain ecosystems.
- Option C: This choice is incorrect because it includes steel manufacturing while omitting sustainable local forestry programs.
- Option D: This option is incorrect because it includes heavy steel production, which contradicts the program's focus on eco-friendly, native-resource development.
Used: Ecological Suitability Screening
Application: Testing each activity against the program's dual goals of economic development and environmental protection in hilly regions.
Final Logic: Since poultry and forestry are sustainable local activities, while heavy steel mills are not, only 1 and 2 are correct, confirming option A.
Support local, eco-friendly activities like forestry and poultry; avoid landscape-disrupting heavy steel mills.
8 Besides agriculture and animal husbandry, the hill area development plans emphasize the promotion of small-scale and ________ industry.
Developing industry in hill tracts requires small-scale operations that match local capacities. The program focuses on processing native raw materials within local communities. This strategy emphasizes supporting small workshops and traditional village industries.
Industrial planning for hilly regions must accommodate the challenges of rugged terrain, isolated communities, and higher transportation costs. To address these factors, the Hill Area Development Programme avoids large-scale urban factory models. Instead, it focuses on promoting small-scale workshops and traditional village industries, such as handloom weaving, basketry, and food processing. These activities use native raw materials and create jobs within local communities without requiring heavy transport networks, validating option B.
- Option A: High-tech information technology hubs require specialized urban infrastructure and digital networks, which were not the focus of early rural hill development programs.
- Option C: Petrochemical refining requires large flat coastal or pipeline-connected spaces, heavy industrial equipment, and deep supply lines, which do not fit mountain environments.
- Option D: Heavy machinery manufacturing depends on large-scale iron supplies, flat land, and heavy rail connections, which are not feasible in rugged terrain.
Used: Resource-Scale Matching
Application: Identifying the type of industrial development that fits the scale, labor access, and transport realities of rural hill communities.
Final Logic: The text explicitly pairs small-scale operations with traditional village industries, making option B the correct choice.
Keep industrial development in hill areas local and sustainable by supporting small-scale village workshops.
9 The Drought Prone Area Programme initiated in the Fourth Five Year Plan had a dual objective of providing ________ and creating productive assets.
Severe droughts frequently cause crop failure, leaving rural farm laborers without work. To address this issue, the program designed labor-intensive community public works. This strategy creates productive infrastructure while providing steady employment and income.
Droughts impact rural areas by causing crop failures, which quickly lead to seasonal unemployment for farmers and agricultural laborers. To address this risk, the Drought Prone Area Programme was designed with a dual purpose: it used labor-intensive public works to provide immediate employment and income to families, while ensuring those projects built productive community assets, such as water tanks and roads, validating option B.
- Option A: While providing electricity for irrigation pumps is important, distributing free electricity was not the primary dual objective of early drought relief programs.
- Option C: Rural infrastructure was the main focus, and urban housing projects are managed through separate, dedicated housing programs.
- Option D: While improving schools matters for long-term development, higher education does not address the immediate need for rural income and employment during severe dry seasons.
Used: Core Objective Extraction
Application: Finding the missing component of the dual objective that addresses seasonal unemployment caused by climate shocks.
Final Logic: The program focused on providing employment through community public works, matching the dual objective and confirming option B.
The program's core strategy uses community public works to provide steady employment and build productive assets.
10 Match the phases of the Drought Prone Area Programme with their focal activities:
| List I | List II |
|---|---|
| 1. Initial emphasis | A. Irrigation development, land improvement and afforestation |
| 2. Later emphasis | B. Labour-intensive civil works for immediate employment |
| 3. Early phase objective | C. Creation of short-term employment opportunities |
| 4. Later phase objective | D. Sustainable management of natural resources |
The Drought Prone Area Programme (DPAP) changed its priorities over time. The initial phase concentrated on providing employment through labour-intensive works. The later phase focused on conserving natural resources and improving agricultural productivity. This transition shifted the programme from immediate relief to sustainable development.
This matching question relates the different phases of the Drought Prone Area Programme (DPAP) to their principal activities and objectives. The Initial emphasis (1) was on labour-intensive civil works for immediate employment (B) to provide relief in drought-affected regions. The Later emphasis (2) shifted towards irrigation development, land improvement and afforestation (A) to strengthen the natural resource base. The Early phase objective (3) was the creation of short-term employment opportunities (C). The Later phase objective (4) focused on the sustainable management of natural resources (D) for long-term drought mitigation. Therefore, the correct matching is 1-B, 2-A, 3-C, 4-D.
- Option A: This option incorrectly places long-term resource management activities in the initial phase and reverses the programme's chronological development.
- Option B: This option exchanges the objectives of the early and later phases, resulting in incorrect matching.
- Option C: This option incorrectly associates the initial phase with sustainable resource management and misplaces the remaining programme activities.
Used
- Chronological Phase Classification
Application: Arrange the programme activities according to the sequence in which they were implementedβimmediate employment generation first, followed by long-term natural resource development.
Final Logic: The initial phase focused on labour-intensive works and employment generation, while the later phase concentrated on irrigation, land development, afforestation and sustainable resource management, confirming Option D.
(Think: "Jobs First, Resources Next.")
11 Consider the following statements about Drought Infrastructure:
I. The programme initially laid emphasis on constructing capital-intensive heavy industries.
II. Later, it emphasized the creation of basic rural infrastructure such as electricity, roads, and markets.
Which of the statements is/are correct?
Statement I is false because the program focused on local civil works rather than heavy industries. Statement II is true because the program later expanded to build essential rural infrastructure. This network included providing electricity, roads, markets, and credit lines.
Statement I is incorrect because the Drought Prone Area Programme never focused on building heavy, capital-intensive factories, which do not fit the immediate needs or water constraints of dry rural regions. Statement II is correct because, as the program evolved, planners realized that helping dry regions handle climate shocks required a reliable local infrastructure network. The program shifted its focus to build foundational rural utilities, including electricity grids for wells, local roads, markets, credit lines, and services, validating option B.
- Option A: This choice incorrectly validates statement I, mistakenly claiming that rural drought programs were used to build heavy manufacturing plants.
- Option C: This choice is incorrect because it accepts statement I, failing to recognize that the program focused on rural infrastructure rather than heavy factories.
- Option D: This choice incorrectly rejects statement II, overlooking the program's documented focus on building rural roads, markets, and utility networks.
Used: Project Fit Assessment
Application: Testing the listed projects against the program's focus on rural drought relief and local community infrastructure.
Final Logic: Since the program focused on rural utilities rather than heavy factories, statement II is true and statement I is false, matching option B.
Drought relief funds are used to build rural infrastructure like roads and electricity networks, not heavy manufacturing plants.
12 A rural community in a drought-prone area receives funding. According to the later emphasis of the Drought Prone Area Programme, which infrastructure project should they prioritize?
Local development funds must be spent on projects that match the program's official guidelines. The program emphasizes building a reliable infrastructure network to support the rural economy. Priority investments include rural electricity, transport networks, and market access.
To help rural communities handle the economic challenges of frequent droughts, funding must be directed toward projects that strengthen the local economy. According to the guidelines of the Drought Prone Area Programme, priority should be given to building foundational rural infrastructure. This includes setting up electricity grids to run irrigation pumps, building local roads to connect isolated villages, and establishing market services to sell crops safely, validating option B.
- Option A: Multi-story shopping malls are commercial developments designed for large cities, rather than infrastructure that supports dry rural farming communities.
- Option C: Building international airports requires massive national transport budgets and does not address the water or income needs of local farmers.
- Option D: Setting up a seaport is physically impossible for landlocked interior plateaus, which make up the vast majority of India's dry regions.
Used: Local Need Alignment
Application: Selecting the infrastructure option that matches the program's goals of supporting dry rural areas and strengthening local markets.
Final Logic: Developing electricity networks, roads, and market links directly supports the rural economy, confirming option B.
Strengthen rural communities by investing in the basics: electricity for pumps, roads for transport, and local markets for trade.
13
The question asks for the primary reason to create alternative jobs based on the text. The second sentence of the passage outlines the problem. Rising population pressure forces communities to farm fragile marginal lands, causing environmental damage.
This question requires identifying a cause-and-effect relationship directly from the text. The second sentence states: "Since growing population pressure is forcing the society to utilise the marginal lands for agriculture, and, thereby causing ecological degradation, there is a need to create alternative employment opportunities..." This shows that because farming is expanding into fragile marginal lands and causing environmental damage, planners must create non-farming jobs to reduce pressure on the land, validating option B.
- Option A: The text does not describe the local agricultural sector as highly profitable; rather, it highlights the environmental issues caused by expanding farming onto poor land.
- Option C: The text notes that the program is closely tied to agricultural development, which contradicts the idea of a government ban on farming.
- Option D: The passage focuses on the environmental impacts of expanding rural agriculture, without mentioning industrial pollution on the plains.
Used: Textual Causality Extraction
Application: Linking the need for alternative jobs to the specific environmental problems described in the text.
Final Logic: The passage explicitly states that alternative jobs are needed because population pressure on marginal lands causes ecological degradation, confirming option B.
The text provides the explanation: population pressure forces farming onto marginal lands, causing environmental damage.
14
The question asks for the primary focus of agricultural programs as stated in the text. The first sentence explicitly provides this information. The main goal of these agricultural initiatives is to restore the ecological balance.
This question requires direct retrieval of information from the provided text. The first sentence states: "It has been observed that this programme is largely confined to the development of agriculture and allied sectors with major focus on restoration of ecological balance." This phrase confirms that the primary goal of supporting farming and livestock in these dry regions is to restore the natural environmental balance, validating option C.
- Option A: The passage does not mention global cash crop exports, which are generally not suited for dry, drought-prone areas.
- Option B: The text focuses on environmental management rather than full farm mechanization or industrial machinery.
- Option D: Introducing water-intensive crops like sugarcane or rice would exhaust local water supplies, running counter to the goal of ecological balance.
Used: Direct Textual Matching
Application: Identifying the main goal of the program's agricultural initiatives as stated in the first sentence of the text.
Final Logic: The text explicitly states that the major focus is the restoration of ecological balance, confirming option C.
The text directly states the primary goal: agricultural development must focus on the restoration of ecological balance.
15 Arrange the historical events of drought identification criteria in chronological order:
1. Irrigation Commission introduced the 30% irrigated area criterion.
2. Planning Commission identified 67 districts prone to drought.
The two policy organizations studied and mapped India's dry regions at different times. The Planning Commission conducted its initial review first, in 1967. This early study identified 67 districts as vulnerable to drought. The Irrigation Commission introduced its 30% irrigation baseline later, in 1972.
This question requires organizing India's historical drought classification criteria in chronological order. The timeline begins in 1967, when the Planning Commission conducted a national study and identified 67 districts as prone to drought (2). Five years later, in 1972, the Irrigation Commission introduced a specific, measurable rule: any region with less than 30% of its cultivated land under irrigation should be classified as drought-prone (1). This historical sequence follows the order 2 then 1, validating option B.
- Option A: This choice reverses the timeline, incorrectly placing the 1972 Irrigation Commission criteria ahead of the 1967 Planning Commission study.
- Option C: This choice is incorrect because only the Planning Commission's review occurred in 1967, while the Irrigation Commission was set up later.
- Option D: This choice is incorrect because it claims both events happened in 1972, ignoring the Planning Commission's earlier 1967 study.
Used: Historical Timeline Reconstruction
Application: Mapping each institution's work to its correct historical year (Planning Commission β 1967, Irrigation Commission β 1972).
Final Logic: Ordering the events from 1967 to 1972 gives the sequence 2 then 1, making option B correct.
The Planning Commission mapped the 67 districts first in 1967 (2); the Irrigation Commission set the 30% rule later in 1972 (1).
16 Consider the following statements regarding drought identification criteria:
I. The Planning Commission identified 67 districts in 1967.
II. The Irrigation Commission (1972) introduced the criterion of 30 percent irrigated area to demarcate drought-prone areas.
Which of the above is/are true?
Statement I is correct because the Planning Commission's 1967 study identified 67 vulnerable districts. Statement II is correct because the Irrigation Commission used a 30% irrigation baseline in 1972. These two initiatives provided the data and rules needed to manage drought relief.
Statement I is correct because the Planning Commission conducted a national study in 1967 to map out regional water scarcity, identifying 67 districts as vulnerable to drought. Statement II is also correct because, in 1972, the Irrigation Commission introduced a clear administrative rule: any district where less than 30% of the farmed land is irrigated is classified as drought-prone. Since both statements accurately describe the history and rules of drought identification in India, option C is the correct answer.
- Option A: This choice validates statement I but incorrectly ignores the 1972 Irrigation Commission's 30% baseline rule.
- Option B: This choice validates statement II but overlooks the Planning Commission's initial 1967 study.
- Option D: This choice incorrectly rejects both statements, missing the established historical dates and rules for mapping drought areas.
Used: Policy Data Verification
Application: Checking both statements against historical records regarding the 1967 district study and the 1972 irrigation baseline.
Final Logic: Since both statements accurately present the historical facts and rules, option C is the correct choice.
Remember the dates and data points: 67 districts in 1967 (I) and the 30% irrigation rule in 1972 (II).
17 Match the drought-prone plateau regions with their respective states:
| List I | List II |
|---|---|
| 1. Telangana Plateau | A. Karnataka |
| 2. Karnataka Plateau | B. Andhra Pradesh (historical undivided state context) |
| 3. Marathwada Plateau | C. Maharashtra |
| 4. Rayalaseema Plateau | D. Southern Andhra Pradesh (historical context) |
Several plateau regions of peninsular India are prone to drought because of low and irregular rainfall. These regions are identified according to their geographical location and administrative boundaries. In the historical NCERT context, Telangana formed part of the undivided Andhra Pradesh. Understanding these regional locations is important for studying drought-prone area planning.
This matching question relates drought-prone plateau regions to their corresponding states. The Telangana Plateau (1) formed part of Andhra Pradesh (historical undivided state context) (B). The Karnataka Plateau (2) is located in Karnataka (A). The Marathwada Plateau (3) lies in Maharashtra (C) and is frequently affected by drought because of its semi-arid conditions. The Rayalaseema Plateau (4) is situated in southern Andhra Pradesh (historical context) (D) and is also recognised as a drought-prone region. Therefore, the correct matching is 1-B, 2-A, 3-C, 4-D.
- Option B: This option incorrectly exchanges the locations of the Telangana Plateau and Marathwada and misclassifies the remaining plateau regions.
- Option C: This option reverses the locations of the Telangana Plateau and Karnataka Plateau and incorrectly matches Marathwada and Rayalaseema.
- Option D: This option incorrectly associates the Telangana Plateau with Rayalaseema and misplaces the remaining plateau regions.
Used
- Regional Geography Classification
Application: Match each drought-prone plateau with the state in which it is located according to the historical NCERT classification.
Final Logic: Telangana Plateau corresponds to Andhra Pradesh (historical context), Karnataka Plateau to Karnataka, Marathwada to Maharashtra, and Rayalaseema to southern Andhra Pradesh, confirming Option A.
Rayalaseema β Southern Andhra Pradesh
18 Broadly, the drought-prone area in India spreads over the semi-arid and arid tracts of Rajasthan, Gujarat, and Western ________.
India's core interior dry belt is defined by its low seasonal rainfall. This arid and semi-arid tract runs across several states in western and central India. The dry zone covers Rajasthan, Gujarat, and the western part of Madhya Pradesh.
The dry belt in western and central India forms a continuous geographic zone characterized by low seasonal rainfall and high evaporation rates. This arid and semi-arid tract covers most of Rajasthan and major parts of Gujarat, before extending eastward into western Madhya Pradesh. These connected regions face shared climate risks and are covered by the Drought Prone Area Programme, validating option B.
- Option A: Western Uttar Pradesh is located in the fertile, well-irrigated Indo-Gangetic plain and is not part of this western arid and semi-arid dry belt.
- Option C: West Bengal has a humid subtropical climate and receives high annual rainfall from the monsoon, placing it outside the dry belt.
- Option D: Bihar sits in the middle of the wet Gangetic plains and faces seasonal flooding rather than forming part of the western semi-arid tract.
Used: Dry Belt Geographic Mapping
Application: Identifying the central Indian state that contains the eastern extension of the Rajasthan and Gujarat semi-arid dry belt.
Final Logic: The continuous dry tract runs directly from Gujarat into western Madhya Pradesh, making option B the correct choice.
The western dry belt connects three neighboring states: Rajasthan, Gujarat, and western Madhya Pradesh.
19 A geographer observes that North-Rajasthan is largely protected from drought despite being located in an arid zone. What is the reason cited in the text?
Northern Rajasthan is naturally an arid desert region that receives very little rainfall. Despite the dry climate, the area has developed a productive agricultural system. This change was driven by the construction of the Indira Gandhi Canal network.
Geographically, northern Rajasthan is an arid desert that naturally receives very little annual rainfall. However, the region is largely protected from severe agricultural droughts by extensive infrastructure investments, specifically the construction of the Indira Gandhi Canal network. This system brings a reliable supply of surface water from Indus tributaries, protecting local farms from seasonal dry spells and validating option D.
- Option A: This option is incorrect because North Rajasthan has not been transformed into a densely forested region. The text specifically attributes drought protection to irrigation development.
- Option B: This option is incorrect because the region continues to support a substantial rural and agricultural population; drought mitigation is linked to irrigation facilities rather than mass migration.
- Option D: This option is incorrect because North Rajasthan remains an arid region and has not become drought-resistant due to heavy natural precipitation. The improvement is primarily due to irrigation expansion.
Used: Infrastructure Protection Analysis
Application: Finding the specific development factor that protects a naturally dry region from seasonal water shortages.
Final Logic: The text explicitly attributes this protection to developed irrigation networks, making option D the correct choice.
Canal networks bring in outside water, protecting naturally dry desert regions from severe agricultural drought.
20 Match the region with its specific vulnerability status related to drought and irrigation as per the text:
| List I | List II |
|---|---|
| 1. Punjab | A. Largely protected because of extensive canal and tube-well irrigation |
| 2. Marathwada region | B. Frequently affected by drought due to limited irrigation |
| 3. Haryana | C. Reduced dependence on monsoon because of widespread irrigation facilities |
| 4. Interior parts of Tamil Nadu | D. Rain-shadow region with recurring drought conditions |
Irrigation facilities play a major role in determining a region's vulnerability to drought. Punjab and Haryana have extensive canal and tube-well irrigation systems that reduce dependence on rainfall. Marathwada and the interior parts of Tamil Nadu receive comparatively low rainfall and have limited irrigation facilities. These regional differences influenced the implementation of drought-prone area development programmes.
This matching question relates regions to their drought and irrigation characteristics. Punjab (1) is largely protected because of extensive canal and tube-well irrigation (A), which reduces dependence on seasonal rainfall. The Marathwada region (2) is frequently affected by drought due to limited irrigation (B) and its semi-arid location. Haryana (3) has reduced dependence on the monsoon because of widespread irrigation facilities (C), making agriculture comparatively more secure. The interior parts of Tamil Nadu (4) are rain-shadow regions with recurring drought conditions (D) because of low and irregular rainfall. Therefore, the correct matching is 1-A, 2-B, 3-C, 4-D.
- Option A: This option incorrectly classifies Punjab as drought-prone and Marathwada as well irrigated, reversing their actual characteristics.
- Option B: This option exchanges the irrigation status of Punjab and Haryana and incorrectly matches the remaining regions.
- Option D: This option misclassifies both Punjab and Marathwada and reverses the drought characteristics of the listed regions.
Used
- RegionβCharacteristic Classification
Application: Identify whether each region is well irrigated or drought-prone, and then match it with its defining characteristic.
Final Logic: Punjab and Haryana are protected by extensive irrigation, whereas Marathwada and the interior parts of Tamil Nadu experience recurring drought because of limited irrigation and low rainfall, confirming Option C.
Marathwada & Interior Tamil Nadu β Less irrigation β Drought-prone.
