CUET UG Mathematics Booster Test 2 - Minors, Cofactors and Cofactor Expansion
📌 Answers are locked once submitted — results and explanations appear at the end.
QUESTION 1 OF 20
For a 3×3 matrix \(A\) representing vectors in \(R^{3}\), the minor \(M_{ij}\)of an element is related geometrically to:
QUESTION 2 OF 20
Assertion (A): The submatrix used to calculate \(M_{32}\)in a 4×4 matrix is a 3×3 matrix.
Reason (R): Deleting row 3 and column 2 leaves a 2×2 matrix.
QUESTION 3 OF 20
Let
\(A=\left(\begin{pmatrix}x & 1 & 2\\ 1 & x & 3\\ 2 & 3 & x\end{pmatrix}\right)\)
The determinant \(∣A∣\)is a polynomial in \(x\). Find the coefficient of \(x^{2}\).
QUESTION 4 OF 20
For a 3×3 matrix, what is the order of any minor?
QUESTION 5 OF 20
In the cross product of two vectors using determinant form, the components correspond to:
QUESTION 6 OF 20
Arrange the following positions in increasing order of sign factor \({\left(-1\right)}^{\left(i,\ j\right)}\):
1. \(\left(1,\ 2\right)\)
2. \(\left(2,\ 2\right)\)
3. \(\left(2,\ 3\right)\)
4. \(\left(1,\ 1\right)\)
QUESTION 7 OF 20
Let \(S_{n}\)be the sum of all sign factors \({\left(-1\right)}^{\left(i,\ j\right)}\)in an \(n\times n\) matrix.
For \(n=1,2,3,4\), the values of \(S_{n}\)are:
QUESTION 8 OF 20
The positions where \(\left(-1)^{\left(i,\ j\right)}=+1\right.\)in a matrix correspond to:
QUESTION 9 OF 20
Match expressions with meaning:
| List I | List II |
|---|---|
| 1. \(∣A∣=a_{11}A_{11}+a_{12}A_{12}+a_{13}A_{13}\) | a. Column 1 expansion |
| 2. \(a_{11}A_{21}+a_{12}A_{22}+a_{13}A_{23}=0\) | b. Zero property |
| 3. \(∣A∣=a_{11}A_{11}+a_{21}A_{21}+a_{31}A_{31}\) | c. Row 1 expansion |
QUESTION 10 OF 20
Expansion along the \(j^{th}\)column is:
\(∣A∣=\sum_{i=1}^{n}\,a_{ij}A_{ij}\)
Which statements are correct?
1. Reduces an \(n^{th}\)order determinant to \({\left(n-1\right)}^{th}\)order
2. Represents a linear combination of cofactors
3. Depends on the column chosen
QUESTION 11 OF 20
Identify the incorrect statement regarding expansion
\(∣A∣=a_{i1}A_{i1}+a_{i2}A_{i2}+a_{i3}A_{i3}\)
QUESTION 12 OF 20
If \(∣A∣=10\) for a 3×3 matrix, and each element of \(A\) is multiplied by 2, what is the new determinant value?
QUESTION 13 OF 20
If elements of one row are multiplied with cofactors of another row, the sum is zero.
Why does
\(a_{11}A_{21}+a_{12}A_{22}+a_{13}A_{23}=0\)
hold?
QUESTION 14 OF 20
If elements of one row are multiplied with cofactors of another row, the sum is zero.
If a 3×3 matrix has an entire row of zeros, its determinant is best evaluated by:
QUESTION 15 OF 20
For a triangle with vertices on the unit circle at angles \({\theta}_{1},{\theta}_{2},{\theta}_{3}\), the determinant-based area involves expressions of the form:
QUESTION 16 OF 20
For matrix
\(A=\left(\begin{pmatrix}a & b & c\\ d & e & f\\ g & h & i\end{pmatrix}\right),\)
the cofactor \(A_{11}\)is:
QUESTION 17 OF 20
In
\(∣\begin{pmatrix}1 & 2\\ 3 & 4\end{pmatrix}∣,\)
the minor of element 1 is:
QUESTION 18 OF 20
For
\(A=\left(\begin{pmatrix}1 & 2\\ 3 & 4\end{pmatrix}\right),\)
the cofactor matrix is:
QUESTION 19 OF 20
If \(∣A∣=5\) for a 3×3 matrix, find \(∣adj(A)∣\).
QUESTION 20 OF 20
Let \(A\) be a 3×3 diagonal matrix with all diagonal elements equal to 3.
Find the cofactor \(A_{11}\).
Test Complete!
Answer Review
1 For a 3×3 matrix \(A\) representing vectors in \(R^{3}\), the minor \(M_{ij}\)of an element is related geometrically to:
Minor is a 2×2 determinant. 2×2 determinants represent planar area. Remaining vectors form a parallelogram.
In a 3×3 determinant, removing one row and one column leaves a 2×2 determinant called a minor. Geometrically, a 2×2 determinant represents the signed area of a parallelogram formed by two vectors. Hence Option A is correct. Option B corresponds to the full 3×3 determinant, not the minor.
- Option B → Volume of a parallelepiped is represented by the complete 3×3 determinant, not a minor.
- Option C → Minors are determinants, not vector sums.
- Option D → Magnitude of a single vector is unrelated to determinant minors.
Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application:
- Relate determinant order with its geometric interpretation.
Final Logic:
- A 2×2 minor corresponds to planar area geometry.
"Minor → smaller area determinant."
2 Assertion (A): The submatrix used to calculate \(M_{32}\)in a 4×4 matrix is a 3×3 matrix.
Reason (R): Deleting row 3 and column 2 leaves a 2×2 matrix.
Minor reduces order by one. 4×4 minor gives 3×3 submatrix. Reason incorrectly states 2×2 matrix.
To compute \(M_{32}\)in a 4×4 matrix, delete row 3 and column 2. The remaining matrix has order 3×3. Thus Assertion is true. Reason is false because deleting one row and one column from a 4×4 matrix cannot produce a 2×2 matrix. Hence Option B is correct.
- Option A → Assertion is true because order reduces from 4×4 to 3×3.
- Option C → Reason is incorrect, so it cannot explain the Assertion.
- Option D → Assertion is correct since a 3×3 submatrix remains after deletion.
Used: Elimination
Application:
- Use the determinant order reduction rule carefully.
Final Logic:
- Deleting one row and column reduces order by exactly one.
"Minor order = original order − 1."
3 Let
\(A=\left(\begin{pmatrix}x & 1 & 2\\ 1 & x & 3\\ 2 & 3 & x\end{pmatrix}\right)\)
The determinant \(∣A∣\)is a polynomial in \(x\). Find the coefficient of \(x^{2}\).
Expand determinant algebraically. Collect powers of \(x\). Coefficient of \(x^{2}\)becomes 3.
Expanding determinant: \(∣A∣=x(x^{2}-9)-1(x-6)+2(3-2x)=x^{3}-9x-x+6+6-4x=x^{3}-14x+12\) Thus coefficient of \(x^{2}\)is actually 0, not 3. Therefore the provided answer C is incorrect and none of the options are correct.
- Option A → Coefficient of \(x^{2}\)is not 1 after expansion.
- Option B → No quadratic term appears in the determinant polynomial.
- Option C → Expansion incorrectly assumes a nonzero \(x^{2}\)coefficient.
- Option D → Determinant simplification does not generate coefficient 4.
Used: Substitution
Application:
- Expand determinant systematically and compare polynomial coefficients.
Final Logic:
- The determinant polynomial contains no \(x^{2}\)term.
"Expand fully before reading coefficients."
4 For a 3×3 matrix, what is the order of any minor?
Minor removes one row and one column. Order reduces by one. 3×3 becomes 2×2.
A minor is obtained by deleting one row and one column from a matrix. Therefore the order reduces by one. In a 3×3 matrix, every minor is a determinant of order 2×2. Hence Option B is correct. Matrix elements do not affect the order of minors.
- Option A → A 1×1 determinant comes from minors of a 2×2 matrix.
- Option C → Minor cannot retain the original order.
- Option D → Minor order depends only on matrix size, not entries.
Used: Elimination
Application:
- Apply the standard minor-definition rule directly.
Final Logic:
- Deleting one row and column reduces order from 3×3 to 2×2.
"Minor means one order lower."
5 In the cross product of two vectors using determinant form, the components correspond to:
Cross product uses determinant expansion. Unit vectors occupy first row. Components arise from cofactors.
The vector cross product is represented using determinant expansion: \(∣\begin{pmatrix}\hat{i} & \hat{j} & \hat{k}\\ a_{1} & a_{2} & a_{3}\\ b_{1} & b_{2} & b_{3}\end{pmatrix}∣\) The resulting components come from cofactors of the first row containing unit vectors. Hence Option A is correct. Other options do not represent the determinant structure of vector products.
- Option B → Cross-product components are not obtained from second-row minors alone.
- Option C → Determinant expansion is more than simple diagonal multiplication.
- Option D → Cross product is not formed through vector addition.
Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application:
- Connect determinant expansion with vector cross-product representation.
Final Logic:
- Cross-product components arise from first-row cofactors.
"\(\hat{i},\hat{j},\hat{k}\) → cofactor expansion."
6 Arrange the following positions in increasing order of sign factor \({\left(-1\right)}^{\left(i,\ j\right)}\):
1. \(\left(1,\ 2\right)\)
2. \(\left(2,\ 2\right)\)
3. \(\left(2,\ 3\right)\)
4. \(\left(1,\ 1\right)\)
Odd \(i+j\) gives negative sign. Even \(i+j\) gives positive sign. Arrange negatives before positives.
Evaluate signs: \((1,2)\Rightarrow (-1)^{3}=-1(2,3)\Rightarrow (-1)^{5}=-1(1,1)\Rightarrow (-1)^{2}=+1(2,2)\Rightarrow (-1)^{4}=+1\) Thus increasing order is negative values first, then positive values: 1,3,4,2. Hence Option B is correct.
- Option A → Places a positive-sign position before another positive incorrectly.
- Option C → Incorrect ordering among negative-sign positions.
- Option D → Starts with positive-sign entries instead of negative ones.
Used: Substitution
Application:
- Compute \(i+j\) for each position and determine parity.
Final Logic:
- Odd sums give −1 and even sums give +1.
"Odd sum → minus, even sum → plus."
7 Let \(S_{n}\)be the sum of all sign factors \({\left(-1\right)}^{\left(i,\ j\right)}\)in an \(n\times n\) matrix.
For \(n=1,2,3,4\), the values of \(S_{n}\)are:
Checkerboard signs alternate. Even-order matrices balance signs equally. Odd-order matrices leave one extra positive.
The cofactor sign pattern alternates like a checkerboard: \(\begin{pmatrix}+ & - & +\\ - & + & -\\ + & - & +\end{pmatrix}\) For even \(n\), positives and negatives cancel, giving zero. For odd \(n\), one extra positive remains. Hence: \(S_{1}=1, S_{2}=0, S_{3}=1, S_{4}=0\) Thus Option A is correct.
- Option B → \(S_{3}\)is positive 1, not −1.
- Option C → Even-order matrices do not retain positive excess.
- Option D → Odd-order matrices always leave one extra positive term.
Used: Odd One Out
Application:
- Observe checkerboard parity behavior between odd and even orders.
Final Logic:
- Odd orders leave one extra positive sign.
"Odd leaves +1, even cancels."
8 The positions where \(\left(-1)^{\left(i,\ j\right)}=+1\right.\)in a matrix correspond to:
Sign depends on parity of \(i+j\). Even sum gives positive sign. Odd sum gives negative sign.
The cofactor sign rule is: \({\left(-1\right)}^{i+j}\) If \(i+j\) is even, exponent becomes even and sign equals +1. If odd, sign becomes −1. Therefore Option D is correct. Positive signs are not restricted only to diagonal or corner positions.
- Option A → Positive signs also appear outside the diagonal.
- Option B → Corners are not the only positive positions.
- Option C → Positive signs are distributed throughout the checkerboard pattern.
Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application:
- Use parity interpretation of exponent \(i+j\).
Final Logic:
- Even exponent gives positive sign factor.
"Even sum → positive cofactor."
9 Match expressions with meaning:
| List I | List II |
|---|---|
| 1. \(∣A∣=a_{11}A_{11}+a_{12}A_{12}+a_{13}A_{13}\) | a. Column 1 expansion |
| 2. \(a_{11}A_{21}+a_{12}A_{22}+a_{13}A_{23}=0\) | b. Zero property |
| 3. \(∣A∣=a_{11}A_{11}+a_{21}A_{21}+a_{31}A_{31}\) | c. Row 1 expansion |
First expression expands along row 1. Second represents orthogonality-type zero sum. Third expands along column 1.
The first expression uses elements and cofactors from row 1, so it is row-1 expansion. The second expression multiplies elements of one row with cofactors of another, giving zero property. The third expression uses column-1 elements and cofactors. Hence matching becomes: 1–c, 2–b, 3–a.
- Option B → Incorrectly identifies row expansion as column expansion.
- Option C → Misplaces the zero property and row expansion meanings.
- Option D → Third expression clearly represents column expansion, not zero property.
Used: Option Grouping
Application:
- Identify whether indices vary by row or by column in each expression.
Final Logic:
- Fixed first index → row expansion; fixed second index → column expansion.
"Same row indices → row expansion."
10 Expansion along the \(j^{th}\)column is:
\(∣A∣=\sum_{i=1}^{n}\,a_{ij}A_{ij}\)
Which statements are correct?
1. Reduces an \(n^{th}\)order determinant to \({\left(n-1\right)}^{th}\)order
2. Represents a linear combination of cofactors
3. Depends on the column chosen
Cofactor expansion reduces determinant order. Expansion forms linear combination. Determinant value is independent of chosen column.
Cofactor expansion reduces determinant order by one because each cofactor contains an \(\left(n-1)\times (n-1\right)\)minor. It is also a linear combination of elements and cofactors. However, determinant value does not depend on the chosen row or column. Hence statements 1 and 2 are correct, while statement 3 is false.
- Option A → Statement 3 is incorrect because determinant value remains unchanged across columns.
- Option C → Ignores the linear-combination nature of cofactor expansion.
- Option D → Expansion method may vary, but determinant value is independent of column choice.
Used: Elimination
Application:
- Separate determinant value from computational convenience.
Final Logic:
- Expansion row/column changes method, not determinant value.
"Any row, same determinant."
11 Identify the incorrect statement regarding expansion
\(∣A∣=a_{i1}A_{i1}+a_{i2}A_{i2}+a_{i3}A_{i3}\)
Cofactor expansion gives determinant value. Trace is unrelated to determinant expansion. Minors of order 2 appear in 3×3 expansion.
The given expression represents cofactor expansion along the \(i^{th}\)row. Cofactors contain sign factors: \(A_{ij}=(-1)^{i+j}M_{ij}\) Expansion value remains same for every row or column. The process uses second-order minors. However, the sum does not represent the trace of the cofactor matrix. Hence Option C is incorrect.
- Option A → Correct because cofactors always include positional sign factors.
- Option B → Determinant remains invariant under choice of expansion row or column.
- Option D → 3×3 determinant expansion reduces to evaluation of 2×2 minors.
Used: Elimination
Application:
- Separate determinant concepts from unrelated matrix concepts like trace.
Final Logic:
- Trace of cofactor matrix is unrelated to determinant expansion formula.
"Expansion gives determinant, not trace."
12 If \(∣A∣=10\) for a 3×3 matrix, and each element of \(A\) is multiplied by 2, what is the new determinant value?
Scaling affects determinant multiplicatively. For 3×3 matrix, factor becomes \(2^{3}\). New determinant equals \(8\times 10\).
For an \(n\times n\) matrix: \(∣kA∣=k^{n}∣A∣\) For a 3×3 matrix: \(∣2A∣=2^{3}∣A∣=8(10)=80\) Hence Option D is correct. Other options arise from multiplying by incorrect scaling powers.
- Option A → Uses only single multiplication by 2 instead of cubic scaling.
- Option B → Uses incorrect factor \(2^{2}\).
- Option C → Determinant scaling for 3×3 matrices is not linear.
Used: Substitution
Application:
- Apply determinant scaling property directly.
Final Logic:
- \(2^{3}\times 10=80\).
"3×3 matrix → cube the factor."
13
If elements of one row are multiplied with cofactors of another row, the sum is zero.
Why does
\(a_{11}A_{21}+a_{12}A_{22}+a_{13}A_{23}=0\)
hold?
Expansion uses cofactors of another row. Resulting determinant has repeated rows. Determinant with identical rows equals zero.
When elements of one row are multiplied by cofactors of another row, the resulting determinant effectively contains two identical rows. A determinant with identical rows is always zero. Hence: \(a_{11}A_{21}+a_{12}A_{22}+a_{13}A_{23}=0\) Therefore Option A is correct.
- Option B → Sign cancellation alone does not explain the general zero property.
- Option C → Individual minors need not be zero.
- Option D → Cofactors themselves are generally nonzero.
Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application:
- Relate the cofactor identity to repeated-row determinant property.
Final Logic:
- Identical-row determinants always vanish.
"Same rows → determinant zero."
14
If elements of one row are multiplied with cofactors of another row, the sum is zero.
If a 3×3 matrix has an entire row of zeros, its determinant is best evaluated by:
Zero row simplifies cofactor expansion. Every term becomes zero immediately. Determinant directly evaluates to zero.
Expanding along a row containing all zeros is the fastest method because every term in the cofactor expansion becomes zero: \(∣A∣=0\) Thus determinant is obtained instantly without evaluating minors. Hence Option B is correct. Other approaches unnecessarily increase calculations.
- Option A → Column operations are unnecessary when a zero row already exists.
- Option C → Computing minors wastes effort because determinant is immediately zero.
- Option D → Another row may involve nonzero terms and longer calculations.
Used: Elimination
Application:
- Choose the expansion direction minimizing computation.
Final Logic:
- A complete zero row gives determinant zero instantly.
"Expand where zeros live."
15 For a triangle with vertices on the unit circle at angles \({\theta}_{1},{\theta}_{2},{\theta}_{3}\), the determinant-based area involves expressions of the form:
Unit-circle coordinates involve sine and cosine. Area determinants simplify using trig identities. Sine differences naturally appear.
Coordinates on the unit circle are: \(\left(cos\theta ,sin\theta \right)\) When substituted into determinant area formulas, trigonometric simplification produces terms involving: \(sin({\theta}_{i}-{\theta}_{j})\) Hence Option B is correct. Products or simple cosine differences alone do not fully represent determinant-based area expressions.
- Option A → Cosine differences alone are insufficient for determinant area simplification.
- Option C → Product forms do not directly arise from area determinants.
- Option D → Sector area is unrelated to determinant-based triangle area.
Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application:
- Connect unit-circle coordinates with determinant trigonometric identities.
Final Logic:
- Determinant simplification naturally produces sine differences.
"Circle area determinants love sine."
16 For matrix
\(A=\left(\begin{pmatrix}a & b & c\\ d & e & f\\ g & h & i\end{pmatrix}\right),\)
the cofactor \(A_{11}\)is:
Delete row 1 and column 1. Remaining 2×2 determinant gives minor. Sign factor is positive at (1,1).
Deleting row 1 and column 1 leaves: \(∣\begin{pmatrix}e & f\\ h & i\end{pmatrix}∣=ei-fh\) Since: \(\left(-1)^{1+1}=+1\right.\) the cofactor equals: \(A_{11}=ei-fh\) Hence Option A is correct.
- Option B → Reverses determinant subtraction order incorrectly.
- Option C → Uses elements from wrong rows and columns.
- Option D → Duplicate of Option A; mathematically same expression.
Used: Substitution
Application:
- Form the minor first, then apply cofactor sign.
Final Logic:
- Top-left cofactor has positive sign.
"(1,1) starts with plus."
17 In
\(∣\begin{pmatrix}1 & 2\\ 3 & 4\end{pmatrix}∣,\)
the minor of element 1 is:
Remove row and column of element 1. Remaining determinant is 1×1. Minor equals 4.
Element 1 is at position (1,1). Deleting row 1 and column 1 leaves: \(\left[4\right]\) Thus the corresponding minor equals 4. Hence Option A is correct. Other values correspond to remaining matrix elements, not the required minor.
- Option B → Element 2 is removed during minor formation.
- Option C → Element 3 does not remain after deletion.
- Option D → The original element itself is not the minor.
Used: Elimination
Application:
- Delete the row and column containing the target element.
Final Logic:
- Only element 4 survives after deletion.
"Delete row-column, keep leftover."
18 For
\(A=\left(\begin{pmatrix}1 & 2\\ 3 & 4\end{pmatrix}\right),\)
the cofactor matrix is:
Compute minors first. Apply checkerboard sign pattern. Arrange cofactors in same positions.
Minors are: \(M_{11}=4,M_{12}=3,M_{21}=2,M_{22}=1\) Applying signs: \(\left(\begin{pmatrix}+ & -\\ - & +\end{pmatrix}\right)\) gives cofactor matrix: \(\left(\begin{pmatrix}4 & -3\\ -2 & 1\end{pmatrix}\right)\) Hence Option B is correct. The provided answer C is incorrect.
- Option A → Ignores cofactor sign changes completely.
- Option C → Incorrectly swaps signs of off-diagonal cofactors.
- Option D → Original matrix is not equal to its cofactor matrix.
Used: Substitution
Application:
- Calculate minors and apply checkerboard sign rule systematically.
Final Logic:
- Off-diagonal cofactors must be negative.
"Checkerboard signs: + − / − +."
19 If \(∣A∣=5\) for a 3×3 matrix, find \(∣adj(A)∣\).
Use adjoint determinant property. For \(n\times n\) matrix: \(∣adj(A)∣=∣A∣^{n-1}\) Here \(n=3\).
For an \(n\times n\) matrix: \(∣adj(A)∣=∣A∣^{n-1}\) For a 3×3 matrix: \(∣adj(A)∣=5^{2}=25\) Hence Option B is correct. Other options use incorrect exponents or direct copying of determinant value.
- Option A → Uses determinant directly instead of adjoint property.
- Option C → Incorrectly cubes the determinant.
- Option D → Uses exponent four, which is invalid here.
Used: Substitution
Application:
- Apply the standard adjoint-determinant relation carefully.
Final Logic:
- For order 3, exponent becomes 2.
"Adjoint power = \(n-1\)."
20 Let \(A\) be a 3×3 diagonal matrix with all diagonal elements equal to 3.
Find the cofactor \(A_{11}\).
Delete first row and column. Remaining determinant is diagonal 2×2. Cofactor equals product \(3\times 3\).
The matrix is: \(\left(\begin{pmatrix}3 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 3 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 3\end{pmatrix}\right)\) Deleting row 1 and column 1 leaves: \(∣\begin{pmatrix}3 & 0\\ 0 & 3\end{pmatrix}∣=9\) Since sign at position (1,1) is positive, cofactor: \(A_{11}=9\) Hence Option C is correct.
- Option A → Uses only one diagonal entry instead of the determinant of remaining matrix.
- Option B → No determinant computation gives value 6.
- Option D → 27 is the determinant of the whole matrix, not the cofactor.
Used: Substitution
Application:
- Form the required minor by deleting row and column.
Final Logic:
- Remaining 2×2 diagonal determinant equals 9.
"Diagonal minor → multiply leftovers."
