CUET UG Applied Mathematics Booster Test 3 - Properties and Applications of Definite Integrals
π Answers are locked once submitted β results and explanations appear at the end.
QUESTION 1 OF 20
By mathematically examining the foundational algebraic proof behind definite integrals representing independent variables, why does equating β« (from a to b) f(x) dx to exactly F(b) - F(a) effectively render the chosen interior symbolic variable entirely irrelevant to the finalized numerical output?
QUESTION 2 OF 20
Match the specific complex bounded definite integrals evaluated entirely across geometric modulus (absolute value) limits in List I with their verified, rigorously calculated scalar fractional outputs in List II.\
| List I | List II |
|---|---|
| 1. \(\int_{-1}^{2}\,β£x^{3}-xβ£βdx\) | a. \(1\) |
| 2. \(\int_{0}^{4}\,β£x-2β£βdx\) | b. \(4\) |
| 3. \(\int_{0}^{1}\,xe^{x}βdx\) | c. \(\frac{11}{4}\) |
| 4. \(\int_{0}^{3}\,x^{3}βdx\) | d. \(\frac{81}{4}\) |
QUESTION 3 OF 20
When analytically breaking down and perfectly executing the split definite modulus function limits explicitly defined mathematically as
\(\int_{-1}^{2}\,β£x^{3}-xβ£βdx,\)
which exact mathematical breakdown mapping intervals logically and correctly occur?
1. Splitting the absolute interval exactly from β1 to 0 evaluating precisely \(\left(x^{3},\ x\right)\).
2. Splitting the absolute interval exactly from 0 to 1 evaluating precisely \(-(x^{3}-x)\).
3. Splitting the absolute interval exactly from 1 to 2 evaluating precisely \(\left(x^{3},\ x\right)\).
4. Utilizing a completely negative external boundary constraint multiplier constantly everywhere across the interval.
QUESTION 4 OF 20
Which definitive technical mathematical statement mapping the advanced theoretical bounds of the interval addition property limits
\(\int_{a}^{b}\,f(x)βdx=\int_{a}^{b}\,f(a+b-x)βdx\)
is analytically INCORRECT?
QUESTION 5 OF 20
Execute the highly complex rational fraction breakdown specifically mapping exponential parameters evaluated as
\(I=\int_{1}^{5}\,\frac{\sqrt{x}}{\sqrt{x}+\sqrt{6-x}}βdx\)
natively mapped by utilizing the powerful \(a+b-x\) substitution limits property rule.
QUESTION 6 OF 20
Calculate the continuous non-linear fraction limit evaluation heavily utilized for parameter reduction constraints mapping accurately to the logarithmic ratio:
\(\int_{0}^{1}\,\frac{\log\,x}{logβ‘x+logβ‘(1-x)}βdx.\)
QUESTION 7 OF 20
Structurally derive the definitive equivalent mathematical limits expansion utilized explicitly to precisely integrate the continuous exponential fraction compound:
\(\int_{-1}^{1}\,\frac{e^{x}}{e^{x}+e^{-x}}βdx.\)
(Hint: map limits strictly using \(a+b-x\) algebraic boundaries.)
QUESTION 8 OF 20
Analyze and thoroughly evaluate the continuously decaying fractional logarithmic integral inherently forced strictly into an odd symmetry domain logically defined as:
\(\int_{-1}^{1}\,logβ‘\left(\frac{2-x}{2+x}\right)βdx.\)
QUESTION 9 OF 20
Theoretically applying spatial limit mapping properties, if integrating a continuous combined bounded algebraic equation specifically defined as
\(\int_{-a}^{a}\,[f(x)+g(x)]βdx,\)
where \(f(x)\)is mathematically perfectly even and \(g(x)\)is perfectly odd, what explicitly calculates out?
QUESTION 10 OF 20
Systematically evaluate the explicitly bounded interval boundary mapping strictly defining the continuous integral
\(\int_{0}^{\pi }\,xβf(sinβ‘x)βdx\)
using the property \(a-x\) constraints effectively mapped from trigonometry proofs.
QUESTION 11 OF 20
By mathematically executing the exact definite properties of standard geometric limit mapping, a highly elastic market demand curve effectively generates a heavily flattened horizontal slope. How does this specific geometric elasticity influence the theoretical calculated boundaries of Consumers' Surplus?
QUESTION 12 OF 20
Determine the evaluated explicit continuous integration outcome algebraically calculating the Consumers' Surplus limits exclusively evaluated when the market equilibrium price \(p_{0}=40\) for a demand curve mapped identically as
\(p=80-3x-x^{2}.\)
QUESTION 13 OF 20
Conceptually bounding the rigorous analytical limitations of an explicitly non-linear continuous supply function structurally mapped on a graph, what explicitly calculates as the geometric shape boundary mapped exclusively entirely below the equilibrium line \(p_{0}\)?
QUESTION 14 OF 20
Systematically evaluate the definitive numeric bounds mapped explicitly to calculate exact Producers' Surplus structurally utilizing the continuous non-linear quadratic fraction supply curve \(p=4-5x+x^{2}\)specifically when geometric equilibrium price boundaries hit \(p_{0}=18\). (Given \(x_{0}=7\).)
QUESTION 15 OF 20
Calculate the numerically evaluated complex fractional equilibrium integration bounds analytically computing to exactly locate the intersection price \(P\) for explicitly isolated fractional demand mapped as
\(x_{d}=\frac{1400}{3}-\frac{200}{3}P\)
and corresponding supply specifically mapping to
\(x_{s}=\frac{200}{3}P.\)
QUESTION 16 OF 20
Extrapolating entirely mapped linear numeric coefficients for an explicitly bounded inverse function heavily modeling limits specifically establishing equilibrium quantity natively equal to \(x_{0}=10\) from the given firm constraints. If MR = MC continuously at that identical volume parameter, what mathematical metric explicitly reaches absolute maximization?
QUESTION 17 OF 20
QUESTION 18 OF 20
QUESTION 19 OF 20
Extrapolate and thoroughly evaluate the densely mapped definite geometric numerical area explicitly calculating the exact area exclusively lying under the parabolic supply function \(g(x)\)specifically bounded from limits \(x=0\) to \(x=4\).
QUESTION 20 OF 20
Complete the analysis to directly evaluate the fully continuous numeric Producers' Surplus mapped exclusively from substituting all geometric limits explicitly derived directly from the complete mathematical passage data.
Test Complete!
Answer Review
1 By mathematically examining the foundational algebraic proof behind definite integrals representing independent variables, why does equating β« (from a to b) f(x) dx to exactly F(b) - F(a) effectively render the chosen interior symbolic variable entirely irrelevant to the finalized numerical output?
Definite integrals eliminate the dummy variable after evaluation Only limits (a, b) determine final value Variable x is not part of final numerical output
- In β« f(x) dx, the variable x is a dummy variable. β By the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, β«βα΅ f(x)dx = F(b) β F(a). β After substitution, x disappears completely, leaving only constants. β Hence Option A correctly describes the role of x.
- Option B β Antiderivative does not convert variables into constants before integration
- Option C β Long division and integers are irrelevant to definite integrals
- Option D β No concept of curves "remaining identical regardless of boundaries"
Used: Elimination
Application: Remove physically irrelevant algebraic claims and keep only calculus-valid interpretation.
Final Logic: Dummy variable vanishes after applying limits β Option A
"Limits kill variables."
2 Match the specific complex bounded definite integrals evaluated entirely across geometric modulus (absolute value) limits in List I with their verified, rigorously calculated scalar fractional outputs in List II.\
| List I | List II |
|---|---|
| 1. \(\int_{-1}^{2}\,β£x^{3}-xβ£βdx\) | a. \(1\) |
| 2. \(\int_{0}^{4}\,β£x-2β£βdx\) | b. \(4\) |
| 3. \(\int_{0}^{1}\,xe^{x}βdx\) | c. \(\frac{11}{4}\) |
| 4. \(\int_{0}^{3}\,x^{3}βdx\) | d. \(\frac{81}{4}\) |
Evaluate each integral separately. Match each result with List II. Choose the correct correspondence.
The evaluated values are: \(\int_{-1}^{2}\,β£x^{3}-xβ£dx=\frac{11}{4}\) \(\int_{0}^{4}\,β£x-2β£dx=4\) \(\int_{0}^{1}\,xe^{x}dx=1\) \(\int_{0}^{3}\,x^{3}dx=\frac{81}{4}\) Hence, the correct matching is Option A.
- Option B: Incorrectly matches the first and third integrals.
- Option C: Multiple incorrect pairings.
- Option D: Does not satisfy the evaluated values.
Used
- Option Grouping
Application: Evaluate each integral and compare with the listed values.
Final Logic: Only Option A correctly matches all four integrals.
Evaluate β Match β Select
3 When analytically breaking down and perfectly executing the split definite modulus function limits explicitly defined mathematically as
\(\int_{-1}^{2}\,β£x^{3}-xβ£βdx,\)
which exact mathematical breakdown mapping intervals logically and correctly occur?
1. Splitting the absolute interval exactly from β1 to 0 evaluating precisely \(\left(x^{3},\ x\right)\).
2. Splitting the absolute interval exactly from 0 to 1 evaluating precisely \(-(x^{3}-x)\).
3. Splitting the absolute interval exactly from 1 to 2 evaluating precisely \(\left(x^{3},\ x\right)\).
4. Utilizing a completely negative external boundary constraint multiplier constantly everywhere across the interval.
Identify where the expression changes sign. Split at the critical points. Remove the modulus accordingly.
The expression \(x^{3}-x=x(x-1)(x+1)\)changes sign at \(x=-1,0,\)and \(1\). Therefore: On \(\left[-1,0\right]\), use \(\left(x^{3},\ x\right)\). On \(\left[0,\ 1\right]\), use \(-(x^{3}-x)\). On \(\left[1,\ 2\right]\), use \(\left(x^{3},\ x\right)\). Thus, Statements A, B and C are correct.
- Option B: Omits Statement C.
- Option C: Includes incorrect Statement D.
- Option D: Statement D is incorrect.
Used
- Elimination
Application: Check the sign of the function in each interval.
Final Logic: Only A, B and C satisfy the modulus definition.
Split at Sign Changes
4 Which definitive technical mathematical statement mapping the advanced theoretical bounds of the interval addition property limits
\(\int_{a}^{b}\,f(x)βdx=\int_{a}^{b}\,f(a+b-x)βdx\)
is analytically INCORRECT?
The substitution changes only the variable. The definite integral remains unchanged. Area is preserved.
The transformation \(t=a+b-x\) produces an equivalent definite integral and does not change its value. Therefore, the statement claiming that the area is doubled is mathematically incorrect.
- Option A: Correct application of the transformation property.
- Option B: Correct method used in simplifying definite integrals.
- Option C: Correct substitution rule.
Used
- Extreme Word Filter
Application: The claim that the area is "doubled" is mathematically false.
Final Logic: The substitution preserves the value of the definite integral.
Substitute, Preserve Value
5 Execute the highly complex rational fraction breakdown specifically mapping exponential parameters evaluated as
\(I=\int_{1}^{5}\,\frac{\sqrt{x}}{\sqrt{x}+\sqrt{6-x}}βdx\)
natively mapped by utilizing the powerful \(a+b-x\) substitution limits property rule.
Apply the substitution \(x=6-x\). Add the transformed integral. Solve for \(I\).
Using the substitution, \(I=\int_{1}^{5}\,\frac{\sqrt{6-x}}{\sqrt{x}+\sqrt{6-x}}βdx.\) Adding the original and transformed integrals, \(2I=\int_{1}^{5}\,1βdx=4.\) Hence, \(I=2.\) Therefore, the correct answer is Option C.
- Option A: Incorrect numerical value.
- Option B: Equals the interval length.
- Option D: The integral is positive and cannot be zero.
Used
- Substitution
Application: Use the transformation \(x=a+b-x\) to simplify the integral.
Final Logic: Complementary fractions add to 1, giving \(2I=4\).
Complementary Fractions β Half the Interval
6 Calculate the continuous non-linear fraction limit evaluation heavily utilized for parameter reduction constraints mapping accurately to the logarithmic ratio:
\(\int_{0}^{1}\,\frac{\log\,x}{logβ‘x+logβ‘(1-x)}βdx.\)
Apply the property \(x\rightarrow 1-x\). Add the transformed integral. Solve for the value.
Let \(I=\int_{0}^{1}\,\frac{\log\,x}{logβ‘x+logβ‘(1-x)}βdx.\) Using the substitution \(x=1-x\), \(I=\int_{0}^{1}\,\frac{logβ‘(1-x)}{logβ‘x+logβ‘(1-x)}βdx.\) Adding the two equations, \(2I=\int_{0}^{1}\,1βdx=1.\) Hence, \(I=\frac{1}{2}.\)
- Option A: Twice the correct value.
- Option C: The integral is not zero.
- Option D: Exceeds the interval value.
Used
- Substitution
Application: Use the transformation \(x=1-x\).
Final Logic: Symmetry gives \(2I=1\).
Symmetry β Half
7 Structurally derive the definitive equivalent mathematical limits expansion utilized explicitly to precisely integrate the continuous exponential fraction compound:
\(\int_{-1}^{1}\,\frac{e^{x}}{e^{x}+e^{-x}}βdx.\)
(Hint: map limits strictly using \(a+b-x\) algebraic boundaries.)
Apply symmetry. Transform the integral. Add complementary expressions.
Using the substitution \(x\rightarrow -x\), \(I=\int_{-1}^{1}\,\frac{e^{-x}}{e^{x}+e^{-x}}βdx.\) Adding, \(2I=\int_{-1}^{1}\,1βdx=2.\) Therefore, \(I=1.\) With the required option arrangement, the correct choice is Option D.
- Option A: Incorrect value.
- Option B: Integral is positive.
- Option C: Original position before shuffling.
Used
- Substitution
Application: Replace \(x\) by \(-x\).
Final Logic: Complementary fractions sum to 1.
Complementary Fractions Add to One
8 Analyze and thoroughly evaluate the continuously decaying fractional logarithmic integral inherently forced strictly into an odd symmetry domain logically defined as:
\(\int_{-1}^{1}\,logβ‘\left(\frac{2-x}{2+x}\right)βdx.\)
Recognize the odd function. Use symmetric limits. Apply the odd-function property.
The function \(\log\,\left(\frac{2-x}{2+x}\right)\) is odd. Therefore, \(\int_{-1}^{1}\,f(x)βdx=0.\) Hence, the correct answer is Option B.
- Option A: Incorrect value.
- Option C: Integral cancels completely.
- Option D: Incorrect evaluation.
Used
- Elimination
Application: Identify the odd-function symmetry.
Final Logic: Odd function over symmetric limits gives zero.
Odd + Symmetric = Zero
9 Theoretically applying spatial limit mapping properties, if integrating a continuous combined bounded algebraic equation specifically defined as
\(\int_{-a}^{a}\,[f(x)+g(x)]βdx,\)
where \(f(x)\)is mathematically perfectly even and \(g(x)\)is perfectly odd, what explicitly calculates out?
Odd part cancels. Even part doubles. Apply symmetry.
Since \(f(x)\)is even, \(g(x)\)is odd, \(\int_{-a}^{a}\,g(x)βdx=0\) and \(\int_{-a}^{a}\,f(x)βdx=2\int_{0}^{a}\,f(x)βdx.\) Thus, \(\int_{-a}^{a}\,[f(x)+g(x)]βdx=2\int_{0}^{a}\,f(x)βdx.\)
- Option B: Ignores the even part.
- Option C: Includes the odd component.
- Option D: Odd part integrates to zero.
Used
- Elimination
Application: Separate even and odd functions.
Final Logic: Even doubles, odd cancels.
Even Doubles, Odd Vanishes
10 Systematically evaluate the explicitly bounded interval boundary mapping strictly defining the continuous integral
\(\int_{0}^{\pi }\,xβf(sinβ‘x)βdx\)
using the property \(a-x\) constraints effectively mapped from trigonometry proofs.
Apply the substitution \(x\rightarrow \pi -x\). Add the transformed integral. Simplify.
Using the substitution, \(I=\int_{0}^{\pi }\,(\pi -x)f(sinβ‘x)βdx.\) Adding both forms, \(2I=\pi \int_{0}^{\pi }\,f(sinβ‘x)βdx.\) Therefore, \(I=\frac{\pi }{2}\int_{0}^{\pi }\,f(sinβ‘x)βdx.\) Hence, the correct answer is Option C.
- Option A: Incorrect property.
- Option B: Integral is not zero.
- Option D: Missing the factor \(\frac{1}{2}\).
Used
- Substitution
Application: Apply the transformation \(x\rightarrow \pi -x\).
Final Logic: Combine the two equivalent integrals.
\(x+(\pi -x)=\pi\)
11 By mathematically executing the exact definite properties of standard geometric limit mapping, a highly elastic market demand curve effectively generates a heavily flattened horizontal slope. How does this specific geometric elasticity influence the theoretical calculated boundaries of Consumers' Surplus?
Greater elasticity flattens the demand curve. Consumers' Surplus decreases. The bounded area approaches zero.
As the demand curve becomes increasingly horizontal, consumers become less willing to pay above the market price. Hence, the Consumers' Surplus region becomes very small and theoretically approaches zero.
- Option A: Consumers' Surplus does not become infinite.
- Option C: Consumers' Surplus never converts into Producers' Surplus.
- Option D: Consumers' Surplus does not become a negative area.
Used
- Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application: Relate demand elasticity to the geometric interpretation of Consumers' Surplus.
Final Logic: A flatter demand curve reduces the surplus area.
Flat Demand β Small CS
12 Determine the evaluated explicit continuous integration outcome algebraically calculating the Consumers' Surplus limits exclusively evaluated when the market equilibrium price \(p_{0}=40\) for a demand curve mapped identically as
\(p=80-3x-x^{2}.\)
Find the equilibrium quantity. Compute the area under the demand curve. Subtract the rectangle area.
Using the Consumers' Surplus formula, \(CS=\int_{0}^{x_{0}}\,f(x)βdx-p_{0}x_{0},\) the evaluated result is \(\frac{116}{3}.\)
- Option A: Incorrect evaluation.
- Option B: Incorrect area.
- Option C: Rectangle area only.
Used
- Substitution
Application: Apply the Consumers' Surplus formula using the given demand function.
Final Logic: Area under the demand curve minus the revenue rectangle.
CS = Area β Rectangle
13 Conceptually bounding the rigorous analytical limitations of an explicitly non-linear continuous supply function structurally mapped on a graph, what explicitly calculates as the geometric shape boundary mapped exclusively entirely below the equilibrium line \(p_{0}\)?
Identify the region below the equilibrium line. Relate it to the supply curve. Choose the correct geometric interpretation.
According to the required option arrangement, the correct answer is Option C.
- Option A: Incorrect interpretation.
- Option B: Consumer deficit is unrelated.
- Option D: Negative revenues are not represented.
Used
- Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application: Match the graph interpretation with the economic concept.
Final Logic: The required option is identified from the given arrangement.
Supply Curve β PS Region
14 Systematically evaluate the definitive numeric bounds mapped explicitly to calculate exact Producers' Surplus structurally utilizing the continuous non-linear quadratic fraction supply curve \(p=4-5x+x^{2}\)specifically when geometric equilibrium price boundaries hit \(p_{0}=18\). (Given \(x_{0}=7\).)
Calculate the rectangle area. Evaluate the area under the supply curve. Producers' Surplus = Rectangle β Area under supply curve.
The Producers' Surplus is obtained using \(PS=p_{0}x_{0}-\int_{0}^{x_{0}}\,(4-5x+x^{2})βdx.\) Evaluating the definite integral and subtracting it from the revenue rectangle gives \(\frac{539}{6}.\) Hence, Option A is correct.
- Option B: Incorrect numerical evaluation of the surplus.
- Option C: Represents an incorrect calculation.
- Option D: Does not satisfy the Producers' Surplus formula.
Used
- Substitution
Application: Apply the Producers' Surplus formula directly.
Final Logic: Rectangle area minus the area under the supply curve.
PS = Rectangle β Curve
15 Calculate the numerically evaluated complex fractional equilibrium integration bounds analytically computing to exactly locate the intersection price \(P\) for explicitly isolated fractional demand mapped as
\(x_{d}=\frac{1400}{3}-\frac{200}{3}P\)
and corresponding supply specifically mapping to
\(x_{s}=\frac{200}{3}P.\)
Set Demand = Supply. Solve the equation. Obtain equilibrium price.
At equilibrium, \(\frac{1400}{3}-\frac{200}{3}P=\frac{200}{3}P.\) Therefore, \(1400=400PP=\frac{1400}{400}=\frac{7}{2}.\) Hence, Option B is correct.
- Option A: Incorrect solution.
- Option C: Does not satisfy the equilibrium equation.
- Option D: Incorrect value.
Used
- Substitution
Application: Equate demand and supply.
Final Logic: Solve the resulting linear equation.
Demand = Supply
16 Extrapolating entirely mapped linear numeric coefficients for an explicitly bounded inverse function heavily modeling limits specifically establishing equilibrium quantity natively equal to \(x_{0}=10\) from the given firm constraints. If MR = MC continuously at that identical volume parameter, what mathematical metric explicitly reaches absolute maximization?
Profit is maximized where MR = MC. This is the standard optimization condition. Widely used in economics.
A firm's profit reaches its maximum when \(MR=MC.\) Therefore, the quantity where MR equals MC maximizes the Total Profit Function. Hence, Option D is correct.
- Option A: Depreciation is unrelated to profit maximization.
- Option B: Average cost is not maximized at MR = MC.
- Option C: Marginal deficit is not an optimization criterion.
Used
- Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application: Recall the standard economic condition for profit maximization.
Final Logic: MR = MC β Maximum Profit.
MR = MC β Maximum Profit
17
Substitute \(x_{0}=4\). Use the supply equation. Obtain equilibrium price.
Using \(p=3x^{2}+10,\) at \(x=4\), \(p_{0}=3(4)^{2}+10=48+10=58.\) Hence, Option C is correct.
- Option A: Incorrect substitution.
- Option B: Incorrect computation.
- Option D: Represents only the constant term.
Used
- Substitution
Application: Substitute the equilibrium quantity into the supply function.
Final Logic: Direct substitution gives the equilibrium price.
Substitute \(x_{0}\)into Supply Curve
18
Find the equilibrium price. Multiply by the equilibrium quantity. Obtain the rectangle area.
From Question 17, \(p_{0}=58,x_{0}=4.\) Therefore, \(p_{0}x_{0}=58\times 4=232.\) Hence, the gross rectangular boundary area is 232.
- Option A: Represents the Producers' Surplus, not the rectangle area.
- Option C: Represents the area under the supply curve.
- Option D: Incorrect multiplication.
Used
- Substitution
Application: Substitute the equilibrium values into \(p_{0}x_{0}\).
Final Logic: Rectangle Area = Price Γ Quantity.
Rectangle = Price Γ Quantity
19 Extrapolate and thoroughly evaluate the densely mapped definite geometric numerical area explicitly calculating the exact area exclusively lying under the parabolic supply function \(g(x)\)specifically bounded from limits \(x=0\) to \(x=4\).
Integrate the supply function. Apply the limits. Obtain the area under the curve.
The required area is \(\int_{0}^{4}\,(3x^{2}+10)βdx.\) Evaluating, \({\left[x^{3},\ 10x\right]}_{0}^{4}=64+40=104.\) Hence, the area under the supply curve is 104.
- Option B: Rectangle area, not the integral.
- Option C: Producers' Surplus.
- Option D: Incorrect evaluation.
Used
- Substitution
Application: Integrate the supply function over the given interval.
Final Logic: Evaluate the antiderivative using the limits.
Area Under Curve = Definite Integral
20 Complete the analysis to directly evaluate the fully continuous numeric Producers' Surplus mapped exclusively from substituting all geometric limits explicitly derived directly from the complete mathematical passage data.
Compute the rectangle area. Compute the area under the supply curve. Subtract the two areas.
Using \(RectangleΒ Area=232,\) and \(AreaΒ underΒ SupplyΒ Curve=104,\) the Producers' Surplus is \(232-104=128.\) Hence, Option D is correct.
- Option A: Incorrect numerical value.
- Option B: Rectangle area only.
- Option C: Area under the supply curve only.
Used
- Substitution
Application: Apply the Producers' Surplus formula.
Final Logic: Producers' Surplus = Rectangle Area β Area Under Supply Curve.
PS = Rectangle β Curve
