CUET UG Physics Booster Test 3-Alpha-Particle Scattering
📌 Answers are locked once submitted — results and explanations appear at the end.
QUESTION 1 OF 20
The classic experiment proposed by Rutherford in 1906
Choose correct:
QUESTION 2 OF 20
Incorrect statement regarding the historical timeline and roles in atomic models:
QUESTION 3 OF 20
Match List I (Apparatus part) with List II (Analytical Function/Condition)
| List I | List II |
|---|---|
| 1. Vacuum Chamber | a. Environment containing the entire scattering apparatus |
| 2. Lead bricks | b. Shapes the emitted alpha-particles into a concentrated narrow beam |
| 3. Radioactive Source | c. Decays to continuously emit 5.5 MeV alpha particles |
| 4. Rotatable detector | d. Allows empirical measurement of particle distribution at varying angles θ |
QUESTION 4 OF 20
The distance of closest approach d for an alpha particle in a head-on collision is mathematically established by equating its initial kinetic energy (K) to its final electrostatic potential energy. Which expression precisely defines d?
QUESTION 5 OF 20
Correct analytical statements concerning the radioactive source:
1. It was a specific isotope of Bismuth, designated as ²¹⁴₈₃Bi.
2. It served as the origin point for alpha-particles carrying 5.5 MeV of kinetic energy.
3. The maximum theoretical kinetic energy found in alpha particles of natural origin is 7.7 MeV.
4. It emitted dense continuous X-ray spectra that interfered with the zinc sulphide screen.
QUESTION 6 OF 20
The gold foil target must be exceptionally ________ so that physicists can reliably assume the traversing alpha-particles suffer not more than ________ scattering event during their passage.
QUESTION 7 OF 20
Statements critically evaluating the detection methodology:
1. The detector fundamentally requires a zinc sulphide screen paired with a microscope.
2. Its rotatability is crucial for mapping scattering magnitude as a function of angle.
3. Individual impact flashes are brief but distinctly viewable through the microscope optics.
4. It electrically counts the exact number of atomic electrons displaced by the collision.
QUESTION 8 OF 20
If statistically 1 in 8000 particles deflects by more than 90° causing a flash on the far sides of the detector, what is this specific probability expressed as a decimal fraction?
QUESTION 9 OF 20
In analyzing the graph detailing the angular distribution of scattered particles,
QUESTION 10 OF 20
Match List I with List II representing Rutherford's statistical scattering data.
| List I | List II |
|---|---|
| 1. Scattered by more than 1° | a. Approximately 0.14% of incidence |
| 2. Scattered by more than 90° | b. Statistically 1 in 8000 occurrences |
| 3. Passes through with no collision | c. Behavior of the overwhelming majority |
| 4. Distribution mapping | d. Studied intricately as a function of angle θ |
QUESTION 11 OF 20
If N represents the total number of incident alpha-particles, the mathematical expectation for the number of particles passing forward without exceeding a 1° deflection is analytically approximated by:
QUESTION 12 OF 20
The extreme rarity of alpha particles deflecting by massive angles mathematically implies that
Statements:
1. The atom's positive charge is tightly concentrated in a volume vastly smaller than the atom.
2. The atom behaves strictly as a solid sphere of uniform mass and charge density.
3. Alpha particles are heavily attracted and absorbed into the nucleus via strong force.
4. Planetary electrons play the dominant role in back-scattering the alpha particles.
QUESTION 13 OF 20
Given the orbital radius of the earth is ~ 1.5 × 10¹¹ m and the sun's radius is 7 × 10⁸ m. If the solar system's dimensions were proportionally scaled to match the empty space ratio of an atom (roughly 10⁵), what would the earth's new orbital radius algebraically become?
QUESTION 14 OF 20
The determining force drastically altering the path of an incoming alpha-particle is heavily ________ and acts in strict accordance with ________ law.
QUESTION 15 OF 20
Identify the incorrect statement derived from Rutherford's atomic dimensions analysis:
QUESTION 16 OF 20
Analytical statements regarding the conceptual "empty space" in an atom:
1. Most of an atom's volume is empty space, explaining the high forward transmission rate of alpha-particles.
2. The nuclear atom implies it contains a much greater fraction of empty space than our solar system does.
3. A given alpha-particle rarely comes near enough to a nucleus to encounter the intense electric field.
4. The empty space is permeated by a positively charged jelly-like substance.
QUESTION 17 OF 20
Match List I to List II concerning the mechanics of a single scattering interaction.
| List I | List II |
|---|---|
| 1. Intense localized electric field | a. Sufficiently strong to scatter passing particles through large angles |
| 2. Extremely light atomic electrons | b. Do not possess the inertia to appreciably affect passing alpha-particles |
| 3. Heavy gold nucleus (Z = 79) | c. Assumed stationary due to being ~50 times heavier than the projectile |
| 4. Alpha-particle charge profile | d. Two units of positive charge (+2e) |
QUESTION 18 OF 20
Statements fundamentally explaining why atomic electrons are neglected in the formal trajectory computation:
1. They possess an insignificantly small mass compared to the highly massive alpha particles.
2. They lack the momentum required to appreciably deflect the incoming projectile's path.
3. The dominant scattering force is overwhelmingly provided by the massive, concentrated positive nucleus.
4. Their negative charge perfectly neutralises the nuclear charge precisely at the minimum impact parameter.
QUESTION 19 OF 20
In establishing the strict mathematical computation of an alpha-particle's trajectory,
QUESTION 20 OF 20
In evaluating the closest approach distance during a theoretical head-on collision,
Test Complete!
Answer Review
1 The classic experiment proposed by Rutherford in 1906
Choose correct:
�� Rutherford wanted to probe atomic structure. �� Alpha particles were used as probes. �� The experiment was unrelated to Balmer's formula.
Statement A is correct because Rutherford proposed alpha-particle scattering to determine the internal arrangement of positive charge and electrons within atoms. Statements B, C and D are incorrect. The experiment eventually disproved Thomson's model, was not designed to test Balmer's formula, and was unrelated to the study of emission spectra. Therefore, only statement A is correct.
- �� Option B → Statement C is incorrect.
- �� Option C → Statement C is incorrect.
- �� Option D → Both statements B and D are incorrect.
Used
- Elimination
Application:
- Check the original objective of Rutherford's proposal.
Final Logic:
- The experiment was designed to investigate atomic structure.
Alpha Probe → Atom Structure
2 Incorrect statement regarding the historical timeline and roles in atomic models:
�� Rutherford proposed the experiment. �� Geiger and Marsden performed it. �� Thomson supervised Rutherford earlier.
Rutherford did not perform the entire experiment alone. He proposed the experiment, while Hans Geiger and Ernest Marsden carried out the actual scattering measurements around 1911. Therefore, option A is correct.
- �� Option B → Correct historical statement.
- �� Option C → Correct description of the experimenters.
- �� Option D → Correct historical relationship.
Used
- Odd One Out
Application:
- Identify the historically inaccurate statement.
Final Logic:
- Rutherford proposed the experiment but did not perform it alone.
Rutherford Planned, Geiger-Marsden Measured
3 Match List I (Apparatus part) with List II (Analytical Function/Condition)
| List I | List II |
|---|---|
| 1. Vacuum Chamber | a. Environment containing the entire scattering apparatus |
| 2. Lead bricks | b. Shapes the emitted alpha-particles into a concentrated narrow beam |
| 3. Radioactive Source | c. Decays to continuously emit 5.5 MeV alpha particles |
| 4. Rotatable detector | d. Allows empirical measurement of particle distribution at varying angles θ |
�� Vacuum prevents unwanted collisions. �� Lead bricks collimate the beam. �� Detector measures angular distribution.
1 → a : Vacuum chamber contains the entire apparatus. 2 → b : Lead bricks collimate alpha particles. 3 → c : Radioactive source emits 5.5 MeV alpha particles. 4 → d : Rotatable detector records scattering at different angles. Therefore, option B is correct.
- �� Option A → Multiple mismatches.
- �� Option C → Incorrect matching of detector and source.
- �� Option D → Incorrect assignment of apparatus functions.
Used
- Option Grouping
Application:
- Match each apparatus component with its function.
Final Logic:
- Only option B correctly matches all pairs.
Vacuum–Lead–Source–Detector
4 The distance of closest approach d for an alpha particle in a head-on collision is mathematically established by equating its initial kinetic energy (K) to its final electrostatic potential energy. Which expression precisely defines d?
�� At closest approach, KE becomes PE. �� Coulomb repulsion stops the alpha particle. �� Energy conservation is applied.
For a head-on collision, K = (1/4πε₀)(2Ze²/d) Rearranging, d = (2Ze²)/(4πε₀K) Thus, option D is correct.
- �� Option A → Incorrect dimensions and relation.
- �� Option B → Missing factor 2.
- �� Option C → Extra factor 2.
Used
- Substitution
Application:
- Apply energy conservation and Coulomb potential energy.
Final Logic:
- KE = PE gives d = (2Ze²)/(4πε₀K).
Closest Approach → KE = PE
5 Correct analytical statements concerning the radioactive source:
1. It was a specific isotope of Bismuth, designated as ²¹⁴₈₃Bi.
2. It served as the origin point for alpha-particles carrying 5.5 MeV of kinetic energy.
3. The maximum theoretical kinetic energy found in alpha particles of natural origin is 7.7 MeV.
4. It emitted dense continuous X-ray spectra that interfered with the zinc sulphide screen.
�� Bismuth source emitted alpha particles. �� Alpha energy was 5.5 MeV. �� Natural alpha energies can reach 7.7 MeV.
Statements 1, 2 and 3 are correct descriptions of the source and alpha-particle energies used in Rutherford's analysis. Statement 4 is incorrect because continuous X-ray interference was not a feature of the experiment. Therefore, statements 1, 2 and 3 are correct.
- �� Option B → Includes statement 4, which is incorrect.
- �� Option C → Includes statement 4, which is incorrect.
- �� Option D → Includes statement 4, which is incorrect.
Used
- Elimination
Application:
- Evaluate each statement using experimental facts.
Final Logic:
- Only statements 1, 2 and 3 are correct.
Bi Source → 5.5 MeV
6 The gold foil target must be exceptionally ________ so that physicists can reliably assume the traversing alpha-particles suffer not more than ________ scattering event during their passage.
�� Thin foil minimizes repeated collisions. �� Single-scattering assumption is important. �� Simplifies theoretical analysis.
The gold foil was made extremely thin so that most alpha particles would experience at most one significant scattering event. This assumption is essential for Rutherford's theoretical calculations. Therefore, option C is correct.
- �� Option A → Zero scattering is not assumed.
- �� Option B → Opposite of the experimental requirement.
- �� Option D → Charge and elasticity are irrelevant here.
Used
- Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application:
- Relate foil properties to scattering assumptions.
Final Logic:
- Thin foil ensures predominantly single scattering.
Thin Foil → One Scatter
7 Statements critically evaluating the detection methodology:
1. The detector fundamentally requires a zinc sulphide screen paired with a microscope.
2. Its rotatability is crucial for mapping scattering magnitude as a function of angle.
3. Individual impact flashes are brief but distinctly viewable through the microscope optics.
4. It electrically counts the exact number of atomic electrons displaced by the collision.
�� ZnS screen detects alpha particles. �� Microscope views scintillations. �� Rotation allows angular measurements.
Statements 1, 2 and 3 accurately describe the Geiger-Marsden detector. Statement 4 is incorrect because the apparatus observed scintillations and did not count displaced electrons. Therefore, statements 1, 2 and 3 are correct.
- �� Option B → Includes statement 4, which is incorrect.
- �� Option C → Includes statement 4, which is incorrect.
- �� Option D → Includes statement 4, which is incorrect.
Used
- Elimination
Application:
- Check actual detector functions.
Final Logic:
- Only statements 1, 2 and 3 describe the apparatus correctly.
ZnS + Microscope + Rotation
8 If statistically 1 in 8000 particles deflects by more than 90° causing a flash on the far sides of the detector, what is this specific probability expressed as a decimal fraction?
�� Probability = Favorable/Total. �� Here it is 1/8000. �� Convert directly to decimal.
Probability = 1/8000 = 0.000125 Therefore, option B is correct.
- �� Option A → Equal to 1/800.
- �� Option C → Equal to 1/80.
- �� Option D → Equal to 1/8.
Used
- Substitution
Application:
- Convert the given fraction into decimal form.
Final Logic:
- 1 ÷ 8000 = 0.000125.
1/8000 → Five Zeros
9 In analyzing the graph detailing the angular distribution of scattered particles,
�� Dots represent observations. �� Curve represents theory. �� Agreement supports the nuclear model.
In Rutherford scattering plots, experimental measurements are shown as data points, while the theoretical nuclear-model prediction appears as a smooth curve. Their agreement strongly supports the nuclear model. Therefore, option A is correct.
- �� Option B → Incorrect interpretation of graph elements.
- �� Option C → Particle count decreases with increasing angle.
- �� Option D → Backscattering is extremely rare.
Used
- Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application:
- Identify the meaning of graph components.
Final Logic:
- Dots = data, Curve = theory.
Dots Data, Curve Theory
10 Match List I with List II representing Rutherford's statistical scattering data.
| List I | List II |
|---|---|
| 1. Scattered by more than 1° | a. Approximately 0.14% of incidence |
| 2. Scattered by more than 90° | b. Statistically 1 in 8000 occurrences |
| 3. Passes through with no collision | c. Behavior of the overwhelming majority |
| 4. Distribution mapping | d. Studied intricately as a function of angle θ |
�� Small-angle scattering is uncommon. �� Large-angle scattering is very rare. �� Most particles pass through unaffected.
1 → a : About 0.14% scatter by more than 1°. 2 → b : About 1 in 8000 scatter by more than 90°. 3 → c : Most particles pass straight through. 4 → d : Distribution was studied as a function of scattering angle θ. Therefore, option A is correct.
- �� Option B → Incorrect probability assignments.
- �� Option C → Multiple mismatches.
- �� Option D → Incorrect statistical associations.
Used
- Option Grouping
Application:
- Match each scattering observation with its statistical result.
Final Logic:
- Only option A correctly matches all entries.
0.14%, 1/8000, Straight, θ
11 If N represents the total number of incident alpha-particles, the mathematical expectation for the number of particles passing forward without exceeding a 1° deflection is analytically approximated by:
�� About 0.14% scatter by more than 1°. �� The remaining particles undergo less than 1° deflection. �� Use complement probability.
Experimental observations show that approximately 0.14% = 0.0014 of alpha particles scatter by more than 1°. Therefore, the fraction not exceeding 1° is: 1 − 0.0014 = 0.9986 Hence, the expected number is: N × (1 − 0.0014) Therefore, option B is correct.
- �� Option A → Represents particles scattered by more than 1°.
- �� Option C → Represents particles scattered by more than 90°.
- �� Option D → Uses 14% instead of 0.14%.
Used
- Substitution
Application:
- Use the complementary probability of scattering greater than 1°.
Final Logic:
- Forward transmission ≈ Total particles − strongly scattered particles.
Forward = 100% − 0.14%
12 The extreme rarity of alpha particles deflecting by massive angles mathematically implies that
Statements:
1. The atom's positive charge is tightly concentrated in a volume vastly smaller than the atom.
2. The atom behaves strictly as a solid sphere of uniform mass and charge density.
3. Alpha particles are heavily attracted and absorbed into the nucleus via strong force.
4. Planetary electrons play the dominant role in back-scattering the alpha particles.
�� Large deflections are rare. �� Positive charge is concentrated. �� Thomson's model cannot explain observations.
Statement 1 is correct because rare large-angle scattering indicates a tiny, dense, positively charged nucleus. Statements 2, 3 and 4 are incorrect. Uniform charge distribution cannot produce the observed scattering, alpha particles are repelled rather than absorbed, and electrons contribute negligibly. Therefore, only statement 1 is correct.
- �� Option B → Statements 2 and 4 are incorrect.
- �� Option C → Statement 3 is incorrect.
- �� Option D → Includes multiple incorrect statements.
Used
- Elimination
Application:
- Relate scattering frequency to atomic structure.
Final Logic:
- Rare backscattering implies a tiny concentrated nucleus.
Rare Scatter → Tiny Nucleus
13 Given the orbital radius of the earth is ~ 1.5 × 10¹¹ m and the sun's radius is 7 × 10⁸ m. If the solar system's dimensions were proportionally scaled to match the empty space ratio of an atom (roughly 10⁵), what would the earth's new orbital radius algebraically become?
�� Atomic empty-space ratio ≈ 10⁵. �� Solar ratio ≈ 1.5 × 10¹¹ / 7 × 10⁸ ≈ 214. �� Scale accordingly.
To achieve an atom-like ratio: New orbital radius = (10⁵) × (Sun radius) = (10⁵)(7 × 10⁸) = 7 × 10¹³ m Therefore, option D is correct.
- �� Option A → Does not satisfy the required ratio.
- �� Option B → Incorrect scaling.
- �� Option C → Far too small.
Used
- Substitution
Application:
- Apply the required empty-space ratio directly.
Final Logic:
- 10⁵ × 7 × 10⁸ = 7 × 10¹³ m.
Atomic Ratio = 10⁵
14 The determining force drastically altering the path of an incoming alpha-particle is heavily ________ and acts in strict accordance with ________ law.
�� Both nucleus and alpha particle are positive. �� Like charges repel. �� Coulomb's law governs the interaction.
The gold nucleus carries charge +Ze and the alpha particle carries charge +2e. The interaction is therefore electrostatic repulsion described by Coulomb's law. Hence, option A is correct.
- �� Option B → Interaction is not attractive.
- �� Option C → No neutral force exists here.
- �� Option D → Scattering is not governed by Ampere's law.
Used
- Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application:
- Identify the physical force responsible for scattering.
Final Logic:
- Positive charges repel according to Coulomb's law.
and + → Repel
15 Identify the incorrect statement derived from Rutherford's atomic dimensions analysis:
�� Rutherford estimated only an upper limit. �� Nuclear radius was not measured exactly. �� Atomic size was already known.
Rutherford's analysis provided only an upper limit on nuclear dimensions. It did not establish an exact nuclear radius of 30 fm. Statements B, C and D are consistent with the conclusions of Rutherford's analysis. Therefore, option A is correct.
- �� Option B → Correct order of magnitude.
- �� Option C → Correct interpretation of closest approach.
- �� Option D → Correct atomic dimension estimate.
Used
- Extreme Word Filter
Application:
- Watch for absolute terms such as "exactly established."
Final Logic:
- Rutherford estimated limits, not exact nuclear radii.
Upper Limit ≠ Exact Radius
16 Analytical statements regarding the conceptual "empty space" in an atom:
1. Most of an atom's volume is empty space, explaining the high forward transmission rate of alpha-particles.
2. The nuclear atom implies it contains a much greater fraction of empty space than our solar system does.
3. A given alpha-particle rarely comes near enough to a nucleus to encounter the intense electric field.
4. The empty space is permeated by a positively charged jelly-like substance.
�� Most atomic volume is empty. �� Nuclear model implies enormous emptiness. �� Close nuclear encounters are rare.
Statements 1, 2 and 3 follow directly from Rutherford's nuclear model. Statement 4 describes Thomson's plum pudding model, not Rutherford's model. Therefore, statements 1, 2 and 3 are correct.
- �� Option B → Includes statement 4, which is incorrect.
- �� Option C → Includes statement 4, which is incorrect.
- �� Option D → Includes statement 4, which is incorrect.
Used
- Elimination
Application:
- Separate Rutherford's model from Thomson's model.
Final Logic:
- Positive jelly belongs to the plum pudding model.
Rutherford = Empty Space
17 Match List I to List II concerning the mechanics of a single scattering interaction.
| List I | List II |
|---|---|
| 1. Intense localized electric field | a. Sufficiently strong to scatter passing particles through large angles |
| 2. Extremely light atomic electrons | b. Do not possess the inertia to appreciably affect passing alpha-particles |
| 3. Heavy gold nucleus (Z = 79) | c. Assumed stationary due to being ~50 times heavier than the projectile |
| 4. Alpha-particle charge profile | d. Two units of positive charge (+2e) |
�� Strong electric field causes scattering. �� Electrons are too light. �� Alpha particle carries +2e.
1 → a : Strong electric field causes large-angle scattering. 2 → b : Electrons negligibly affect trajectories. 3 → c : Gold nucleus is treated as stationary. 4 → d : Alpha particle has charge +2e. Therefore, option A is correct.
- �� Option B → Multiple mismatches.
- �� Option C → Incorrect associations.
- �� Option D → Incorrect charge and mass assignments.
Used
- Option Grouping
Application:
- Match each physical quantity with its role.
Final Logic:
- Only option A provides all correct matches.
Field–Electron–Nucleus–Alpha
18 Statements fundamentally explaining why atomic electrons are neglected in the formal trajectory computation:
1. They possess an insignificantly small mass compared to the highly massive alpha particles.
2. They lack the momentum required to appreciably deflect the incoming projectile's path.
3. The dominant scattering force is overwhelmingly provided by the massive, concentrated positive nucleus.
4. Their negative charge perfectly neutralises the nuclear charge precisely at the minimum impact parameter.
�� Electrons are very light. �� Their effect is negligible. �� Nucleus dominates scattering.
Statements 1, 2 and 3 correctly explain why electrons are ignored in Rutherford's trajectory calculations. Statement 4 is incorrect because nuclear charge is not perfectly neutralized at minimum impact parameter. Therefore, statements 1, 2 and 3 are correct.
- �� Option B → Includes statement 4, which is incorrect.
- �� Option C → Includes statement 4, which is incorrect.
- �� Option D → Includes statement 4, which is incorrect.
Used
- Elimination
Application:
- Identify the dominant contributor to scattering.
Final Logic:
- Nucleus dominates; electrons are negligible.
Light Electrons, Heavy Nucleus
19 In establishing the strict mathematical computation of an alpha-particle's trajectory,
�� Impact parameter determines scattering. �� It is measured perpendicular to motion. �� Larger b gives smaller deflection.
The impact parameter b is defined as the perpendicular distance between the initial velocity direction of the alpha particle and the centre of the target nucleus. Therefore, option B is correct.
- �� Option A → Rutherford's analysis is based on Coulomb force, not electron-generated magnetic fields.
- �� Option C → Head-on collision corresponds to minimum impact parameter.
- �� Option D → Different particles have different impact parameters.
Used
- Definition Recall
Application:
- Use the standard definition of impact parameter.
Final Logic:
- Impact parameter is the perpendicular offset from the nuclear centre.
b = Side Offset
20 In evaluating the closest approach distance during a theoretical head-on collision,
�� Energy conservation is used. �� Velocity becomes zero momentarily. �� KE converts into PE.
At the distance of closest approach, the alpha particle momentarily comes to rest. Therefore, all its initial kinetic energy is converted into electrostatic potential energy. Hence, option A is correct.
- �� Option B → Alpha particles do not penetrate the nucleus in this analysis.
- �� Option C → Potential energy is maximum, not zero.
- �� Option D → Closest approach is determined by energy conservation, not physical contact.
Used
- Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application:
- Apply conservation of energy during head-on scattering.
Final Logic:
- At closest approach, KE = PE.
Closest Approach → KE = PE
