CUET UG Physics Booster Test 2-Alpha-Particle Scattering
📌 Answers are locked once submitted — results and explanations appear at the end.
QUESTION 1 OF 20
Statements about the proposed strategy of the classic scattering experiment:
1. Ernst Rutherford originally proposed the scattering of alpha particles by atoms in 1906.
2. It aimed to investigate how positive charge and electrons are arranged inside the atom.
3. It leveraged alpha-particles emitted by radioactive elements as a probing tool.
4. The experiment was physically performed from start to finish solely by J.J. Thomson.
QUESTION 2 OF 20
Rutherford primarily acted as the ________ of the experiment, while Geiger and Marsden were the ones who ultimately ________ it.
QUESTION 3 OF 20
In the experimental setup designed by Geiger and Marsden,
QUESTION 4 OF 20
Match List I with List II regarding the experimental components of the setup.
| List I | List II |
|---|---|
| 1. Radioactive source | a. 214/83 Bi emitting 5.5 MeV particles |
| 2. Lead bricks | b. Material used to collimate alpha-particles |
| 3. Narrow beam | c. Directed onto the gold foil |
| 4. Metal foil target | d. Has a thickness of 2.1 × 10⁻⁷ m |
QUESTION 5 OF 20
If an alpha particle of natural origin has a maximum kinetic energy of 7.7 MeV, this exact energy converted into Joules (given e = 1.6 × 10⁻¹⁹ C) mathematically equals
QUESTION 6 OF 20
Incorrect statement about the gold foil used in the experiment:
QUESTION 7 OF 20
Correct statements regarding the detector apparatus:
1. It consists of a zinc sulphide screen coupled with a microscope.
2. It can be rotated to study the particle distribution as a function of scattering angle.
3. Flashes on the screen are produced when alpha-particles strike it.
4. It measures the exact mass of individual alpha particles on impact.
QUESTION 8 OF 20
During the continuous detection process in the experiment,
QUESTION 9 OF 20
Approximately what percentage of the incident alpha-particles in the experiment scatter by an angle greater than 1°?
QUESTION 10 OF 20
The theoretical prediction curve plotted against the data points for particle distribution
Choose correct:
QUESTION 11 OF 20
Match List I with List II for the observed scattering probabilities and mechanisms.
| List I | List II |
|---|---|
| 1. Deflection > 1° | a. Accounts for roughly 0.14% of particles |
| 2. Deflection > 90° | b. Accounts for about 1 in 8000 particles |
| 3. Pass straight through foil | c. Happens to the vast majority of incident particles |
| 4. Rebounds backward | d. Occurs when the impact parameter is minimum |
QUESTION 12 OF 20
What specific fraction of incident alpha-particles experience a drastic deflection of more than 90°?
QUESTION 13 OF 20
Incorrect statement regarding Rutherford's central concentration hypothesis:
QUESTION 14 OF 20
Statements regarding the electrostatic repulsive force on an alpha-particle:
1. It is governed purely by Coulomb's law for electrostatic force.
2. It is directed strictly along the line joining the alpha-particle and the target nucleus.
3. Its magnitude continuously changes as the particle approaches and recedes from the nucleus.
4. It functions as an attractive gravitational force.
QUESTION 15 OF 20
The experimentally derived upper limit to the size of the nucleus was determined to be ________, which is drastically smaller than the established atom size from ________ theory.
QUESTION 16 OF 20
If the calculated radius of an atom is represented as Rₐ and the size of the nucleus as Rₙ, the proportion Rₐ / Rₙ based on Rutherford's deductions is expressed algebraically as:
QUESTION 17 OF 20
The intense electric field originating from the central nucleus
Choose correct:
QUESTION 18 OF 20
Match the participant particle to its role/characteristic in the scattering dynamics.
| List I | List II |
|---|---|
| 1. Alpha-particle | a. Carries a positive charge of +2e |
| 2. Gold nucleus | b. Modeled as remaining stationary due to heavy mass |
| 3. Atomic electrons | c. So light they do not appreciably affect scattering paths |
| 4. Incident beam | d. Composed of particles with 5.5 MeV kinetic energy |
QUESTION 19 OF 20
Correct statements concerning the computation of an alpha-particle's trajectory:
1. The computation leverages Newton's second law of motion.
2. It incorporates Coulomb's law for calculating the electrostatic force.
3. It practically assumes the much heavier gold nucleus remains stationary.
4. It requires solving for the exact real-time position of all atomic electrons simultaneously.
QUESTION 20 OF 20
Statements framing Coulomb repulsion in Rutherford's model:
1. The electrostatic force is inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them.
2. The alpha-particle acts as a moving point charge of +2e.
3. The target gold nucleus acts as a stationary point charge of +Ze.
4. The severe repulsion causes the gold nucleus to violently recoil out of the foil.
Test Complete!
Answer Review
1 Statements about the proposed strategy of the classic scattering experiment:
1. Ernst Rutherford originally proposed the scattering of alpha particles by atoms in 1906.
2. It aimed to investigate how positive charge and electrons are arranged inside the atom.
3. It leveraged alpha-particles emitted by radioactive elements as a probing tool.
4. The experiment was physically performed from start to finish solely by J.J. Thomson.
�� Rutherford proposed the experiment. �� Atomic structure was the target of investigation. �� Alpha particles acted as probes.
Statement 1 is correct because Rutherford proposed alpha-particle scattering in 1906. Statement 2 is correct because the objective was to determine the arrangement of positive charge and electrons. Statement 3 is correct because naturally emitted alpha particles from radioactive substances were used as probes. Statement 4 is incorrect because the experiment was performed by Geiger and Marsden under Rutherford's guidance. Therefore, statements 1, 2 and 3 are correct.
- �� Option B → Includes statement 4, which is incorrect.
- �� Option C → Includes statement 4, which is incorrect.
- �� Option D → Includes statement 4, which is incorrect.
Used
- Elimination
Application:
- Check each statement against the historical facts of the Rutherford experiment.
Final Logic:
- Only statements 1, 2 and 3 are correct.
Rutherford Proposed, Geiger Performed
2 Rutherford primarily acted as the ________ of the experiment, while Geiger and Marsden were the ones who ultimately ________ it.
�� Rutherford designed the strategy. �� Geiger and Marsden carried it out. �� Experimental work validated the idea.
Rutherford conceived and proposed the alpha-particle scattering experiment. The actual experimental work was conducted by Hans Geiger and Ernest Marsden. Therefore, the correct combination is Proposer, Performed.
- �� Option B → Rutherford supported and proposed the experiment.
- �� Option C → Rutherford was not a student in this context.
- �� Option D → Geiger and Marsden performed experiments rather than merely theorizing.
Used
- Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application:
- Associate scientists with their roles.
Final Logic:
- Rutherford proposed; Geiger and Marsden performed.
Think → Rutherford, Do → Geiger-Marsden
3 In the experimental setup designed by Geiger and Marsden,
�� Vacuum minimizes unwanted collisions. �� Entire setup is enclosed. �� Alpha particles travel freely.
The entire scattering apparatus was placed inside a vacuum chamber to prevent alpha particles from interacting with air molecules before reaching the foil and detector. Therefore, option A is correct.
- �� Option B → Incorrect because the entire setup was housed inside the vacuum chamber.
- �� Option C → Incorrect because dense gas would interfere with alpha particles.
- �� Option D → Incorrect because no water-filled lead chamber was used.
Used
- Elimination
Application:
- Identify the purpose and use of the vacuum chamber.
Final Logic:
- Vacuum ensures unobstructed alpha-particle motion.
Vacuum = Clear Path
4 Match List I with List II regarding the experimental components of the setup.
| List I | List II |
|---|---|
| 1. Radioactive source | a. 214/83 Bi emitting 5.5 MeV particles |
| 2. Lead bricks | b. Material used to collimate alpha-particles |
| 3. Narrow beam | c. Directed onto the gold foil |
| 4. Metal foil target | d. Has a thickness of 2.1 × 10⁻⁷ m |
�� Bi source emits alpha particles. �� Lead bricks collimate the beam. �� Gold foil acts as target.
1 → a : Radioactive bismuth source emits alpha particles. 2 → b : Lead bricks are used for collimation. 3 → c : The narrow beam is directed toward the gold foil. 4 → d : Gold foil thickness is approximately 2.1 × 10⁻⁷ m. Thus, option A is correct.
- �� Option B → Source and lead bricks are mismatched.
- �� Option C → Multiple incorrect pairings.
- �� Option D → Incorrect assignment of foil and source.
Used
- Option Grouping
Application:
- Match each experimental component with its function.
Final Logic:
- Only option A correctly matches all components.
Source-Lead-Beam-Foil
5 If an alpha particle of natural origin has a maximum kinetic energy of 7.7 MeV, this exact energy converted into Joules (given e = 1.6 × 10⁻¹⁹ C) mathematically equals
�� 1 eV = 1.6 × 10⁻¹⁹ J. �� 7.7 MeV = 7.7 × 10⁶ eV. �� Convert by multiplication.
Energy in joules: E = 7.7 × 10⁶ × 1.6 × 10⁻¹⁹ = 12.32 × 10⁻¹³ = 1.23 × 10⁻¹² J ≈ 1.2 × 10⁻¹² J Therefore, option A is correct.
- �� Option B → Represents only 1 eV.
- �� Option C → One order of magnitude smaller.
- �� Option D → Numerical conversion is incorrect.
Used
- Substitution
Application:
- Convert MeV to joules using 1 eV = 1.6 × 10⁻¹⁹ J.
Final Logic:
- 7.7 MeV ≈ 1.2 × 10⁻¹² J.
MeV × 10⁻¹³ ≈ Joules
6 Incorrect statement about the gold foil used in the experiment:
�� Gold foil thickness is 2.1 × 10⁻⁷ m. �� Gold has Z = 79. �� Thin foil minimizes multiple scattering.
The thickness of the gold foil used in the experiment is approximately 2.1 × 10⁻⁷ m, not 2.1 × 10⁻¹⁰ m. Therefore, option C is correct.
- �� Option A → Correct atomic number of gold.
- �� Option B → Correct reason for using a thin foil.
- �� Option D → Correct approximation regarding nuclear mass.
Used
- Dimensional/Unit Analysis
Application:
- Compare the actual foil thickness with the given value.
Final Logic:
- 2.1 × 10⁻¹⁰ m is much smaller than the actual foil thickness.
Gold Foil = 10⁻⁷ m
7 Correct statements regarding the detector apparatus:
1. It consists of a zinc sulphide screen coupled with a microscope.
2. It can be rotated to study the particle distribution as a function of scattering angle.
3. Flashes on the screen are produced when alpha-particles strike it.
4. It measures the exact mass of individual alpha particles on impact.
�� ZnS screen detects particles. �� Microscope observes flashes. �� Detector rotates to measure angles.
Statements 1, 2 and 3 are correct descriptions of the detector system used in the Geiger-Marsden experiment. Statement 4 is incorrect because the detector counted scintillations and did not measure particle mass directly. Therefore, option A is correct.
- �� Option B → Includes statement 4, which is incorrect.
- �� Option C → Includes statement 4, which is incorrect.
- �� Option D → Includes statement 4, which is incorrect.
Used
- Elimination
Application:
- Verify the functions of the detector apparatus.
Final Logic:
- Only statements 1, 2 and 3 are correct.
ZnS + Microscope = Detector
8 During the continuous detection process in the experiment,
�� Alpha particles strike ZnS. �� Tiny flashes appear. �� Microscope is used for observation.
Scattered alpha particles striking the zinc sulphide screen produce small flashes of light known as scintillations. These flashes are observed through a microscope. Therefore, option B is correct.
- �� Option A → Incorrect because flashes are discrete, not continuous.
- �� Option C → Incorrect because scintillations occur whenever particles strike the screen.
- �� Option D → Incorrect because flashes originate in the ZnS screen.
Used
- Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application:
- Relate scintillations to detector operation.
Final Logic:
- ZnS screen produces visible flashes.
Alpha + ZnS = Scintillation
9 Approximately what percentage of the incident alpha-particles in the experiment scatter by an angle greater than 1°?
�� Most particles pass straight through. �� Only a small fraction scatter noticeably. �� Large-angle scattering is very rare.
Experimental observations showed that only about 0.14% of the incident alpha particles were scattered by angles greater than 1°. Therefore, option D is correct.
- �� Option A → Far larger than experimental observations.
- �� Option B → Ten times larger than the observed value.
- �� Option C → Ten times smaller than the observed value.
Used
- Recall-Based Elimination
Application:
- Recall the quantitative results of Rutherford scattering.
Final Logic:
- Observed value ≈ 0.14%.
More than 1° → 0.14%
10 The theoretical prediction curve plotted against the data points for particle distribution
Choose correct:
�� Rutherford theory assumes a nucleus. �� Particles are not absorbed. �� Thomson's model fails.
Statement A is correct because Rutherford's theoretical distribution assumes a small, dense, positively charged nucleus. Statements B, C and D are incorrect because the theory neither assumes absorption nor uniform charge distribution and does not support Thomson's model. Therefore, only statement A is correct.
- �� Option B → Particle absorption is not assumed.
- �� Option C → Rutherford rejected uniform charge distribution.
- �� Option D → Thomson's model could not explain the observed data.
Used
- Elimination
Application:
- Compare Rutherford's assumptions with alternative models.
Final Logic:
- Only statement A matches Rutherford's theory.
Curve = Nucleus Model
11 Match List I with List II for the observed scattering probabilities and mechanisms.
| List I | List II |
|---|---|
| 1. Deflection > 1° | a. Accounts for roughly 0.14% of particles |
| 2. Deflection > 90° | b. Accounts for about 1 in 8000 particles |
| 3. Pass straight through foil | c. Happens to the vast majority of incident particles |
| 4. Rebounds backward | d. Occurs when the impact parameter is minimum |
�� Most particles pass straight through. �� Large-angle scattering is rare. �� Backscattering occurs in head-on encounters.
1 → a : About 0.14% of alpha particles scatter by more than 1°. 2 → b : Approximately 1 in 8000 particles scatter by more than 90°. 3 → c : Most alpha particles pass through the foil undeflected. 4 → d : Backward scattering occurs when the impact parameter is minimum. Therefore, option A is correct.
- �� Option B → Incorrect matching of scattering probabilities.
- �� Option C → Multiple mismatches.
- �� Option D → Incorrect association of rebound and straight-through events.
Used
- Option Grouping
Application:
- Match each scattering event with its experimentally observed frequency.
Final Logic:
- Only option A correctly matches all observations.
0.14%, 1/8000, Straight, Rebound
12 What specific fraction of incident alpha-particles experience a drastic deflection of more than 90°?
�� Large-angle scattering is extremely rare. �� Most particles miss the nucleus. �� Only a few approach very closely.
Experimental observations showed that only about one alpha particle in every 8000 incident particles was scattered through an angle greater than 90°. This rare event provided strong evidence for a compact nucleus. Therefore, option C is correct.
- �� Option A → Much smaller than the observed frequency.
- �� Option B → Much larger than the observed frequency.
- �� Option D → Ten times larger than the experimental value.
Used
- Recall-Based Elimination
Application:
- Recall the quantitative scattering results.
Final Logic:
- Backward scattering occurs for approximately 1 in 8000 particles.
90°+ → 1 in 8000
13 Incorrect statement regarding Rutherford's central concentration hypothesis:
�� Rutherford proposed the nuclear model. �� Large deflections require concentrated charge. �� Experimental evidence supported the nucleus.
Rutherford's central concentration hypothesis led directly to the nuclear model. The observed scattering data strongly contradicted Thomson's plum pudding model and supported a concentrated positive nucleus. Therefore, option D is correct.
- �� Option A → Correct inference regarding mass concentration.
- �� Option B → Correct explanation of large-angle scattering.
- �� Option C → Correct description of closest approach.
Used
- Odd One Out
Application:
- Identify the statement opposite to Rutherford's conclusions.
Final Logic:
- The nuclear hypothesis supported, not disproved, the nuclear model.
Concentrated Charge → Nuclear Model
14 Statements regarding the electrostatic repulsive force on an alpha-particle:
1. It is governed purely by Coulomb's law for electrostatic force.
2. It is directed strictly along the line joining the alpha-particle and the target nucleus.
3. Its magnitude continuously changes as the particle approaches and recedes from the nucleus.
4. It functions as an attractive gravitational force.
�� Coulomb force governs scattering. �� Force acts along the line joining charges. �� Magnitude varies with distance.
Statement 1 is correct because scattering is explained by electrostatic Coulomb repulsion. Statement 2 is correct because Coulomb force acts along the line connecting the charges. Statement 3 is correct because force varies as 1/r². Statement 4 is incorrect because the interaction is electrostatic repulsion, not gravitational attraction. Therefore, statements 1, 2 and 3 are correct.
- �� Option B → Includes statement 4, which is incorrect.
- �� Option C → Includes statement 4, which is incorrect.
- �� Option D → Includes statement 4, which is incorrect.
Used
- Elimination
Application:
- Apply Coulomb's law to each statement.
Final Logic:
- Only statements 1, 2 and 3 correctly describe the force.
Coulomb → Line → Variable
15 The experimentally derived upper limit to the size of the nucleus was determined to be ________, which is drastically smaller than the established atom size from ________ theory.
�� Nucleus is extremely small. �� Atomic size was known from kinetic theory. �� Rutherford estimated nuclear dimensions.
Rutherford's analysis gave an upper limit of approximately 10⁻¹⁴ m for nuclear size. Prior estimates from kinetic theory indicated atomic dimensions of about 10⁻¹⁰ m. Therefore, option A is correct.
- �� Option B → 10⁻¹⁰ m corresponds to atomic size.
- �� Option C → Not the basis of Rutherford's estimate.
- �� Option D → Completely incorrect scale and theory.
Used
- Dimensional/Unit Analysis
Application:
- Compare atomic and nuclear size scales.
Final Logic:
- Nucleus ≈ 10⁻¹⁴ m, atom ≈ 10⁻¹⁰ m.
Atom 10⁻¹⁰, Nucleus 10⁻¹⁴
16 If the calculated radius of an atom is represented as Rₐ and the size of the nucleus as Rₙ, the proportion Rₐ / Rₙ based on Rutherford's deductions is expressed algebraically as:
�� Atom is much larger than nucleus. �� Ratio comes from size comparison. �� Most atomic volume is empty.
Atomic radius is approximately 10⁻¹⁰ m, while nuclear radius lies around 10⁻¹⁴–10⁻¹⁵ m. Thus, Rₐ/Rₙ ≈ 10⁴ to 10⁵ Therefore, option B is correct.
- �� Option A → Too small.
- �� Option C → Too large.
- �� Option D → Far below the observed ratio.
Used
- Dimensional/Unit Analysis
Application:
- Compare typical atomic and nuclear dimensions.
Final Logic:
- Atom is 10,000–100,000 times larger than nucleus.
Atom/Nucleus = 10⁴–10⁵
17 The intense electric field originating from the central nucleus
Choose correct:
�� Nucleus creates a strong electric field. �� Alpha particles are repelled. �� Scattering results from this repulsion.
The strong electric field near the positively charged nucleus produces the electrostatic repulsion responsible for large-angle scattering of alpha particles. Statements B, C and D are incorrect. Therefore, only statement C is correct.
- �� Option A → Scattering is due to electric, not magnetic, effects.
- �� Option B → Electrons do not completely neutralize the nuclear field.
- �� Option D → Alpha particles do not orbit the nucleus.
Used
- Elimination
Application:
- Identify the physical cause of scattering.
Final Logic:
- Only nuclear electric repulsion explains the observation.
Strong Field → Strong Scatter
18 Match the participant particle to its role/characteristic in the scattering dynamics.
| List I | List II |
|---|---|
| 1. Alpha-particle | a. Carries a positive charge of +2e |
| 2. Gold nucleus | b. Modeled as remaining stationary due to heavy mass |
| 3. Atomic electrons | c. So light they do not appreciably affect scattering paths |
| 4. Incident beam | d. Composed of particles with 5.5 MeV kinetic energy |
�� Alpha particles carry +2e. �� Gold nucleus is very heavy. �� Electrons have negligible effect.
1 → a : Alpha particle has charge +2e. 2 → b : Gold nucleus is treated as stationary. 3 → c : Electrons are too light to significantly influence scattering. 4 → d : Incident beam consists of 5.5 MeV alpha particles. Therefore, option A is correct.
- �� Option B → Incorrect assignments.
- �� Option C → Multiple mismatches.
- �� Option D → Incorrect charge and mass associations.
Used
- Option Grouping
Application:
- Match each particle with its known property.
Final Logic:
- Only option A correctly matches all entries.
+2e, Heavy, Light, 5.5 MeV
19 Correct statements concerning the computation of an alpha-particle's trajectory:
1. The computation leverages Newton's second law of motion.
2. It incorporates Coulomb's law for calculating the electrostatic force.
3. It practically assumes the much heavier gold nucleus remains stationary.
4. It requires solving for the exact real-time position of all atomic electrons simultaneously.
�� Newton's law determines motion. �� Coulomb force provides interaction. �� Heavy nucleus is treated as fixed.
Statement 1 is correct because trajectory calculation uses Newton's second law. Statement 2 is correct because the force is obtained from Coulomb's law. Statement 3 is correct because the gold nucleus is much heavier than the alpha particle. Statement 4 is incorrect because electron positions are not required for Rutherford's scattering analysis. Therefore, statements 1, 2 and 3 are correct.
- �� Option B → Includes statement 4, which is incorrect.
- �� Option C → Includes statement 4, which is incorrect.
- �� Option D → Includes statement 4, which is incorrect.
Used
- Elimination
Application:
- Identify the assumptions used in Rutherford's theoretical treatment.
Final Logic:
- Only statements 1, 2 and 3 are required.
Newton + Coulomb + Fixed Nucleus
20 Statements framing Coulomb repulsion in Rutherford's model:
1. The electrostatic force is inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them.
2. The alpha-particle acts as a moving point charge of +2e.
3. The target gold nucleus acts as a stationary point charge of +Ze.
4. The severe repulsion causes the gold nucleus to violently recoil out of the foil.
�� Coulomb force follows inverse-square law. �� Alpha particle has charge +2e. �� Nucleus is treated as stationary.
Statement 1 is correct because Coulomb force varies as 1/r². Statement 2 is correct because an alpha particle carries charge +2e. Statement 3 is correct because the gold nucleus is modeled as a stationary charge +Ze. Statement 4 is incorrect because the massive gold nucleus does not violently recoil out of the foil. Therefore, statements 1, 2 and 3 are correct.
- �� Option A → Includes statement 4, which is incorrect.
- �� Option C → Includes statement 4, which is incorrect.
- �� Option D → Includes statement 4, which is incorrect.
Used
- Elimination
Application:
- Apply Coulomb's law and Rutherford's assumptions.
Final Logic:
- Only statements 1, 2 and 3 accurately describe the model.
1/r², +2e, +Ze
