CUET UG Physics Booster Test 2- Historical Discoveries and Electron Properties
📌 Answers are locked once submitted — results and explanations appear at the end.
QUESTION 1 OF 20
Maxwell's equations and Hertz's discoveries
QUESTION 2 OF 20
Match List I with List II (Hertz's framework)
| List I | List II (Correct Match) |
|---|---|
| (1) Electromagnetic waves | (a) Year Hertz performed defining experiments |
| (2) 1887 | (b) Generated and detected by Hertz |
| (3) Wave nature | (c) Theory foundational to Hertz's work |
| (4) Maxwell's equations | (d) Strongly established by late 19th century |
QUESTION 3 OF 20
Low pressure conduction statements
1. Discharge occurs at about 0.001 mm Hg.
2. An electric field must be applied to the gas.
3. It happens without electrodes.
4. A fluorescent glow appears on the glass.
QUESTION 4 OF 20
Incorrect statement about cathode fluorescence
QUESTION 5 OF 20
The entity discovered in 1895, and its discoverer:
QUESTION 6 OF 20
When assessing the history of atomic physics, the discoveries of X-rays and electrons
QUESTION 7 OF 20
Correct statements about William Crookes' hypothesis
1. He discovered cathode rays in 1870.
2. He suggested they were streams of positively charged particles.
3. He proposed in 1879 that they were fast moving negative particles.
4. His hypothesis was later confirmed by J.J. Thomson.
QUESTION 8 OF 20
If an electron has a charge of -x(e) and another identical electron in the stream has a charge of -y(e), the total charge of these two specific particles will be
QUESTION 9 OF 20
If a particle identical to an electron has a mass 2 times larger but the same charge, its specific charge relative to 1.76 × 10¹¹ C kg⁻¹ would be:
QUESTION 10 OF 20
J.J. Thomson's 1906 Nobel Prize recognition
QUESTION 11 OF 20
During the determination of specific charge, the value obtained
QUESTION 12 OF 20
Statements about electron universality
1. Particles emitted by UV light irradiation have identical e/m.
2. Heated metals emit particles with the same e/m.
3. The specific charge alters dynamically based on the source.
4. Thomson suggested these identical particles are fundamental constituents of matter.
QUESTION 13 OF 20
The speed range of cathode rays compared to light, and the fields used to measure it:
QUESTION 14 OF 20
Correct statements about the accepted e/m value
1. The presently accepted value is 1.76 × 10¹¹ C/kg.
2. It proved electrons carry positive charge.
3. It confirmed particles from varied emission sources are identical.
4. It depends on the target gas used.
QUESTION 15 OF 20
If an oil drop holds a total measured charge of 4.806 × 10⁻¹⁹ C, and the elementary charge is 1.602 × 10⁻¹⁹ C, how many elementary charges are present?
QUESTION 16 OF 20
Incorrect statement about charge quantization
QUESTION 17 OF 20
Match List I with List II (Metal properties)
| List I | List II (Correct Match) |
|---|---|
| (1) Free electrons | (a) Responsible for carrying current |
| (2) Inside metal | (b) Held inside by attractive forces |
| (3) Positive ions | (c) Exert attractive forces to pull electrons back |
| (4) Conductivity | (d) Free to move but generally unable to escape |
QUESTION 18 OF 20
The attractive forces in a metal
QUESTION 19 OF 20
When a free electron attempts to leave the metal surface without sufficient energy
QUESTION 20 OF 20
Correct statements about escape energy requirements
1. A certain minimum amount of energy is required to escape.
2. This threshold energy is known as the work function.
3. It is typically denoted by φ₀ and measured in electron volts (eV).
4. It proves that electrons have zero mass.
Test Complete!
Answer Review
1 Maxwell's equations and Hertz's discoveries
�� Maxwell predicted electromagnetic waves. �� Hertz experimentally verified their existence. �� Together they established the wave nature of light.
Maxwell's equations predicted the existence of electromagnetic waves and showed that light itself is an electromagnetic wave. Hertz later generated and detected electromagnetic waves experimentally in 1887. These discoveries strongly established the wave nature of light. Therefore, Option C is correct.
- �� Option A → Maxwell's theory did not prove the need for a material medium for light.
- �� Option B → Maxwell's and Hertz's work supported, not contradicted, the wave nature of light.
- �� Option D → Measurement of specific charge (e/m) was done by J.J. Thomson.
Used
- Elimination
Application:
- Remove options unrelated to Maxwell's theory and Hertz's experiments.
Final Logic:
- Only Option C correctly describes the significance of their discoveries.
Maxwell Predicts → Hertz Proves
2 Match List I with List II (Hertz's framework)
| List I | List II (Correct Match) |
|---|---|
| (1) Electromagnetic waves | (a) Year Hertz performed defining experiments |
| (2) 1887 | (b) Generated and detected by Hertz |
| (3) Wave nature | (c) Theory foundational to Hertz's work |
| (4) Maxwell's equations | (d) Strongly established by late 19th century |
�� Hertz generated and detected electromagnetic waves. �� The experiments were performed in 1887. �� Maxwell's equations formed the theoretical foundation.
The correct matching is: → (1) Electromagnetic waves → (b) Generated and detected by Hertz → (2) 1887 → (a) Year Hertz performed defining experiments → (3) Wave nature → (d) Strongly established by late 19th century → (4) Maxwell's equations → (c) Theory foundational to Hertz's work Hertz's experiments verified Maxwell's predictions and strongly established the wave nature of light.
- �� Option B → Incorrect matching of (1), (2), and (3).
- �� Option C → Incorrectly associates 1887 and electromagnetic waves.
- �� Option D → Incorrectly matches Maxwell's equations and wave nature.
Used
- Option Grouping
Application:
- Match each term with its correct scientific significance.
Final Logic:
- Only Option A gives all correct pairings.
Waves → Hertz → 1887 → Maxwell
3 Low pressure conduction statements
1. Discharge occurs at about 0.001 mm Hg.
2. An electric field must be applied to the gas.
3. It happens without electrodes.
4. A fluorescent glow appears on the glass.
�� Gas discharge requires very low pressure. �� An electric field is necessary. �� Fluorescence is observed on the glass wall.
- Statement 1 is correct because discharge occurs at approximately 0.001 mm Hg. → Statement 2 is correct because an electric field must be applied across the electrodes. → Statement 3 is incorrect because electrodes are required in the discharge tube. → Statement 4 is correct because a fluorescent glow appears on the glass opposite the cathode. → Therefore Option B is correct.
- �� Option A → Includes incorrect statement 3.
- �� Option C → Includes incorrect statement 3.
- �� Option D → Includes incorrect statement 3.
Used
- Option Grouping
Application:
- Check each numbered statement against discharge tube observations.
Final Logic:
- Only statements 1, 2 and 4 are correct.
Low Pressure + Electric Field + Glow
4 Incorrect statement about cathode fluorescence
�� Cathode rays strike the glass. �� Fluorescence depends on glass type. �� Soda glass produces yellowish-green fluorescence.
Cathode fluorescence is produced when cathode rays strike the glass wall opposite the cathode. The colour depends on the nature of the glass and appears yellowish-green in soda glass. It is not produced by positive radiation from the anode. Therefore, Option D is the incorrect statement.
- �� Option A → Correct observation of cathode ray experiments.
- �� Option B → Correct because fluorescence colour depends on glass composition.
- �� Option C → Correct for soda glass.
Used
- Elimination
Application:
- Identify the statement inconsistent with cathode ray observations.
Final Logic:
- Fluorescence is produced by cathode rays, not positive radiation.
Cathode Rays → Green Glow
5 The entity discovered in 1895, and its discoverer:
�� Roentgen discovered X-rays in 1895. �� This was a landmark discovery. �� It contributed significantly to atomic physics.
Wilhelm Roentgen discovered X-rays in 1895 while studying cathode ray tubes. This discovery became one of the most important milestones in the development of atomic structure. Therefore, Option B is correct.
- �� Option A → Cathode rays were known before 1895.
- �� Option C → Electron discovery is associated with Thomson in 1897.
- �� Option D → Millikan measured electronic charge, not specific charge.
Used
- Direct Recall
Application:
- Recall the scientist and year associated with X-rays.
Final Logic:
- 1895 corresponds to X-rays discovered by Roentgen.
1895 = Roentgen = X-rays
6 When assessing the history of atomic physics, the discoveries of X-rays and electrons
�� X-rays and electrons transformed atomic theory. �� They revealed subatomic structure. �� Both discoveries were experimentally based.
The discoveries of X-rays and electrons demonstrated that atoms possessed internal structure and were not indivisible particles. These discoveries became major milestones in the understanding of atomic structure and initiated modern atomic physics. Therefore, Option B is correct.
- �� Option A → Charge is quantised, not a continuous fluid.
- �� Option B → These discoveries did not arise from high-pressure gas observations.
- �� Option D → Both discoveries relied heavily on experiments.
Used
- Elimination
Application:
- Reject options that contradict historical facts.
Final Logic:
- The discoveries were key milestones in understanding atomic structure.
X-rays + Electrons = Modern Atom
7 Correct statements about William Crookes' hypothesis
1. He discovered cathode rays in 1870.
2. He suggested they were streams of positively charged particles.
3. He proposed in 1879 that they were fast moving negative particles.
4. His hypothesis was later confirmed by J.J. Thomson.
�� Cathode rays were discovered before Thomson's work. �� Crookes proposed they were negatively charged particles. �� Thomson later confirmed this idea.
- Statement 1 is correct because cathode rays were discovered around 1870. → Statement 2 is incorrect because Crookes proposed that cathode rays were negatively charged particles, not positively charged particles. → Statement 3 is correct because Crookes suggested in 1879 that cathode rays were streams of fast moving negative particles. → Statement 4 is correct because Thomson later confirmed the nature of cathode rays through his experiments. → Therefore Option A is correct.
- �� Option B → Includes incorrect statement 2.
- �� Option C → Includes incorrect statement 2.
- �� Option D → Includes incorrect statement 2.
Used
- Option Grouping
Application:
- Evaluate each numbered statement separately.
Final Logic:
- Only statements 1, 3 and 4 are correct.
Crookes → Negative Particles → Thomson Confirms
8 If an electron has a charge of -x(e) and another identical electron in the stream has a charge of -y(e), the total charge of these two specific particles will be
�� Charges add algebraically. �� Both charges are negative. �� Total charge remains negative.
Total charge = -x(e) + -y(e) = -(x + y)e Therefore, Option A is correct.
- �� Option B → Incorrect sign.
- �� Option A → Charges are added, not subtracted.
- �� Option D → Incorrect algebraic expression.
Used
- Substitution
Application:
- Add the charges directly.
Final Logic:
- Sum of two negative charges is -(x + y)e.
Negative + Negative = More Negative
9 If a particle identical to an electron has a mass 2 times larger but the same charge, its specific charge relative to 1.76 × 10¹¹ C kg⁻¹ would be:
�� Specific charge = e/m. �� Mass doubles while charge remains constant. �� Therefore e/m becomes half.
Given: e/m = 1.76 × 10¹¹ C kg⁻¹ If mass becomes 2m and charge remains e, New specific charge = e/2m = (1/2)(1.76 × 10¹¹) = 0.88 × 10¹¹ C kg⁻¹ Therefore, Option B is correct.
- �� Option A → Represents double the specific charge.
- �� Option C → Represents the original value.
- �� Option D → Represents elementary charge, not specific charge.
Used
- Substitution
Application:
- Apply e/m directly.
Final Logic:
- Doubling mass halves the specific charge.
Double Mass → Half e/m
10 J.J. Thomson's 1906 Nobel Prize recognition
�� Thomson received the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1906. �� The award recognized work on gas conduction. �� It was unrelated to Millikan's experiment.
J.J. Thomson received the 1906 Nobel Prize in Physics for his theoretical and experimental investigations on the conduction of electricity by gases. These investigations led to important discoveries regarding electrons and atomic structure. Therefore, Option B is correct.
- �� Option A → Electromagnetic waves were experimentally demonstrated by Hertz.
- �� Option C → Oil-drop experiment was performed by Millikan.
- �� Option D → Work function was not the basis of the Nobel Prize.
Used
- Direct Recall
Application:
- Recall the official reason for Thomson's Nobel Prize.
Final Logic:
- The Nobel Prize recognized his investigations on electricity conduction by gases.
Thomson Nobel = Gas Conduction
11 During the determination of specific charge, the value obtained
�� Thomson found the same e/m value under different conditions. �� The cathode material did not affect the result. �� This supported the universality of electrons.
J.J. Thomson observed that the value of e/m remained the same irrespective of the cathode material used in the discharge tube. This indicated that cathode ray particles were identical and universal in nature. The result was one of the strongest pieces of evidence for the existence of electrons as fundamental constituents of matter. Therefore, Option B is correct.
- �� Option A → The value of e/m was found to be independent of the gas used.
- �� Option C → Cathode rays are not uniquely associated with soda glass.
- �� Option D → Mutually perpendicular fields are used in measurement, but they do not cause radical changes in e/m.
Used
- Elimination
Application:
- Remove statements that contradict Thomson's observations.
Final Logic:
- The measured e/m value was independent of cathode material.
Same Cathode or Different Cathode → Same e/m
12 Statements about electron universality
1. Particles emitted by UV light irradiation have identical e/m.
2. Heated metals emit particles with the same e/m.
3. The specific charge alters dynamically based on the source.
4. Thomson suggested these identical particles are fundamental constituents of matter.
�� Electrons from different sources have identical e/m. �� Thomson proposed electrons are universal. �� e/m does not depend on the source.
- Statement 1 is correct because particles emitted through UV light irradiation possess the same e/m as electrons. → Statement 2 is correct because electrons emitted from heated metals also have the same e/m value. → Statement 3 is incorrect because the specific charge does not change based on the source. → Statement 4 is correct because Thomson suggested that these identical particles are fundamental constituents of matter. → Therefore Option B is correct.
- �� Option A → Includes incorrect statement 3.
- �� Option B → Includes incorrect statement 3.
- �� Option C → Includes incorrect statement 3.
Used
- Option Grouping
Application:
- Check each numbered statement using the concept of electron universality.
Final Logic:
- Only statements 1, 2 and 4 are correct.
Different Sources → Same Electron
13 The speed range of cathode rays compared to light, and the fields used to measure it:
�� Cathode rays move at high speeds. �� Their speeds are lower than the speed of light. �� Electric and magnetic fields were used in Thomson's experiment.
Cathode ray particles travel with speeds approximately between 0.1c and 0.2c. J.J. Thomson used mutually perpendicular electric and magnetic fields to determine the specific charge and velocity of these particles. These measurements helped establish the properties of electrons. Therefore, Option A is correct.
- �� Option B → Incorrect speed range and incorrect field description.
- �� Option C → Both electric and magnetic fields were used.
- �� Option D → Electrons do not travel at the speed of light.
Used
- Direct Recall
Application:
- Recall the speed range and experimental arrangement used by Thomson.
Final Logic:
- Cathode rays travel at 0.1c to 0.2c and are studied using mutually perpendicular electric and magnetic fields.
0.1c–0.2c + E ⟂ B
14 Correct statements about the accepted e/m value
1. The presently accepted value is 1.76 × 10¹¹ C/kg.
2. It proved electrons carry positive charge.
3. It confirmed particles from varied emission sources are identical.
4. It depends on the target gas used.
�� Accepted e/m value is 1.76 × 10¹¹ C/kg. �� Electrons carry negative charge. �� e/m is independent of emission source.
- Statement 1 is correct because the accepted value of e/m is 1.76 × 10¹¹ C/kg. → Statement 2 is incorrect because electrons carry negative charge, not positive charge. → Statement 3 is correct because identical e/m values from different emission sources established the universality of electrons. → Statement 4 is incorrect because e/m does not depend on the target gas. → Therefore Option A is correct.
- �� Option B → Includes incorrect statement 2.
- �� Option C → Includes incorrect statement 4.
- �� Option D → Includes incorrect statement 4.
Used
- Option Grouping
Application:
- Verify each numbered statement individually.
Final Logic:
- Only statements 1 and 3 are correct.
1.76 × 10¹¹ → Universal Electron
15 If an oil drop holds a total measured charge of 4.806 × 10⁻¹⁹ C, and the elementary charge is 1.602 × 10⁻¹⁹ C, how many elementary charges are present?
�� Charge on a droplet is an integral multiple of e. �� Divide total charge by elementary charge. �� Result gives the number of elementary charges.
Number of elementary charges = (4.806 × 10⁻¹⁹ C)/(1.602 × 10⁻¹⁹ C) = 3 Therefore, the oil drop contains 3 elementary charges. Hence, Option B is correct.
- �� Option A → Gives a smaller value than calculated.
- �� Option C → Greater than the actual value.
- �� Option D → Greater than the actual value.
Used
- Substitution
Application:
- Substitute the given values into q/e.
Final Logic:
- 4.806 ÷ 1.602 = 3.
Charge ÷ e = Number of Electrons
16 Incorrect statement about charge quantization
�� Charge is quantized. �� Millikan established discrete charge values. �� Electron mass can be calculated using e and e/m.
Millikan's oil-drop experiment showed that electric charge exists in discrete packets and is not continuous. The charge on any droplet is always an integral multiple of the elementary charge 1.602 × 10⁻¹⁹ C. Combining e with e/m allows determination of electron mass. Therefore, Option B is the incorrect statement.
- �� Option A → Correct statement regarding quantization of charge.
- �� Option B → Correct value of elementary charge.
- �� Option D → Correct because electron mass can be calculated from e and e/m.
Used
- Elimination
Application:
- Identify the statement that contradicts charge quantization.
Final Logic:
- Millikan proved quantized charge, not continuous charge.
Millikan → Quantized Charge
17 Match List I with List II (Metal properties)
| List I | List II (Correct Match) |
|---|---|
| (1) Free electrons | (a) Responsible for carrying current |
| (2) Inside metal | (b) Held inside by attractive forces |
| (3) Positive ions | (c) Exert attractive forces to pull electrons back |
| (4) Conductivity | (d) Free to move but generally unable to escape |
�� Free electrons move inside metals. �� Positive ions attract electrons. �� Conductivity results from electron motion.
The correct matching is: → (1) Free electrons → (d) Free to move but generally unable to escape → (2) Inside metal → (b) Held inside by attractive forces → (3) Positive ions → (c) Exert attractive forces to pull electrons back → (4) Conductivity → (a) Responsible for carrying current Therefore, Option A is correct.
- �� Option B → Incorrect matching of (1), (3) and (4).
- �� Option C → Multiple pairings are incorrect.
- �� Option D → Multiple pairings are incorrect.
Used
- Option Grouping
Application:
- Match each metal property with its physical meaning.
Final Logic:
- Only Option A gives all correct pairings.
Free → Held → Pull → Current
18 The attractive forces in a metal
�� Positive ions attract electrons. �� Electrons remain bound to the metal. �� Escape requires additional energy.
The attractive forces due to positive ions inside a metal hold free electrons within the metal surface boundary. These forces prevent electrons from escaping freely and are responsible for the existence of the work function. Therefore, Option C is correct.
- �� Option A → Attractive forces do not push electrons outward.
- �� Option B → Metals contain positive ions, not neighbouring negative ions.
- �� Option D → Attractive forces do not vanish during escape attempts.
Used
- Elimination
Application:
- Apply the concept of electron binding in metals.
Final Logic:
- Attractive forces keep electrons confined within the metal.
Positive Ions Hold Electrons
19 When a free electron attempts to leave the metal surface without sufficient energy
�� Electron loss leaves positive charge behind. �� Positive charge attracts the electron. �� The electron is pulled back.
When an electron attempts to leave the metal surface without sufficient energy, the metal becomes positively charged due to loss of negative charge. This positive charge attracts the electron and pulls it back into the metal. Therefore, Option B is correct.
- �� Option A → Secondary photon generation is not the expected outcome.
- �� Option C → The electron cannot escape without sufficient energy.
- �� Option D → Positive ions attract rather than repel electrons.
Used
- Elimination
Application:
- Use electrostatic attraction between opposite charges.
Final Logic:
- Positive surface charge pulls the electron back.
Electron Leaves → Surface Positive
20 Correct statements about escape energy requirements
1. A certain minimum amount of energy is required to escape.
2. This threshold energy is known as the work function.
3. It is typically denoted by φ₀ and measured in electron volts (eV).
4. It proves that electrons have zero mass.
�� Electron escape requires minimum energy. �� This energy is called work function. �� Work function is measured in eV.
- Statement 1 is correct because electrons require a minimum amount of energy to escape from a metal surface. → Statement 2 is correct because this minimum energy is called the work function. → Statement 3 is correct because the work function is commonly denoted by φ₀ and measured in electron volts (eV). → Statement 4 is incorrect because the work function has no relation to electrons having zero mass. → Therefore Option A is correct.
- �� Option B → Includes incorrect statement 4.
- �� Option C → Includes incorrect statement 4.
- �� Option D → Includes incorrect statement 4.
Used
- Option Grouping
Application:
- Check each numbered statement using the definition of work function.
Final Logic:
- Only statements 1, 2 and 3 are correct.
Work Function = Minimum Escape Energy
