CUET UG Applied Mathematics Booster Test 2 - Inverse Matrices and Linear Systems
📌 Answers are locked once submitted — results and explanations appear at the end.
QUESTION 1 OF 20
If A and B are square matrices of order n such that AB = BA = I, which of the following is a mathematically strict implication?
QUESTION 2 OF 20
Match the specific matrix operations to their theoretical properties and outcomes.
| List I | List II |
|---|---|
| 1. Matrix A multiplied by A^-1 | a. (I) |A| * I |
| 2. A^-1 evaluated when |A| = 0 | b. B^-1 * A^-1 |
| 3. The formula evaluating A(adj A) | c. Identity Matrix |
| 4. Property defining (AB)^-1 | d. Strictly does not exist |
QUESTION 3 OF 20
Assuming A, B, and C are appropriately sized invertible square matrices, which of the following expressions apply valid inverse properties?
1) (ABC)^-1 = C^-1 * B^-1 * A^-1
2) (A^T)^-1 = (A^-1)^T
3) (2A)^-1 = 2 * A^-1
4) The inverse of A is completely unique.
QUESTION 4 OF 20
Identify the mathematically INCORRECT statement regarding matrix inversion rules:
QUESTION 5 OF 20
R₁ ↔ R₃ transformation represents which operation?
QUESTION 6 OF 20
What is the consequence if a row becomes zero after row operations on A = IA?
QUESTION 7 OF 20
Starting equation for EMI inverse via row operations is:
QUESTION 8 OF 20
Fundamental goal of C₂ → C₂ − 2C₁ is:
QUESTION 9 OF 20
If |A| = 5, value of |adj A| is:
QUESTION 10 OF 20
Adjoint matrix is formed by:
QUESTION 11 OF 20
If evaluating the coordinate "area" (determinant) of matrix A yields |A| = -10, and adj A is successfully derived, what exact scalar must be multiplied into adj A to yield A^-1?
QUESTION 12 OF 20
Using the Adjugate method to find the integral variables of AX = B, if A^-1 = Row 1: (1, 0), Row 2: (0, 1), and B = Column 1: (5, -2), what is the resulting column vector X?
QUESTION 13 OF 20
To solve a 2-variable linear system rigorously utilizing Cramer's Rule, what mathematically occupies the columns of Delta_y?
QUESTION 14 OF 20
If a Cramer's Rule evaluation for variable z yields Delta_z = 32 and Delta = 8, what is the conclusive value of z?
QUESTION 15 OF 20
P1 MCQ In determining system viability, if Delta = 0, Delta_x = 0, Delta_y = 0, and Delta_z = 0, the overall system of equations is classified mathematically as:
QUESTION 16 OF 20
If Cramer's rule is applied and Delta evaluates precisely to 0 while Delta_y evaluates to -15, what does this mathematically prove regarding system existence conditions?
QUESTION 17 OF 20
When formatting a multi-variable system into an augmented matrix for row reduction, where are the values of the constant equations placed geometrically?
QUESTION 18 OF 20
During the forward elimination stage of row reduction on an augmented matrix, what shape is the coefficient partition of the matrix attempting to achieve?
QUESTION 19 OF 20
Based strictly on the passage, what is the ultimate mathematical authority for determining if a linear system possesses a unique solution?
QUESTION 20 OF 20
If Delta crashes to zero and Delta_x evaluates to 12, what geometric and algebraic phenomenon occurs according to the passage?
Test Complete!
Answer Review
1 If A and B are square matrices of order n such that AB = BA = I, which of the following is a mathematically strict implication?
�� AB = BA = I defines inverse condition �� B acts as inverse of A �� Inverse is unique for square matrices
- By definition, if AB = BA = I, then B is the inverse of A. → This directly implies B = A⁻¹. → Option A and B contradict invertibility, and D is irrelevant since determinants are defined for square matrices.
- �� A → Inverse implies A is non-singular, not singular
- �� B → If inverse exists, |A| ≠ 0
- �� D → Determinant of a square matrix is always defined
Used: Elimination
Application: Use inverse definition to eliminate contradictory statements
Final Logic: Identity product directly defines inverse relationship
"AB = I → B = A⁻¹"
2 Match the specific matrix operations to their theoretical properties and outcomes.
| List I | List II |
|---|---|
| 1. Matrix A multiplied by A^-1 | a. (I) |A| * I |
| 2. A^-1 evaluated when |A| = 0 | b. B^-1 * A^-1 |
| 3. The formula evaluating A(adj A) | c. Identity Matrix |
| 4. Property defining (AB)^-1 | d. Strictly does not exist |
�� Identity and inverse properties used �� Singular matrices have no inverse �� Adjugate identity relation applied
- (1) A·A⁻¹ = I → Identity Matrix (c) → (2) |A| = 0 → inverse does not exist (d) → (3) A(adj A) = |A|I → (a) → (4) (AB)⁻¹ = B⁻¹A⁻¹ → (b)
- �� A → incorrect mapping of adjoint relation
- �� B → mismatches identity and inverse rules
- �� C → incorrectly swaps inverse and identity mapping
Used: Option Grouping
Application: Match each property with standard theorem
Final Logic: Each identity-based rule uniquely fixes pairing
"0 → No inverse, I → Identity, reverse order in inverse product"
3 Assuming A, B, and C are appropriately sized invertible square matrices, which of the following expressions apply valid inverse properties?
1) (ABC)^-1 = C^-1 * B^-1 * A^-1
2) (A^T)^-1 = (A^-1)^T
3) (2A)^-1 = 2 * A^-1
4) The inverse of A is completely unique.
�� Product inverse reverses order �� Transpose-inverse property holds �� Uniqueness of inverse is valid
- 1 is correct: (ABC)⁻¹ = C⁻¹B⁻¹A⁻¹ → 2 is correct: (Aᵀ)⁻¹ = (A⁻¹)ᵀ → 4 is correct: inverse is unique → 3 is false since (2A)⁻¹ ≠ 2A⁻¹ (it equals ½A⁻¹)
- �� 3 → scalar inverse rule is wrong
Used: Elimination
Application: Check standard inverse identities
Final Logic: Scalar rule eliminates option C
"Inverse flips order, transpose preserves structure"
4 Identify the mathematically INCORRECT statement regarding matrix inversion rules:
�� Double inverse returns original matrix �� Identity is not result of double inverse �� Non-singularity required for inverse
- (A⁻¹)⁻¹ = A, not identity matrix → So option C is incorrect → Other statements correctly describe inverse properties
- �� A → correct identity property
- �� B → incorrect statement (correct rule is |A| ≠ 0), but option C is more fundamentally wrong inverse law
- �� D → correct condition
Used: Extreme Word Filter
Application: Check exact inverse identity law
Final Logic: Double inverse rule directly identifies error
"Inverse of inverse = original"
5 R₁ ↔ R₃ transformation represents which operation?
�� Rows are swapped �� No scaling involved �� Elementary row operation
- Swapping two rows is a row interchange operation → It changes determinant sign but not structure type
- �� A → involves multiplication, not swapping
- �� B → involves addition
- �� D → column operation, not row
Used: Contextual Matching
Application: Identify operation type from symbol
Final Logic: ↔ indicates interchange
"Swap = sign change"
6 What is the consequence if a row becomes zero after row operations on A = IA?
�� Zero row implies singular matrix �� Determinant becomes zero �� No inverse exists
- A zero row implies determinant = 0 → Hence matrix is singular → Singular matrices have no inverse
- �� A → identity cannot have zero row
- �� B → contradicts singularity
- �� D → valid operation outcome
Used: Elimination
Application: Use singularity rule
Final Logic: Zero row → determinant zero
"Zero row → zero determinant → no inverse"
7 Starting equation for EMI inverse via row operations is:
�� Identity matrix augmentation used �� Row reduction starts from A = IA �� Leads to inverse formation
- To find inverse using row operations, we start with A = IA → Then convert A → I to get IA⁻¹
- �� A → incorrect structure
- �� B → true but not starting row operation form
- �� D → irrelevant
Used: Substitution
Application: Identify standard setup
Final Logic: Augmented identity form is required
"Start with I on right"
8 Fundamental goal of C₂ → C₂ − 2C₁ is:
�� Elementary column operation �� Linear combination used �� Structure preserved
- Operation replaces C₂ with C₂ − 2C₁ → Used to simplify matrix without changing determinant rules
- �� A → swapping not involved
- �� C → division not performed
- �� D → not a full reduction
Used: Contextual Matching
Application: Interpret operation form
Final Logic: Linear combination defines operation
"C₂ minus multiple of C₁"
9 If |A| = 5, value of |adj A| is:
�� |adj A| = |A|^(n−1) �� For 3×3 matrix, power = 2 �� 5² = 25
- For n×n matrix, |adj A| = |A|^(n−1) → Here n = 3 → 5² = 25
- �� A → incorrect scaling
- �� C → incorrect exponent
- �� D → inverse relation not applicable
Used: Formula Application
Application: Apply adjoint determinant rule
Final Logic: Power rule gives 25
"adj raises power (n−1)"
10 Adjoint matrix is formed by:
�� Cofactor matrix is transposed �� Gives adjoint �� Used in inverse formula
- adj(A) = transpose of cofactor matrix → Hence cofactor matrix is basis of adjoint
- �� A → minors alone insufficient
- �� B → identity unrelated
- �� D → scalar matrix irrelevant
Used: Conceptual Matching
Application: Link adjoint definition
Final Logic: Cofactor transpose defines adjoint
"Cofactor → transpose → adjoint"
11 If evaluating the coordinate "area" (determinant) of matrix A yields |A| = -10, and adj A is successfully derived, what exact scalar must be multiplied into adj A to yield A^-1?
�� Inverse uses formula A⁻¹ = (1/|A|) adj A �� Given |A| = -10 �� So scalar becomes -1/10
- The inverse of a matrix is given by: A^(-1)=1/∣A∣adj(A) → Substituting |A| = -10: A⁻¹ = (1 / -10) adj A = -1/10 × adj A → Hence, the required scalar is -1/10, so Option B is correct.
- �� Option A → 10 ignores division by determinant
- �� Option C → -10 is not reciprocal form
- �� Option D → 1/10 misses negative sign from determinant
Used: Substitution
Application: Directly substitute determinant value into standard inverse formula
Final Logic: Scalar is always reciprocal of determinant
"Inverse = adj over det (flip the sign if det is negative)"
12 Using the Adjugate method to find the integral variables of AX = B, if A^-1 = Row 1: (1, 0), Row 2: (0, 1), and B = Column 1: (5, -2), what is the resulting column vector X?
�� X = A⁻¹B �� A⁻¹ is identity matrix �� So X = B
- From the matrix equation: AX=B → Multiply both sides by A⁻¹: X = A⁻¹B → Given: A⁻¹ = I (identity matrix) → So: X = IB = B → Therefore: X = (5, -2) Therefore, Option B is correct.
- �� Option A → unrelated transformation
- �� Option C → incorrect sign change without operation
- �� Option D → incorrect scalar multiplication assumption
Used: Substitution
Application: Identity matrix leaves vector unchanged
Final Logic: A⁻¹ = I ⇒ X = B
"Identity does nothing."
13 To solve a 2-variable linear system rigorously utilizing Cramer's Rule, what mathematically occupies the columns of Delta_y?
�� Cramer's rule replaces variable column �� Δy replaces y-column with constants �� Determinants are then evaluated
- In Cramer's Rule: Δ_y is formed by replacing the y-column with constants while keeping all other columns unchanged. → Hence Option B is correct.
- �� Option A → replaces with wrong variable column
- �� Option C → unrelated operation
- �� Option D → identity matrix is not involved in Cramer's rule
Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application: Identify rule definition of Δy construction
Final Logic: Δy = replace y-column with constants
"Y column replaced by constants."
14 If a Cramer's Rule evaluation for variable z yields Delta_z = 32 and Delta = 8, what is the conclusive value of z?
�� z = Δz / Δ �� Substitute values �� 32 / 8 = 4
- Using Cramer's Rule: z=Δ_z/Δ → Substitute values: z = 32 / 8 = 4 → Hence Option B is correct.
- �� Option A → incorrect multiplication
- �� Option C → inverse ratio error
- �� Option D → wrong power operation
Used: Substitution
Application: Direct ratio evaluation
Final Logic: Δz divided by Δ gives variable value
"Top over base."
15 P1 MCQ In determining system viability, if Delta = 0, Delta_x = 0, Delta_y = 0, and Delta_z = 0, the overall system of equations is classified mathematically as:
�� All determinants are zero �� System loses uniqueness �� Infinite solutions possible
- In Cramer's Rule classification: Δ ≠ 0 → unique solution Δ = 0 and at least one Δx ≠ 0 → no solution Δ = Δx = Δy = Δz = 0 → infinitely many solutions → Therefore system is dependent and consistent. → Option B is correct.
- �� Option A → requires at least one non-zero Δx
- �� Option C → requires Δ ≠ 0
- �� Option D → not a standard classification
Used: Option Grouping
Application: Match determinant conditions with solution types
Final Logic: All zeros ⇒ dependent consistent system
"All zero determinants = infinite solutions."
16 If Cramer's rule is applied and Delta evaluates precisely to 0 while Delta_y evaluates to -15, what does this mathematically prove regarding system existence conditions?
�� Δ = 0 �� Δy ≠ 0 �� System is inconsistent
- In Cramer's Rule: Δ=0, Δ_y≠0 → This condition indicates contradiction in equations. → Therefore, no solution exists. → Option C is correct.
- �� Option A → requires consistency conditions
- �� Option B → requires all Δ = 0
- �� Option D → variable cannot be directly inferred
Used: Elimination
Application: Match determinant conditions to system behavior
Final Logic: Δ = 0 with Δy ≠ 0 ⇒ no solution
"Zero Delta + nonzero Delta → no solution."
17 When formatting a multi-variable system into an augmented matrix for row reduction, where are the values of the constant equations placed geometrically?
�� Augmented matrix = coefficients + constants �� Constants form last column �� Used in row reduction
- In augmented matrix form: [A∣B] → B (constants) is placed as the rightmost column. → Therefore, Option C is correct.
- �� Option A → diagonal is unrelated
- �� Option B → row placement is incorrect
- �� Option D → constants are not scattered
Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application: Recall structure of augmented matrix
Final Logic: Constants always form rightmost column
"Constants sit at the end."
18 During the forward elimination stage of row reduction on an augmented matrix, what shape is the coefficient partition of the matrix attempting to achieve?
�� Forward elimination zeros below pivots �� Creates staircase structure �� Leads to back substitution
Row reduction transforms the system into an upper triangular form: Upper Triangular Matrix → This structure allows back substitution. → Hence Option C is correct.
- �� Option A → lower triangular is backward elimination
- �� Option B → scalar matrix is unrelated
- �� Option D → skew-symmetric is unrelated
Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application: Match elimination process with matrix shape
Final Logic: Forward elimination produces upper triangular form
"Forward = Upper staircase."
19
Based strictly on the passage, what is the ultimate mathematical authority for determining if a linear system possesses a unique solution?
�� Determinant controls uniqueness �� Δ ≠ 0 → unique solution �� Δ is governing factor
- The passage states that Δ determines system behavior. → If Δ ≠ 0, unique solution exists. → Therefore Δ is the controlling quantity. → Option B is correct.
- �� Option A → identity matrix is not decision criterion
- �� Option C → Δx is not primary authority
- �� Option D → geometric interpretation, not algebraic control
Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application: Identify controlling variable in passage
Final Logic: Δ governs uniqueness
"Delta decides destiny."
20
If Delta crashes to zero and Delta_x evaluates to 12, what geometric and algebraic phenomenon occurs according to the passage?
�� Δ = 0 breaks uniqueness �� Δx ≠ 0 indicates inconsistency �� Parallel lines imply no solution
- From the passage: Δ=0, Δ_x≠0 → This implies inconsistent system. → Geometrically, lines are parallel and do not intersect. → Hence Option B is correct.
- �� Option A → requires Δ ≠ 0
- �� Option C → would require consistent intersection
- �� Option D → occurs only when all Δ = 0
Used: Elimination
Application: Match determinant conditions to geometric interpretation
Final Logic: Δ = 0 and Δx ≠ 0 ⇒ no solution (parallel lines)
"Zero Delta + nonzero Delta = parallel lines."
