CUET UG Accountancy Booster Test 2 Modes of Dissolution of Partnership Firm
📌 Answers are locked once submitted — results and explanations appear at the end.
QUESTION 1 OF 20
Why must a Realisation Account be prepared during the settlement of accounts on dissolution?
QUESTION 2 OF 20
Sequence the payment order out of realized assets under Section 48 strictly:
1. Residue distribution
2. Debts to third parties
3. Proportionate capital payout
4. Partner loan advances
QUESTION 3 OF 20
Assertion (A): Deficiencies of capital are treated as losses during dissolution.
Reason (R): Such losses are first paid out of the capital of partners.
QUESTION 4 OF 20
Consider the treatment of losses:
I. Paid next out of capital of partners.
II. Lastly by partners individually in their capital ratio.
QUESTION 5 OF 20
Firm X realizes Rs. 80,000 from assets but owes Rs. 1,00,000 to third parties and Rs. 20,000 to partner loans. There are no profits and partner capitals are zero. What must the partners do?
QUESTION 6 OF 20
Partners X and Y share profits in 3:2. Realization loss is Rs. 10,000. How is this loss transferred to their capital accounts?
QUESTION 7 OF 20
When paying debts to third parties from realized assets, what is the status of secured versus unsecured loans?
QUESTION 8 OF 20
After paying all outside debts, a firm has Rs. 12,000 left. Partner A has advanced a loan of Rs. 10,000 and Partner B has advanced Rs. 20,000. How will the Rs. 12,000 be distributed?
QUESTION 9 OF 20
Match the distribution order (List 1) with the entity receiving payment (List 2) during asset application:
| List 1 | List 2 |
|---|---|
| 1. First Priority | a. Outside third-party debts |
| 2. Second Priority | b. Partner loan advances |
| 3. Third Priority | c. Partner capital dues |
| 4. Fourth Priority | d. Residue in profit ratio |
QUESTION 10 OF 20
The ultimate residue after settling all claims and capital is distributed among partners in:
QUESTION 11 OF 20
Why do secured loans take precedence over unsecured loans in the payment of firm's debts?
QUESTION 12 OF 20
Assertion (A): Unsecured loans are paid off before partners' loans.
Reason (R): Partners' loans are considered outside liabilities.
QUESTION 13 OF 20
Regarding Section 49:
I. Firm property is applied first to firm debts.
II. Surplus of firm property is divided among partners for their private liabilities.
QUESTION 14 OF 20
Does the private property of a partner under Section 49 include properties of their spouse and children?
QUESTION 15 OF 20
The amount a partner must contribute to the firm if assets are inadequate is limited to:
QUESTION 16 OF 20
Partner P has private assets of Rs. 1,00,000, private debts of Rs. 1,10,000. Firm has a deficiency of Rs. 30,000. What is P's contribution to the firm?
QUESTION 17 OF 20
QUESTION 18 OF 20
QUESTION 19 OF 20
Under Garner vs. Murray, the capital ratio used to distribute the capital loss is calculated as of which date?
QUESTION 20 OF 20
Partner X is insolvent with a Rs. 10,000 deficiency. Solvent partners Y and Z have capitals of Rs. 60,000 and Rs. 40,000 on dissolution. Calculate Y's share of the capital loss.
Test Complete!
Answer Review
1 Why must a Realisation Account be prepared during the settlement of accounts on dissolution?
Realisation Account records asset realization. Liabilities settlement is tracked. Net profit or loss is determined.
A Realisation Account is prepared during dissolution to record: Sale of assets Settlement of liabilities Realisation expenses Profit or loss on realization Its main purpose is to determine the net gain or loss arising from realization and settlement activities. Therefore, Option C is correct.
- Option A → Admission of partners relates to reconstitution.
- Option B → Realisation Account includes all realization activities, not only unrecorded assets.
- Option D → Garner vs. Murray concerns insolvency treatment.
Used
- Elimination
Application:
- �� Remove options unrelated to dissolution accounting purpose.
Final Logic:
- �� Realisation Account measures final realization result.
- "Realisation reveals profit/loss."
2 Sequence the payment order out of realized assets under Section 48 strictly:
1. Residue distribution
2. Debts to third parties
3. Proportionate capital payout
4. Partner loan advances
Outside liabilities are settled first. Partner loans follow. Capitals repaid afterward. Residue distributed last.
Section 48 prescribes the following order: 1. Debts to third parties 2. Partner loans/advances 3. Partner capitals 4. Residual profit distribution Thus, correct sequence: 2 → 4 → 3 → 1 Hence, Option D is correct.
- Option A → Residue cannot come first.
- Option B → Outside liabilities must be paid first.
- Option C → Capital payout occurs after partner loans.
Used
- Sequential Logic
Application:
- �� Apply statutory payment order under Section 48.
Final Logic:
- �� External claims always receive highest priority.
- "Outside → Loans → Capital → Residue."
3 Assertion (A): Deficiencies of capital are treated as losses during dissolution.
Reason (R): Such losses are first paid out of the capital of partners.
Capital deficiency represents loss. Losses are first adjusted against profits. Capital is not the first source.
A deficiency in capital during dissolution is considered a loss to the firm because the partner cannot fully meet obligations. However, the Reason is incorrect because losses are first adjusted against accumulated profits or reserves before affecting capital contributions. Therefore: Assertion is true. Reason is false. Hence, Option A is correct.
- Option B → Reason is incorrect.
- Option C → Assertion is true.
- Option D → Assertion is not false.
Used
- Conceptual Linking
Application:
- �� Separate treatment of deficiencies from payment sequence.
Final Logic:
- �� Deficiency is a loss, but not first paid from capital.
- "Deficiency = loss, not first capital charge."
4 Consider the treatment of losses:
I. Paid next out of capital of partners.
II. Lastly by partners individually in their capital ratio.
Losses may reduce partner capital. Individual contribution occurs in profit ratio. Capital ratio is incorrect.
Losses during dissolution are adjusted against partners' capital accounts after reserves and profits are exhausted. Statement II is incorrect because partners contribute individually in their profit-sharing ratio, not capital ratio. Thus, only Statement I is correct. Hence, Option B is correct.
- Option A → Statement II is incorrect.
- Option C → Statement I is correct.
- Option D → Statement I is not false.
Used
- Elimination
Application:
- �� Remove incorrect use of capital ratio.
Final Logic:
- �� Individual liability follows profit-sharing ratio.
- "Loss follows profit ratio."
5 Firm X realizes Rs. 80,000 from assets but owes Rs. 1,00,000 to third parties and Rs. 20,000 to partner loans. There are no profits and partner capitals are zero. What must the partners do?
Total liabilities exceed realized assets. Partners have unlimited liability. Deficiency must be contributed privately.
Total liabilities: Third parties = Rs. 1,00,000 Partner loans = Rs. 20,000 Total = Rs. 1,20,000 Assets realized = Rs. 80,000 Deficiency: [1,20,000 - 80,000 = 40,000] Partners must contribute this deficiency from private assets according to their profit-sharing ratio. Hence, Option D is correct.
- Option A → Total deficiency is Rs. 40,000.
- Option B → Partnership liability is unlimited.
- Option C → Third-party debts must also be paid.
Used
- Substitution
Application:
- �� Compare total liabilities with realized assets.
Final Logic:
- �� Deficiency must be privately contributed.
- "Unlimited liability fills deficiency."
6 Partners X and Y share profits in 3:2. Realization loss is Rs. 10,000. How is this loss transferred to their capital accounts?
Loss distributed in profit ratio. X gets 3/5 share. Y gets 2/5 share.
Profit-sharing ratio = 3:2 Realization loss = Rs. 10,000 X's share: 10,000 × (3/5) = 6,000 Y's share: 10,000 × (2/5) = 4,000 Loss decreases capital accounts, so they are debited. Hence, Option A is correct.
- Option B → Loss requires debit, not credit.
- Option C → Equal division incorrect.
- Option D → Ratio reversed.
Used
- Substitution
Application:
- �� Apply profit-sharing ratio to loss.
Final Logic:
- �� Loss allocation follows agreed ratio.
- "Loss follows sharing ratio."
7 When paying debts to third parties from realized assets, what is the status of secured versus unsecured loans?
Secured creditors have legal claim over assets. They receive payment priority. Unsecured creditors are paid afterward.
Secured loans are backed by specific assets and therefore enjoy priority over unsecured liabilities during settlement of debts. Hence, secured creditors are paid first from realized assets. Thus, Option C is correct.
- Option A → Priority system exists.
- Option B → Unsecured creditors are subordinate.
- Option D → Secured debts are paid from firm assets first.
Used
- Odd One Out
Application:
- �� Identify legally preferred liability.
Final Logic:
- �� Security creates payment priority.
- "Security means priority."
8 After paying all outside debts, a firm has Rs. 12,000 left. Partner A has advanced a loan of Rs. 10,000 and Partner B has advanced Rs. 20,000. How will the Rs. 12,000 be distributed?
Partner loans paid proportionately. Loan ratio = 10,000 : 20,000. Distribution follows 1:2 ratio.
Total partner loans: 10,000 + 20,000 = 30,000 Available cash = Rs. 12,000 Distribution ratio = 1 : 2 A receives: 12,000 × (1/3) = 4,000 B receives: 12,000 × (2/3) = 8,000 Hence, Option B is correct.
- Option A → Full payment impossible.
- Option C → Ratio ignored.
- Option D → Both partners must share proportionately.
Used
- Substitution
Application:
- �� Apply proportional loan distribution.
Final Logic:
- �� Insufficient cash requires proportional settlement.
- "Loans share proportionately."
9 Match the distribution order (List 1) with the entity receiving payment (List 2) during asset application:
| List 1 | List 2 |
|---|---|
| 1. First Priority | a. Outside third-party debts |
| 2. Second Priority | b. Partner loan advances |
| 3. Third Priority | c. Partner capital dues |
| 4. Fourth Priority | d. Residue in profit ratio |
Outside debts settled first. Partner loans next. Capitals afterward. Residue distributed last.
Payment order: 1. Outside liabilities 2. Partner loans 3. Partner capitals 4. Residual distribution Thus: 1-b, 2-d, 3-c, 4-a Hence, Option C is correct.
- Option A → Incorrect order.
- Option B → Residue cannot be second.
- Option D → Residue never comes first.
Used
- Option Grouping
Application:
- �� Match Section 48 payment order.
Final Logic:
- �� External claims precede internal claims.
- "Outside → Loans → Capital → Residue."
10 The ultimate residue after settling all claims and capital is distributed among partners in:
Final surplus belongs to partners. Distribution follows agreed profit ratio. Capital ratio is not used.
After all liabilities and capitals are settled, any remaining balance belongs to partners and is distributed according to the profit-sharing ratio. Hence, Option B is correct.
- Option A → Capital ratio applies in Garner vs Murray.
- Option C → Sacrifice ratio applies during admission.
- Option D → Gaining ratio applies during retirement.
Used
- Elimination
Application:
- �� Identify correct distribution basis after settlement.
Final Logic:
- �� Residual profit follows profit-sharing agreement.
- "Residue follows profits."
11 Why do secured loans take precedence over unsecured loans in the payment of firm's debts?
Secured loans are backed by assets. They receive payment priority. Outside liabilities follow legal preference.
Secured loans are protected by a charge over specific assets of the firm. Therefore, during dissolution, secured creditors receive priority over unsecured creditors in settlement of debts. This precedence is a standard principle followed in settlement of outside liabilities. Hence, Option D is correct.
- Option A → Partner guarantee is not the main reason.
- Option B → Government source is irrelevant.
- Option C → Section 49 mainly concerns firm vs private property application.
Used
- Elimination
Application:
- �� Remove options unrelated to legal security over assets.
Final Logic:
- �� Security creates legal payment priority.
- "Security gets priority."
12 Assertion (A): Unsecured loans are paid off before partners' loans.
Reason (R): Partners' loans are considered outside liabilities.
Outside liabilities get priority. Partner loans are internal liabilities. They are not outside liabilities.
Unsecured loans taken from outsiders are external liabilities and therefore are paid before partner loans during dissolution. However, partner loans are not treated as outside liabilities; they are internal obligations of the firm. Thus: Assertion is true. Reason is false. Hence, Option A is correct.
- Option B → Reason is incorrect.
- Option C → Assertion is true.
- Option D → Assertion is not false.
Used
- Conceptual Linking
Application:
- �� Differentiate outside liabilities from partner claims.
Final Logic:
- �� External creditors always precede partners.
- "Outsiders before insiders."
13 Regarding Section 49:
I. Firm property is applied first to firm debts.
II. Surplus of firm property is divided among partners for their private liabilities.
Firm property pays firm debts first. Remaining surplus goes to partners. Partners may use surplus for private liabilities.
Section 49 states: Firm assets must first be used to settle firm liabilities. Any surplus remaining after settlement is distributed among partners. Partners may then apply such surplus toward private liabilities. Thus, both statements are correct. Hence, Option A is correct.
- Option B → Statement II is also correct.
- Option C → Statement I is correct.
- Option D → Both statements are valid.
Used
- Elimination
Application:
- �� Verify both rules under Section 49.
Final Logic:
- �� Firm debts have first claim over firm assets.
- "Firm property first serves firm debts."
14 Does the private property of a partner under Section 49 include properties of their spouse and children?
Private property means partner's own assets. Family assets remain separate. Spouse and children's property excluded.
Under Section 49, private property refers only to the personal assets owned by the partner. It does not extend to independent assets owned by spouse or children. Therefore, family members' personal properties are excluded. Hence, Option C is correct.
- Option A → Family property is not automatically liable.
- Option B → Spouse's property is separate.
- Option D → Children's property is also excluded.
Used
- Odd One Out
Application:
- �� Identify legally separate ownership.
Final Logic:
- �� Only partner-owned assets qualify as private property.
- "Private means partner only."
15 The amount a partner must contribute to the firm if assets are inadequate is limited to:
Contribution depends on solvency. Private liabilities are deducted first. Net assets determine contribution capacity.
A partner can contribute toward firm deficiency only to the extent of net private assets available after settling private liabilities. Formula: Net Private Assets = Private Assets − Private Liabilities Thus, Option B is correct.
- Option A → Private liabilities must be deducted.
- Option C → Liabilities alone do not determine contribution.
- Option D → Contribution is not based on total assets percentage.
Used
- Formula-Based Elimination
Application:
- �� Apply solvency principle for contribution.
Final Logic:
- �� Only net available assets can be contributed.
- "Net assets determine liability."
16 Partner P has private assets of Rs. 1,00,000, private debts of Rs. 1,10,000. Firm has a deficiency of Rs. 30,000. What is P's contribution to the firm?
Private liabilities exceed private assets. Net private assets are negative. Partner cannot contribute.
Calculation: Private assets = Rs. 1,00,000 Private liabilities = Rs. 1,10,000 Net private assets: [1,00,000 - 1,10,000 = -10,000] Since net private assets are negative, the partner cannot contribute toward firm deficiency. Hence, Option D is correct.
- Option A → Partner lacks sufficient net assets.
- Option B → Negative net worth prevents contribution.
- Option C → Entire assets unavailable due to private debts.
Used
- Substitution
Application:
- �� Calculate net private assets.
Final Logic:
- �� Negative net assets mean no contribution possible.
- "Negative net worth = no contribution."
17
Insolvency means inability to pay deficiency. Capital account shows debit balance. Contribution becomes impossible.
The passage explicitly states that a partner is considered insolvent when they are unable to contribute toward the deficiency in their capital account that shows a final debit balance. Hence, Option A is correct.
- Option B → Refusal alone does not define insolvency.
- Option C → Comparison with firm liabilities irrelevant.
- Option D → Insanity differs from insolvency.
Used
- Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application:
- �� Identify exact definition from passage wording.
Final Logic:
- �� Insolvency means inability to meet capital deficiency.
- "Cannot pay deficiency = insolvent."
18
Insolvent partner deficiency is unrecoverable. Firm treats it as capital loss. Garner vs Murray applies.
The passage directly states: "the sum not recoverable is treated as capital loss for the firm." Therefore, unrecoverable deficiency from insolvent partner becomes capital loss. Hence, Option B is correct.
- Option A → Not operational loss.
- Option C → Different from realization loss.
- Option D → Unrelated to revaluation.
Used
- Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application:
- �� Extract exact accounting treatment from passage.
Final Logic:
- �� Insolvent deficiency creates capital loss.
- "Unrecoverable deficiency = capital loss."
19 Under Garner vs. Murray, the capital ratio used to distribute the capital loss is calculated as of which date?
Garner vs Murray uses final capitals. Capitals considered on dissolution date. Solvent partners bear deficiency accordingly.
According to Garner vs. Murray, solvent partners share the insolvent partner's deficiency in the ratio of their capitals as existing on the date of dissolution. Therefore, Option D is correct.
- Option A → Beginning balances are irrelevant.
- Option B → Admission date unrelated.
- Option C → Previous year-end not applicable.
Used
- Elimination
Application:
- �� Identify exact date used for capital ratio.
Final Logic:
- �� Dissolution-date capitals determine sharing.
- "Garner uses dissolution capitals."
20 Partner X is insolvent with a Rs. 10,000 deficiency. Solvent partners Y and Z have capitals of Rs. 60,000 and Rs. 40,000 on dissolution. Calculate Y's share of the capital loss.
Loss shared in capital ratio. Capital ratio = 60,000 : 40,000. Y bears 60%.
Capital ratio of Y and Z: 60,000: 40,000 = 3: 2 Total deficiency = Rs. 10,000 Y's share: 10,000 × (3/5) = 6,000 Thus, Option C is correct.
- Option A → Equal division incorrect.
- Option B → Wrong ratio application.
- Option D → Entire loss not borne by Y alone.
Used
- Substitution
Application:
- �� Apply capital ratio under Garner vs Murray.
Final Logic:
- �� Y bears deficiency according to capital proportion.
- "Garner loss follows capital ratio."
