CUET UG Accountancy Booster Test 2 Judicial Dissolution of Partnership Firm
π Answers are locked once submitted β results and explanations appear at the end.
QUESTION 1 OF 20
Consider the following regarding the insanity of a partner:
I. It results in compulsory dissolution without a court order.
II. It is a ground for dissolution by the court at the suit of a partner.
III. The insane partner cannot file the suit themselves; another partner must do it.
QUESTION 2 OF 20
Partner A suffers a severe accident, leaving them permanently incapable of performing their duties. Partner B wants to dissolve the firm. How can this be executed?
QUESTION 3 OF 20
Match the concepts related to partner misconduct:
| List 1 | List 2 |
|---|---|
| 1. Misconduct Impact | a. Adversely affects business |
| 2. Court's Role | b. May order dissolution |
| 3. Innocent Partner | c. Files the suit |
| 4. Dissolution Type | d. Dissolution by Court |
QUESTION 4 OF 20
Which of the following is conceptually true regarding a partner persistently committing a breach of agreement?
QUESTION 5 OF 20
Assertion (A): Transferring a partner's entire interest to a third party is a valid ground for court-ordered dissolution.
Reason (R): It introduces a stranger to the firm without the consent of other partners, altering the agreed economic relationship.
QUESTION 6 OF 20
When ownership changes due to court-ordered dissolution, how is the realization loss formulaically distributed?
QUESTION 7 OF 20
What specifically states that a firm can be dissolved if its business cannot be carried on except at a loss?
QUESTION 8 OF 20
A firm is dissolved due to business impracticality. Realisation expenses are Rs. 5,000. A partner, X, agreed to bear expenses but the firm paid the actual Rs. 5,000. What amount is debited to X's capital account?
QUESTION 9 OF 20
Arrange the steps when the court dissolves a firm on just and equitable grounds:
1. Transfer of Assets to Realisation Account
2. Court passes dissolution order
3. Payment of firm's debts
4. Settlement of partners' capital accounts
QUESTION 10 OF 20
Which of the following does NOT fall under the court's discretion for dissolution?
QUESTION 11 OF 20
On termination of business, the firm's total assets realized Rs. 2,00,000. Creditors are Rs. 90,000, Bank Overdraft is Rs. 20,000. If Realisation expenses are Rs. 5,000, what is the total cash outflow to external parties and expenses?
QUESTION 12 OF 20
Which equation conceptually represents the settlement difference between firm closure and partnership reconstitution?
QUESTION 13 OF 20
In the context of asset treatment, why are assets sold rather than revalued upon dissolution of a firm?
QUESTION 14 OF 20
Assertion (A): Secured loans have precedence over unsecured loans during liability settlement on dissolution.
Reason (R): Section 48 dictates the exact priority of external liabilities being paid before partner loans and capital.
QUESTION 15 OF 20
In a "no intervention case" (dissolution by agreement/notice):
I. The court appoints a liquidator.
II. Partners can mutually agree to dissolve at any time.
III. In a partnership at will, written notice by one partner suffices.
QUESTION 16 OF 20
The court orders dissolution of XYZ firm. The firm has an unrecorded liability of Rs. 10,000 which is paid. How is this recorded in the books?
QUESTION 17 OF 20
Arrange the accounting steps when there is continuity in partnership (reconstitution) compared to dissolution:
1. Revaluation of Assets
2. Adjustment of Goodwill
3. Preparation of New Balance Sheet
4. Distribution of Accumulated Profits
QUESTION 18 OF 20
Match the journal entries to the treatments when the firm ends:
| List 1 | List 2 |
|---|---|
| 1. Unrecorded Asset Sold | a. Bank Dr. to Realisation |
| 2. Partner Takes Over Liability | b. Realisation Dr. to Partner's Capital A/c |
| 3. Asset Taken by Partner | c. Partner's Capital A/c Dr. to Realisation |
| 4. Expense Paid by Firm | d. Realisation Dr. to Bank |
QUESTION 19 OF 20
QUESTION 20 OF 20
Test Complete!
Answer Review
1 Consider the following regarding the insanity of a partner:
I. It results in compulsory dissolution without a court order.
II. It is a ground for dissolution by the court at the suit of a partner.
III. The insane partner cannot file the suit themselves; another partner must do it.
Insanity is a ground for dissolution by court. A partner must file the suit. It is not automatic compulsory dissolution.
Under the Indian Partnership Act, unsoundness of mind of a partner is a valid ground for dissolution of the firm by the court. However, dissolution does not happen automatically. A partner must file a suit before the court seeking dissolution. Therefore, Statement II is correct. Statement III is also correct because an insane partner is legally incapable of instituting the suit themselves, so another competent partner must approach the court. Statement I is incorrect because compulsory dissolution occurs in situations like illegality of business, not insanity of a partner.
- Option A β Incorrect because Statement III is also correct.
- Option B β Incorrect because Statement I is wrong.
- Option D β Incorrect because insanity does not cause automatic compulsory dissolution.
Used
- Elimination
Application:
- οΏ½οΏ½ Eliminate statements confusing court dissolution with compulsory dissolution.
Final Logic:
- οΏ½οΏ½ Insanity requires court intervention; therefore only II and III are correct.
- "Insanity = Court, not automatic."
2 Partner A suffers a severe accident, leaving them permanently incapable of performing their duties. Partner B wants to dissolve the firm. How can this be executed?
Permanent incapacity is a court ground. Court intervention is required. Dissolution is not automatic.
Permanent incapacity of a partner is one of the grounds under dissolution by court. Since Partner A cannot perform duties permanently, Partner B can approach the court and file a suit seeking dissolution of the firm. Hence, Option A is correct. Option B is incorrect because incapacity does not automatically dissolve the firm. Option C is incorrect because notice applies to partnership at will, not incapacity. Option D is incorrect because compulsory dissolution applies in cases like unlawful business activities.
- Option B β Dissolution is not automatic.
- Option C β Written notice relates to partnership at will.
- Option D β Incapacity is not compulsory dissolution.
Used
- Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application:
- οΏ½οΏ½ Identify the legal context related to "court-ordered dissolution."
Final Logic:
- οΏ½οΏ½ Permanent incapacity requires a court suit by another partner.
- "Incapacity β Court Capacity."
3 Match the concepts related to partner misconduct:
| List 1 | List 2 |
|---|---|
| 1. Misconduct Impact | a. Adversely affects business |
| 2. Court's Role | b. May order dissolution |
| 3. Innocent Partner | c. Files the suit |
| 4. Dissolution Type | d. Dissolution by Court |
Misconduct affects business. Court may order dissolution. Innocent partner files suit.
Misconduct by a partner becomes a ground for dissolution when it adversely affects business operations. Therefore: Misconduct impact β adversely affects business Court's role β may order dissolution Innocent partner β files the suit Dissolution type β dissolution by court Thus, Option B is correct.
- Option A β Incorrect matching of misconduct impact and court role.
- Option C β Incorrect association of innocent partner and dissolution type.
- Option D β Most matches are incorrect.
Used
- Option Grouping
Application:
- οΏ½οΏ½ Pair logically connected legal concepts.
Final Logic:
- οΏ½οΏ½ Court dissolution and misconduct-related effects correctly align in Option B.
- "Misconduct hurts business; innocent partner sues."
4 Which of the following is conceptually true regarding a partner persistently committing a breach of agreement?
Persistent breach is a court ground. Innocent partner can sue. Dissolution is not automatic.
Persistent breach of partnership agreement adversely affects mutual trust among partners. Under the Partnership Act, such conduct gives the court authority to dissolve the firm if another partner files a suit. Therefore, Option D is correct. Option A is incorrect because dissolution by agreement requires mutual consent. Option B is incorrect because breach does not automatically bankrupt the firm. Option C is incorrect because dissolution is legally possible.
- Option A β No mutual agreement exists.
- Option B β Bankruptcy is unrelated.
- Option C β Court may dissolve the firm.
Used
- Elimination
Application:
- οΏ½οΏ½ Remove options containing "automatic" or legally unsupported outcomes.
Final Logic:
- οΏ½οΏ½ Persistent breach legally justifies court dissolution.
- "Repeated breach breaks partnership."
5 Assertion (A): Transferring a partner's entire interest to a third party is a valid ground for court-ordered dissolution.
Reason (R): It introduces a stranger to the firm without the consent of other partners, altering the agreed economic relationship.
Transfer affects partnership relationship. Outsider enters without consent. Court may dissolve the firm.
A partnership is based on mutual trust and agreement among partners. When a partner transfers their entire interest to an outsider, it changes the economic relationship and may force existing partners to associate with an unwanted third party. Therefore, this becomes a valid ground for dissolution by the court. The Reason correctly explains the Assertion; hence Option A is correct.
- Option B β Reason directly explains Assertion.
- Option C β Reason is true.
- Option D β Assertion is also true.
Used
- Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application:
- οΏ½οΏ½ Relate partnership principles to transfer of ownership.
Final Logic:
- οΏ½οΏ½ Third-party transfer disturbs mutual consent structure.
- "No stranger without consent."
6 When ownership changes due to court-ordered dissolution, how is the realization loss formulaically distributed?
Realisation loss is shared by partners. Distribution occurs in profit-sharing ratio. Capital accounts are debited.
Loss on realization is borne by all partners according to their profit-sharing ratio unless otherwise agreed. Therefore, Partners' Capital Accounts are debited and Realisation Account is credited. Journal Entry: Partners' Capital A/c Dr. ββTo Realisation A/c Hence, Option C is correct.
- Option A β Loss is not borne by one partner only.
- Option B β Equal ratio may not match profit-sharing ratio.
- Option D β This entry represents profit, not loss.
Used
- Formula-Based Elimination
Application:
- οΏ½οΏ½ Identify correct debit-credit treatment for realization loss.
Final Logic:
- οΏ½οΏ½ Loss decreases partners' capital balances.
- "Loss β Capital Dr."
7 What specifically states that a firm can be dissolved if its business cannot be carried on except at a loss?
Continuous losses are court grounds. Court may order dissolution. Section 48 relates to settlement rules.
If a business can only continue at a loss, partners may approach the court for dissolution. This falls under "Grounds for Dissolution by Court." Therefore, Option B is correct. Section 48 only explains settlement of accounts after dissolution.
- Option A β Section 48 concerns settlement procedure.
- Option C β Mutual agreement is different.
- Option D β Continuous losses do not create compulsory dissolution.
Used
- Elimination
Application:
- οΏ½οΏ½ Remove options unrelated to court grounds.
Final Logic:
- οΏ½οΏ½ Continuous losses are recognized court grounds.
- "Losses lead to court closure."
8 A firm is dissolved due to business impracticality. Realisation expenses are Rs. 5,000. A partner, X, agreed to bear expenses but the firm paid the actual Rs. 5,000. What amount is debited to X's capital account?
Partner agreed to bear expenses. Firm paid expenses initially. Entire amount recovered from partner.
When a partner agrees to bear realization expenses personally but the firm pays them, the partner's capital account is debited with the full amount paid by the firm. Journal Entry: Partner X's Capital A/c Dr. 5,000 ββTo Bank A/c 5,000 Therefore, Option D is correct.
- Option A β Arbitrary amount.
- Option B β Partial recovery is incorrect.
- Option C β Firm must recover expenses from partner.
Used
- Substitution
Application:
- οΏ½οΏ½ Substitute agreed liability into journal treatment.
Final Logic:
- οΏ½οΏ½ Partner reimburses full realization expenses.
- "Bearer pays fully."
9 Arrange the steps when the court dissolves a firm on just and equitable grounds:
1. Transfer of Assets to Realisation Account
2. Court passes dissolution order
3. Payment of firm's debts
4. Settlement of partners' capital accounts
Court order comes first. Assets transferred after dissolution. Debts settled before partner accounts.
The court first orders dissolution. Then assets are transferred to Realisation Account. After realization, external liabilities are paid. Finally, partners' capital accounts are settled. Thus, the correct sequence is: 2 β 1 β 3 β 4
- Option A β Court order must occur before accounting process.
- Option C β Assets must transfer before payment.
- Option D β Completely incorrect order.
Used
- Sequential Logic
Application:
- οΏ½οΏ½ Follow legal and accounting order of dissolution.
Final Logic:
- οΏ½οΏ½ Court order initiates dissolution process.
- "Court β Realise β Pay β Settle."
10 Which of the following does NOT fall under the court's discretion for dissolution?
Expiry of term causes dissolution by agreement/contingency. Court intervention is unnecessary. Other options are court grounds.
Expiry of the fixed term automatically dissolves the partnership according to the partnership agreement and does not require court intervention. Therefore, it is not a matter of court discretion. The other options are recognized grounds for dissolution by court.
- Option A β Valid court ground.
- Option B β Valid court ground.
- Option C β Valid equitable court ground.
Used
- Odd One Out
Application:
- οΏ½οΏ½ Identify the only non-court ground.
Final Logic:
- οΏ½οΏ½ Expiry of term occurs automatically.
- "Fixed term ends itself."
11 On termination of business, the firm's total assets realized Rs. 2,00,000. Creditors are Rs. 90,000, Bank Overdraft is Rs. 20,000. If Realisation expenses are Rs. 5,000, what is the total cash outflow to external parties and expenses?
External liabilities must be paid first. Add realization expenses. Total outflow = liabilities + expenses.
During dissolution, all external liabilities and realization expenses are settled before distribution among partners. Calculation: Creditors = Rs. 90,000 Bank Overdraft = Rs. 20,000 Realisation Expenses = Rs. 5,000 Total Cash Outflow: [90,000 + 20,000 + 5,000 = 1,15,000] Therefore, Option A is correct.
- Option B β Excludes one expense component.
- Option C β Includes only creditors.
- Option D β Incorrect partial total.
Used
- Substitution
Application:
- οΏ½οΏ½ Substitute all external obligations into total payment formula.
Final Logic:
- οΏ½οΏ½ External liabilities plus realization expenses equal total outflow.
- "Outside claims paid first."
12 Which equation conceptually represents the settlement difference between firm closure and partnership reconstitution?
Dissolution closes books. Reconstitution continues business. Different accounts are prepared.
In dissolution of a firm, business operations end permanently and Realisation Account is prepared to close books and settle assets and liabilities. In reconstitution, the firm continues operating, so Revaluation Account is prepared only to adjust asset and liability values without closing books. Hence, Option C is correct.
- Option A β Realisation and Revaluation are reversed.
- Option B β Equation is conceptually irrelevant.
- Option D β New Balance Sheet is also prepared after reconstitution.
Used
- Odd One Out
Application:
- οΏ½οΏ½ Distinguish continuation from closure.
Final Logic:
- οΏ½οΏ½ Dissolution closes books; reconstitution continues them.
- "Realisation closes, Revaluation continues."
13 In the context of asset treatment, why are assets sold rather than revalued upon dissolution of a firm?
Dissolution ends the firm. Assets must be converted into cash. Claims are settled through realization.
When a firm dissolves, it ceases to exist. Therefore, its assets are sold to generate cash required for payment of creditors, liabilities, and settlement among partners. Revaluation alone is insufficient because actual cash realization is necessary. Hence, Option D is correct.
- Option A β Revaluation is not prohibited.
- Option B β Purpose is settlement, not increasing capital.
- Option C β New business formation is unrelated.
Used
- Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application:
- οΏ½οΏ½ Identify the purpose of dissolution accounting.
Final Logic:
- οΏ½οΏ½ Dissolution requires conversion of assets into cash.
- "End of firm = Sell assets."
14 Assertion (A): Secured loans have precedence over unsecured loans during liability settlement on dissolution.
Reason (R): Section 48 dictates the exact priority of external liabilities being paid before partner loans and capital.
Secured liabilities get priority. Section 48 defines payment order. External liabilities are settled first.
Section 48 of the Indian Partnership Act specifies the order of settlement during dissolution. External liabilities are paid before partner loans and capitals. Among external liabilities, secured creditors are given priority over unsecured creditors because their claims are backed by assets. Therefore, both Assertion and Reason are true, and the Reason correctly explains the Assertion.
- Option B β Reason directly explains the Assertion.
- Option C β Reason is true.
- Option D β Assertion is also true.
Used
- Conceptual Linking
Application:
- οΏ½οΏ½ Connect statutory rules with settlement priority.
Final Logic:
- οΏ½οΏ½ Section 48 establishes payment hierarchy.
- "Secured first, partners last."
15 In a "no intervention case" (dissolution by agreement/notice):
I. The court appoints a liquidator.
II. Partners can mutually agree to dissolve at any time.
III. In a partnership at will, written notice by one partner suffices.
Mutual agreement can dissolve firm. Notice works in partnership at will. Court intervention is absent.
In dissolution by agreement or notice, court intervention is unnecessary. Partners may mutually decide to dissolve the firm at any time. In partnership at will, written notice by any partner is sufficient. Statement I is incorrect because no liquidator is appointed by the court in such cases. Thus, only Statements II and III are correct.
- Option A β Statement I is false.
- Option B β Statement II is also correct.
- Option D β Court-appointed liquidator is incorrect.
Used
- Elimination
Application:
- οΏ½οΏ½ Remove court-related statement from non-court dissolution.
Final Logic:
- οΏ½οΏ½ No intervention means no court appointment.
- "Agreement needs no judge."
16 The court orders dissolution of XYZ firm. The firm has an unrecorded liability of Rs. 10,000 which is paid. How is this recorded in the books?
Unrecorded liabilities are recognized during dissolution. Payment is made through bank. Realisation Account records settlement.
During dissolution, all liabilities must be settled, including previously unrecorded liabilities. When payment is made: Realisation A/c Dr. 10,000 ββTo Bank A/c 10,000 Thus, Option B is correct.
- Option A β Payment entry is incomplete.
- Option C β Liability is not directly adjusted to capital.
- Option D β Unrecorded liabilities cannot be ignored.
Used
- Formula-Based Elimination
Application:
- οΏ½οΏ½ Apply journal entry rules for dissolution accounting.
Final Logic:
- οΏ½οΏ½ Realisation Account records liability settlement.
- "Hidden liability enters Realisation."
17 Arrange the accounting steps when there is continuity in partnership (reconstitution) compared to dissolution:
1. Revaluation of Assets
2. Adjustment of Goodwill
3. Preparation of New Balance Sheet
4. Distribution of Accumulated Profits
Assets are revalued first. Profits are distributed. Goodwill adjusted before new balance sheet.
In reconstitution: 1. Assets and liabilities are revalued. 2. Accumulated profits/losses are distributed. 3. Goodwill adjustment is made. 4. A new Balance Sheet is prepared. Thus, correct order: 1 β 4 β 2 β 3 Hence, Option D is correct.
- Option A β Goodwill adjustment timing incorrect.
- Option B β New Balance Sheet cannot come early.
- Option C β Sequence mismatch.
Used
- Sequential Logic
Application:
- οΏ½οΏ½ Follow standard reconstitution procedure.
Final Logic:
- οΏ½οΏ½ Adjustments occur before preparing new Balance Sheet.
- "Revalue β Share β Goodwill β Balance."
18 Match the journal entries to the treatments when the firm ends:
| List 1 | List 2 |
|---|---|
| 1. Unrecorded Asset Sold | a. Bank Dr. to Realisation |
| 2. Partner Takes Over Liability | b. Realisation Dr. to Partner's Capital A/c |
| 3. Asset Taken by Partner | c. Partner's Capital A/c Dr. to Realisation |
| 4. Expense Paid by Firm | d. Realisation Dr. to Bank |
Asset sold increases bank. Liability takeover reduces realization burden. Expenses reduce bank balance.
Correct journal treatments are: 1. Unrecorded asset sold β Bank Dr. to Realisation 2. Partner takes over liability β Realisation Dr. to Partner's Capital 3. Asset taken by partner β Partner's Capital Dr. to Realisation 4. Expense paid by firm β Realisation Dr. to Bank Therefore, Option A is correct.
- Option B β Journal entries mismatched.
- Option C β Asset and liability treatments incorrect.
- Option D β Multiple incorrect pairings.
Used
- Option Grouping
Application:
- οΏ½οΏ½ Match journal logic with transaction type.
Final Logic:
- οΏ½οΏ½ Debit-credit rules align only in Option A.
- "Sale brings Bank; expense drains Bank."
19
Revaluation is used during continuation. Realisation is used only in dissolution. Books remain open in reconstitution.
When the firm is not dissolved and books are not closed, changes in asset and liability values are recorded through Revaluation Account. Realisation Account is specifically used during dissolution. Therefore, Option B is correct.
- Option A β Used only during dissolution.
- Option C β Cash Account is unrelated.
- Option D β Drawings Account is personal.
Used
- Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application:
- οΏ½οΏ½ Identify account based on continuity vs closure.
Final Logic:
- οΏ½οΏ½ Revaluation applies when business continues.
- "Continue = Revalue."
20
Cash and bank already represent liquid funds. Fictitious assets are not realizable. Therefore, they are excluded.
During dissolution, all realizable assets are transferred to the Realisation Account. However: Cash in hand Bank balance Fictitious assets are not transferred. Cash and bank already exist in liquid form, while fictitious assets cannot be realized. Hence, Option C is correct.
- Option A β Plant and machinery are realizable assets.
- Option B β Debtors are transferred for realization.
- Option D β Investments are realizable assets.
Used
- Elimination
Application:
- οΏ½οΏ½ Remove all realizable assets.
Final Logic:
- οΏ½οΏ½ Only non-realizable/liquid items are excluded.
- "Cash stays; fictitious fades."
