CUET UG Accountancy Booster Test 1 Fundamentals of Dissolution of Partnership Firm
📌 Answers are locked once submitted — results and explanations appear at the end.
QUESTION 1 OF 20
Why does a firm dispose of all its assets upon dissolution instead of retaining them?
QUESTION 2 OF 20
Assertion (A): Dissolution of a firm necessarily brings in the dissolution of the partnership.
Reason (R): Under Section 39, firm dissolution means discontinuance of the relationship between all partners.
QUESTION 3 OF 20
Match the specific modes of ending the partnership relation (List 1) with their triggers (List 2):
| List 1 | List 2 |
|---|---|
| 1. Compulsory Dissolution | a. All partners becoming insolvent |
| 2. Dissolution by Notice | b. Partnership at will |
| 3. Happening of a Contingency | c. Expiry of a fixed term |
| 4. Dissolution by Agreement | d. Consent of all partners |
QUESTION 4 OF 20
If one partner retires but the remaining partners continue the business under the same name, what has technically occurred?
QUESTION 5 OF 20
Read the statements regarding reconstitution:
1. In reconstitution, assets and liabilities are revalued and a new balance sheet is drawn.
2. In reconstitution, the books of accounts are permanently terminated.
QUESTION 6 OF 20
Which of the following points correctly distinguishes the dissolution of a firm from the dissolution of a partnership?
QUESTION 7 OF 20
In the context of business closure, how is the firm's property applied under Section 49 of the Act?
QUESTION 8 OF 20
Arrange the required sequence for dealing with firm losses (deficiencies of capital) under Section 48:
1. Paid out of capital of partners
2. Paid first out of profits
3. Paid individually by partners in profit sharing ratio
QUESTION 9 OF 20
Under Section 48, how is a partner's loan to the firm structurally treated during settlement?
QUESTION 10 OF 20
When the business of the firm legally becomes unlawful or illegal, the firm is subjected to:
QUESTION 11 OF 20
Partners A, B, and C run a firm. C suddenly becomes permanently insane. B wishes to close the firm, but A wants to continue. Can the firm's identity be legally ended here?
QUESTION 12 OF 20
During the winding-up phase, realisation expenses of Rs. 10,000 are paid by the firm on behalf of a partner who agreed to bear them. What is the accounting entry?
QUESTION 13 OF 20
If an unrecorded asset is discovered during dissolution and taken over by a partner, how is it posted?
QUESTION 14 OF 20
What is the purpose of transferring the "Provision for doubtful debts" to the Realisation Account?
QUESTION 15 OF 20
A creditor to whom Rs. 10,000 is due accepts office equipment worth Rs. 8,000 and the remaining Rs. 2,000 is paid in cash. What is recorded in the Realisation Account?
QUESTION 16 OF 20
Before settling final capital accounts, accumulated profits and general reserves from the Balance Sheet are:
QUESTION 17 OF 20
Total assets transferred to Realisation A/c = Rs. 50,000. Liabilities transferred = Rs. 30,000. Assets realised = Rs. 60,000. Liabilities paid = Rs. 28,000. What is the profit on realisation to be transferred to capital accounts? (Assuming no other expenses)
QUESTION 18 OF 20
If a partner's capital account shows a debit balance and they are unable to contribute (insolvent), the unrecoverable sum is:
QUESTION 19 OF 20
QUESTION 20 OF 20
Test Complete!
Answer Review
1 Why does a firm dispose of all its assets upon dissolution instead of retaining them?
Assets are realized during dissolution. Claims and liabilities must be settled. Business closure requires settlement completion.
When a firm is dissolved, it ceases business operations permanently. Therefore, all assets are sold or realized so that liabilities, creditors, and partner claims can be settled properly before closure. Option C is correct because realization of assets is necessary for satisfying all claims against the firm. Option A is incorrect because dissolution does not aim at restructuring. Option B is incorrect because asset disposal is not done to inflate capitals. Option D is incorrect because tax avoidance is not the legal purpose.
- Option A → Dissolution ends the business rather than restructuring it.
- Option B → Capital balances are adjusted fairly, not inflated.
- Option D → Dissolution follows legal settlement procedures.
Used: Elimination
Application:
- Remove options unrelated to legal settlement of liabilities.
Final Logic:
- Assets are disposed of mainly to settle obligations.
"Sell assets, settle claims"
2 Assertion (A): Dissolution of a firm necessarily brings in the dissolution of the partnership.
Reason (R): Under Section 39, firm dissolution means discontinuance of the relationship between all partners.
Firm dissolution ends all relationships. Section 39 defines complete discontinuance. Partnership cannot continue afterward.
Under Section 39 of the Indian Partnership Act, dissolution of a firm means dissolution of partnership among all partners. Therefore, when a firm dissolves, partnership relations necessarily end. Thus: Assertion is true. Reason is true and correctly explains the assertion. Hence, Option A is correct.
- Option B → Reason directly explains assertion.
- Option C → Reason is true.
- Option D → Assertion is also true.
Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application:
- Check whether the reason legally explains firm dissolution.
Final Logic:
- Firm dissolution means ending partnership relations among all partners.
"Firm ends = partnership ends"
3 Match the specific modes of ending the partnership relation (List 1) with their triggers (List 2):
| List 1 | List 2 |
|---|---|
| 1. Compulsory Dissolution | a. All partners becoming insolvent |
| 2. Dissolution by Notice | b. Partnership at will |
| 3. Happening of a Contingency | c. Expiry of a fixed term |
| 4. Dissolution by Agreement | d. Consent of all partners |
Insolvency causes compulsory dissolution. Partnership at will dissolves by notice. Fixed term expiry is contingency.
Correct matching: Compulsory dissolution → All partners becoming insolvent Dissolution by notice → Partnership at will Happening of contingency → Expiry of fixed term Dissolution by agreement → Consent of all partners Hence, Option D is correct.
- Option A → Incorrect contingency matching.
- Option B → Notice dissolution wrongly matched.
- Option C → Agreement and notice mismatched.
Used: Option Grouping
Application:
- Match each dissolution mode with its legal trigger.
Final Logic:
- Each dissolution type follows a distinct legal basis.
"Insolvency–Compulsory, Will–Notice"
4 If one partner retires but the remaining partners continue the business under the same name, what has technically occurred?
Retirement changes partnership relation. Business continuity remains. Firm itself survives.
Retirement of a partner results in dissolution of the existing partnership agreement. However, if the remaining partners continue the business, the firm itself is not dissolved. Hence, Option B is correct.
- Option A → Business continues.
- Option C → No compulsory ground exists.
- Option D → Firm dissolution does not occur.
Used: Elimination
Application:
- Remove options involving complete business closure.
Final Logic:
- Retirement changes partnership structure only.
"Retire partner, continue firm"
5 Read the statements regarding reconstitution:
1. In reconstitution, assets and liabilities are revalued and a new balance sheet is drawn.
2. In reconstitution, the books of accounts are permanently terminated.
Reconstitution continues business. Assets and liabilities may be revalued. Books are not permanently closed.
Statement 1 is correct because during reconstitution: assets and liabilities may be revalued, and a revised balance sheet may be prepared. Statement 2 is incorrect because books continue since the business itself continues. Hence, Option C is correct.
- Option A → Statement 1 is correct.
- Option B → Statement 2 is false.
- Option D → Statement 1 is true.
Used: Option Grouping
Application:
- Differentiate reconstitution from dissolution.
Final Logic:
- Reconstitution changes structure, not business continuity.
"Reconstitute, don't terminate"
6 Which of the following points correctly distinguishes the dissolution of a firm from the dissolution of a partnership?
Firm dissolution may involve court order. Partnership dissolution often occurs through reconstitution events. Business closure distinguishes firm dissolution.
Dissolution of a firm may occur through: court order, compulsory grounds, agreement, or legal events. Dissolution of partnership often occurs due to: admission, retirement, death, or ratio changes without ending business. Thus, Option D best distinguishes the two.
- Option A → Economic relationships end in firm dissolution.
- Option B → Realisation Account is generally prepared instead.
- Option C → Business does not continue in firm dissolution.
Used: Elimination
Application:
- Identify the option correctly contrasting both concepts.
Final Logic:
- Firm dissolution involves full legal closure.
"Firm dissolves fully, partnership partially"
7 In the context of business closure, how is the firm's property applied under Section 49 of the Act?
Firm property settles firm liabilities first. Surplus belongs to partners afterward. Section 49 defines this priority.
Section 49 provides that firm property must first be used to pay firm debts. Any surplus remaining afterward is distributed among partners and may then be used toward private liabilities if necessary. Hence, Option A is correct.
- Option B → Private debts do not get first priority.
- Option C → Equal simultaneous settlement is not permitted.
- Option D → Court seizure is unrelated.
Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application:
- Apply Section 49 settlement principle.
Final Logic:
- Firm property first serves firm creditors.
"Firm property pays firm debts"
8 Arrange the required sequence for dealing with firm losses (deficiencies of capital) under Section 48:
1. Paid out of capital of partners
2. Paid first out of profits
3. Paid individually by partners in profit sharing ratio
Profits absorb losses first. Capital accounts are used next. Remaining deficiency borne personally.
Section 48 prescribes the following order: 1. Losses paid from profits, 2. Then from partner capitals, 3. Finally contributed individually in profit-sharing ratio. Thus, correct sequence: 2 → 1 → 3 Hence, Option B is correct.
- Option A → Capital cannot precede profits.
- Option C → Individual contribution occurs last.
- Option D → Incorrect order.
Used: Sequential Logic
Application:
- Follow statutory order of loss settlement.
Final Logic:
- Profits → Capitals → Personal contribution.
"Profit first, personal last"
9 Under Section 48, how is a partner's loan to the firm structurally treated during settlement?
Outside liabilities receive priority. Partner loans are distinct from capital. Capital settlement occurs afterward.
Partner loans are treated separately from capital contributions. During settlement: 1. Outside liabilities are paid first, 2. Then partner loans, 3. Then partner capitals. Hence, Option A is correct.
- Option B → Outside creditors rank first.
- Option C → Loans are not forfeited.
- Option D → General reserve treatment is unrelated.
Used: Elimination
Application:
- Apply settlement priority under Section 48.
Final Logic:
- Partner loans stand between outside liabilities and capitals.
"Outside → Loans → Capitals"
10 When the business of the firm legally becomes unlawful or illegal, the firm is subjected to:
Illegal business cannot legally continue. Law mandates closure. Compulsory dissolution applies.
If carrying on business becomes illegal due to law or legal changes, the partnership firm must compulsorily dissolve because unlawful business activities cannot continue legally. Hence, Option C is correct.
- Option A → Notice dissolution applies to partnership at will.
- Option B → Mutual consent unnecessary here.
- Option D → Illegality is not contingent dissolution.
Used: Elimination
Application:
- Identify the dissolution category linked with illegality.
Final Logic:
- Illegal business forces compulsory closure.
"Illegal business = compulsory end"
11 Partners A, B, and C run a firm. C suddenly becomes permanently insane. B wishes to close the firm, but A wants to continue. Can the firm's identity be legally ended here?
Permanent insanity is a court ground. A partner may file a suit. Court can legally dissolve the firm.
Under Section 44 of the Indian Partnership Act, the court may order dissolution when a partner becomes permanently insane. In this case, B may approach the court seeking dissolution of the firm. Option D correctly reflects the legal position. Option A is incorrect because permanent insanity need not wait for recovery. Option B is incorrect because expiry of term is unrelated. Option C is incorrect because insanity can become a valid ground for dissolution.
- Option A → Court dissolution may occur immediately.
- Option B → Partnership term is irrelevant here.
- Option C → Insanity may legally dissolve the firm.
Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application:
- Identify the legal consequence of permanent insanity.
Final Logic:
- Permanent insanity permits court-ordered dissolution.
"Insanity → Court authority"
12 During the winding-up phase, realisation expenses of Rs. 10,000 are paid by the firm on behalf of a partner who agreed to bear them. What is the accounting entry?
Partner agreed to bear expense personally. Firm paid on partner's behalf. Partner's capital account must be debited.
When a partner agrees to bear realization expenses personally but the firm pays them initially, the firm effectively pays on behalf of that partner. Therefore, the partner's capital account is debited and Bank Account is credited. Entry: Partner's Capital A/c Dr. 10,000 To Bank A/c 10,000 Hence, Option B is correct.
- Option A → Realisation Account should not bear expense ultimately.
- Option C → Entry direction incorrect.
- Option D → Bank payment is missing.
Used: Formula-Based Analysis
Application:
- Apply treatment for partner-agreed realization expenses.
Final Logic:
- Firm payment on behalf of partner reduces partner capital.
"Partner bears → Capital debited"
13 If an unrecorded asset is discovered during dissolution and taken over by a partner, how is it posted?
Unrecorded asset enters books only on realization. Partner takeover substitutes cash realization. Realisation Account receives credit.
Since the asset was previously unrecorded, no transfer entry exists earlier. When a partner takes over the asset, the partner's capital account is debited and the Realisation Account is credited. Entry: Partner's Capital A/c Dr. To Realisation A/c Hence, Option D is correct.
- Option A → Asset takeover requires partner adjustment.
- Option B → No cash receipt occurs.
- Option C → Bank Account unaffected.
Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application:
- Apply accounting treatment for unrecorded asset takeover.
Final Logic:
- Partner takeover increases realization value.
"Partner takes asset → Realisation credited"
14 What is the purpose of transferring the "Provision for doubtful debts" to the Realisation Account?
Debtors transferred at gross value. Provision offsets expected bad debts. Provision account gets credited.
When Sundry Debtors are transferred to the Realisation Account at gross value, the Provision for Doubtful Debts must also be transferred to the credit side to close the provision account properly. Hence, Option B is correct.
- Option A → Provision is not paid in cash.
- Option C → Provision is not treated as liability here.
- Option D → It is not distributed directly.
Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application:
- Match provision treatment with debtor transfer process.
Final Logic:
- Provision balances gross debtor transfer.
"Provision gives credit"
15 A creditor to whom Rs. 10,000 is due accepts office equipment worth Rs. 8,000 and the remaining Rs. 2,000 is paid in cash. What is recorded in the Realisation Account?
Liability already transferred earlier. Asset transfer already adjusted. Only additional cash payment affects Realisation Account.
The creditor's liability and the office equipment transfer would already have been accounted for when liabilities and assets were transferred to the Realisation Account. Therefore, only the additional cash payment of Rs. 2,000 requires a Realisation Account debit. Hence, Option C is correct.
- Option A → Entire liability already transferred earlier.
- Option B → Asset takeover already adjusted separately.
- Option D → Realisation Account is debited for payments.
Used: Elimination
Application:
- Identify only the fresh transaction affecting Realisation Account.
Final Logic:
- Only cash settlement remains to be recorded.
"Only extra cash gets recorded"
16 Before settling final capital accounts, accumulated profits and general reserves from the Balance Sheet are:
General reserves belong to partners. Distribution follows profit-sharing ratio. Capital accounts are adjusted before final settlement.
Accumulated profits and reserves represent undistributed earnings belonging to partners. Therefore, before final settlement, they are transferred to partners' capital accounts according to the profit-sharing ratio. Hence, Option A is correct.
- Option B → Reserves are not creditor payments.
- Option C → No direct bank transfer occurs.
- Option D → Reserves are not exclusively for expenses.
Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application:
- Identify ownership of accumulated reserves.
Final Logic:
- Reserves belong collectively to partners.
"Reserve belongs to partners"
17 Total assets transferred to Realisation A/c = Rs. 50,000. Liabilities transferred = Rs. 30,000. Assets realised = Rs. 60,000. Liabilities paid = Rs. 28,000. What is the profit on realisation to be transferred to capital accounts? (Assuming no other expenses)
Realisation gain on assets = Rs. 10,000 Liability settlement gain = Rs. 2,000 Total profit = Rs. 12,000
Calculation: Profit on assets realized: [60,000 - 50,000 = 10,000] Gain on liabilities settled: [30,000 - 28,000 = 2,000] Total Realisation Profit: [10,000 + 2,000 = 12,000] Hence, Option B is correct.
- Option A → Liability gain ignored.
- Option C → Overstated profit.
- Option D → Incorrect calculation.
Used: Substitution
Application:
- Compute gains from both assets and liabilities.
Final Logic:
- Realisation profit includes asset and liability settlement gains.
"Asset gain + liability gain = realization profit"
18 If a partner's capital account shows a debit balance and they are unable to contribute (insolvent), the unrecoverable sum is:
Insolvent partner cannot pay deficiency. Unrecoverable amount becomes capital loss. Solvent partners bear loss.
When a partner becomes insolvent and cannot contribute toward deficiency in their capital account, the unrecoverable amount is treated as a capital loss of the firm. This loss is borne by the solvent partners according to applicable rules such as Garner vs. Murray. Hence, Option A is correct.
- Option B → Bank does not bear partnership losses.
- Option C → Court does not forgive deficiencies automatically.
- Option D → Creditors are not made responsible.
Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application:
- Apply insolvency treatment principle.
Final Logic:
- Insolvent partner deficiency becomes capital loss.
"Insolvency = capital loss"
19
Only partner's own assets count. Family members' assets are legally separate. Private property excludes spouse and children assets.
A partner's private property includes only assets personally owned by that partner. The separate properties of wife and children are not legally treated as the partner's assets for settlement purposes. Hence, Option D is correct.
- Option A → Personal bank account is private property.
- Option B → Personally owned real estate is included.
- Option C → Personal vehicle is also private property.
Used: Odd One Out
Application:
- Identify the item not legally owned by the partner directly.
Final Logic:
- Family property remains separate from partner's liability settlement.
"Family assets stay separate"
20
Partnership liability is unlimited. Partners become personally liable. Net private assets may be used.
In a partnership firm, partners generally have unlimited liability. Therefore, if firm assets are insufficient to meet liabilities, partners must contribute personally from their net private assets according to settlement rules. Hence, Option C is correct.
- Option A → Creditors need not absorb the deficiency initially.
- Option B → Government bailout is not applicable.
- Option D → Dissolution aims to close liabilities, not create new loans.
Used: Elimination
Application:
- Apply unlimited liability principle of partnership firms.
Final Logic:
- Partners personally cover deficiency after firm assets are exhausted.
"Unlimited liability = personal payment"
