CUET UG Applied Mathematics Booster Test 3 - Advanced Arithmetic Functions
📌 Answers are locked once submitted — results and explanations appear at the end.
QUESTION 1 OF 20
Determine the fundamental reason why phi(1) = 1 according to the definition of Euler's totient function.
QUESTION 2 OF 20
Match the value of n = 12 with its corresponding arithmetic function values.
| List 1 | List 2 |
|---|---|
| 1. phi(12) | a. 0 |
| 2. tau(12) | b. 28 |
| 3. sigma(12) | c. 4 |
| 4. mu(12) | d. 6 |
QUESTION 3 OF 20
If p = 11, which of the following expressions correctly reflect the properties of simple arithmetic functions applied to this prime?
1. phi(11) = 10
2. tau(11) = 2
3. sigma(11) = 12
4. mu(11) = -1
QUESTION 4 OF 20
Which of the following is an INCORRECT interpretation of the bounds and nature of φ(n)?
QUESTION 5 OF 20
Calculate the mixture of arithmetic operations required to find the value of: φ(90) + τ(42) + σ(72) + μ(70). First, what is φ(90)?
QUESTION 6 OF 20
The constraint formula φ(n) = n(1 - 1/x)(1 - 1/y) requires x and y to be distinct prime factors of n. If n = 100, what are x and y?
QUESTION 7 OF 20
To exactly calculate τ(42), we factorize 42 = 2 × 3 × 7. What is τ(42)?
QUESTION 8 OF 20
Moving to the prime relation identity, if p is a prime number, what is the value of the expression τ(p) + σ(p) mathematically equivalent to?
QUESTION 9 OF 20
When computing σ(72) where 72 = 2^3 × 3^2, what is the actual sum of all its positive divisors?
QUESTION 10 OF 20
Based on the prime identity φ(p) + τ(p) = σ(p), evaluate the vector components for p = 13.
QUESTION 11 OF 20
Which area of number theory relies heavily on the fact that prime numbers p exclusively possess exactly two distinct positive divisors, locking τ(p) = 2?
QUESTION 12 OF 20
If the integral definition of σ(n) maps n to the sum of its divisors, what uniquely defines σ(n) for a composite number compared to a prime?
QUESTION 13 OF 20
If an integer n has 5 distinct prime factors and no repeated prime factors, what is μ(n)?
QUESTION 14 OF 20
Why does the Repeated Prime Factor Rule force μ(75) to equal 0?
QUESTION 15 OF 20
Calculate the sum of μ(75) + μ(85).
QUESTION 16 OF 20
For the product of three distinct prime numbers, what is the defined output of the Mobius function?
QUESTION 17 OF 20
Additive functions require f(xy) = f(x) + f(y) specifically when gcd(x, y) = 1. If gcd(x, y) ≠ 1, can the function still be universally categorized as a strictly additive function under these rules?
QUESTION 18 OF 20
Show that τ(n) is a multiplicative function for n = 24. Since 24 = 3 × 8, and gcd(3, 8) = 1, calculate τ(24) using τ(3) × τ(8).
QUESTION 19 OF 20
Given n = 10 (from p = 5), what are the individual values of φ(10) and τ(10)?
QUESTION 20 OF 20
For n = 10, determine σ(10) and verify if the identity n + φ(n) + τ(n) = σ(10) is mathematically true.
Test Complete!
Answer Review
1 Determine the fundamental reason why phi(1) = 1 according to the definition of Euler's totient function.
�� Euler's totient function counts positive integers that are coprime to n. �� For n = 1, the only positive integer less than or equal to 1 is 1. �� Since gcd(1, 1) = 1, phi(1) = 1.
Euler's totient function is defined as the number of positive integers x such that 1 ≤ x ≤ n and gcd(x, n) = 1. For n = 1, the only positive integer satisfying 1 ≤ x ≤ 1 is x = 1. Since gcd(1, 1) = 1, the number 1 is coprime to itself. Therefore, phi(1) = 1. Hence, Option B is correct.
- �� Option A → Incorrect because 1 is neither a prime number nor a composite number.
- �� Option C → Incorrect because phi(1) = 1 follows directly from the definition of Euler's totient function and is not an exception.
- �� Option D → Incorrect because the number of prime factors does not determine the value of the totient function.
Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application:
- Apply the definition of Euler's totient function directly to n = 1.
Final Logic:
- Only one positive integer satisfies the coprime condition for n = 1.
Only 1 counts for phi(1).
2 Match the value of n = 12 with its corresponding arithmetic function values.
| List 1 | List 2 |
|---|---|
| 1. phi(12) | a. 0 |
| 2. tau(12) | b. 28 |
| 3. sigma(12) | c. 4 |
| 4. mu(12) | d. 6 |
�� phi(12) = 4. �� tau(12) = 6 and sigma(12) = 28. �� mu(12) = 0 because 12 contains a repeated prime factor.
First express 12 = 2^2 × 3. Now evaluate each arithmetic function. • phi(12) phi(12) = 12 × (1 - 1/2) × (1 - 1/3) = 12 × 1/2 × 2/3 = 4. Therefore, 1 → c. • tau(12) tau(12) = (2 + 1)(1 + 1) = 3 × 2 = 6. Therefore, 2 → d. • sigma(12) The positive divisors of 12 are 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 and 12. Their sum is 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 6 + 12 = 28. Therefore, 3 → b. • mu(12) Since 12 = 2^2 × 3 contains the repeated prime factor 2^2, mu(12) = 0. Therefore, 4 → a. Thus, the correct matching is 1 → c 2 → d 3 → b 4 → a Hence, Option A is correct.
- �� Option B → Incorrect because all four arithmetic function values are mismatched.
- �� Option C → Incorrect because phi(12) equals 4, not 6.
- �� Option D → Incorrect because sigma(12) equals 28, not 6.
Used: Option Grouping
Application:
- Evaluate each arithmetic function separately and then compare the complete mapping.
Final Logic:
- Only Option A correctly matches all four arithmetic function values.
For 12: 4 - 6 - 28 - 0.
3 If p = 11, which of the following expressions correctly reflect the properties of simple arithmetic functions applied to this prime?
1. phi(11) = 10
2. tau(11) = 2
3. sigma(11) = 12
4. mu(11) = -1
�� Standard arithmetic function formulas apply directly to prime numbers. �� Every prime has exactly two divisors. �� The Möbius function of a prime number is -1.
For the prime number p = 11, evaluate each statement. • Statement 1: phi(11) = 11 - 1 = 10. Hence, Statement 1 is correct. • Statement 2: The divisors of 11 are 1 and 11. Therefore, tau(11) = 2. Hence, Statement 2 is correct. • Statement 3: sigma(11) = 1 + 11 = 12. Hence, Statement 3 is correct. • Statement 4: Since 11 has exactly one distinct prime factor, mu(11) = (-1)^1 = -1. Hence, Statement 4 is correct. Therefore, all four statements are correct. Hence, Option D is correct.
- �� Option A → Incorrect because Statements 3 and 4 are also correct.
- �� Option B → Incorrect because it omits Statement 4.
- �� Option C → Incorrect because it omits Statement 1.
Used: Substitution
Application:
- Evaluate each arithmetic function directly using the standard formulas for a prime number.
Final Logic:
- All four statements are true for p = 11, so Option D is correct.
Prime p ⇒ phi = p - 1, tau = 2, sigma = p + 1, mu = -1.
4 Which of the following is an INCORRECT interpretation of the bounds and nature of φ(n)?
�� φ(n) counts coprimes �� σ(n) sums divisors �� φ(n) is multiplicative
Euler's totient function counts positive integers coprime to n. It does not sum divisors. The divisor-sum function is: Thus Option C is incorrect. Other statements are valid: and for primes: Also, φ(n) is multiplicative for coprime arguments.
- �� Option A → Correct standard bound for φ(n).
- �� Option B → True property for primes.
- �� Option D → Euler totient is multiplicative.
Used: Odd One Out
Application: Identify which statement mismatches the definition of φ(n).
Final Logic: Summing divisors belongs to σ(n), not φ(n)
"Phi counts, Sigma sums."
5 Calculate the mixture of arithmetic operations required to find the value of: φ(90) + τ(42) + σ(72) + μ(70). First, what is φ(90)?
�� Factorize 90 �� Apply Euler product formula �� Final value is 24
Prime factorization: Apply Euler's formula: Simplifying: Hence Option A is correct.
- �� Option B → Incomplete multiplication.
- �� Option C → Incorrect simplification.
- �� Option D → φ(n) is less than n for n>1.
Used: Substitution
Application: Substitute prime factors into Euler's formula.
Final Logic: Product simplifies to 24.
"90 → ×1/2 ×2/3 ×4/5."
6 The constraint formula φ(n) = n(1 - 1/x)(1 - 1/y) requires x and y to be distinct prime factors of n. If n = 100, what are x and y?
�� Prime factorization of 100 is needed �� Distinct prime factors are used �� 100=2²×5²
Prime factorization: Euler's totient formula uses distinct prime factors only: Thus the distinct primes are: Hence Option C is correct.
- �� Option A → 50 is not prime.
- �� Option B → 4 and 25 are composite numbers.
- �� Option D → 10 is composite and not a prime factor.
Used: Elimination
Application: Keep only distinct prime factors.
Final Logic: Distinct prime divisors of 100 are 2 and 5.
"Totient uses distinct primes only."
7 To exactly calculate τ(42), we factorize 42 = 2 × 3 × 7. What is τ(42)?
�� Use divisor-count formula �� Exponents are all 1 �� Multiply (1+1)(1+1)(1+1)
Prime factorization: Number-of-divisors formula: Thus: Hence Option C is correct.
- �� Option A → Too few divisors counted.
- �� Option B → Misses combinations of factors.
- �� Option D → Overcounts divisor combinations.
Used: Substitution
Application: Insert exponents into divisor-count formula.
Final Logic: 2×2×2=8.
"Three primes → 2×2×2."
8 Moving to the prime relation identity, if p is a prime number, what is the value of the expression τ(p) + σ(p) mathematically equivalent to?
�� τ(p)=2 for primes �� σ(p)=p+1 �� Sum becomes p+3
For prime number p: and: Therefore: Hence Option A is correct.
- �� Option B → Misses one extra unit.
- �� Option C → Represents only σ(p).
- �� Option D → Ignores divisor contributions.
Used: Substitution
Application: Replace τ(p) and σ(p) using prime identities.
Final Logic: 2+(p+1)=p+3.
"Tau gives 2; sigma gives p+1."
9 When computing σ(72) where 72 = 2^3 × 3^2, what is the actual sum of all its positive divisors?
�� Use sigma product formula �� Separate powers of 2 and 3 �� Multiply divisor sums
Prime factorization: Sigma formula: Thus: So: Hence Option B is correct.
- �� Option A → Equals n only, not divisor sum.
- �� Option C → Incorrect multiplication.
- �� Option D → Underestimates divisor total.
Used: Substitution
Application: Apply sigma formula directly to prime powers.
Final Logic: 15×13=195.
"72 → 15×13."
10 Based on the prime identity φ(p) + τ(p) = σ(p), evaluate the vector components for p = 13.
�� φ(13)=12 �� τ(13)=2 �� σ(13)=14
For prime number: Euler totient: Divisor count: Sigma value: Hence: Thus Option A is correct.
- �� Option B → Uses incorrect φ(13).
- �� Option C → τ(13) is not 1.
- �� Option D → Incorrect sigma relation.
Used: Substitution
Application: Evaluate φ(p), τ(p), and σ(p) for p=13.
Final Logic: Prime identities give 12+2=14.
"For prime 13: 12, 2, 14."
11 Which area of number theory relies heavily on the fact that prime numbers p exclusively possess exactly two distinct positive divisors, locking τ(p) = 2?
�� Prime numbers have exactly two divisors �� τ(p) = 2 is a divisor-function property �� This belongs to arithmetic function theory
The divisor-counting function is defined as: For a prime number p, the only divisors are: Hence: This property is fundamentally studied under simple arithmetic functions in number theory, where functions like φ(n), τ(n), σ(n), and μ(n) are analyzed. Therefore, Option C is correct.
- �� Option A → Geometry bounds are unrelated to divisor-counting functions.
- �� Option B → Coprime limits mainly concern gcd and totient concepts, not τ(p)=2 specifically.
- �� Option D → Integrals belong to calculus, not arithmetic function theory.
Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application: Match the divisor property τ(p)=2 with the branch of number theory discussing arithmetic functions.
Final Logic: τ(p)=2 is a standard arithmetic-function property.
"Tau belongs to arithmetic functions."
12 If the integral definition of σ(n) maps n to the sum of its divisors, what uniquely defines σ(n) for a composite number compared to a prime?
�� Prime numbers have only two divisors �� Composite numbers have additional divisors �� Extra divisors increase σ(n)
For a prime number p: because its only divisors are 1 and p. However, a composite number has extra divisors besides 1 and itself. Therefore: For example: Hence Option B is correct.
- �� Option A → σ(n)=n+1 is true only for primes.
- �� Option C → Sum of divisors is generally greater than n for composite numbers.
- �� Option D → σ(n) can never be zero since 1 and n are always divisors.
Used: Option Grouping
Application: Compare divisor structures of primes and composite numbers.
Final Logic: Composite numbers have additional divisors, making σ(n) exceed n+1.
"Composite → extra divisors → bigger sigma."
13 If an integer n has 5 distinct prime factors and no repeated prime factors, what is μ(n)?
�� Möbius function uses distinct prime count �� μ(n)=(-1)^k for square-free n �� Here k=5
For a square-free integer with k distinct prime factors: Since n has 5 distinct prime factors: Therefore: Hence Option B is correct.
- �� Option A → Would occur when k is even.
- �� Option C → μ(n)=0 only when repeated prime factors exist.
- �� Option D → Möbius values are restricted to −1, 0, or 1.
Used: Substitution
Application: Substitute k=5 into μ(n)=(-1)^k.
Final Logic: Odd number of distinct primes gives −1.
"Odd distinct primes → negative Möbius."
14 Why does the Repeated Prime Factor Rule force μ(75) to equal 0?
�� Möbius function checks repeated prime factors �� 75 contains 5² �� Repeated prime factor gives zero
Prime factorization: The Möbius rule states: • If n contains any repeated prime factor, then: Since 5² appears, 75 is not square-free. Hence Option B is correct.
- �� Option A → Oddness has no role in determining μ(n).
- �� Option C → Being a multiple of 15 does not imply μ(n)=0.
- �� Option D → Factorization is incomplete and conceptually incorrect.
Used: Elimination
Application: Identify whether repeated prime factors exist.
Final Logic: Presence of 5² directly forces μ(75)=0.
"Square factor ⇒ Möbius zero."
15 Calculate the sum of μ(75) + μ(85).
�� μ(75)=0 due to repeated factor �� 85=5×17 has two distinct primes �� μ(85)=1
First evaluate: Since 5² repeats: Now: This has 2 distinct primes and no repetition. Thus: Therefore: Hence Option C is correct.
- �� Option A → Ignores μ(85)=1.
- �� Option B → Wrong sign evaluation.
- �� Option D → Sum cannot become 2 because μ(75)=0.
Used: Substitution
Application: Evaluate each Möbius value separately before adding.
Final Logic: 0+1=1.
"Repeated square gives 0; two primes give +1."
16 For the product of three distinct prime numbers, what is the defined output of the Mobius function?
�� Three distinct primes mean k=3 �� Use μ(n)=(-1)^k �� Odd exponent gives −1
For a square-free integer with k distinct primes: Here: Therefore: Hence Option B is correct.
- �� Option A → Applies when k is even.
- �� Option C → Would require repeated prime factors.
- �� Option D → Möbius outputs are never 3.
Used: Substitution
Application: Apply the Möbius formula directly with k=3.
Final Logic: Odd number of distinct primes gives −1.
"Three primes → negative sign."
17 Additive functions require f(xy) = f(x) + f(y) specifically when gcd(x, y) = 1. If gcd(x, y) ≠ 1, can the function still be universally categorized as a strictly additive function under these rules?
�� Additive functions require coprime inputs �� gcd(x,y)=1 is essential �� Without coprimality, definition fails
An additive arithmetic function satisfies: The coprime condition is part of the formal definition. If: the additive rule cannot be universally guaranteed. Hence Option B is correct.
- �� Option A → gcd condition is fundamental to the definition.
- �� Option C → Output type is irrelevant.
- �� Option D → Equality of x and y is unrelated.
Used: Extreme Word Filter
Application: Watch for absolute claims like "gcd does not matter."
Final Logic: Coprimality is mandatory in additive-function definitions.
"Additive needs coprime partners."
18 Show that τ(n) is a multiplicative function for n = 24. Since 24 = 3 × 8, and gcd(3, 8) = 1, calculate τ(24) using τ(3) × τ(8).
�� τ is multiplicative for coprime numbers �� τ(3)=2 and τ(8)=4 �� Product gives τ(24)=8
Since: and: the multiplicative property applies: Now: • τ(3)=2 because divisors are 1 and 3 • τ(8)=4 because divisors are 1,2,4,8 Thus: Hence Option A is correct.
- �� Option B → Incorrect interpretation of τ-values.
- �� Option C → τ(3) is not 1.
- �� Option D → τ(8) is not 4 multiplied by itself.
Used: Substitution
Application: Compute τ-values individually and multiply.
Final Logic: τ(24)=2×4=8.
"Tau multiplies for coprimes."
19
Given n = 10 (from p = 5), what are the individual values of φ(10) and τ(10)?
�� Coprimes to 10 are 1,3,7,9 �� Total coprimes = 4 �� Divisors of 10 are 1,2,5,10
For Euler's totient: because the integers coprime to 10 are: For divisor counting: because divisors are: Hence Option A is correct.
- �� Option B → τ(10) is not 2.
- �� Option C → 10 has only four divisors.
- �� Option D → φ(10) is not 6.
Used: Substitution
Application: Directly compute coprimes and divisors.
Final Logic: Both values equal 4.
"10 → four coprimes, four divisors."
20
For n = 10, determine σ(10) and verify if the identity n + φ(n) + τ(n) = σ(10) is mathematically true.
�� Divisors of 10 are 1,2,5,10 �� Their sum is 18 �� Identity balances correctly
The positive divisors of 10 are: Thus: Also: and: Therefore: Hence the identity is true and Option B is correct.
- �� Option A → σ(10) is not 10.
- �� Option C → Sum of divisors exceeds 14.
- �� Option D → σ(10) does not equal 24.
Used: Substitution
Application: Evaluate σ(10), φ(10), and τ(10) individually.
Final Logic: Both sides simplify to 18.
"10 + 4 + 4 = 18."
