CUET UG Accountancy Booster Test 1 Kinds of Companies
π Answers are locked once submitted β results and explanations appear at the end.
QUESTION 1 OF 20
QUESTION 2 OF 20
QUESTION 3 OF 20
When calculating liability basis, if a member has paid Rs. 8 on a Rs. 10 share, what is their exact liability if the company is wound up?
QUESTION 4 OF 20
Consider the following statements regarding membership basis:
1. A public company cannot be a subsidiary of a private company.
2. A private company needs at least 2 members.
Which is conceptually correct?
QUESTION 5 OF 20
Mr. A holds 500 fully paid shares of Rs. 100 each in a company limited by shares. The company goes bankrupt with Rs. 50 Lakhs in debt. What is Mr. A's liability?
QUESTION 6 OF 20
The uncalled liability of a shareholder in a company limited by shares is represented by the formula:
QUESTION 7 OF 20
A member guarantees to contribute Rs. 10,000 to a company limited by guarantee. During the normal active existence of the company, the creditors demand Rs. 5,000 directly from him. Is this legally valid?
QUESTION 8 OF 20
Arrange the chronological sequence of events triggering liability in a Guarantee Company:
1. Winding up process starts
2. Guarantee is undertaken at incorporation
3. Member contributes up to the guaranteed amount
QUESTION 9 OF 20
Assertion: Unlimited companies are permitted by the Companies Act but are generally not found in India.
Reason: There is no limit on the liability of its members, putting private property heavily at risk.
QUESTION 10 OF 20
Match the Following:
| List 1 | List 2 |
|---|---|
| 1. Unlimited Company | a. Private property can be used for debt |
| 2. Guarantee Company | b. Liability only at winding up |
| 3. Company Limited by Shares | c. Liability to the extent of unpaid share amount |
| 4. Body Corporate | d. Formed according to the provisions of Law |
QUESTION 11 OF 20
If a company wants to classify as a public company, it must ensure its articles do NOT contain which of the following restrictions?
QUESTION 12 OF 20
According to definition criteria, if a private company becomes a subsidiary of a public company, what is its status treated as?
QUESTION 13 OF 20
A firm has 1 single member and Rs. 60 Lakhs as paid-up share capital. Can it legally maintain OPC status?
QUESTION 14 OF 20
For an OPC to retain its specific legal conditions, the average annual turnover of three years should strictly not exceed:
QUESTION 15 OF 20
Three friends wish to start a private company together. Are they eligible based on the minimum member rule?
QUESTION 16 OF 20
For calculating the 200 member limit conceptually in a private company, the correct mathematical condition is:
QUESTION 17 OF 20
A company issues 10,000 shares of Rs. 10 each. What is the exact calculation of the minimum subscription amount required as per SEBI guidelines before allotment can proceed?
QUESTION 18 OF 20
If the minimum subscription is not received, the application money must be completely returned within how many days of the date of issue of the prospectus?
QUESTION 19 OF 20
Which of the following statements regarding comparative features is true?
1. Public companies have freely transferable shares.
2. Private companies have a hard limit of 200 members.
QUESTION 20 OF 20
Arrange the following entities sequentially by their maximum allowed membership limits (Lowest to Highest):
1. OPC
2. Private Company
3. Public Company
Test Complete!
Answer Review
1
Private companies impose transfer restrictions. These restrictions are written internally. Articles of Association contain these rules.
The passage clearly states that a private company restricts the right to transfer its shares through its Articles of Association. Therefore, Option C is correct.
- Option A β No government decree specifically imposes this restriction.
- Option B β SEBI regulates securities markets, not internal transfer restrictions.
- Option D β The Companies Act provides framework, but restriction is imposed through AOA.
Used
- Passage-Based Identification
Application:
- The exact phrase from the passage directly gives the answer.
Final Logic:
- AOA formally restricts share transfer.
"Private Shares = AOA Restrictions"
2
Employee-members are excluded. Limit applies to ordinary members. Maximum count remains 200.
Under the Companies Act, while calculating the 200-member limit of a private company, present and former employee-members are excluded. Hence, Option A is correct.
- Option B β Directors may still count as members if holding shares.
- Option C β Initial shareholders are included.
- Option D β Creditors are not members.
Used
- Legal Recall
Application:
- The statutory exclusion rule was recalled directly.
Final Logic:
- Employees are excluded from member count.
"Employees Don't Count"
3 When calculating liability basis, if a member has paid Rs. 8 on a Rs. 10 share, what is their exact liability if the company is wound up?
Liability equals unpaid amount. Face value is Rs. 10. Paid amount is Rs. 8.
Liability of a shareholder in a company limited by shares is limited to the unpaid amount on shares. Calculation: 10 - 8 = 2 Therefore, the remaining liability is Rs. 2. Hence, Option D is correct.
- Option A β Ignores amount already paid.
- Option B β Represents paid amount, not liability.
- Option C β Liability exists because shares are not fully paid.
Used
- Substitution
Application:
- Face value minus paid-up amount was calculated.
Final Logic:
- Unpaid balance = Liability.
"Liability = Unpaid Portion"
4 Consider the following statements regarding membership basis:
1. A public company cannot be a subsidiary of a private company.
2. A private company needs at least 2 members.
Which is conceptually correct?
Private companies need minimum 2 members. Public companies cannot exist as subsidiaries of private companies. Both statements are conceptually valid.
Statement 1 is correct according to the conceptual classification rules discussed in the chapter. Statement 2 is also correct because a private company requires at least two members. Thus, Option B is correct.
- Option A β Statement 2 is also correct.
- Option C β Statement 1 is also considered correct conceptually.
- Option D β Both statements are valid.
Used
- Statement Verification
Application:
- Each statement was independently checked.
Final Logic:
- Both statements are correct.
"Private Needs Two"
5 Mr. A holds 500 fully paid shares of Rs. 100 each in a company limited by shares. The company goes bankrupt with Rs. 50 Lakhs in debt. What is Mr. A's liability?
Fully paid shares create no further liability. Liability is limited to unpaid amount. No unpaid balance remains.
In a company limited by shares, shareholder liability extends only to the unpaid amount on shares. Since Mr. A's shares are fully paid, no further liability exists. Thus, Option C is correct.
- Option A β Liability does not arise once shares are fully paid.
- Option B β Shareholders are not liable for company debts beyond unpaid share amount.
- Option D β Private assets cannot be seized in limited liability companies.
Used
- Conceptual Application
Application:
- The principle of limited liability was applied.
Final Logic:
- Fully paid shares mean zero liability.
"Fully Paid = Fully Safe"
6 The uncalled liability of a shareholder in a company limited by shares is represented by the formula:
Uncalled liability equals unpaid share value. Paid-up amount is deducted. Remaining amount may be called later.
The uncalled liability of shareholders equals the unpaid portion of the nominal value of shares. Formula: \text{Uncalled Liability} = \text{Nominal Value} - \text{Paid-up Amount} Hence, Option A is correct.
- Option B β Unrelated capital categories.
- Option C β Incorrect addition.
- Option D β Does not represent shareholder liability.
Used
- Formula Identification
Application:
- The unpaid liability formula was applied.
Final Logic:
- Uncalled amount equals nominal minus paid-up.
"Uncalled = Unpaid"
7 A member guarantees to contribute Rs. 10,000 to a company limited by guarantee. During the normal active existence of the company, the creditors demand Rs. 5,000 directly from him. Is this legally valid?
Guarantee liability is conditional. It activates during winding up. Creditors cannot claim during normal operations.
In companies limited by guarantee, member liability becomes enforceable only during winding up. Thus, creditors cannot directly demand the amount during active business operations. Hence, Option B is correct.
- Option A β Guarantee does not apply during ordinary operations.
- Option C β Creditors cannot demand at any time.
- Option D β Guarantee companies are not limited strictly to share value.
Used
- Conceptual Understanding
Application:
- Timing of guarantee liability was examined.
Final Logic:
- Guarantee activates only on winding up.
"Guarantee = Winding Up Only"
8 Arrange the chronological sequence of events triggering liability in a Guarantee Company:
1. Winding up process starts
2. Guarantee is undertaken at incorporation
3. Member contributes up to the guaranteed amount
Guarantee is promised at incorporation. Winding up triggers liability. Contribution occurs afterward.
Correct sequence: 1. Guarantee undertaken during incorporation 2. Winding up begins 3. Members contribute guaranteed amount Hence, Option D is correct.
- Option A β Incorporation must occur first.
- Option B β Contribution cannot precede winding up.
- Option C β Contribution occurs after winding up starts.
Used
- Sequential Logic
Application:
- Events were arranged chronologically.
Final Logic:
- Guarantee β Winding Up β Contribution
"Promise First, Pay Later"
9 Assertion: Unlimited companies are permitted by the Companies Act but are generally not found in India.
Reason: There is no limit on the liability of its members, putting private property heavily at risk.
Unlimited companies legally exist. Members face unlimited liability. Private assets remain exposed.
Unlimited companies are legally permitted under the Companies Act. However, they are rare because members have unlimited liability and personal assets may be used to settle company debts. Thus: Assertion is true. Reason is true. Reason correctly explains the Assertion. Hence, Option A is correct.
- Option B β Reason directly explains Assertion.
- Option C β Reason is true.
- Option D β Both statements are correct.
Used
- AssertionβReason Analysis
Application:
- Unlimited liability concept was linked to practical rarity.
Final Logic:
- Unlimited risk discourages formation.
"Unlimited Company = Unlimited Risk"
10 Match the Following:
| List 1 | List 2 |
|---|---|
| 1. Unlimited Company | a. Private property can be used for debt |
| 2. Guarantee Company | b. Liability only at winding up |
| 3. Company Limited by Shares | c. Liability to the extent of unpaid share amount |
| 4. Body Corporate | d. Formed according to the provisions of Law |
Unlimited companies expose private assets. Guarantee liability arises at winding up. Share companies limit unpaid liability.
Correct matching: 1. Unlimited Company β c. Private property can be used for debt 2. Guarantee Company β d. Liability only at winding up 3. Company Limited by Shares β b. Liability limited to unpaid share amount 4. Body Corporate β a. Formed according to law Thus, Option C is correct.
- Option A β Incorrect matching for unlimited company.
- Option B β Guarantee company incorrectly matched.
- Option D β Multiple mismatches occur.
Used
- Option Grouping
Application:
- Each company type was linked with its defining characteristic.
Final Logic:
- Only Option C matches all correctly.
"Unlimited-Private Risk, Guarantee-Winding Up"
11 If a company wants to classify as a public company, it must ensure its articles do NOT contain which of the following restrictions?
Public company shares are freely transferable. Transfer restrictions belong to private companies. Public companies cannot restrict transfer rights.
A public company must not impose restrictions on free transferability of shares. Such restrictions are characteristics of private companies. Therefore, Option B is correct.
- Option A β Public companies may issue prospectus.
- Option C β AGM provisions apply generally.
- Option D β Independent directors are governance-related, not classification restrictions.
Used
- Conceptual Elimination
Application:
- Private company restrictions were identified and excluded.
Final Logic:
- Free transferability is essential for public companies.
"Public Shares Move Freely"
12 According to definition criteria, if a private company becomes a subsidiary of a public company, what is its status treated as?
Subsidiary relationship changes classification. Public company control affects status. It is treated as a public company.
Under company law provisions, a private company that becomes a subsidiary of a public company is treated as a public company. Hence, Option D is correct.
- Option A β It loses pure private-company treatment.
- Option B β No conversion into unlimited company occurs.
- Option C β OPC rules are unrelated.
Used
- Legal Recall
Application:
- Subsidiary classification rules were applied.
Final Logic:
- Subsidiary of public company = Treated as public company.
"Public Parent β Public Status"
13 A firm has 1 single member and Rs. 60 Lakhs as paid-up share capital. Can it legally maintain OPC status?
OPC has capital limit conditions. Paid-up capital exceeds permitted limit. OPC status cannot continue.
Though OPC requires only one member, it must also satisfy prescribed capital conditions. Since the paid-up share capital exceeds Rs. 50 Lakhs, OPC status cannot legally continue. Thus, Option B is correct.
- Option A β Member condition alone is insufficient.
- Option C β Capital condition is already violated.
- Option D β Natural persons can form OPCs.
Used
- Condition Verification
Application:
- Both membership and capital conditions were checked.
Final Logic:
- Capital limit violation disqualifies OPC status.
"OPC Capital β€ 50 Lakhs"
14 For an OPC to retain its specific legal conditions, the average annual turnover of three years should strictly not exceed:
OPCs have turnover limits. Three-year average is considered. Maximum allowed is Rs. 2 Crores.
As per the relevant rules, an OPC should not exceed an average annual turnover of Rs. 2 Crores over three years to retain OPC status. Therefore, Option D is correct.
- Option A β Refers to lower capital threshold.
- Option B β Incorrect turnover limit.
- Option C β Exceeds prescribed limit.
Used
- Direct Recall
Application:
- The statutory OPC turnover limit was recalled.
Final Logic:
- Maximum permitted turnover = Rs. 2 Crores.
"OPC Turnover = 2 Crores"
15 Three friends wish to start a private company together. Are they eligible based on the minimum member rule?
Private companies need minimum 2 members. Three friends satisfy requirement. Formation is legally valid.
A private company requires at least two members for incorporation. Since three friends are available, the requirement is fulfilled. Hence, Option A is correct.
- Option B β Seven members apply to public companies.
- Option C β One member applies to OPC.
- Option D β No such maximum of two exists.
Used
- Numerical Rule Application
Application:
- Minimum member requirement was checked directly.
Final Logic:
- 3 β₯ 2, therefore eligible.
"Private Needs Minimum Two"
16 For calculating the 200 member limit conceptually in a private company, the correct mathematical condition is:
Employees are excluded from count. Maximum limit is 200. Condition applies after exclusion.
The statutory rule requires that a private company's members, excluding employee-members, should not exceed 200. Thus, Option C is correct.
- Option A β Employees are excluded, not added.
- Option B β Directors are not automatically excluded.
- Option D β Ex-employees may also be excluded under conditions.
Used
- Formula Interpretation
Application:
- The membership condition was translated mathematically.
Final Logic:
- Eligible members excluding employees must not exceed 200.
"Exclude Employees, Then Count"
17 A company issues 10,000 shares of Rs. 10 each. What is the exact calculation of the minimum subscription amount required as per SEBI guidelines before allotment can proceed?
Minimum subscription = 90%. Total issue value = Rs. 1,00,000. 90% equals Rs. 90,000.
Total issue value: 10000 Γ 10 = 100000 Minimum subscription required: 90% Γ 100000 = 90000 Hence, Option D is correct.
- Option A β Represents total issue value, not minimum subscription.
- Option B β Too low.
- Option C β Represents 80%, not 90%.
Used
- Substitution
Application:
- SEBI's 90% rule was directly applied.
Final Logic:
- Minimum subscription = Rs. 90,000.
"SEBI Requires 90%"
18 If the minimum subscription is not received, the application money must be completely returned within how many days of the date of issue of the prospectus?
Refund becomes compulsory. Time limit is legally fixed. Maximum period is 130 days.
If minimum subscription is not received, all application money must be refunded within 130 days from the issue of the prospectus. Thus, Option B is correct.
- Option A β Relates to subscription receipt period.
- Option C β Too short and incorrect.
- Option D β Not prescribed.
Used
- Factual Recall
Application:
- The statutory refund deadline was recalled.
Final Logic:
- Refund deadline = 130 days.
"130-Day Refund Rule"
19 Which of the following statements regarding comparative features is true?
1. Public companies have freely transferable shares.
2. Private companies have a hard limit of 200 members.
Public shares are freely transferable. Private companies have 200-member limit. Both statements are correct.
Statement 1 is correct because public company shares are freely transferable. Statement 2 is correct because private companies cannot exceed 200 members (excluding employees). Hence, Option C is correct.
- Option A β Statement 2 is also true.
- Option B β Statement 1 is also true.
- Option D β Both statements are correct.
Used
- Statement Verification
Application:
- Each comparative feature was independently checked.
Final Logic:
- Both statements are valid.
"Public = Free Transfer, Private = 200 Limit"
20 Arrange the following entities sequentially by their maximum allowed membership limits (Lowest to Highest):
1. OPC
2. Private Company
3. Public Company
OPC has one member. Private company limit is 200. Public company has no maximum limit.
Membership limits: OPC β Only 1 member Private Company β Maximum 200 members Public Company β No maximum limit Thus, arranged from lowest to highest: 1 β 2 β 3 Hence, Option A is correct.
- Option B β Reverse order.
- Option C β Private company cannot have fewer members than OPC.
- Option D β Public company has highest limit.
Used
- Sequential Arrangement
Application:
- Entities were arranged according to membership capacity.
Final Logic:
- OPC < Private Company < Public Company
"One β Two Hundred β Unlimited"
