CUET UG History Booster Test 3 - Social Inequality and Alternative Views
📌 Answers are locked once submitted — results and explanations appear at the end.
QUESTION 1 OF 20
How did the Brahmanical concept of purity directly influence social interactions?
QUESTION 2 OF 20
Assertion (A): The Brahmanical system placed chandalas at the very bottom of the social hierarchy.
Reason (R): They performed activities regarded as particularly "polluting," such as handling corpses and dead animals.
QUESTION 3 OF 20
QUESTION 4 OF 20
QUESTION 5 OF 20
Match the elements from the Matanga Jataka story:
| List I | List II |
|---|---|
| 1. Matanga's birth | a. Lay down at the door |
| 2. Dittha Mangalika's action | b. Washed her eyes |
| 3. Matanga's protest | c. Outside the city of Banaras |
| 4. Mandavya Kumara's action | d. Refused alms to a chandala |
QUESTION 6 OF 20
What was the core philosophy expressed by Matanga when his son Mandavya refused him food?
QUESTION 7 OF 20
Fill in the blank: The cumulative evidence, both epigraphic and textual, suggests that while upper-class women may have had access to resources, land, cattle, and money were generally _______ by men.
QUESTION 8 OF 20
Which of the following is INCORRECT regarding women's property rights in early textual traditions?
QUESTION 9 OF 20
Which famous queen provides epigraphic evidence of a woman having access to resources, deviating from general patriarchal norms?
QUESTION 10 OF 20
Arrange the following texts reflecting changing social norms in chronological order:
1. Major Dharmasutras
2. Ashtadhyayi of Panini
3. Compilation of the Puranas
4. Manusmriti
QUESTION 11 OF 20
How does the Majjhima Nikaya text present a critique of the Brahmanical varna order regarding wealth?
QUESTION 12 OF 20
Fill in the blank: In the Majjhima Nikaya dialogue, Avantiputta concedes to Kachchana that if a Shudra is wealthy, there is no ________ amongst the varnas in terms of commanding obedience.
QUESTION 13 OF 20
Assertion (A): The Buddhists did not view social differences as rigid or natural.
Reason (R): The Sutta Pitaka states that humans originally lived in an idyllic, peaceful state before greed created inequalities.
QUESTION 14 OF 20
Which philosophy specifically rejected the idea of claims to high status on the basis of birth?
QUESTION 15 OF 20
Match the text/concept with its central theme:
| List I | List II |
|---|---|
| 1. Purusha Sukta | a. Wealth overriding varna hierarchy |
| 2. Majjhima Nikaya | b. Generosity of chiefs |
| 3. Puranaruru | c. Social contract theory |
| 4. Sutta Pitaka | d. Divine origin of Varnas |
QUESTION 16 OF 20
What alternative social scenario does the Tamil Sangam literature primarily depict?
QUESTION 17 OF 20
Which of the following is INCORRECT regarding the relationship between chiefs and bards in ancient Tamilakam?
QUESTION 18 OF 20
Assertion (A): In Sangam society, poets often sang praises of a chief's military endeavors.
Reason (R): The chief acquired wealth through warfare (like using a long spear) in order to fulfill his duty of sharing it with bards.
QUESTION 19 OF 20
Fill in the blank: The Sutta Pitaka myth suggests that if human beings were responsible for the creation of the system of kingship, they could also _______ it in the future.
QUESTION 20 OF 20
According to the Buddhist social contract theory, the institution of kingship arose out of:
Test Complete!
Answer Review
1 How did the Brahmanical concept of purity directly influence social interactions?
Purity and pollution shaped social behavior. Untouchables were viewed as polluting. Food-sharing reflected social hierarchy.
The Brahmanical notion of purity distinguished certain activities and groups as pure or impure. Those who considered themselves pure avoided accepting food from people categorized as untouchables. This practice reinforced social distance and hierarchy. Therefore Option C correctly reflects the impact of purity concepts on everyday interactions.
- Option A → Brahmanical norms promoted social separation, not universal inter-dining.
- Option B → Handling corpses was viewed as polluting, not a Brahmana duty.
- Option D → Shudras were not required to perform rituals to attain purity in this context.
Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application:
- Connect purity-pollution concepts with everyday social practices.
Final Logic:
- Purity rules resulted in avoidance of food-sharing with untouchables.
Purity → No Shared Food
2 Assertion (A): The Brahmanical system placed chandalas at the very bottom of the social hierarchy.
Reason (R): They performed activities regarded as particularly "polluting," such as handling corpses and dead animals.
Chandalas occupied the lowest social position. Their occupations were labeled polluting. Pollution ideology justified exclusion.
The Assertion is correct because Brahmanical texts placed chandalas at the bottom of the social hierarchy. The Reason is also correct because they were associated with occupations such as handling corpses and dead animals, which were considered polluting. This perception directly explains their degraded social status. Hence Option A is correct.
- Option B → The Reason directly explains the Assertion.
- Option C → The Reason is historically accurate.
- Option D → The Assertion is also correct.
Used: Elimination
Application:
- Verify both statements and check the explanatory link.
Final Logic:
- Pollution-based occupations explain the low status of chandalas.
Chandala = Pollution Label
3
Matanga was viewed negatively. Seeing him was considered inauspicious. Social prejudice was severe.
Dittha Mangalika's reaction of washing her eyes after seeing Matanga reflects the belief that contact with or even sight of a chandala was polluting. The subsequent beating reinforces the deep discrimination faced by such groups. Therefore Option B best captures the social attitude illustrated in the passage.
- Option A → The passage shows discrimination, not reverence.
- Option C → No evidence suggests special commercial acceptance.
- Option D → The passage clearly depicts unequal treatment.
Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application:
- Interpret the attitudes shown by actions in the passage.
Final Logic:
- The reactions indicate beliefs about pollution and inauspiciousness.
Wash Eyes = Inauspicious Sight
4
Buddhist stories questioned hierarchy. They highlighted marginalized voices. Alternative social realities emerged.
Stories such as the Matanga Jataka provide perspectives often absent in Brahmanical texts. They show discrimination but also resistance and alternative moral viewpoints. Historians use them to explore social realities beyond normative prescriptions. Therefore Option D is the best explanation.
- Option A → The story does not promote Manusmriti rules.
- Option B → The narrative challenges rather than justifies discrimination.
- Option C → The purpose was moral and social, not demographic.
Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application:
- Identify the broader social message of the narrative.
Final Logic:
- The story provides alternative perspectives on social inequality.
Matanga = Voice of Resistance
5 Match the elements from the Matanga Jataka story:
| List I | List II |
|---|---|
| 1. Matanga's birth | a. Lay down at the door |
| 2. Dittha Mangalika's action | b. Washed her eyes |
| 3. Matanga's protest | c. Outside the city of Banaras |
| 4. Mandavya Kumara's action | d. Refused alms to a chandala |
Matanga was born outside Banaras. Dittha washed her eyes. Protest involved lying at the door.
Matanga was born outside Banaras (c). Dittha Mangalika washed her eyes after seeing him (b). Matanga protested by lying at the doorway (a). Mandavya Kumara refused alms to the chandala (d). Hence Option C correctly matches all elements.
- Option A → Incorrectly matches Matanga's birth.
- Option B → Multiple pairings are misplaced.
- Option D → Several events are incorrectly associated.
Used: Option Grouping
Application:
- Recall each event and pair it with the correct action.
Final Logic:
- Only Option C correctly matches all four elements.
Birth–Banaras, Eyes–Wash, Protest–Door
6 What was the core philosophy expressed by Matanga when his son Mandavya refused him food?
Birth does not determine worth. Ethical conduct is more important. Matanga challenged hierarchy.
Matanga criticized the idea that birth alone grants superiority. He emphasized that arrogance and ignorance do not make a person worthy of respect or gifts. This reflects a moral challenge to inherited status and social prejudice. Therefore Option A is correct.
- Option B → Matanga rejects birth-based superiority.
- Option C → No such restriction is stated.
- Option D → The story promotes resistance, not passive acceptance.
Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application:
- Identify the moral lesson conveyed by the narrative.
Final Logic:
- The story rejects status based solely on birth.
Worth ≠ Birth
7 Fill in the blank: The cumulative evidence, both epigraphic and textual, suggests that while upper-class women may have had access to resources, land, cattle, and money were generally _______ by men.
Patriarchal norms dominated society. Men usually controlled major resources. Women had limited property rights.
NCERT notes that although some elite women possessed resources, most significant forms of wealth such as land, cattle, and money remained under male control. This pattern reflects the broader patriarchal structure of early Indian society. Therefore Option B is correct.
- Option A → Resources were actively managed, not ignored.
- Option C → Donation is not the central point.
- Option D → Wealth was not destroyed.
Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application:
- Connect resource ownership with patriarchal social structures.
Final Logic:
- Major economic resources were generally controlled by men.
Property → Patriarchy
8 Which of the following is INCORRECT regarding women's property rights in early textual traditions?
Women had limited property rights. Stridhana was recognized. Family wealth remained male-controlled.
Textual traditions allowed women to possess certain forms of wealth such as gifts, but they did not grant them unrestricted authority over family property. There is no provision allowing women to stake family resources in gambling. Thus Option D is the incorrect statement.
- Option A → Manusmriti contains such warnings.
- Option B → Gifts received during marriage formed part of stridhana.
- Option C → Women generally lacked equal inheritance rights.
Used: Odd One Out
Application:
- Identify the statement inconsistent with patriarchal property norms.
Final Logic:
- Option D grants powers unsupported by early texts.
Stridhana ≠ Treasury Control
9 Which famous queen provides epigraphic evidence of a woman having access to resources, deviating from general patriarchal norms?
Prabhavati Gupta exercised authority. Inscriptions record her role. She represents an exceptional case.
Prabhavati Gupta is known through inscriptions that demonstrate her access to power and resources. Her example is frequently cited by historians as evidence that some elite women could exercise authority despite prevailing patriarchal norms. Therefore Option C is correct.
- Option A → Kunti is an epic character, not inscriptional evidence.
- Option B → Draupadi is also an epic figure.
- Option D → Dittha Mangalika is from a Jataka narrative.
Used: Memory Recall
Application:
- Recall the NCERT example of an exceptional ruling woman.
Final Logic:
- Prabhavati Gupta is the key epigraphic example.
Prabhavati = Powerful Queen
10 Arrange the following texts reflecting changing social norms in chronological order:
1. Major Dharmasutras
2. Ashtadhyayi of Panini
3. Compilation of the Puranas
4. Manusmriti
Panini predates Dharmasutras. Manusmriti follows later. Puranas are compiled subsequently.
The generally accepted sequence is: Ashtadhyayi of Panini (c. 5th–4th century BCE), Major Dharmasutras (c. 500–200 BCE), Manusmriti (c. 200 BCE–200 CE), and later compilation of the Puranas. Therefore Option B presents the correct chronological order.
- Option A → Incorrectly places Dharmasutras before Panini.
- Option C → Reverses the historical chronology.
- Option D → Lists the sequence entirely backward.
Used: Elimination
Application:
- Recall approximate historical dates of major texts.
Final Logic:
- Panini → Dharmasutras → Manusmriti → Puranas.
Panini → Dharma → Manu → Purana
11 How does the Majjhima Nikaya text present a critique of the Brahmanical varna order regarding wealth?
Wealth affects social relations. A wealthy Shudra could command servants. Buddhist texts challenged rigid hierarchy.
In the Majjhima Nikaya dialogue, Kachchana asks whether a wealthy Shudra could employ people from higher varnas. Avantiputta agrees, showing that economic power could influence social relations. This critique weakened the idea that birth alone determined status. Therefore Option B is correct.
- Option A → The dialogue assumes that Shudras can possess wealth.
- Option C → This reflects Brahmanical ideology, not the Buddhist critique.
- Option D → No such proposal appears in the text.
Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application:
- Identify the central argument of the Buddhist dialogue.
Final Logic:
- The text emphasizes wealth as a practical challenge to birth-based hierarchy.
Wealth > Varna (Majjhima)
12 Fill in the blank: In the Majjhima Nikaya dialogue, Avantiputta concedes to Kachchana that if a Shudra is wealthy, there is no ________ amongst the varnas in terms of commanding obedience.
Wealth alters social interactions. Status is not completely fixed. Avantiputta accepts practical equality.
The dialogue concludes that wealth can allow an individual of any varna to command obedience. Avantiputta therefore accepts that there is no difference among varnas in this particular context. This directly challenges rigid social ranking. Hence Option D is correct.
- Option A → Purity is not the focus of the argument.
- Option B → Divinity is unrelated to the dialogue's conclusion.
- Option C → Conflict is not the missing term.
Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application:
- Follow the logical conclusion of the discussion.
Final Logic:
- The dialogue ends by removing distinctions in terms of practical authority.
Wealth Removes Difference
13 Assertion (A): The Buddhists did not view social differences as rigid or natural.
Reason (R): The Sutta Pitaka states that humans originally lived in an idyllic, peaceful state before greed created inequalities.
Buddhists rejected fixed inequality. Social divisions emerged historically. Human actions created social differences.
Buddhist texts describe an original state of equality and harmony. According to the Sutta Pitaka, greed and selfishness gradually produced inequalities. Since social differences arose through human actions rather than divine design, Buddhists did not consider them natural or permanent. Therefore Option C is correct.
- Option A → The Reason directly explains the Assertion.
- Option B → The Reason is historically correct.
- Option D → The Assertion is also correct.
Used: Elimination
Application:
- Check both statements and verify the explanatory relationship.
Final Logic:
- Human-created inequalities explain the Buddhist rejection of rigid hierarchy.
Greed Created Inequality
14 Which philosophy specifically rejected the idea of claims to high status on the basis of birth?
Buddhism challenged birth-based superiority. Merit mattered more than lineage. Alternative social ideas emerged.
Early Buddhism questioned the legitimacy of status based solely on birth. Buddhist teachings emphasized ethical conduct and personal actions rather than inherited rank. In contrast, the Manusmriti, Dharmasutras, and Purusha Sukta generally supported hierarchical social classifications. Therefore Option A is correct.
- Option B → Manusmriti supported birth-based hierarchy.
- Option C → Dharmasutras prescribed varna-based duties.
- Option D → Purusha Sukta explained the divine origin of varnas.
Used: Odd One Out
Application:
- Identify the option that challenges rather than supports hierarchy.
Final Logic:
- Only Buddhism rejects status claims based on birth.
Buddha > Birth
15 Match the text/concept with its central theme:
| List I | List II |
|---|---|
| 1. Purusha Sukta | a. Wealth overriding varna hierarchy |
| 2. Majjhima Nikaya | b. Generosity of chiefs |
| 3. Puranaruru | c. Social contract theory |
| 4. Sutta Pitaka | d. Divine origin of Varnas |
Purusha Sukta explains varna origin. Puranaruru praises generosity. Sutta Pitaka describes social contract.
Purusha Sukta presents the divine origin of varnas (d). Majjhima Nikaya emphasizes wealth over inherited rank (a). Puranaruru celebrates generous chiefs (b). Sutta Pitaka introduces a social contract explanation for kingship (c). Thus, Option C correctly matches all themes.
- Option A → Incorrectly exchanges several concepts.
- Option B → Misplaces Sutta Pitaka and Purusha Sukta.
- Option D → Contains multiple mismatches.
Used: Option Grouping
Application:
- Match each source with its best-known theme.
Final Logic:
- Only Option C correctly aligns all four pairs.
Purusha–Varna, Puranaruru–Generosity
16 What alternative social scenario does the Tamil Sangam literature primarily depict?
Generosity was highly valued. Chiefs supported bards and dependents. Sharing resources brought prestige.
Sangam literature portrays chiefs as patrons who acquired wealth and redistributed it generously. Their reputation depended on supporting poets, warriors, and dependents. This contrasts with rigid hierarchical models and highlights a culture of generosity. Therefore Option D is correct.
- Option A → Sangam texts do not primarily focus on varna segregation.
- Option B → Merchants did not rule over kings.
- Option C → The economy was broader than foreign trade alone.
Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application:
- Identify the dominant value celebrated in Sangam poems.
Final Logic:
- Generous redistribution is the central social ideal.
Chief = Share Wealth
17 Which of the following is INCORRECT regarding the relationship between chiefs and bards in ancient Tamilakam?
Chiefs were expected to share wealth. Bards celebrated generosity. Hoarding contradicted Sangam ideals.
Sangam literature repeatedly praises chiefs who redistributed wealth and helped poets. Miserliness was criticized. Therefore the idea that chiefs accumulated wealth only to preserve succession and refused to share directly contradicts the values expressed in the poems. Hence Option C is incorrect.
- Option A → Chiefs acted as patrons of poets.
- Option B → Praise poetry celebrated bravery and generosity.
- Option D → Bards often highlighted poverty to obtain support.
Used: Odd One Out
Application:
- Identify the statement that contradicts the central value of generosity.
Final Logic:
- Hoarding wealth conflicts with Sangam ideals.
Good Chief = Gives
18 Assertion (A): In Sangam society, poets often sang praises of a chief's military endeavors.
Reason (R): The chief acquired wealth through warfare (like using a long spear) in order to fulfill his duty of sharing it with bards.
Warfare brought resources. Chiefs redistributed wealth. Bards praised both achievements.
Poets praised military success because warfare often generated wealth and prestige. Chiefs were expected to share this wealth generously with dependents and bards. Thus military achievement and generosity were closely linked, making the Reason a correct explanation of the Assertion. Therefore Option A is correct.
- Option B → The Reason directly explains the Assertion.
- Option C → The Reason is historically supported.
- Option D → The Assertion is also correct.
Used: Elimination
Application:
- Test the truth of both statements and the explanatory link.
Final Logic:
- Military success enabled generosity, which poets celebrated.
Spear → Wealth → Gifts
19 Fill in the blank: The Sutta Pitaka myth suggests that if human beings were responsible for the creation of the system of kingship, they could also _______ it in the future.
Kingship arose through human choice. Institutions are not permanent. Society can reform itself.
The Buddhist social contract theory argues that kingship emerged because people collectively chose a ruler. If humans created the institution, they also possess the capacity to modify or change it. This reflects recognition of human agency. Therefore Option B is correct.
- Option A → Worship does not follow from the theory.
- Option C → Inheritance is not the central idea.
- Option D → Exporting kingship is irrelevant.
Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application:
- Extend the logic of human agency to its conclusion.
Final Logic:
- Human-made institutions can be altered by humans.
Created = Can Change
20 According to the Buddhist social contract theory, the institution of kingship arose out of:
Society faced disorder. People selected a ruler. Kingship emerged through collective agreement.
The Sutta Pitaka explains that growing greed and conflict led people to choose a ruler, Mahasammata, to maintain order. The ruler was supported through taxes in return for services. This represents a social contract based on human choice rather than divine authority. Therefore Option D is correct.
- Option A → Kingship was not explained as a divine curse.
- Option B → Buddhist texts reject innate superiority.
- Option C → The institution was not created by Brahmanical command.
Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching
Application:
- Focus on the central idea of the Buddhist origin story.
Final Logic:
- Kingship emerged through collective human action and agreement.
Mahasammata = People's Choice
