CUET UG Business Studies Test 3 Taylorβs Scientific Management Principles
π Answers are locked once submitted β results and explanations appear at the end.
QUESTION 1 OF 20
QUESTION 2 OF 20
QUESTION 3 OF 20
Match the Taylorian principle to its core analytical impact on organisational behavior:
| List 1 | List 2 |
|---|---|
| 1. Science, not Rule of Thumb | A. Maximises personnel competencies and matches skills |
| 2. Harmony, Not Discord | B. Replaces competition with a paternalistic style and suggestions system |
| 3. Cooperation, Not Individualism | C. Unifies best practices into standard methods via work-study |
| 4. Development of Each Person | D. Fosters mutual prosperity and eliminates class conflict |
QUESTION 4 OF 20
Statement I: The sum and substance of Taylor's ideas lies in the disjointed description of principles and techniques of scientific management.
Statement II: The core of Taylor's philosophy involves a change of mindset, which he referred to as a mental revolution.
QUESTION 5 OF 20
Assertion (A): Taylor believed that when open communication and goodwill prevail, there will be no need for a trade union.
Reason (R): Paternalistic style of management ensures the employer takes care of the needs of employees, replacing competition with cooperation.
QUESTION 6 OF 20
In Japanese companies, if workers go on strike, they wear a black badge but work more than normal working hours. Analytically, what does this behavioral dynamic demonstrate about mutual trust?
QUESTION 7 OF 20
Which of the following is NOT an analytical justification for systematic worker training under Taylorism?
QUESTION 8 OF 20
Arrange the process of executing the "Development Principle" sequentially as prescribed by Taylor:
1. Give the required training to learn the best method
2. Scientifically select the individual
3. Achieve the greatest efficiency and prosperity for both
4. Match assigned work to physical, mental, and intellectual capabilities
QUESTION 9 OF 20
Assertion (A): Motion study aims to identify productive, incidental, and unproductive motions.
Reason (R): Taylor used stopwatches, various symbols, and colours to map these motions and eliminate unnecessary ones.
QUESTION 10 OF 20
Match the operational example to the correct Work Study technique:
| List 1 | List 2 |
|---|---|
| 1. Reducing bricklaying motions from 18 to 5 | A. Fatigue Study |
| 2. Devising an assembly line for Ford cars | B. Method Study |
| 3. Providing small pauses for heavy manual labor | C. Time Study |
| 4. Measuring component parts to the second to set standard targets | D. Motion Study |
QUESTION 11 OF 20
Match the strategic objective with either Standardisation or Simplification:
| List 1 | List 2 |
|---|---|
| 1. Establishing interchangeability of manufactured parts | A. Objective of Simplification |
| 2. Eliminating superfluous varieties, sizes, and dimensions | B. Objective of Standardisation |
| 3. Establishing standards of performance of men and machines | A. Objective of Simplification |
| 4. Reducing inventories and ensuring fuller utilisation of equipment | B. Objective of Standardisation |
QUESTION 12 OF 20
Statement I: Standardisation strictly implies devising new varieties to increase market diversity.
Statement II: Simplification focuses entirely on establishing standards of excellence and quality in materials.
QUESTION 13 OF 20
Assertion (A): Taylor advocated the separation of planning and execution functions down to the lowest level of the shop floor.
Reason (R): Taylor identified that no single foreman could possess all required qualities (intelligence, tact, grit, technical mastery, etc.) simultaneously.
QUESTION 14 OF 20
Arrange the hierarchical sequence of task allocation under Functional Foremanship from top to bottom:
1. Workman
2. Planning/Production Incharge
3. Factory Manager
4. Specialist Bosses/Clerks (e.g., Gang Boss, Route Clerk)
QUESTION 15 OF 20
An employee named Schmidt was able to earn 60% more wages from $1.15 to $1.85 by increasing his pig iron loading from 12.5 tons to 47 tons per day. This dramatic output increase is a textbook application of which system?
QUESTION 16 OF 20
Which of the following is NOT an analytical outcome or goal of reducing production costs via scientific management techniques?
QUESTION 17 OF 20
Statement I: The search for efficiency requires the chosen method to lead directly to the determination of a fair day's work.
Statement II: Scientific worker selection is irrelevant once a fair day's work is determined by time studies.
QUESTION 18 OF 20
Assertion (A): Taylor insisted that work assigned to an individual should perfectly match their physical, mental, and intellectual capabilities.
Reason (R): Misallocating heavy manual labor without proper skill matching creates severe fatigue and rapidly depletes worker efficiency.
QUESTION 19 OF 20
Match the elements of 'Management Cooperation' and 'Joint Effort' with their intended outcomes:
| List 1 | List 2 |
|---|---|
| 1. Open communication system | A. Motivates workers to contribute their might for company profits |
| 2. Equal division of responsibility | B. Constitutes the essence of Mental Revolution |
| 3. Changing attitude from competition to cooperation | C. Prevents workers from feeling burdened and unsupported |
| 4. Sharing a part of the surplus | D. Eliminates the need for trade unions |
QUESTION 20 OF 20
When management and workers successfully undergo a "Mental Revolution" to maximise joint effort, which of the following is NOT expected to occur?
Test Complete!
Answer Review
1
Rule of thumb involves many variations of the same tool. Scientific management seeks to standardize these variations. The goal is to create one "best" version based on proven speed and ease.
οΏ½οΏ½ According to the passage, the scientific approach involves investigating various modifications developed under the "rule of thumb." The objective is not to discard tradition entirely but to extract the "good points" of several traditional implements. By unifying these into a single standard implementation, management provides a tool that allows workmen to work with greater speed and ease. This is the essence of "Science, Not Rule of Thumb," where individual judgment is replaced by a scientifically determined standard.
- Option A β The text specifically mentions "unifying the good points" of existing modifications rather than discarding them for entirely new inventions.
- Option C β Allowing individual choice is the definition of "rule of thumb," which the scientific approach explicitly aims to replace.
- Option D β The text states that time and motion studies are the method used to achieve the outcome, not something to be eliminated.
Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching Application: The phrase "unified in a single standard implementation" in the passage matches Option B almost exactly. Final Logic: The passage describes a synthesis of traditional tools into a singular, optimized standard.
Pick the Best, Leave the Rest. Take the good points of many and make them into "One Best Way."
2
Validation must be objective and measurable. Speed and ease are the primary metrics for success. Scientific techniques like time and motion study provide the necessary data.
οΏ½οΏ½ The text clearly outlines a two-step process: first, investigation of modifications; second, a time and motion study to measure the speed attainable with each implement. This measurement serves as the scientific validation. Only after these studies prove which features enable the workman to work faster is the "single standard implementation" created. This removes subjective bias or "voting" from the process.
- Option A β Trade unions are not mentioned as a validation body in this scientific process; the focus is on technical efficiency.
- Option B β While owners may approve, the validation method described is technical (study), not hierarchical.
- Option D β Market testing applies to end products; here, the focus is on internal production tools (implements).
Used: Substitution Application: The text explicitly mentions "after time and motion study has been made...". Final Logic: Objective measurement (time/motion) is the scientific proof required for standardization.
Watch & Clock. Validation comes from the stopwatch (Time) and observing movement (Motion).
3 Match the Taylorian principle to its core analytical impact on organisational behavior:
| List 1 | List 2 |
|---|---|
| 1. Science, not Rule of Thumb | A. Maximises personnel competencies and matches skills |
| 2. Harmony, Not Discord | B. Replaces competition with a paternalistic style and suggestions system |
| 3. Cooperation, Not Individualism | C. Unifies best practices into standard methods via work-study |
| 4. Development of Each Person | D. Fosters mutual prosperity and eliminates class conflict |
Science = Standards/Study. Harmony = No class conflict. Cooperation = Paternalism/Suggestions. Development = Competencies/Skills.
οΏ½οΏ½ 1-C: Science, Not Rule of Thumb focuses on replacing guesswork with standard methods found through work-study. 2-D: Harmony, Not Discord aims to eliminate class conflict by showing that the interests of both are the same. 3-B: Cooperation, Not Individualism is an extension of harmony, often involving a paternalistic style and rewarding employee suggestions. 4-A: Development of Each Person is about matching skills to tasks and training to maximize competency.
- Option B β Pairs Science (1) with Harmony's outcome (D).
- Option C β Incorrectly pairs Science (1) with Development's outcome (A).
- Option D β Pairs Science (1) with Cooperation's outcome (B).
Used: Option Grouping Application: Matching 4-A (Development-Competencies) is a high-confidence link. Only Option A has this pairing. Final Logic: Aligning the principle with its primary behavioral objective clarifies the organizational impact.
S-S (Science-Standard), H-H (Harmony-Happy/No Conflict), C-C (Cooperation-Confidence/Suggestions), D-D (Development-Degree of Skill).
4 Statement I: The sum and substance of Taylor's ideas lies in the disjointed description of principles and techniques of scientific management.
Statement II: The core of Taylor's philosophy involves a change of mindset, which he referred to as a mental revolution.
Scientific management is an integrated philosophy, not a "disjointed" list. Mental revolution is the vital core. Transformation of attitude is required for principles to work.
οΏ½οΏ½ Statement I is incorrect; NCERT explicitly states that Taylor's ideas are not a "disjointed description" but a complete philosophy. Statement II is correct; Taylor emphasized that for scientific management to succeed, a Mental Revolution is required. This involves a total change of mindset where both management and workers stop fighting over the division of surplus and instead focus on increasing the surplus through cooperation.
- Option A β Incorrect as it wrongly characterizes Taylor's work as disjointed.
- Option B β Incorrect because Statement I is factually wrong.
- Option D β Incorrect because Statement II accurately reflects Taylor's core philosophy.
Used: Extreme Word Filter Application: The word "disjointed" is a negative descriptor that rarely applies to a recognized management "system." Final Logic: Scientific management is a unified system, and Mental Revolution is its central heart.
Whole Mind. Taylor is a "Whole" system (Not disjointed) that requires a change of "Mind" (Mental Revolution).
5 Assertion (A): Taylor believed that when open communication and goodwill prevail, there will be no need for a trade union.
Reason (R): Paternalistic style of management ensures the employer takes care of the needs of employees, replacing competition with cooperation.
Open communication removes the "us vs. them" barrier. Paternalism treats employees like family (cared for). If grievances are resolved through care, unions become redundant.
οΏ½οΏ½ Assertion (A) is true; Taylor's "Cooperation, Not Individualism" principle aims to create a workplace where goodwill and open communication make formal agitation (trade unions) unnecessary. Reason (R) is also true and explains why Assertion A works. By adopting a paternalistic style, the employer proactively meets worker needs. When competition for resources is replaced by this cooperative care, the primary reason for a trade unionβprotecting workers from managementβis eliminated.
- Option B β R is the explanation for A; paternalistic care is the method that creates the goodwill mentioned in A.
- Option C β R is true as it describes the cooperative management style mentioned in NCERT.
- Option D β A is true as it represents Taylor's specific stance on industrial relations.
Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching Application: Identifying the link between "No Trade Union" and "Employer taking care" creates a clear cause-and-effect. Final Logic: If the boss acts like a parent (Paternalism), the worker doesn't need an outside protector (Union).
Dad doesn't need a Lawyer. Paternal (Dad-like) management makes Unions (Lawyers) unnecessary.
6 In Japanese companies, if workers go on strike, they wear a black badge but work more than normal working hours. Analytically, what does this behavioral dynamic demonstrate about mutual trust?
Japanese strikes do not stop the "flow" of work. The black badge is a symbolic protest. Working extra hours is a "plea" for consideration, not a "threat."
οΏ½οΏ½ This Japanese example illustrates the paternalistic nature of their management-labor relations. In a paternalistic culture, the company is seen as a family. When workers are unhappy, they don't want to hurt the "family" (the company) by stopping production. Instead, they work more to show their dedication and gain management's sympathy and fairness. This is the ultimate example of Harmony and Cooperation over conflict.
- Option A β The act is voluntary and aimed at gaining sympathy, not driven by fear of punishment.
- Option B β Individualism would involve acting for self-interest; this is a collective act for the company's benefit.
- Option D β This is a highly sophisticated behavioral method, the opposite of the unanalyzed "rule of thumb."
Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching Application: Working "more" during a "strike" is an act of high cooperation and harmony. Final Logic: Symbolic protest while maintaining productivity is a hallmark of paternalistic harmony.
Badge but Busy. Wear the badge to protest, stay busy to show love for the firm.
7 Which of the following is NOT an analytical justification for systematic worker training under Taylorism?
Training is for operational efficiency. Specialization keeps workers in their specific expert roles. Scientific management maintains a strict hierarchy (Functional Foremanship).
οΏ½οΏ½ Taylorism advocates for training to ensure everyone uses the "one best way" (A), which increases efficiency (C). This efficiency leads to mutual prosperity (D) as workers earn more and companies profit more. However, Taylor did not intend for worker training to be a path for workers to replace management (B). In fact, Taylor's system of "Functional Foremanship" relies on specialized managers planning and workers executing; they are distinct roles.
- Option A β This is the primary purpose of scientific training.
- Option C β Improved competence is the direct result of training.
- Option D β Prosperity is the ultimate goal of developing each person to their greatest efficiency.
Used: Odd One Out Application: Options A, C, and D all relate to efficiency and gain-sharing. Option B relates to career progression/replacement, which isn't part of Taylor's shop-floor theory. Final Logic: Taylor's training is for "How to Work," not "How to Manage."
Skill Up, Not Move Up. Training is about better skills, not taking the boss's job.
8 Arrange the process of executing the "Development Principle" sequentially as prescribed by Taylor:
1. Give the required training to learn the best method
2. Scientifically select the individual
3. Achieve the greatest efficiency and prosperity for both
4. Match assigned work to physical, mental, and intellectual capabilities
Selection happens at the gate (2). Check the person's "fit" for the specific job (4). Teach them the "best way" (1). The result is high efficiency (3).
οΏ½οΏ½ The "Development of Each Person" principle follows a logical HR flow. It begins with Scientific Selection (2) where people are hired based on objective criteria. Next, management must Match work (4) to their specific capabilities (e.g., don't give a math task to someone with only physical strength). Once matched, the worker must receive Training (1) in the scientifically determined best method. Only after these three steps can they achieve Greatest efficiency/prosperity (3).
- Option B β Training (1) cannot happen before you have selected (2) the person.
- Option C β Prosperity (3) is the result, not the starting point.
- Option D β You must match the work (4) to the person's traits before you can train them (1) on how to do that specific work.
Used: Dimensional/Unit Analysis Application: Selection is always the first step in the personnel lifecycle. Final Logic: Hire -> Match -> Train -> Result.
S-M-T-P: Select -> Match -> Train -> Prosper.
9 Assertion (A): Motion study aims to identify productive, incidental, and unproductive motions.
Reason (R): Taylor used stopwatches, various symbols, and colours to map these motions and eliminate unnecessary ones.
Motion study breaks down physical movement. Some movements add value (Productive), some don't (Unproductive). Tools like symbols and colors are the scientific "map" to find the waste.
οΏ½οΏ½ Assertion (A) is true as it defines the core objective of Motion Studyβto categorize movements so that waste can be removed. Reason (R) is true and explains the methodology used to achieve A. Taylor utilized stopwatches and symbolic notation (like Therbligs) to visually "map" what a worker does. This scientific mapping (R) is exactly how management is able to identify and then eliminate the unproductive motions mentioned in (A).
- Option B β R is the explanation; you can't identify the types of motions without the mapping tools mentioned in R.
- Option C β R is factually true; Taylor was known for using these specific tools in his studies.
- Option D β A is a fundamentally correct management principle.
Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching Application: "Identifying" (A) requires "Mapping Tools" (R). Final Logic: The tools mentioned in the Reason are what make the identification in the Assertion possible.
Stop and Map. Stopwatches and Maps (Symbols) find the bad (unproductive) moves.
10 Match the operational example to the correct Work Study technique:
| List 1 | List 2 |
|---|---|
| 1. Reducing bricklaying motions from 18 to 5 | A. Fatigue Study |
| 2. Devising an assembly line for Ford cars | B. Method Study |
| 3. Providing small pauses for heavy manual labor | C. Time Study |
| 4. Measuring component parts to the second to set standard targets | D. Motion Study |
Fewer motions = Motion Study. Assembly line (Best way) = Method Study. Pauses/Rest = Fatigue Study. Measuring seconds = Time Study.
οΏ½οΏ½ 1-D: Frank Gilbreth (Taylor's associate) used Motion Study to cut bricklaying moves. 2-B: The "one best way" for Ford cars was the assembly line, found via Method Study. 3-A: Rest intervals to recover stamina is the goal of Fatigue Study. 4-C: Determining the standard time for a task by measuring it in seconds is Time Study.
- Option B β Pairs bricklaying with Method study and assembly line with Motion study.
- Option C β Pairs bricklaying with Time study.
- Option D β Pairs bricklaying with Fatigue study.
Used: Option Grouping Application: Identify 3-A (Pauses-Fatigue) as a clear link. This narrows choices significantly. Match 1-D (Motions-Motion Study) to finalize. Final Logic: Each example represents the specific industrial application of the corresponding technique.
M-M (Motion-Movements), M-M (Method-Model/Ford), F-F (Fatigue-Finish line/Rest), T-T (Time-Timer).
11 Match the strategic objective with either Standardisation or Simplification:
| List 1 | List 2 |
|---|---|
| 1. Establishing interchangeability of manufactured parts | A. Objective of Simplification |
| 2. Eliminating superfluous varieties, sizes, and dimensions | B. Objective of Standardisation |
| 3. Establishing standards of performance of men and machines | A. Objective of Simplification |
| 4. Reducing inventories and ensuring fuller utilisation of equipment | B. Objective of Standardisation |
Standardization = Setting rules/benchmarks. Simplification = Removing variety/cutting waste. Interchangeability requires a standard (rule). Inventory reduction comes from having fewer types (simplicity).
οΏ½οΏ½ 1-B: Interchangeability is a hallmark of Standardisation; parts must be identical to be swappable. 2-A: Eliminating superfluous variety is the definition of Simplification. 3-B: Standards of performance are benchmarks, which fall under Standardisation. 4-A: Fuller utilization/Reduced inventory happens when you Simplify the product line, as machines don't need constant resetting for different varieties.
- Option B β Incorrectly pairs interchangeability with simplification.
- Option C β Incorrectly pairs performance standards with simplification.
- Option D β Incorrectly pairs all objectives.
Used: Option Grouping Application: Link 2-A (Varieties-Simplification). This limits options to A or D. Match 1-B (Interchange-Standard) to confirm A. Final Logic: Standardisation is about "How good/What kind," Simplification is about "How many."
Standard = Rule. Simple = Subtract.
12 Statement I: Standardisation strictly implies devising new varieties to increase market diversity.
Statement II: Simplification focuses entirely on establishing standards of excellence and quality in materials.
Standardisation is about benchmarks, not adding "new varieties." Simplification is about removing varieties, not setting "quality standards." Both statements cross-link the definitions incorrectly.
οΏ½οΏ½ Statement I is incorrect; Standardisation is about establishing benchmarks and interchangeability, not increasing diversity. In fact, scientific management often reduces diversity to increase efficiency. Statement II is incorrect; Simplification is the act of eliminating unnecessary variety. The "standards of excellence" in materials mentioned in Statement II is actually an objective of Standardisation.
- Option A β Incorrect as Statement I provides a false definition.
- Option B β Incorrect because both definitions are swapped/wrong.
- Option C β Incorrect because quality standards are the domain of standardization, not simplification.
Used: Substitution Application: Substitute the correct terms. "Setting Quality" = Standard; "Eliminating Variety" = Simple. Final Logic: Since the prompt reverses these fundamental definitions, both statements are false.
Standard = Quality. Simple = Quantity (Less).
13 Assertion (A): Taylor advocated the separation of planning and execution functions down to the lowest level of the shop floor.
Reason (R): Taylor identified that no single foreman could possess all required qualities (intelligence, tact, grit, technical mastery, etc.) simultaneously.
Managers plan; workers do. One person cannot be an expert in everything. 8 specialists (Functional Foremanship) replace 1 general boss.
οΏ½οΏ½ Assertion (A) is true; Taylor's Functional Foremanship is built on separating the mental (planning) work from the manual (execution) work. Reason (R) is true and provides the logic: Taylor observed that it was impossible to find one person who was smart, strong, technical, and a good disciplinarian all at once. By separating these roles (R), he could use 8 different specialists to manage the worker, which justifies the functional division in (A).
- Option B β R is the explanation; the lack of a "perfect foreman" is the reason for creating the 8-specialist structure.
- Option C β R is true and is a specific list of qualities mentioned in NCERT.
- Option D β A is a fundamental pillar of Taylor's shop-floor philosophy.
Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching Application: The limitation of human ability (R) directly necessitates the division of roles (A). Final Logic: Since one man can't do it all, Taylor split the job into planning and execution.
Split the Brain. Planning is the brain, Execution is the hands. 8 experts run the brain.
14 Arrange the hierarchical sequence of task allocation under Functional Foremanship from top to bottom:
1. Workman
2. Planning/Production Incharge
3. Factory Manager
4. Specialist Bosses/Clerks (e.g., Gang Boss, Route Clerk)
The Factory Manager is the highest authority. Two department heads sit under the manager. The 8 bosses report to the incharge. All 8 bosses give orders to the single worker at the bottom.
οΏ½οΏ½ According to the NCERT diagram for Functional Foremanship, the hierarchy starts with the Factory Manager (3). Under him, there are two departmental heads: the Planning and Production Incharges (2). Under each incharge, there are four Specialist Bosses/Clerks (4). At the very bottom of the chain is the Workman (1), who receives instructions from all eight specialists.
- Option B β The Manager (3) must be above the Incharge (2).
- Option C β Specialist Bosses (4) are below the Incharge (2).
- Option D β Reverses the hierarchy (puts specialists at the top).
Used: Dimensional/Unit Analysis Application: Identify the top (Manager) and bottom (Worker). Only A and C start with 3 and end with 1. Final Logic: Bosses (4) work for the Incharge (2). Thus 2 must come before 4.
Manager -> Incharge -> Bosses -> Worker. (M-I-B-W).
15 An employee named Schmidt was able to earn 60% more wages from $1.15 to $1.85 by increasing his pig iron loading from 12.5 tons to 47 tons per day. This dramatic output increase is a textbook application of which system?
Taylor used "Schmidt" as a famous case study. Scientific analysis tripled Schmidt's output. Higher pay for higher output provided the incentive.
οΏ½οΏ½ This is the classic example of Taylor's Differential Piece Wage System. By analyzing the movements and setting a high standard, Taylor showed that a worker could produce vastly more than they did under the rule of thumb. To motivate this, he paid a higher rate per ton if the high target was reached. Schmidt's earnings increase directly reflects the financial incentive used to reward efficient workers who reach scientific targets.
- Option A β Gang Plank is Fayol's principle for communication speed in an emergency.
- Option C β Decentralization is about authority distribution, not individual worker wages.
- Option D β Schmidt's success was the end of the rule of thumb (which was only 12.5 tons).
Used: Substitution Application: "More Work = More Pay" is the definition of Differential Piece Wage. Final Logic: Using money to reward extra-high output is the "Differential" technique.
Pay per Piece. More pieces (tons) = Higher pay rate.
16 Which of the following is NOT an analytical outcome or goal of reducing production costs via scientific management techniques?
Scientific management aims to eliminate waste. Scrap and waiting time are "unproductive." Management techniques are designed to reduce these issues.
οΏ½οΏ½ Scientific management seeks to maximize efficiency. Techniques like Simplification and Method Study are specifically designed to reduce waste. Scrap (wasted material) and Waiting Time (idle labor/machines) are the exact opposite of what scientific management aims for. Goals like ROI (A), Inventory reduction (C), and Equipment utilization (D) are the positive results of successfully removing scrap and waiting time.
- Option A, C, D β These are all positive economic goals mentioned in the context of standardization and simplification.
Used: Odd One Out Application: Options A, C, and D are positive outcomes. Option B is a negative outcome. Final Logic: Efficiency means less waste, not more.
Waste is Bad. Scrap and Waiting are wastes that Taylor wanted to kill.
17 Statement I: The search for efficiency requires the chosen method to lead directly to the determination of a fair day's work.
Statement II: Scientific worker selection is irrelevant once a fair day's work is determined by time studies.
A "Fair day's work" is the standard determined by Time Study. Selection is never irrelevant; the wrong worker can't reach the standard. Selection and Standards are complementary.
οΏ½οΏ½ Statement I is correct; a major goal of scientific work analysis is to objectively define what a "fair day's work" should be for an average worker. Statement II is incorrect; selection is highly relevant. Even if you have a perfect standard, if you select a worker who is physically or mentally unfit for the task, they will never reach that standard. Taylor insisted that scientific selection must precede training and work execution.
- Option B β Incorrect because Statement II is false; Taylor never devalued selection.
- Option C β Incorrect because Statement I is a core tenet of Time Study.
- Option D β Incorrect because Statement I is factually correct.
Used: Elimination Application: Taylor's principles are a chain. If you break the "Selection" link (II), the "Efficiency" chain (I) fails. Final Logic: Standards mean nothing if the person doing the job is incapable.
Standards need Skills. You can't have a fair day's work (Standard) without the right worker (Selection).
18 Assertion (A): Taylor insisted that work assigned to an individual should perfectly match their physical, mental, and intellectual capabilities.
Reason (R): Misallocating heavy manual labor without proper skill matching creates severe fatigue and rapidly depletes worker efficiency.
Matching man to task is "Scientific Selection." A mismatch leads to physical/mental breakdown. Fatigue Study and Selection are logically connected.
οΏ½οΏ½ Assertion (A) is true; it represents the principle of Development of Each Person. Work must "suit" the person. Reason (R) provides the functional explanation: if you give heavy labor to someone weak, or mental work to someone untrained, they will experience fatigue and low efficiency. Therefore, matching capabilities (A) is the only way to avoid the negative outcomes mentioned in (R), making R a correct explanation.
- Option B β R is the reason for A; the goal of matching is to prevent the exact efficiency depletion mentioned in R.
- Option C β R is true as fatigue is a scientifically recognized barrier to productivity.
- Option D β A is a primary principle in Taylor's theory.
Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching Application: Capability (A) is the solution to Fatigue (R). Final Logic: To ensure efficiency, management must avoid the fatigue caused by mismatching.
Fit prevents Fatigue. If the worker fits the job, they won't get exhausted as fast.
19 Match the elements of 'Management Cooperation' and 'Joint Effort' with their intended outcomes:
| List 1 | List 2 |
|---|---|
| 1. Open communication system | A. Motivates workers to contribute their might for company profits |
| 2. Equal division of responsibility | B. Constitutes the essence of Mental Revolution |
| 3. Changing attitude from competition to cooperation | C. Prevents workers from feeling burdened and unsupported |
| 4. Sharing a part of the surplus | D. Eliminates the need for trade unions |
Communication = No need for Unions. Equal responsibility = Managers support workers (Not burdened). Change in attitude = Mental Revolution. Sharing surplus = Motivation.
οΏ½οΏ½ 1-D: Open communication removes the secrecy and friction that trade unions usually manage. 2-C: Equal responsibility means management helps workers "smooth the way," so workers don't feel burdened. 3-B: The Mental Revolution is defined by a shift from competition to cooperation. 4-A: Sharing surplus (profits) is the financial motivation for workers to give their maximum effort.
- Option B β Pairs communication (1) with motivation (A).
- Option C β Pairs communication (1) with burden (C).
- Option D β Pairs communication (1) with Mental Revolution (B).
Used: Option Grouping Application: Link 3-B (Attitude-Mental Revolution) as the core definition. This narrows to Option A. Final Logic: Match the management action to its specific human-relations benefit.
Open Talk-No Union, Share Load-No Burden, Mind Shift-Revolution, Share Cash-Motivation.
20 When management and workers successfully undergo a "Mental Revolution" to maximise joint effort, which of the following is NOT expected to occur?
Mental Revolution = Cooperation. Restricting output is an act of discord/conflict. Increasing the "pie" (surplus) replaces fighting over the "slices."
οΏ½οΏ½ A Mental Revolution is about shifting from conflict to cooperation. Both parties focus on increasing the surplus (A) so there is more for everyone. In this state, strikes are eliminated (B) and management willingly shares (D) profits. Restricting output (C) is a behavior from the old way (Individualism/Discord) where workers feared that more work only helped the boss. In a mental revolution, workers know that more output helps them earn more.
- Option A, B, D β These are the three specific outcomes Taylor promised would happen if a mental revolution took place.
Used: Odd One Out Application: Options A, B, and D are cooperative and positive. Option C is confrontational and negative. Final Logic: Revolution changes the mindset away from output restriction.
Grow the Pie. Don't fight over the slice; grow the whole pie together.
