CUET UG Business Studies Test 3 Significance of Principles of Management
📌 Answers are locked once submitted — results and explanations appear at the end.
QUESTION 1 OF 20
In an emergency, it is desirable that someone takes charge and others follow. However, when setting up a new factory requiring cross-functional expertise, a participative approach is better. This difference in application requires an understanding of situations because principles are:
QUESTION 2 OF 20
Which of the following is NOT true regarding how management principles are formed to help managers learn from the past?
QUESTION 3 OF 20
Sequence Taylor's steps to improve efficiency by determining a 'fair day's work':
1. Set a standard task limit based on time taken per unit.
2. Conduct method study to find the "one best way".
3. Reward efficient workers using a differential piece wage system.
4. Conduct time study to determine the standard time.
QUESTION 4 OF 20
Assertion (A): Simplification aims at eliminating superfluous varieties, sizes, and dimensions.
Reason (R): This elimination saves time and results in savings of cost of labour, machines, and tools, increasing efficiency.
QUESTION 5 OF 20
Match the scientific work study techniques to their specific resource utilization goal:
| List 1 | List 2 |
|---|---|
| 1. Fatigue study | A. Determines the amount and frequency of rest intervals to regain stamina. |
| 2. Motion study | B. Determines the standard time to calculate labour costs. |
| 3. Time study | C. Minimises the cost of production and maximizes quality by finding the best sequence. |
| 4. Method study | D. Eliminates unnecessary physical movements to complete the job in less time. |
QUESTION 6 OF 20
Statement I: Frank Gilbreth reduced motions in brick layering from 18 to 5 using motion study.
Statement II: This elimination of unproductive motions increased productivity by four times, representing massive cost reduction.
QUESTION 7 OF 20
A manager replaces his personal judgment (rule of thumb) with a scientific inquiry method. He begins investigating traditional methods through work-study, unifies the best practices, and develops a standard method for loading iron pigs. This directly results in: Options:
QUESTION 8 OF 20
According to Taylor, an objective judgement in scientific management does NOT rely on:
QUESTION 9 OF 20
QUESTION 10 OF 20
QUESTION 11 OF 20
Match Toyota's guiding principles to their corresponding social/ethical focus:
| List 1 | List 2 |
|---|---|
| 1. Principle 1 | A. Provide clean and safe products to enhance the quality of life everywhere |
| 2. Principle 2 | B. Honour mutual trust and respect between management and labour |
| 3. Principle 3 | C. Respect the culture and customs of every nation |
| 4. Principle 5 | D. Honour the language and spirit of the law of every nation |
QUESTION 12 OF 20
Shri Mahila Griha Udyog Lijjat Papad considers its institution not just a place to earn a livelihood but a place of worship to devote energy for the benefit of all (including providing scholarships). This represents the core values of:
QUESTION 13 OF 20
Assertion (A): Management principles have gained importance with the increasing professionalisation of management.
Reason (R): They lend credibility to a learnable and teachable discipline, meaning ascent to a managerial position depends on requisite qualifications and skill development rather than birth.
QUESTION 14 OF 20
According to Taylor's emphasis on the scientific education and development of a workman, which of the following is NOT an objective?
QUESTION 15 OF 20
A company adopts a Japanese approach that focuses on the elimination of waste (activities that add cost but not value) and teaches people how to do rapid experiments using the scientific method. This continuous innovation is known as:
QUESTION 16 OF 20
Sequence the conceptual evolution of quality and operations techniques based on management research:
1. Time and Motion Studies (Taylor).
2. Operations Research (OR) during WW2.
3. Lean Manufacturing and Six Sigma.
QUESTION 17 OF 20
Statement I: Taylor advocated for a 'Mental Revolution' where management and workers share gains and transform their thinking.
Statement II: This rational approach reduces bias, creating harmony instead of destructive class-conflict.
QUESTION 18 OF 20
By ensuring the subordination of individual interest to general interest, a manager who prevents a small group of individuals from exerting undue pressure on the company is executing:
QUESTION 19 OF 20
Assertion (A): Functional foremanship improves overall performance by extending the principle of division of work to the shop floor.
Reason (R): It assigns workers to take orders from eight different specialists according to their specific technical qualities and intelligence.
QUESTION 20 OF 20
"True interests of the two are one and the same; prosperity for the employer cannot exist for a long time unless it is accompanied by prosperity for the employees." Taylor's philosophy here directly ensures:
Test Complete!
Answer Review
1 In an emergency, it is desirable that someone takes charge and others follow. However, when setting up a new factory requiring cross-functional expertise, a participative approach is better. This difference in application requires an understanding of situations because principles are:
Management principles are not absolute or rigid. Their application depends on the specific context and timing. They are flexible guidelines adapted to the environment.
�� Management principles are contingent or situational. This means their application is not fixed but depends on the prevailing circumstances at a particular point in time. In the example provided, an "emergency" warrants a centralized, authoritative approach for speed, whereas a "new factory setup" requires the diverse input of experts (participative approach). This flexibility allows managers to apply different principles (e.g., Centralization vs. Initiative) based on what the specific reality demands.
- Option A → Principles are universal (applicable everywhere) but they are not static; they must be modified according to the situation.
- Option C → Principles of management are social science guidelines, not pure science derivations like the laws of physics, which remain constant regardless of the situation.
- Option D → Principles are designed to serve organizational goals and general interests, not the selfish or arbitrary interests of individuals.
Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching Application: The prompt highlights a "difference in application" based on the "situation," which leads directly to the definition of "contingent." Final Logic: If the method changes when the situation changes, the principle is situational or contingent.
Depends = Contingent. If the answer is "it depends," the nature is contingent.
2 Which of the following is NOT true regarding how management principles are formed to help managers learn from the past?
Management principles are empirical, not just armchair theories. They are born out of real-world trials and failures. Human behavior and organizational results are the primary data sources.
�� Management principles are not developed in a vacuum or purely through theoretical speculation. They are formed through a rigorous process of observation and experimentation in real-world managerial situations. For example, the principle of "Division of Work" was established after observing that it led to specialization and efficiency in practice. Because they involve human behavior, they are deeply rooted in practical human experience rather than abstract theory alone.
- Option A → Principles represent the distilled wisdom and experiences of successful managers over decades.
- Option C → This is the actual method of formation; researchers observe a practice, measure the result, and then codify it as a principle.
- Option D → As the business environment changes, principles are refined and new ones evolve to meet modern needs.
Used: Elimination Application: Knowing that management is an "Applied Science" allows us to eliminate any option that claims it is "Purely Theoretical." Final Logic: Management principles are practical tools; therefore, they cannot be purely theoretical.
Do to Know. You have to "do" (practice/experiment) to "know" (form a principle).
3 Sequence Taylor's steps to improve efficiency by determining a 'fair day's work':
1. Set a standard task limit based on time taken per unit.
2. Conduct method study to find the "one best way".
3. Reward efficient workers using a differential piece wage system.
4. Conduct time study to determine the standard time.
First, find the best method (Method Study). Then, measure how long it takes (Time Study). Set the baseline for a day's work (Standard Task). Pay based on performance (Differential Piece Wage).
�� Scientific management follows a logical progression 1. Method Study (2): First, you must find the "one best way" to do the job to eliminate waste. 2. Time Study (4): Once the method is fixed, you use a stopwatch to determine the standard time an average worker takes. 3. Set Standard Task (1): Based on that time, you define what constitutes a "fair day's work" or standard task. 4. Differential Piece Wage (3): Finally, you implement the incentive system to reward those who exceed this standard.
- Option A → You cannot conduct a time study (4) effectively until you have standardized the method (2).
- Option C → Placing the reward (3) second is incorrect as you must establish standards first.
- Option D → Reverses the relationship between setting a task and the time study required to define it.
Used: Dimensional/Unit Analysis Application: Logical flow: Process Design -> Measurement -> Goal Setting -> Incentive. Final Logic: You must know how to work (Method) before you decide how long (Time) it should take.
M-T-S-R: Method -> Time -> Standard -> Reward.
4 Assertion (A): Simplification aims at eliminating superfluous varieties, sizes, and dimensions.
Reason (R): This elimination saves time and results in savings of cost of labour, machines, and tools, increasing efficiency.
Simplification reduces unnecessary complexity in a product line. Focuses resources on a few high-performing varieties. Direct link between range reduction and cost savings.
�� Assertion (A) is the literal definition of Simplification in scientific management. It involves cutting out unnecessary diversity in products (e.g., a paper manufacturer reducing from 2000 varieties to 200). Reason (R) is the logical justification: by having fewer varieties, the company doesn't need as many different machines, specialized tools, or complex labor processes. This reduction in variety directly leads to cost savings and higher efficiency, which is why Simplification is practiced.
- Option B → R is indeed the reason why A is performed; the two are fundamentally linked through the concept of efficiency.
- Option C → A is a factually correct definition of the technique.
- Option D → Both statements are foundational concepts of Taylor's Standardization and Simplification.
Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching Application: Use the word "Because." (A) is done because (R) is true. Final Logic: Eliminating the "extra" (Superfluous) naturally leads to "savings" in resources.
Simple = Savings. Less variety = Less cost.
5 Match the scientific work study techniques to their specific resource utilization goal:
| List 1 | List 2 |
|---|---|
| 1. Fatigue study | A. Determines the amount and frequency of rest intervals to regain stamina. |
| 2. Motion study | B. Determines the standard time to calculate labour costs. |
| 3. Time study | C. Minimises the cost of production and maximizes quality by finding the best sequence. |
| 4. Method study | D. Eliminates unnecessary physical movements to complete the job in less time. |
Fatigue = Rest (regain stamina). Motion = Movements (eliminate unnecessary ones). Time = Standard time (calculate costs/labor). Method = Best sequence (minimize cost/maximize quality).
�� 1-A: Fatigue Study is concerned with human stamina and rest. 2-D: Motion Study focuses on physical actions to cut out wasted effort. 3-B: Time Study uses statistics to set the clock for a task. 4-C: Method Study is the broader search for the "one best way" to organize the entire sequence of production for maximum quality and minimum cost.
- Option A → Pairs Fatigue (1) with production cost (C), which is the domain of Method study.
- Option B → Pairs Fatigue (1) with physical movements (D), which is the domain of Motion study.
- Option D → Pairs Fatigue (1) with standard time (B), which is the domain of Time study.
Used: Option Grouping Application: Match the most obvious pair: 1-A (Fatigue = Rest). Only Option C starts with 1-A. Final Logic: Match the name of the study to its primary unit of measurement (Rest, Movement, Time, or Method).
F-R, M-M, T-S, M-B: Fatigue-Rest, Motion-Movement, Time-Standard, Method-Best way.
6 Statement I: Frank Gilbreth reduced motions in brick layering from 18 to 5 using motion study.
Statement II: This elimination of unproductive motions increased productivity by four times, representing massive cost reduction.
Gilbreth is the pioneer of Motion Study. The bricklaying study is the most famous historical example of this technique. Science leads to exponential (4x) growth in output.
�� Statement I is true; Frank Gilbreth used stopwatches and cameras to analyze bricklayers and found they were doing many unnecessary things. He successfully reduced the movements from 18 to 5. Statement II is true; as a result of this extreme efficiency, the output increased significantly (roughly fourfold), proving that scientific analysis of human motion can lead to massive cost reduction and productivity gains.
- Option A, B, D → These are incorrect as they deny a well-documented historical fact of scientific management used to illustrate the significance of Motion Study in NCERT.
Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching Application: Both statements align with the "Scientific Management" narrative of replacing inefficiency with standard, optimized work. Final Logic: Scientific observation (I) logically results in measured productivity gains (II).
18 to 5. Remember the numbers for the bricklayer.
7 A manager replaces his personal judgment (rule of thumb) with a scientific inquiry method. He begins investigating traditional methods through work-study, unifies the best practices, and develops a standard method for loading iron pigs. This directly results in: Options:
Rule of thumb is based on intuition; Scientific inquiry is based on data. Standard methods are the result of "unifying best practices." This process is the definition of making a scientific decision.
�� When a manager moves away from "Rule of Thumb" and uses techniques like Work-study to investigate and standardize tasks (like the famous Pig Iron handling case), they are practicing Scientific Decision Making. This approach emphasizes logical thinking and facts over personal whims. It results in a "justifiable" and "realistic" way of working that improves the overall organizational output.
- Option A → The process described specifically removes subjective bias.
- Option C → Scientific management usually increases discipline through clear standards and expectations.
- Option D → Developing a standard method has nothing to do with the reporting structure (Unity of Command).
Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching Application: "Replacing personal judgment with inquiry" is the literal process of moving from intuition to science. Final Logic: Investigative method = Scientific decision.
S-S-S: Search (Inquiry) -> Standard -> Science.
8 According to Taylor, an objective judgement in scientific management does NOT rely on:
Objective = Independent of personal feelings. Instinct and "Rule of thumb" are subjective. Scientific management was specifically designed to discard these methods.
�� Scientific Management is the polar opposite of the "Rule of Thumb." Taylor argued that there is one "best way" for every task, which can only be found through Time and Motion studies (A) and careful investigation (D). Objective judgement means making decisions based on these proven facts rather than on the manager's personal instinct (C), which is inconsistent, unmeasured, and often inefficient.
- Option A & D → These are the core tools of objective scientific management.
- Option B → This is a key part of Method Study—taking the best parts of various traditional ways to create one new standard.
Used: Odd One Out Application: Options A, B, and D involve external, measurable, and collective actions. Option C involves internal, unmeasurable, and individual feelings. Final Logic: Science is external and factual; Instinct is internal and personal.
I vs. E: Instinct (Internal/Wrong) vs. Experiment (External/Scientific).
9
Management is a social science, not a physical science. Human behavior is unpredictable and diverse. Context changes, so the "Cause" doesn't always produce the same "Effect."
�� The passage notes that management principles are "less than perfect" because they deal with human behavior, which is complex and variable. Unlike chemistry, where mixing two chemicals always yields the same result, real-life situations are not identical. Because the subjects (people) and the environment change, it is hard to say "Doing X will always result in Y." However, principles still provide a useful guide to approximating these relationships.
- Option A → While this might happen, it isn't the reason given in the passage for the difficulty of cause/effect relationships.
- Option B → The passage explicitly states that situations are not identical.
- Option D → The passage concludes by saying that despite these difficulties, the principles are "therefore useful."
Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching Application: The answer is explicitly stated in the provided text snippet. Final Logic: Variation in humans + variation in situations = Inexact science.
H-H Rule: Humans are Hard to predict.
10
Principles provide a "probability" of success. They give managers a starting point for analysis. Their utility lies in being "mostly right" most of the time.
�� Even though management isn't an exact science, principles are practically useful because they help managers understand the likely outcomes of their decisions. By assisting in establishing cause and effect relationships to some extent, they allow for a dynamic response—a manager can adjust the principle to fit the specific (less than perfect) situation they are facing. This is better than having no guide at all.
- Option A → Principles are flexible guidelines, not "rigid laws."
- Option C → Management is about directing people; it doesn't aim to eliminate human behavior entirely.
- Option D → Principles are designed to fight the rule of thumb, not enforce it.
Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching Application: The phrase "assist... to some extent" in the passage matches Option B. Final Logic: Partial accuracy is still highly useful for navigation in a complex world.
Guide, not God. A principle is a helpful guide, not an infallible god of truth.
11 Match Toyota's guiding principles to their corresponding social/ethical focus:
| List 1 | List 2 |
|---|---|
| 1. Principle 1 | A. Provide clean and safe products to enhance the quality of life everywhere |
| 2. Principle 2 | B. Honour mutual trust and respect between management and labour |
| 3. Principle 3 | C. Respect the culture and customs of every nation |
| 4. Principle 5 | D. Honour the language and spirit of the law of every nation |
Principle 1 = The Law (Spirit of the law). Principle 2 = Culture (Nation's customs). Principle 3 = Product (Clean and safe). Principle 5 = People (Trust between management/labor).
�� Based on Toyota's Guiding Principles (cited in NCERT) 1-D: Principle 1 focuses on being a good corporate citizen by honouring the law. 2-C: Principle 2 emphasizes global operations by respecting cultures of other nations. 3-A: Principle 3 is about the product itself—clean and safe products for quality of life. 4-B: Principle 5 (skipping 4 in this list) focuses on the internal human relationship: mutual trust between workers and bosses.
- Option B → Pairs Principle 1 with products (A), which is actually Principle 3.
- Option C → Pairs Principle 1 with labor relations (B), which is a later principle (5).
- Option D → Pairs Principle 1 with culture (C), which is Principle 2.
Used: Option Grouping Application: Identify Principle 1-D (Law) as the foundational starting point. This narrows choices down. Final Logic: Match the sequential numbering of the company's code of conduct to the provided ethical categories.
Law-Culture-Product-People. The order of Toyota's focus (1, 2, 3, 5).
12 Shri Mahila Griha Udyog Lijjat Papad considers its institution not just a place to earn a livelihood but a place of worship to devote energy for the benefit of all (including providing scholarships). This represents the core values of:
Lijjat is a co-operative model. "Place of worship" implies deep ethical commitment. Scholarships and collective benefits equal public welfare.
�� The Lijjat Papad case study highlights the Social Responsibility aspect of management. By treating the business as a place of worship and providing extra benefits like scholarships, the organization transcends the goal of mere profit. It reflects ethical behavior and a commitment to public welfare, where the success of the business serves to uplift its members and society at large.
- Option A → Co-operatives like Lijjat are highly decentralized and democratic, not based on "strict command."
- Option B → Their success is built on very disciplined, standardized scientific processes, not whims.
- Option D → The model is "Sarvodaya" (upliftment of all), which is the opposite of individualism.
Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching Application: Words like "Benefit of all" and "Scholarships" align with the social/welfare tone of Option C. Final Logic: Management that prioritizes the collective good is fulfilling its social responsibility.
Worship = Welfare. If you treat work as worship, you work for the welfare of all.
13 Assertion (A): Management principles have gained importance with the increasing professionalisation of management.
Reason (R): They lend credibility to a learnable and teachable discipline, meaning ascent to a managerial position depends on requisite qualifications and skill development rather than birth.
Professionalism means a field is based on specific knowledge. Principles provide that "knowledge base" (Teachable/Learnable). Managers are now "made" through training, not just "born" with talent.
�� Assertion (A) is true; we see more MBA/BBA requirements today because management is now a profession. Reason (R) correctly explains this: a profession requires a body of knowledge that can be taught. By having established principles, management becomes a teachable discipline. This shifts the hiring criteria from "inheritance or birth" to qualifications and skills, directly leading to the professionalisation mentioned in A.
- Option A → R is factually true and is the core reason for the growth of management institutes.
- Option C → Both statements are central to the significance of management education.
- Option D → R is the direct justification for A; without a teachable body of principles, a field cannot become a profession.
Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching Application: The "Because" test: Management is professional because it is now a teachable discipline based on principles. Final Logic: Knowledge (R) is the foundation of a Profession (A).
Train to Gain. Professionalism means you are trained to gain the position.
14 According to Taylor's emphasis on the scientific education and development of a workman, which of the following is NOT an objective?
Taylor believed in "Scientific Selection." Workers should be developed to their "Greatest efficiency." Stagnation is a waste of human resources.
�� Taylor's principle of Development of Each and Every Person to His or Her Greatest Efficiency and Prosperity argues that workers should be selected scientifically and then trained (A) to improve. Work should be assigned based on capability (B). The goal is to reach maximum prosperity (C) for both. Option D is incorrect because scientific management seeks to increase the skill and intellectual output of the worker to maximize productivity, not to keep them stagnant.
- Option A, B, C → These are all positive objectives explicitly stated under Taylor's principles for personnel development.
Used: Odd One Out Application: Options A, B, and C are growth-oriented. Option D is restrictive and limiting. Final Logic: Scientific management is about optimization; you can't optimize by restricting growth.
Max-Person. Develop the person to the max, don't keep them at the min.
15 A company adopts a Japanese approach that focuses on the elimination of waste (activities that add cost but not value) and teaches people how to do rapid experiments using the scientific method. This continuous innovation is known as:
Japanese term for "Continuous Improvement." Focuses on small, incremental changes to eliminate waste. A direct result of modern management research.
�� Kaizen is a modern management technique (often associated with Lean Manufacturing) that focuses on continuous innovation and the elimination of waste. It encourages every employee to look for small ways to improve efficiency using a scientific method (Plan-Do-Check-Act). This represents the "Research and Development" significance of management principles in the modern era.
- Option B → This is a technique for shop-floor supervision by Taylor.
- Option C → This is Fayol's principle regarding the line of authority.
- Option D → This is Fayol's principle regarding having one plan for a group of activities.
Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching Application: "Japanese approach" and "Continuous innovation" are standard descriptors for Kaizen. Final Logic: Waste elimination + Japanese origin = Kaizen.
Kai-Zen = Change-Good. Always changing for the better.
16 Sequence the conceptual evolution of quality and operations techniques based on management research:
1. Time and Motion Studies (Taylor).
2. Operations Research (OR) during WW2.
3. Lean Manufacturing and Six Sigma.
Foundations: Basic human movement (Time/Motion). Expansion: Mathematical modeling for war logistics (OR). Modernity: Advanced statistical quality control (Six Sigma).
�� The evolution of these techniques follows the history of management research 1. Time and Motion Studies (1): Developed in the early 1900s by Taylor/Gilbreth to fix the shop floor. 2. Operations Research (2): Developed in the 1940s (WW2) to solve complex logistics and material deployment problems. 3. Lean/Six Sigma (3): Developed/popularized in the late 20th century to focus on zero-defects and waste-free production.
- Option A → Places WW2 (1940s) before the early 1900s scientific management.
- Option B → Reverses the chronological order entirely.
- Option D → Places modern quality systems before the 1940s mathematical models.
Used: Dimensional/Unit Analysis Application: Timeline check: Early 20th Century -> Mid 20th Century -> Late 20th/21st Century. Final Logic: Management moves from physical movement to mathematical models to total system quality.
Body-Math-Quality. Body (Motion), Math (OR), Quality (Sigma).
17 Statement I: Taylor advocated for a 'Mental Revolution' where management and workers share gains and transform their thinking.
Statement II: This rational approach reduces bias, creating harmony instead of destructive class-conflict.
Mental Revolution is the core of "Harmony, not Discord." It moves the focus from "Dividing the surplus" to "Increasing the surplus." Logic replaces the "Us vs. Them" emotional bias.
�� Statement I is true; Taylor's Mental Revolution called for a complete change in the mindset of both workers and managers. Instead of fighting over profits, they should work together to increase them. Statement II is true; by taking a rational approach (Scientific Management), both parties realize that their interests are the same. This reduces the bias of class-conflict and creates harmony, which is essential for organizational stability.
- Option B, C, D → These are incorrect as they deny the central philosophical tenant of Taylor's Scientific Management, which seeks to align labor and management interests.
Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching Application: "Mental Revolution" is synonymous with "Rational thinking" and "Harmony." Final Logic: A change in thinking (I) results in a change in the workplace atmosphere (II).
Think Together. Mental revolution means thinking together for the same goal.
18 By ensuring the subordination of individual interest to general interest, a manager who prevents a small group of individuals from exerting undue pressure on the company is executing:
Principles protect the many from the few. Rationality requires focusing on the "Common Good." This is a specific application of "Scientific Decision Making."
�� When a manager uses the principle of Subordination of Individual Interest to General Interest, they are making a rational decision. By resisting the "undue pressure" of a small group (individual interest), they are protecting the larger interest of the company and its stakeholders (customers, shareholders, other employees). This ensures that the organization remains objective and goal-oriented.
- Option A → This is the opposite of bias; it is an objective defense of the whole company.
- Option C → This is highly ethical, as it prevents corruption and favoritism.
- Option D → This is unrelated to the duration of an employee's contract (Tenure).
Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching Application: The principle name (Subordination...) literally defines the action (Prioritizing larger interests). Final Logic: Company goals > Individual goals.
Big > Small. The big interest always beats the small interest.
19 Assertion (A): Functional foremanship improves overall performance by extending the principle of division of work to the shop floor.
Reason (R): It assigns workers to take orders from eight different specialists according to their specific technical qualities and intelligence.
Division of Work = Specialization. Functional Foremanship = Specialization applied to bosses. One worker gets orders from 8 specialists (4 planning, 4 execution).
�� Assertion (A) is true; Functional Foremanship is Taylor's way of ensuring that workers get expert guidance in every aspect of their job, which boosts performance through extreme division of work. Reason (R) correctly explains this: because no one boss can be an expert in everything, the worker is placed under eight specialists. This ensures the worker receives high-quality technical instructions, leading to the performance improvements mentioned in A.
- Option B → R is the core mechanism of A; the 8 specialists are the extension of division of work.
- Option C → R is a factual description of the technique.
- Option D → Both statements are fundamental to the study of Scientific Management techniques.
Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching Application: The "Because" test: Performance improves because the worker is guided by 8 experts instead of one generalist. Final Logic: 8 specialists = Expert Division of Work.
Expert 8. 8 specialists for expert guidance.
20 "True interests of the two are one and the same; prosperity for the employer cannot exist for a long time unless it is accompanied by prosperity for the employees." Taylor's philosophy here directly ensures:
Employer-Employee harmony is the foundation of stability. Mutual prosperity prevents turnover and strikes. This mindset is required for "Long-term" survival.
�� Taylor's philosophy emphasizes that a business is a partnership. If only the employer prospers (high profits, low wages), the workers will be dissatisfied, leading to conflict. If only workers prosper (high wages, no profits), the business will go bankrupt. By ensuring mutual prosperity, a company achieves stability and long-term success. This is a key driver of organisational growth, as a harmonious workforce is more productive over time.
- Option A → Mutual prosperity is about sharing, not concentrating power.
- Option C → This is a structural principle, not a philosophical one about mutual benefit.
- Option D → Taylor specifically moved away from the "Military" type of foreman toward functional experts.
Used: Contextual/Tonal Matching Application: "Prosperity... for a long time" in the prompt matches "Long-term success" in the option. Final Logic: Win-Win = Long-term Win.
Grow Together. If both sides grow, the company grows.
